Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Haunted Angel (talk | contribs) at 00:28, 19 March 2007 (→‎Current requests for unprotection: Minor change). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Laptop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Heavy vandalism. RJASE1 Talk 00:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Saddam Hussein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protection... again... Although the SProtect lock is still displayed the month-long semiprotect expired yesterday according to the logs. Already the ips are flooding this obviously high-risk target. Valley2city 23:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Britney Spears discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi Protection. IP adresses (and some unexperimented users) are changing all the reliable information that I've added in the last weeks. They use unreliable sources or just change the whole articule without a source.

    They also change sales, positions and certifications without a source.
    Even Nielsen SoundScan sales have been changed them every day [and they're confirmed, there's a source!].

    I hope you understand and protect this articule, thanks. I hope this time you can protect it. Kraft. 23:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Vince Russo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    • Semi-protect. Repeated vandalism and insertion of opinion by anonymous users.Nonpareility 22:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    ijji

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism for 17days. -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 22:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Tyranno Hassleberry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Yu-Gi-Oh! GX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    • Semi-protect; continued anon. vandalism from multiple sources using impersonation. --Benten 21:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Rank-navy-1-.gif (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Full protect. A legitimate image has been edited by WP:LTA/Roitr and he keeps reverting to his POV fork, currently as Reboti (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). --Dmitry (talk •contibs ) 21:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    A block would probably do the trick better, assuming a static IP. Prodego talk 21:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Roitr has no static IP, and blocking by IP range means blocking half of Israel (which he is aware of and even puts as an argument why there is "no stopping" him. --Dmitry (talk •contibs ) 21:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I see. Well, there is no reason that he would just use that one image anyway, so it is probably pointless to protect it. Prodego talk 21:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, could you please deal with Botisaf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as well (he was engaged with reverting of the said image)?
    I don't quite follow the logic why the the protection is pointless. Wouldn't it prevent him from reverting these images to his POV forks? Even if he re-uploads them using a new name (as he did before), at least I will be able to track his modifications to the linked articles, unlike his current reverting actions which are not even shown in my watchlist... --Dmitry (talk •contibs ) 22:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    William E. Dudley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect -- Anon vandal is always removing the AfD notice from the article. ~~Eugene2x Sign here ☺ ~~ 21:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Anon blocked. Prodego talk 21:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Anon is editing from a dynamic IP and has deleted the AfD notice again. Sprotect would really help. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Fully protected We tried really hard. I hate semiprotecting an article during AFDs, so I will try a short temporal protection. -- ReyBrujo 23:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Birth control (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full Protect - Revert war between two users which is getting very close to violating the 3RR. While attempting to talk this edit over on the talk page, they keep changing the article and reverting it on each other because they haven't reached a consensus with each other. --pIrish 21:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected –Llama mantalkcontribs 21:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Muhammad/images (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect - repeated image-blanking by anon IPs.Proabivouac 21:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 21:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Johan Andersen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Austin O'Brien (Yu-Gi-Oh! GX) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Jim Crocodile Cook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Amon Garam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), Martin Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Move-protect to prevent futher moves temporarily, until Mitsumasa can offer substantial evidence of his claims on moving the articles other than the vague explanations given. --Benten 20:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. He's only moved them once, hardly a need for protection. – Steel 23:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Over the Hedge (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi Protect for 2-4 weeks, frequently targetted by User:The UPN Vandal. --Sigma 7 19:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected John Reaves (talk) 20:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Allie DiMeco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. This is my second request. It has been protected before, and vandalism stopped, but immediately following removal of protection, vandalism quickly sprang up again. Requesting semi-protection indefinitely, or at least a month. Signed by Tommy (Talk/Contribs) 19:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected John Reaves (talk) 20:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Teletubbies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Indefinite, if possible. The last ~50 edits, over four days, have been either vandalism or reverts, and this is not a new pattern. Jordan Brown 18:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for 3 weeks. In my opinion, there isn't enough vandalism for indefinite protection. –Llama mantalkcontribs 18:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Stephen Twigg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection. Frequent and repeated deletion of the same paragraph by anonymous IPs. 3 different IPs used so far (in 3 days) but looks like the same person. No explanation given. Requests to cease placed on IP user discussion pages independently by both myself and another WP user. Paragraph concerned is an item about the article subject, backed up with citation from BBC News. --Smerus 17:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined I feel uncomfortable to protect. Although you have tried to contact the user in his talk page, there is not a discussion thread in the talk page. Begin one there, and see if you can contact the user to put his opinion there. However, anyone else can just semiprotect the article to force a discussion if necessary. -- ReyBrujo 18:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    The IP has deleted that section again since the decline [1]. Prior to that I opened a thread on the article talk and notified the IP of the discussion, as suggested by ReyBrujo. It's a dynamic IP, so sprotecting would be very helpful. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I got the timestamp wrong. My bad. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Ramesses II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection High-traffic page for who is perhaps the best-known Egyptian pharaoh after Tutankhamen. A quick survey of the past 50 edits reveals that all but a single exception of anonymous IP contributors either vandalized or experimented on the page. Recent spate of vandalism is making it harder for those who want to maintain the article in good condition. Captmondo 17:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Only two ips vandalized today, none yesterday. I have left warnings in their talk pages, if they do continue, report to WP:AIV and they will be blocked. -- ReyBrujo 17:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Hemşin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection - Users engaging in edit warring. Artaxiad 17:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, article hasn't been edited in 10 days. -- ReyBrujo 17:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Community noticeboard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Recommend Semi Revert warring, possible posting by socks of banned accounts. Navou banter / contribs 17:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, all sockpuppets have been banned already, also the board is frequented by administrators, if abuse continue they will surely protect the board themselves. -- ReyBrujo 17:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    To clarify; one two edits were done by an IP. This is for the recommendation of semi. Navou banter / contribs 17:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand. However, two edits is not enough (for me) to semi protect according to the semi protection policy. However, as any of my decisions here, any other administrator can overwrite it if necessary. -- ReyBrujo 18:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No, your decision is enough for me. The world won't end :P Navou banter / contribs 18:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Tenedos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request for protection against moves because of move warring.--Domitius 16:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Move protected – Steel 17:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    The Great Global Warming Swindle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect High level of sneaky vandalism since current topical and controversial. Vandalised 3 times in last half hour from 2 anonymous IP addresses: 69.50.50.114 and twice by 74.139.61.247. OldDigger 15:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, not enough disruptive activity. – Steel 16:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Twinkle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    semi-protection Semi-protection: High-traffic page, Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalkTodays Pick 14:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Steel 14:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Israel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection +expiry 1 week, Vandilism (mostly IP's) Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalkTodays Pick 14:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Only unprotected a few hours ago. Give it a chance. – Steel 14:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Trance music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect: Long-term persistent vandal repeatedly removing content from the page. Refer to article talk page. Vandal cannot be blocked at WP:AIV due to use of multiple IPs and spacing out of edits (refer to discussions here and here). To be effective, the semi-protection should be placed for a long-term period, expiring in a fortnight or even a month. Kindly do not dismiss this request without reading the mentioned discussions. CounterFX 14:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected interesting discussions, technically this should have be rejected as not enough evidence. A time period has been applied Gnangarra 14:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for taking the time to look into the specifics of the situation. I realise that this should have been a case for WP:AIV, but the admin who tackled the issue there refused to block the vandal, and requesting for semi-protection was the only means of preventing further vandalism. CounterFX 21:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Assistant's Revenge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi protect. There has been repeat vandalism from IP address 74.135.178.229 Circusandmagicfan 23:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Report the guy to WP:AIV. – Steel 23:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Mortal Kombat (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Page was originally protected in order to prevent Anon users adding spam links to the External Links section. The semi-protect solved the problem, but I believe it is time to remove the protect, as not only is the protect disrupting the primary feature of Wikipedia: "An encyclopedia that anyone can edit", but also the page is easily the most viewed Mortal Kombat page - if it remains protected then this could discourage more anon users from contributing. ≈ The Haunted Angel //The Forest Whispers My Name// 00:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:Birth control (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

    Request full unprotection. I think the block was overkill: neither User:Lyrl nor I have ever been disciplined for violating 3RR, and we are currently discussing the content issue civilly on both of our talk pages, as well as on the article talk page (if you scroll all the way to the bottom you can see it). There isn't really a problem here. Please unprotect on good faith from two well-behaved editors. Joie de Vivre 23:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. This was clearly a revert war. What other "useful edits" is this preventing, since the only edits in the past two days were you two reverting each other? Or is this just a Wrong Version complaint? – Steel 23:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:AGF? Did you read our communication to each other? I'm leaving the lab anyway... I just wanted others to not be inconvenienced. Joie de Vivre 23:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Deferred to Llama man (talk · contribs), since he's the protecting admin. – Steel 23:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Stub-Class (edit | [[Talk:Template:Stub-Class|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    I'm not sure why this page is protected - there is some code on the page for some reason...

    Declined. It's transcluded on, apparently, a couple of million pages. – Steel 23:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Neopets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    No vandalism, according to what I've seen. 5Yippee 22:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Un-protected. It's been protected for long enough. Hopefully things have calmed down since then. -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 22:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User:5Yippee (edit | [[Talk:User:5Yippee|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    If I can't edit it, what good is protection, when it's my own page? Just un-protect it for now, and re-semi-protect it when I have an old enough to edit semi-protected pages. 5Yippee 19:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected. Actually, you should not request protection unless your user page is vandalized. -- ReyBrujo 19:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Akon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    I haven't seen any vandalism lately, so it should be un-protected. 5Yippee 19:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected. -- ReyBrujo 19:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Politics of Transnistria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Protected since February 11. No major disagreements since then, please unprotect. - Mauco 19:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected. -- ReyBrujo 19:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    History of Transnistria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Protected since February 11. Issues appear to have been covered extensively in Talk by now. Protection should be lifted at this point in time. - Mauco 19:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected. -- ReyBrujo 19:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Newton's laws of motion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    This has been semi-protected for 2 weeks, despite the relative rarity of vandalism (or edits in general) Kyzer 14:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Not unprotected. I can't see unprotection being all that productive. – Steel 14:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Reza Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    The current protected version is too lopesided. Please incorporate the following segment which is more balanced and was for long time undisputed among the waring editors.

    Reza Shah introduced many socio-economic reforms, reorganizing the army, government administration, and finances. [1] However, his attempts of modernisation reforms have been crticised by some for being "too fast". [2] and "superficial" [3].Under Reza Shah, the social structure continued essentially to be one where a small minority lived off the labors of the rest [4]

    cheers Faranbazu 02:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Please discuss changes on the talk page. – Steel 14:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Eurovision 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    I put a request that page to be protected because someone constantly deletes it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChRis (talk • contribs)

    Declined There is consensus to keep that page, as well as Eurovision Song Contest 2008, deleted until Eurovision 2007 takes place. Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. – Riana shiny disco balls 10:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Neil Armstrong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect high amount of ip vandalism. --KZ Talk • Vandal • Contrib 07:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 09:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:24.13.189.64 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Semiprotect. Removing of vandal templates. Blast 12.05.24 1612 (UTC)

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 09:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Discordian Works (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Requesting unprotection, requested ArbCom case all but rejected - see WP:RFAR - needs to be subject to the editing process again. Moreschi Request a recording? 09:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: 'all but rejected' - but not entirely so. I am personally unwilling to do anything prematurely, but I'll leave the final decision up to an admin with more experience. – riana_dzasta 10:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    World War I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    I don't know why this page is protected, but I'd like to edit it. Amacher 01:11, 17 March 2007

    Un-protected. It's been protected for long enough. Hopefully things have calmed down since then. Majorly (o rly?) 09:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Bill Simmons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    It's been protected for some time, but I don't really see why. No edit warring recently, and there hasn't even been a talk page discussion for a month. It looks like this was protected awhile back but was then forgotten. Stilgar135 22:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Un-protected. It's been protected for long enough. Hopefully things have calmed down since then. Cbrown1023 talk 23:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Bomb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Permanent IP vandalism. Elenthel 05:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 08:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Wiki.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Full Protect - High risk image. If this is the image that's displayed in the top left corner of the site, I think it should be protected to prevent abuse. --AAA! (AAAA) 04:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    It's not used in the corner, just on several user talk pages. I don't think it's really high risk. Majorly (o rly?) 08:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Teacher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Schoolkids messing around again. Semi protect.TNTfan101 04:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 08:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Vanessa Anne Hudgens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Continually bombarded by anon editors. bibliomaniac15 04:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 07:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    JetBlue Airways (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Multiple vandalisms from anon. users after snowstorm canceled flights, including two instances in which users erased the page and wrote their own stories in as the article, time reference 21:39, 14 March 2007-Present. Other instances of vandalism within that time line. Thank you for your help. Neo16287 03:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 07:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    New York Rangers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Heavy vandalism over last few days from rival teams fans as playoff race intensifies. IrisKawling 03:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Majorly (o rly?) 07:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Jethro_Tull_(band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Random IP vandals blanking or nonsense editing. Jaguara 02:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. There hasn't been an edit in the past two days. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 02:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Ultimate Guitar Archive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect. heavy vandalism by a variety of ip addresses. --KZ Talk • Vandal • Contrib 02:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 02:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Latino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Edit wars at Latino article page by same user from "Latin Rap" using multiple IP addies and now using sockpuppets (Dee rock the master and HHFTB) to make completely identical edits to the page, ignoring the talk page. Semi Protection needed to stop sockpuppet edit war. BreadLand 02:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 02:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Columbia_Encyclopedia was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
    2. ^ The Origins of the Iranian Revolution by Roger Homan. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol. 56, No. 4 (Autumn, 1980), pp. 673-677 Link
    3. ^ Richard W. Cottam, Nationalism in Iran, University of Pittsburgh Press, ISBN o-8229-3396-7
    4. ^ N.R. Keddie, Roots of Revolution, Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-02606-4:
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=116138900"