Jump to content

User talk:170.161.70.2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Stevepaget (talk | contribs)
Revert to revision 79641972 dated 2006-10-05 13:00:24 by MER-C using popups
Stevepaget (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 75: Line 75:
====Regarding edits made during [[October 5]] [[2006]] ([[UTC]]) to [[Night vision goggles]]====
====Regarding edits made during [[October 5]] [[2006]] ([[UTC]]) to [[Night vision goggles]]====
Please stop. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] pages, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Test3 (Third level warning) --> ''If this is an [[IP address]], and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any [[Wikipedia:vandalism|unconstructive]] edits.'' [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 13:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] pages, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Test3 (Third level warning) --> ''If this is an [[IP address]], and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any [[Wikipedia:vandalism|unconstructive]] edits.'' [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 13:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)


[[Image:Stop-hand-caution.png|left|30px]] Hello! You've removed a recently added legitimate [[:Category:User warning templates|user warning template]] from your user or user talk page. This tends to give the impression that you didn't read it. Legitimate user warning templates contain valuable information and although you may disagree, it's best if you consider them. Thank you. [[User:Stevepaget|Stevepaget]] 18:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:50, 5 October 2006

This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.


Please contribute constructively

2006

March

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --lightdarkness (talk) 19:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Chuck Norris Facts. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 19:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rory096 16:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Natgoo 12:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Counter-strike, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 19:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Maxamegalon2000 15:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Your recent edit to Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 11:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Its goals go no further, and material that does not fit this goal must be removed to another Wikimedia project, or else altogether. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Dlohcierekim 13:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Your recent edit to Peter I of Russia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- The Anome 13:50, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


May

  1. Your recent edit to Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. --Kbh3rdtalk 17:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at Tom Brady. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Masterpjz9 15:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Afghanistan

Your recent edit to Afghanistan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Sean Waltman on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Clq 16:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to List of concentration camps of Nazi Germany. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AvB ÷ talk 13:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Wikipedia

Your recent edit to Wikipedia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 18:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to USS Wisconsin (BB-64), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Canderson7 (talk) 16:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to USS Wisconsin (BB-64), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. frymaster 16:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Ancient Egypt

Your recent edit to Ancient Egypt (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during September 29 2006 (UTC) to Andy White (footballer)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 12:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Neoliberalism

Your recent edit to Neoliberalism (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jedi

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Stevepaget 11:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during October 5 2006 (UTC) to Night vision goggles

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 13:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! You've removed a recently added legitimate user warning template from your user or user talk page. This tends to give the impression that you didn't read it. Legitimate user warning templates contain valuable information and although you may disagree, it's best if you consider them. Thank you. Stevepaget 18:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]