Jump to content

Smith v. Allwright

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Parkwells (talk | contribs) at 18:08, 22 March 2008 (→‎Background: note history of Democratic Party in the South). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Smith v. Allwright
Reargued January 12, 1944
Decided April 3, 1944
Full case nameSmith v. Allwright, Election Judge, et al.
Citations321 U.S. 649 (more)
Holding
Primary elections must be open to voters of all races.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Harlan F. Stone
Associate Justices
Owen Roberts · Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Frank Murphy
Robert H. Jackson · Wiley B. Rutledge
Case opinions
MajorityReed, joined by Stone, Black, Douglas, Murphy, Jackson, Rutledge
ConcurrenceFrankfurter (in the judgement of the court only)
DissentRoberts

Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944), was an important decision of the United States Supreme Court with regard to voting rights and, by extension, racial desegregation.

Background

Lonnie E. Smith, a black voter in Harris County, Texas, sued for the right to vote in a primary election being conducted by the Democratic Party. The law he challenged allowed the party to enforce a rule requiring all voters in its primary to be white. Because the Democratic Party had controlled politics in the South since the late 19th century, most Southern elections were decided by the outcome of the Democratic primary. Representing the NAACP, Thurgood Marshall argued this case in favor of Lonnie E. Smith.

Issue

Texas claimed that the Democratic Party was a private organization, while Smith said that the law in question essentially disenfranchised him by denying him the ability to vote in what was the only meaningful election in his jurisdiction.

The Decision

The Court agreed that the restricted primary denied Smith his protection under the law and found in his favor.

The Aftermath

Some observers believed the Court's ruling in this case helped prepare for its later ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), in terms of looking at the effect of a practice or law.

Many Southern politicians of the era who were later regarded as progressive nonetheless were staunch supporters of the "white primary" at the time of the challenges. Notable were J. William Fulbright and Claude Pepper, who despite their support for the white primary, supported anti-segregation candidates such as Henry A. Wallace in national elections.

External links

Works related to Smith v. Allwright at Wikisource