Special good
As a special material which designates literary-critical research on the New Testament those texts of the three Synoptic Gospels , which occur in only one Gospel, are thus without parallel text.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/thumb/4/4e/Synoptische_Beziehungen_1.jpg/400px-Synoptische_Beziehungen_1.jpg)
Special good in the Gospel of Mark
The Markinian special property consists of those texts which, according to the two-source theory, were not adopted from Mt and Lk (4.9% of the text or 549 words). The special goods include:
- Sabbath saying ( Mk 2.27 EU )
- The judgment of the relatives on Jesus ( Mk 3.20-21 EU )
- Parable of the self-growing seed ( Mk 4,26–29 EU )
- Healing of a deaf and mute ( Mk 7.31–37 EU )
- Healing of a blind man ( Mk 8.22-26 EU )
- Quote from Isaiah 66.24 ( Mk 9.48 EU )
- Of the salt ( Mk 9.49 EU )
- Note from the young man fleeing naked ( Mk 14.51–52 EU )
- Pilate's amazement at the speedy death of Jesus ( Mk 15.44 EU )
The healing of a deaf and mute and a blind person is done with the use of saliva . Their omission from Matt and Luke is mostly explained psychologically - as Christologically offensive. It can not be explained with the two-source theory .
Special good in the Gospel of Matthew
The Matthew special property comprises about a fifth of the entire Gospel of Matthew. The special goods include:
- the story of the wise men from the east ( Mt 2,1-12 EU )
- the flight to Egypt ( Mt 2,13–15 EU )
- the child murder in Bethlehem ( Mt 2,16-18 EU )
- the return from Egypt ( Mt 2,19-23 EU )
- " On swearing " ( Mt 5,33-37 EU )
- " On giving alms " ( Mt 6 : 1-4 EU )
- " On prayer " ( Mt 6.5-6 EU )
- " On fasting " ( Mt 6,16-18 EU )
- Division for Jesus' sake ( Mt 10.34 ff. EU )
- "Of the weeds under the wheat " ( Mt 13,24-30 EU ) and its interpretation ( Mt 13,36-43 EU )
- "Of the treasure in the field and the precious pearl " ( Mt 13.44-46 EU )
- " From the fishing net " ( Mt 13.47-52 EU )
- Paying the temple tax ( Mt 17.24-27 EU )
- " Of the two debtors " ( Mt 18,23-35 EU )
- Correction and prayer in the church ( Mt 18.15-20 EU )
- " Of the workers in the vineyard " ( Mt 20.1–16 EU )
- " Of the unequal sons " ( Mt 21,28-32 EU )
- " Of the ten virgins " ( Mt 25 : 1–13 EU )
- of the Last Judgment ( Mt 25,31-46 EU )
- the story of the guardians of the grave ( Mt 27.62–66 EU ) including its continuation ( Mt 28.11–15 EU )
- Conclusion of the gospel with the command of a mission ( Mt 28 : 16-20 EU )
Special good in the Gospel of Luke
The Lukan special property comprises about a third of the entire Gospel of Luke; If you also include individual verses that are in the middle of other texts, it is around 45 percent. These include:
- The promise of the birth of the Baptist ( Lk 1.5–25 EU ), The visit of Mary to Elizabeth ( Lk 1.39–56 EU ), The birth of the Baptist ( Lk 1.57–80 EU )
- Trip to Bethlehem, based on a census, birth in a stable ( Lk 2.1–8 EU )
- The story of the shepherds ( Lk 2.9–20 EU )
- The testimony of Simeon and Hannah about Jesus ( Lk 2,21-40 EU )
- The twelve year old Jesus in the temple ( Lk 2.41–52 EU )
- the subject of “tax collectors and sinners” (7.34 EU ; 7.36–50 EU ; 18.9-14 EU ; 19.1–10 EU ; 15.1–2 EU and the the following parables of the prodigal sheep ( Lk 15.4–7 EU ), of the lost penny ( Lk 15.8–10 EU ), of the prodigal son ( Lk 15.11–32 EU ))
- The parable of the Good Samaritan ( Lk 10.30–35 EU )
- the episode of the thief on the cross ( Lk 23.39–43 EU )
- the Emmaus story ( Lk 24 : 13–35 EU )
- the motive of the despised Samaritans ( Lk 10.29–37 EU ; 17.11–19 EU )
- but also the special role of women (cf. the notes on Maria Lk 2.19 EU ; 2.34 EU ; 8.1–3 EU etc.)
See also
Remarks
- ^ AM Honoré: A Statistical Study of the Synoptic Problem. Nov. test. 10: 95-147 (1968). Problems with these statistics are discussed in John J. O'Rourke: Some Observations on the Synoptic Problem and the Use of Statistical procedures. In: David E. Orton (Ed.): The Synoptic Problem and Q: Selected Studies from Novum Testamentum. Brill: Leiden 1999, p. 134, ISBN 90-0411342-8 .
- ↑ Eta Linnemann: Is there a synoptic problem? , VTR, Nuremberg 1999, p. 86.