If the i -th denotes the prime number of the sequence, then the smallest prime number can be calculated as greater . To ensure that rounding for n = 1, 2, 3, ... produces a sequence of prime numbers, must also apply. The Hoheisel-Ingham estimate guarantees that there is always a prime between any two sufficiently large cube numbers, which is sufficient to prove this inequality for a sufficiently large first prime number . Since the Riemann hypothesis implies that there is a prime number between any two consecutive cube numbers, the restriction of “sufficiently large” numbers can be dropped, resulting in the smallest Mills prime number of a 1 = 2.
The 11th and largest currently known Mills prime is:
It has 20,562 positions and was discovered by François Morain on June 5, 2006 . However, it was only proven in April 2017 that this number is actually a prime number.
At the moment 3 other Mills prime numbers are known (assuming the Riemann hypothesis). Should the hypothesis not be correct, these three numbers are at least PRP numbers .
The 14th and largest currently known Mills prime (assuming the Riemann hypothesis) is:
It has 555,154 positions.
The number of digits roughly triples for each additional Mills prime number.
The following sequence of numbers (for ) generates these prime numbers using :
Mills' constant can be approximated by calculating the Mills prime numbers as follows:
With this method, Caldwell and Cheng were able to calculate the constant with an accuracy of 6850 decimal places. It is not known whether Mills' constant can be calculated in a closed form, nor is it a rational number . If it is rational and if you know the period of the decimal representation of this rational number, you can generate an infinite number of prime numbers with it (see prime number generator ).
Fractional approximation of Mills' constant
Mills' constant can also be represented approximately by continued fractions . The continued fraction representation of are:
If you choose the first five values of this sequence of numbers, you get:
If you choose the first six values of this sequence of numbers, you get:
If you choose the first seven values of this sequence of numbers, you get:
These continued fractions alternately result in excessively large or too small approximate fractions of . The approximate fractions that can be obtained from the above continued fraction expansion are as follows:
Generalizations
There is no reason why the middle part of the double exponential function above has to be a 3. In fact, L. Kuipers and AR Ansari were able to generalize this finding by showing that:
There is every real number , a constant , so is prime for all positive integers .
You can also replace the rounding function ( ) with the rounding function ( ). The mathematician László Tóth was able to prove the following statement in 2017:
There is every natural number , a constant , so is prime for all positive integers .
↑ Chris K. Caldwell, Yuanyou Cheng: Determining Mills' Constant and a Note on Honaker's Problem . In: Journal of Integer Sequences . Vol. 8, No.4 , 2005 ( full text ).
↑ Steven R. Finch: Mills' Constant . In: Mathematical Constants . Cambridge University Press, 2003, ISBN 0-521-81805-2 , pp.130-133 .