Angelika Seibt

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Angelika Seibt (born October 7, 1954 in Bernburg (Saale) ) is a German psychologist and expert on manuscripts as well as the author of scientific publications on the psychology of writing and comparative writing .

Life

Angelika Seibt

Already during her high school days, Seibt began training in graphology , a first component of her later work as a psychological consultant and writing expert . She studied social pedagogy at the State University of Applied Sciences in Munich as well as philosophy , philosophy of science , psychology and sociology at the Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich with Wolfgang Stegmüller , Andreas Kemmerling , Matthias Varga von Kibéd and Walter Bühl, among others. She received her doctorate in 1984 with the dissertation “Philosophy of Science Thoughts on the Foundation of Writing Psychology. A philosophical reflection based on the transcendental-hermeneutic language pragmatics K.-O. Apels ”.

In addition, she completed training as a script expert at the University of Mannheim with Lothar Michel . After passing the exam, she was accepted as a member of the Society for Forensic Written Examination in 1988 . In 1995, the public appointment and swearing in as experts for handwriting analysis by the Government of Upper Bavaria .

Seibt worked as a freelancer from 1979 to 2016, initially mainly as a writing psychologist in coaching and personnel consulting for companies , especially for the Doblinger group of companies . After her public appointment and swearing in, she worked almost exclusively as an expert for courts in Germany and Austria. In addition, from 1992 to 1996 she was an honorary member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Writing Psychology and Writing Expertise (EGS) and from 2000 to 2005 she was editor of the Zeitschaft for Writing Psychology and Comparative Writing (ZFS).

She has been married to Georg Seibt since 1979.

plant

The Graphology has an unscientific Image and is not sufficient for a professional consulting practice in its traditional form from. Therefore, Seibt had the task of looking for a scientific justification of the psychology of writing through transparent methods and a further development for consulting practice. Together with Georg Seibt, she developed an IT system for HR consulting that has been used in practice for around 15 years. In order to make the method of interpretation of the psychology of writing easy to understand and teachable, she developed principles of interpretation and systems for writing description and personality description.

A clear distinction can be made between graphology and forensic font comparison : Graphology aims to capture character traits from handwriting. The forensic Schriftvergleichung it comes to Urheberidentifierzierung a questionable signature piece. Writing psychology explores the psychological, physiological, technical writing and social development conditions of handwritten writing with empirical methods. The knowledge of such conditions of creation is important for both writing psychological advice and for comparing scriptures. B. Intentions, writing practice and material-technical influences must be recognized. Seibt analyzed the social science dimension of forensic handwriting comparison and called for social science research. Understanding intentions is central to many hypotheses in which the comparison of scriptures is central, as has been shown in case studies.

In addition, Seibt has rendered outstanding services to the scientific development of methods of forensic writing comparison, which have also found their way into her practical work as publicly appointed and sworn experts: While a narrative, narrative written description was taught in her training, she has scales and measuring techniques defined in order to capture font characteristics as an empirical basis for a comparative analysis of fonts. She showed rules for evaluating findings and understood hypotheses as tools for evaluating findings that were used in her forensic written reports. While a verbal and everyday concept of probability was used in her training, she gained a numerical degree of probability as the result of an investigation by comparing hypotheses.

Signatures and wills. Practice of forensic writing examination is a standard work of forensic writing comparison. It “defines itself as a practical aid for laypeople; with the aim of better understanding the questions that arise in connection with forensic written examinations in court proceedings ”. "It deals with frequently occurring problems such as the burden of proof, connecting facts, falsification of documents, examination of photocopies, font development, fonts with a high degree of variation and the importance of the degree of probability as a result of an investigation." "It contains a wealth of questions and aspects that arise in court hearings and the practical work of comparing scriptures and knowledge of which is essential for practice. ”“ The easily legible and useful for legal practice handbook is a qualified and therefore indispensable aid in establishing the truth. ”

Quality assurance and the information of judges and lawyers were important to him. She got involved through publications in criminalistics and the Neue Juristische Wochenschrift , at the Week of Justice in Munich 2000, on the 5th Munich Inheritance Law and Probate Court Day of the Bavarian Bar Association in 2009, and at the Society for Legal Information 2009.

Fonts (selection)

  • Disposition, prognosis, personality. The structure of the psychological assessment of professional success in contrast to the concept of disposition in empirical personality research. In: Journal of Human Studies. Vol. 54, 1990, pp. 221-238.
  • Writing psychology. Theories, research results, theoretical principles. Profil, Munich 1994, ISBN 3-89019-354-4 .
  • The social science dimension of forensic handwriting comparison. In: Journal of Human Studies. Volume 58, 1994, pp. 247-255. Also in quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
  • Forensic written reports. Introduction to method and practice. CH Beck, Munich 1999, ISBN 3-406-45341-4 .
  • Demonstration material in forensic written reports. In: The expert. Organ of the Federal Association of Publicly Appointed, Sworn and Qualified Experts BVS. Volume 26, 1999, pp. 27-29.
  • Comparative written findings: scales and measuring techniques. In: Journal for Writing Psychology and Writing Comparison. Volume 64, 2000, pp. 38-53.
  • Forensic script comparison and script psychology. In: Criminology. Volume 58, 2004, pp. 267-272.
  • Quality features of forensic written reports. Updated article from the Journal of Writing Psychology and Comparative Writing. Volume 68, 2004, pp. 44-62. In: Quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
  • Probability as a comparison of hypotheses. In: Criminology. Volume 59, 2005, pp. 175-179.
  • Methodically structured approach as a means of quality assurance. In: Journal for Writing Psychology and Writing Comparison. Volume 69, 2005, pp. 130-178.
  • Forensic handwriting examination as a science. In: Criminology. Volume 60, 2006, pp. 599-608.
  • Signatures and wills. Practice of forensic writing examination. CH Beck, Munich 2008, ISBN 978-3-406-58113-7 .
  • Experience with the VSC4Plus. In: Criminology. Volume 63, 2009, pp. 712-716.
  • Measurements of general and special font characteristics. Lecture at the 8th international congress of the Society for Forensic Written Examination (GFS) in Dresden 2010. In: Quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
  • Past, present and future of forensic script comparison. Lecture at the 26th international congress of the European Society for Writing Psychology and Writing Expertise (EGS) in Lindau 2012. In: Quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
  • Social science research on font changes. In: Criminology. Volume 67, 2013, pp. 766-775.
  • Handwriting language. Introduction to writing psychology. CreateSpace Independent Publishing, Rottach-Egern 2017, ISBN 978-1-5427-4428-7 .

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. ↑ Compare the information in the catalog of the German National Library.
  2. ↑ [1] European Society for Writing Psychology and Writing Expertise (EGS)
  3. ↑ Archived copy ( memento of the original dated August 30, 2018 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. Zeitschaft for script psychology and script comparison (ZFS) @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / www.amazon.de
  4. ↑ * Philosophical considerations on the basis of the psychology of writing. A philosophical reflection based on the transcendental-hermeneutic language pragmatics K.-O. Apels inaugural dissertation to obtain the doctoral degree in philosophy at the Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich in 1984.
    • Disposition, prognosis, personality. The structure of the psychological assessment of professional success in contrast to the concept of disposition in empirical personality research. In: Journal of Human Studies. Vol. 54, 1990, pp. 221-238.
    • Writing psychology. Theories, research results, theoretical principles. Profil, Munich 1994, ISBN 3-89019-354-4 .
  5. ↑ Methodically structured approach as a means of quality assurance. In: Journal for Writing Psychology and Writing Comparison. Volume 69, 2005, pp. 130-178.
  6. ↑ Language of handwriting. Introduction to writing psychology. CreateSpace Independent Publishing, Rottach-Egern 2017, ISBN 978-1-5427-4428-7 .
  7. ↑ * The social science dimension of forensic handwriting comparison. In: Journal of Human Studies. Volume 58, 1994, pp. 247-255. Also in quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
    • Forensic script comparison and script psychology. In: Criminology. 58, 2004, pp. 267-272.
    • Forensic handwriting examination as a science. In: Criminology. 60, 2006, pp. 599-608.
    • Past, present and future of forensic script comparison. Lecture at the 26th international congress of the European Society for Writing Psychology and Writing Expertise (EGS) in Lindau 2012. In: Quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
  8. ↑ Social science research on font changes. In: Criminology. Volume 67, 2013, pp. 766-775.
  9. ↑ * Comparative written findings: scales and measuring techniques. In: Journal for Writing Psychology and Writing Comparison. Volume 64, 2000, pp. 38-53.
    • Signatures and wills. Practice of forensic writing examination. CH Beck, Munich 2008, ISBN 978-3-406-58113-7 .
    • Measurements of general and special font characteristics. Lecture at the 8th international congress of the Society for Forensic Written Examination (GFS) in Dresden 2010. In: Quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
  10. ↑ * Aspects of the evaluation of the findings. In: Proceedings of the 1st international congress of the Society for Forensic Written Examination (GFS). Berlin 1993.
    • The importance of the comparison of hypotheses for the result of handwriting examinations. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international congress of the Society for Forensic Written Examination (GFS). Lucerne 1997.
    • Forensic written reports. Introduction to method and practice. CH Beck, Munich 1999, ISBN 3-406-45341-4 .
    • Hypotheses and sub-hypotheses. In: Lecture at the 7th International Congress of the Society for Forensic Writing Examination (GFS) Salzburg 2007.
    • Signatures and wills. Practice of forensic writing examination. CH Beck, Munich 2008, ISBN 978-3-406-58113-7 .
  11. ↑ * Numerical and verbal probability statements using the example of counterfeiting. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international congress of the Society for Forensic Written Examination (GFS). The Hague 1995.
    • Probability as a comparison of hypotheses. In: Criminology. Volume 59, 2005, pp. 175-179.
    • Signatures and wills. Practice of forensic writing examination. CH Beck, Munich 2008, ISBN 978-3-406-58113-7 .
  12. ↑ Dr. Peter W. Pfefferli: Writing examination - an introduction for clients. In: Criminology. 2/2009, p. 94.
  13. ↑ Review of signatures and wills. Practice of forensic writing examination. In: specialist journal Haus & Grund Lower Saxony. December 2008, p. 15.
  14. ↑ Dr. Walter Brandner: Book review: Dr. Angelika Seibt: signatures and wills. Practice of forensic writing examination. In: Graphology News. November 2008.
  15. ^ Ernst Sarres, RA / FAFam / FAErbR: Review of signatures and wills. Practice of forensic writing examination. In: Journal for Inheritance Law and Property Succession. May 2009, p. 94.
  16. ↑ * Demonstration material in forensic written reports. In: The expert. Organ of the Federal Association of Publicly Appointed, Sworn and Qualified Experts BVS. Volume 26, 1999, pp. 27-29.
    • Problems examining photocopies and other non-originals. Updated article from the Journal of Writing Psychology and Comparative Writing. Volume 68, 2004, pp. 164-174. In: Quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
    • Quality features of forensic written reports. Updated article from the Journal of Writing Psychology and Comparative Writing. Volume 68, 2004, pp. 44-62. In: Quality features of forensic written reports. Lectures and essays. Kindle e-book, Rottach-Egern 2016.
    • Experience with the VSC4Plus. In: Criminology. Volume 63, 2009, pp. 712-716.
  17. ↑ * Attorney Bernhard F. Klinger / Dr. Angelika Seibt: Forgery of will - what now? In: New legal weekly special. 22/2010, p. 679.
    • Bernhard F. Klinger / Dr. Angelika Seibt: Determining the age of wills. In: New legal weekly. Special 6/2011, p. 167.
    • Dr. Angelika Seibt / Lawyer Wolfgang Roth: Requirements for forensic written reports. In: New legal weekly. Special 4/2014, p. 111.
  18. ^ [2] Justice Week Munich
  19. ^ [3] Bavarian Lawyers Association
  20. ^ [4] Society for Legal Information
personal data
SURNAME Seibt, Angelika
BRIEF DESCRIPTION German psychologist and expert for manuscripts and author
DATE OF BIRTH October 7, 1954
PLACE OF BIRTH Bernburg (Saale)