Salzburg Bar Association

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Bar Association Salzburg is the professional organization of State in Salzburg established lawyers and trainee lawyers. The Bar Association has its seat in the city of Salzburg , where the Salzburg Regional Court is also the highest body of Salzburg's jurisdiction. President of the Salzburg Bar Association is currently Leopold Hirsch.

history

The Salzburg Bar Association was constituted for the first time on April 21, 1851 (date of foundation).

organization

The professional representation is a member of the Austrian Bar Association , an association of the bar associations of all Austrian federal states. Organizationally, the Bar Association is a public corporation with the right to autonomous self-administration and limited sovereign powers.

The areas of responsibility of the Salzburg Bar Association range from representing lawyers to assessing laws and drawing up reports to monitoring compliance with professional obligations by means of disciplinary law . Examination commissioners of the Bar Association who conduct examinations for trainee lawyers and trainee judges are members of the examination commissions set up at the Linz Higher Regional Court.

The highest decision-making body of the Bar Association is the committee, which is elected by the General Assembly of Salzburg Lawyers and is chaired by a president and two vice-presidents. In addition, the Disciplinary Board and the Examination Commissioners are also elected by the General Assembly.

membership

Membership in the Salzburg Bar Association exists for registered attorneys (RA) and trainee attorneys (RAA). The voting rights in the general meeting are unevenly distributed between lawyers and trainee lawyers (approx. 1: 2 - RA: RAA). Associated with membership is the obligation to pay the chamber contribution. As of November 1, 2013, there were 427 lawyers registered in Salzburg and 89 trainee lawyers.

See also

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. ^ Peter Wrabetz in "Austria's Lawyers in Past and Present", 2nd edition, Vienna 2008, Verlag Österreich, ISBN 978-3-7046-5269-0 , p. 186 f.
  2. The Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) has ruled in decision G31 / 2013 et al., V20 / 2013 et al., Item 3.3. That in the case of votes in plenary assemblies, the existing regulation of prospective attorneys on a qualified right to vote and have a say should be permissible, if the different weighting satisfies the objective requirement arising from the principle of equality and is compatible with the democratic principle resulting from Art. 120a and Art. 120c B-VG . The weighting of votes in Section 24 (3) last sentence RAO, however, violates these constitutional requirements, because the fundamental equality of votes inherent in the democratic principle is generally broken, without there being a corresponding objective reason for this and because there is no objective differentiating regulation depending on the subject of the decision and different levels of concern of the respective group of members of the Chamber (e.g. the regulations of the allocation and contribution regulations that only apply to trainee lawyers). If it is a matter of matters in which the trainee lawyers are not particularly affected, it is permissible to provide for different weighting of votes (see also Anwalt Aktuell , 6/13, p. 19 and 7/13, p. 5 , Archived copy ( Memento of the original from November 3, 2013 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was automatically inserted and not yet checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this note. ). @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / www.anwaltaktuell.at
  3. There is one lawyer for every 1,240 inhabitants .