Implementation skills

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Execution competence (or execution competence ) in organizational theory are rights and powers that are granted to a responsible body to fulfill the tasks assigned to it. The opposite is leadership skills . The rights and obligations that the federal states assume when executing federal laws are also referred to in public law as executive or executive competence.

General

The organization's principle of congruence requires that the responsible authority is given appropriate competencies for the tasks assigned to it, so that it can also take responsibility for the goal-oriented fulfillment of tasks and be accountable . Implementation competencies affect both employees with executive and managerial activities, with the latter predominantly being granted implementation competencies with a higher degree of autonomy. According to Erich Kosiol , the lowest positions and authorities have execution competence and are fully responsible for their own tasks.

species

Execution competencies are made up of execution, disposition, application, decision-making, guideline, participation, ordering and representation competencies according to their increasing autonomy. Execution competencies allow the responsible party to work in the tasks assigned to him, whereby he is allowed to determine the working rhythm, method and time within a specified framework . The disposition authority allows him to request and dispose of operating and auxiliary equipment ( machines , tools , office supplies or information ) that are outside his own workplace and are used to complete a work task. The authority to apply grants him the right to submit applications for decisions to be made to authorities authorized to do so, which can result in the preparation of a decision proposal. In the context of implementation competence, decision-making competencies relate only to one's own area of ​​execution as individual situational decisions . In the case of executives, however, they are characterized by the fact that they grant a decision-maker the right to make constitutive external decisions with incomplete information with the highest entrepreneurial risk . The guideline authority as specific decision-making authority stipulates that the post holder may issue guidelines to subordinate areas. When it comes to having a say , a body may only make decisions if it has previously consulted another body and voted positively. The authority to issue orders determines which body may issue orders or instructions . The representation competence finally relates to represent other incumbents in preventing this the right or unfolded visibility because it assigns the holder the right, the organization ( company , authority to represent) outwards legally effective, at best, with powers of representation , such as power of attorney or power of attorney connected.

Public law

A distinction is made between regulatory and execution competence. While the regulatory authority the legislation concerned, including ability to execute the management , planning and part of the organization of the administrative authorities . The public authorities are institutions to which certain public tasks have been assigned by law or statutes . These task holders form part of the passive financial equalization , which consists of the delimitation of public tasks and task holders as well as the distribution of these tasks to the task holders. As a rule, the implementation and decision-making powers are congruent with the same authority. The social welfare office has the authority to implement social assistance and implements its decision-making authority through administrative acts.

The Art. 83 ff. Basic Law is headed "The execution of federal laws and the federal administration." Thereafter, the federal states usually implement the federal laws as a separate matter. This executive competence is the right or duty to perform public tasks , taking into account the intensity required by the decision-maker. According to Article 84.1 of the Basic Law, this includes the establishment of the authorities and the administrative procedure. The states are obliged to enact appropriate implementation laws and to carry out administrative implementation based on the principle of federal loyalty.

The federal government is therefore not allowed to implement its laws itself; it has no right of entry. Only in the case of a law enforcement by federal administration or by federal corporations or institutions under public law may the federal government implement its own laws ( Art. 86 GG). Since the federal states are usually responsible for the execution of the federal laws as their own affairs, they bear the expenditures arising from the fulfillment of the administrative tasks according to Art. 104a Abs. 1 GG.

See also

Individual evidence

  1. ↑ Erich Kosiol: Organization of the company. 1962, p. 115. (books.google.de)
  2. ^ Wilhelm Hill, Raymond Fehlbaum, Peter Ulrich: Organizational theory. Volume 1/2, 1994, p. 127 ff.
  3. ^ Siegfried G. Häberle (ed.): The new lexicon of business administration. 2008, p. 53. (books.google.de)
  4. ^ Wilhelm Hill, Raymond Fehlbaum, Peter Ulrich: Organizational theory. Volume 1/2, 1994, p. 129.
  5. ^ Thomas Wiedmann: Idea and shape of the region in Europe. 1996, p. 334.
  6. ^ Bernhard Seidel, Inge Schweiger, Dieter Cansier, Dietmar Kath: Public finances, credit and capital. 1985, p. 5. (books.google.de)