Reichsfinanzhof
The Reichsfinanzhof ( RFH ) was the highest German authority for rulings and decisions in matters relating to Reich tax between 1918 and 1945.
history
Emergence
In the context of the introduction of a sales tax in mid-1918, the question of equal treatment in the territory of the Reich arose, as implementation was a matter for the 26 countries with different authorities. During the discussion about this new tax, the idea of an empire's own tax court came up as the final instance in tax disputes. In the further course, one wanted to not only limit the court to tax matters, but also take into account a possible expansion of jurisdiction in the name. That is why the Reichstag decided not to use the name Reich Tax Court , but instead Reichsfinanzhof, while the Federal Council chose Munich as its seat. The RFH was established by law of July 26, 1918; it began its activities on October 1, 1918.
Contrary to what the terms Reich Tax Court or Reich Finance Court suggest, it was not a court in the sense of the third state authority , but an authority of the Reich finance administration . The Reich Finance Minister proposed the judges to the Reich President for appointment.
The Reichsfinanzhof also decided on the compatibility of Land and Reich law ( Art. 13 Para. 2 WRV in conjunction with Section 6 State Tax Act / Financial Equalization Act), unless the Reich Court was responsible.
Weimar Republic
The substructure of the RFH, the state finance courts , was only created in 1922. In the period that followed, the RFH was able to develop a certain degree of independence and ultimately also checked regulations and orders from the ministry. The court developed its own view of things. So was z. B. the financial situation of the state an important influencing factor on the judiciary. In general, however, it was less the individual case that was considered, but rather the effect on the tax system itself. The RFH came under fire for drafting expert reports on behalf of the Reich and the Länder that could not go unnoticed in later judgments.
National Socialism
The Law to Restore the Civil Service also affected the RFH. Several judges have been retired or transferred to other authorities. During the introduction of the new court president Ludwig Mirre on April 13, 1935, the State Secretary in the RFM, Fritz Reinhardt , expressed his opinion on the future tasks of the RFH.
He stated that the RFH had to consider regulations and judgments from the time before January 30, 1933 in accordance with the National Socialist worldview . The basis for this is the Tax Adjustment Act of 1934. However, the RFH tried to maintain its freedoms, or at least a limited independence, and only partially responded to Reinhardt's demands. This prompted the RFM to test their strengths, which the RFH ultimately had to give in. The Führer Decree to Simplify Administration of August 28, 1939 repealed the state tax courts, the substructure of the RFH, and replaced them with departments for processing contestation matters at the regional tax authorities. It was still possible to lodge a legal complaint with the RFH against the decisions of these departments, but only if the responsible chief finance officer agreed.
The judgments with Jewish participants were usually to their disadvantage. It became quite common for the RFM to intervene in cases and for the RFH to follow the Ministry's opinion.
Development of legal cases from 1933 to 1942 | |||
year |
New arrivals |
Total pending |
Done |
---|---|---|---|
1933 | 3,827 | 6,448 | 4.117 |
1934 | 3,074 | 5,405 | 3,642 |
1935 | 2,921 | 4,684 | 3,320 |
1936 | 2,882 | 4,246 | 2,904 |
1937 | 3,496 | 4,665 | 2,936 |
1938 | 3,402 | 5.131 | 3,314 |
1939 | 3,051 | 4,868 | 3,079 |
1940 | 2.114 | 3,743 | 2,494 |
1941 | 1,802 | 3,051 | 2.121 |
1942 | 1,497 | 2,427 | 1,644 |
The successor was the Federal Fiscal Court .
structure
At the beginning of 1944 the following business distribution was in effect:
- Great Senate
- Cases according to Section 66 (1) of the Reich Tax Code, cases according to Section 5 (2) and Section 6 of the Financial Equalization Act, assessment of the general part of the Reich Assessment Act, assessment of the Financial Equalization Act, assessment of cases involving several senates
- I. Senate
- Corporate income tax , trade tax for corporations, legal complaints for the implementation and amendment of the Bond Stock Act , Saarland income tax for legal entities, Mecklenburg trade tax for corporations
- II. Senate
- Capital transfer tax , transfer duty , land transfer tax , vehicle tax , transportation tax , insurance tax , fire protection tax , Betting and lottery tax , stamp duty , capital gains expensive country
- III. senate
- Empire Review , industrial pollution and application, rich wealth tax , flight tax , inheritance tax , gift tax , estate tax , basic value added tax , rent control , rent tax , appreciation tax , debt taxes , paths delivery of countries
- IV. Senate
- Income tax (unless the VI. Senate is responsible), wage tax , tax deduction from capital gains (unless the I. or VI. Senate is responsible), military tax , citizens ' tax , church tax
- V. Senate
- VAT , customs duties , excise taxes , equalization tax , sweetener tax , beer tax , beverage tax of countries and communities Helgoländische common control your vehicle
- VI. senate
- Income tax from commercial operations or agriculture and forestry, trade tax (if the first Senate is not responsible), traveling trade tax , Reich tax code (if no other Senate is responsible), financial equalization including double taxation (if not the Grand Senate is responsible), administrative cost subsidies , Bremen company and trade tax , Mecklenburgische Trade tax in favor of Mecklenburg communities
- VI.a Senate
- all disputes that are non-profit, charitable or church purposes.
Register characters
- A - Judgment proceedings (legal complaints)
- B - Decision-making process
- D - expert opinion
- F - criminal matters
- Gr.S. - Great Senate
people
President
- 1918 to 1930: Gustav Jahn
- 1931 to 1933: Herbert Dorn
- 1933 to 1934: Richard Kloß
- 1935 to 1945: Ludwig Mirre
Other relatives
- Enno Becker , President of the Senate, 1922 to 1933
- Georg von Breunig , President of the Senate, 1920 to 1923
- Robert Evers, President of the Senate, 1929-1934
- Friedrich Gaschott , Reich Finance Councilor , 1921 to 1934
- Oskar Grünewald, President of the Senate
- Hans Müller , 1933 to 1945
- Heinz Maria Oeftering , Government Councilor , 1932 to 1934
- Georg Strutz , President of the Senate, 1918 to 1929
- Heinrich Zapf , President of the Senate, 1924 to 1934
See also
literature
- Bundesfinanzhof: 75 years Reichsfinanzhof. Stollfuss, Bonn 1994, ISBN 3-08-470293-4 .
- Klaus-Dieter Drüen / Johanna Hey / Rudolf Mellinghoff (eds.): 100 years of tax law in Germany. Festschrift for the Federal Fiscal Court. Otto Schmidt, Cologne 2018, ISBN 978-3-504-01898-6 .
- Martin Friedenberger (Hrsg.): The realm finance administration in the national socialism. Presentation and documents. Temmen, Bremen 2002, ISBN 3-86108-377-9 ( publications of the Memorial and Educational Center House of the Wannsee Conference 1).
- Herbert Leidel: The justification of the Reich finance administration. Stollfuss, Bonn 1964 ( series of publications by the Federal Ministry of Finance 1, ISSN 0433-7204 ), (Münster, diss.).
- Collection of decisions and reports from the Reichsfinanzhof ( RFHE , 1.1920–53.1944 / 54.1952; ZDB -ID 203197-8 )
Web links
- Ordinance on the official costume at the Reichsfinanzhof of January 13, 1937
- Press release 80 years of the Reichsfinanzhof
- Federal Fiscal Court with the history of the RFH
- dejure.org: RFH case law overview
Individual evidence
- ↑ RGBl. P. 959
- ↑ of March 30, 1920 ( RGBl. P. 402 ). In addition, Hans Heinrich Lammers , Walter Simons (ed.): The case law of the State Court for the German Reich and the Reich Court on the basis of Article 13, Paragraph 2 of the Weimar Constitution. Volume 3, Department C: Decisions of the Reich Finance Court ( ZDB -ID 977275-3 ). There are 11 decisions and 2 reports: RGBl. 1921 p. 1332 = RFHE 6, 108 (Lippe, municipal tax surcharges ); RGBl. 1921 p. 1268 = RFHE 6, 187 (Baden-Baden, surcharge on real estate transfer tax); RGBl. 1922 I p. 215 = RFHE 7, 266 (Braunschweig, mining tax ); RFHE 7, 279 (expert opinion: interpretation of §§ 5 and 6 LandesStG); RGBl. 1922 I p. 751 = RFHE 9, 123 (Ilmenau / Unterpörlitz, consumption tax of coal); RFHE 12, 315 (expert opinion: municipal taxes on cattle slaughter); RGBl. 1924 I p. 153 = RFHE 13, 58 (Prussia, stamp duty ); RGBl. 1926 I p. 108 = RFHE 18, 105 (Mecklenburg-Schwerin, property accessories / draft); RGBl. 1927 I p. 40 = RFHE 20, 54 (Hessen, AG-FAG) and RFHE 20, 21 (Bremen, school fees); RGBl. 1927 I p. 70 = RFHE 20, 189 (Lippe, wayside maintenance); RGBl. 1929 I p. 15 = RFHE 24, 221 (Saxony, stamp duty); RGBl. 1933 I p. 104 = RFHE 32, 339 (Baden, branch tax)
- ^ Karl Groh: The realm finance administration . Berlin, 1944, pp. 126-127
- ^ Karl Groh: The realm finance administration . Berlin, 1944, pp. 123-125; Earlier business distribution plans : DStZ 1930 p. 34 , 1934 p. 285 , 1938 p. 16 ; see also the rules of procedure of the Reichsfinanzhof dated May 29, 1920 ( ZBl. p. 861)
Coordinates: 48 ° 8 ′ 57 ″ N , 11 ° 36 ′ 20 ″ E