Jump to content

User talk:72.10.125.195

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SpiderJon (talk | contribs) at 12:18, 6 October 2008 (Caution: Vandalism on Lamp (electrical component). (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.


Please contribute constructively

If this is an shared IP address, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.

December 2005

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you! Dan100 (Talk) 13:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Femto 18:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

January 2006

  1. This message is regarding the page Declaration of Independence (United States). Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. pgk(talk) 18:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2006

  1. You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

    We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create an account. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.
    -- Alf melmac 17:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

-- Arwel (talk) 17:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Obli (Talk) 17:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2006

  1. Nerd: Please do not add obscenities to Wikipedia, like you did in Nerd. Injecting unnecessary swear words, racially or sexually abusive comments, or provocative pictures to articles or user pages offends many people. Wikipedia treats such actions as vandalism and blocks people from editing for such repeated vandalism. --Kbh3rdtalk 17:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cotton gin. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- No Guru 17:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

— Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 17:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Pollinator. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Chodorkovskiy (talk) 15:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Your recent edit to Industrial Revolution was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Industrial Revolution, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Waggers 14:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2006

  1. Your recent edit to Roller coaster was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to PH. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mangojuicetalk 12:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Giorgio Napolitano, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 15:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oldelpaso 17:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. skorpion 12:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Fathom, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
  6. This is your last warning for editing Sarah. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // Tawkerbot2 12:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

  1. Thank you for experimenting with the page First Crusade on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. --Pak21 15:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Your recent edit to Battle of Chancellorsville was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Your recent edit to Battle of Gettysburg was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:28, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Your recent edit to Chamillionaire was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kukini 15:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


September 2006

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 hour. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

--Bhadani 15:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 2006

  1. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia, as you did with Thomas More. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Francis Tyers · 15:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2006

  1. Thank you for experimenting with the page Roller skating on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 20:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Your recent edit to Mike Mead (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Allen Iverson, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 16:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2006

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Mammoth Cave National Park, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nationalparks 15:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Rosie O'Donnell, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 17:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. Gwernol 17:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]



January 2007

  1. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ozone layer. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Prolog 17:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Pornography, you will be blocked from editing. →AzaToth 17:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. theProject 17:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

  1. Thank you for experimenting with the page Roe v. Wade on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Pan Dan 13:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Your recent edit to Guitarist (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Next time you will be reported to an administrator, and blocked. Chickyfuzz14 17:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Nice. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 11:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gandalf, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 11:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gorilla, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 12:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Robot, you will be blocked from editing. Leafyplant 16:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Your recent edit to Nickelodeon (TV channel) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nickelodeon, you will be blocked from editing.
  10. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Utopia page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Jerry 15:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Your recent edit to Peace of Westphalia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
<div class="notice" style="background:#fe9b8b; border:1px solid #AAA; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto;">
Your repeated efforts to vandalize articles makes it seem that you are unaware that Wikipedia is a serious project. You have been reported to the administration group for continuing vandalism and an administrator will review your contributions shortly. You may not receive another warning before being blocked, so be careful and be serious from now on. If you are blocked, please consider changing your behavior when the block expires.</div>

--Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 22:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


April 2007

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to El Escorial, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.. KZ Talk • Contribs 03:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice


June 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Homestar Runner, you will be blocked from editing. DarkAudit 14:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Condom (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Natural gas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Natural gas was changed by 72.10.125.195 (c) (t) deleting 16359 characters on 2007-09-14T10:10:39+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 14:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Phgao 14:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Natural gas:

Your recent edit to Natural gas (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 14:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Phgao 14:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
--Ed (Edgar181) 14:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Location

Ct, Connecticut Route 81

Pikazilla 15:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ketchup. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TheProf | Talk 14:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brush, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Artificial insemination, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nuclear warfare, you will be blocked from editing. Tanvir che (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Chamorro people has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. StaticGull  Talk  12:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cable television, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cable television was changed by 72.10.125.195 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-16T13:25:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the recent edit you made to Matt Coyle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 14:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Nobel Peace Prize worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  14:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lamp (electrical component). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SpiderJon (talk) 12:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72.10.125.195&oldid=243412191"