Conservation status (nature protection)

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The conservation status in nature and species protection is an assessment of the influences that affect the distribution and size of populations of protected species , or the distribution and species configuration of protected biotope types (referred to in this context as habitat types ). The term is mostly used in connection with the so-called Habitats Directive of the EU . The EU's Birds Directive also speaks of “maintaining or improving the populations of the relevant bird species” (Article 2).

In contrast to the Habitats Directive, in Red Lists of endangered species or habitats it is not the conservation status but the degree of endangerment that is assessed and indicated. Conservation status and degree of endangerment are roughly inversely proportional: a favorable conservation status corresponds to a low degree of endangerment, but are defined somewhat differently in detail. In species protection, the definition of the “favorable” conservation status according to the Habitats Directive is particularly important, because this has direct legal effect, while the degree of endangerment according to the Red List is only a legally non-binding expert judgment.

Degree of risk in the Red Lists

Status iucn3.1.svg

In the Red Lists of Endangered Species or Habitats, the endangerment situation is given in several stages between harmless and extinct.

The endangerment categories established by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) are increasingly being used in national Red Lists. In regional or older Red Lists, however, other names can very often be found.

Hazard categories that are used in the IUCN Red Lists, Germany and the older editions of Switzerland
Hazard category IUCN Germany Switzerland Meaning (short form)
Extinct, lost, extinct
Extinct
EX 0 0 There is no longer any known living individual in the world.

Extinct in the Wild extinct in nature
EW --- --- There are only living specimens left in captivity (e.g. in zoological gardens) or in culture (e.g. in botanical gardens ) or in naturalized populations outside the natural range of the species.
Regionally Extinct
Regionally Extinct
RE --- --- The species is registered as EX or EW in a national or regional red list.
Threatened with extinction
Critically Endangered
CR 1 1 The risk that the species will become extinct in the near future is extremely high.
Endangered
Endangered
EN 2 2 The risk that the species will become extinct in the near future is very high.
Endangered, Vulnerable
Vulnerable
VU 3 3 The risk that the species will become extinct in the near future is high.
Potentially
Near Threatened
NT V, 4 or R 4th The threshold values ​​for the hazard levels were only just undercut and / or will probably be exceeded in the near future.

Least concern is not at risk
LC * n The species was not classified in one of the categories NT to EX and is currently not considered endangered.
Insufficient data available
Data Deficient
DD D. --- The information available on the species is insufficient to allow a classification.
Not rated
Not Evaluated
NE 4b or - The species exists in the assessed area but has not been assessed.

Conservation status according to the Fauna-Flora-Habitat Directive

In the Fauna-Flora-Habitat Directive , the concept of conservation status is defined separately for habitats and species:

  • The conservation status of a natural habitat is determined by the totality of the effects that influence the habitat concerned and the characteristic species occurring therein and which can have long-term effects on its natural distribution, its structure and its functions as well as the survival of its characteristic species (Article 1 lit. e Directive 92/43 / EEC ).
  • The conservation status of a species is determined by the totality of influences that can have long-term effects on the distribution and size of the populations of the species concerned (Article 1 lit. i Directive 92/43 / EEC).

In accordance with Article 17 of the Fauna-Flora-Habitat Directive, the EU member states must prepare a report every six years which, among other things, includes the conservation status for all species and habitat types (collectively referred to as protected assets) that are included in the appendices to the Fauna-Flora-Habitat Directive are listed and have their natural range in the respective EU country. The evaluation must be carried out separately according to the biogeographical regions of the EU and is carried out in a three-stage system:

code colour Category (English) Category (German) Meaning (short form)
FV
  • 
  • favorable Cheap The protected property is not endangered, the area of ​​distribution and the available habitat do not decrease and are dimensioned in such a way that the population is still able to survive (for full definition see Article 1 lit. e and i of Directive 92/43 / EEC).
    U1
  • 
  • unfavorable – inadequate unfavorable – insufficient The protected item is not yet acutely endangered, but concrete measures are required to bring the protected item into a favorable state of conservation.
    U2
  • 
  • unfavorable – bad unfavorable – bad The survival of the protected property is, at least regionally, strongly endangered.
    XX
  • 
  • unknown unknown The available data on a protected property are not sufficient for an assessment of the conservation status.

    In order to obtain comparability across all EU member states, the methodology for determining the conservation status is standardized. In addition to the actual conservation status of a protected asset, several parameters (natural range, population size, condition of the species habitat, area of ​​a habitat and so on) are assessed and short and long-term trends are recorded for each species and each habitat type.

    See also

    Individual evidence

    1. BfN Federal Agency for Nature Conservation: Guidelines and nature conservation requirements that are anchored in the Habitats and Birds Guidelines. Retrieved on June 14, 2015 ( Memento of the original from May 17, 2015 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / www.bfn.de
    2. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2012): IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 3.1 Second edition, 38 pp. [PDF]
    3. Ludwig, G., Haupt, H., Gruttke, H. & Binot-Hafke, M. (2009): Methodology of Hazard Analysis for Red Lists. In: Haupt et al. (Ed.): Red List of Endangered Animals, Plants and Fungi in Germany, Vol. 1: Vertebrates, Nature Conservation and Biological Diversity 70 (1), p. 19-71. [PDF]
    4. Cordillot, F. & Klaus, G. (2011): Endangered Species in Switzerland. Synthesis of Red Lists, status 2010. Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN, Bern), 111 pp. ( Memento of the original from July 11, 2016 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was automatically inserted and not yet checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. [PDF] @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / www.bafu.admin.ch
    5. Fauna-Flora-Habitat Directive (Council Directive 92/43 / EEC of May 21, 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild animals and plants in the consolidated version of January 1, 2007 )
    6. a b Assessment and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive - Reporting Formats for the period 2007–2012, May 2011, 19 pp. [PDF]