Boophis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mark.scherz (talk | contribs) at 18:41, 30 September 2018 (→‎Species: new species). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Skeleton frogs
Boophis ankaratra
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Subclass:
Order:
Suborder:
Family:
Subfamily:
Boophinae

Vences & Glaw, 2001
Genus:
Boophis

Tschudi, 1838
Type species
Boophis goudotii
Tschudi, 1838
Diversity
Nearly 80 described species

Boophis is the only genus in the mantellid frog subfamily Boophinae. They show typical 'tree frog' traits, and are a good example of convergent evolution with morphologically similar species in the families Hylidae and Rhacophoridae, among others. This genus can only be found on Madagascar and Mayotte Island (Comoros).[1]

Taxonomy

The genus Boophis was described by Johann Jakob von Tschudi in 1838.[2] It was originally considered a member of the African-Asian family Rhacophoridae, but was moved to the family Mantellidae in 2001,[3] into its own subfamily, Boophinae Vences & Glaw, 2001.

Ecology

Many species of Boophis have almost translucent skin, allowing bones and internal organs to be observed as in the unrelated glass frogs (Centrolenidae) of the tropical Americas. This has led to the vernacular name skeleton frogs for the present genus.

Species

The genus has presently nearly 80 species; new ones are being described every few months on average. This list may not be exhaustive.

Boophis occidentalis tadpole

References

  1. ^ Glaw, Frank; Vences, Miguel (2007). A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar (3rd ed.). Cologne, Germany: Vences & Glaw Verlags. ISBN 978-3929449037.
  2. ^ Tschudi, J. J. v. (1838). Classification der Batrachier mit Berücksichtigung der fossilen Thiere dieser Abtheilung der Reptilien. Neuchâtel: Petitpierre.
  3. ^ Vences, Miguel; Glaw, Frank (2001). "When molecules claim for taxonomic changes: New proposals on the classification of Old World treefrogs". Spixiana. 24 (1): 85–92.