Simultaneity (philosophy)

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Simultaneity or simultaneity by means Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) an exchange of personal current messages, deriving from historical facts and events. This mediation applies to those who are ready to derive a personal lesson from these historical facts. It is a method in hermeneutics and exegesis . Kierkegaard gave the concept of simultaneity - omnia simul - a special theological character that is particularly important for biblical exegesis . Simultaneity thus represents a special task for consciousness. It is an achievement that is expected of the believer. It is about conveying the historical saving act of Christ so totally into the now that it is experienced and experienced as present for the believer or is taken seriously.

Related terms

The concept of conception is to be named as synonymous. It seems essential that here not one-sided concept formation, i.e. thought processes, are in the foreground, but also feeling , imagination and fantasy activity as well as dream structures play an essential role. Kant also spoke of the schematism of the imagination. These abilities enable the past to be made present through the act of experience . In the French language, for example, the word représentation, according to its origin, stands for the same qualitative processes of consciousness, cf. also the internationalization of this article. Because of this more psychological than historically exact meaning, simultaneity is understood as a relativization of the purely historical .

Aesthetic awareness

According to Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900–2002) simultaneity is a property of aesthetic awareness. Aesthetic awareness is characterized by content abstraction from taste . Not only what is custom and custom in a very specific culture, but also what deviates from the preservation of the ancestral, is the subject of this awareness. Instead of the unity of taste, there is a flexible feeling of quality. The historical relativity of taste is also aware of this feeling, see also the criticism made of historicism . The requirement of simultaneity implies that the alien and the different in history are simultaneously present in oneself. Wilhelm Dilthey (1833–1911) had exactly this idea in mind when he stated : “ The interpretation [of history or a historical text] would be impossible if the expressions of life were completely foreign. It would be unnecessary if nothing was alien in them. So it lies between these two extreme opposites . "

Individual evidence

  1. Kierkegaard, Søren : Philosophical Brocken . 4th chap. ö.
  2. Kierkegaard, Søren : Practice in Christianity by Anti-Climacus . (Copenhagen 1850) with the revocation of the pseudonym Anti-Climacus from 1855; in: S. Kierkegaard: work edition . Vol. II, pages 5-307; Düsseldorf-Cologne 1971 translated by E. Hirsch; Pages 71-74
  3. Rahner, Karl & Herbert Vorgrimler: Small Theological Dictionary . Herder library, Freiburg 1961; Page 137 f.
  4. Gadamer, Hans-Georg : Truth and Method. Basic features of a philosophical hermeneutics . Collected works, JCB Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen 1990, Hermeneutics I, Volume I, ISBN 3-16-145616-5 ; Pages 91 ff., 126 ff., 132, 395; Hermeneutics II, Volume II, ISBN 3-16-146043-X , pages 33, 55, 220, 232, 321, 432, 471 f.
  5. Drewermann, Eugen : Depth Psychology and Exegesis 1 . The truth of forms. Dream, myth, fairy tale, saga and legend. dtv non-fiction book 30376, Munich 1993, ISBN 3-423-30376-X , © Walter-Verlag, Olten 1984, ISBN 3-530-16852-1 , pages 123 ff.
  6. Dilthey, Wilhelm : The structure of the historical world in the humanities . Collected Writings. Edited by B. Groethuysen Stuttgart-Göttingen 1958, Vol. VII, page 225.