Chris Brand: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|image_size =
|image_size =
|caption =
|caption =
|birth_date = {{birth date and age|df=yes|1943|06|01}}
|birth_date = {{birth date|df=yes|1943|06|01}}
|birth_place = [[Preston, Lancashire|Preston]], United Kingdom
|birth_place = [[Preston, Lancashire|Preston]], United Kingdom
|death_date = {{death date and age|2017|5|28|1943|06|1|df=y}}<ref name=death />
|residence =
|residence =
|citizenship = British
|citizenship = British
|ethnicity = [[White British]]
|field = [[Psychometrics]]
|field = [[Psychometrics]]
|work_institution = formerly [[University of Edinburgh]]
|work_institution = formerly [[University of Edinburgh]]
Line 20: Line 20:
}}
}}


'''Christopher Richard Brand''' (born in [[Preston, Lancashire|Preston]], England, 1 June 1943) is a British [[psychology|psychological]] and [[psychometrics|psychometric]] researcher who gained media attention for his statements on [[race and intelligence]] and [[paedophilia]].<ref name="holden1997">Holden, Constance (22 August 1997). Controversial Academic Gets the Axe. ''Science'' 22 August 1997: 1045. {{doi|10.1126/science.277.5329.1045a}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title = Christopher Brand|url = http://www.psychreg.com/christopher-brand/|website = Psychreg|publisher = |accessdate = 7 September 2015}}</ref>
'''Christopher Richard Brand''' (1 June 1943 28 May 2017) was a British [[psychology|psychological]] and [[psychometrics|psychometric]] researcher who gained media attention for his controversial statements on [[race and intelligence]] and [[paedophilia]].<ref name="holden1997">{{cite journal | last1 = Holden | first1 = Constance | year = 1997 | title = Controversial Academic Gets the Axe | journal = Science | volume = 277| issue = 5329 | page = 1045 | doi = 10.1126/science.277.5329.1045a | s2cid = 151285074 }}</ref>


Brand is a proponent of [[IQ]] testing and the [[general intelligence factor]] and was "a major influence in the spread of influence of [[inspection time]] as a theoretically interesting correlate of psychometric intelligence," according to [[Ian Deary]] and Pauline Smith in ''the International Handbook of Intelligence'', edited by [[Robert Sternberg]].<ref>{{cite book
Brand was a proponent of [[IQ]] testing and the [[general intelligence factor]], and was "a major influence in the spread of influence of [[inspection time]] as a theoretically interesting correlate of psychometric intelligence," according to [[Ian Deary]] and Pauline Smith.<ref>{{cite book
|author1=Deary, I. |author2=Smith, P. |date=2 February 2004
|author1=Deary, I. |author2=Smith, P. |date=2 February 2004
| title = The International Handbook of Intelligence
| title = The International Handbook of Intelligence
| chapter = Intelligence Research and Assessment in the United Kingdom
| chapter = Intelligence Research and Assessment in the United Kingdom
| editor = Robert Sternberg
| editor = Robert Sternberg
| edition =
| pages = 14–15
| pages = 14–15
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
}}</ref>
| location =
| id =
| url =
}}</ref><ref name="beck1982">Beck, Joan (3 November 1982). Testing the Intelligence Quotient. ''[[The News and Courier]]''</ref> Deary and Smith report the correlation of inspection time with psychometric intelligence is currently considered to be .4.<ref>Deary and Smith 2004 p. 15.</ref> The 25th anniversary of the original discovery of this relationship was observed in 2001 by a special issue of ''[[Intelligence (journal)|Intelligence]]''.<ref>Deary and Smith 2004 p. 14. Original discovery was by Nettelbeck and Lally.</ref> Confirmation of Brand's claim of a specially high IT/IQ correlation in the low-IQ range was provided in Tucker-Drob, 2009, Developmental Psychology (psychometrics).


==Life and career==
==Life and career==


Brand went to [[Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School for Boys]], and is a graduate of [[The Queen's College, Oxford]], and a 1968–1970 Fellow of [[Nuffield College]], Oxford. He was a Lecturer at [[University of Edinburgh]], from 1970 to 1997, teaching in personality, psychopathology and philosophical problems and researching in factorial psychology. In the 1980s he served on the United Kingdom's [[Council for National Academic Awards]]. His 1996 book ''The g Factor'' garnered considerable media attention with its claim that inherited [[general intelligence]] was like psychological money. Brand wrote that general intelligence is an important factor in determining life outcomes for those with lower scores. He attributes socio-economic differences among people of African descent to differences in general intelligence.
Brand was born in Preston, England on 1 June 1943. He went to [[Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School for Boys]], and was a graduate of [[The Queen's College, Oxford]], and a 1968–1970 Fellow of [[Nuffield College]], Oxford. He was a Lecturer at [[University of Edinburgh]], from 1970 to 1997, teaching in personality, psychopathology and philosophical problems and researching in factorial psychology. In the 1980s he served on the United Kingdom's [[Council for National Academic Awards]]. His 1996 book ''The g Factor'' garnered considerable media attention with its claim that inherited [[general intelligence]] was like psychological money. Brand wrote that general intelligence is an important factor in determining life outcomes for those with lower scores. He attributed socio-economic differences among people of African descent to differences in general intelligence.


Brand is a Fellow of the [[Galton Institute]]. From 2000 to 2004, Brand was a research consultant to the [[Project Prevention|CRACK]] programme based in [[Baltimore, Maryland]], which pays drug-addicted mothers $200 to be sterilised.<ref name="newsrecord2003">Editorial staff (4 August 2003). The guise of caring. ''[[Greensboro News & Record]]''</ref> His recent thinking can be sampled via his reviews at [[Amazon Books]],[http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/AGDMFV3NSIUCZ] his articles in [[American Renaissance (magazine)|American Renaissance]] and [[The Occidental Quarterly]], his (co-authored) chapter 'Why ignore the g factor?'<ref name="brand1997">Brand CR, Constales D (1997). Why ignore the g factor? Historical considerations. In Nyborg, H. (ed.) The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur Jensen. Pergamon, ISBN 978-0-08-043793-4</ref> and his decade-long blog ("IQ & PC"). His review of Buchanan's ''Playing with Fire'' was published in the journal ''[[Intelligence (journal)|Intelligence]]'' and at http://bussorah.tripod.com/ulysses.html in 2011.<ref name="brand2011">Brand, Chris (2011). "Psychology's Ulysses wins through". ''Intelligence'', Volume 39, Issue 1, January–February 2011, pp. 74–75, {{doi|10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.006}}</ref>
Brand was a Fellow of the [[Galton Institute]]. From 2000 to 2004, Brand was a research consultant to the [[Project Prevention|CRACK]] program based in [[Baltimore, Maryland]], which pays drug-addicted mothers $200 to be sterilised.<ref name="newsrecord2003">Editorial staff (4 August 2003). The guise of caring. ''[[Greensboro News & Record]]''</ref> He wrote articles for ''[[American Renaissance (magazine)|American Renaissance]]'' and ''[[The Occidental Quarterly]]''. He also wrote a blog, IQ & PC. His review of Buchanan's ''Playing with Fire'' was published in the journal ''[[Intelligence (journal)|Intelligence]]'' in 2011.<ref name="brand2011">Brand, Chris (2011). "Psychology's Ulysses wins through". ''Intelligence'', Volume 39, Issue 1, January–February 2011, pp. 74–75, {{doi|10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.006}}</ref>


Brand had three children. He married his third wife in 2001. He died on 28 May 2017.<ref name=death>{{cite journal|volume=122|pages=206–207|date=1 Feb 2018|doi=10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.011|last1=Egan|first1=Vincent|title=Obituary of Chris Brand (1st June 1943–28th May, 2017)|journal=Personality and Individual Differences|last2=Brand|first2=Natalia|last3=Brand|first3=Tom}}</ref>
Brand has three children and has been married to his third wife since 2001.


==Published positions==
==Published positions==


===Race and IQ===
===Race and IQ===
Brand's discussions of [[race and intelligence]] attracted controversy because of his support for the hypothesis that average IQ differences between racial and ethnic groups are at least partly genetic in origin,<ref name="younge1996" /> a view that is now considered discredited by mainstream science.<ref name=":22">{{Cite news |last=Evans |first=Gavin |date=2 March 2018 |title=The unwelcome revival of 'race science' |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/02/the-unwelcome-revival-of-race-science |url-status=live |access-date=May 2, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190220023319/https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/02/the-unwelcome-revival-of-race-science |archive-date=February 20, 2019}}</ref><ref name="VoxConsensus2">{{cite web |last1=Turkheimer |first1=Eric |last2=Harden |first2=Kathryn Paige |last3=Nisbett |first3=Richard E. |date=June 15, 2017 |title=There's still no good reason to believe black-white IQ differences are due to genes |url=https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/6/15/15797120/race-black-white-iq-response-critics |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504055356/https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/6/15/15797120/race-black-white-iq-response-critics |archive-date=May 4, 2021 |access-date=29 April 2021 |website=Vox |publisher=Vox Media}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |date=25 May 2017 |title=Intelligence research should not be held back by its past |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.22021 |journal=Nature |volume=545 |issue=7655 |pages=385–386 |doi=10.1038/nature.2017.22021 |pmid=28541341 |quote=Historical measurements of skull volume and brain weight were done to advance claims of the racial superiority of white people. More recently, the (genuine but closing) gap between the average IQ scores of groups of black and white people in the United States has been falsely attributed to genetic differences between the races.}}</ref>
Brand's discussion of the [[race and intelligence|disparity between races]] in average cognitive ability test scores has caused controversy, especially because of his support for the [[hereditarian]] hypothesis of such differences. Brand refers to himself as a [[race realist]] and has been called a "scientific racist."<ref name="wynne-jones1996">Wynne-Jones, Ros (18 August 1996).

[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scientific-racist-must-not-be-gagged-say-opponents-1310195.html 'Scientific racist' must not be gagged, say opponents.] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref><ref name="younge1996">Younge, Gary (26 May 1996). Race scientists – the colour of intelligence. ''[[New Straits Times]]'' Reprinted as [http://www.mg.co.za/printformat/single/1996-10-18-the-scientists-who-are-proud-to-be-racists The scientists who are proud to be racists.] ''[[Mail & Guardian]]''</ref>
Brand referred to himself as a "[[race realist]]" and has been described as a "[[Scientific racism|scientific racist]]."<ref name="wynne-jones1996">Wynne-Jones, Ros (18 August 1996).
His views are those of the classical 'London School' of psychology—other prominent members are professors [[Richard Lynn]] and Phil Rushton.
[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scientific-racist-must-not-be-gagged-say-opponents-1310195.html 'Scientific racist' must not be gagged, say opponents.] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref><ref name="younge1996">Younge, Gary (26 May 1996). Race scientists – the colour of intelligence. ''[[New Straits Times]]'' Reprinted as [http://www.mg.co.za/printformat/single/1996-10-18-the-scientists-who-are-proud-to-be-racists The scientists who are proud to be racists.] ''[[Mail & Guardian]]''</ref>


===Race, IQ and women===
===Race, IQ and women===
Brand's most controversial views generated headlines in April 1996, when he was quoted in the ''Independent on Sunday'' recommending that "low-IQ girls" be "encouraged to have sex with higher-IQ boys" rather than with their more usual low-IQ companions (which would result in [[dysgenics|genetic deterioration]]). "There are plenty of intelligent African men for black girls to be having sex with,"<ref name="wynne-jones1996b">Wynne-Jones, Ros (14 April 1996). [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/stupid-blacks-book-row-1304717.html 'Stupid blacks' book row.] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref> he said, but added that blacks probably needed to allow [[polygamy]].<ref name="thes1997">Editorial staff (9 May 1997). [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=100913&sectioncode=26 The personal views of a 'scientific racist.'] ''[[Times Higher Education]]''</ref>
Brand's controversial views generated headlines in April 1996, when he was quoted in the ''Independent on Sunday'' recommending that "low-IQ girls" be "encouraged to have sex with higher-IQ boys" rather than with their more usual low-IQ companions (which would result in [[dysgenics|genetic deterioration]]). "There are plenty of intelligent African men for black girls to be having sex with,"<ref name="wynne-jones1996b">Wynne-Jones, Ros (14 April 1996). [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/stupid-blacks-book-row-1304717.html 'Stupid blacks' book row.] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref> he said, but added that blacks probably needed to allow [[polygamy]].<ref name="thes1997">Editorial staff (9 May 1997). [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=100913&sectioncode=26 The personal views of a 'scientific racist.'] ''[[Times Higher Education]]''</ref>


Brand has also written that "women are inclined to deceitful [[promiscuity]]" and that [[Sigmund Freud]] was therefore right to ascribe weaker [[super ego|super-egos]] to women than to men. His 1996 book ''[[The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications]]'' led to accusations of [[scientific racism]] and [[sexism]], and his university lectures were protested and closed by the [[Anti-Nazi League]] of [[Edinburgh]]. Brand's book was subsequently withdrawn by publisher [[John Wiley & Sons]].<ref name="">Eysenck, Hans (26 April 1996). [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=93434&sectioncode=26 The colour of Intelligence.] ''Times Higher Education''</ref> It was then published free on the web by Douance.<ref name="brand1996">Brand CR (1996). ''[http://www.douance.org/qi/brandbook.htm The G Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications (free online text).]'' originally John Wiley & Sons Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-96070-6</ref>
Brand also wrote that "women are inclined to deceitful [[promiscuity]]" and that [[Sigmund Freud]] was therefore right to ascribe weaker [[super ego|super-egos]] to women than to men. His 1996 book ''[[The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications]]'' led to accusations of [[scientific racism]] and [[sexism]], and his university lectures were protested and closed by the [[Anti-Nazi League]] of [[Edinburgh]]. Brand's book was subsequently withdrawn by publisher [[John Wiley & Sons]].<ref>Eysenck, Hans (26 April 1996). [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=93434&sectioncode=26 The colour of Intelligence.] ''Times Higher Education''</ref> It was then published free on the web by Douance.<ref name="brand1996">Brand CR (1996). ''[http://www.douance.org/qi/brandbook.htm The G Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications (free online text).]'' originally John Wiley & Sons Inc., {{ISBN|978-0-471-96070-6}}</ref>


===Paedophilia===
===Paedophilia===
In October 1996 Brand came to the defence of [[Nobel Prize|Nobel laureate]] [[Daniel Carleton Gajdusek]] who had been charged with [[child sex abuse]]. Brand argued that sex with a consenting partner over the age of 12 was not harmful so long as both partners had an above-average IQ.<ref>[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=106530&sectioncode=26 'Racist' Brand loses dismissal appeal], Olga Wojtas, ''Times Higher Education'', 27 March 1998, retrieved 22 December 2009</ref><ref name="the-fall-racist">[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=106773&sectioncode=26 Key factors in the fall of a 'scientific racist'], Olga Wotjas, ''Times Higher Education'', 10 April 1998, retrieved 22 December 2009</ref>
In October 1996 Brand came to the defence of [[Nobel Prize|Nobel laureate]] [[Daniel Carleton Gajdusek]] who had been charged with [[child sex abuse]]. Brand argued that sex with a consenting partner over the age of 12 was not harmful so long as both partners had an above-average IQ.<ref>[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=106530&sectioncode=26 'Racist' Brand loses dismissal appeal], Olga Wojtas, ''Times Higher Education'', 27 March 1998, retrieved 22 December 2009</ref><ref name="the-fall-racist">[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=106773&sectioncode=26 Key factors in the fall of a 'scientific racist'], Olga Wotjas, ''Times Higher Education'', 10 April 1998, retrieved 22 December 2009</ref>


The proceedings were initiated in 1996 after the dean of social sciences complained.<ref name="the-fall-racist"/> Edinburgh University's Chaplain, a supporter of the Anti-Nazi League, had taken Brand's e-mailed reflections on pederasty to the Scottish press. Edinburgh's Student newspaper's frontpage banner headline was FIRST IT WAS BLACKS, THEN IT WAS WOMEN, NOW IT'S KIDS.
The proceedings were initiated in 1996 after the dean of social sciences complained.<ref name="the-fall-racist"/> Edinburgh University's Chaplain, a supporter of the Anti-Nazi League, had taken Brand's e-mailed reflections on pederasty to the Scottish press. Edinburgh's Student newspaper's frontpage banner headline was "FIRST IT WAS BLACKS, THEN IT WAS WOMEN, NOW IT'S KIDS".


Brand was fired a year later after hearings from his 27-year tenured position at [[Edinburgh University]] in 1997.<ref name="ward1997">Ward, Lucy (9 August 1997). [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/lecturer-sacked-for-saying-child-sex-harmless-1244412.html Lecturer sacked for saying child sex "harmless."] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref><ref name="hinde1997">Hinde, Julia (15 August 1997). [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=103189&sectioncode=26 Branded an outcast.] ''Times Higher Education''</ref> The University said this was for conduct that "brought the university into disrepute."
Brand was fired a year later after hearings from his 27-year position at [[Edinburgh University]] in 1997.<ref name="ward1997">Ward, Lucy (9 August 1997). [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/lecturer-sacked-for-saying-child-sex-harmless-1244412.html Lecturer sacked for saying child sex "harmless."] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref><ref name="hinde1997">Hinde, Julia (15 August 1997). [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=103189&sectioncode=26 Branded an outcast.] ''Times Higher Education''</ref> The University said this was for conduct that "brought the university into disrepute".


Brand appealed and sued the University for unfair dismissal, and received £12,000 (in those days the maximum obtainable from an Employment Tribunal) in an out-of-court settlement.<ref name="rudbeck2002">Rudbeck, Clare (30 May 2002). [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/higher/free-to-speak-out-652763.html Free to speak out?] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref> His case became a [[cause célèbre]] among advocates of [[academic freedom]]. [[Marek Kohn]] cited the Brand incident in a defence of intellectual freedom on the Internet.<ref name="kohn1996">Kohn, Marek (19 May 1996). [http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/technofile-1348189.html Technofile.] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref> Others, however, including a former Brand student, considered academic freedom a privilege that carried with it an expectation of "social responsibility".<ref name="swain2008">Swain, Harriet (3 January 2008). [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=210052&sectioncode=26 Dealing with controversial colleagues.] ''Times Higher Education''</ref>
Brand appealed and sued the University for [[unfair dismissal]], and received £12,000 (in those days the maximum obtainable from an [[employment tribunal]]) in an out-of-court settlement.<ref name="rudbeck2002">Rudbeck, Clare (30 May 2002). [https://web.archive.org/web/20090623074420/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/higher/free-to-speak-out-652763.html Free to speak out?] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref> His case became a [[cause célèbre]] among advocates of [[academic freedom]]. [[Marek Kohn]] cited the Brand incident in a defence of intellectual freedom on the Internet.<ref name="kohn1996">Kohn, Marek (19 May 1996). [https://web.archive.org/web/20121110172813/http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/technofile-1348189.html Technofile.] ''[[The Independent]]''</ref> Others, however, including a former Brand student, considered academic freedom a privilege that carried with it an expectation of "social responsibility".<ref name="swain2008">Swain, Harriet (3 January 2008). [http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=210052&sectioncode=26 Dealing with controversial colleagues.] ''Times Higher Education''</ref>


Eric Barendt (University College London), in the chapter "The Chris Brand Case" in his 2010 book ''Academic Freedom'', said Brand should have tried harder to get on with his colleagues<ref>Eric Barendt, ''Academic Freedom and the Law: A Comparative Study'', Hart Publishing, 2010.</ref> – who Brand replied were "Jew-leftie-commie[s]".<ref>[http://gfactor.blogspot.com/2011_01_01_archive.html#346200036249465903 LEFTISTS LOVE THEIR CHAINS]</ref>
Eric Barendt (University College London), in the chapter "The Chris Brand Case" in his 2010 book ''Academic Freedom'', said Brand should have tried harder to get on with his colleagues<ref>Eric Barendt, ''Academic Freedom and the Law: A Comparative Study'', Hart Publishing, 2010.</ref> – who Brand replied were "Jew-leftie-commie[s]".<ref>[http://gfactor.blogspot.com/2011_01_01_archive.html#346200036249465903 LEFTISTS LOVE THEIR CHAINS]</ref>
Line 68: Line 65:
==Selected publications==
==Selected publications==
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
*Brand, C. R. (1972). "Relations between emotional and social behaviour: a questionnaire study of individual differences". ''[[British Journal of Clinical Psychology]]''. 1972 Feb;11(1):10–9. PMID 5024653
*{{cite journal | last1 = Brand | first1 = C. R. | date = Feb 1972 | title = Relations between emotional and social behaviour: a questionnaire study of individual differences | journal = [[British Journal of Clinical Psychology]] | volume = 11 | issue = 1| pages = 10–9 | pmid = 5024653 | doi = 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1972.tb00773.x }}
*Brand, C. R. (1981). New IQ test? ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]''. 1981 March 12;290(5802):82. PMID 7207601
*{{cite journal | last1 = Brand | first1 = C. R. | date = March 1981 | title = New IQ test? | journal = [[Nature (journal)|Nature]] | volume = 290 | issue = 5802| page = 82 | pmid = 7207601 | doi = 10.1038/290082a0 | bibcode = 1981Natur.290Q..82B | doi-access = free }}
*Brand, C. R., Deary I. J. (1982). "Intelligence and 'inspection time'". In Eysenck H. J. (ed.), ''A Model for Intelligence,'' pp.&nbsp;133–148. Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-11676-1
*Brand, C. R., Deary I. J. (1982). "Intelligence and 'inspection time'". In Eysenck H. J. (ed.), ''A Model for Intelligence,'' pp.&nbsp;133–148. Springer-Verlag, {{ISBN|978-0-387-11676-1}}
*Brand, C. R. (1984). "Personality dimensions: an overview of modern trait psychology". In ''Psychology Survey 5'', British Psychological Society. George Allen & Unwin, ISBN 978-0-901715-27-2
*Brand, C. R. (1984). "Personality dimensions: an overview of modern trait psychology". In ''Psychology Survey 5'', British Psychological Society. George Allen & Unwin, {{ISBN|978-0-901715-27-2}}
*Brand, C. R. (1989). The "big five" dimensions of personality? Evidence from ipsative, adjectival self-attributions. ''[[Personality and Individual Differences]]'', 10, 1165- 1171. {{doi|10.1016/0191-8869(89)90080-9}}
*{{cite journal | last1 = Brand | first1 = C. R. | year = 1989 | title = The "big five" dimensions of personality? Evidence from ipsative, adjectival self-attributions | journal = [[Personality and Individual Differences]] | volume = 10 | issue = 11 | pages = 1165–1171 | doi = 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90080-9 }}
*Brand, C. R., Freshwater S (1989). "Has there been a "massive" rise in IQ levels in the West? Evidence from Scottish children". ''[[Irish Journal of Psychology]]'', 10 (3), 388–393.
*{{cite journal | last1 = Brand | first1 = C. R. | last2 = Freshwater | first2 = S | year = 1989 | title = Has there been a "massive" rise in IQ levels in the West? Evidence from Scottish children" | journal = [[Irish Journal of Psychology]] | volume = 10 | issue = 3| pages = 388–393 | doi = 10.1080/03033910.1989.10557756 }}
*Brand, C. R., Caryl, P. G., Deary, I. J., Egan, V., Pagliari, H. C. (1991). "Is intelligence illusory?" ''[[The Lancet]]''. 1991 March 16;337(8742):678–9. PMID 1672021
*{{cite journal | last1 = Brand | first1 = C. R. | last2 = Caryl | first2 = P. G. | last3 = Deary | first3 = I. J. | last4 = Egan | first4 = V. | last5 = Pagliari | first5 = H. C. | date = March 1991 | title = Is intelligence illusory? | journal = [[The Lancet]] | volume = 337 | issue = 8742| pages = 678–9 | pmid = 1672021 | doi = 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92500-2 | s2cid = 40541346 }}
*Brand, C. R. (1992). Sizing-up the brain. ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]''. 1992 October 29;359(6398):768. PMID 1436046
*{{cite journal | last1 = Brand | first1 = C. R. | date = October 1992 | title = Sizing-up the brain | journal = [[Nature (journal)|Nature]] | volume = 359 | issue = 6398| page = 768 | pmid = 1436046 | doi = 10.1038/359768a0 | bibcode = 1992Natur.359..768B | doi-access = free }}
*Brand, C. R. (1994). "How many dimensions of personality? The 'Big 5', the 'Gigantic 3' or the 'Comprehensive 6'?" ''[[Psychologica Belgica]]'', 1994, vol. 34, no 4.
*Brand, C. R. (1994). "How many dimensions of personality? The 'Big 5', the 'Gigantic 3' or the 'Comprehensive 6'?" ''[[Psychologica Belgica]]'', 1994, vol. 34, no 4.
*Brand, C. R. (1994). Open to experience-closed to intelligence: Why the 'Big Five' are really the 'Comprehensive Six.' ''[[European Journal of Personality]]'' Volume 8, Issue 4, pp.&nbsp;299–310, November 1994 {{doi|10.1002/per.2410080407}}
*Brand, C. R. (1994). Open to experience-closed to intelligence: Why the 'Big Five' are really the 'Comprehensive Six.' ''[[European Journal of Personality]]'' Volume 8, Issue 4, pp.&nbsp;299–310, November 1994 {{doi|10.1002/per.2410080407}}
*Brand, C. R. (1994). Intelligence and Inspection Time: An Ontogenetic Relationship? ''The biology of human intelligence: proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium of the Eugenics Society London'', Nafferton Books, ISBN 978-0-905484-45-7
*Brand, C. R. (1994). Intelligence and Inspection Time: An Ontogenetic Relationship? ''The biology of human intelligence: proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium of the Eugenics Society London'', Nafferton Books, {{ISBN|978-0-905484-45-7}}
*Brand, C. R. (1996). The importance of intelligence in western societies. ''[[Journal of Biosocial Science]]'', 1996 Oct;28(4):387–404. PMID 8973000
*{{cite journal | last1 = Brand | first1 = C. R. | date = Oct 1996 | title = The importance of intelligence in western societies | journal = [[Journal of Biosocial Science]] | volume = 28 | issue = 4| pages = 387–404 | pmid = 8973000 | doi = 10.1017/s0021932000022495 | s2cid = 39696290 }}
*Brand, C. R. (1996). ''The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications''. John Wiley & Sons Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-96070-6
*Brand, C. R. (1996). ''The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications''. John Wiley & Sons Inc., {{ISBN|978-0-471-96070-6}}
*Brand, C. R. (1997). "Hans Eysenck's personality dimensions: Their number and nature". In H. Nyborg (ed.), ''The Scientific Study of Human Nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at eighty'', (pp.&nbsp;17–35). Pergamon, ISBN 978-0-08-042787-4
*Brand, C. R. (1997). "Hans Eysenck's personality dimensions: Their number and nature". In H. Nyborg (ed.), ''The Scientific Study of Human Nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at eighty'', (pp.&nbsp;17–35). Pergamon, {{ISBN|978-0-08-042787-4}}
*Brand, C. R., Constales, D. (1997). "Why ignore the g factor? Historical considerations". In Nyborg, H. (ed.), ''The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur Jensen.'' Pergamon, ISBN 978-0-08-043793-4
*Brand, C. R., Constales, D. (1997). "Why ignore the g factor? Historical considerations". In Nyborg, H. (ed.), ''The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur Jensen.'' Pergamon, {{ISBN|978-0-08-043793-4}}
*Kane, H. D., Oakland, T. D., Brand C. R. (2006). Differentiation at Higher Levels of Cognitive Ability: Evidence From the United States. ''[[The Journal of Genetic Psychology]]'' Volume 167, Number 3 / September 2006, pp.&nbsp;327 341.{{doi|10.3200/GNTP.167.3.327-341}} PMID 17278419
*{{cite journal | last1 = Kane | first1 = H. D. | last2 = Oakland | first2 = T. D. | last3 = Brand | first3 = C. R. | year = 2006 | title = Differentiation at Higher Levels of Cognitive Ability: Evidence From the United States | journal = [[The Journal of Genetic Psychology]] | volume = 167 | issue = 3| pages = 327–341 | doi = 10.3200/GNTP.167.3.327-341 | pmid = 17278419 | s2cid = 43192646 }}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


Line 91: Line 88:


== External links ==
== External links ==
*[http://www.psychreg.org/christopher-brand/ Christopher Brand on Psychreg]
*[http://gfactor.blogspot.com/ IQ & PC – By Chris Brand]: Personal website
*[http://gfactor.blogspot.com/ IQ & PC – By Chris Brand]: Personal website
*[http://www.douance.org/qi/brandbook.htm Download of ''The g Factor – General Intelligence and its Implications''] via douance.org
*[http://www.douance.org/qi/brandbook.htm Download of ''The g Factor – General Intelligence and its Implications''] via douance.org
*[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886917305032 Obituary] in ''[[Personality and Individual Differences]]''

{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Brand, Chris}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Brand, Chris}}
[[Category:1943 births]]
[[Category:1943 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:2017 deaths]]
[[Category:Academics of the University of Edinburgh]]
[[Category:Academics of the University of Edinburgh]]
[[Category:Alumni of The Queen's College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Alumni of the Queen's College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Fellows of Nuffield College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Fellows of Nuffield College, Oxford]]
[[Category:Differential psychologists]]
[[Category:Differential psychologists]]
Line 107: Line 103:
[[Category:Race and intelligence controversy]]
[[Category:Race and intelligence controversy]]
[[Category:People educated at Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School for Boys]]
[[Category:People educated at Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School for Boys]]
[[Category:People from Preston, Lancashire]]
[[Category:Scientists from Preston, Lancashire]]
[[Category:Psychometricians]]
[[Category:Psychometricians]]
[[Category:British psychologists]]
[[Category:British psychologists]]
[[Category:British eugenicists]]

Latest revision as of 08:14, 12 May 2024

Christopher Richard Brand
Born(1943-06-01)1 June 1943
Preston, United Kingdom
Died28 May 2017(2017-05-28) (aged 73)[1]
CitizenshipBritish
Alma materUniversity of Oxford
Known forInspection time as a correlate of intelligence,
The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications
Scientific career
FieldsPsychometrics
Institutionsformerly University of Edinburgh

Christopher Richard Brand (1 June 1943 – 28 May 2017) was a British psychological and psychometric researcher who gained media attention for his controversial statements on race and intelligence and paedophilia.[2]

Brand was a proponent of IQ testing and the general intelligence factor, and was "a major influence in the spread of influence of inspection time as a theoretically interesting correlate of psychometric intelligence," according to Ian Deary and Pauline Smith.[3]

Life and career[edit]

Brand was born in Preston, England on 1 June 1943. He went to Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School for Boys, and was a graduate of The Queen's College, Oxford, and a 1968–1970 Fellow of Nuffield College, Oxford. He was a Lecturer at University of Edinburgh, from 1970 to 1997, teaching in personality, psychopathology and philosophical problems and researching in factorial psychology. In the 1980s he served on the United Kingdom's Council for National Academic Awards. His 1996 book The g Factor garnered considerable media attention with its claim that inherited general intelligence was like psychological money. Brand wrote that general intelligence is an important factor in determining life outcomes for those with lower scores. He attributed socio-economic differences among people of African descent to differences in general intelligence.

Brand was a Fellow of the Galton Institute. From 2000 to 2004, Brand was a research consultant to the CRACK program based in Baltimore, Maryland, which pays drug-addicted mothers $200 to be sterilised.[4] He wrote articles for American Renaissance and The Occidental Quarterly. He also wrote a blog, IQ & PC. His review of Buchanan's Playing with Fire was published in the journal Intelligence in 2011.[5]

Brand had three children. He married his third wife in 2001. He died on 28 May 2017.[1]

Published positions[edit]

Race and IQ[edit]

Brand's discussions of race and intelligence attracted controversy because of his support for the hypothesis that average IQ differences between racial and ethnic groups are at least partly genetic in origin,[6] a view that is now considered discredited by mainstream science.[7][8][9]

Brand referred to himself as a "race realist" and has been described as a "scientific racist."[10][6]

Race, IQ and women[edit]

Brand's controversial views generated headlines in April 1996, when he was quoted in the Independent on Sunday recommending that "low-IQ girls" be "encouraged to have sex with higher-IQ boys" rather than with their more usual low-IQ companions (which would result in genetic deterioration). "There are plenty of intelligent African men for black girls to be having sex with,"[11] he said, but added that blacks probably needed to allow polygamy.[12]

Brand also wrote that "women are inclined to deceitful promiscuity" and that Sigmund Freud was therefore right to ascribe weaker super-egos to women than to men. His 1996 book The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications led to accusations of scientific racism and sexism, and his university lectures were protested and closed by the Anti-Nazi League of Edinburgh. Brand's book was subsequently withdrawn by publisher John Wiley & Sons.[13] It was then published free on the web by Douance.[14]

Paedophilia[edit]

In October 1996 Brand came to the defence of Nobel laureate Daniel Carleton Gajdusek who had been charged with child sex abuse. Brand argued that sex with a consenting partner over the age of 12 was not harmful so long as both partners had an above-average IQ.[15][16]

The proceedings were initiated in 1996 after the dean of social sciences complained.[16] Edinburgh University's Chaplain, a supporter of the Anti-Nazi League, had taken Brand's e-mailed reflections on pederasty to the Scottish press. Edinburgh's Student newspaper's frontpage banner headline was "FIRST IT WAS BLACKS, THEN IT WAS WOMEN, NOW IT'S KIDS".

Brand was fired a year later after hearings from his 27-year position at Edinburgh University in 1997.[17][18] The University said this was for conduct that "brought the university into disrepute".

Brand appealed and sued the University for unfair dismissal, and received £12,000 (in those days the maximum obtainable from an employment tribunal) in an out-of-court settlement.[19] His case became a cause célèbre among advocates of academic freedom. Marek Kohn cited the Brand incident in a defence of intellectual freedom on the Internet.[20] Others, however, including a former Brand student, considered academic freedom a privilege that carried with it an expectation of "social responsibility".[21]

Eric Barendt (University College London), in the chapter "The Chris Brand Case" in his 2010 book Academic Freedom, said Brand should have tried harder to get on with his colleagues[22] – who Brand replied were "Jew-leftie-commie[s]".[23]

Selected publications[edit]

  • Brand, C. R. (February 1972). "Relations between emotional and social behaviour: a questionnaire study of individual differences". British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 11 (1): 10–9. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1972.tb00773.x. PMID 5024653.
  • Brand, C. R. (March 1981). "New IQ test?". Nature. 290 (5802): 82. Bibcode:1981Natur.290Q..82B. doi:10.1038/290082a0. PMID 7207601.
  • Brand, C. R., Deary I. J. (1982). "Intelligence and 'inspection time'". In Eysenck H. J. (ed.), A Model for Intelligence, pp. 133–148. Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-11676-1
  • Brand, C. R. (1984). "Personality dimensions: an overview of modern trait psychology". In Psychology Survey 5, British Psychological Society. George Allen & Unwin, ISBN 978-0-901715-27-2
  • Brand, C. R. (1989). "The "big five" dimensions of personality? Evidence from ipsative, adjectival self-attributions". Personality and Individual Differences. 10 (11): 1165–1171. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90080-9.
  • Brand, C. R.; Freshwater, S (1989). "Has there been a "massive" rise in IQ levels in the West? Evidence from Scottish children"". Irish Journal of Psychology. 10 (3): 388–393. doi:10.1080/03033910.1989.10557756.
  • Brand, C. R.; Caryl, P. G.; Deary, I. J.; Egan, V.; Pagliari, H. C. (March 1991). "Is intelligence illusory?". The Lancet. 337 (8742): 678–9. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)92500-2. PMID 1672021. S2CID 40541346.
  • Brand, C. R. (October 1992). "Sizing-up the brain". Nature. 359 (6398): 768. Bibcode:1992Natur.359..768B. doi:10.1038/359768a0. PMID 1436046.
  • Brand, C. R. (1994). "How many dimensions of personality? The 'Big 5', the 'Gigantic 3' or the 'Comprehensive 6'?" Psychologica Belgica, 1994, vol. 34, no 4.
  • Brand, C. R. (1994). Open to experience-closed to intelligence: Why the 'Big Five' are really the 'Comprehensive Six.' European Journal of Personality Volume 8, Issue 4, pp. 299–310, November 1994 doi:10.1002/per.2410080407
  • Brand, C. R. (1994). Intelligence and Inspection Time: An Ontogenetic Relationship? The biology of human intelligence: proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium of the Eugenics Society London, Nafferton Books, ISBN 978-0-905484-45-7
  • Brand, C. R. (October 1996). "The importance of intelligence in western societies". Journal of Biosocial Science. 28 (4): 387–404. doi:10.1017/s0021932000022495. PMID 8973000. S2CID 39696290.
  • Brand, C. R. (1996). The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications. John Wiley & Sons Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-96070-6
  • Brand, C. R. (1997). "Hans Eysenck's personality dimensions: Their number and nature". In H. Nyborg (ed.), The Scientific Study of Human Nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at eighty, (pp. 17–35). Pergamon, ISBN 978-0-08-042787-4
  • Brand, C. R., Constales, D. (1997). "Why ignore the g factor? Historical considerations". In Nyborg, H. (ed.), The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur Jensen. Pergamon, ISBN 978-0-08-043793-4
  • Kane, H. D.; Oakland, T. D.; Brand, C. R. (2006). "Differentiation at Higher Levels of Cognitive Ability: Evidence From the United States". The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 167 (3): 327–341. doi:10.3200/GNTP.167.3.327-341. PMID 17278419. S2CID 43192646.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Egan, Vincent; Brand, Natalia; Brand, Tom (1 February 2018). "Obituary of Chris Brand (1st June 1943–28th May, 2017)". Personality and Individual Differences. 122: 206–207. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.011.
  2. ^ Holden, Constance (1997). "Controversial Academic Gets the Axe". Science. 277 (5329): 1045. doi:10.1126/science.277.5329.1045a. S2CID 151285074.
  3. ^ Deary, I.; Smith, P. (2 February 2004). "Intelligence Research and Assessment in the United Kingdom". In Robert Sternberg (ed.). The International Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14–15.
  4. ^ Editorial staff (4 August 2003). The guise of caring. Greensboro News & Record
  5. ^ Brand, Chris (2011). "Psychology's Ulysses wins through". Intelligence, Volume 39, Issue 1, January–February 2011, pp. 74–75, doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.006
  6. ^ a b Younge, Gary (26 May 1996). Race scientists – the colour of intelligence. New Straits Times Reprinted as The scientists who are proud to be racists. Mail & Guardian
  7. ^ Evans, Gavin (2 March 2018). "The unwelcome revival of 'race science'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 20 February 2019. Retrieved 2 May 2021.
  8. ^ Turkheimer, Eric; Harden, Kathryn Paige; Nisbett, Richard E. (15 June 2017). "There's still no good reason to believe black-white IQ differences are due to genes". Vox. Vox Media. Archived from the original on 4 May 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
  9. ^ "Intelligence research should not be held back by its past". Nature. 545 (7655): 385–386. 25 May 2017. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22021. PMID 28541341. Historical measurements of skull volume and brain weight were done to advance claims of the racial superiority of white people. More recently, the (genuine but closing) gap between the average IQ scores of groups of black and white people in the United States has been falsely attributed to genetic differences between the races.
  10. ^ Wynne-Jones, Ros (18 August 1996). 'Scientific racist' must not be gagged, say opponents. The Independent
  11. ^ Wynne-Jones, Ros (14 April 1996). 'Stupid blacks' book row. The Independent
  12. ^ Editorial staff (9 May 1997). The personal views of a 'scientific racist.' Times Higher Education
  13. ^ Eysenck, Hans (26 April 1996). The colour of Intelligence. Times Higher Education
  14. ^ Brand CR (1996). The G Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications (free online text). originally John Wiley & Sons Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-96070-6
  15. ^ 'Racist' Brand loses dismissal appeal, Olga Wojtas, Times Higher Education, 27 March 1998, retrieved 22 December 2009
  16. ^ a b Key factors in the fall of a 'scientific racist', Olga Wotjas, Times Higher Education, 10 April 1998, retrieved 22 December 2009
  17. ^ Ward, Lucy (9 August 1997). Lecturer sacked for saying child sex "harmless." The Independent
  18. ^ Hinde, Julia (15 August 1997). Branded an outcast. Times Higher Education
  19. ^ Rudbeck, Clare (30 May 2002). Free to speak out? The Independent
  20. ^ Kohn, Marek (19 May 1996). Technofile. The Independent
  21. ^ Swain, Harriet (3 January 2008). Dealing with controversial colleagues. Times Higher Education
  22. ^ Eric Barendt, Academic Freedom and the Law: A Comparative Study, Hart Publishing, 2010.
  23. ^ LEFTISTS LOVE THEIR CHAINS

External links[edit]