Constitutional reality

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

With constitutional reality are in the legal and political and historical science , partly, building on the constitutional theory of Carl Schmitt (1928), the realities within a political system called.

This descriptive view must be differentiated from the political order normatively prescribed by the constitution , because the formal role of the actors in a state can differ greatly from their real behavior, their rights and their influence. This can be clearly illustrated by the British political system : Formally, the head of state , i.e. the queen, has all sovereign rights of rule . In reality, the Parliament ( lower house ) and the Prime Minister elected by it are the actual bearers of power in the British state, which is why the constitutional text and constitutional reality differ greatly here .

Furthermore, the term is an important analytical tool in research on constitutional history , since the above-described facts must also be assumed for many historical state structures. For example, the political system of the Holy Roman Empire can not be adequately understood solely from constitutional sources. Other historical sources are to be consulted in order to grasp the political and social reality against the background of the traditional legal bases.

Examples from Austria

literature

Web links