Ingelfinger rule

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Ingelfinger rule ( English Ingelfinger rule ) states that once published article a second time to be accepted by a scientific journal.

history

The Ingelfinger Rule was established in 1969 by Franz J. Ingelfinger , then editor of The New England Journal of Medicine ( NEJM ). The rule was adopted by most scientific journals and shaped the research landscape.

properties

The Ingelfinger Rule is designed to ensure that medical research reports should be peer-reviewed before being touted to the general public. Doctors are better able to evaluate medical innovations than lay people. Premature promotion of medical research results only adds to the confusion of the public. In addition, researchers should be prevented from artificially increasing their publication rate through multiple reprints in specialist journals. Online pre-publications and duplication in web archives (e.g. ArXiv ) break this rule for online publications.

literature

Individual evidence

  1. a b Arnold S. Relman: The Ingelfinger Rule. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 305, 1981, pp. 824-826, doi : 10.1056 / NEJM198110013051408 .
  2. ^ E. Marshall: Franz Ingelfinger's Legacy Shaped Biology Publishing . In: Science . 282, No. 5390, 1998, pp. 861-3, 865-7. doi : 10.1126 / science.282.5390.861 . PMID 9841429 .
  3. Vincent Larivière, Yves Gingras: On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007) (PDF; 199 kB)
  4. Christine L. Borgman: Scholarship in the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the Internet , MIT Press, October 31, 2007, ISBN 978-0-262-02619-2 , p. 99
  5. S Harnad: Ingelfinger Over-Ruled: The Role of the Web in the Future of Refereed Medical Journal Publishing Archived from the original on December 28, 2012. Info: The archive link was automatically inserted and not yet checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. In: The Lancet Perspectives . 356, 2000, p. S16. doi : 10.1016 / S0140-6736 (00) 92002-6 . @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk