Animal welfare label

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An animal welfare label is a seal of quality that is intended to help consumers of animal products to assess the conditions for keeping, transporting and slaughtering animals.

These labels do not indicate the quality of the meat products.

Definition of "animal welfare"

The term "animal welfare" is neither protected nor legally or scientifically defined under trademark law in Germany. There is a complementary connection between the terms animal welfare and animal welfare .

Animal welfare labels in different countries

Germany

State animal welfare label

A state animal welfare label was already planned under Agriculture Minister Christian Schmidt and continued by his successor Julia Klöckner . In May 2018, a corresponding technical discussion with all those involved took place in the Federal Ministry of Agriculture. The criteria for the new label were presented to the public by the Agriculture Minister in February 2019. For the time being, the introduction is only planned for pig farming, an expansion to other livestock is to follow. The aim is to introduce the state animal welfare label by mid-2020. Participation in the state animal welfare label is to be voluntary, and 100 million euros are planned for advertising. Compliance with the standards should be monitored by state-certified bodies.

The label presented by Klöckner is to contain three levels in the future and a. the following requirements for pigs:

Legal minimum standard step 1 Level 2 level 3
Place in the stable 0.75 m² 0.9 m² 1.1 m² 1.5 m² (of which 0.5 m² outlet)
employment free choice of materials Access to roughage and organic occupational material with options
Suckling time for piglets 21 days 25 days 28 days 35 days
Shorten tails Allowed in individual cases Allowed in individual cases, but stricter requirements forbidden
Anesthesia during castration only from 2021 Yes
Transport time 24 hours 8 h

The state animal welfare label was criticized even before the introduction of animal welfare and consumer protection associations. In particular, it is emphasized that the term "animal welfare" does not conceal a legally binding definition and that most consumers have a different conception of the type of husbandry when animal welfare is advertised. In addition, voluntary participation is not seen as an effective means of significantly improving the keeping of farm animals. In addition, it is suggested for level 1 products that major improvements in animal husbandry have already been achieved compared to the legal standard, but the difference between the legal standard and level 1 is only minimal and is far from sufficient. In addition, the introduction of the state animal welfare label, along with many others, will only bring one more seal of approval onto the market without any further improvement.

In addition to the state animal welfare label, there are various privately organized animal welfare labels in Germany.

Identification of the animal welfare initiative

The label was developed by the Tierwohl initiative , an association of agriculture, the meat industry and the food chains Aldi Nord / Süd, Edeka / Netto, Kaufland / Lidl, Rewe / Penny. You have been awarding packaged own-brand products of pork, beef and chickens with a four-level label from the Society for the Promotion of Animal Welfare in Farm Animal Husbandry since April 2019 . This labeling does not refer to fresh products from the sales counter, and products that do not belong to the own brands are also not labeled. Levels 1 - 4 include a color coding of red-blue-orange-green. Housing type 1 is stable housing, housing type 2 is called stable housing plus, housing type 3 is outside and housing type 4 is premium.

Criteria for the forms of husbandry using the example of pigs
Keeping and exercise Lining Animal health Transport to the slaughterhouse
Housing type 1 (stable housing) <110 kg - 0.75 m 2 / animal

No exercise prescribed.

conventional feed

Genetic engineering allowed

No information on castration,

Truncation of

Curly tails or for

prophylactic administration of

Antibiotics.

No information on

Transport time.

Housing type 2

(Stable housing plus)

<110 kg - 0.825 m 2 / animal

No exercise prescribed.

Additional organic

Employment material.

conventional feed

Genetic engineering allowed

No information on castration,

Truncation of

Curly tails or for

prophylactic administration of

Antibiotics.

No information on

Transport time.

Housing type 3

(Outside climate)

<110 kg - 1.05 m² / animal

No exercise prescribed,

but stable keeping with

Outside climate stimuli.

Additional organic

Employment material.

conventional feed

Genetic engineering prohibited

No information on castration,

Truncation of

Curly tails or for

prophylactic administration of

Antibiotics.

No information on

Transport time.

Housing type 4

(Premium)

<110 kg - 1.5 m 2 / animal

Exercise prescribed.

Additional organic

Employment material.

Conventional feed; at least

20% from own operations

or from the region.

Genetic engineering prohibited.

No information on castration,

Truncation of

Curly tails or for

prophylactic administration of

Antibiotics.

No information on

Transport time.

This way of labeling is criticized by both animal welfare organizations and consumer advocates. In all levels, only the time during the mast is marked. Neither the beak shortening of chickens nor the anesthetized castration or the docking of the tails of pigs is explicitly prohibited in all four stages. The keeping of sows in the crate is also not taken into account. A survey by greenpeace showed that almost 90% of pork comes from farming type 1, so that consumers do not have the right choice between the individual forms. There is no external control of the labeled products and their manufacture.

further markings in Germany

Furthermore, the Neuland label and the animal protection-controlled label of the organization Vier Pfoten exist .

The German Animal Welfare Association has created the animal welfare label for more animal welfare . This is divided into two levels with different strict requirements. The first stage is to ensure, for example, that in pig production the animals are given 45 percent more space compared to the minimum legal requirements. The animals should have their own areas to lie down, eat and defecate. Furthermore, the animals should be offered activity material and there is an upper limit of 3000 pigs per farm. The second stage of the label is to ensure that the animals have twice as much space as the minimum legal requirements and that no more than 2000 animals are kept per farm.

Of natural land , bioland and Demeter are other label featuring products from organic and biodynamic farming.

Denmark

In Denmark there is a state animal welfare label. The consumer is informed of the keeping conditions with green hearts on the products. The state controls the farmers and is responsible for marketing.

Netherlands

In the Netherlands there is the animal welfare label "Beter Leven" (German: live better). According to the agricultural economist Achim Spiller , the label is “extremely successful on the market. If you go through the shelves in Holland you will see it all over the place. That has much larger market shares than in Germany so far. "

Switzerland

There are two types of housing in Switzerland: “BTS” (particularly animal-friendly housing systems) and “RAUS” (housing with regular access to the open air). The Swiss Animal Protection criticized the permitted forms of entertainment there in poultry production. Around 93% of Migros' label poultry comes from Optigal companies that produce according to BTS, which is why Micarna has already been criticized several times. (→ Micarna # review )

United States

There are also Animal Welfare Labels in the USA.

criticism

There is criticism of the animal welfare label from animal welfare organizations, which instead demand the introduction of mandatory husbandry labeling.

See also

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. Wiebke Pirsich, Tierwohl in der Fleischbranche Label - Consumer Settings - Marketing Paths, Dissertation, published on October 18, 2017
  2. Rheinische Post, "Consumers decide about animal welfare" , March 27, 2018
  3. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, The State Animal Welfare Label: Criteria and Requirements , 2017
  4. Progress achieved on the way to a state animal welfare label. ; BMEL press release of May 9, 2018
  5. Klöckner: "We make more animal welfare visible from birth to slaughter." In: Press release No. 36.BMEL, February 6, 2019, accessed on February 6, 2019 .
  6. Questions and answers on the state animal welfare label. Retrieved April 16, 2020 .
  7. https://www.tierwohl-staerken.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Tierwohlkennzeichen/Tierwohlkennzeichen-Kriterien-Tabelle.pdf
  8. 2 August 2019 by Benita Wintermantel Categories: Nutrition: State Animal Welfare Label meets with heavy criticism. August 2, 2019, accessed on April 17, 2020 (German).
  9. Michael Gassmann: Criticism of the state meat label . In: THE WORLD . February 7, 2019 ( welt.de [accessed April 17, 2020]).
  10. gutachten_tierwohl-label. (PDF) Retrieved April 17, 2020 .
  11. https://www.haltungsform.de/
  12. Seal check meat. Retrieved April 16, 2020 .
  13. Posture label: What it can do and whom it should help. Retrieved April 16, 2020 .
  14. i04591_ranking_abfrage_billigfleisch. (PDF) Retrieved April 16, 2020 .
  15. QS Qualität und Sicherheit GmbH: The QS system is the basic benchmark for labeling the manner of husbandry. Accessed April 16, 2020 (German).
  16. NRD, What do the largest animal welfare labels mean? , January 20, 2017
  17. Consumer Advice Center , The Label "For More Animal Welfare" , January 15, 2018
  18. Spiegel, Meat Quality Seal: Wellbeing Label for Conscience , January 28, 2017
  19. Hessischer Rundfunk, Waiting for the State Animal Welfare Label , March 8, 2018
  20. Deutschlandfunk, Not Bio, But More Animal Protection , January 15, 2018
  21. Federal Office for Agriculture : Animal Welfare Contributions (BTS / RAUS) In: blw. admin.ch , accessed on October 8, 2018.
  22. Angelika Hardegger: Is that still agriculture - or is it already industry? In: nzz.ch , September 15, 2018, accessed on February 6, 2019.
  23. ^ New York Times, What to Make of Those Animal-Welfare Labels on Meat and Eggs , January 31, 2017
  24. Retailers want mandatory husbandry labeling , from March 27, 2018, accessed on August 8, 2019 in Lebensmittelpraxis.de.
  25. Honest labeling from schnitzel to milk: FOUR PAWS and consumer advocates are calling for animal husbandry labeling , dated May 3, 2018, accessed on August 8, 2019 in Fellbeisser.net.