These primes are called "sure" because they are related to strong primes . Strong prime numbers are prime numbers if (in their cryptological definition) both and have “large” prime factors (in the sense of “a prime factor cannot be much larger than half as large as the number itself”). For safe prime numbers , the number has the large prime factor , which is why the safe prime number meets at least one criterion for strong prime numbers.
The duration of methods that factor numbers that have as a prime factor depends in part on the size of the prime factor of , for example in the Pollard p-1 method .
Secure prime numbers also play an important role in cryptology .
Examples
The smallest safe prime numbers are the following:
Zoltán Járai, Gabor Farkas, Timea Csajbok, János Kasza, Antal Járai
5
1855.
November 2, 2009
Zoltán Járai, Gabor Farkas, Timea Csajbok, János Kasza, Antal Járai
6th
1871.
April 1, 2016
S. Urushihata
7th
1885.
September 18, 2009
Tom Wu
8th
1892.
January 25, 2007
David Underbakke
9
1894.
May 3, 2006
Zoltán Járai, Gabor Farkas, Timea Csajbok, János Kasza, Antal Járai
10
1926.
June 14, 2019
Serge Batalov
aStatus: August 13, 2019; the rank only reveals where these prime numbers are in this list
properties
With the exception of the safe prime number , all safe prime numbers are of the form with an integer .
In other words .
Proof:
All numbers of the remainder classes or or are even and therefore divisible by.
The Sophie-Germain prime leads to the secure prime number and this fulfills the condition .
All numbers of the remainder classes or are divisible by.
The Sophie-Germain prime number leads to the secure prime number and this does not meet the condition , but is excluded from this assertion anyway.
There are prime numbers in the remainder class , but because of this one would get secure “prime numbers” that are divisible by and therefore cannot be prime numbers.
The only remaining class of six for certain prime numbers is the remainder of the class .
With the exception of the safe prime number , all safe prime numbers are of the form with an integer .
In other words .
Proof:
With the exception of the first Sophie-Germain prime number (which leads to the secure prime number and for which this assertion is not true) all other prime numbers are odd, i.e. have the form with . Every sure prime number thus has the form of what was to be shown.
With the exception of safe prime numbers and , all safe prime numbers are in the form of an integer .
In other words .
Proof:
All Sophie Germain primes lead to the secure prime numbers and have the form (see proof ). Thus what was to be shown applies to the certain prime number .
Safe prime numbers have the form with . Because of the premise is . But (odd) prime numbers satisfy the congruence or , because all odd numbers of the form are divisible by. Prime numbers of the form cannot be Sophie-Germain prime numbers , because then they would be divisible by and are therefore not secure prime numbers. It just remains, so is or . Thus in both cases . But there is the mathematical theorem that a quadratic residue modulo is exactly when or is. Thus a quadratic remainder is modulo what was to be shown.
The following applies to all safe prime numbers :
shares .
Proof:
Because a quadratic residue modulo is valid following congruence : . It follows directly from this that is is a factor of .
It is . Then the corresponding Sophie Germain prime number is .
In fact is divisor of .
With the exception of the prime number, there are no Fermat prime numbers , which are also secure prime numbers.
Proof:
Fermat primes are of the form . It follows that a power of two, but not a (Sophie-Germain) prime number (except for and thus for ). Thus the Fermat prime number can not be a certain number, which was to be proven.
With the exception of the prime number, there are no Mersenne prime numbers , which are also secure prime numbers.
Proof:
It was shown above that all safe prime numbers except for have the form . Mersenne primes are of the form . So would have to be and therefore would be . but is never divisible by, from which it follows that a Mersenne prime may never be a certain prime number at the same time (with the exception of ).
Every member of a Cunningham chain of the first kind, with the exception of the first member of such a chain, is a sure prime number.
Proof:
The proof lies in the definition of such Cunningham chains: (i.e. a Sophie-Germain prime number), all further members of the sequence have the form and are therefore safe prime numbers according to the definition.
Let be a sure prime number of the form (it should end with ) which occurs in a Cunningham chain. Then:
The number ends the Cunningham chain, so it is the last link in the chain.
Proof:
The next link in this chain would be and would therefore be divisible by and therefore no longer a prime number.