Talk:David Bawden and Mount Osmond, South Australia: Difference between pages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
summary: removed "forum" discussion (not allowed) about disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point (not allowed), and fixed formatting error in DGG's statement
 
Malleus Fatuorum (talk | contribs)
→‎European Settlement: comma in large number
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Australian Place | type = suburb
{{talkpage}}
| name = Mount Osmond
{{Project Catholicism|class=Start|importance=low}}
| city = Adelaide
{{WPBiography
| state = sa
|living=yes
| image = An adelaide sunrise.jpg
|class=Start
| caption =
|priority=low
| lga = City of Burnside
|listas=Bawden, David
| postcode = 5064
| pop = 612 (2006 Census)<ref>{{Census 2006 AUS|id=SSC42106|name=Mount Osmond (State Suburb)|quick=on|accessdate=2008-06-07}}</ref>
| area =
| propval = [http://www.domain.com.au/Public/SuburbReport.aspx?searchTerm=5064&mode=+%24257%2C000 $500,000] (2005)
| stategov = [[Electoral district of Bragg (South Australia)|Bragg]]
| fedgov = [[Division of Sturt|Sturt]]
| near-nw = [[St. Georges, South Australia|St. Georges]]
| near-n = [[Beaumont, South Australia|Beaumont]]
| near-ne = [[Burnside, South Australia|Burnside]]
| near-w = [[Glen Osmond, South Australia|Glen Osmond]]
| near-e = [[Waterfall Gully, South Australia|Waterfall Gully]]
| near-sw = [[Urrbrae, South Australia|Urrbrae]]
| near-s = [[Leawood Gardens, South Australia|Leawood Gardens]]
| near-se = [[Waterfall Gully, South Australia|Waterfall Gully]]
| dist1 = 5
| location1= Adelaide
}}
}}
'''Mount Osmond''' ({{coord|34|57|S|138|39|E|region:AU-SA_type:city}}) is a small suburb of 2,497 people in the [[South Australia]]n capital city of [[Adelaide]]. It is part of the [[City of Burnside]] [[Local Government Areas in Australia|Local Government Area]] and located in the foothills of the [[Adelaide Hills]], five kilometres south east of the city centre. The suburb is high on the hill of the same name, which is the last hill on the right when approaching Adelaide down the [[South Eastern Freeway]] before the road levels out onto the [[Adelaide Plains]]. It is bounded to the north by the suburb of [[Beaumont, South Australia|Beaumont]], to the north-east by [[Burnside, South Australia|Burnside]], to the east by [[Waterfall Gully]], to the south by [[Leawood Gardens, South Australia|Leawood Gardens]]/[[Eagle on the Hill, South Australia|Eagle on the Hill]], to the south-west by [[Urrbrae, South Australia|Urrbrae]], to the west by [[Glen Osmond, South Australia|Glen Osmond]] and to the north-west by [[St. Georges, South Australia|St. Georges]].


The suburb is at a high elevation in the Mount Lofty Ranges, and provides views over Adelaide as well as containing a renowned golf course and Country Club. Mining operations in the 19th century gave the area notoriety, but it has since developed slowly into a small, quiet and secluded suburb.


==History==
''from VfD:''
===Aboriginal Culture===
In Australian [[Dreamtime (mythology)|Aboriginal mythology]], Mount Osmond is part of the Mount Lofty Ranges and is therefore part of the story of the ancestor-creator ''Nganno''. Travelling across the land of the native [[Kaurna]] people, Nganno was wounded in a battle and laid down to die, forming the Mount Lofty Ranges. The current name of the Greater Mount Lofty Parklands, ''Yurrebilla'', is taken from the Kaurna name for the twin hills of [[Mount Lofty]] and [[Mount Bonython]], which are supposed to be Nganno's ears. The Kaurna people were hunter gatherers who inhabited the Adelaide Plains and surrounding regions. Among their customs were burn-offs (controlled [[bushfires]]) in the Adelaide Hills which the early Europeans spotted before the Kaurna people were pushed out by settlement. By 1852, the total population (by census count) of the Kaurna was 650 in the Adelaide region and steadily decreasing. Mount Osmond would have been inhabited by the Kaurna during the winter, when they moved into the hills for better shelter and firewood. {{ref|kaurna}}


===European Settlement===
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
[[Image:Mount barker road 1900.jpg|left|thumb|250px|Mount Barker Road, 1900]]
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
When Adelaide was first planned and mapped out by Col. [[William Light]], Mount Osmond received the three allotments 1070, 1277 and 1278. While much of Adelaide was relatively quickly bought (but not necessarily settled) Mount Osmond did not enjoy any early buyers. The first reported activity in the area was after the mining rush of [[Glen Osmond, South Australia|Glen Osmond]] due to the [[Wheal Watkins]] and Wheal Gawler mines. Lot 1277 yielded a mine in Slaughterhouse Gully but it was worked only briefly. Subsequent finds of [[bluestone]] proved fruitful and the mineral was extracted until 1900, when mining ended and the last of the mines were either filled in or cordoned off. Some entrances to these former mines can still be found today.
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the VfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->


[[Image:Mountosmond 1930.jpg|thumb|200px|right|A horse and rider on Mount Osmond, 1930]]
The result of the debate was '''KEEP'''
[[Real estate developer|Developers]] eventually bought the [[Real property|lot]]s that composed Mount Osmond but once again interest in the suburb was minor. Attempts to bring in settlers culminated in the construction of Mount Osmond Road in 1882. It wound around the hills from where it began as an offshoot of [[Adelaide-Crafers Highway|Mount Barker Road]] in the South. Developers broke down the three large lots into roughly two hundred one-acre ones in the hope of sales&nbsp;– one of the more adventurous real-estate attempts in early Adelaide history. A few lots were sold to [[quarry]]men and [[garden]]ers around Mount Barker Road, but the vast remainder was leased to stockowners as pasture for their livestock. Much of Mount Osmond, along with a large portion of the surrounding area, was bought in 1907 by Ernest C. Sanders. His family made great use of the land, with his sons building houses on the vast property while raising sheep and growing hay. Considerable time was spent by the Sanders family in naming and mapping the area as they built fences and filled in several remaining [[mine shaft]]s.


[[Image:Walktrack.JPG|left|thumb|250px|One of Mount Osmond's walking trails - this land is owned by the highways department and was going to be used for a possible alternative route to the [[South Eastern Freeway]] in the 1960s. Mount Osmond Golf Course can be seen to the left.]]The Sanders family eventually decided to sell much of their portion of Mount Osmond, and around 1922–23 it was put on the market. Like earlier attempts at sales on Mount Osmond, little interest was received and none was sold until 1927. The land was developed into a [[golf course]] and [[Country Club]] with the assistance of the [[City of Burnside|Burnside Council]] and its engineers. Credit to the novel idea went to H.E.S. Melbourne, Burnside's chief engineer at the time&nbsp;– who found support among numerous Burnside [[Councillors]]. The golf course and country club were developed on the highest part of the mount, on eighty-five acres of former Sanders estate. The remaining land was sold by the country club to buyers with strict rules on the development and maintenance of the properties&nbsp;– specific rules applying to aesthetic features, particularly gardens, are of note. Even with a golf course and country club in the vicinity, as well as electricity and a water supply from [[Waterfall Gully]]'s first creek the eighteen marketed lots once again sold poorly.{{ref|golfclub}}
If notable, this is definitely worth including; but it does not appear to be even remotely notable? &#8212; [[User:Bill Thayer|Bill]] 21:43, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Not notable. Known kook, worth perhaps a mention in an article about kooks, but not in a serious context. --[[User:Neschek|Neschek]] 21:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*<s>Delete Neutral</s> '''Keep''' :). <s>You don't get to be pope just because 6 people (including your mother and father) vote for you. 214 google hits for [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Pope+Michael+I%22&sourceid=firefox&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 "Pope Michael I"], so not notable.</s> [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 21:49, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC). On second though, though there are not many google hits, they are somewhat relevant. [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 21:59, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC). After some consideration I think we should keep him. He is a bit obscure, but a google search gives some news articles talking bout him, so he is somewhat known. It is somewhat interesting to read. [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 20:25, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*'''Abstain''' I am strongly for elimination of useless articles about esoteric topics, but I must confess I knew this guy's website and has already spent some time a few months ago having a laugh there. So he is perhaps not as totally unknown as one could think... Or it is a funny coincidence (this is only the second day I visit this ''Votes for deletion'' page !). --[[User:French Tourist|French Tourist]] 22:39, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*Keep. I realize it's a marginal topic, but I think there is some limited basis for notability here, if only because it is a point of interest to those who like to note the various religious leaders in the world who have splintered off from mainstream Catholicism and call themselves popes. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 22:51, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Antipope]] or [[Sedevacantism]], probably the former. Information already exists. The individual is not notable unlike the other antipopes, and there is really no need for an article on him. -[[User:Vina|Vina]] 23:47, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*Merge and redirect, or just redirect, to [[Sedevacantism]]. This is very much of a splinter group. While it would be POV for us to call him an anti-pope, it would be POV of us to not call him one. Having him listed where he belongs, with his group, is the most logical thing. Having him at [[Pope Michael]] is right out, because that calls him pope. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 01:26, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*Keep. A na&iuml;ve little domestic Pope, but amusing in his presumption. Does anybody know where I can get a ''whole bunch'' of yard signs printed? (It might be helpful to move the page to his birth name and make this redirect there. [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] 04:08, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC) <doing his [[James Thurber]] imitation -- [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]]|[[User talk:Jmabel|Talk]] 23:10, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)>
*I'm pretty sure this one has been listed on VfD once before. I'll look into it when I have more time. No vote yet. [[User:Fire Star|Fire Star]] 04:12, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
**Here we go - [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Antipope Michael]]. It isn't exactly the same article, but is the same subject. Still no vote from me as yet. [[User:Fire Star|Fire Star]] 04:27, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
***Well, I believe the main reason we voted to delete then was because it was a duplicate of this article. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 11:43, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Needs more notability to be listed here. 6 people?! --[[User:Pgunn|Improv]] 04:19, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*Keep, probably notable enough for Wikipedia. [[User:Siroxo| ]]&mdash;[[User:Siroxo|<font color=#627562>siro</font>]][[User talk:Siroxo|<font color=#627562>''&chi;''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Siroxo|<font color=#627562>o</font>]] 04:57, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete. Die, vanity, die. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 08:19, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*Comment: We have a pretty good article on a similar religious figure, [[Lucian Pulvermacher]] (or Pius XIII). It seems to me that either someone should list that one too, or we should keep both of them, because I can discern no real difference in significance. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 19:41, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
*Weak '''keep.''' Doesn't look like vanity to me. [[User:Gwalla|<nowiki></nowiki>]] &mdash; [[User:Gwalla|Gwalla]] | [[User talk:Gwalla|Talk]] 23:28, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
* unambiguous '''keep'''. This guy may be nuttier than a fruit cake but he is part of a phenomenon in post-Vatican II Roman Catholicism of self-proclaimed anti-Vatican II antipopes. We have two major articles on two figures, both of whom deserve to be here. As part of this phenomenon, this guy (and other self-proclaimed popes) also deserve a place because they are part of a current cultural phenomenon. However they are different sometimes in emphasis so can't be always put together in one article. A category now exists to pull together the three on here and the others when they are added, and tie them in to articles on the topic of sedevacantism. This article is simply a stub that needs broadening. This guy isn't a major player but as a wider cultural phenomenon his place here can be justified a lot more easily than, say, articles on individual high schools that have no importance beyond the school or town. [[User:Jtdirl|''Fear'''ÉIREANN''''']] 19:59, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div>
''end moved discussion''


One of the last large land purchases was that of Ross Thiem in the 1940s. A club member, C.W. Lloyd, sold 200 acres around the golf course, which was again used as pasture by Thiem, who ran sheep on the property - and was the last to do so. The Highways Department also acquired land in 1951, buying two hundred acres of land above Beaumont for future transport planning. Thiem's land was eventually sold in the 1950s, to the Rossdale Property Co. Their subsequent attempts at selling the land were just as fruitless as those before, and once again the property changed hands to the Mount Osmond Heights Pty Ltd. The land was newly [[subdivision (land)|subdivided]], and it was in the late 1960s that finally much of Mount Osmond was sold to residential buyers. Fifty-two out of the 116 new sites had been sold by 12 October 1968 at an average of $3,500, according to the Adelaide daily ''[[The Advertiser (Australia)|The Advertiser]]''. Since the brilliant land sales of that era, Mount Osmond has developed slowly because of the scarcity of land and the housing and development restrictions of the [[Hills Face Zone]].{{ref|paddock}} Now the suburb is home to large, extravagant, tree-filled houses and properties. With the upgrade of Mount Barker Road to the [[Adelaide-Crafers Highway]] (leading to the [[South Eastern Freeway]]) from 1997, Mount Osmond received its own [[freeway interchange]] as part of the development.
* Keep, he's a nut, but by documenting them in a NPOV manner, wikipedia can show their nuttiness to the world [[User:Mbisanz|Mbisanz]] 05:35, August 19, 2005 (UTC)


[[Image:Adelaide panorama wiki.jpg|thumb|center|598px|[[Panoramic photography|Panoramic]] view of Adelaide from Mount Osmond]]
::Everyking,


==Geography==
I do not understand why you keep removing matter that proves the validity of Pope Michael's claim, and compromising the text to make him look like a kook.
[[Image:Mountosmond map.svg|left|240px|thumb|Location of Mount Osmond in the Adelaide Metropolitan Area.]]
Mount Osmond is composed of the Mount itself and a ridge (Long Ridge) stretching out to the south-east between the valley of the South Eastern Freeway and that of Waterfall Gully. Much of the suburb is more than 300 metres above sea level, with the Mount Osmond peak itself (located in the Golf Course grounds near the club house) at 384 metres. Between the North-East and North-West are slopes leading down to the suburbs of Beaumont, Glen Osmond and Waterfall Gully, most of which is owned as public land by various government departments&nbsp;– either as parks, tracks or vacant land for possible future use. A somewhat "ring" of reserves exist on the slopes anti-clockwise from the Old Bullock Track to Mount Osmond Road near the freeway interchange. Cleland Conservation Park is responsible for maintaining the Mount Osmond Reserve, which is adjacent to the track that winds past the golf course on the east as the Pioneer Women's Heritage Trail.


[[Image:Osmond_sheep.jpg|right|240px|thumb|Goats in a Mount Osmond Paddock]]
I would like to restore the text as it was; I would also like to add the quote from Fr. William Jurgens: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fr._William_Jurgens
The Heritage Trail then becomes the Old Bullock/Long Ridge track as it continues along Long Ridge towards Eagle on the Hill. Much of the housing and residential properties are on the North-West side of the Mount, as to enable views over Adelaide. A few small settlements and paddocks with livestock (sheep, goats and deer) are still present on the slopes between the South Eastern Freeway and the Long Ridge Track.{{ref|walking}}


While the suburb still contains a notable amount of native vegetation, and has not been exposed to invasive introduced species like other areas have&nbsp;– much of it was originally cleared for grazing and has yet to grow back to the same extent. Before European Settlement Grey Box, SA Blue Gum, Sheoak, Manna Gum and River Red Gum trees were native to and grew in the area, particularly on the slopes leading down to the [[Adelaide Plains]]. {{ref|natveg}} The Burnside Council is currently extending measures to control weeds in the Mount Osmond Reserves. A Volunteer Friends group has been formed to assist, and Kangaroo Grass and Grey Box trees are being planted.{{ref|planting}}
-Lucio Mas


==Transport==
:I don't want Michael to look like a kook, I just want the article to be neutral. You can't just have it say that all that Michael and his supporters claim about the mainstream Church is true. You have to phrase it in such a way as not to promote either point of view. [[User:Everyking|Everyking]] 20:26, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[[Image:Mountosmondinterechange_sefreeway.JPG|left|240px|thumb|The Mount Osmond Interchange on the South Eastern Freeway. Mount Osmond Road can be seen winding up the hill on the right]]Due to the suburb's relative isolation and hilly geography, it contains very few roads and does not conform to Adelaide's typical grid pattern&nbsp;– despite the suburb's age. The earliest road to be built was Mount Osmond Road, and done so by early developers in 1882 to make the suburb more attractive to prospective buyers. Mount Osmond Road remains one of two sealed roads which can today access Mount Osmond and is located to the South of the suburb. It begins as the first interchange on the [[South Eastern Freeway]] (formerly Mount Barker Road) and then winds around the Mount to the top of the mount and around the golf course. In the 19th century when a toll was in place for use of Mount Barker Road, drivers made use of Mount Osmond Road to avoid both the toll booth and the toll. The other sealed road that provides access to Mount Osmond is Hayward Drive, which starts in [[Beaumont, South Australia|Beaumont]] and then winds around the hills to meet the rest of the suburb's road network.{{ref|freeway}}


Numerous fire and walking tracks, among them the Old Bullock Track and the Pioneer Women's Heritage Trail, also access Mount Osmond from [[Waterfall Gully, South Australia|Waterfall Gully]], [[Eagle on the Hill]], [[Beaumont, South Australia|Beaumont]] and Glen Osmond. Public Transport is provided by the [[Adelaide Metro]], but no buses run through Mount Osmond itself. Stops can be found in neighbouring suburbs. The bikeway adjacent to the South Eastern Freeway winds past at the foot of Mount Osmond and can be accessed through the interchange.{{ref|interchange}}
== Move ==


==Residents==
This page has been moved to the subject's birth name, since he is not generally accepted as a [[Pope]] of the [[Catholic Church]] and should not be listed by a "Papal" name since the other 20th century antipopes are not (e.g. "Lucian Pulvermacher" instead of "Pope Pius XIII"). -- [[User:Iceberg3k|Iceberg3k]] 19:46, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
[[Image:Mt osmond foreign.GIF|right|240px|thumb|Percentages of the fifth of the population born abroad]]
In the 2001 [[Australian Bureau of Statistics]] Census of Population and Housing, the population of the Mount Osmond census area{{ref|abs}} was 2,497&nbsp;people, in an area of 6.08 square kilometres. Females outnumbered males 54.2% to 45.8%. Some 21.4% of the population was born overseas. The eight strongest religious affiliations in the area were (in descending order): [[Anglican]], [[Roman Catholic|Catholic]], [[Uniting Church in Australia|Uniting]], [[Lutheranism|Lutheran]], [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox Christian]], [[Presbyterian]], [[Baptist]], [[Church of Christ]], [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] and [[Islam]]. The three most common forms of dwelling were (in decreasing order): a separate house, a semi-detached house, and a flat or apartment. Mount Osmond residents are more affluent than the Adelaide average, with a high occurrence of incomes over [[Australian dollar|AU$]]1,000 per week, which is also the second highest in the City of Burnside. A majority of workers are employed in professional or [[white collar]] fields.


The average age in Mount Osmond is increasing, though at a lesser rate than in Australia as a whole. Mount Osmond has the second highest proportion of under-18s in the City of Burnside and the second lowest number of couples without children. Family numbers are also stable (2.6) with only a 0.01% drop between the 1996 and 2001 censuses. Also of note is the high occurrence of [[religion|religious]] affiliation (73%) in Mount Osmond in comparison to the Adelaide (and national) average. Christian affiliation (70%) is most prominent, with little growth in other religions.{{ref|abs}}
== Sentence ==
"but none others than those who did finally participate responded" - is it just me or this sentence doesn't make any sense? It sounds like "I wanted to eat a bag of chips but finally I only ate the chips I wanted"...


==Attractions==
:problem addressed.
[[Image:Heywardroad.JPG|left|thumb|240px|Hayward Drive winding up into Mount Osmond over Adelaide]]
Mount Osmond contains a number of historical attractions; notably in the former mines and mining infrastructure that remains on the hillside as a reminder of its past. The mines continue up throughout the hills from [[Glen Osmond, South Australia|Glen Osmond]]. While Wheal Gawler and Wheal Watkins are former open-cut mines (located in Glen Osmond), Mount Osmond contains more mineshafts which are up to sixty metres deep.{{ref|postcards}} The Burnside Historical Society runs guided tours throughout (and underground into) the mines on the third Sunday of each month.{{ref|burnsidehistory}} Mount Osmond Golf Course is located on the very top of the suburb, and includes its peak. Open only to members, the course's fairways and greens provide a spectacular backdrop of the Adelaide Plains, Mount Lofty Ranges and Golf St. Vincent to members and visitors. The English-Manor style clubrooms also cater to functions and special events.{{ref|golfclub2}} Walking trails are abundant. While a historical walk through the mines can be taken from Beaumont or Glen Osmond, longer walks provide access to numerous attractions including Waterfall Gully's falls, the Cleland Wildlife Park and the Adelaide Hills town of Crafers. Walking the Long Ridge track, between the valley of the South Eastern Freeway and Waterfall Gully provides spectacular views of Adelaide. Mount Osmond also contains a small bed and breakfast, located on Mount Osmond Road.


==Politics==
: Is "doubtless be inaccurate" NPOV? I don't have a proposal, but it should be changed. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] 18:03, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
<table style="float:right; margin-top: 0em; margin-left: 1em;">
<tr>
==Cleanup & NPOV dispute tags==
<td>
{| class="prettytable"
! colspan="3" | 2002 State Election<small>{{ref|stateelec}}</small>
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Liberal}}|&nbsp;
| [[Liberal Party of Australia|Liberal]]
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 67.5%
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Labor}}|&nbsp;
| [[Australian Labor Party|Labor]]
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 20%
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Democrats}}|&nbsp;
| [[Australian Democrats|Democrats]]
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 7.5%
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Family First}}|&nbsp;
| [[Family First]]
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 2.5%
|-
| bgcolor="#D8D8D8" |&nbsp;
| [[SA First]]
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 2.5%
|}
</td>
<td>
{| class="prettytable"
! colspan = 3 |2004 Federal Election<small>{{ref|fedelec}}</small>
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Liberal}}|&nbsp;
| Liberal
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 67.5%
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Labor}}|&nbsp;
| Labor
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 22.5%
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Greens}}|&nbsp;
| [[Australian Greens|Greens]]
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 7%
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Democrats}}|&nbsp;
| Democrats
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 1.5%
|-
| {{Australian politics/party colours/Family First}}|&nbsp;
| Family First
| bgcolor="FFFF99" | 1.5%
|}
</tr></table>


Mount Osmond could be categorised as a fairly socially [[Conservatism|conservative]] and [[economic liberalism|economically liberal]] suburb. Many of its residents, being high-income earners, have benefited from the [[Coalition (Australia)|Coalition]] government's economic policies. The residents are primarily of [[Anglo-Celtic|British descent]] and show higher-than-average religious devotion. This fits in well with the demographic of a stereotypical [[Liberal Party of Australia|Liberal Party]] voter. Consequently the Liberal Party polls very well in the area with over two-thirds of the vote in the last two elections. [[progressivism|Progressive]] parties, such as the [[Australian Labor Party|Labor Party]] and the [[Australian Democrats|Democrats]] (and more recently, the [[Australian Greens|Greens]]) receive the majority of the remaining votes.
I've rewritten the article, including removal of some dubious language (including that mentioned directly above). As few people seem to be disputing the article for a long time, I have removed the NPOV tag. It looks like it was left over from when there was a VfD debate quite a while ago. [[User:Jtdirl|<font color="green">'''Fear'''<font color="orange">'''''ÉIREANN''''']] 23:17, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
: Restoring tag, since your reason is mistaken: whatever went before, ''this'' NPoV tag was less than [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Bawden&diff=11934711&oldid=11934679 4 days old] when you removed it. Let's get a second opinion before next removal. Especially since the judgement of notability may be highly PoV. --[[User:Jerzy|Jerzy]][[User talk:Jerzy| (t)]] 00:16, 2005 Apr 12 (UTC)


Mount Osmond is part of the state [[Electoral district of Bragg (South Australia)|electoral district of Bragg]], which has been held since 2002 by Liberal MP [[Vickie Chapman]]. In federal politics, the suburb is part of the [[division of Sturt]], and has been represented by [[Christopher Pyne]] since 1993.{{ref|pollplace}} The results shown are from the closest polling station to Mount Osmond&nbsp;– which is located outside of the suburb&nbsp;– at St Saviour's Church Hall on Pridmore Road in Glen Osmond.
::Reverted. '''One''' person's assertion of POV is not justification for a tag. If a number of people believed there was justification then there would be justifiable reason for it. But wikipedia does not have a habit of accepting one person ''because they are unhappy'' with an article, proclaiming it POV to everyone who reads it. If it did, then 90% of articles would have the tags. This is a community, Jerzy, not just you. Where is the queue of people agreeing with you? Until there is a clear consensus that there is a POV problem, leave the tag off. Single people going around placing tags without a widespread view that there is a problem is seen as vandalism. [[User:Jtdirl|<font color="green">'''Fear'''<font color="orange">'''''ÉIREANN''''']] 00:28, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)


== Modernism ==
==Notes==
<div class="references-small">
# {{note|kaurna}} ''The Kaurna People, courtesy of the Aboriginal Catholic Ministry'' [http://www.acc.asn.au/Kaurna.htm]
# {{note|paddock}} ''The Paddocks Beneath: A history of Burnside from the beginning, courtesy Elizabeth Warburton (published 1981)''
# {{note|golfclub}} ''Fairways on the Mount, courtesy Mount Osmond Golf Club (published 1977)''
# {{note|walking}} ''Walking Trails, courtesy of the City of Burnside'' [http://www.burnside.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=797]
# {{note|planting}} ''Community Projects, courtesy Urban Forest'' [http://www.urbanforest.on.net/community-projects.htm]
# {{note|natveg}} ''Native Vegetation, courtesy of the City of Burnside'' [http://www.burnside.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=796]
# {{note|interchange}} ''Adelaide-Crafers Highway Route Information, courtesy South Australian Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure'' [http://www.transport.sa.gov.au/transport_network/projects/adel_crafers/route.asp]
# {{note|freeway}} ''Australian Towns, Cities and Highways: South Eastern Freeway, courtesy of M. Greenslade'' [http://www.hotkey.net.au/~krool/photos/sa/sefreeway.html]
# {{note|abs}} ''Community Profile: Glen Osmond/Mount Osmond/Waterfall Gully/Leawood Gardens, courtesy [[Australian Bureau of Statistics|ABS]] and the City of Burnside'' [http://www.id.com.au/burnside/commprofile/default.asp?id=139&gid=130&pg=1&bhcp=1]
# {{note|postcards}} ''Glen Osmond Mines: Glen Osmond in the Adelaide Foothills, courtesy of Postcards and Channel Nine'' [http://esvc001353.wic010u.server-web.com/features/glen_osmond_mines.html]
# {{note|burnsidehistory}} ''Glen Osmond Historical Walks, courtesy of the Burnside Historical Society'' [http://www.burnside.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=863]
# {{note|golfclub2}} ''Welcome to the Mount Osmond Golf Course, courtesy Mount Osmond Golf Club'' [http://www.mtosmondgolf.com.au/]
# {{note|stateelec}} ''State Election 2002 - Polling Booth Results (Glen Osmond, Bragg), courtesy State Electoral Commission'' [http://www.seo.sa.gov.au/results/polling403.htm]
# {{note|fedelec}} ''Federal Election 2004 - Polling Booth Results (Glen Osmond, Sturt), courtesy Australian Electoral Commission'' [http://results.aec.gov.au/12246/results/HousePollingPlaceFirstPrefs-12246-7294.htm]
# {{note|pollplace}} ''Burnside Electorates, courtesy of the City of Burnside'' [http://www.burnside.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=762]
</div>


==References==
:The claim that Pius XII's successors are modernists as conceived by Pope Pius X is dismissed as factually inaccurate by the vast majority of Catholics, who point out that to date every Ecumenical Council has seen some controversy, especially councils which perform major revision and reform work such as the Council of Trent which codified the Tridentine Mass and numerous other reforms in response to the Protestant Reformation.
{{reflist}}


==External links==
This is very vague. It should say something like: "Pius X defined among others A, B and C be "Modernist", Bawden claims the popes are A and B. The mainstream Catholics deny that the popes are A and B because blah blah.". Now it's so vague as to be almost meaningless. [[User:Taw|Taw]] 01:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
* [http://www.mtosmondgolf.com.au/ Mount Osmond Golf Club]
* {{Mapit-AUS-suburbscale|long=138.661|lat=-34.968}}


Followers of Vatican II agree to religious freedom which is condemned by the syllabus. It's irrelevant that many people deny modernism or that councils are surrounded by controversy. Majority-opinion does not determine truth.


{{City of Burnside suburbs}}
== sedevacantism ==


[[Category:Suburbs of Adelaide]]
I don't think that David Bawden should be referred to as a "sedevacantist" because the term is used to describe those who believe that the See of St. Peter is currently vacant. Obviously Bawden doesn't believe this, as he thinks he is the occupant of the See of St. Peter. - Adam

You have a point. Unfortunately, the problem is with the term ''sedevacantist'' and ''sedevacantism''. They are recently invented words (1970's) with various connotations and denotations that are not exactly agreed upon. It is true that primarily, and literally, it refers to people who believe CURRENTLY that the see of Rome is canonically vacant. When you say someone is "a sedevacantist" it immediately brings to mind that the person ''"doesn't recognize the papal claimants in the Vatican since Vatican II"''. This seems to be a necessary connotation of the word. So, when some such followers of David Bawden begins to recognize his own pope outside of Rome and says, ''"I am no longer a sedevacantist"'', it immediately brings to a person's mind that they gave up that former belief and now believe the Vatican II claimants might have be legitimate in their time. It is a failure of language and terminology. Things would be better understood if people simply avoided those invented words. People should, instead of saying, "I am a sedevacantist" or "I am into sedevacantism", say, "I am a Catholic and do not reconize the notorious papal claimants at the Vatican since Vatican II". When people invent all sorts of labels they do so in order (they think) to make things convenient, but in the long wrong it causes more confusion. Convenience (laziness) in language takes away precision and causes problems. - [[User:Diligens|Diligens]] 11:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

== "Pretender" as NPoV ==

_ _ An editor substituted "claimant" for "pretender" (in one of several occurrences), believing that this would help avoid PoV. There is no bright line dividing ''all'' pretenders from all other claimants, but there is a highly visible gap between Bawden and all non-pretender claimants, and avoiding the word "pretender" in these circumstances amounts to endorsement of his PoV that he matters, except to a small group who are widely seen as nutballs and to a few journalists looking for [[Man bites dog|man-bites-dog]] stories.<br>
_ _ The yawning gulf in question is that popes command the respect of hundreds of millions, and some attention of a billionish mob, while Bawden (irrespective of the merits (or lack thereof) of his claim) shows no sign of the respect of more than dozens, and the attention of mostly some harmless drudges like myself. And the only people who expect that to change also believe he has the full attention of universe's only surviving deity, and that she likes to go around doing miracles. If they are right (or more likely, if the universe exhibits, as it constantly does, its disregard for common sense (let alone justice)), we may see that yawning gulf start to close, and we can reconsider whether a reasonable person can take his claim seriously. <br>
_ _ But until such events occur, he remains objectively a pretender. PoV questions about him concern things like whether he's pathetic (yes IMO) and whether his claim to be a chief bridge-builder between humans and a monotheos is comparable to that of the occupant of the Vatican (yes IMO). But calling him a pretender is not only consistent with, but required by NPoV.<br>--[[User:Jerzy|Jerzy]]•[[User talk:Jerzy|t]] 17:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)<br>

== One note ==

"Epikeia" does not translate as equity (aequitas).

:So to what does it translate? [[User:Carl.bunderson|Carl.bunderson]] 06:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

(Greek: epieikes, reasonable)New Catholic Dictionary

An indulgent and benign interpretation of law, which regards a law as not applying in a particular case because of circumstances unforeseen by the lawmaker. The lawmaker cannot foresee all possible cases that may come under the law, and it is therefore reasonably presumed that were the present circumstances known to the legislator he would permit the act, e.g., a mother presumes that she may miss Mass on Sunday when there is no one present to care for her baby. Epikeia is not permitted, however, no matter how grave the inconvenience, if violation of the law would render an act null and void, e.g., to presume that marriage may be contracted because of grave inconvenience in spite of an existing diriment impediment.[[User:Cestusdei|Cestusdei]] 03:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

==Mrs Benns==
Mr Bawden has excommunicated her. http://www.tbenns.vaticaninexile.com/May82007.html

==current status of article==
I think it might hold up in another AfD even today, because there seems to be one or two reliable sources. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 20:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

== American Dream ==

You can become anything in US, even a pope in your basement and get wikipedia article! [[User:Farmanesh|Farmanesh]] ([[User talk:Farmanesh|talk]]) 17:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
:This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Bawden article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. [[User:Dgf32|Dgf32]] ([[User talk:Dgf32|talk]]) 18:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

== Some editors may want to read this ==

[[WP:Not]]--[[User:Mike Searson|Mike]] - [[User_talk:Mike_Searson|Μολὼν λαβέ]] 01:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

== Additional sources needed per [[WP:FRINGE]] ==

The idea that Mr. Bawden is Pope is definitely a Fringe Theory (he has only about 100 followers) ... as such it falls under the notability requirements expressed in [[WP:FRINGE]], which states:
*In order to be notable, a fringe theory should be referenced extensively, and in a serious manner, in at least one major publication, or by a notable group or individual that is independent of the theory. Even debunking or disparaging references are adequate, as they establish the notability of the theory outside of its group of adherents.
So far, this article does not meet this basic requirement. Please establish Mr. Bawden's notability by providing some sources. [[User:Blueboar|Blueboar]] ([[User talk:Blueboar|talk]]) 15:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:32, 13 October 2008

Mount Osmond
AdelaideSouth Australia
File:An adelaide sunrise.jpg
Population612 (2006 Census)[1]
Postcode(s)5064
Location5 km (3 mi) from Adelaide
LGA(s)City of Burnside
State electorate(s)Bragg
Federal division(s)Sturt
Suburbs around Mount Osmond:
St. Georges Beaumont Burnside
Glen Osmond Mount Osmond Waterfall Gully
Urrbrae Leawood Gardens Waterfall Gully

Mount Osmond (34°57′S 138°39′E / 34.950°S 138.650°E / -34.950; 138.650) is a small suburb of 2,497 people in the South Australian capital city of Adelaide. It is part of the City of Burnside Local Government Area and located in the foothills of the Adelaide Hills, five kilometres south east of the city centre. The suburb is high on the hill of the same name, which is the last hill on the right when approaching Adelaide down the South Eastern Freeway before the road levels out onto the Adelaide Plains. It is bounded to the north by the suburb of Beaumont, to the north-east by Burnside, to the east by Waterfall Gully, to the south by Leawood Gardens/Eagle on the Hill, to the south-west by Urrbrae, to the west by Glen Osmond and to the north-west by St. Georges.

The suburb is at a high elevation in the Mount Lofty Ranges, and provides views over Adelaide as well as containing a renowned golf course and Country Club. Mining operations in the 19th century gave the area notoriety, but it has since developed slowly into a small, quiet and secluded suburb.

History

Aboriginal Culture

In Australian Aboriginal mythology, Mount Osmond is part of the Mount Lofty Ranges and is therefore part of the story of the ancestor-creator Nganno. Travelling across the land of the native Kaurna people, Nganno was wounded in a battle and laid down to die, forming the Mount Lofty Ranges. The current name of the Greater Mount Lofty Parklands, Yurrebilla, is taken from the Kaurna name for the twin hills of Mount Lofty and Mount Bonython, which are supposed to be Nganno's ears. The Kaurna people were hunter gatherers who inhabited the Adelaide Plains and surrounding regions. Among their customs were burn-offs (controlled bushfires) in the Adelaide Hills which the early Europeans spotted before the Kaurna people were pushed out by settlement. By 1852, the total population (by census count) of the Kaurna was 650 in the Adelaide region and steadily decreasing. Mount Osmond would have been inhabited by the Kaurna during the winter, when they moved into the hills for better shelter and firewood. [1]

European Settlement

Mount Barker Road, 1900

When Adelaide was first planned and mapped out by Col. William Light, Mount Osmond received the three allotments 1070, 1277 and 1278. While much of Adelaide was relatively quickly bought (but not necessarily settled) Mount Osmond did not enjoy any early buyers. The first reported activity in the area was after the mining rush of Glen Osmond due to the Wheal Watkins and Wheal Gawler mines. Lot 1277 yielded a mine in Slaughterhouse Gully but it was worked only briefly. Subsequent finds of bluestone proved fruitful and the mineral was extracted until 1900, when mining ended and the last of the mines were either filled in or cordoned off. Some entrances to these former mines can still be found today.

A horse and rider on Mount Osmond, 1930

Developers eventually bought the lots that composed Mount Osmond but once again interest in the suburb was minor. Attempts to bring in settlers culminated in the construction of Mount Osmond Road in 1882. It wound around the hills from where it began as an offshoot of Mount Barker Road in the South. Developers broke down the three large lots into roughly two hundred one-acre ones in the hope of sales – one of the more adventurous real-estate attempts in early Adelaide history. A few lots were sold to quarrymen and gardeners around Mount Barker Road, but the vast remainder was leased to stockowners as pasture for their livestock. Much of Mount Osmond, along with a large portion of the surrounding area, was bought in 1907 by Ernest C. Sanders. His family made great use of the land, with his sons building houses on the vast property while raising sheep and growing hay. Considerable time was spent by the Sanders family in naming and mapping the area as they built fences and filled in several remaining mine shafts.

One of Mount Osmond's walking trails - this land is owned by the highways department and was going to be used for a possible alternative route to the South Eastern Freeway in the 1960s. Mount Osmond Golf Course can be seen to the left.

The Sanders family eventually decided to sell much of their portion of Mount Osmond, and around 1922–23 it was put on the market. Like earlier attempts at sales on Mount Osmond, little interest was received and none was sold until 1927. The land was developed into a golf course and Country Club with the assistance of the Burnside Council and its engineers. Credit to the novel idea went to H.E.S. Melbourne, Burnside's chief engineer at the time – who found support among numerous Burnside Councillors. The golf course and country club were developed on the highest part of the mount, on eighty-five acres of former Sanders estate. The remaining land was sold by the country club to buyers with strict rules on the development and maintenance of the properties – specific rules applying to aesthetic features, particularly gardens, are of note. Even with a golf course and country club in the vicinity, as well as electricity and a water supply from Waterfall Gully's first creek the eighteen marketed lots once again sold poorly.[2]

One of the last large land purchases was that of Ross Thiem in the 1940s. A club member, C.W. Lloyd, sold 200 acres around the golf course, which was again used as pasture by Thiem, who ran sheep on the property - and was the last to do so. The Highways Department also acquired land in 1951, buying two hundred acres of land above Beaumont for future transport planning. Thiem's land was eventually sold in the 1950s, to the Rossdale Property Co. Their subsequent attempts at selling the land were just as fruitless as those before, and once again the property changed hands to the Mount Osmond Heights Pty Ltd. The land was newly subdivided, and it was in the late 1960s that finally much of Mount Osmond was sold to residential buyers. Fifty-two out of the 116 new sites had been sold by 12 October 1968 at an average of $3,500, according to the Adelaide daily The Advertiser. Since the brilliant land sales of that era, Mount Osmond has developed slowly because of the scarcity of land and the housing and development restrictions of the Hills Face Zone.[3] Now the suburb is home to large, extravagant, tree-filled houses and properties. With the upgrade of Mount Barker Road to the Adelaide-Crafers Highway (leading to the South Eastern Freeway) from 1997, Mount Osmond received its own freeway interchange as part of the development.

Panoramic view of Adelaide from Mount Osmond

Geography

Location of Mount Osmond in the Adelaide Metropolitan Area.

Mount Osmond is composed of the Mount itself and a ridge (Long Ridge) stretching out to the south-east between the valley of the South Eastern Freeway and that of Waterfall Gully. Much of the suburb is more than 300 metres above sea level, with the Mount Osmond peak itself (located in the Golf Course grounds near the club house) at 384 metres. Between the North-East and North-West are slopes leading down to the suburbs of Beaumont, Glen Osmond and Waterfall Gully, most of which is owned as public land by various government departments – either as parks, tracks or vacant land for possible future use. A somewhat "ring" of reserves exist on the slopes anti-clockwise from the Old Bullock Track to Mount Osmond Road near the freeway interchange. Cleland Conservation Park is responsible for maintaining the Mount Osmond Reserve, which is adjacent to the track that winds past the golf course on the east as the Pioneer Women's Heritage Trail.

Goats in a Mount Osmond Paddock

The Heritage Trail then becomes the Old Bullock/Long Ridge track as it continues along Long Ridge towards Eagle on the Hill. Much of the housing and residential properties are on the North-West side of the Mount, as to enable views over Adelaide. A few small settlements and paddocks with livestock (sheep, goats and deer) are still present on the slopes between the South Eastern Freeway and the Long Ridge Track.[4]

While the suburb still contains a notable amount of native vegetation, and has not been exposed to invasive introduced species like other areas have – much of it was originally cleared for grazing and has yet to grow back to the same extent. Before European Settlement Grey Box, SA Blue Gum, Sheoak, Manna Gum and River Red Gum trees were native to and grew in the area, particularly on the slopes leading down to the Adelaide Plains. [5] The Burnside Council is currently extending measures to control weeds in the Mount Osmond Reserves. A Volunteer Friends group has been formed to assist, and Kangaroo Grass and Grey Box trees are being planted.[6]

Transport

The Mount Osmond Interchange on the South Eastern Freeway. Mount Osmond Road can be seen winding up the hill on the right

Due to the suburb's relative isolation and hilly geography, it contains very few roads and does not conform to Adelaide's typical grid pattern – despite the suburb's age. The earliest road to be built was Mount Osmond Road, and done so by early developers in 1882 to make the suburb more attractive to prospective buyers. Mount Osmond Road remains one of two sealed roads which can today access Mount Osmond and is located to the South of the suburb. It begins as the first interchange on the South Eastern Freeway (formerly Mount Barker Road) and then winds around the Mount to the top of the mount and around the golf course. In the 19th century when a toll was in place for use of Mount Barker Road, drivers made use of Mount Osmond Road to avoid both the toll booth and the toll. The other sealed road that provides access to Mount Osmond is Hayward Drive, which starts in Beaumont and then winds around the hills to meet the rest of the suburb's road network.[7]

Numerous fire and walking tracks, among them the Old Bullock Track and the Pioneer Women's Heritage Trail, also access Mount Osmond from Waterfall Gully, Eagle on the Hill, Beaumont and Glen Osmond. Public Transport is provided by the Adelaide Metro, but no buses run through Mount Osmond itself. Stops can be found in neighbouring suburbs. The bikeway adjacent to the South Eastern Freeway winds past at the foot of Mount Osmond and can be accessed through the interchange.[8]

Residents

Percentages of the fifth of the population born abroad

In the 2001 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Housing, the population of the Mount Osmond census area[9] was 2,497 people, in an area of 6.08 square kilometres. Females outnumbered males 54.2% to 45.8%. Some 21.4% of the population was born overseas. The eight strongest religious affiliations in the area were (in descending order): Anglican, Catholic, Uniting, Lutheran, Orthodox Christian, Presbyterian, Baptist, Church of Christ, Buddhist and Islam. The three most common forms of dwelling were (in decreasing order): a separate house, a semi-detached house, and a flat or apartment. Mount Osmond residents are more affluent than the Adelaide average, with a high occurrence of incomes over AU$1,000 per week, which is also the second highest in the City of Burnside. A majority of workers are employed in professional or white collar fields.

The average age in Mount Osmond is increasing, though at a lesser rate than in Australia as a whole. Mount Osmond has the second highest proportion of under-18s in the City of Burnside and the second lowest number of couples without children. Family numbers are also stable (2.6) with only a 0.01% drop between the 1996 and 2001 censuses. Also of note is the high occurrence of religious affiliation (73%) in Mount Osmond in comparison to the Adelaide (and national) average. Christian affiliation (70%) is most prominent, with little growth in other religions.[10]

Attractions

Hayward Drive winding up into Mount Osmond over Adelaide

Mount Osmond contains a number of historical attractions; notably in the former mines and mining infrastructure that remains on the hillside as a reminder of its past. The mines continue up throughout the hills from Glen Osmond. While Wheal Gawler and Wheal Watkins are former open-cut mines (located in Glen Osmond), Mount Osmond contains more mineshafts which are up to sixty metres deep.[11] The Burnside Historical Society runs guided tours throughout (and underground into) the mines on the third Sunday of each month.[12] Mount Osmond Golf Course is located on the very top of the suburb, and includes its peak. Open only to members, the course's fairways and greens provide a spectacular backdrop of the Adelaide Plains, Mount Lofty Ranges and Golf St. Vincent to members and visitors. The English-Manor style clubrooms also cater to functions and special events.[13] Walking trails are abundant. While a historical walk through the mines can be taken from Beaumont or Glen Osmond, longer walks provide access to numerous attractions including Waterfall Gully's falls, the Cleland Wildlife Park and the Adelaide Hills town of Crafers. Walking the Long Ridge track, between the valley of the South Eastern Freeway and Waterfall Gully provides spectacular views of Adelaide. Mount Osmond also contains a small bed and breakfast, located on Mount Osmond Road.

Politics

2002 State Election[14]
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Liberal Liberal 67.5%
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Labor Labor 20%
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Democrats Democrats 7.5%
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Family First Family First 2.5%
  SA First 2.5%
2004 Federal Election[15]
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Liberal Liberal 67.5%
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Labor Labor 22.5%
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Greens Greens 7%
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Democrats Democrats 1.5%
Template:Australian politics/party colours/Family First Family First 1.5%

Mount Osmond could be categorised as a fairly socially conservative and economically liberal suburb. Many of its residents, being high-income earners, have benefited from the Coalition government's economic policies. The residents are primarily of British descent and show higher-than-average religious devotion. This fits in well with the demographic of a stereotypical Liberal Party voter. Consequently the Liberal Party polls very well in the area with over two-thirds of the vote in the last two elections. Progressive parties, such as the Labor Party and the Democrats (and more recently, the Greens) receive the majority of the remaining votes.

Mount Osmond is part of the state electoral district of Bragg, which has been held since 2002 by Liberal MP Vickie Chapman. In federal politics, the suburb is part of the division of Sturt, and has been represented by Christopher Pyne since 1993.[16] The results shown are from the closest polling station to Mount Osmond – which is located outside of the suburb – at St Saviour's Church Hall on Pridmore Road in Glen Osmond.

Notes

  1. ^ The Kaurna People, courtesy of the Aboriginal Catholic Ministry [17]
  2. ^ The Paddocks Beneath: A history of Burnside from the beginning, courtesy Elizabeth Warburton (published 1981)
  3. ^ Fairways on the Mount, courtesy Mount Osmond Golf Club (published 1977)
  4. ^ Walking Trails, courtesy of the City of Burnside [18]
  5. ^ Community Projects, courtesy Urban Forest [19]
  6. ^ Native Vegetation, courtesy of the City of Burnside [20]
  7. ^ Adelaide-Crafers Highway Route Information, courtesy South Australian Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure [21]
  8. ^ Australian Towns, Cities and Highways: South Eastern Freeway, courtesy of M. Greenslade [22]
  9. ^ Community Profile: Glen Osmond/Mount Osmond/Waterfall Gully/Leawood Gardens, courtesy ABS and the City of Burnside [23]
  10. ^ Glen Osmond Mines: Glen Osmond in the Adelaide Foothills, courtesy of Postcards and Channel Nine [24]
  11. ^ Glen Osmond Historical Walks, courtesy of the Burnside Historical Society [25]
  12. ^ Welcome to the Mount Osmond Golf Course, courtesy Mount Osmond Golf Club [26]
  13. ^ State Election 2002 - Polling Booth Results (Glen Osmond, Bragg), courtesy State Electoral Commission [27]
  14. ^ Federal Election 2004 - Polling Booth Results (Glen Osmond, Sturt), courtesy Australian Electoral Commission [28]
  15. ^ Burnside Electorates, courtesy of the City of Burnside [29]

References

  1. ^ Australian Bureau of Statistics (25 October 2007). "Mount Osmond (State Suburb)". 2006 Census QuickStats. Retrieved 2008-06-07.

External links