Chamber election in Luxembourg 2018 / polls and forecasts
This article presents surveys and forecasts for the 2018 chamber election .
Sunday question
Ifop survey from November 2017
Compared to the 2013 election (rounded to half percentage points)
%
40
30th
20th
10
0
39
15th
13
13
8th
6th
3
1
1
1
Gains and losses
date | source | CSV | LSAP | DP | Greng | ADR | Lenk | PPLU | PID | KPL | Otherwise. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
November 2017 | Ifop | 39 | 15th | 13 | 13 | 8th | 6th | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Chamber election 2013 | 33.7 | 20.3 | 18.3 | 10.1 | 6.6 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 1.4 | - |
Seat forecasts
date | source | CSV | LSAP | DP | Greng | ADR | Lenk | KPL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2018 | TNS | 26th | 9 | 10 | 7th | 5 | 3 | - |
December 2017 | TNS | 27 | 10 | 10 | 6th | 4th | 3 | - |
May 2017 | TNS | 29 | 10 | 9 | 6th | 3 | 3 | - |
December 2016 | TNS | 28 | 10 | 10 | 6th | 3 | 3 | - |
June 2016 | TNS | 27 | 10 | 7th | 7th | 6th | 3 | - |
January 2016 | Day sheet | 27 | 10 | 8th | 6th | 5 | 3 | 1 |
January 2015 | TNS | 27 | 11 | 10 | 6th | 3 | 3 | - |
Chamber election 2013 | 23 | 13 | 13 | 6th | 3 | 2 | - |
Sunday question about constituency
Indication in percent, in brackets forecast number of seats.
center
date | source | CSV | DP | LSAP | Greng | ADR | Lenk | PPLU | PID | KPL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2018 | TNS | 36.1 (9) | 20.6 (5) | 11.8 (2) | 11.2 (2) | 8.6 (2) | 5.4 (1) | |||
December 2017 | TNS | 39.7 (9) | 20.5 (5) | 12.5 (3) | 11.4 (2) | 5.3 (1) | 6.2 (1) | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
May 2017 | TNS | 41.8 (10) | 17.9 (3) | 12.1 (3) | 10.7 (2) | 6.9 (1) | 6.5 (1) | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 |
December 2016 | TNS | 39.4 (9) | 19.8 (5) | 13.5 (3) | 10.6 (2) | 6.2 (1) | 6.3 (1) | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
July 2015 | Day sheet | 42.1 (10) | 19.4 (4) | 13.7 (3) | 9.6 (2) | 14.2 (ADR 1; Lenk 1) | ||||
January 2015 | TNS | 40.2 (9) | 20.9 (5) | 14.7 (3) | 10.3 (2) | 13.9 (2) | ||||
Chamber election 2013 | 35.3 (8) | 25.0 (6) | 14.7 (3) | 10.5 (2) | 5.0 (1) | 4.8 (1) | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
east
date | source | CSV | DP | LSAP | Greng | ADR | Lenk | PPLU | PID | KPL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2018 | TNS | 36.1 | 17.7 | 11.6 | 14.6 | 9.7 | 6.3 | |||
December 2017 | TNS | 40.1 (3) | 16.9 (1) | 11.1 (1) | 13.0 (1) | 12.2 (1) | 2.8 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 |
May 2017 | TNS | 44.8 (4) | 14.2 (1) | 12.9 (1) | 12.8 (1) | 8.4 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.0 |
January 2016 | Day sheet | 42.5 (3) | 11.5 (1) | 11.7 (1) | 11.7 (1) | 12.7 (1) | 3.9 | 6.0 | ||
July 2015 | Day sheet | 41.0 (4) | 14.5 (1) | 12.1 (3) | 12.2 (2) | 10.3 (1) | 4.2 | 3.2 | 2.5 | |
January 2015 | TNS | 40.9 (4) | 15.8 (1) | 13.2 (1) | 11.1 (1) | 9.2 | 9.8 | |||
Chamber election 2013 | 36.9 (3) | 18.6 (2) | 14.6 (1) | 13.1 (1) | 8.7 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
north
date | source | CSV | DP | LSAP | Greng | ADR | PPLU | PID | Lenk | KPL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2018 | TNS | 37.1 | 20.3 | 14.3 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 4.4 | |||
December 2017 | TNS | 41.8 (5) | 17.7 (2) | 14.8 (1) | 10.1 (1) | 5.5 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 0.2 |
May 2017 | TNS | 41.1 (5) | 15.1 (2) | 14.3 (1) | 9.9 (1) | 7.4 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 6.0 | 0.6 |
June 2016 | TNS | 33.69 (4) | (1) | 18.2 (2) | (1) | 9.2 | ||||
January 2015 | TNS | 40.2 (5) | 18.5 (2) | 11.8 (1) | 10.3 (1) | 19.2 | ||||
Chamber election 2013 | 33.7 (4) | 23.7 (2) | 17.2 (2) | 9.0 (1) | 6.4 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 0.9 |
south
date | source | CSV | LSAP | DP | Greng | ADR | Lenk | PPLU | KPL | PID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2018 | TNS | 34.0 (9) | 19.9 (5) | 10.5 (2) | 12.0 (3) | 9.3 (2) | 7.3 (2) | 3.1 | 3.0 | 0.9 |
December 2017 | TNS | 36.7 (10) | 20.6 (5) | 10.0 (2) | 10.7 (2) | 7.9 (2) | 7.7 (2) | 3.0 | 2.2 | 1.1 |
May 2017 | TNS | 35.9 (10) | 20.4 (5) | 9.5 (2) | 10.2 (2) | 10 (2) | 7.3 (2) | 2.9 | 2.8 | 1.1 |
December 2016 | TNS | 35.8 (10) | 20.1 (5) | 9 (2) | 10.5 (2) | 10.4 (2) | 8 (2) | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.3 |
January 2015 | TNS | (9) | (6) | (2) | (2) | (2) | (2) | |||
Chamber election 2013 | 32.2 (8) | 25.2 (7) | 12.7 (3) | 9.8 (2) | 7.5 (2) | 5.7 (1) | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.4 |
More surveys
Preferred coalition polls
The percentages indicate which proportion of respondents thinks the potential coalition is good, or most prefer it.
Institute | date |
CSV LSAP |
LSAP DP Greng Lenk |
CSV DP |
LSAP DP Greng |
CSV Greng |
CSV ADR |
CSV (alone) |
LSAP DP |
LSAP Greng |
DP Greng |
Other | No information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2018 | TNS | 9 | 11 | 13 | 18th | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4th | 4th | 12 | 19th | |
December 2017 | TNS | 11 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 8th | 19th | |
November 2017 | Ifop | 39 | 3 | 34 | 35 | 37 | 19th | ||||||
December 2016 | TNS | 13 | 9 | 11 | 17th | 5 | 4th | 3 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 18th |