Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Tiptoety (talk | contribs)
47,300 edits
Line 43: Line 43:
'''indefinite create-protection''' , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..[[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 00:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
'''indefinite create-protection''' , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..[[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 00:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
:Anticipating a "decline": what exactly is the benefit of preserving the ability of someone to recreate this page?[[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
:Anticipating a "decline": what exactly is the benefit of preserving the ability of someone to recreate this page?[[User:Largoplazo|—Largo Plazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
::{{RFPP|d}} Has only been deleted once. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 01:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


==== {{la|Pibo Prince Edward Island}} ====
==== {{la|Pibo Prince Edward Island}} ====

Revision as of 01:02, 11 October 2008


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Wookiee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism.LAAFansign review 00:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Move protected —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Pibo Manitoba (SSR) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 00:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Pibo Manitoba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected. —αἰτίας •discussion• 00:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Strange. The Twinkle UI told me that, so I'm surprised that it added my request anyway.—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Pibo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Pibo Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Cities of Pibo Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus category created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine category with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Nova Scotia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Anticipating a "decline": what exactly is the benefit of preserving the ability of someone to recreate this page?—Largo Plazo (talk) 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined Has only been deleted once. Tiptoety talk 01:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Prince Edward Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Has only been deleted once. Tiptoety talk 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Newfoundland and Labrador (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Has only been deleted once. Tiptoety talk 01:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo New Brunswick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Has only been deleted once. Tiptoety talk 01:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Quebec (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Has only been deleted once. Tiptoety talk 01:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Ontario (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Has only been deleted once. Tiptoety talk 00:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Manitoba (THE BEST) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected Tiptoety talk 00:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Saskatchewan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected Tiptoety talk 00:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Alberta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected Tiptoety talk 00:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo British Columbia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Has only been deleted once. Tiptoety talk 00:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Nunavut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected Tiptoety talk 00:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Northwest Territories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected Tiptoety talk 00:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Pibo Yukon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite create-protection , Was a bogus article name created by a repeat vandal. No chance of a genuine article with this title..—Largo Plazo (talk) 00:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Has only been deleted once. Tiptoety talk 00:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    As you can probably tell, it's part of this one person's ever-expanding pattern. Here's what seems to me to be a reasonable decision tree: Protect now, he comes back, nuisance is avoided; he doesn't come back, no harm done anyway because no one else will ever create this page. Don't protect now, it won't benefit anyone because no one will ever create this page; if he does come back, more vandalism. Why not protect? —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Murad Gumen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect The same IP has vandalized the article for over a month. Thanks!E10ddie (talk) 00:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

    Miss Universe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect for 2 weeks. High level of IP vandalism. Thank you. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three days. Tiptoety talk 00:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    American football (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect Heavy vandalism from numerous IPs. JNW (talk) 23:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of six days. Tiptoety talk 23:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Battle of Trenton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect Lots of ip vandals lately. Some inaccurate information slipped past me for a couple of days, so bad information was given out. I think it is because kids are back in school and are learning about the battle.-Kieran4 (talk) 22:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Tiptoety talk 23:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Tyra Banks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    long-term semi Persistent anon vandalism likely tied to her hit ANTM show (which runs another 5-7 weeks) rather than her talk show. -- Banjeboi 22:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for two weeks. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:35, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Nirvana (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, A ton of IP vandalism.Enigma message 21:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    William McDougall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect repeated attempts by IP to add bio to dab page. Tassedethe (talk) 21:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Anil Ambani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary semi protection Vandalism, Vandalism and repeated unsourced speculation.Waterden (talk) 18:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Brian Posehn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection Vandalism, Extremely high rate of recent vandalism.Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 18:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Faith Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. 7 vandalism attempts in the past three days, from different IPs, but most about Jacob the good-looking hispanic ex-boyfriend; no recent legit edits Rnickel (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most of it was on 8 Oct, only one today. SoWhy 20:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    British Isles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protection: This article has been swamped with IP accounts, all remarkably similar. The page is actually fully protected right now, but I think making it semi-protected might solve most of the trouble. ðarkuncoll 00:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. For the record, this report is misplaced (note it is under requests for unprotection). Tan | 39 15:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: Since it's currently fully protected, I would hope that administrators have not been vandalizing it! I think the request is for the article to be "unprotected" down to semi-protected status. — Satori Son 00:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Rocket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection Vandalism. This high profile article is extremely stable (only one bot edit in the last 50 edits over the last 8 days),[1] but under very frequent attack from anonymous IPs and new accounts. There has been about 10 vandalising edits in the last 24 hours. There is a case for permanent semi protection, but I'm requesting a week block in the hopes that it will quiet things down.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 17:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Satori Son 17:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Krakatoa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, This article is constantly vandalized by IPs. It was last unprotected on Sept. 13 and the history shows a never ending parade of vandalism reverts. RedWolf (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Satori Son 17:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    You Me At Six (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    The page has been protected from recreation as the band have been labled not notable enough. They have charting singles and have appeared on the front cover of Kerrang! I have worked on a page for the band in my user page User:Cabe6403/current2 and would like the page unprotected so I can create it with the information on the stated userpage. Cabe6403 (Talk•Please Sign my guest book!) 10:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    If a decision is reached either way could someone drop me a line on my talk page and let me know. Cheers Cabe6403 (Talk•Please Sign my guest book!) 10:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Unprotected. MastCell Talk 16:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    Shawty Lo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, As soon as the article got off of temporary semi-protection, anonymous vandals immediately and incessantly attacked the article. Please set an indefinite semi-protection to make them stop and login to change the article. All of the vandalism comes from anonymous ip addresses..User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 15:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also deleted numerous history revisions with significant WP:BLP violations. — Satori Son 15:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    David Caprio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection Vandalism. A political opponent (even after being defeated in the election) continues to vandalize the entire page. I would like the page reverted back to the 15:14, 14 September 2008 72.195.128.189 version and then permanently protected. The user that continues to deface the page is: caughtinnarragansett. You had previously put temporary protection on it through the election but he is back! Last time with the semi-protection some of his vandalism still made it through so I would like that 15:14, 14 September 2008 72.195.128.189 version. Thanks! 72.195.128.189 (talk) 13:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Single incidence of vandalism this month has been reverted and editor has been warned by another administrator. If they vandalize the article again, please report to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. If you need additional assistance, please visit Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Thank you. — Satori Son 15:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    History of measurement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Vandalism.Closedmouth (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Even though this article is being vandalized by a group related IP addresses, a range block would affect up to 65,536 addresses.[2] — Satori Son 14:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Kannada language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection IP Vandalism, repeatedly inclusion of false info,misleading other readers. need a break for a while. - C21K (talk) 13:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Editor warned instead. If they revert again, please report to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. — Satori Son 15:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Islam and iman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, There's persistent vandalism to this page..— Mini-Geek (talk) 11:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely as highly-visible transcluded template per WP:PROT#Permanent protection. — Satori Son 15:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Tooth and Nail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Lot of fighting over genres between IPs and accounts; could do with a break. Utan Vax (talk) 09:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of 72 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Satori Son 15:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Nadine Chandrawinata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect for 1 week. High IP vanalism in the last 2 days. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 04:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Satori Son 14:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Gallery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite semi-protection is a high risk, high visibility template as it is used in various articles to produce a gallery of images. Please remember to lock the subpages {{Gallery/aux}} as well. ChyranandChloe (talk) 03:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely as highly-visible transcluded template per WP:PROT#Permanent protection. — Satori Son 14:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Religion in China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full-protect for 2 weeks due to edit war between some users (me and Abstrakt) with a Muslim user, Editingman see all his latest contributions and you can see that he want to turn every people to Muslims or any country to Islam. Read the current discussion here. Thank you! Angelo De La Paz (talk) 03:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected.. — Satori Son 14:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Varg Vikernes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection Continued trolling by anonymous ip. He insists that this musician/criminal/political activists is also a writer and links obscure texts from the persons homepage in the article lead: (diff). Zara1709 (talk) 03:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Articles are not semi-protected to prevent contributions from only one editor. Please see dispute resolution. — Satori Son 14:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    Heaven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, Page is vandalized quite often, mostly by blanking it. .Classical geographer (talk) 09:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Satori Son 14:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Bean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection, temporary or otherwise - is repeatedly vandalized, often at least once per day. Green caterpillar (talk) 00:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Satori Son 14:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=244484677"