User talk:Dr. Blofeld

"Ahh welcome Meester Bond. I've been expecting you"

KING OF BALDNESS Blofeld's sexy jeans S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Archives
Aug 2006 Sept 2006 Oct 2006 Nov 2006 Dec 2006 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 Sept 2007 Oct 2007

"$ 1 million" or the "Alan Parsons Project" will indeed go into "phasing"

Warning. If you are visiting with tagging for images or have some criticism you are likely to hear an amplified response of the following coming out of one of the vents in the Japanese volcano. This organization does not tolerate bitching. Other than this His Baldness welcomes you with loving arms.

Preity Zinta

Sorry for the delay, but thanks for pointing it out to me. :) John Carter 22:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank youuuuuuuuuu for doing all your best it's just awesome thank you pal!!!!!!!!! I'm so happy! Thank you so so so much!!! Shahid • ^Talk2me 00:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I'll try to look it over more later--I have school in about 30 minutes. I'm not that familiar with WP:BLP, so I'll probably have to review that before I look at the article.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Heyyyyyyyy... I'm shocked!!!! Wow!! OK you removed award winning. mmm BOI, but her popularity is not based only on Box office India, and that's how it sounds now. She is in the top three actresses today, though I have no good source for it. Two additional reasons why not to add it. A) Box Office India is already mentioned in the lead twice... (repetitious) B) The lead summarizes the article, and the article really shows why she is popular precisely.

My best regards dear friend, Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

The box office provides only success, not popularity. All the list where she is placed on the top - they provide she is popular. The whole article provides it. Every controversy, every important public appearance, every media speculation, every hit. See Kareena Kapoor - all of her films from 2002 to date have been flops but yet she is very popular. Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Someone asks re image of KANK. Please don't let them remove it. Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

The image is not fair use, so we have to remove it? Oh man this image is so important. What did he ask there actually? Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes but it has its own license it doesn't necessarily need to be a fair use. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey I like what you've written there. Thanks, Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I'l look for good images. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh it reminded me of Kareena Kapoor. When Bollywood Dreamz added three FU images for Kareena under the same reason, User:Yamla removed them... ? Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Blof the recently added image is from Kal Ho Naa Ho not Koi Mil Gaya and it's not really notable. She won the Best Actress award for Kal Ho Naa Ho so what do you think about this image Image:KHNHLS.jpg?? Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I would like to change this image. The film is a tearjerker. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Nothing. Everything is OK. KHNH was an international hit and earned her many awards. But it was a tearjerker and this new image illustrates the matter in a better way. Isn't it? Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes I am but there must be a better image for Kya Kehna. I'm looking for. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

No it's not from KK. Here is a good link [1] There are couple of images here. The second one is from Kya Kehna (in Sari). The image with Bobby Deol from soldier, she is so HOT there, isn't she? So what do you say? Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes!!! I expanded the description. What do you say? Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

One user removed your request to review the article and wrote not so nice message on the FAC page. Please see that. I replied to him. Shahid • ^Talk2me 18:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeh don't take it seriously. I personally amazed with your keenness to keep people aware of this and fighting for its promotion. I'm really grateful. Thanks, Shahid • ^Talk2me 18:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes it is! That's great! Wish you all the best! Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

No there are no citation problems there. The user who's been working on it has done a very good work. We just need to improve it further in the writing aspect. It needs a major copyediting. I will dedicate myself to it after that. I adore her. In my opinion, Lata Mangeshkar and Bhosle are the best singers in the world for all intents and purposes. Best regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Congrats Blofeld on Zinta's article recently being promoted to an A-class status. All the best in taking it to a FA status. According to me it's already a FA. BTW I plan to read and support the article in taking it to a FA status tomorrow. Hope you don't mind!! I am currently busy with university and just came on Wikipedia for a while to revert some vandalisms. Best Regards --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 02:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

When I have os god friends in the area to help me, like you and Bollywood Dreamz, I don't even care for the article. You were so quick in making your edits, I just couldn't follow it. You may be exhausted!!! Thanks, Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Preity Zinta FA

Hi there Blofeld. I'll see what I can do—I've got two articles sort of lined up for reviewing, will see when I can get to them. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Preity Zinta and OK Connery

I left a message of support for Preity Zinta. I haven't been able to find any DVD on OK Connery, have you ? I think it should be watched first. Who's Croctotheface ? Seems to have stirred things up.

lol

Tovojolo 18:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

List of South Korean films

Hello, Herr Blofeld. I've been doing a little work on the surprisingly neglected area of Korean film lately, and I've come across a little problem, which is especially glaring on the List of South Korean films: There are two directors named Kim Ki-duk. The one we have an article on is a currently-active art-film director. The other one was a genre-film director in the 1960s & 1970s-- most notably of the 1967 giant-monster film Yongary. The Yongary link on the list goes to the art-film director, which is wrong... How do we solve a problem like this? Or maybe I should just stick to the Pink Films? Dekkappai 18:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Great! That solves the problem. Yes, I volunteer to work on that list. As a long-time fan of Korean film, I'm shocked that so many of Im Kwon-taek's films have no articles, so I'm starting by filling in some of that huge gap. There are also a lot of other Korean film articles on Wiki that are not on the list yet-- I'm putting them in during my spare time. In the meantime, Japanese erotic cinema is still in just the beginning stages... Tough work, but someone's got to do it! Dekkappai 19:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Greetings, Mr. Blofeld. I'll chip away at that list in my spare time. I have a suspicion, and so far it appears to be accurate, that the list of articles currently on Wiki is going to be disproportionately heavily tilted towards the 2000s. I'll put up articles on Im Kwon-taek's films of the '80s and '70s, and the few I know of the '60s... Once I get that done I'll look at other directors. But this will be a long-term project in-between work on those fascinating "Pink Films", of course. Dekkappai 20:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Preity Zinta FA nomination

Greetings, oh Blofeld of the Japanese volcano, and blessings on all your works.

How did you pick me for a request for comment on the Preity Zinta FA? I ask because I have only tried for FA on a total of one article, and I found the resulting experience to be frustrating, intimidaing, and depressing. I tried an FA on Itanium, The FAR had NO responses for about a month, followed by a series of pro forma responses about form rather than contents, with stupid and inconistent generalizations instead of useful suggestion. Based on this experience, I basically gave up, thinking that I would try again later, but I cannot summon any enthusiasm to restart the FA: I emotionally gave up on the FAR process and the entire FA concept. Your note about your FA prompts me to ask how you picked me? I will respond to your request for an FA review because I would have liked a bunch of reviews for my FAR, but I really need to know how to select a list of FAR reviewers for the next time I make the attempt. How did you pick me? -Arch dude 01:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Blof this O2 removed all your strikes from the FAC page. Shahid • ^Talk2me 03:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

We are in problems mate. I've been fighting these users on Zinta's FAC talk page for hours, and now a user strongly opposes, because as per her the controversy Krishnamurthy section needs a major copy-editing... Oh I'm so sad, Shahid • ^Talk2me 05:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

It's a sure thing Blof, the Other work and controversies sections must be copy-edited, and they're the main problem now. I'm afraid. Shahid • ^Talk2me 06:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Heyyyy thanks for copy-editing it. I don't know what the future of this article is, but I'm happy that you're here to help. I'm so grateful to you. Even if the article isn't promoted, your help is the best thing here. That's what mostly important to me, and that's why I'm happy nevertheless. For your help. Best regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Blof, not all of Zinta's controversies are related to her personal life. Especially the Bharat Shah case. Shahid • ^Talk2me 18:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The defamation case should be moved to the In the media section. What do you say? Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm always happy with your edits Blofeld. Wikipedia needs more editors like you, who can contribute so much in such a diverse range of subjects. I truly truly feel that you and Shahid have improved Zinta's article by leaps and bounds. All the best with Zinta's article and you can count on my support anytime. Wish you all the best in life!! --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 20:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

But there are actually negative quotes in the career section. See Khullam Khulla Pyar Karen, see Jhoom Barabar Jhoom. We have to limit, and she generally receives good reviews. What can we do? LOL I'll go through the refs and check the references. Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeh I know. It was a strong case. All kinds of fanatics beilieved that it was the end of the world. He is such a brilliant actor! God! That's amazing. Even at 65, he won the National Film Award for Best Actor. Everyone treats him like a God. Oh Zinta has worked with him in 5 films! He rocks! Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliments and support!! Regards --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 20:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Going through the article, I'm sure it's thousand times better than it was before, just brilliant. You've done a terrific job. The personal life is so well related and flaws in a brilliant way. Thank you and congrats, Shahid • ^Talk2me 21:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeh I've already started off my work on Rekha's page. I divided the career section to decades and will work on it. But I mostly want to improve the Asha Bhosle page. It is in exellent shape in my opinion, though now I see that it is a very hard task to promote an article to an FA. The image is really great! I like it. Thanks for uploading. Wow! Sandy has begun her work on Zinta now. Shahid • ^Talk2me 23:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't know what's the matter with this Tony! He looks an embittered guy! After you and sendy improved the article, he changed his Oppose to Strong oppose! And he is so rude! But I have actually addressed most of his comments and Sendy's too. Sendy had also left many hidden comments on the article whily editing it (she didn't want to load the FAC page with tons of suggestions, so she did that on the article), and I addressed all of them almost. I provided a reliable source instead of Youtube. I also removed the Filmfare magazine rankings completely cause we had no source for that, and I have no way to prove it actually. But I don't care for it. I just don't know what Tony's basic problem is. He is really embittered. LOL see that, he rudely wrote "Excuse me,,," and I added Done tag. LOL. Best regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 07:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Please leave me alone.

I don't want to have to pursue some sort of official dispute resolution here. Your opinion that my edits are "disruptive" is certainly novel. I'll edit what I want, so just leave me be. Croctotheface 19:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

PLEASE help me Blof where are you we are in serious troubled. Some stupid user gave a strong oppose saying that almost all the sources here are unreliable. He did that because he wikistalked me after we had a tiff on the Shahrukh Khan article. Look what he does here. Please help. Shahid • ^Talk2me 08:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

So finally, as I see this definitely won't be promoted. Shahid • ^Talk2me 08:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Please don't let them block me. Where are you? Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:JerryMaguirecruise.jpg

I have tagged Image:JerryMaguirecruise.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Ubiq Mail 10:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

RE:Greek cinema

I thought there might be a template for it knocking about somewhere! Cheers. Lugnuts 15:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Yep, the latter! I found it had half a dozen films on one page, with a couple from the 1910s/1920s. Thought I'd split them out and stumbled across the Greek one! Lugnuts 15:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

re

Thanks for your note on my talk page. I've replied on my talk page itself to keep the whole conversation in one place. See you there,xC | ☎ 18:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

re. there again.xC | ☎ 19:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

re. there again.xC | ☎ 20:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Just had a look at Abbas Kiarostami. Its a very good article, and I'm glad that despite the quibbling on the FAC page, it was promoted. The excess linking by copyeditors was just brilliant too... I get the feeling something similar is gonna happen on Zinta... but anyway...

Just had a request, if you could, please have a look at Discrete Bipolar Transistor Biasing ? I've written the whole thing, all the content, made all the images. I requested a peer review of it, but no-ones dropped by yet... perhaps you could add your comments to improve the article?

Again, technical isn't everyones field. But I just thought I'd ask. Thanks,xC | ☎ 20:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

No kidding! I have a friend studying in Cardiff Uni right now.. taken psychology but leaning towards automobile engg...

Anyway, keep up the great work! :) Happy editing,xC | ☎ 21:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Not a clue. Is it even possible to find out?!xC | ☎ 22:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

WHOA! I just had a look... Man, that is just insane!!xC | ☎ 22:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

WP? Published?? Not happening anytime soon...

Me - Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

You?xC | ☎ 22:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

yeah it is a bit late... its around 4.30 in the morning here... lol...

well, i've grown up with bollywood around me, so yeah, i do know a good bit... enough to add something worth knowing to WP... a lot of my edits are bollywood-centric actually...

its something we'll all come to... american and british films dominate because of the westernization of everything... bollywood will follow, no doubt... you can't keep art on this scale suppressed too long...

ive been over the FAC and tried to address a few more concerns.. if you can, do try to have a look... if you're still ticked over what happened.. well, hey, shit happens .. :P

anyway, im exhausted here.. so im going to catch some sleep... happy editing,xC | ☎ 23:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

List of tall men

Hi Sir Blofeld. I recognized that you were removing 6'4" from the tall men list. Well, if you wanna hear my opinion. It would be a better idea if the list of tall men would start with 6'3" because the physical examinations say, that tallness begins with 1,90 m. But I'm 6'6" myself and I think, that 6'3" is still the average height. 6'4" is hasitating between average and tall. D@rk K 20:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi again! Thanks for your convinced answers and thanks for thinking that I'm tall enough. I wish I could be 6'7" but I'm already turning to 19 years old. Greetings and best wishes! D@rk K 21:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, my desire is to become as tall as the actor David Prowse, who played Darth Vader in Star Wars. On my userpage, you can see that I'm a Star Wars-fan. And yes, I also adore the NBA. D@rk K 01:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Sukanto Tanoto and PT Inti Indorayon Utama

Hi there: Your new article PT Inti Indorayon Utama is an exact copy, including the chart, of part of the text in the article Sukanto Tanoto. Perhaps the name "PT Inti Indorayon Utama" just needs a re-direct to the Sukanto Tanoto page. I don't know how to do this. If nothing happens in the next day or so, I'll ask an admin. You can get an author's Speedy Delete for an article made by mistake. I can't tag it a copy vio, as the only match I have found is another Wiki page. It is interesting that the language of the text that is duplicated is so much more sophisticated than that of the rest of the Tanoto page. Truly remarkable, that! :-) Bielle 02:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

YES!!! Thank you so much. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I've been watching new articles about Indonesian movies and actors. Good work. — Indon (reply) — 13:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I remeber you have been blocked one because of a misunderstanding. You told me, "I guess it is one of the most days I've known here". So you may understand how I felt. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Good luck to you. Of course I've seen Bruce Lee's films and many films of Jackie Chan, love these films!!! They're great! Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Did you know that in the beginning of his career Akshay Kumar was called "The Indian Bruce Lee"? Really! He's done some very enjoyable action films. If you really like action films, I suggest you to watch Khiladiyon Ka Khiladi, a great action thriller (and don't forget the controversial song... Shower with Rekha!!! LOL :)) You know who is Denny's most frequent co-star? Undoubtedly Mithun Chakraborty. Mithun has acted in so many action films, and to surprise I'll say that have watched all of them. I have generally seen all the films of the superstars, from Amitabh Bachchan (Oh his page:-( ) to Shahrukh Khan... Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Mmmm I don't know if you will like Sarkar. It was critically acclaimed, but mm I don't know if suggest you that or not. See Salaam Namaste - very modern, cool, shot in Australia, successful etc. Have you seen songs of it on you tube? "My Dil Goes Mmmm", "Salaam Namaste" are my favorite. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:53, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your response, Sir Blofeld, though I am somewhat confused still. First, if it were up to me (and it is not) I would keep people whose principal claim to faim is with a company in the same article with the company, and the title of the article would be the name that is more recognizable. I doubt, however, if anyone on Wiki would agree with me, so the split you propose is likely fine as long as the repeated text then gets move out of the Tatonto article. Something is still not right about the vastly different qualitiy of the opening parts of the text from the rest. Second, I thought I was talking to Blofeld of SPECTRE who now seems to be User:The King of Baldness:The King of Baldness (or perhaps not) and even possibly Shshshsh who responded first above to my comment, but as User:Shahid:Shahid who also doesn't seem to exist. What a lot of personas for one query! Are you in the process of changing your name(s)? I have, for simplicity's sake, changed your signature on my discussion page to the less overwhelming standard form. This is no comment on the artwork, but on my eyes. Thanks again. Bielle 17:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh that's great if you like it. I didn't imagine. Enjoy your film. Regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:29, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Killifer.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Killifer.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Just to point out that 60.54.117.174 has vandalised your User page and I reverted it if this was a mistake then I apologise. Harland1 14:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Screech1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Screech1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)