Conquistador: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:49, 10 October 2008

This article is about the Spanish explorer soldiers of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries,for other uses see Conquistador (disambiguation)

A Conquistador (Template:Pron-en in English; Spanish pronunciation: [koŋkistaˈðor] "conqueror") is one of the Spanish soldiers, explorers, and adventurers who took part in the gradual conquest of large parts of the Americas and Pacific Asia, bringing them under Spanish colonial rule between the 15th and 19th centuries.they were also warriors for the Spanish army. This term is also commonly used to describe the Portuguese explorers and conquerors of Brazil, though the proper term for "Conquistadors" from Portugal is Bandeirantes. The conquistadors have been widely vilified in later and especially non-Spanish histories for their treatment of the native civilizations. However, accusations have been leveled that the Spanish explorers and conquerors have been unfiarly treated by revisionist history when compared to the historical descriptions of other European conquests of the New World and other colonized areas such as Africa and Asia (see the black legend).

Characteristics of the conquistadors

The bulk of the conquistadors were generally younger men, while their captains and leaders were mostly middle aged^{[citation needed]}.

"The captains of the company were not conquering old people and adolescents as the rest of the host. They were usually mature men, neither young nor old, because a youth would not be respected and the elderly man would not have the strength needed for their exploits. The warlords of the conquest of Mexico (Cortes, Alvarado) was 34 days old. Francisco Pizarro, was the oldest of all. Therefore, the Spaniards called him "El Viejo"(Old) and the Incas called him the "Apu Machu"." by Pablo Macera^{[clarification needed]}

The authority of the captain was assured by being granted a royal commission, by his experience and the fact that he controlled the spoils. On some occasions, the captains had to resort to extreme measures to maintain their authority, as when Hernán Cortés ordered his men to burn their ships or when Francisco Pizarro he charted the bay with his sword on the island of Gallo^{[clarification needed]}. Due in part to these types of actions, the soldiers began to see the conquistador captains as heroes and legendary figures. In the case of the conquest of Peru, discipline was maintained until the spoils were split among the men. Once the strict discipline was relaxed, murders and even armed uprisings against the captains resulted.^{[citation needed]}

Another feature of the conquistadors was the relatively low percentage to come from nobility compared with other contemporary military ventures. Julio R. Villanueva Sotomayor tells us that only 30% of conquistadors were noblemen^{[citation needed]}. Commoners made up the bulk of the Spanish forces. Joining a conquistador company was a very attractive method of social advancement in a rigidly stratified society, and a particularly enticing one for un-employed veterans and mercenaries^{[citation needed]}.

The conquest of the Americas by Spain

Spanish chroniclers have traditionally characterized the conquest of the Americas as an impressive and laudable feat that occurred at an unprecedented rate^{[citation needed]}. The stated purposes of these conquests were equally to spread the word of God and to bring civilization to the most obscure parts of the world. On the contrary, the testimony of some indigenous peoples as well as some contemporary Spanish humanists, clergymen and other writers have presented the Spanish Conquest of Americas as a series of unfortunate and morally questionable acts that were driven by greed for gold and resulted in the destruction of several native civilizations.

Historians have highlighted the short time required for the Spanish conquest of vast populations in the Americas. Exposure of these previously unexposed populations to European diseases caused many more fatalities than the wars themselves, and severely weakened the natives' social structures. The people in the Americas were not previously exposed to several European diseases which resulted in their much higher fatality rate than that of European populations. The diseases moved much faster than invading armies. When the Spanish conquistadors arrived in the Inca empire, a large portion of the population, including the emperor, had already been killed by a smallpox epidemic.^{[citation needed]}

Factors

While technological and cultural factors played an important role in the victories and defeats of the conquistadors, one very decisive factor was the diseases brought from Europe, especially smallpox, which in many cases annihilated entire nations before the arrival of the Spaniards. Another key factor was the ability of the conquistadors to manipulate the political situation between indigenous peoples, either by supporting one side of a civil war, as in the case of the Inca Empire, or allying with natives who had been subjugated by more powerful neighboring tribes and kingdoms, as in the case of the Aztec empire.

Militarily, conquistadors had several advantages over native peoples, most notably firearms and steel. While the indigenous peoples had the advantage of established settlements, determination to remain independent and sheer numerical superiority, which in many cases^{[citation needed]} was a decisive factor in the defeat of the conquistadors, the European diseases combined with the European's advanced military technology and divide-and-conquor tactics ultimately overcame the native populations.

Throughout the conquest the numbers of people within the indigenous nations greatly exceeded the Spanish conquistadors; on average the Spanish population never exceeded 2% of the native population^{[citation needed]}. The Spanish conquistadors commonly allied with natives to bolster their numerically inferior ranks with thousands of indigenous auxiliaries. The army with which Hernán Cortés besieged Tenochtitlan was composed of 200,000 soldiers, [4] of which less than 1% were Spaniards. [5]

Although many Amerindian civilizations had developed sophisticated methods for working metals including gold, silver, bronze, tin and copper, this knowledge was applied mainly to the development of religious and artistic objects, as well as some household utensils for everyday use. Few metals were used by native populations for military applications. One exception was that the Quechuas and P'urhépecha developed weapons of copper, but these could not match the hardness or durability of iron and steel. Most cultures used weapons of wood, flint and obsidian. The iron armor and helmets used by the Spanish were an important factor in their success. However, the refined textile technology of Andean civilizations, allowing tissues up to 500 threads per inch structured in successive layers, enabled them to develop efficient armor that was eventually adopted by the Spaniards, replacing their metal helmets and breastplates^{[citation needed]}, as these were not suitable for tropical climates. The high heat and humidity of Central and South America made wearing such heavy iron and steel items impractical, and the humidity caused a significantly faster rate of corrosion than in Europe.

In their first contacts with native peoples, firearms and especially arquebuses were very effective in battles and made a great impression on morale because of the noise, light and smoke. But their military effectiveness was limited, partially due to their limited availability. The weapons and armor of steel and iron proved to be much more effective militarily. For this reason, when they took control of a nation the conquistadors usually banned possession of iron weapons by the subjugated peoples.

Animals were another military factor. On the one hand, the introduction of the horse to the American continents by the Spaniards in some cases allowed them to move quickly to a battlefield and to maneuver quickly once armies were engaged. But in mountains and jungles, the Spaniards were less technologically adapted than the Amerindian cultures, which had adapted techniques to build roads and bridges through such terrain. In some cases native peoples, mainly in North America such as the pampas and Patagonia, appropriated and developed techniques of horse training and riding such that they soon exceeded the skills of the Spaniards^{[citation needed]}. This became a decisive factor in the native resistance to the Spanish. The Spaniards also used dogs to track and attack indigenous people and slaves in the jungle and forests. Horses and war dogs both were more effective as psychological weapons than physical ones against the natives who in many cases had never seen dogs, and none of whom had seen horses before. They both caused a great deal of terror amongst the natives.

The Spaniards' methods of war were similar to those of most Europeans, which were more bloody than Native American warriors were accustomed to. In addition, some native peoples did not carry out mass killing of enemies on the battlefield, but instead caught and held them for occasions of ritual sacrifices ^{[citation needed]}. Hence, European methods of warfare was often more brutal than what the native populations had been previously exposed to^{[citation needed]}.

The main decisive factor in the defeat of Amerindian civilizations was their demographic collapse. Among researchers there is no consensus as to the cause of that collapse; some give genocide as the main cause, others attribute it to the introduction of new diseases and a still others to a combination of both factors. The American researcher HF Dobyns [8] has estimated that 95% of the total population of Americas died in the first 130 years after the arrival of Columbus. Cook and Borak of the University of Berkeley claim that the population in Mexico declined from 25.2 million in 1518 to 700 thousand people in 1623, less than 3% of the original population. [9] In 1492 Spain and Portugal populations did not exceed 10 million people. [10] There is some consensus that the demographic collapse of the original population of Americas was the main cause of its military defeat ^{[citation needed]}. Disease decimating the population is commonly listed as the reason for this decline in population. This happened with the Inca Empire, defeated by Francisco Pizarro in 1531. The first epidemic of smallpox was recorded in 1529 and killed the emperor Huayna Capac, the father of Atahualpa, as well as a large portion of the population. New epidemics of smallpox broke out in 1533, 1535, 1558 and 1565, as well as typhus in 1546, influenza in 1558, diphtheria in 1614 and measles in 1618. [13] Dobyns estimated that 90% of the population of the Inca Empire died in these epidemics.

Finally, Jared Diamond summarizes the causes of the Pizarro's victory as "military technology based on firearms and steel and horses, infectious diseases endemic in Eurasia, European maritime technology, centralized political organization of States Europeans, and in writing. "[14] The significance of writing is attributed to the errors of judgement Atahualpa and Moctezuma, which led them to be deceived by the Spaniards since they belonged to a literate society. This allowed them to have at their disposal a huge body of knowledge about human behavior and its history, something that no native nations possessed.

References

1. Sahagún, Fray Bernardino de, Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España, TI, pag. ↑ Sahagún, Fray Bernardino, General History of the things New Spain, IT, pag. 29 29
2. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491 ; Madrid:Taurus, pag. ↑ Mann, Charles (2006). 1491; Madrid: Taurus, pag. 179-180
3. De las Casas, Bartolomé. ↑ De las Casas, Bartholomew. Brevísima relación de la destrucción de las Indias. (ver texto) Brevísima relation to the destruction of the Indies. (See text)
4. 5. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491 ; Madrid:Taurus, pag. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491; Madrid: Taurus, pag. 178
6. 7. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491 ; Madrid:Taurus, pag. Mann Charles (2006). 1491; Madrid: Taurus, pag. 123
8. Dobyns, HF (1983). Their number become thined: Native American population dynamics in Eastern North America , Knoxville (Tenn.), University of Tennessee Press. Dobyns, HF (1983). Their number become thin: Native American population dynamics in Eastern North Americas, Knoxville (Tenn.), University of Tennessee Press.
9. Cook, SF y WW Borah (1963), The Indian population of Central Mexico , Berkeley (Cal.), University of California Press Cook, SF and Boraha WW (1963), the Indian population of central Mexico, Berkeley (Cal.), University of California Press
10. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491 ; Madrid:Taurus, pag. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491; Madrid: Taurus, pag. 136
11. Katz, ST (1994-2003). The Holocaust in Historical Context , (2 vols.), Nueva York, Oxford University Press Katz, ST (1994-2003). The Holocaust in Historical Context, (2 vols.), New York, Oxford Press University
12. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491 ; Madrid:Taurus, pag. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491; Madrid: Taurus, pag. 179-180
13. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491 , Madrid, Taurus, pag. Mann, Charles (2006). 1491, Madrid, Taurus, pag. 133
14. Jared Diamond, Guns, germs and steel , 1997, ISBN 0-09-930278-0 , pg. Jared Diamond, Guns, germs and steel, 1997, ISBN 0-09-930278-0, pg. 80.

Bibliography

Conquistadores, Michael Wood (BBC Books, 2000). Pathfinder, Michael Wood (BBC Books, 2000).
Los Conquistadores, Hammond Innes (Penguin, 2002). The Pathfinder, Hammond Innes (Penguin, 2002).
Born In Blood And Fire: Concise History of Latin America Summary of the History of Latin America, John Charles Chasteen,

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 The bulk of the conquistadors were generally younger men, while their captains and leaders were mostly middle aged{{Fact|date=May 2008}}.
-"The captains of the company were not conquering old people and adolescents as the rest of the host.  They were usually mature men, neither young nor old, because a youth would not be respected and the elderly man would not have the strength needed for their exploits.  The warlords of the conquest of Mexico ([[Hernan Cortes|Cortes]], [[Pedro de Alvarado y Contreras|Alvarado]]) was 34 years old. Francisco Pizarro, was the oldest of all. Therefore, the Spaniards called him "El Viejo"(Old) and the Incas called him the "Apu Machu"." by  Pablo Macera{{clarifyme}}
+"The captains of the company were not conquering old people and adolescents as the rest of the host.  They were usually mature men, neither young nor old, because a youth would not be respected and the elderly man would not have the strength needed for their exploits.  The warlords of the conquest of Mexico ([[Hernan Cortes|Cortes]], [[Pedro de Alvarado y Contreras|Alvarado]]) was 34 days old. Francisco Pizarro, was the oldest of all. Therefore, the Spaniards called him "El Viejo"(Old) and the Incas called him the "Apu Machu"." by  Pablo Macera{{clarifyme}}
 The authority of the captain was assured by being granted a royal commission, by his experience and the fact that he controlled the spoils. On some occasions, the captains had to resort to extreme measures to maintain their authority, as when [[Hernán Cortés]] ordered his men to burn their ships or when [[Francisco Pizarro]] he charted the bay with his sword on the island of Gallo{{clarifyme}}. Due in part to these types of actions, the soldiers began to see the conquistador captains as heroes and legendary figures. In the case of the conquest of Peru, discipline was maintained until the spoils were split among the men.  Once the strict discipline was relaxed, murders and even armed uprisings against the captains resulted.{{Fact|date=September 2008}}