Stamford (UK Parliament constituency)
{{{name}}} | |
---|---|
[[{{{type}}} constituency]] for the House of Commons | |
Current constituency | |
Created | {{{year}}} |
Member of Parliament | None |
{{{name}}} | |
---|---|
[[{{{type}}} constituency]] for the House of Commons | |
Current constituency | |
Created | {{{year}}} |
Member of Parliament | None |
Stamford was a constituency in the county of Lincolnshire of the House of Commons for the Parliament of England to 1706 then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1868 when this was reduced to one.
Boundaries
The parliamentary borough was based upon the town of Stamford in the Parts of Kesteven (a traditional sub-division of the county of Lincolnshire).
When the borough constituency was abolished in 1885, the Stamford (or South Kesteven) division of Lincolnshire was created. This included the town of Stamford and surrounding territory. The county division was a considerably larger constituency than the borough one had been.
From the 1885 general election until the dissolution before the 1918 election the constituency was surrounded by to the north Sleaford; to the east Spalding; to the south east Wisbech; to the south North Northamptonshire; to the south west Rutland; to the west Melton and to the north west Newark. The constituency of Grantham was an enclave wholly surrounded by Stamford.
History
The Victoria County History of the County of Lincoln includes some information about the representation of Stamford in early times.
Stamford, on the other hand, which had sent Nicholas de Burton and Clement de Melton to the Parliament of 1295, only exercised what its burghers probably regarded as an onerous privilege once in the reign of Edward II when in 1322 it elected Eustace Malherbe and Hugh de Thurleby.
A further paragraph relates the position before and after the borough began to send representatives regularly in 1467.
Stamford for some 150 years after the reign of Edward II apparently forbore to exercise its onerous privilege of returning members. In the seventeenth century it was afflicted with the usual controversy prevalent in small communities as to where the right of election lay, and the Committee of Privileges reported in 1661 'That the right of election was in such freemen only as paid scot and lot'.
Namier and Brooke in The House of Commons 1754-1790 explained that before the Reform Act 1832 the right of election was in the inhabitants of the parliamentary borough paying scot and lot, a local tax. They estimated the number of voters at about 500. In that period, despite the comparatively large electorate, the constituency was a pocket borough of the Earl of Exeter and elections were uncontested formalities.
The Reform Act replaced the scot and lot franchise with an occupation franchise, which slightly reduced the size of the electorate. This was because the value of the property occupation of which conferred a vote, was higher than that for houses upon which scot and lot became payable.
The area was strongly Tory or Conservative in politics. From 1801 until 1918 it only twice elected an MP from other parties (a Whig in 1831 and a Liberal in 1880). Elections before the United Kingdom general election, 1874 were usually uncontested.
The borough had some distinguished representatives in the nineteenth century. It returned two of the three members of the triumvirate which attempted to lead the protectionist Tories in the House of Commons. The Marquess of Granby had little to commend himself as a political leader, apart from the social prestige of being the heir to the Duke of Rutland. He was briefly sole leader in 1848 before the triumvirate was created in the following year and continued until his resignation in 1851. J.C. Herries had at least held senior ministerial office. Both the Stamford MPs were easily eclipsed by the rising star of their colleague Benjamin Disraeli.
A more significant historical figure was Lord Robert Cecil (Viscount Cranborne 1865-1868) who represented the borough between 1853 and 1868. As the Marquess of Salisbury he was the leading figure in the Conservative Party from the death of Disraeli in 1881 until he retired as Prime Minister in 1902.
Another leading Conservative with connections to the borough was Sir Stafford Northcote, Bt the party leader in the House of Commons 1876-1885 (from 1881 at the same time as Salisbury was leader in the House of Lords). Northcote was a Stamford MP from 1858 to 1866.
Under the Reform Act 1867 the borough electorate was expanded, but it lost one seat in Parliament from the United Kingdom general election, 1868.
The Representation of the People Act 1884 further expanded the electorate. The Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 abolished the borough constituency but created an expanded county division of the same name. These changes took effect with the United Kingdom general election, 1885.
Under the Representation of the People Act 1918 the electorate was again expanded, but the Stamford area was combined with the county of Rutland in a new Rutland and Stamford constituency.
Members of Parliament
This is a list of people who were elected to represent the borough in the House of Commons between 1754 and 1918.
- Constituency abolished (1918)
Notes:-
- a An Irish peer.
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. |
Election notes
The bloc vote electoral system was used in two seat elections and first past the post for single member by-elections. Each voter had up to as many votes as there were seats to be filled. Votes had to be cast by a spoken declaration, in public, at the hustings (until the secret ballot was introduced in 1872).
Note on percentage change calculations: Where there was only one candidate of a party in successive elections, for the same number of seats, change is calculated on the party percentage vote. Where there was more than one candidate, in one or both successive elections for the same number of seats, then change is calculated on the individual percentage vote.
Note on sources: The information for the election results given below is taken from Namier and Brooke 1754-1790, Stooks Smith 1790-1832 and Craig from the United Kingdom general election, 1832. Where Stooks Smith gives additional information or differs from the other sources this is indicated in a note after the result.
Elections before 1754
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. |
Election results 1754-1800
1750s – |
Elections in the 1750s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | John Harvey Thursby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Robert Barbor | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1760s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | John Chaplin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | George Bridges Brudenell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Chaplin
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George René Aufrère | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Brudenell to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Bridges Brudenell | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | George René Aufrère | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1770s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Sir George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Henry Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1780s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Sir George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Henry Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Sir George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Henry Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1790s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Sir George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | The Earl of Carysfort | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Sir George Howard | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | The Earl of Carysfort | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Howard
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | John Leland | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Nonpartisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Election Results 1801-1918
1800s – 1810s – 1820s – 1830s – 1840s – 1850s – 1860s – 1870s – 1880s – 1890s – 1900s – 1910s |
Elections in the 1800s
- Creation of Carysfort as a peer of the United Kingdom
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Albemarle Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory gain from Nonpartisan | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Leland | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Albermarle Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Leland | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Albemarle Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Leland | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Albemarle Bertie | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Leland
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Evan Foulkes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Succession of Bertie as the 9th Earl of Lindsey
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Charles Chaplin | 306 | 68.30 | N/A | |
Whig | J. Jephson Oddy | 142 | 31.70 | N/A | |
Majority | 154 | 36.61 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 448 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Note (1809): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for two days
Elections in the 1810s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Evan Foulkes | 360 | 36.51 | N/A | |
Tory | The Lord Henniker | 354 | 35,90 | N/A | |
Whig | Gerard Noel Noel | 272 | 27.59 | N/A | |
Turnout | 986 (626 voted) | N/A | N/A |
Note (1812): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for two days
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Lord Thomas Cecil | 328 | 49.10 | N/A | |
Tory | Hon. William Henry Percy | 324 | 48.50 | N/A | |
Whig | Joseph Clayton Jennyns | 12 | 1.80 | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Best | 4 | 0.60 | N/A | |
Turnout | 668 (336 voted) | N/A | N/A |
Note (1818): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for one day
Elections in the 1820s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Lord Thomas Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Hon. William Henry Percy | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Lord Thomas Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Chaplin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Lord Thomas Cecil | 467 | 41.85 | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Chaplin | 335 | 30.02 | N/A | |
Whig | Charles Tennyson | 314 | 28.14 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,116 (667 voted) | N/A | N/A |
Note (1830): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for four days
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Lord Thomas Cecil | 390 | 37.21 | -4.64 | |
Whig | Charles Tennyson | 356 | 33.97 | +5.83 | |
Tory | Thomas Chaplin | 302 | 28.82 | -1.20 | |
Turnout | 1,048 (666 voted) | N/A | N/A |
Note (1831): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for three days
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Chaplin | 526 | 40.93 | +12.11 | |
Conservative | George Finch | 463 | 36.03 | N/A | |
Liberal | A.F. Gregory | 296 | 23.04 | -10.93 | |
Turnout | 1,285 (766 voted) | 90.01 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 851 |
Note (1832): Stooks Smith was the source for the number of electors voting and classified Chaplin and Finch as Tories and Gregory as a Whig candidate.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Chaplin | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | George Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Registered electors | 755 |
Note (1835): Stooks Smith classified Chaplin and Finch as Tory candidates.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Chaplin | 201 | 50.00 | N/A | |
Conservative | Marquess of Granby | 200 | 49.75 | N/A | |
Liberal | The Lord Langford | 1 | 0.25 | N/A | |
Turnout | 402 (201 voted) | 29.39 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 684 |
Note (1837): Stooks Smith was the source for the number of electors voting and classified Chaplin and Granby as Tories and Langford as a Whig candidate. Langford retired before the poll.
- Resignation of Chaplin
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir George Clerk, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Note (1838): Stooks Smith classifies Clerk as a Tory.
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir George Clerk, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Marquess of Granby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Registered electors | 661 |
- Note (1841): Stooks Smith classified Clerk and Granby as Tory candidates.
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Clerk as Master of the Mint
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir George Clerk, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Marquess of Granby | 349 | 39.98 | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. John Charles Herries | 288 | 32.99 | N/A | |
Conservative | John Rolt | 236 | 27.03 | N/A | |
Turnout | 873 (524 voted) | 85.06 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 616 |
Note (1847): Stooks Smith was the source for the number of electors voting and classified all three candidates as Tories. Stooks Smith has a registered electorate figure of 613, but Craig's figure of 616 is used to calculate turnout.
Elections in the 1850s
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Herries as Pesident of the Board of Control for India
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. John Charles Herries | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. John Charles Herries | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir Frederic Thesiger | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Registered electors | 661 |
- Resignation of Herries
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Robert Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Robert Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir Frederic Thesiger | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Registered electors | 529 |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Thesiger as Lord Chancellor and his elevation to the peerage as the 1st Baron Chelmsford
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Inglis | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Inglis as Lord Justice Clerk with the Scottish judicial title of Lord Glencorse
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Stafford Northcote, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Robert Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir Stafford Northcote, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Registered electors | 539 |
Elections in the 1860s
- Lord Robert Cecil became known by the courtesy title of Viscount Cranborne, following the death of his brother in 1865.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Viscount Cranborne | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir Stafford Northcote, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Registered electors | 512 |
- Resignation of Northcote, to contest North Devon, in 1866.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir John Charles Dalrymple Hay, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seats vacated on the appointment of Cranborne as Secretary of State for India and Hay as a Lord Commissioner of the Admiralty.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Viscount Cranborne | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir John Charles Dalrymple Hay, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
- Succession of Cranborne as the 3rd Marquess of Salisbury
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Viscount Ingestre | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
- Succession of Ingestre as the 19th Earl of Shrewsbury
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Unwin Heygate | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
- Constituency electorate expanded and representation reduced to one seat, by the Reform Act 1867 with effect from the United Kingdom general election, 1868.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir John Charles Dalrymple Hay, Bt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Registered electors | 1,094 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir John Charles Dalrymple Hay, Bt | 557 | 57.74 | N/A | |
Liberal | Marston Clarke Buszard | 411 | 42.46 | N/A | |
Majority | 146 | 15.08 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 968 | 81.83 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,183 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Marston Clarke Buszard | 601 | 52.17 | +9.71 | |
Conservative | Sir John Charles Dalrymple Hay, Bt | 551 | 47.83 | -9.71 | |
Majority | 50 | 4.34 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,152 | 91.79 | +9.96 | ||
Registered electors | 1,255 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | -9.71 (C to L) |
- Electorate expanded by the Representation of the People Act 1884 and parliamentary borough abolished and replaced by a county division (under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885) with substantial boundary changes; with effect from the United Kingdom general election, 1885.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Compton Lawrance | 4,647 | 56.94 | +9.11 | |
Liberal | J.S. Cudlip | 3,514 | 43.06 | -9.11 | |
Majority | 1,133 | 13.88 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,161 | 83.78 | -8.01 | ||
Registered electors | 9,741 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +9.11 (L to C) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Compton Lawrance | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Lawrance as a Justice of the High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division).
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry John Cockayne Cust | 4,236 | 51.72 | N/A | |
Liberal | Arthur Priestley | 3,954 | 48.28 | N/A | |
Majority | 282 | 3.44 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,190 | 77.81 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 10,526 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1890s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry John Cockayne Cust | 4,150 | 50.76 | -0.96 | |
Liberal | Arthur Priestley | 4,026 | 49.24 | +0.96 | |
Majority | 124 | 1.52 | -1.92 | ||
Turnout | 8,176 | 84.00 | +6.19 | ||
Registered electors | 9,733 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | -0.96 (C to L) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Younger | 4,203 | 52.43 | +1.67 | |
Liberal | Arthur Priestley | 3,814 | 47.57 | -1.67 | |
Majority | 389 | 4.85 | +3.33 | ||
Turnout | 8,017 | 83.02 | -0.98 | ||
Registered electors | 9,657 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +1.67 (L to C) |
Elections in the 1900s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Younger | 4,292 | 55.83 | +3.40 | |
Liberal | Lewis Haslam | 3,395 | 44.17 | -3.40 | |
Majority | 897 | 11.67 | +6.82 | ||
Turnout | 7,687 | 80.63 | -1.39 | ||
Registered electors | 9,534 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +3.40 (L to C) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord John Joicey-Cecil | 4,559 | 53.15 | -2.68 | |
Liberal | F.P. Rawson | 4,018 | 46.85 | +2.68 | |
Majority | 541 | 6.31 | -5.36 | ||
Turnout | 8,577 | 87.68 | +7.05 | ||
Registered electors | 9,782 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | -2.68 (C to L) |
Elections in the 1910s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hon. Claude Willoughby | 4,666 | 51.98 | -1.17 | |
Liberal | G.H. Parkin | 4,310 | 48.02 | +1.17 | |
Majority | 356 | 3.97 | -2.34 | ||
Turnout | 8,976 | 89.26 | +1.58 | ||
Registered electors | 10,056 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | -1.17 (C to L) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hon. Claude Willoughby | 4,545 | 51.94 | -0.04 | |
Liberal | G.H. Parkin | 4,206 | 48.06 | +0.04 | |
Majority | 339 | 3.87 | -0.10 | ||
Turnout | 8,751 | 87.02 | -2.24 | ||
Registered electors | 10,056 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | -0.04 (C to L) |
- Constitiuency abolished (1918}
Sources
References
- Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885-1972, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Parliamentary Reference Publications 1972)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1977)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1885-1918, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1974)
- The House of Commons 1754-1790, by Sir Lewis Namier and John Brooke (HMSO 1964)
- The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844-50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F.W.S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973)) out of copyright
- The Victoria County History of the County of Lincoln: Volume 2, edited by William Page (First published in 1906; reprinted 1988 by Dawsons for the University of London Institute of Historical Research) out of copyright
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832-1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume II 1886-1918, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1978)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume III 1919-1945, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1979)