Certified Mediator Training Ordinance

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Basic data
Title: Certified Mediator Training Ordinance
Abbreviation: ZMediatAusbV
Type: Federal Ordinance
Scope: Federal Republic of Germany
Issued on the basis of: Section 6 MediationsG
Legal matter: Administration of justice
References : 302-7-1
Issued on: August 21, 2016
( Federal Law Gazette I, p. 1994 )
Entry into force on: 1st September 2017
Weblink: Text of the regulation
Please note the note on the applicable legal version.

The Regulation on the training of certified mediators (Certified mediators Training Ordinance - ZMediatAusbV) of 21 August 2016 a Regulation of the Federal . It regulates the education and training of certified mediators as well as the requirements for the education and training institutions.

content

The regulation stipulates:

  • The training comprises at least 120 hours of attendance on given content ( § 2 ZMediatAusbV). As part of the training, the mediator also has to carry out a mediation as a mediator or co-mediator and then work on it in individual supervision ( § 2 ZMediatAusbV), and
  • Within two years of completing the training, the mediator has to take part in individual supervision at least four more times, again in each case following a mediation carried out as a mediator or co-mediator ( § 5 ZMediatAusbV).
  • The certified mediator must regularly take part in advanced training events amounting to at least 40 hours in a four-year period ( Section 3 ZMediatAusbV).
  • Trainers must ensure that teachers have a professional qualification from vocational training or a university degree and have the specialist skills required for training or advanced training ( Section 5 ZMediatAusbV).
  • Training completed abroad for at least 90 hours ( § 6 ZMediatAusbV) is recognized.
  • There are transitional provisions for mediators who have already been trained ( Section 7 ZMediatAusbV).

The ordinance has an annex on the content and scope of the training course.

Further developments

The transition period of one year after the ordinance has been issued does not come into force until one year after its enactment. According to the resolution recommendation, this gives "the relevant mediator and professional associations, the professional chambers and the chambers of industry and commerce as well as other social groups in the interests of comparability of training and quality assurance the opportunity to agree on a uniform procedure on a voluntary basis, which the Certification of training institutes, which then carry out the training to become a certified mediator and issue the corresponding certificates for the participants, is made possible by a body organized under private law. "There it is also specified that a corresponding supplement to the statutory authorization according to § 6 must be checked if an agreement is reached does not take place on a voluntary basis on a body for the certification of the training providers.

The mediation associations (BAFM, BM, BMWA, DFfM and DGM), the Federal Bar Association (BRAK), the German Bar Association (DAV), the German Chamber of Industry and Commerce (DIHK) and the Federal Chamber of Notaries (BNotK) have been able to meet so far (as of March 2017 ) do not agree on a common accreditation body for training to become a certified mediator.

criticism

There is criticism that there is no independent body that would review, confirm and monitor the quality standards. In contrast to this, there are, for example, accredited certification bodies for the certification of experts according to the international standard DIN EN ISO / IEC 17024/2012, and these are monitored by the German accreditation body.

It is also doubtful whether a single supervised mediation case is sufficient as the initial practical experience required for certification.

There is also criticism that less demands are placed on training completed abroad than on training at home. Reinhard Greger criticized that the regulation gave the impression of discrimination against domestic training courses . In addition, Martin Fries noticed a contradiction in the requirement for 120 hours of attendance, "because training content is increasingly being conveyed online and there are certainly technical possibilities to check the attentiveness of course participants through automatic interaction."

See also

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. Page no longer available , search in web archives: BT-Drucks. 17/8058 , p. 18.@1@ 2Template: Dead Link / www.bmjv.de
  2. No agreement: Quo vadis »Joint certification body«? In: Mediation aktuell. Wolfgang Metzner Verlag, March 2, 2017, accessed on May 28, 2017 .
  3. ^ A b c Jürgen G. Heim: First voices on the new ZMediatAusbV. In: Mediation aktuell. August 31, 2016, accessed September 22, 2016 .
  4. Martin Fries: Synopsis of the Certified Mediator Training Ordinance (ZMediatAusbV). In: www.mediatorenausbildung.org. September 1, 2016, accessed September 22, 2016 .