Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anachronist (talk | contribs) at 02:25, 24 October 2007 (→‎Current requests for protection: Tiny). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit


    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Tiny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect. Just about every other edit since last May includes vandalism from an AOL user (172.xxx.xxx.xxx) fixated on "Justin's pecker" or some variation of that. Article has been semi-protected in the past. Unfortunately, AOL users can't be blocked because AOL issues new IP addresses on every new HTTP request. The only anonymous edits to this article have been vandalism from one AOL user who switches IPs too fast to block, the article should have a long-term semi-protection. -Amatulic 02:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Everything (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect (disambiguation page) I'm trying this again. IP vandalism has been high for some time. Thanks-BlueAmethyst .:*:. 01:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — madman bum and angel 02:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Carolyn McCarthy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary full protection Vandalism, Lots of vandalism on this page today..—Noah 01:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked.. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Christopher Columbus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection - Lots of IP vandalism. I should not be having potential 3RR issues on a page I am not watching --Rumping 01:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The three-revert rule does not apply to reversion of blatant, simple vandalism. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Feminism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection - Lots of IP vandalism.   jj137 (Talk) 00:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 25 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--JForget 00:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Tornado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Vandalism, Lots of anon vandalism and test edits..--Hdt83 Chat 00:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 7 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--JForget 00:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    FLIR Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism the last three days from same person, but now that they were blocked switched to a different IP. Aboutmovies 00:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Angel David (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    And the rest of my userspace. Fully-Protected. Except for my talk page. I’m not allowed to edit the rst of my usrspace or my userpage. So except for my talk page protect until December 24. This is for many reasons since I’m not an admin. But it’s all up to you guys /\_/\--Angel David 00:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Protection isn't meant to save you from yourself, but please hit me up if vandalism becomes an issue. the_undertow talk 01:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:24.164.136.207 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite full protection User talk of banned user, Talk page of a known vandal who claims I'm his friend and he's coming back. I do not think he needs the use of his talk page..Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 00:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    He's basically only using the page as a way to express his vandalous ways. I think he's having way too much fun being blocked and I also think the only thing that he can accomplish with his talk page is annoying people. He's already blocked for a year, just protect his talk page for a year. Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 01:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please just ignore it. -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Big Bang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect for a month. IP users seem to like vandalising this page a lot. This page was protected for a few weeks (until Oct. 15th), but still, the vandalism persists.-BlueAmethyst .:*:. 00:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 5 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--JForget 00:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Greenhouse effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect - Suprisingly high levels of vandalism recently from unregistered IPs. TheIslander 00:07, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--JForget 00:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    InuYasha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protect another onset of heavy vandalism. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected. by User:Maxim--JForget 00:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Dragon Ball Z (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary full protection apparently new users keep re-adding the same original research to the page. I'm about to post an explanation on the talk page describing why I have removed every instance of unsourced content. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Pumpmeup (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, Preemptive measure for new user (I'v egot a new username and last user got hammered with retaliations for reverts/warnings) on vandal patrol - gets annoying.--Pumpmeup 23:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Johnny Vegas‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect IP hopping vandal on a spree at the moment, adding same (unfunny) joke.FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IrishGuy talk 23:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    WWE Cyber Sunday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect Multiple IP's in the last 24 hours are adding speculation about a returning superstar, at the 2007 event in the form of "the savior returns", Me and TJ Spyke have reverted the speculation a couple of times now.--TrUcO9311 22:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Maxim(talk) (contributions) 23:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    WWE Judgment Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect Multiple IPs keep adding unsourced speculation about an event that hasn't even been announced yet. TJ Spyke 21:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    I've given the article a Semi-protected Slam. You've got two months before it ends. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 21:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    University of Kansas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request semi-protection for a short time period. The article has seen a large increase in vandalism by IPs in the last few hours, hopefully they'll get bored soon. Stardust8212 21:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Sengunthar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request for protection as the current version has all relevant references. Users Casper21 , SiddharthRaju , Raghav_NS have been frequent vandals on this article. Now, users User:Casper21 , SiddharthRaju , Raghav_NS have been identified as sockpuppets of the same user user:Mudaliar proven in [1]. These users have been banned now. So to prevent any future vandalism via other new sockpuppets and revert wars, need to protect the article.Saedirof 20:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Come by when socks appear to vandalize the article. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 21:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Titanium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, High level of vandalism. .Carlosguitar 20:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Bristol City F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi protection Lots of vandalism recently by Ips. It was semi protected a few months ago but has come under alot of vandalism recently, mostly renaming Bristol City "The Shit". Cheers, Matt101 20:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fixed request to show links. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 21:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — madman bum and angel 02:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Portal:List of portals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Semi-protection Requesting semi-protection - a page of this importance, perpetually linked on the Main Page, should not have to suffer random vandalism by anonymous users. Ygoloxelfer 21:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    See WP:NOPRO. Declined -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 21:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add purge to tabs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Permanent full protection and/or move to MediaWiki namespace. It is a user JavaScript page that can be edited by anyone, and thus is insecure. Also requesting the same for Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Logs link, Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Formatter, Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Six tabs, Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add LI menu, Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add LI menu/css, and all other JavaScript or CSS pages from WP:US/S that are currently unprotected. See MediaWiki:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Compare link.js for one way that this can be fixed. This represents a potentially dangerous security vulnerability in Wikipedia, as a single person with decent knowledge of JavaScript could put malicious code in any one of these without even logging in. Looking through WP:US/S, I found about 50 pages that should be moved to the MediaWiki namespace or protected. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 01:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Ok, just noticed some of these are already protected. In that case, just protect any that aren't already. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 02:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    All the pages listed above are now protected except for Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add LI menu/css. Despite not being a JavaScript page, I think this should still be protected, as we don't want anyone to be able to edit other people's user CSS either. A creative vandal could quite easily exploit this to change at will how pages appear to anyone with the script installed. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 13:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I think there's a bot already taking care of this; see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 19:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok, looks good then. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 21:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    FIFA 100 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection Requesting semi-protection - this page is being repeatedly vandalised by unregistered users. Dancarney 22:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pax:Vobiscum 02:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    IFPI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection Requesting semi-protection - this page is being repeatedly vandalised by registered users. --Oneiros 01:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pax:Vobiscum 02:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    WorkChoices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Unprotect article. The semi-protection was a pre-emptive one by protecting admin and doesn't seem to have been placed up due to any existing conflict. Regardless, it's been a while and probably isn't needed anymore. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 21:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Australian Labor Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Unprotect article. The brief edit war between SPAs has been over for a while (~3 months) and semi-protection isn't necessary. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 21:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected--JForget 00:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Mudaliar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request for unprotection as the original admin redirected me here [2]. Protected version is the vandalized version by the users User:Casper21 , SiddharthRaju , Raghav_NS. Users User:Casper21 , SiddharthRaju , Raghav_NS are sockpuppets of the same user user:Mudaliar proven in [[3]]. These users have been banned now. So edits can continue. Saedirof 20:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 21:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:No original research (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:No original research|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Remove semi-permanent protection Admin protected page without time limit nearly a month ago, and has declined to set a reasonable time limit. The dispute has been under discussion for a long time now, and it is time to see if any constructive changes can result. If edit warring resumes, then the page should be re-protected with a reasonable time limit each time. Semi-permanent protection of policy pages is not a good precedent. Dhaluza 11:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Everett, Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    unprotection , This article has been protected for quite some time now -- shall we open it up and see if it's safe?.SarekOfVulcan 03:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined by Lar. – Steel 23:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Mouse (computing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Unprotect article and talk. The majority of the disruption is focused on the addition of a specific link combined with a questionable or incorrect interpretation, and is currently handled by an anti-vandalism bot as the link in question does not exist on the pages in question. If the disruption returns, the pages can be protected once again (Be sure to state this in the edit summary for unprotection.) --Sigma 7 03:42, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    By the way - page re-protection won't necessarly go through WP:RFPP, there are some admins that are already familiar with the situation that can reprotect the page. As the dispute is with the Mousepad article, the bot should be good enough to keep other pages from having the link inserted (as shown in WP:LTA#User:Moisesxyz). --Sigma 7 03:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Glenridge Middle School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi protection Dispute, Has been receiving a lot of vandalism from IPs and VOAs.Avant Guard 19:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Maxim(talk) (contributions) 19:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Bean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. As per Talk:Bean#Vandalism high level of IP vandalism, requiring constant attention by regular editors of the subject area, substantive changes are relatively uncommon.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Maxim(talk) (contributions) 19:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Judge Rotenberg Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. High level of vandalism. Several users are adding false information.68.162.234.35 19:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, there's been no edits to it. Maxim(talk) (contributions) 19:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Greece (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. ForeignerFromTheEast 19:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Maxim(talk) (contributions) 19:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Nobel medal dsc06171.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    temporary full protection. Content dispute. A user NYScholar is waging a one-man campaign to rewrite this page in ways to try to get it outright deleted. See also parallel disputes at WP:FUR and WP:PUI, where he has brought up this issue, and then persisted in rejecting the response he has been given.

    Recuse; urge an admin looks into it. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 03:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed template so that it's an li. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 19:06, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Moved to top to keep the bot from accidentally moving it down with actioned ones. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 19:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined - Seems to have cooled down. Maxim(talk) (contributions) 19:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:Cowboy Rocco (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Cowboy Rocco was removing the unblock tempate off his page, like it says in the corner, and had his page protected. This was during a controversial time, and I'm under the impression that he was just following the instructions "...remove this template after 4 days...". For controversy's sake, why not even just make an archive on his page and protect that? YДмΔќʃʀï→ГC← 10-23-2007 • 19:47:12 19:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Note:This event ocurred 4+ months ago. YДмΔќʃʀï→ГC← 10-23-2007 • 19:47:12


    Mark Twain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary semi-prot This page has been torn up in the last 2 days. I had to go back 24 hours to find a good revert earlier. Probably being studied somewhere, so a couple days of semi-prot might keep it a usable resource. Arakunem 18:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Maxim(talk) (contributions) 19:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    John A. Macdonald (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, High level of vandalism. Rizla 18:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Maxim(talk) (contributions) 19:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Francis Bacon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Recurrence of vandalism - vulgarities and blanking of the article. Emery 18:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Maxim(talk) (contributions) 19:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Chinese military (edit | [[Talk:Template:Chinese military|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Additionally, Chinese People's Liberation Army ranks insignia, Chinese People's Liberation Army Air Force ranks insignia, and Chinese People's Liberation Navy ranks insignia.

    indefinite semi-protection, these sets of redirects are targets for sockpuppets of banned user Roitr. Aldis90 15:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    List of characters in Camp Lazlo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    indefinite semi-protection , This article has proven to be a magnet for vandalism since the semi-prot lift last Thursday. .treelo talk 15:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. MastCell Talk 18:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Censorship by Google (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection. This article is a target of attack by meatpuppets who come from Japanese internet forum 2channel. They don't know Wikipedia policies, have little incentive for conforming to Wikipedia policies, don't check out summary and discussion page, and force through an improper editing (see also Talk:Censorship by Google#Miku Hatsune and User talk:Ezezmog). I think that it's necessary to semi-protect for about a few months because they have no stick-to-itiveness. Thank you for your time and consideration.--int main(void) 13:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    D. James Kennedy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    unprotection Unprotection, Article has been fully protected for a month now. There has been no discussion of the issue leading to that protection for some time, and in any event, the only user arguing against the consensus position has left wikipedia.– ornis⚙ 04:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Seigenthaler controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Protected back when it was a current event, no longer so. -- 146.115.58.152 03:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    • Unprotected - we'll give it a shot. MastCell Talk 18:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Unprotect This page has been semi protected with no time limit from December last year. Beko120 13:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected Come back if vandalism or the hoax reappears. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 19:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Stewie Kills Lois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection, 250 hours. Leaked version on the internet, most edits are adding the torrent link or something about the leak. Will (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time Additionally, semi-protection isn't used to block IP editors in a content dispute; it's meant to prevent vandalism. - auburnpilot talk 18:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Pluto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, High level of vandalism.Carlosguitar 16:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Rondout Valley High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection. This page gets vandalized a lot by angry school kids. Muenda 14:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined The vandalizing IP has been blocked. Pax:Vobiscum 16:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Charles Darwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Requesting semi-protection for 48 hours due to anon IP vandalism. --Neon white 13:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Pax:Vobiscum 15:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Barry Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Heavy vandalism from IP and new editors repeatedly inserting defamatory material.Mattinbgn\talk 11:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pax:Vobiscum 15:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Camp Lazlo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Vandalism, Recent rash of vandalism, due to past history of protection this may need to be indefinite..treelo talk 11:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pax:Vobiscum 15:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Exclusive (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect Anon IPs continuously vandalizing and adding unsourced info about upcoming album. Admc2006 05:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pax:Vobiscum 15:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=166664418"