Vokil: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Uokils' connections to other peoples are NOT proven. The only thing sure about them is that they were a Bulgar dynasty clan
Undid revision 1197317268 by 73.161.26.158 (talk) sourced
(21 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Uokil''', or '''Vokil''', was a name of [[Bulgar]] [[dynasty|dynastic]] clan listed in the ''[[Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans]]''. The first listed in Nominalia was [[Kormisosh]] (r. 737–754) and the last was [[Umor]] (r. 766).
'''Uokil''', or '''Vokil''', was a name of [[Bulgars|Bulgar]] [[dynasty|dynastic]] clan listed in the ''[[Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans]]''. The first listed in Nominalia was [[Kormisosh]] (r. 737–754) and the last was [[Umor]] (r. 766).


==Theories regarding origins==
==Theories regarding origins==
Line 5: Line 5:
* the ''Hūjiē'' (呼揭) or ''Wūjiē'' (烏揭), whom Zuev believed to have been an offshoot of the [[Yuezhi]] or [[Wusun]];<ref name="Zuev 56"/>
* the ''Hūjiē'' (呼揭) or ''Wūjiē'' (烏揭), whom Zuev believed to have been an offshoot of the [[Yuezhi]] or [[Wusun]];<ref name="Zuev 56"/>
* the ''Xījiē'' (奚結), a [[Tiele people|Tiele]] tribe.<ref>Jiu Tangshu [https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E8%88%8A%E5%94%90%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B7199%E4%B8%8B#%E9%90%B5%E5%8B%92 Vol. 199 lower] txt. "鐵勒,本匈奴別種。自突厥強盛,鐵勒諸郡分散,衆漸寡弱。至武德初,有薛延陀、契苾、回紇、都播、骨利幹、多覽葛、僕骨、拔野古、同羅、渾部、思結、斛薛、'''奚結'''、阿跌、白霫等,散在磧北。" tr. "Tiele are originally Xiongnu's splinter stock. As Tujue are strong and prosperous, all Tiele districts are divided and scattered, the masses gradually dwindled and weakened. At the beginning of Wude [era], there are Xueyantuo, Qibi, Huihe, Dubo, Guligan, Duolange, Pugu, Bayegu, Tongluo, Hun, Sijie, Huxue, '''Xijie''', Adie, Baixi, etc. scattered north of the [[Gobi desert|desert]]."</ref>
* the ''Xījiē'' (奚結), a [[Tiele people|Tiele]] tribe.<ref>Jiu Tangshu [https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E8%88%8A%E5%94%90%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B7199%E4%B8%8B#%E9%90%B5%E5%8B%92 Vol. 199 lower] txt. "鐵勒,本匈奴別種。自突厥強盛,鐵勒諸郡分散,衆漸寡弱。至武德初,有薛延陀、契苾、回紇、都播、骨利幹、多覽葛、僕骨、拔野古、同羅、渾部、思結、斛薛、'''奚結'''、阿跌、白霫等,散在磧北。" tr. "Tiele are originally Xiongnu's splinter stock. As Tujue are strong and prosperous, all Tiele districts are divided and scattered, the masses gradually dwindled and weakened. At the beginning of Wude [era], there are Xueyantuo, Qibi, Huihe, Dubo, Guligan, Duolange, Pugu, Bayegu, Tongluo, Hun, Sijie, Huxue, '''Xijie''', Adie, Baixi, etc. scattered north of the [[Gobi desert|desert]]."</ref>
* the ''Augaloi'' of the [[Transoxiana]] region beyond the [[Amu Darya|Oxus]], among the [[Indo-European languages|Indo-European-speaking]] ''Tocharii'';<ref>Blažek, V. & Schwartz, M. "Tocharians: Who they were, where they came from, and where they lived" in ''Tocharian Studies: Works 1'' (2011), p. 119</ref>
* the ''Augaloi'' of the [[Transoxiana]] region beyond the [[Amu Darya|Oxus]], among the [[Indo-European languages|Indo-European-speaking]] ''[[Tocharians|Tocharii]]'';<ref>Blažek, V. & Schwartz, M. "Tocharians: Who they were, where they came from, and where they lived" in ''Tocharian Studies: Works 1'' (2011), p. 119</ref>
However, such theories are controversial and cannot be all true. Conclusive evidence proving or disproving them has never been presented and there is no consensus amongst scholars on whether or not such links exist.
However, such theories are controversial and cannot be all true. Conclusive evidence proving or disproving them has never been presented and there is no consensus amongst scholars on whether or not such links exist.


Line 12: Line 12:
[[Yuezhi]] and [[Wusun]] are Chinese [[exonym]]s for two separate [[Indo-European languages|Indo-European peoples]], who lived in [[western China]] and [[Central Asia]], during ancient times. Before the end of the 4th Century BCE, the Yuezhi and Wusun were located in areas that were later part of the Chinese provinces of [[Gansu]] and [[Xinjiang]].<ref>G. Haloun, ''"Zur Üe-tsï-Frage. In: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft"'', 91, NF 16, 1937, p. 301, in [[Yury Zuev]], ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 42</ref> There was substantial interaction between the Yuezhi, the Wusun and a neighbouring people, the [[Xiongnu]], whom many scholars have suggested were precursors of the [[Huns]].
[[Yuezhi]] and [[Wusun]] are Chinese [[exonym]]s for two separate [[Indo-European languages|Indo-European peoples]], who lived in [[western China]] and [[Central Asia]], during ancient times. Before the end of the 4th Century BCE, the Yuezhi and Wusun were located in areas that were later part of the Chinese provinces of [[Gansu]] and [[Xinjiang]].<ref>G. Haloun, ''"Zur Üe-tsï-Frage. In: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft"'', 91, NF 16, 1937, p. 301, in [[Yury Zuev]], ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 42</ref> There was substantial interaction between the Yuezhi, the Wusun and a neighbouring people, the [[Xiongnu]], whom many scholars have suggested were precursors of the [[Huns]].


In about 200 BCE, the Xiongnu leader [[Modu Chanyu]] – a vassal of the Yuezhi – rebelled, attacked the Yuezhi,<ref name="Benjamin_Marshak">{{cite journal |last=Benjamin |first=Craig |author-link=Craig Benjamin |date=October 2003 |title=The Yuezhi Migration and Sogdia |url=http://www.transoxiana.org/Eran/Articles/benjamin.html |journal=Transoxiana Webfestschrift |publisher=Transoxiana |volume=1 |issue=Ēran ud Anērān |access-date=29 May 2015}}</ref><ref name="Beckwith380">{{harvnb|Beckwith|2009|pp=380–383}}</ref> and subjugated several other peoples.<ref name="EKH">{{harvnb|Enoki|Koshelenko|Haidary|1994|pp=171–191}}</ref> The Yuezhi subsequently attacked the Wusun, in about 173 BC,<ref name="Benjamin_Marshak"/><ref name="Beckwith6">{{harvnb|Beckwith|2009|pp=6–7}}</ref> and killing their king, Nandoumi ({{zh|難兜靡}}).<ref name="Beckwith6"/> According to a Wusun legend, Nandoumi's infant son Liejiaomi was left in the wild, but was miraculously saved by a she-wolf, which allowed him to suckle, and ravens, which fed him meat.<ref name="FH215">{{harvnb|François|Hulsewé|1979|p=215}}</ref><ref>[http://ctext.org/dictionary.pl?if=en&id=9036 Shiji 《史記·大宛列傳》] '''Original text''': 匈奴攻殺其父,而昆莫生棄於野。烏嗛肉蜚其上,狼往乳之。</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Beckwith|2009|p=6}}</ref><ref name="Watson237">{{harvnb|Watson|1993|pp=237–238}}</ref> This pivotal myth shared similarities with the founding myths of many other peoples in Central Asia.<ref>{{harvnb|Beckwith|2009|p=2}}</ref> It has been, in particular, the basis of theories that the [[Ashina tribe|Ashina]] – the royal clan of the [[Göktürks|Göktürk Turks]] – originated amongst the Wusun.<ref name="Sinor328">{{harvnb|Sinor|Klyashtorny|1996|pp=328–329}}</ref> In 162 BC, the Yuezhi suffered a further, more decisive defeat at the hands of the Xiongnu and retreated from [[Gansu]].<ref name="Benjamin_Marshak"/> According to [[Zhang Qian]], the Yuezhi fragmented and most fled westward into the [[Ili River|Ili]] river valley.<ref name="Benjamin_Marshak"/><ref>[http://ctext.org/dictionary.pl?if=en&id=66451 Hanshu 《漢書·張騫李廣利傳》] '''Original text''' 時,月氏已為匈奴所破,西擊塞王。</ref> The Wusun and Xiongnu later drove the main body of the Yuezhi southward, through [[Sogdia]], into Bactria. The Wusun settled afterwards in Gansu, in the Wushui-he (Chinese: "Raven[-Black] Water River") valley, as vassals of the Xiongnu.<ref name="Beckwith6"/>
In about 200 BCE, the Xiongnu leader [[Modu Chanyu]] attacked the Yuezhi,<ref name="Benjamin_Marshak">{{cite journal |last=Benjamin |first=Craig |author-link=Craig Benjamin |date=October 2003 |title=The Yuezhi Migration and Sogdia |url=http://www.transoxiana.org/Eran/Articles/benjamin.html |journal=Transoxiana Webfestschrift |publisher=Transoxiana |volume=1 |issue=Ēran ud Anērān |access-date=29 May 2015}}</ref><ref name="Beckwith380">{{harvnb|Beckwith|2009|pp=380–383}}</ref> and subjugated several other peoples.<ref name="EKH">{{harvnb|Enoki|Koshelenko|Haidary|1994|pp=171–191}}</ref> The Yuezhi subsequently attacked the Wusun, in about 173 BC,<ref name="Benjamin_Marshak"/><ref name="Beckwith6">{{harvnb|Beckwith|2009|pp=6–7}}</ref> and killing their king, Nandoumi ({{zh|難兜靡}}).<ref name="Beckwith6"/> According to a Wusun legend, Nandoumi's infant son Liejiaomi was left in the wild, but was miraculously saved by a she-wolf, which allowed him to suckle, and ravens, which fed him meat.<ref name="FH215">{{harvnb|François|Hulsewé|1979|p=215}}</ref><ref>[http://ctext.org/dictionary.pl?if=en&id=9036 Shiji 《史記·大宛列傳》] '''Original text''': 匈奴攻殺其父,而昆莫生棄於野。烏嗛肉蜚其上,狼往乳之。</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Beckwith|2009|p=6}}</ref><ref name="Watson237">{{harvnb|Watson|1993|pp=237–238}}</ref> This pivotal myth shared similarities with the founding myths of many other peoples in Central Asia.<ref>{{harvnb|Beckwith|2009|p=2}}</ref> It has been, in particular, the basis of theories that the [[Ashina tribe|Ashina]] – the royal clan of the [[Göktürks|Göktürk Turks]] – originated amongst the Wusun.<ref name="Sinor328">{{harvnb|Sinor|Klyashtorny|1996|pp=328–329}}</ref> In 162 BC, the Yuezhi suffered a further, more decisive defeat at the hands of the Xiongnu and retreated from [[Gansu]].<ref name="Benjamin_Marshak"/> According to [[Zhang Qian]], the Yuezhi fragmented and most fled westward into the [[Ili River|Ili]] river valley.<ref name="Benjamin_Marshak"/><ref>[http://ctext.org/dictionary.pl?if=en&id=66451 Hanshu 《漢書·張騫李廣利傳》] '''Original text''' 時,月氏已為匈奴所破,西擊塞王。</ref> The Wusun and Xiongnu later drove the main body of the Yuezhi southward, through [[Sogdia]], into Bactria. The Wusun settled afterwards in Gansu, in the Wushui-he (Chinese: "Raven[-Black] Water River") valley, as vassals of the Xiongnu.<ref name="Beckwith6"/>


According to the Chinese chronicle ''[[Hanshu]]'', in 49 BCE the Xiongnu ruler, [[Zhizhi Chanyu|Zhizhi]] defeated three small states. Zuev reads the names of these states as the ''Hujie'' (呼揭) or ''Wūjiē'' (烏揭), ''Jiankun'' (堅昆) (i.e. [[Yenisei Kirghiz|Kyrghyz]]) and ''[[Dingling]]'' (丁零). While other scholars have regarded the Hujie ~ Wujie as most likely an offshoot of the Wusun, Zuev considers it possible that they were a remnant of the Yuezhi. The ''Hanshu'' recorded that the '''Hujie'' retreated to the [[Lake Baikal]] area and the [[Great Khingan]] slopes (next to the Dingling).<ref name="Zuev 56">Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 56</ref> According to Zuev, the ''Hujie'' emigrated further westward, initially to the [[Aral Sea]] area, and may have joined the Yuezhi in their migration to Sogdia and Bactria.<ref name="Zuev 56"/>
According to the Chinese chronicle ''[[Hanshu]]'', in 49 BCE the Xiongnu ruler, [[Zhizhi Chanyu|Zhizhi]] defeated three small states. Zuev reads the names of these states as the ''Hujie'' (呼揭) or ''Wūjiē'' (烏揭), ''Jiankun'' (堅昆) (i.e. [[Yenisei Kirghiz|Kyrghyz]]) and ''[[Dingling]]'' (丁零). While other scholars have regarded the Hujie ~ Wujie as most likely an offshoot of the Wusun, Zuev considers it possible that they were a remnant of the Yuezhi. The ''Hanshu'' recorded that the '''Hujie'' retreated to the [[Lake Baikal]] area and the [[Great Khingan]] slopes (next to the Dingling).<ref name="Zuev 56">Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 56</ref> According to Zuev, the ''Hujie'' emigrated further westward, initially to the [[Aral Sea]] area, and may have joined the Yuezhi in their migration to Sogdia and Bactria.<ref name="Zuev 56"/>


===Augaloi===
===Augaloi===
In the 2nd century CE, [[Ptolemy]] (VI, 12, 4) wrote of the Lower [[Syr-Darya]] that near a northern section of the [[Amu Darya]] were the [[Iatioi]] and ''[[Bactria#Daxia.2C_Tukhara_.26_Tokharistan|Tokharoi]]'' (Tukharas, i.e. Bactrians), and south of them were a people known as the ''Augaloi''.
In the 2nd century CE, [[Ptolemy]] (VI, 12, 4) wrote of the Lower [[Syr-Darya]] that near a northern section of the [[Amu Darya]] were the [[Iatioi]] and ''[[Bactria#Daxia, Tukhara and Tokharistan|Tokharoi]]'' (Tukharas, i.e. Bactrians), and south of them were a people known as the ''Augaloi''.


Yury Zuev postulated that the ''Augaloi'' mentioned by Ptolemy with the Ukil.<ref>Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 55</ref> However, a majority of scholars regard ''Augaloi'' as a misrendering of [[Sacaraucae]].
Yury Zuev postulated that the ''Augaloi'' mentioned by Ptolemy with the Ukil.<ref>Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 55</ref> However, a majority of scholars regard ''Augaloi'' as a misrendering of [[Sacaraucae]].
Line 26: Line 26:
The text of an [[Old Uyghur]] funeral monument for [[Bayanchur Khan|Eletmish-Kagan]] (d. 759), referred to the ''Qara Igil bodun'': a combination of the determinative ''qara'' ("blackness") and ''igil'' ("people").<ref>Mogoin Shine Usu monument, line 14</ref> (This name may also have suggested the influence of [[Manichaeanism]], which had a [[Black-and-white dualism|"black and white" dualistic]] cosmology.<ref>Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 45</ref>)
The text of an [[Old Uyghur]] funeral monument for [[Bayanchur Khan|Eletmish-Kagan]] (d. 759), referred to the ''Qara Igil bodun'': a combination of the determinative ''qara'' ("blackness") and ''igil'' ("people").<ref>Mogoin Shine Usu monument, line 14</ref> (This name may also have suggested the influence of [[Manichaeanism]], which had a [[Black-and-white dualism|"black and white" dualistic]] cosmology.<ref>Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 45</ref>)


In a 9th-century [[Yugur]] text, the ''Xijie'' were mentioned as having a strong leader named Igil kül-irkin ([[Old Tibetan]] ''Hi-kil-rkor-hir-kin''), and were located next to the ''Iduq-kas'', ''Iduq-qash'', or ''Iduk-[[Az (people)|Az]]'' ([[Old Tibetan|OTib]] ''Hi-dog-kas'') , who may have been offshoot or successor of the Yuezhi or [[Alans#Name|Alans]]<ref>J. Bacot, ''"Reconnaissance en haute asie septentrionale par cinq envoyé ouigours au VIIIE siècle."'', JA, 2, 1956, p. 147, in Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 45</ref> or Turkicized [[Yeniseian languages|Yeniseian]] speakers.<ref>Barthold, W. ''12 Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Türken Mittelasiens'', Berlin, Arthur Collignon, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Islamkunde, 1935, p. 37</ref>
In a 9th-century [[Yugur]] text, the ''Xijie'' were mentioned as having a strong leader named Igil kül-irkin ([[Old Tibetan]] ''Hi-kil-rkor-hir-kin''), and were located next to the ''Iduq-kas'', ''Iduq-qash'', or ''Iduk-[[Az (people)|Az]]'' ([[Old Tibetan|OTib]] ''Hi-dog-kas''), who may have been offshoot or successor of the Yuezhi or [[Alans#Name|Alans]]<ref>J. Bacot, ''"Reconnaissance en haute asie septentrionale par cinq envoyé ouigours au VIIIE siècle."'', JA, 2, 1956, p. 147, in Yu. Zuev, ''"Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology"'', p. 45</ref> or Turkicized [[Yeniseian languages|Yeniseian]] speakers.<ref>Barthold, W. ''12 Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Türken Mittelasiens'', Berlin, Arthur Collignon, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Islamkunde, 1935, p. 37</ref>


=== Oghuz connection ===
=== Oghuz connection ===

Revision as of 10:44, 20 January 2024

Uokil, or Vokil, was a name of Bulgar dynastic clan listed in the Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans. The first listed in Nominalia was Kormisosh (r. 737–754) and the last was Umor (r. 766).

Theories regarding origins

Kazakh Turkologist Yury Zuev had drawn attention to circumstantial evidence suggesting links between the Vokil and various Central Asian peoples, during antiquity and the early Middle Ages. The peoples concerned include:

However, such theories are controversial and cannot be all true. Conclusive evidence proving or disproving them has never been presented and there is no consensus amongst scholars on whether or not such links exist.

Yuezhi and Wusun

Yuezhi and Wusun are Chinese exonyms for two separate Indo-European peoples, who lived in western China and Central Asia, during ancient times. Before the end of the 4th Century BCE, the Yuezhi and Wusun were located in areas that were later part of the Chinese provinces of Gansu and Xinjiang.[4] There was substantial interaction between the Yuezhi, the Wusun and a neighbouring people, the Xiongnu, whom many scholars have suggested were precursors of the Huns.

In about 200 BCE, the Xiongnu leader Modu Chanyu attacked the Yuezhi,[5][6] and subjugated several other peoples.[7] The Yuezhi subsequently attacked the Wusun, in about 173 BC,[5][8] and killing their king, Nandoumi (Chinese: 難兜靡).[8] According to a Wusun legend, Nandoumi's infant son Liejiaomi was left in the wild, but was miraculously saved by a she-wolf, which allowed him to suckle, and ravens, which fed him meat.[9][10][11][12] This pivotal myth shared similarities with the founding myths of many other peoples in Central Asia.[13] It has been, in particular, the basis of theories that the Ashina – the royal clan of the Göktürk Turks – originated amongst the Wusun.[14] In 162 BC, the Yuezhi suffered a further, more decisive defeat at the hands of the Xiongnu and retreated from Gansu.[5] According to Zhang Qian, the Yuezhi fragmented and most fled westward into the Ili river valley.[5][15] The Wusun and Xiongnu later drove the main body of the Yuezhi southward, through Sogdia, into Bactria. The Wusun settled afterwards in Gansu, in the Wushui-he (Chinese: "Raven[-Black] Water River") valley, as vassals of the Xiongnu.[8]

According to the Chinese chronicle Hanshu, in 49 BCE the Xiongnu ruler, Zhizhi defeated three small states. Zuev reads the names of these states as the Hujie (呼揭) or Wūjiē (烏揭), Jiankun (堅昆) (i.e. Kyrghyz) and Dingling (丁零). While other scholars have regarded the Hujie ~ Wujie as most likely an offshoot of the Wusun, Zuev considers it possible that they were a remnant of the Yuezhi. The Hanshu recorded that the 'Hujie retreated to the Lake Baikal area and the Great Khingan slopes (next to the Dingling).[1] According to Zuev, the Hujie emigrated further westward, initially to the Aral Sea area, and may have joined the Yuezhi in their migration to Sogdia and Bactria.[1]

Augaloi

In the 2nd century CE, Ptolemy (VI, 12, 4) wrote of the Lower Syr-Darya that near a northern section of the Amu Darya were the Iatioi and Tokharoi (Tukharas, i.e. Bactrians), and south of them were a people known as the Augaloi.

Yury Zuev postulated that the Augaloi mentioned by Ptolemy with the Ukil.[16] However, a majority of scholars regard Augaloi as a misrendering of Sacaraucae.

Xijie

This name may be a sinicisation of igil, a Turkic root meaning "many" (Xijie < 奚結 γiei-kiet < igil). In the middle of the 7th century, the Xijie were reported to be located on the northern bank of the Kherlen River.[17][18]

The text of an Old Uyghur funeral monument for Eletmish-Kagan (d. 759), referred to the Qara Igil bodun: a combination of the determinative qara ("blackness") and igil ("people").[19] (This name may also have suggested the influence of Manichaeanism, which had a "black and white" dualistic cosmology.[20])

In a 9th-century Yugur text, the Xijie were mentioned as having a strong leader named Igil kül-irkin (Old Tibetan Hi-kil-rkor-hir-kin), and were located next to the Iduq-kas, Iduq-qash, or Iduk-Az (OTib Hi-dog-kas), who may have been offshoot or successor of the Yuezhi or Alans[21] or Turkicized Yeniseian speakers.[22]

Oghuz connection

A circumstantial link between the Oghuz and the Bulgar Vokil is the naming of Verkil, a hero of the epic Kitab-i dedem Korkut.[23]

References

  1. ^ a b c Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology", p. 56
  2. ^ Jiu Tangshu Vol. 199 lower txt. "鐵勒,本匈奴別種。自突厥強盛,鐵勒諸郡分散,衆漸寡弱。至武德初,有薛延陀、契苾、回紇、都播、骨利幹、多覽葛、僕骨、拔野古、同羅、渾部、思結、斛薛、奚結、阿跌、白霫等,散在磧北。" tr. "Tiele are originally Xiongnu's splinter stock. As Tujue are strong and prosperous, all Tiele districts are divided and scattered, the masses gradually dwindled and weakened. At the beginning of Wude [era], there are Xueyantuo, Qibi, Huihe, Dubo, Guligan, Duolange, Pugu, Bayegu, Tongluo, Hun, Sijie, Huxue, Xijie, Adie, Baixi, etc. scattered north of the desert."
  3. ^ Blažek, V. & Schwartz, M. "Tocharians: Who they were, where they came from, and where they lived" in Tocharian Studies: Works 1 (2011), p. 119
  4. ^ G. Haloun, "Zur Üe-tsï-Frage. In: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft", 91, NF 16, 1937, p. 301, in Yury Zuev, "Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology", p. 42
  5. ^ a b c d Benjamin, Craig (October 2003). "The Yuezhi Migration and Sogdia". Transoxiana Webfestschrift. 1 (Ēran ud Anērān). Transoxiana. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  6. ^ Beckwith 2009, pp. 380–383
  7. ^ Enoki, Koshelenko & Haidary 1994, pp. 171–191
  8. ^ a b c Beckwith 2009, pp. 6–7
  9. ^ François & Hulsewé 1979, p. 215
  10. ^ Shiji 《史記·大宛列傳》 Original text: 匈奴攻殺其父,而昆莫生棄於野。烏嗛肉蜚其上,狼往乳之。
  11. ^ Beckwith 2009, p. 6
  12. ^ Watson 1993, pp. 237–238
  13. ^ Beckwith 2009, p. 2
  14. ^ Sinor & Klyashtorny 1996, pp. 328–329
  15. ^ Hanshu 《漢書·張騫李廣利傳》 Original text 時,月氏已為匈奴所破,西擊塞王。
  16. ^ Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology", p. 55
  17. ^ Tang Huiyao Vol. 72 txt. "奚結馬。與磧南突厥馬相類。在雞服山南。赫連枝川北住。今雞祿州。印坎" tr. "The Xijie's horses and the horses of the Tujue south of the shoal. They dwelt south of Jifu mountains, north of Helianzhi river, now [in] Jilu pronvince. Their tamga [resembles] [the character] 坎"
  18. ^ Wang Pu, "Summary review of Tang dynasty, 618-907 (Tang Huiyao)", Shanghai, 1958, ch. 72, p. 1307, in Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology", p. 45
  19. ^ Mogoin Shine Usu monument, line 14
  20. ^ Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology", p. 45
  21. ^ J. Bacot, "Reconnaissance en haute asie septentrionale par cinq envoyé ouigours au VIIIE siècle.", JA, 2, 1956, p. 147, in Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology", p. 45
  22. ^ Barthold, W. 12 Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Türken Mittelasiens, Berlin, Arthur Collignon, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Islamkunde, 1935, p. 37
  23. ^ Yu. Zuev, "Early Türks: Sketches of history and ideology", p. 57

Sources

See also