The Minkowski inequality , also known as Minkowski inequality or inequality of Minkowski called, is an inequality in the border area between the measure theory and functional analysis , two sub-areas of mathematics . It is formulated in different versions, mostly for the sequence space as well as the Lebesgue spaces and . In these spaces it corresponds to the triangle inequality and thus makes them normalized rooms (in the case of a semi-normalized room ).



It is named after Hermann Minkowski , who first showed the inequality for infinite sums in 1896 in the first volume of his Geometry of Numbers .
Formulation for L p spaces
Let and the corresponding L p -space . It is the corresponding norm. So for one is
![{\ displaystyle p \ in [1, \ infty]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/97b602ff0617b1b60e63d22200cad684dc5b26a0)




-
.
Here denotes the essential supremum . The Minkowski inequality then says:

- Is and so is true


-
.
The inequality also applies in (see Lp space # definition ). The (semi) norm is defined identically to the norm, but denoted by. The Minkowski inequality then says:




- Is and so is true


-
.
Formulation for measurable functions
The Minkowski inequality can also be formulated more generally for measurable functions . The agreements for define


-
,
where is a measurable function of the measure space after . Here is or . Then the Minkwoski inequality reads:





- If the functions from to both are measurable, then applies



-
.
Formulation for consequences
The Minkowski inequality also holds for sequences in or in , regardless of whether the sequences converge. It then reads



for .

If you limit yourself to the appropriate sequence space with the norm

-
,
this is the Minkowski inequality
-
.
for the consequences of . This can be viewed as a special case of the inequality for the if one chooses the natural numbers as the basic set and the measure of count as the measure .



proof
The Minkowski inequality is trivial for and . So be it . Since is a convex function , holds





and therefore .

Be in the following without loss of generality . The following applies:


Be . Then q is the Hölder exponent conjugated to p , the following applies:
According to the Hölder inequality :
![{\ begin {aligned} \ | f + g \ | _ {{p}} ^ {{p}} = \ int _ {S} | f + g | ^ {p} & \ leq \ int _ {S} \ left (| f | \ cdot | f + g | ^ {{p-1}} \ right) + \ int _ {S} \ left (| g | \ cdot | f + g | ^ {{p-1 }} \ right) \\ & \ leq \ | f \ | _ {p} \ cdot \ || f + g | ^ {{p-1}} \ | _ {q} + \ | g \ | _ { p} \ cdot \ || f + g | ^ {{p-1}} \ | _ {q} \\ [. 2em] & = (\ | f \ | _ {p} + \ | g \ | _ {p}) \ cdot \ || f + g | ^ {{p-1}} \ | _ {{q}} \\ & = (\ | f \ | _ {p} + \ | g \ | _ {p}) \ cdot \ left (\ int _ {S} | f + g | ^ {{(p-1) \ cdot {\ frac {p} {p-1}}}} \ right) ^ {{ 1 - {\ frac {1} {p}}}} \\ & = (\ | f \ | _ {p} + \ | g \ | _ {p}) \ cdot {\ frac {\ int _ {p } | f + g | ^ {{p}}} {\ left (\ int _ {S} | f + g | ^ {{p}} \ right) ^ {{{\ frac {1} {p}} }}}} \\ & = (\ | f \ | _ {p} + \ | g \ | _ {p}) \ cdot {\ frac {\ | f + g \ | _ {{p}} ^ { {p}}} {\ | f + g \ | _ {{p}}}}, \\\ end {aligned}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/0b0c526f0cf26c651221ef66348ff082e177cd43)
This implies the Minkowski inequality after multiplying both sides by .

Generalization (Minkowski inequality for integrals)
Let and be two measurement spaces and a measurable function, then (Minkowski inequality for integrals):



![\ left [\ int _ {{S_ {2}}} \ left (\ int _ {{S_ {1}}} | F (x, y) | \, d \ mu _ {1} (x) \ right ) ^ {p} d \ mu _ {2} (y) \ right] ^ {{1 / p}} \ leq \ int _ {{S_ {1}}} \ left (\ int _ {{S_ {2 }}} | F (x, y) | ^ {p} \, d \ mu _ {2} (y) \ right) ^ {{1 / p}} d \ mu _ {1} (x),](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/2ea581fa01590b4692ee1306620377875a32cf80)
for . If and both sides are finite, then equality applies precisely if and can be written as the product of two measurable functions .






If we choose the two-element set with the counting measure, we get the usual Minkowski inequality again as a special case , namely with for is




![{\ begin {aligned} \ | f_ {1} + f_ {2} \ | _ {p} & = \ left [\ int _ {{S_ {2}}} \ left | \ int _ {{S_ {1 }}} F (x, y) \, d \ mu _ {1} (x) \ right | ^ {p} d \ mu _ {2} (y) \ right] ^ {{1 / p}} \ \ & \ leq \ int _ {{S_ {1}}} \ left (\ int _ {{S_ {2}}} | F (x, y) | ^ {p} \, d \ mu _ {2} (y) \ right) ^ {{1 / p}} d \ mu _ {1} (x) \\ & = \ | f_ {1} \ | _ {p} + \ | f_ {2} \ | _ {p}. \ end {aligned}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/45b31705c4a7c0d39caa3e2b7de3a61a70b166fa)
Web links
literature
- Herbert Amann, Joachim Escher: Analysis III . 1st edition. Birkhäuser-Verlag Basel Boston Berlin, 2001, ISBN 3-7643-6613-3
Individual evidence
-
↑ a b c Jürgen Elstrodt : Measure and integration theory . 6th, corrected edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2009, ISBN 978-3-540-89727-9 , pp. 224-226 , doi : 10.1007 / 978-3-540-89728-6 .
-
^ Hans Wilhelm Alt : Linear functional analysis . 6th edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2012, ISBN 978-3-642-22260-3 , p. 57 , doi : 10.1007 / 978-3-642-22261-0 .
-
↑ Achim Klenke: Probability Theory . 3. Edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2013, ISBN 978-3-642-36017-6 , p. 154 , doi : 10.1007 / 978-3-642-36018-3 .