User talk:Giggy

FACs needing feedback view •
Mission: Impossible – Fallout	Review it now
Blackrocks Brewery	Review it now

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Where can I begin? From the earliest time I can remember, you've been helping me out and being the epitome of a "Wiki-Friend". I think the first time we met was on Talk:Saxophone, where I was having some trouble with my first GA review; you came in with the second opinion. Since then, you nominated me for adminship (when yours comes along, provided I'm not out of the country for the Northern Hemisphere summer, I'll co-nom), reviewed three/four of my articles at GAN, contributed at the GAN, PR, and FAC for Gilberto Gil, my first FA attempt (which sadly didn't pass, tear...), and answered enumerable questions plus did some not-so-serious things. You certainly deserve this. Kakofonous (talk) 22:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

And, oh yeah, cê is done, I think. --Kakofonous (talk) 22:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh wow. That's awesome. I'm uberly humbled. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

And Daara J. P.S.: WP:200 already? That's just unreal... --Kakofonous (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

A bit, yeah. Looking at DJ now. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Adminship

I mean this in the best possible way - are you sure you want to be an admin? In my opinion you're an excellent contributor. Once adminship settles in much of your time may be diverted away from editing and towards blocking people and arguing with trolls, not fun at all. If you feel you've already given much/the majority of your expertise to wikipedia then this might be a natural evolution, but by the looks of it you still have plenty of input to give.

Also, (and i want to say this in the most unpatronising way), I notice from your user page that you're still quite young. Remember there is much to achieve in life outside of wikipedia. You may find adminship takes up even more of your time. Is this what you really want? And you seem like a pretty bright person: are you applying yourself as well to other things? For the record i'm also one of the younger wikipedians here.

Wikipedia is a noble project and i appreciate your contributions and enthusiasm. Maybe this is quite a heavy response to a nomination for admin: but make sure you make the most of yourself and the time you have.

Ps. It was neither my intention to patronise nor anger you, only to make you think a little. Cheers. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 15:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You know H2O's a 'crat on commons already, right? — iridescent 15:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

It appears it's already too late then. ahh!!! Sillyfolkboy (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Sillyfolkboy, I do understand what you're saying. Something it (partially) comes down to is "are you sure you want to be an admin" - to be perfectly honest, I don't care. Worst comes to worse, I can keep contributing to the mainspace, but if I do pass, I can help out in other areas too. It's not a big deal, I just think I can help the project and the community a bit more. If they don't want me to help in that way, that's cool too. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair play. You know some people go troll hunting after adminship and it always ends in tears. I'm glad you're not one of them. Keep up the good mainspace contributions. Good luck with the RFA, though short of divine intervention i don't think luck will be a factor! Unofficial support: don't feel offended by my missing signature. Take care. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. I can't promise to predict how the future will turn out, but I've got no intentions of being SockHunter Waterman for now, at least. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:100 Malinaccier P. (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: RFA

I mentioned this in your RFA but want to mention it again - I had seriously been considering asking if you were interested in another go at the mop, recently. Best of luck this time around, although it looks like you're well on the way to joining the rest of us janitors ... Arkyan 16:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank your for your comments, you weren't the first to suggest I run. :)

Facebook FAC

Just noting that it has now been 10 days since I last posted my sourcing objections, and the nominator has yet to address a single issue. He's certainly been active on Wikipedia, so it doesn't look like time constraints is the issue here. In my opinion, the sourcing issues I raised would mar the article from meeting even GA standards, as a large chunk of the article's beginning (the part I checked in-depth) misrepresents the contents of the references. BuddingJournalist 17:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I've commented again. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Feedback (song)

Hi, H20, good luck on your RfA, i voted to support you. A few weeks ago, you quick failed the above song i nominated for GA. Admittedly it was a little slack on depth. Since then ive expanded the lead and the "music video" section. Im not really sure what else to add, would you mind taking a look at it and giving a few suggestions before i renominate it. On the talk page you did link me to an article to find inspiration but that was an FA article. I have no intention of getting "Feedback" to FA - ever. I always find singles hard, albums and artists are so much easier. I look forward to your thoughts, cheers. --Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 19:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. :) If I have the time I'll try to take another look some time soon. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, i look forward, Admin H20, ;-) --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 03:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

BRC & privacy concerns

Hey Gigz, would you mind dropping in your opinion here? Thanks. GlassCobra 01:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Commented. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

E-mail.

Sent you one. · AndonicO ^Engage. 01:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I've read and replied. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Images

Hey Water, Could you do me a favor. I'm working with a coachee who has a history of having images deleted. His last few images have not been deleted, but he had about 20 deleted in November. Images are not an area where I am strong, could you come over to his coaching page and give us BOTH a tutorial on images? I figure that if you are a crat on Commons this should be easy for yaBalloonman (talk) 05:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh God, that page is really long. If you only want image-related comments, could you set up another page (User:Happyme22/image coaching?) so I don't have to navigate that every time, please. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: RfA

I'm not sure there's anything that would change my mind in particular, I mean, I've seen your edits and I've seen you around elsewhere and almost everything i've seen is good. However, if a point has been raised about racist comments (i'm not sure about how substantial these claims are, but I trust OrangeMarlin just as much as I trust your opinion) then I have to take it into account, IMHO. If you could point out which incidents he is referring to then I may be able to further make up my mind.

That said, the incidents were supposedly 'off-wiki' and I may switch to support for that reason. To be honest, as you may be able to tell, i'm really unsure, thus the neutrality. Regards, CycloneNimrod^Talk? 09:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I believe he is referring to this blog post I made (as have some others in the RfA). I don't consider myself racist, and I disagree with his interpretation of the situation, but it's an opinion he's entitled to. I don't want to put words in his mouth, but from reading his oppose I take it this is why he's made it (as well as his other comments on the RfA page, obviously). dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, now had I seen that before I would have continued to support! There is nothing there that indicates you won't make a good administrator and there's nothing that implies you are racist, either. I'll strike my vote and switch to support. Regards, CycloneNimrod^Talk? 10:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, it is appreciated. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for sorting out the bot approval - now for several months' hard labour! Fritzpoll (talk) 11:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

That bot is so cool! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 11:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but so short-lived. It will be redundant after a mere 2million edits (sigh) ;) Fritzpoll (talk) 11:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

My Qs

Thanks for the note. I'm really struggling with this. I'm going to ponder it for a few days and see if I can completely forget to come back to it in time. Assuming that I don't (completely forget), I'll possibly pop back. Maybe. Oh. Does that sound wishwashy? Oh gosh, is that the time? --Dweller (talk) 13:35, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I think that makes sense. :) Cheers mate. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 13:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Matthew's questions

Check your last answer - you've identified when it is appropriate, but the question is about when it is inappropriate to ban. Risker (talk) 14:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Oops.... misreading. Going to fix now. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 14:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Just a quick note to let you know that I elaborated a bit at your RfA on my comment there. I also wanted to say, given recent events, that I haven't had any on- or off-wiki contact with anyone regarding anything related to you or your RfA. It's sad to feel the need to say that. Canvassing people to oppose an RfA is just wrong, and I'm sorry that you're having to deal with it in yours. Anyhow, my opinion is just... my opinion; your RfA looks likely to succeed, so take it for whatever you believe it to be worth. Best of luck. MastCell ^Talk 16:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks MastCell, appreciate the ping. The investigation into the canvassing is ongoing, I believe, but you say you weren't told and I believe you. We'll see what happens. I'll take your comments on board. Thanks and cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Dear God

There's still five days left. You holding up alrighty? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to add WOW!!!. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

RE The title: YES?Balloonman (talk) 19:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The FA-Team

Hi. There has been some discussion of how to improve the FA-Team's functioning. It's be grand if you could comment on the new suggested structure, and perhaps also look at our current proposals. Thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 18:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I need to keep better tabs on that. Will look. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Getting people to notice

Hey there Water,

I did want to let you know that you are allowed to use {{Rfa-notice}} to announce your RfA to people... I mean, I'm starting to wonder if anybody knows that you are running.Balloonman (talk) 19:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

With 241+ comments, my guess is yes, people do know. Al Tally ^talk 19:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I thought the touch of sarcasm would be obvious... Balloonman (talk) 20:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Guess the humour part of my brain is switched off tonight. Hmm.Al Tally ^talk 20:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Not to mention I'm using that on my userpage as it is! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Smirk!

Go Giggy!

Acalamari 23:24, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Lisa the Beauty Queen

I've left some comments at the article's subpage. Limetolime ^{talk to me • look what I did!} 00:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Oops, you're right. I think you forgot to do this though. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 00:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Albambot

User:Albamhandae asked me to unblock Albambot based on Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Albambot 3. How much did you investigate this bot? Gimmetrow 03:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I did investigate; all seemed good and trial-worthy from where I stood. Have I missed something? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

What about the two previous BRFAs, including the denial a couple weeks ago? Gimmetrow 20:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Good afternoon, sir.

Well, it's the afternoon SOMEWHERE. (In Japan, I believe). Anyways, does my support of your RFA mean less to you because it was solely because I have a strong distaste for your opposition? Sincerely, MessedRocker (talk) 03:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I really don't know what to make of it! (And yes, it's afternoon in Aus.) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello Alex! I supported you! I hope your RfA will pass.

Alex, I wanted to contact you about a month ago. I know about your contributions. I saw your name when I was new. And, about a month ago, I wanted to contact you. The only problem was...your user name is difficult to remember! "Dihydrogen Monoxide"! Now, I will remember it! Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Giggy makes for a quick, easy, and oft-cited redirect. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh! Thank you for the reply. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The newz

Newsletter is almost done. It has a Nick Cave quote and everything. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Word. I'll probably send it out tomorrow unless you get it done in like, the next five minutes. Need my beauty sleep so one day I can get a Nick Cave mo. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 11:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, it's ready for when you wake up! WesleyDodds (talk) 12:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

HBLL GA Review

Thank you very much for your review. I believe all issues have been addressed and the article is ready for your final review. Thank you! --Eustress (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Dodgy image

I think someone said you're on commons - surely this can't qualify for GNU release. It's derived from this or similar. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 18:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, you cannot declare a worked derived from a copyrighted work GNU even if you modify it, only the copyright owner can. _{1 != 2} 19:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

You're both right, and it's gone. (I thought for a moment I had uploaded it or something and that's why you were here... gah, I didn't need that stress! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Dictionary

You don't seem to have stumbled across WP:WIKISPEAK yet. I don't know why, but I have a suspicion you may have a few offerings for it. — iridescent 19:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Trust me, I'm highly familiar with that page. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Jan Willem Spruyt

Hi, I addressed all the issues you brought forward in the article on Jan Willem Spruyt. Have a look. Michel Doortmont (talk) 22:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Awesome, I'll take a look. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Email

See your inbox. --Kakofonous (talk) 02:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Sighed and replied. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

My Apologies

I blew it... I shouldn't have nom'd ya... but I didn't want to stand in your way. Ultimately, I think you will be a great admin. I just felt that you should wait.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 03:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Stay strong my friend

I cant imagine how you feel, you deserve better than this Bull sh*t. --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 03:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I dunno, maybe I do. But thank you. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Indeed don't let this get you down. Al Tally ^talk 03:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

You will be an admin, despite this... thing. I voted in support because the community needs you, I stand by that more than ever after seeing your controlled reaction. --— Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 03:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

		The Resilient Barnstar
		For keeping on keeping on, despite the problems that seem to keep coming your way, I, Al Tally award Dihydrogen Monoxide The Resilient Barnstar. Al Tally talk 03:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

HBLL

Looks like we've got everything! Wrad (talk) 03:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Yay! I'll take a look. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

No Problem

Keep showing your class while making your detractors look foolish. I would recommend that when someone attempts to recall you (and it's happened to me twice, so far, so don't think it can't happen) that you appoint a Neutral Clerk to determine the validity of the recall attempt (You've said that it's only based on your administrative actions, so if they continue down this road of smears, and try to recall you, a clerk can judge the validity of the whole thing. SirFozzie (talk) 04:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I've noted there that it will def. be someone neutral. I think my RfA's neutral section has plenty of available names! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 04:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

*Sigh* Hang in there

Qb | ^{your 2 cents} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Dee Luong query

May I ask why you concurred with Traynor? I am having a hard time finding what is so swaying in his argument. –– Lid^(Talk) 06:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for getting me to take another look; I just realised I had missed something, and struck my comment. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

5th??

		Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience
		The 5th time? Really? For that, I must give you this: The Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience goes to Dihydrogen Monoxide as an editor who has shown extraordinary patience. Doczilla STOMP! 06:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Doczilla _STOMP! 06:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Heh, thanks. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 14 - May 2008

"I go to a fucking office and I write. I'm not one of these dickheads who opens a beer, high fives his mates and opens his mouth and shit pours out, which he then writes on a beer mat. It doesn't come easy."- Nick Cave Project news "Touch Me I'm Sick", Diorama (album) and Nine Inch Nails live performances reached featured article status in the past month! Well done to Indopug, Dihydrogen Monoxide, and Drewcifer3000. The discographies of Sonic Youth, The Libertines, Foo Fighters and Smoking Popes reached featured list status during the past month. Well done to Drewcifer3000, Indopug, Tenacious D Fan and Teemu08. We collaborated on Superunknown, Supergrass, Kate Bush and Foo Fighters during the past month. During the month of May, The Killers, "Under the Bridge", Death Cab for Cutie, Bloc Party, Coldplay, Beck and Ten (Pearl Jam album) were promoted to good article status. This month's "Recommended Alternative Album" is Cocteau Twins - Treasure (1984).

New members Seraphim Whipp, Guitardude3600, Lunar Jesters, Kristmace, Freedom (song), TwentiethApril1986, JD554, Thom, and Sethward joined the alternative music fold during May. Editors User:WesleyDodds

You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Mark Twain

Was it him who said his obituaries preceded him? I insist on privacy and you wont find anything on wikispace for a while - so get a job or something :) SatuSuro 08:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

This is why I can't wait. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Watching all your washing in public dosnt exactly inspire any sense of going for it in any way at all :| SatuSuro 09:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

As for below ↓ the old chestnut of quantity vs quality comes to mind - it fits with Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/FritzpollBot creating millions of new articles - millions of stubs aint gonna make the place any better :( - but I am sure you can - if you get there SatuSuro 11:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... I'm curious as to what the community thinks. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Congrats, you're officially a record breaker. :) Highest number of supports in an RfA so far! :D PeterSymonds (talk) 09:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Woah! Good job. Rudget (Help?) 11:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Nice. ;-) CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 12:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Wow. I'd much prefer Phaedriel returning to this... dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Meetup

DHMO, you said you were interested in having a meetup sometime soon... I went to create a page but this was still there. Are you still up for it? Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC).

Yeah, I'm gonna get to that in a few days if E doesn't beat me. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Holy shit!

You actually beat Phaedriel's 2-year RFA support record! bibliomaniac15 19:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree totally with that =P Well done! WP:300 not impossible... weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 22:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I just wanted to leave a note of encouragement - your RfA has been unnecessarily controversial and stressful, especially with the recent drama involving Balloonman. I hope you do well. Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 22:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Wow. I'd much prefer Phaedriel returning to this... dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:GAN for History of Vid. Games 7th gen

I've fixed those refs. Further explanation on talk page. Thanks! --haha169 (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC

Awesome, on ma way. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

OK, I admit it...

...My prediction was ever so slightly wrong. Remind me never to go into fortune-telling. — iridescent 22:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

You were close, give or take ~600% Hehe <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 23:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Irid, do you have any idea who much I'd prefer the count you predicted? :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

My summary of your RFA so far

I took the time to read pretty much all the whole thing as i'm sure you have. Just thought i'd give you my perspective on it:

• Firstly, I changed my "cool-guy-unofficial-support" to a real one. Secondly, you should see the oppose section of your RFA as an editor review of sorts. Having your flaws pointed out to you in public will surely irk you but also it can be a path to self improvement.
• The major oppose reason seems to be lack of maturity; run with that and ensure you're never too hasty, calling on other admins' opinions when controversy looms.
• The second big point seems to be lack of trust: trust is easily lost and hard to regain. I'm sure some people would still oppose per the GA thing if you'd applied in five years time. I think you've improved from this mistake but, at the risk of sounding unpopular, I'm sure there are some articles without FA or GA status that actually are better than some of their badged friends. Remember: the most important thing is that an article is improved, even if it fails a review.
• You are seen as keen for adminship. An adequate concession to this would be not to go tool crazy if you pass the RFA; avoiding blocking/unblocking where possible as this seems to be a key worry.
• Complaints of you over stating your achievements: whilst you should be proud of your work - try to let it speak for itself. (I will say however that these facts are bound to come up in RFAs and i've never seen you say "hi, I'm Dihydrogen '10 FA' Monoxide")
• Some seem to react badly to your sarcasm and humour. Be aware some people just will not like this or will see it as inappropriate, especially coming from a proposed admin. This does not mean there is no place for it :)
• Ignore the "white pride" furore, this is just an inflammatory topic and regardless of your original intentions the mere mention of this will cause friction. Similarly, stay away from "Armenian Genocide", "Intelligent Design", "Palestine", "Paedophilia" and any other topic that brings a heated crowd wherever it goes.

I hope my obvious, inane observations are of some interest to you. Otherwise: unlucky you. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

First of all, thank you for the support. Secondly, you're right, and I've been trying to look at it like that, without getting too hung up on it. It's only the internet. Thanks for the other comments, I think I agree with most, if not all, of them. I've probably got a lot of comments and critique to respond to, but I'd rather wait until after the RfA. I need a bit of time to reflect on it without having to watch for updates at the same time.

Anyway, thanks. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Well done

On your exemplary behaviour and responses to the drama exploding on your RfA. Good luck with whatever comes next, and the inevitable scrutiny on the actions you take for the next six months, whether admin or not! --Stephen 00:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. It's been a tough few days. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

My support

If you don't get it, nobody should. All the best to the editor with an extremely nice, and totally individual style, when dealing with very difficult subjects. You have my total support. :)--andreasegde (talk) 01:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)