Noetherian room

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Noetherian topological space , named after Emmy Noether , is a mathematical term from the branch of topology . It is motivated by the algebraic concept of Noether's ring and is mainly used in algebraic geometry .

definition

If one considers open sets of a topological space in analogy to the ideals of a ring , the following definition is obvious with a view to the concept of Noether's ring:

  • A topological space is called Noetherian if every ascending chain of open sets becomes stationary, that is: If there is a family of open sets, there is one with for all .

As in algebra, a simple argument shows:

  • A topological space is Noetherian if and only if there is a maximum condition for open sets , that is: Every non-empty family of open sets contains a maximal element .

Since the closed sets are exactly the complements of open sets, one has:

  • A topological space is Noetherian if and only if every descending chain of closed sets becomes stationary, that is: If there is a family of closed sets, there is one with for all .
  • A topological space is Noetherian if and only if a minimal condition for closed sets holds, that is: Every non-empty family of closed sets contains a minimal element .

Examples

  • Spaces with finite topologies, especially topological spaces with a finite basic set, are Noetherian.
  • The affine space over a body with the Zariski topology a Noetherian space.
  • with the Euclidean topology is not Noetherian, because the open intervals form an ascending sequence of open sets that does not become stationary.

meaning

The Zariski topology is usually viewed on the spectrum of a ring . It is easy to show that the spectrum of a Noetherian commutative ring is a Noetherian topological space. Since affine varieties correspond to the radical ideals in the ring of polynomials in finitely many variables over the coordinate field ( Hilbert's zero theorem ), and this ring is Noetherian ( Hilbert's basis theorem ), one obtains that affine varieties with the Zariski topology are Noetherian. Hence, this term plays a role in algebraic geometry in which such varieties are studied.

application

In particular, an affine variety consists of finitely many irreducible components.

Since the simple proof clarifies the typical Noetherian inference, it should be reproduced here briefly: Let be the set of all closed subsets that are not a finite union of irreducible sets. If it is assumed that this set is not empty, it contains a minimal element because of the minimum condition for closed sets . As an element of, this can not be irreducible, so it is a union of two true closed sets and . As is minimal, are and not and therefore finite union of irreducible amounts. But then there is also a finite union of irreducible sets, which is a contradiction in terms. Therefore it is empty, in particular space itself, is a finite union of irreducible sets, what was to be shown.

compactness

If compactness is defined by the covering property and if the Hausdorff property is dispensed with , some authors then also speak of quasi-compact spaces, the following applies:

  • Every Noetherian space is quasi-compact.
  • A topological space is Noetherian if and only if every subset is quasi-compact with the relative topology .

Other properties

  • Every subspace of a Noetherian space is again Noetherian.
  • If the topological space is a union of the subspaces and if each is Noetherian, then it is also Noetherian.

Individual evidence

  1. ^ Ernst Kunz: Introduction to Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry , Vieweg (1980), ISBN 3-528-07246-6 , definition I.2.13
  2. ^ Ernst Kunz: Introduction to commutative algebra and algebraic geometry , Vieweg (1980), ISBN 3-528-07246-6 , sentence I.2.14
  3. ^ IG MacDonald: Algebraic Geometry, Introduction to Schemes , WA Benjamin Inc. (1968), Chapter 2: Noetherian Spaces
  4. IG MacDonald: Algebraic Geometry, Introduction to Schemes , WA Benjamin Inc. (1968), Theorem (2.2) (ii)
  5. ^ IG MacDonald: Algebraic Geometry, Introduction to Schemes , WA Benjamin Inc. (1968), Theorem (2.2) (iii)