Chinese cruiser Yangwei: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Battle of Yalu River: Removed duplicate dish
Added further source and trimmed uncited information
Line 62: Line 62:


==Design==
==Design==
The design for ''Yangwei'' was advertised by its designer British naval architect Sir [[George Wightwick Rendel]] as an example of a low-cost [[cruiser]] able to withstand larger [[Ironclad warship]]s. The design was later seen as an intermediate concept between his [[Flat-iron gunboat]]s and the [[protected cruiser]].{{sfn |Chesneau|Kolesnik| 1979| p=233}} In theory, the ship would rely on its small size and higher speed, along with a higher muzzle velocity [[main battery]] to attack larger,{{sfn |Friedman| 2012| p=150}}<ref>{{cite news|title=Hostilities in China|url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7841484//|accessdate=13 December 2016|work=[[Sydney Morning Herald]]|date=12 January 1885|page=5|via=[[Newspapers.com]]}}{{openaccess}}</ref> more cumbersome foes – very similar to the principles of [[Jeune Ecole]], as promoted by French naval architect [[Émile Bertin]]. However, the [[British Admiralty]] was very skeptical of the idea, and had concerns over the seaworthiness of the design in the [[North Sea]], and did not order any of the design for the [[Royal Navy]]. The idea was instead promoted to overseas clients instead.
The design for ''Yangwei'' was advertised by its designer British naval architect Sir [[George Wightwick Rendel]] as an example of a low-cost [[cruiser]] able to withstand larger [[Ironclad warship]]s. The design was later seen as an intermediate concept between his [[Flat-iron gunboat]]s and the [[protected cruiser]].{{sfn |Chesneau|Kolesnik| 1979| p=233}} In theory, the ship would rely on its small size and higher speed, along with a higher muzzle velocity [[main battery]] to attack larger,{{sfn |Friedman| 2012| p=150}}<ref>{{cite news|title=Hostilities in China|url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/7841484//|accessdate=13 December 2016|work=[[Sydney Morning Herald]]|date=12 January 1885|page=5|via=[[Newspapers.com]]}}{{openaccess}}</ref> more cumbersome foes – very similar to the principles of [[Jeune Ecole]].{{sfn |van de Ven| 2014| p=110}}


Although preceded in construction by the [[Chilean Navy]] vessel {{ship|Chilean cruiser|Arturo Prat|1880|2}}, the exactly design of the Chilean ship was not replicated. Several changes were made, including increasing the number of [[steam boiler]]s from four to six. Both ''Yangwei'' and her [[sister ship]], the {{ship|Chinese cruiser|Chaoyong||2}} shared the same design, and were built by [[Charles Mitchell (shipbuilder)|Charles Mitchell]] on the [[River Tyne]] near [[Newcastle Upon Tyne]]. The measured {{Convert|220|ft|m}} [[length overall|long overall]], with a [[beam (nautical)|beam]] of {{convert|32|ft|m}} and an average [[draft (hull)|draft]] of {{convert|15.5|ft|m}}. The ships were manned by 140 crew.{{sfn |Wright| 2000| p=47}} The most significant difference between the two ships was the power output of their [[reciprocating engine]]s; while ''Yangwei'' had an output of {{convert|2580|ihp|abbr=off|lk=in}}, ''Chaoyong''{{'s}} engine supplied {{convert|2677|ihp|abbr=on|lk=n}}. This meant that while ''Yangwei'' could achieve a speed of {{convert|16|kn|lk=in}}, the ''Chaoyong'' could go faster at {{convert|16.8|kn|lk=n}}.{{sfn |Wright| 2000| p=48}}
Although preceded in construction by the [[Chilean Navy]] vessel {{ship|Chilean cruiser|Arturo Prat|1880|2}}, the exactly design of the Chilean ship was not replicated. Several changes were made, including increasing the number of [[steam boiler]]s from four to six. Both ''Yangwei'' and her [[sister ship]], the {{ship|Chinese cruiser|Chaoyong||2}} shared the same design, and were built by [[Charles Mitchell (shipbuilder)|Charles Mitchell]] on the [[River Tyne]] near [[Newcastle Upon Tyne]]. The measured {{Convert|220|ft|m}} [[length overall|long overall]], with a [[beam (nautical)|beam]] of {{convert|32|ft|m}} and an average [[draft (hull)|draft]] of {{convert|15.5|ft|m}}. The ships were manned by 140 crew.{{sfn |Wright| 2000| p=47}} The most significant difference between the two ships was the power output of their [[reciprocating engine]]s; while ''Yangwei'' had an output of {{convert|2580|ihp|abbr=off|lk=in}}, ''Chaoyong''{{'s}} engine supplied {{convert|2677|ihp|abbr=on|lk=n}}. This meant that while ''Yangwei'' could achieve a speed of {{convert|16|kn|lk=in}}, the ''Chaoyong'' could go faster at {{convert|16.8|kn|lk=n}}.{{sfn |Wright| 2000| p=48}}
Line 91: Line 91:
* {{cite book|last=Friedman|first=Norman|title=British Cruisers of the Victorian Era|year=2012|publisher=Naval Institute Press|location=Annapolis, Maryland|isbn=978-1-59114-068-9|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Friedman|first=Norman|title=British Cruisers of the Victorian Era|year=2012|publisher=Naval Institute Press|location=Annapolis, Maryland|isbn=978-1-59114-068-9|ref=harv}}
*{{cite journal|last1=Jacques|first1=William H.|title=Torpedo Boats in Modern Warfare|journal=Cassier's Magazine|year=1898|volume=14|url=https://archive.org/details/cassiersmaga141898newy|publisher=Cassier Magazine Company|location=London|ref=harv}}
*{{cite journal|last1=Jacques|first1=William H.|title=Torpedo Boats in Modern Warfare|journal=Cassier's Magazine|year=1898|volume=14|url=https://archive.org/details/cassiersmaga141898newy|publisher=Cassier Magazine Company|location=London|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=van de Ven|first=Hans|title=Breaking with the Past: The Maritime Customs Service and the Global Origins of Modernity in China|year=2014|publisher=Columbia University Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-23151-052-3|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Wright|first=Richard N.J.|title=The Chinese Steam Navy|year=2000|publisher=Chatham Publishing|location=London|isbn=978-1-86176-144-6|ref=harv}}
* {{cite book|last=Wright|first=Richard N.J.|title=The Chinese Steam Navy|year=2000|publisher=Chatham Publishing|location=London|isbn=978-1-86176-144-6|ref=harv}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}

Revision as of 20:54, 13 December 2016

Yangwei under construction in Newcastle Upon Tyne
History
China
NameYangwei
Ordered1879
BuilderCharles Mitchell & Company, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Laid down15 January 1880
Launched29 January 1881
Completed15 July 1881
Commissioned22 November 1881
FateSank 18 September 1894
General characteristics
Class and typeTemplate:Sclass-
Displacement1,350 long tons (1,370 t)
Length220 ft (67 m)
Beam32 ft (9.8 m)
Draught15.5 ft (4.7 m)
Installed power2,580 indicated horsepower (1,920 kilowatts)
Propulsion
Speed16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph)
Boats & landing
craft carried
2 x Pinnaces
Complement140
Armament

Yangwei (Chinese: 揚威; pinyin: Yangwei; Wade–Giles: Yang-wei; lit. 'Projection of Power and Mightiness') was a cruiser built for the Imperial Chinese Navy. She was built by Charles Mitchell & Company in Newcastle Upon Tyne, England, from a design by Sir George Wightwick Rendel which had already been used on the Chilean Navy vessel Arturo Prat (later the Imperial Japanese Navy's Tsukushi). Two ships were ordered by the Chinese, the Yangwei and the Chaoyong. Both would serve together throughout their careers, assigned to the Beiyang Fleet and based in Taku during the summer, and Chemulpo, Korea, in the winter.

Yangwei did not see any action during the Sino-French War, but in the First Sino-Japanese War, she was in the Chinese line at the Battle of Yalu River on 17 September 1894. She was set alight by combined fire from the Japanese fleet, and drifted south out of the battle until running aground on a reef. She was subsequently destroyed by a spar torpedo from a boat of the Japanese cruiser Chiyoda.

Design

The design for Yangwei was advertised by its designer British naval architect Sir George Wightwick Rendel as an example of a low-cost cruiser able to withstand larger Ironclad warships. The design was later seen as an intermediate concept between his Flat-iron gunboats and the protected cruiser.[1] In theory, the ship would rely on its small size and higher speed, along with a higher muzzle velocity main battery to attack larger,[2][3] more cumbersome foes – very similar to the principles of Jeune Ecole.[4]

Although preceded in construction by the Chilean Navy vessel Arturo Prat, the exactly design of the Chilean ship was not replicated. Several changes were made, including increasing the number of steam boilers from four to six. Both Yangwei and her sister ship, the Chaoyong shared the same design, and were built by Charles Mitchell on the River Tyne near Newcastle Upon Tyne. The measured 220 feet (67 m) long overall, with a beam of 32 feet (9.8 m) and an average draft of 15.5 feet (4.7 m). The ships were manned by 140 crew.[5] The most significant difference between the two ships was the power output of their reciprocating engines; while Yangwei had an output of 2,580 indicated horsepower (1,920 kilowatts), Chaoyong's engine supplied 2,677 ihp (1,996 kW)*. This meant that while Yangwei could achieve a speed of 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph), the Chaoyong could go faster at 16.8 knots (31.1 km/h; 19.3 mph)*.[6]

They both were constructed out of 0.75 inches (1.9 cm) steel with waterproof bulkhead 3.5 feet (1.1 m) below the waterline, a single smokestack, and twin masts, which could also be used for sails. The prow was reinforced for ramming. They had a number of technical innovations, including hydraulic steering systems and electrical incandescent light fixtures. The main armaments were breech-loading 10-inch Armstrong Whitworth cannons, one on the bow and one on the stern, mounted in stationary gun shields. These shields were added for weather proofing reasons, but restricting the angle of fire that could be taken, as well as the elevation they could fire at. Yangweu also had four 5.1-inch guns, (two to each side), two 57 millimetres (2.2 in) long guns, four 11 millimetres (0.43 in) Gatling guns, four 37 millimetres (1.5 in) Hotchkiss guns, two 4-barrelled Nordenfeldt guns, as well as two torpedo tubes.[7] Both ships were equipped with two pinnaces, which were each armed with spar torpedoes.[8]

Career

Chinese diplomat Li Hongzhang was made aware of Rendel's designs, and following the start of the construction on Arturo Prat, an order was placed on behalf of the Imperial Chinese Navy for two ships of the same type. Both Yangwei and Chaoyong were laid down on 15 January 1880, with Chaoyong launched on 4 November and Yangwei following on 29 January 1881. Yangwei was subsequently worked up, and was announced as completed on 14 July that year. They were completed ahead of Arturo Prat,[5] who instead would enter service as the Imperial Japanese Navy's Tsukushi after Chile cancelled the order following the end of the War of the Pacific.[1]

The main deck of the Yangwei

Each of the Chinese vessels were equipped with Chinese crews, with Western captains and instructors in place. They sailed out of the Tyne River on 9 August, and stopped in Plymouth Sound two days later where Admiral Ding Ruchang joined them to take command of the ships for the journey to China.[5] Upon arrival in October, they toured Hong Kong, Canton and Shanghai, before travelling to the Taku Forts. Chaoyong was boarded by Hongzhang, and the two cruisers took the diplomat to inspect the dredging of the port at Taku (now the Port of Tianjin). Both ships were assigned to the Beiyang Fleet in the north, and Ruchang was placed in command.[6]

On 23 June 1884, Yantai was present alongside Chaoyong, as well as the corvette Yangwu and the sloop Kangji, when the Chinese vessels met their French Navy counterparts. The French ships dwarfed their Chinese counterparts, and following a discussion between the leaders of each fleet, the French put on a firing demonstration. Afterwards, the Chinese fleet broke up with Yang-Wu headed to Foochow (now Fuzhou), and the two Chaoyong cruisers sailed back to Taku.[9] The Sino-French War broke out shortly afterwards,[10] although Yangwei saw no action,[9] although there was speculation that the two cruisers might be sent to break the French blockade of Formosa.[11] She and Chaoyong were sent south to Shanghai in November, but were then brought back north after concerns were raised about growing Japanese influences in Korea.[12]

Battle of Yalu River

Following the war, Chaoyong and Yangwei continued to operate together. They operated out of Taku, but since the water froze over during winter, they would spend that part of the year in the Korean port of Chemulpo (now Incheon).[13] During the First Sino-Japanese War in 1894, Yangwei remained with the fleet and was supporting troop transports when they made contact with a Japanese fleet on the morning of 17 September.[14]

One of the Armstrong Whitworth 254 mm (10.0 in) cannons on the Yangwei

As the Japanese fleet moved in, the Chinese fleet moved away from anchor and attempted for form up in a line. However, the manoeuvre was botched and Yangwei was one of four ships which ended up behind the others.[14] This was due to a lack of maintenance over the years; with their equipment out of date they could barely make 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph)*. Orders had been given for the ships to operate in pairs, with Yangwei and Chaoyong teamed together. This battle plan was alien to the premise of their design, inherent in the lack of armour for ships about to fight in the line of battle.[15]

At a distance of 3,000 yards (2,700 m)*, the Japanese fleet targeted the Chaoyong and Yangwei. Within a few minutes, fires broke out on both ships, which quickly engulfed the central superstructures with its numerous wooden partitions covered with thick layers of flammable varnish applied over the years. Yangwei fought no more, and eventually beached on a reef several miles south with the loss of the majority of her crew.[15][16] The morning following the battle, she was destroyed by a spar torpedo from a boat of the Japanese cruiser Chiyoda.[15][17] The Japanese fleet had kept their distance, only sending in their smaller boats to investigate, fearing a counter attack by the Chinese using torpedoes.[17]

Notes

  1. ^ a b Chesneau & Kolesnik 1979, p. 233.
  2. ^ Friedman 2012, p. 150.
  3. ^ "Hostilities in China". Sydney Morning Herald. 12 January 1885. p. 5. Retrieved 13 December 2016 – via Newspapers.com.Open access icon
  4. ^ van de Ven 2014, p. 110.
  5. ^ a b c Wright 2000, p. 47.
  6. ^ a b Wright 2000, p. 48.
  7. ^ Wright 2000, p. 49.
  8. ^ Wright 2000, p. 181.
  9. ^ a b Wright 2000, pp. 60–61.
  10. ^ Wright 2000, pp. 62–63.
  11. ^ "The Chinese Navy". The Examiner. 31 January 1885. p. 1. Retrieved 11 December 2016 – via Trove.
  12. ^ Wright 2000, p. 64.
  13. ^ Wright 2000, p. 81.
  14. ^ a b Wright 2000, p. 90.
  15. ^ a b c Wright 2000, p. 91.
  16. ^ "The Fight off the Yaloo River". Sydney Morning Herald. 26 October 1894. p. 5. Retrieved 11 December 2016 – via Trove.
  17. ^ a b Jacques 1898, p. 479.

References

  • Chesneau, Roger; Kolesnik, Eugene M., eds. (1979). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. Greenwich, UK: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-8317-0302-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  • Friedman, Norman (2012). British Cruisers of the Victorian Era. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-068-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Jacques, William H. (1898). "Torpedo Boats in Modern Warfare". Cassier's Magazine. 14. London: Cassier Magazine Company. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • van de Ven, Hans (2014). Breaking with the Past: The Maritime Customs Service and the Global Origins of Modernity in China. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-23151-052-3. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Wright, Richard N.J. (2000). The Chinese Steam Navy. London: Chatham Publishing. ISBN 978-1-86176-144-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)