Ping pong lemma

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the mathematical field of group theory , the ping-pong lemma is a method for constructing free subgroups of a group. It is attributed to Felix Klein , who used it in the 1870s as "the process of nesting" in the study of Kleinian groups . The formulation given below goes back to Jacques Tits , who used it in the early 1970s (as "a criterion of freedom") to prove the Tits alternative .

Ping pong lemma

A group works in one room . Let be nontrivial subgroups with at least three elements and let there be disjoint subsets such that for all

and inclusion for everyone

applies. Then is a free product .

example

The ones from the matrices

and

The created subgroup is a free group.

To prove this, consider the linear action and apply the ping-pong lemma to the subsets

on.

More generally, the ping-pong lemma is used to prove the lemma of Sanov : If there are complex numbers with , then generate

and

a free subset of .

Applications

  • In the theory of Klein's groups one can use the ping-pong lemma for the construction of Schottky groups : one has pairwise disjoint circular disks in and for there are mappings , each of which map the interior of bijective to the exterior of . Then the subgroup created by is a free group called a Schottky group. It can be shown that every non-elementary Klein group contains a Schottky group of rank .
  • The ping-pong lemma was used in proving the tits alternative . In its classic form, this said that a finitely generated and not almost resolvable subgroup of contains a free subgroup; it can now also be proven more generally for finitely generated and not almost resolvable subgroups, for example of hyperbolic groups , mapping class groups and automorphism groups of free groups.

literature

Pierre de la Harpe. Topics in geometric group theory. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ISBN 0-226-31719-6 ; Ch. II.B "The table tennis lemma (Klein's criterion) and examples of free products"

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. ^ Proposition 1.1 in: Tits, J .: "Free subgroups in linear groups". Journal of Algebra 20 (2), 250-270 (1972). online (pdf)