HMS Rupert (1872): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎External links: {{Commons category|HMS Rupert (1872)}}
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{otherships|HMS Rupert}}
{{other ships|HMS Rupert}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2020}}
{|{{Infobox Ship Begin}}
{{Use British English|date=January 2017}}
{{Infobox Ship Image
{|{{Infobox ship begin}}
|Ship image= [[File:HMS Rupert (1872) Photo.jpg|300px]]
{{Infobox ship image
|Ship image= HMS Rupert (1872) Photo.jpg
|Ship caption=''Rupert'' circa. 1890
|Ship caption=''Rupert'' circa. 1890
}}
}}
{{Infobox Ship Career
{{Infobox ship career
|Hide header=
|Hide header=
|Ship country=
|Ship country=United Kingdom
|Ship flag= [[Image:Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom.svg|100x35px|RN Ensign]]
|Ship flag= {{shipboxflag|United Kingdom|naval}}
|Ship name= HMS ''Rupert''
|Ship name= HMS ''Rupert''
|Ship namesake=
|Ship namesake=
Line 27: Line 29:
|Ship honours=
|Ship honours=
|Ship fate= Broken up, 1907
|Ship fate= Broken up, 1907
|Ship status=
|Ship notes=
|Ship notes=
}}
}}
{{Infobox Ship Characteristics
{{Infobox ship characteristics
|Hide header=
|Hide header=
|Header caption=
|Header caption=
|Ship type= [[Battleship]]
|Ship type= turret ram [[battleship]]
|Ship displacement= {{convert|5440|LT|t|0|abbr=on}}
|Ship displacement= {{convert|5440|LT|t|0|abbr=on}}
|Ship length= {{convert|250|ft|m|abbr=on}}
|Ship length= {{convert|250|ft|m|abbr=on}}
|Ship beam={{convert|53|ft|m|abbr=on}}
|Ship beam={{convert|53|ft|m|abbr=on}}
|Ship draught= {{convert|22|ft|6|in|m|abbr=on}}
|Ship draught= {{convert|22|ft|6|in|m|abbr=on}}
|Ship propulsion=Two-shaft Napier<br />{{convert|4630|ihp|0|abbr=on}}
|Ship propulsion=*Two-shaft Napier
*{{convert|4630|ihp|0|abbr=on}}
|Ship speed={{convert|13.59|kn|mph km/h|lk=on}}
|Ship speed={{convert|13.6|kn|mph km/h|lk=in}}
|Ship range=
|Ship range=
|Ship complement=217
|Ship complement=217
|Ship armament=''1874'' :<br />
|Ship armament=*''1874'' :
Armoured ram<br />
*Armoured ram
2 × [[RML 10 inch 18 ton gun|{{convert|10|in|mm|sigfig=3|sing=on}} rifled muzzle-loading guns]]<br />
*2 × [[RML 10 inch 18 ton gun|{{convert|10|in|mm|sigfig=3|adj=on}} 18 ton rifled muzzle-loading guns]]
2 × 64-pounder smoothbore<br />
*2 × 64-pounder smoothbore
''1887'' :<br />• Armoured ram<br />
*''1887'' :
*Armoured ram
• 2 × {{convert|10|in|mm|abbr=on}} muzzle-loading rifles<br />
2 × [[BL 6 inch gun Mk I - VI|BL {{convert|6|in|mm|sing=on|sigfig=4}} guns]]<br />
*2 × {{convert|10|in|mm|abbr=on}} 18 ton muzzle-loading rifles
*2 × [[BL 6 inch gun Mk I - VI|BL {{convert|6|in|mm|adj=on|sigfig=4}} gun]]
12 smaller guns<br />
*12 smaller guns
4 × torpedo tubes<br />
*4 × [[torpedo tube]]s
''1892'' :<br />
*''1892'' :
2 × [[BL 9.2 inch gun Mk I - VII|BL {{convert|9.2|in|mm|sing=on|sigfig=4}} guns]]<br />
2 × [[BL 6 inch gun Mk I - VI|BL {{convert|6|in|mm|sing=on|sigfig=4}} guns]]<br />
*2 × [[BL 9.2 inch gun Mk I - VII|BL {{convert|9.2|in|mm|adj=on|sigfig=4}} gun]]
*2 × [[BL 6 inch gun Mk I - VI|BL {{convert|6|in|mm|adj=on|sigfig=4}} gun]]
• 4 × 6-pounder quick-firers<br />• 8 smaller guns<br />
*4 × QF [[QF 6-pounder Hotchkiss|6-pounder]] guns
4 × torpedo tubes
*8 smaller guns
|Ship armour=Belt: {{convert|11|in|mm|abbr=on}} tapering to {{convert|9|in|mm|abbr=on}}<br />Breastwork: {{convert|12|in|mm|abbr=on}}<br />Turret: {{convert|14|in|mm|abbr=on}} face, {{convert|12|in|mm|abbr=on}} sides<br />Conning tower: {{convert|12|in|mm|abbr=on}}<br />Deck: {{convert|3|in|mm|abbr=on}} tapering to {{convert|2|in|mm|abbr=on}}
*4 × torpedo tubes
|Ship armour=*Belt: {{convert|11|in|mm|abbr=on}} tapering to {{convert|9|in|mm|abbr=on}}
*Breastwork: {{convert|12|in|mm|abbr=on}}
*Turret: {{convert|14|in|mm|abbr=on}} face, {{convert|12|in|mm|abbr=on}} sides
*Conning tower: {{convert|12|in|mm|abbr=on}}
*Deck: {{convert|3|in|mm|abbr=on}} tapering to {{convert|2|in|mm|abbr=on}}
|Ship notes=
|Ship notes=
}}
}}
Line 63: Line 71:


==Design==
==Design==
[[File:HMS Rupert (1872).jpg|thumb|left|<center>Right elevation and plan as depicted in [[Brassey's Naval Annual]] 1888</center>]]
[[File:HMS Rupert (1872).jpg|thumb|left|Right elevation and plan as depicted in [[Brassey's Naval Annual]] 1888]]
She was similar in design to {{HMS|Hotspur|1870|6}}, but unlike her carried a revolving turret similar to that carried in {{HMS|Glatton|1871|6}}. For reasons not recorded, it would appear that the belief prevalent at the time of the design of ''Hotspur'' that a ramming attack would damage the turret mechanism no longer held sway when ''Rupert'' was proposed.
She was similar in design to {{HMS|Hotspur|1870|6}}, but unlike her carried a revolving turret similar to that carried in {{HMS|Glatton|1871|6}}. For reasons not recorded, it would appear that the belief prevalent at the time of the design of ''Hotspur'' that a ramming attack would damage the turret mechanism no longer held sway when ''Rupert'' was proposed.


As was ''Hotspur'', she was designed at time, shortly after the [[Battle of Lissa (1866)|battle of Lissa]], when it was believed that ramming attacks would, in the event of naval conflict, be the most effective form of offensive action. Artillery power was therefore given second priority to handiness and to frontal armour, including a prolongation of the belt armour to reinforce the ram. She carried two guns in her single turret, as against the single piece in ''Hotspur'', but there was no intention or expectation of achieving all-round fire. The guns would bear from the bow to just abaft the beam on either side, except for the obstruction of the foremast and associated shrouds.
As was ''Hotspur'', she was designed at a time, shortly after the 1866 [[Battle of Lissa (1866)|battle of Lissa]], when it was believed that ramming attacks would, in the event of naval conflict, be the most effective form of offensive action. Artillery power was therefore given second priority to handiness and to frontal armour, including a prolongation of the belt armour to reinforce the ram. She carried two guns in her single turret, as against the single piece in ''Hotspur'', but there was no intention or expectation of achieving all-round fire. The guns would bear from the bow to just abaft the beam on either side, except for the obstruction of the foremast and associated shrouds.


The ship was fitted with a fore-and-aft rig on her two masts, which had been designed to allow progress in the event of engine failure. Her sail effort was, however, described by her first Captain as "not worth the inconvenience of keeping them up".
The ship was fitted with a fore-and-aft rig on her two masts, which had been designed to allow progress in the event of engine failure. Her sail effort was, however, described by her first Captain as "not worth the inconvenience of keeping them up".


As the ram had only been seen to be effective against stationary targets, as at the battle of Lissa, and against friendly ships in the course of accidental collision, the high reputation it enjoyed is wholly understandable. A report by Capt. W.E. Gordon, submitted to the [[Board of Admiralty]] in February 1878 and referring to ''Rupert'' says: "she is a comparatively simple weapon within the capacity of an ordinary man to make the best use of, whereas the Captain of the {{HMS|Alexandra|1875|2}} or {{HMS|Temeraire|1876|2}} in action would be like a man armed with sword, rapier, rifle and pistol, trying to use them all at the same time. No man's faculties are equal to making the ''best use'' of such complicated machines." The unattributed comments to this report include the phrase "good in theory but not practicable supposing enemy has 14-15 knots and ''Rupert'' 11-12".
As the ram had only been seen to be effective against stationary targets, as at the battle of Lissa, and against friendly ships in the course of accidental collision, the high reputation it enjoyed is not wholly understandable. A report by Capt. W.E. Gordon, submitted to the [[Board of Admiralty]] in February 1878 and referring to ''Rupert'' says: "she is a comparatively simple weapon within the capacity of an ordinary man to make the best use of, whereas the Captain of the {{HMS|Alexandra|1875|2}} or {{HMS|Temeraire|1876|2}} in action would be like a man armed with sword, rapier, rifle and pistol, trying to use them all at the same time. No man's faculties are equal to making the ''best use'' of such complicated machines." The unattributed comments to this report include the phrase "good in theory but not practicable supposing enemy has 14–15 knots and ''Rupert'' 11-12".


Unlike every other battleship, ''Rupert'' did not have a centre-line conning tower. Uniquely, she possessed two armoured pilot towers, one on either side just abaft the waist. These gave a good view on the beam, but very limited view over the bow, and her first captain described them as ""almost useless".
Unlike every other battleship, ''Rupert'' did not have a centre-line conning tower. Uniquely, she possessed two armoured pilot towers, one on either side just abaft the waist. These gave a good view on the beam, but very limited view over the bow, and her first captain described them as "almost useless".


== Service history ==
== Service history ==
[[File:Floating of the Twin-Screw Ram Rupert - ILN 1887.jpg|thumb|Floating of the Twin-Screw Ram Rupert at Chatham]]
She was commissioned at Devonport for the Mediterranean, and served there from 1876 to 1880. She was thereafter held in reserve at Portsmouth until being assigned to service in the [[Particular Service Squadron]] during the Russian war scare of April to August; 1885. She was then assigned as guard ship at Hull until 1890. After reconstruction and re-armament between 1891 and 1893 she was guardship at Pembroke until 1895. She was port guard ship at Gibraltar between 1895 and 1902, in Fleet Reserve until 1904, and finally guard ship at Bermuda until her sale in 1907.
She was commissioned at [[HMNB Devonport|Devonport Dockyard]] for the Mediterranean, and served there from 1876 to 1880. She was thereafter held in reserve at Portsmouth until being assigned to service in the [[Particular Service Squadron]] during the Russian war scare of April to August; 1885. She was then assigned as [[guard ship]] at [[Kingston upon Hull|Hull]] until 1890. After reconstruction and re-armament between 1891 and 1893 she was guardship at Pembroke until 1895. She was port guard ship at Gibraltar from 1895, then at [[Port Said]] until late April 1902, when she returned home.<ref>{{Cite newspaper The Times |title=Naval & Military intelligence |date=25 April 1902 |page=8 |issue=36751}}</ref> Commander Algernon B Granville Grenfell was appointed in command in May 1898. She arrived at [[Plymouth]] in early May 1902,<ref>{{Cite newspaper The Times |title=Naval & Military intelligence |date=7 May 1902 |page=10 |issue=36761}}</ref> and paid off at [[HMNB Devonport|Devonport]] on 28 May.<ref>{{Cite newspaper The Times |title=Naval & Military intelligence |date=10 May 1902 |page=8 |issue=36764}}</ref> She was in Fleet Reserve until 1904, from when she served finally as guard ship at [[Bermuda]]<ref>Conway p6</ref> until her sale there in 1907.

==Notes==
{{reflist}}


== References ==
== References ==
* {{cite book|last=Ballard |first=G. A., Admiral|authorlink=George Alexander Ballard |title=The Black Battlefleet |year=1980 |publisher=Naval Institute Press |location=Annapolis, Maryland|isbn=0-87021-924-3}}
* Oscar Parkes ''British Battleships'' ISBN 0-85052-604-3
* Conway ''All the World's Fighting Ships'' ISBN 0-85177-133-5
* Oscar Parkes ''British Battleships'' {{ISBN|0-85052-604-3}}
* {{cite book|title=Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905|editor1-last=Chesneau|editor1-first=Roger|editor2-last=Kolesnik|editor2-first=Eugene M.|publisher=Conway Maritime Press|location=Greenwich|year=1979|isbn=0-8317-0302-4|name-list-style=amp|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/conwaysallworlds0000unse_l2e2}}


==External links==
==External links==
<!-- non-breaking space to keep AWB drones from altering the space before the navbox -->
{{Commons category|HMS Rupert (1872)}}
{{Commons category|HMS Rupert (ship, 1872)}}
{{British ironclads}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Rupert (1872)}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Rupert (1872)}}
[[Category:Battleships of the Royal Navy]]
[[Category:Battleships of the Royal Navy]]
[[Category:Chatham-built ships]]
[[Category:Ships built in Chatham]]
[[Category:1872 ships]]
[[Category:1872 ships]]
[[Category:Victorian era battleships of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Victorian-era battleships of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Steam rams]]

Latest revision as of 13:14, 19 February 2024

Rupert circa. 1890
History
United Kingdom
NameHMS Rupert
BuilderChatham Dockyard
Laid down6 June 1870
Launched12 March 1872
Completed1 July 1874
FateBroken up, 1907
General characteristics
Typeturret ram battleship
Displacement5,440 long tons (5,527 t)
Length250 ft (76 m)
Beam53 ft (16 m)
Draught22 ft 6 in (6.86 m)
Propulsion
  • Two-shaft Napier
  • 4,630 ihp (3,453 kW)
Speed13.6 knots (15.7 mph; 25.2 km/h)
Complement217
Armament
Armour
  • Belt: 11 in (280 mm) tapering to 9 in (230 mm)
  • Breastwork: 12 in (300 mm)
  • Turret: 14 in (360 mm) face, 12 in (300 mm) sides
  • Conning tower: 12 in (300 mm)
  • Deck: 3 in (76 mm) tapering to 2 in (51 mm)

HMS Rupert was a battleship of the Victorian Royal Navy, whose principal weapon was designed to be her ram.

Design[edit]

Right elevation and plan as depicted in Brassey's Naval Annual 1888

She was similar in design to HMS Hotspur, but unlike her carried a revolving turret similar to that carried in HMS Glatton. For reasons not recorded, it would appear that the belief prevalent at the time of the design of Hotspur that a ramming attack would damage the turret mechanism no longer held sway when Rupert was proposed.

As was Hotspur, she was designed at a time, shortly after the 1866 battle of Lissa, when it was believed that ramming attacks would, in the event of naval conflict, be the most effective form of offensive action. Artillery power was therefore given second priority to handiness and to frontal armour, including a prolongation of the belt armour to reinforce the ram. She carried two guns in her single turret, as against the single piece in Hotspur, but there was no intention or expectation of achieving all-round fire. The guns would bear from the bow to just abaft the beam on either side, except for the obstruction of the foremast and associated shrouds.

The ship was fitted with a fore-and-aft rig on her two masts, which had been designed to allow progress in the event of engine failure. Her sail effort was, however, described by her first Captain as "not worth the inconvenience of keeping them up".

As the ram had only been seen to be effective against stationary targets, as at the battle of Lissa, and against friendly ships in the course of accidental collision, the high reputation it enjoyed is not wholly understandable. A report by Capt. W.E. Gordon, submitted to the Board of Admiralty in February 1878 and referring to Rupert says: "she is a comparatively simple weapon within the capacity of an ordinary man to make the best use of, whereas the Captain of the Alexandra or Temeraire in action would be like a man armed with sword, rapier, rifle and pistol, trying to use them all at the same time. No man's faculties are equal to making the best use of such complicated machines." The unattributed comments to this report include the phrase "good in theory but not practicable supposing enemy has 14–15 knots and Rupert 11-12".

Unlike every other battleship, Rupert did not have a centre-line conning tower. Uniquely, she possessed two armoured pilot towers, one on either side just abaft the waist. These gave a good view on the beam, but very limited view over the bow, and her first captain described them as "almost useless".

Service history[edit]

Floating of the Twin-Screw Ram Rupert at Chatham

She was commissioned at Devonport Dockyard for the Mediterranean, and served there from 1876 to 1880. She was thereafter held in reserve at Portsmouth until being assigned to service in the Particular Service Squadron during the Russian war scare of April to August; 1885. She was then assigned as guard ship at Hull until 1890. After reconstruction and re-armament between 1891 and 1893 she was guardship at Pembroke until 1895. She was port guard ship at Gibraltar from 1895, then at Port Said until late April 1902, when she returned home.[1] Commander Algernon B Granville Grenfell was appointed in command in May 1898. She arrived at Plymouth in early May 1902,[2] and paid off at Devonport on 28 May.[3] She was in Fleet Reserve until 1904, from when she served finally as guard ship at Bermuda[4] until her sale there in 1907.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ "Naval & Military intelligence". The Times. No. 36751. London. 25 April 1902. p. 8.
  2. ^ "Naval & Military intelligence". The Times. No. 36761. London. 7 May 1902. p. 10.
  3. ^ "Naval & Military intelligence". The Times. No. 36764. London. 10 May 1902. p. 8.
  4. ^ Conway p6

References[edit]

External links[edit]