Roman Deutinger

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Roman Deutinger (* 1970 in Osterhofen ) is a German historian who researches the history of the early and high Middle Ages . His research interests are in the historiography of the High and Late Middle Ages, the history of the Church and canon law, early medieval diplomacy and the constitutional history of the early and high Middle Ages, with particular emphasis on the development of feudalism .

Live and act

academic career

Roman Deutinger comes from a family of teachers and attended the Benedictine high school in Niederaltaich Abbey . He then studied history, Latin and musicology at the University of Regensburg . Horst Fuhrmann was one of his academic teachers . In 1992/93 a study visit to Uppsala followed . Using Swedish sources, he wrote an essay on the Swedish devastation in Bavaria in 1646/48. In the summer of 1995 the Magister followed in Regensburg with a thesis on Rufinus von Sorrento supervised by Wilfried Hartmann . The work was included in the renowned publication series of the Monumenta Germaniae Historica . In 1996/97 he received a scholarship from the educational history graduate college “Ars and Scientia in the Middle Ages and in the Early Modern Era” at the University of Tübingen. Deutinger received his doctorate in 1998 with a thesis inspired by Franz Fuchs and supervised by Wilfried Hartmann in Tübingen on the life and work of the scholar Rahewins von Freising from an educational history perspective. The work was assessed with summa cum laude and was also included in the publication series of the Monumenta Germaniae Historica. In 2000, Deutinger received the scientific advancement award of the Stauferstiftung Göppingen for the dissertation.

In 1998/99 Deutinger was a research assistant at the history seminar of the TU Braunschweig . Since 1999 he has been a research assistant for the Fontium Historiae Medii Aevi repertory at the Bavarian Academy of Sciences . His habilitation took place in the 2004/05 winter semester at the University of Munich (LMU) with an examination of the royal rule in the East Franconian Empire . In the 2005 summer semester, Deutinger represented Wilfried Hartmann in the chair for Medieval History at the University of Tübingen. In the 2005/06 winter semester he was Eva Schlotheuber's senior assistant in Medieval History at the LMU. In the winter semester 2009/10 he was a substitute professor for medieval history at the Catholic University of Eichstätt . In 2012 he was appointed adjunct professor. In the 2013/14 winter semester, Deutinger was a substitute professor for Bavarian regional history at the University of Regensburg.

Historiography of the High and Late Middle Ages

In his 1997 edition of the treatise De bono pacis ( On the Good of Peace ), Deutinger sees the 1986 edition by Aldo Brunacci and Giuseppe Catanzaro as "extremely flawed". Deutinger rejects the usual identification of the author Rufinus with the canonist Rufinus, who wrote his Summa decretorum around 1164 . Instead, he is considering a monk from the Benedictine monastery of Montecassino . This monk had presented the writing to his abbot Peter II of Montecassino before the Peace of Venice, i.e. between 1174 and 1177. He attests to the author Rufinus "an extremely broad horizon and downright world-historical perspectives". At the same time he characterizes Rufinus as “completely unaffected by the theological, philosophical, historical, legal, political or other literature of his time.” He describes Rufin's work as “an outsider” who “boldly pioneered thoughts in the biblical and early church tradition seeks to anchor ”and at the same time pursues the intention of working towards“ a pragmatic peace in a thoroughly unpeaceful time ”. Rufinus has "reached a completely new level in the consideration not only of peace theology, but of the world as a whole".

Deutinger dedicated his dissertation published in 1999 to Rahewin von Freising. Until then, an overall assessment of Rahewin was a research gap. The work consists of three parts: the biography of the cleric (7–26), the Gesta Friderici of the historian (27–178) and the poetry of the poet (179–201). In the appendix he presented for the first time a complete edition of the unfinished didactic poem Flosculus . Since Bernhard von Simson (1911) and the research based on it by Franz-Josef Schmale (1963), the number of surviving manuscripts has increased from 18 to 26 thanks to a series of new finds. The importance of Deutinger's work lies in the fact that he records and classifies the manuscripts to a much greater extent than has been done in research up to now. In doing so, Schmales' results are revised with regard to Review A, which can be traced back to a humanistic revision of the 15th century. Rahewin probably comes from the Freising-episcopal ministerial family of the Lohkirchen-Bercha. He contradicts the previous view that Rahewin studied in Paris because of his extensive education. The prerequisites for this are also possible on the Freisinger Domberg. For Deutinger Rahewin belonged "to that group of scholars of the second or perhaps even third rank who received the new thoughts and methods".

In his analysis of imperial concepts in court-related historiography in the 12th century, Deutinger was unable to identify any “ Staufer- court ideology”. All that the sources examined have in common is “the idea that one of the emperor's most distinguished tasks is to ensure peace, order and justice in his empire”.

Constitutional history with a focus on feudal affairs

Deutinger presented numerous studies on the feudal system. In more recent research, Deutinger is one of the critics of the view of the feudal system, which was mainly shaped by François Louis Ganshof from the mid-1940s and established until the mid-1980s. The multiple vassality has been dated to the late Carolingian period. A document from Tours from the year 895 cited for this as the supposedly earliest evidence of a vassal of two masters could Deutinger expose as a forgery at the earliest in the 12th century. The scanty evidence from the 10th and early 11th centuries can also be interpreted differently. According to Deutinger, it was only in the 11th century that one could speak of a multiple vassalate. Deutinger found in his observations on fiefdoms in early medieval Bavaria that "from the 8th to the beginning of the 10th century, land lending to vassals was a marginal phenomenon and even the connection of the granting of benefits to any service other than interest payments remained a rare exception". According to his research, the structure of the vassal was “not a suitable instrument for building a multi-level, hierarchically ordered ruling association”. He pointed out that no aftervasal for the Franconian Empire of the 8th and 9th centuries could be proven. According to Deutinger, the feudal declaration of the meeting of 1155 between Frederick I and Hadrian IV is a misinterpretation of the 20th century. At this meeting there was a dispute about the external forms of the reception ceremony. Friedrich refused the Pope the marshal service, that is, holding the stirrup when getting off the horse. Robert Holtzmann interpreted this refusal as a loan. The vassal usually had to do marshal service for his master. Because of his refusal, Frederick did not want to appear as a vassal of the Pope. Deutinger pointed out that not a single one of the timely source reports put the meeting in a feudal context. Achim Thomas Hack had already noticed this a few years earlier . Deutinger also takes a critical look at the different points of view of Knut Görich , Jürgen Miethke and Sebastian Scholz . According to Deutinger's renewed review of the source, it is more a question of a misunderstanding that arose from imprecise agreements in advance. Friedrich by no means refused to serve as a marshal. The details of the ceremony were not precisely planned.

In his habilitation on the royal rule in the late Carolingian era, published in 2006, he dealt with the time from the beginning of the rule of Ludwig the German in 833 to the death of Conrad I in 918. The royal rule is described by Deutinger under the aspect of the “current state of the political Order (or also disorder) ”investigated. The focus is on “servants and loyalists”, “officials and elected officials” and the exercise of power through consensus, relationships and presence. He came to the conclusion that the ruling structure of the East Franconian Empire should be viewed as polycentric and not solely geared towards the king. In contemporary thinking, the empire was “not derived solely from the king, but primarily related to the people, and ultimately a completely independent entity”. The king had to win over and over again all other rulers for their participation in the royal rule. The most important means of rule of the East Frankish kings is therefore consensus . According to Deutinger's work, royal rule was primarily based on consensus, relied heavily on relationships and required a royal presence. There was no profound change in the exercise of power between the 9th and 10th centuries. According to Deutinger, the late Carolingian rulership structures correspond more to the picture that recent research has gained of the Ottonian period: "The Carolingian rule in the East Franconian Empire was more 'Ottonian' than 'Carolingian'."

In 2010, Deutinger and Jürgen Dendorfer published the results of a conference on leanings that took place in Munich in 2008. The starting point was Susan Reynolds' criticism of the previous idea of ​​a feudal system in the mid-1990s. Susan Reynolds' theses on fiefdom for the 12th century empire should be reviewed on the basis of a wide range of sources. The chronological focus of the contributions was therefore also on the 12th century. Deutinger dealt with Friedrich I and Hadrian IV. With his contribution, Deutinger did not want to "offer a comprehensive representation and interpretation of the conflicts between Friedrich I and Hadrian IV". Rather, he looked at the meeting between Frederick and Pope Hadrian in Sutri in June 1155, the dispute over the frescoes in the Lateran Palace in the summer of 1155, and the benefit dispute at the Diet in Besançon (1157) and asked to what extent “explanatory models within the framework of feudalism really help to understand contribute". He was also interested in the question "what these conflicts can tell us about the level of development of feudalism in the middle of the 12th century". The forms and gestures between Emperor and Pope do not necessarily have to be interpreted in a feudal context. However, especially in the 1150s, the feudal system penetrated more strongly into the consciousness of contemporaries as a model of order. Deutinger summarized the results of the conference contributions. It was noted that the change in the feudal system from a bundle of legal customs to a uniform legal institution in the German Empire did not begin until the middle of the 12th century.

At a spring conference in 2011 organized by Karl-Heinz Spieß of the Constance Working Group for Medieval History on the subject of “Training and spreading feudalism in the empire and in Italy in the 12th and 13th centuries”, Deutinger gave a lecture on “From office to fiefdom. The Example of the German Duchies in the High Middle Ages ”. According to his analysis, the sources “did not associate the German duchies with feudal categories until well into the 12th century”. This practice only prevailed in the late Middle Ages . The classical doctrine, which goes back to Heinrich Mitteis , was based on a feudal practice in the award of duchies in Ottonian - Salian times.

Church and Canon Law

In an article published in 2002, Deutinger examined nine terminations from 812 to 1006 from the dioceses of Trier and Mainz. This means the delimitation of a tenth district by the responsible diocesan bishop and the assignment of the thus created district to a specific church. He considers the founding deed of the Gemünden Monastery from 879 to be a forgery of the 13th century.

In an essay published in 2005 he identified the founder of the Osterhofen Canonical Monastery as Duke Heinrich III with the help of a calendar from 1324 . of Bavaria . In contrast, Duke Heinrich V of Bavaria had been the founder of the monastery since the Middle Ages .

In 2014 he and his brother Stephan Deutinger led the conference The Monastery and its Environment. The Niederaltaich Abbey in its relationship structure from the 8th to the 18th century . Despite good sources, the history of the monastery has so far been insufficiently researched in the first two centuries after its foundation shortly before the middle of the 8th century. The articles were published in 2018. In an essay published in 2006, Deutinger reconstructed the series of the individual abbots from Eberswind (before 748– after 762) up to Aaron (dating uncertain) according to Chunibert (before 947 - before 963) from the sources.

Contributions to Bavarian regional history in the Middle Ages

In an essay published in 2002, Deutinger thoroughly revised the prevailing image of an alleged King Arnulf of Bavaria . According to his research, Arnulf's rebellion probably did not take place in 919. The extract from the older Salzburg annals for the year 920 ( Bavarii sponte se reddiderunt Arnolfo duci et regnare eum fecerunt in regno Teutonicorum , i.e .: The Bavarians submitted to Duke Arnulf and raised him to king (literally: let him rule as king)) does not mean that the Bavarian Arnulf has been elected "anti-king", but simply indicates that Arnulf achieved a duke position. While working with Arnulf von Bayern, Deutinger came to another observation about the reign of Konrad I. After reviewing the sources again, Deutinger assumes that the ruler had been ill for a long time before his death. Accordingly, Konrad may not have failed because of the resistance of the “tribal dukes”, but rather “because of the lack of art of his doctors”.

His many years of preoccupation with early medieval legal texts and the older history of Bavaria led to the publication of the Lex Baioariorum in German with detailed explanations in 2017 . With this, Deutinger developed the first and for centuries only comprehensive record of Bavarian law and made it generally accessible. He published further studies for the Lex Lex Baioariorum. Previously, Deutinger tried in an essay based on an excerpt from the Lex Baioariorum, according to which the Bavarian dukes always come from the family of the Agilolfinger , to fathom what was understood by the name or the family in the Middle Ages. According to his research on the agile fingers, one should not think of them "as a closed, uniform, strictly patrilineal and agnatic dynasty, but at best as a loose cognatic association whose genealogical connection cannot be reconstructed". For him, the Agilolfingers were “less of a historical phenomenon than a conceptual construct” of contemporary perception and modern genealogical research. He also examined the handwritten tradition of the Lex Baioariorum in Bavaria and Austria.

In 2017, Deutinger and Christof Paulus published the narrative sources on the princely wedding between the Bavarian duke Georg and the Polish king's daughter Hedwig in Landshut in 1475, summarized in one volume, annotated and provided with a register.

Deutinger dealt with the establishment of Erding . He showed that the alleged founding year 1228 is not based on medieval sources, but on considerations of the mayor and local history researcher Friedrich Herbig from the 1920s. For Herbig, the basis for dating the founding of the city of Erdingen was the first mention of a market in the Herzogsurbar. However, this list of all permanent income of the Bavarian Duke was dated between 1231 and 1234 in recent research. Since the market was already one of the more important and financially lucrative market and customs stations in the Duchy of Bavaria in the 1230s, the place must be significantly older and could not have been founded a few years earlier.

Fonts

Monographs

  • Rufinus of Sorrento. De bono pacis (= Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Studies and Texts. Vol. 17). Hahn, Hannover 1997, ISBN 3-7752-5417-X (also: Regensburg, University, Master's thesis, 1995).
  • Rahewin von Freising. A scholar of the 12th century (= Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Schriften. Vol. 47). Hahn, Hannover 1999, ISBN 3-7752-5447-1 (also: Tübingen, University, dissertation, 1998).
  • Royal rule in the East Franconian Empire. A pragmatic constitutional history of the late Carolingian period (= contributions to the history and source studies of the Middle Ages. Vol. 20). Thorbecke, Ostfildern 2006, ISBN 3-7995-5720-2 (at the same time: Munich, University, habilitation paper, 2004).

Editorships

  • with Jürgen Dendorfer : The feudal system in the high Middle Ages. Research constructs - source findings - relevance to interpretation (= Middle Ages research. Vol. 34). Thorbecke, Stuttgart 2010, ISBN 978-3-7995-4286-9 .
  • Lex Baioariorum. The right of Bavaria. Pustet, Regensburg 2017, ISBN 978-3-7917-2787-5 .
  • with Christof Paulus: The Reich visits Landshut. The narrative texts for the princely wedding of 1475. Thorbecke, Ostfildern 2017, ISBN 3-7995-1155-5 .
  • with Stephan Deutinger: The Niederaltaich Abbey. History, culture and spirituality from the foundation to secularization (= studies and communications on the history of the Benedictine order. Vol. 53). EOS, Sankt Ottilien 2018, ISBN 978-3-8306-7903-5 .

literature

  • Jürgen Hilse: Awarding of the scientific advancement award of the Stauferstiftung Göppingen to Dr. Roman Deutinger. In: Germany and Italy at the time of the Staufer (= writings on Staufer history and art. Vol. 22). Published by the Society for Staufer History, Göppingen 2002, ISBN 3-929776-14-6 , pp. 162–166.

Web links

Remarks

  1. ↑ Jürgen Hilse: Award of the scientific advancement award of the Stauferstiftung Göppingen to Dr. Roman Deutinger. In: Germany and Italy at the time of the Staufer. Göppingen 2002, pp. 162–166, here: p. 162.
  2. ^ Roman Deutinger: Swedish devastation in Bavaria 1646/48. An approach to reinterpretation based on Swedish sources. In: Journal for Bavarian State History . 57 (1994), pp. 719-733, ( digitized version ).
  3. ↑ See the discussions by Johannes Laudage in: Historische Zeitschrift 266 (1998), pp. 730–731; Theo Kölzer in: Historisches Jahrbuch 120 (2000), p. 454; Eugen Hillenbrand in: Innsbrucker Historische Studien 22 (2000), pp. 319-320; Elmar Wadle in: Journal of the Savigny Foundation for Legal History, German Department . 116: 566-567 (1999); Karl Ubl in: Mitteilungen des Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 107 (1999), pp. 195–196; Martin Bertram in: Sources and research from Italian archives and libraries 80 (2000), p. 641 ( digitized version ); Pierre Racine in: Francia 25/1 (1998), pp. 355-356 ( digitized version ); Thomas Vogtherr in: Das Historisch-Politische Buch 46 (1998), p. 315.
  4. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rufinus von Sorrent. De bono pacis. Hanover 1997, p. 40.
  5. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rufinus von Sorrent. De bono pacis. Hanover 1997, p. 13.
  6. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rufinus von Sorrent. De bono pacis. Hanover 1997, p. 19.
  7. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rufinus von Sorrent. De bono pacis. Hanover 1997, p. 22.
  8. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rufinus von Sorrent. De bono pacis. Hanover 1997, p. 20.
  9. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rufinus von Sorrent. De bono pacis. Hanover 1997, p. 22.
  10. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rufinus von Sorrent. De bono pacis. Hanover 1997, p. 28.
  11. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rufinus von Sorrent. De bono pacis. Hanover 1997, p. 27.
  12. ↑ See the reviews of Mireille Chazan in: Francia 28/1 (2001), pp. 346–347 ( digitized version ); Paul Dinter in: Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 37 (2002), pp. 149–151; Andrea Sommerlechner in: Historische Zeitschrift 272 (2001), pp. 733–735; Katherine Walsh in: Innsbrucker Historische Studien 22 (2000), pp. 318–319; Günther Bernhard in: Mitteilungen des Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 109 (2001), pp. 208–211; Kai-Michael Sprenger in: Sources and research from Italian archives and libraries 80 (2000), pp. 733–735 ( digitized version ); Jürgen Miethke in: Patristica et Mediaevalia 22 (2001), pp. 114–115; Thomas Vogtherr in: Das Historisch-Politische Buch 48 (2000), p. 17f.
  13. ↑ See Günther Bernhard in: Mitteilungen des Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 109 (2001), pp. 208–211.
  14. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rahewin von Freising. A 12th century scholar. Hanover 1999, p. 30.
  15. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rahewin von Freising. A 12th century scholar. Hanover 1999, p. 10.
  16. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rahewin von Freising. A 12th century scholar. Hanover 1999, p. 12.
  17. ^ Roman Deutinger: Rahewin von Freising. A 12th century scholar. Hanover 1999, p. 205.
  18. ^ Roman Deutinger: Imperial Concepts in the Court Historiography of the Barbarossa Period. In: Stefan Burkhardt, Thomas Metz, Bernd Schneidmüller, Stefan Weinfurter (Hrsg.): Staufisches Kaisertum in the 12th century. Regensburg 2010, pp. 25–39, here: p. 38.
  19. ^ Roman Deutinger: Imperial Concepts in the Court Historiography of the Barbarossa Period. In: Stefan Burkhardt, Thomas Metz, Bernd Schneidmüller, Stefan Weinfurter (Hrsg.): Staufisches Kaisertum in the 12th century. Regensburg 2010, pp. 25–39, here: p. 36. See also Jan Keupp: “Those who carry the globe ...” Princely elites in the Hohenstaufen empire. In: Wolfram Drews (Ed.): The interaction of rulers and elites in imperial orders of the Middle Ages. Berlin 2018, pp. 229–250, here: p. 233.
  20. ↑ Roman Deutinger: How long has multiple vassalism existed? In: Journal of the Savigny Foundation for Legal History, German Department , Vol. 119 (2002), pp. 78-105. See also: Roman Deutinger: Royal rule in the East Franconian Empire. A pragmatic constitutional history of the late Carolingian era. Ostfildern 2006, pp. 75–93 on the royal vassals.
  21. ^ Roman Deutinger: Observations on feudal beings in early medieval Bavaria. In: Journal for Bavarian State History 70 (2007), pp. 57–83, here: p. 82.
  22. ^ Roman Deutinger: Royal rule in the East Franconian Empire. A pragmatic constitutional history of the late Carolingian era. Ostfildern 2006, p. 86f. Compare with Steffen Patzold: Das Lehnwesen. Munich 2012, p. 38.
  23. ↑ Robert Holtzmann: The Kaiser as Marshal of the Pope. An investigation into the history of the relations between emperor and pope in the Middle Ages. Berlin / Leipzig 1928.
  24. ^ Achim Thomas Hack: The reception ceremony at medieval Pope-Emperor meetings. Cologne 1999, pp. 516-540.
  25. ^ Roman Deutinger: Sutri 1155 Misunderstandings about a misunderstanding. In: German Archive for Research into the Middle Ages 60 (2004), pp. 97-133 ( digitized version ).
  26. ↑ See the discussions by Stephan Freund in: Passauer Jahrbuch 50 (2008), pp. 335–336; Georg Scheibelreiter in: German Archive for Research into the Middle Ages, Vol. 64 (2008), pp. 260–262 ( digitized version ); Hans-Werner Goetz in: sehepunkte 7 (2007), No. 7/8 [15. July 2007], ( online ); Brigitte Merta in: Mitteilungen des Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 118 (2010), pp. 235–236; Werner Hechberger in: Journal for Bavarian State History 70 (2007), pp. 972–974.
  27. ^ Roman Deutinger: Royal rule in the East Franconian Empire. A pragmatic constitutional history of the late Carolingian era. Ostfildern 2006, p. 14.
  28. ^ Roman Deutinger: Royal rule in the East Franconian Empire. A pragmatic constitutional history of the late Carolingian era. Ostfildern 2006, p. 222.
  29. ^ Roman Deutinger: Royal rule in the East Franconian Empire. A pragmatic constitutional history of the late Carolingian era. Ostfildern 2006, p. 35.
  30. ^ Roman Deutinger: Royal rule in the East Franconian Empire. A pragmatic constitutional history of the late Carolingian era. Ostfildern 2006, pp. 225-272.
  31. ^ Roman Deutinger: Royal rule in the East Franconian Empire. A pragmatic constitutional history of the late Carolingian era. Ostfildern 2006, p. 390.
  32. ↑ See also the reviews of Romedio Schmitz-Esser in: Zeitschrift für bayerische Landesgeschichte 74 (2011), p. 925; Brigitte Kasten in: sehepunkte 11 (2011), No. 5 [15. May 2011], ( online ); Thomas N. Bisson in: German Historical Institute London Bulletin 33 (2011), pp. 104–112 ( online ); Roman Zehetmayer in: Mitteilungen des Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 119 (2011), pp. 418–420 ( online ); Volker Henn in: Rheinische Vierteljahrsblätter 75 (2011) pp. 326–329 ( online ); Bernd Fuhrmann in: Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 98 (2011) p. 497f .; Thomas Wittkamp, ​​in: H-Soz-u-Kult , August 1, 2012 ( online ); Carsten Fischer in: Journal of the Savigny Foundation for Legal History, German Department 129 (2012), pp. 580–585; Hiram Kümper in: Mediävistik 25 (2012) pp. 380–383; Christian Vogel in: Das Mittelalter 18 (2013) pp. 157–159; Bernhard Theil in: Journal for Württemberg State History 72 (2013), p. 559f; Thomas Wetzstein in: Historische Zeitschrift 299 (2014) pp. 199f.
  33. ↑ Susan Reynolds: Fiefs and vassals. The medieval evidence reinterpreted. Oxford 1994.
  34. ^ Roman Deutinger: Emperor and Pope: Friedrich I. and Hadrian IV. In: Jürgen Dendorfer, Roman Deutinger (ed.): The Lehnwesen im Hochmittelalter. Research constructs - source findings - relevance to interpretation. Ostfildern 2010, pp. 329–345, here: p. 329.
  35. ^ Roman Deutinger: Emperor and Pope: Friedrich I. and Hadrian IV. In: Jürgen Dendorfer, Roman Deutinger (ed.): The Lehnwesen im Hochmittelalter. Research constructs - source findings - relevance to interpretation. Ostfildern 2010, pp. 329–345, here: pp. 342ff.
  36. ^ Roman Deutinger: The high Middle Ages feudal system: results and perspectives. In: Jürgen Dendorfer, Roman Deutinger (ed.): The feudal system in the high Middle Ages. Research constructs - source findings - relevance to interpretation. Stuttgart 2010, pp. 463–473, here: p. 468.
  37. ^ Roman Deutinger: From office to fiefdom. The example of the German duchies in the High Middle Ages. In: Karl-Heinz Spieß (Ed.): Education and spread of feudalism in the empire and in Italy in the 12th and 13th centuries. Ostfildern 2013, pp. 133–157, here: p. 156 ( online )
  38. ^ Roman Deutinger: The oldest tithe terminations in the Middle Rhine. In: Archive for Middle Rhine Church History, Vol. 54 (2002), pp. 11–36 ( online ). See the discussion by Ernst-Dieter Hehl in: German Archive for Research into the Middle Ages, Vol. 59 (2003), p. 787 ( online )
  39. ^ Roman Deutinger: On the establishment of the Osterhofen Canonical Monastery. In: Passauer Jahrbuch. Contributions to the history and culture of Eastern Bavaria 47 (2005) pp. 69–83. See the discussion by Rudolf Schieffer in: German Archive for Research of the Middle Ages, Vol. 62 (2006), p. 817 ( online ). Deutinger approving: Stefan Petersen: Premonstratensian ways to Rome. The papal documents of the Franconian and Swabian monasteries until 1378. Cologne 2015, p. 240.
  40. ↑ See the review by Daniela Bianca Hoffmann in: sehepunkte 19 (2019), No. 4 [15. April 2019], ( online ).
  41. ^ Roman Deutinger: Abbots and convent of the Niederaltaich monastery in the Carolingian era. In: Studies and communications on the history of the Benedictine order and its branches 117 (2006), pp. 31–60.
  42. ^ Roman Deutinger: 'King's Election' and Duke Arnulf of Bavaria. The testimony of the older Salzburg annals for the year 920. In: German Archive for Research into the Middle Ages 58 (2002), pp. 17–68 ( digitized version ). See Steffen Patzold: How do you prepare for a change of the throne? Thoughts on a neglected 11th century text. In: Matthias Becher (Hrsg.): The medieval succession to the throne in European comparison. Ostfildern 2017, pp. 127–162, here: p. 129.
  43. ↑ Gerd Althoff: King Konrad I - King Konrad I in the Ottonian memoria? In: Hans-Werner Goetz (Ed.): Konrad I. On the way to the “German Reich”? Bochum 2006, pp. 317–328, here: p. 324.
  44. ↑ Roman Deutinger: King's election and Duke's raising of Arnulf of Bavaria. The testimony of the older Salzburg annals for the year 920. In: Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 58 (2002), pp. 17–68, here: p. 54 ( digitized version ).
  45. ↑ See the reviews by John M. Jeep in: Mediaevistik 30 (2017), pp. 371–373; Egon Johannes Greipl in: Journal for Bavarian State History. 81 (2018), pp. 834-835; Eric Knibbs in: German Archive for Research into the Middle Ages 75 (2019), pp. 678–679.
  46. ↑ Lex Baioariorum III, 1.
  47. ↑ Roman Deutinger: Who were the Agilolfingers? In: Steffen Patzold, Karl Ubl (Hrsg.): Kinship, name and social order (300–1000). Berlin et al. 2014, pp. 177–194, here: p. 180.
  48. ↑ Roman Deutinger: Who were the Agilolfingers? In: Steffen Patzold, Karl Ubl (Hrsg.): Kinship, name and social order (300–1000). Berlin et al. 2014, pp. 177–194, here: p. 187.
  49. ^ Roman Deutinger: A country and its right: The Lex Baioariorum in Bavaria and Austria. In: Christina Mochty-Weltin, Roman Zehetmayer (Ed.): Nobility and Constitution in the High and Late Medieval Empire. The lectures of the conference in memory of Maximilian Weltin (February 23 and 24, 2017). St. Pölten 2018, pp. 71–88.
  50. ↑ See the reviews by Peter Rückert in: Zeitschrift für Württembergische Landesgeschichte 77 (2018), pp. 447–449 ( online ); Melanie Burgemeister in: Bayerisches Jahrbuch für Volkskunde 2018, pp. 378–379; Gerhard Tausche in: Journal for Bavarian State History. 81 (2018), pp. 835-837; Claudia Feller in: Communications from the Institute for Austrian Historical Research. 127 (2019), pp. 222-224 ( online ).
  51. ^ Roman Deutinger: The beginnings of the city of Erding. In: Oberbayerisches Archiv 141 (2017), pp. 8–29. See the media reports Gabi Zierz: Research by archaeologists and historians. The founding of the city in 1228 is a myth. In: Münchner Merkur , December 4, 2016; Gerhard Wilhelm: Erdinger story. The myth of city foundation. Two historians independently come to the conclusion that Erding was settled before 1228. In: Süddeutsche Zeitung , December 4, 2016.
personal data
SURNAME Deutinger, Roman
BRIEF DESCRIPTION German historian
DATE OF BIRTH 1970
PLACE OF BIRTH Osterhofen