Jump to content

Dimensionless physical constant: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Introduction: Deleted comment that was might have been meant to be invisible.
template parameter change
 
(525 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{redirect|Fundamental physical constant}}
{{Short description|Physical constant with no units}}
In [[physics]], '''dimensionless''' or '''fundamental physical constants''' are, in the strictest sense, universal [[physical constant]]s that are independent of [[systems of units]] and hence are [[dimensionless quantities]]. However, the term may also refer (as in [http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ NIST]) to any dimensional universal [[physical constant]], such as the [[speed of light]], [[vacuum permittivity]], and the [[gravitational constant]].


In [[physics]], a '''dimensionless physical constant''' is a [[physical constant]] that is [[dimensionless quantity|dimensionless]], i.e. a pure number having no units attached and having a numerical value that is independent of whatever [[system of units]] may be used.<ref>Stroke, H. H., ed., ''The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years'' ([[Berlin]]/[[Heidelberg]]: [[Springer Science+Business Media|Springer]], 1995), [https://books.google.com/books?id=3U2HSMHsouMC&pg=PA525&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 525].</ref>
==Introduction==
While both [[mathematical constant]]s and fundamental physical constants are dimensionless, the latter are determined only by [[metrology|physical measurement]] and are not defined by any combination of pure mathematical constants.


The concept should not be confused with ''[[dimensionless number]]s'', that are not universally constant, and remain constant only for a particular phenomenon. In [[aerodynamics]] for example, if one considers one particular [[airfoil]], the [[Reynolds number]] value of the [[laminar–turbulent transition]] is one relevant dimensionless number of the problem. However, it is strictly related to the particular problem: for example, it is related to the airfoil being considered and also to the type of fluid in which it moves.
Physicists try to make their theories simpler and more elegant by reducing the number of physical constants appearing in the mathematical expression of physical theory. They do this by defining the units of measurement in such a way that a number of common physical constants, such as the speed of light, are normalized to unity. The resulting system of units, known as [[natural units]], has a fair following in the literature on advanced physics because it considerably simplifies many equations. When [[physical quantities]] are measured in terms of natural units, those quantities become dimensionless.


The term '''fundamental physical constant''' is sometimes used to refer to some {{em|universal}} dimensionless constants. Perhaps the best-known example is the [[fine-structure constant]], ''α'', which has an approximate value of {{sfrac|1|{{physconst|alphainv|round=3|ref=no}}}}.<ref>Vértes, A., Nagy, S., Klencsár, Z., Lovas, R. G., & Rösch, F., eds., ''Handbook of Nuclear Chemistry'', (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2011), [https://books.google.com/books?id=NQyF6KaUScQC&pg=PA367&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 367].</ref>
Certain physical constants, however, are dimensionless numbers which cannot be eliminated in this way. Hence their values must be ascertained experimentally. Perhaps the best known example is the [[fine structure constant]],


== Terminology ==
:<math> \alpha = \frac{e^2}{\hbar c \ 4 \pi \epsilon_0} = \frac{1}{137.03599911} , </math>
It has been argued the term ''fundamental physical constant'' should be restricted to the dimensionless universal physical constants that currently cannot be derived from any other source;<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html|title=How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?|last=Baez|first=John|date=2011-04-22|website=math.ucr.edu|access-date=2018-04-13}}</ref><ref>{{Cite arXiv|last=Rich|first=James|date=2013-04-02|title=Dimensionless constants and cosmological measurements|eprint=1304.0577|class=astro-ph.CO}}</ref><ref name="hep-th1412.2040">{{cite journal|author=Michael Duff |title=How fundamental are fundamental constants?|journal=Contemporary Physics |arxiv=1412.2040|year=2014|volume=56 |issue=1 |pages=35–47 |doi=10.1080/00107514.2014.980093|bibcode=2015ConPh..56...35D |s2cid=118347723 |author-link=Michael Duff (physicist)}}</ref><ref>{{cite arXiv |last1=Duff |first1=M. J. |date=13 August 2002 |title=Comment on time-variation of fundamental constants |eprint=hep-th/0208093}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Duff |first1=M. J. |last2=Okun |first2=L. B. |last3=Veneziano |first3=G. |title=Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants |journal=[[Journal of High Energy Physics]] |date=2002 |volume=2002 |issue= 3|pages=023 |arxiv=physics/0110060 |bibcode=2002JHEP...03..023D |doi=10.1088/1126-6708/2002/03/023|s2cid=15806354 }}</ref> this stricter definition is followed here.


However, the term ''fundamental physical constant'' has also been used occasionally to refer to certain universal dimensioned [[physical constant]]s, such as the [[speed of light]] ''c'', [[vacuum permittivity]] ''ε''<sub>0</sub>, [[Planck constant]] ''h'', and the [[Newtonian constant of gravitation]] ''G'', that appear in the most basic theories of physics.<ref name=":0" /><ref>http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ NIST</ref><ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/physical-constant|title=Physical constant|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Britannica|access-date=2018-04-13|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Karshenboim|first=Savely G.|date=August 2005|title=Fundamental Physical Constants: Looking from Different Angles|journal=[[Canadian Journal of Physics]]|volume=83|issue=8|pages=767–811|doi=10.1139/p05-047|issn=0008-4204|arxiv=physics/0506173|bibcode=2005CaJPh..83..767K|s2cid=475086}}</ref> [[National Institute of Standards and Technology|NIST]]<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/introduction.html|title=Introduction to the Fundamental Physical Constants|website=physics.nist.gov|access-date=2018-04-13}}</ref> and [[Committee on Data for Science and Technology|CODATA]]<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Mohr|first1=Peter J.|last2=Newell|first2=David B.|last3=Taylor|first3=Barry N.|date=2016-09-26|title=CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2014|journal=Reviews of Modern Physics|volume=88|issue=3|pages=035009|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035009|issn=0034-6861|arxiv=1507.07956|bibcode=2016RvMP...88c5009M|s2cid=1115862}}
where <math>e \ </math> is the [[elementary charge]], <math>\hbar \ </math> is the reduced [[Planck's constant]], <math>c \ </math> is the [[speed of light]] in a vacuum, and <math> \epsilon_0 \ </math> is the [[permittivity of free space]]. In simple terms, the fine structure constant determines how strong the electromagnetic force is. There is no accepted theory of why <math> \alpha </math> has the value it does. The analog of the fine structure constant for gravitation is the [[gravitational coupling constant]].
</ref> sometimes used the term in this less strict manner.


== Characteristics ==
A long-sought goal of theoretical physics is to find first principles from which some or all of the dimensionless constant can be calculated instead of being empirically estimated. The reduction of chemistry to physics was an enormous step in this direction, since properties of atoms and molecules can now be calculated from the Standard Model, at least in principle. The list of fundamental physical constants increases when experiments measure new relationships between physical phenomena. The list decreases when [[physical theory]] advances and shows how some previously fundamental constant can be computed in terms of others. A successful [[Grand Unified Theory]] or [[Theory of Everything]] might yield a further reduction in the number of fundamental constants, ideally to zero. However, this goal remains elusive.
There is no exhaustive list of such constants but it does make sense to ask about the minimal number of fundamental constants necessary to determine a given physical theory. Thus, the [[Standard Model]] requires 25 physical constants. About half of them are the [[mass]]es of [[fundamental particle]]s, which become "dimensionless" when expressed relative to the [[Planck mass]] or, alternatively, as coupling strength with the Higgs field along with the [[gravitational constant]].<ref>Kuntz, I., ''Gravitational Theories Beyond General Relativity'', (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2019), [https://books.google.com/books?id=xrWZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA58&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false pp. 58–61].</ref>


Fundamental physical constants cannot be derived and have to be [[metrology|measured]]. Developments in physics may lead to either a reduction or an extension of their number: discovery of new particles, or new relationships between physical phenomena, would introduce new constants, while the development of a more fundamental theory might allow the derivation of several constants from a more fundamental constant.
==The Standard Model==
According to [[Michio Kaku]] (1994: 124-27), the [[Standard Model]] of particle physics contains nineteen arbitrary ''dimensionless'' constants that describe the masses of the particles and the strengths of the various interactions. This was before it was discovered that [[neutrino]]s can have nonzero mass, and his list includes a quantity called the [[theta angle]] which seems to be zero. After the discovery of neutrino mass, and leaving out the theta angle, [http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html John Baez] (2002) noted that the new [[Standard Model]] requires twenty-five arbitrary fundamental constants, namely the:
* [[Fine structure constant]];
* [[Strong coupling constant]];
* [[Mass]]es of the [[fundamental particle]]s (represented in terms of the [[Planck mass]] or some other [[natural unit]] of mass), namely the six [[quark]]s, the six [[lepton]]s, the [[Higgs boson]], the [[W boson]] and the [[Z boson]];
* Four parameters of the [[CKM matrix]], which describe how [[quark]]s oscillate between different forms;
* Four parameters of the [[Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix]], which does the same thing for [[neutrino]]s.


A long-sought goal of theoretical physics is to find first principles ([[theory of everything]]) from which all of the fundamental dimensionless constants can be calculated and compared to the measured values.
[[Gravity]] requires one more fundamental constant, namely the:
* [[cosmological constant]] of [[Einstein field equation|Einstein's equations]] for [[general relativity]].


The large number of fundamental constants required in the Standard Model has been regarded as unsatisfactory since the theory's formulation in the 1970s. The desire for a theory that would allow the calculation of particle masses is a core motivation for the search for "[[Physics beyond the Standard Model]]".
This makes for a current total of 26 dimensionless fundamental physical constants. More constants presumably await discovery, to describe the properties of [[dark matter]]. If the description of [[dark energy]] turns out to be more complicated than can be modelled by the [[cosmological constant]], yet more constants will be needed.


==Martin Rees's 6 Numbers==
== History ==
In the 1920s and 1930s, [[Arthur Eddington]] embarked upon extensive mathematical investigation into the relations between the fundamental quantities in basic physical theories, later used as part of his effort to construct an [[Quantum cosmology|overarching theory unifying quantum mechanics and cosmological physics]]. For example, he speculated on the potential consequences of the ratio of the [[Classical electron radius|electron radius]] to its [[Electron rest mass|mass]]. Most notably, in a 1929 paper he set out an argument based on the [[Pauli exclusion principle]] and the [[Dirac equation]] that fixed the value of the reciprocal of the fine-structure constant as 𝛼<sup>−1</sup> = 16 + {{sfrac|1|2}} × 16 × (16 − 1) = '''136'''. When its value was discovered to be closer to 137, he changed his argument to match that value. His ideas were not widely accepted, and subsequent experiments have shown that they were wrong (for example, none of the measurements of the fine-structure constant suggest an integer value; the modern [[CODATA]] value is {{physconst|alphainv|symbol=yes|after=.}}
In his book ''Just Six Numbers'', [[Sir Martin Rees]] mulls over the following numbers, which he considers fundamental to physical theory:
* &nu;, Nu: the ratio of the [[coupling constant]]s for the [[electroweak]] force and [[gravitation]] (circa 10<sup>43</sup>). The former is simply the [[fine structure constant]], while the latter is the [[gravitational coupling constant]];
* &epsilon;, Epsilon: related to the [[strong force]];
* &omega;, Omega: the number of [[electron]]s and [[proton]]s in the observable universe (circa 10<sup>80</sup>);
* &lambda;, Lambda: the [[cosmological constant]];
* Q: a ratio of fundamental energies;
* &delta;, Delta: the number of spatial [[dimension]]s.


Though his derivations and equations were unfounded, Eddington was the first physicist to recognize the significance of universal dimensionless constants, now considered among the most critical components of major physical theories such as the [[Standard Model]] and [[Lambda-CDM model|ΛCDM cosmology]].<ref>[[:fr:Dina K. Prialnik|Prialnik, D. K.]], ''An Introduction to the Theory of Stellar Structure and Evolution'' ([[Cambridge]]: [[Cambridge University Press]], 2000), [https://books.google.com/books?id=TGyzlVbgkiMC&pg=PA82&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 82].</ref> He was also the first to argue for the importance of the [[cosmological constant]] Λ itself, considering it vital for explaining the [[expansion of the universe]], at a time when most physicists (including its discoverer, [[Albert Einstein]]) considered it an outright mistake or mathematical artifact and assumed a value of zero: this at least proved prescient, and a significant positive Λ features prominently in ΛCDM.
Since Delta must be a nonzero natural number (apparently 3) and is a quantity that we cannot measure, most physicists would not deem it a dimensionless physical constant of the sort discussed in this entry. There are also a number of physical and mathematical reasons, discussed in the entry [[spacetime]], why Delta is 3.


Eddington may have been the first to attempt in vain to derive the basic dimensionless constants from fundamental theories and equations, but he was certainly not the last. Many others would subsequently undertake similar endeavors, and efforts occasionally continue even today. None have yet produced convincing results or gained wide acceptance among theoretical physicists.<ref>{{Cite arXiv|last=Kragh|first=Helge|author-link=Helge Kragh|date=2015-10-14|title=On Arthur Eddington's Theory of Everything|eprint=1510.04046|class=physics.hist-ph}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Gamow|first=G.|date=1968-02-01|title=Numerology of the Constants of Nature|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences| language=en|volume=59| issue=2|pages=313–318| doi=10.1073/pnas.59.2.313| issn=0027-8424|pmid=16591598| pmc=224670|bibcode=1968PNAS...59..313G|doi-access=free}}</ref>
These 6 constants constrain any plausible fundamental physical theory, which must either be able to derive their values from the mathematics of the theory, or accept them as empirical and arbitrary. The question then arises: how many values of these constants result from purely mathematical considerations, and how many represent [[degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)|degrees of freedom]] for possible valid physical theories, only some of which are possible in a [[fine-tuned universe|universe]], such as ours, with intelligent observers? This leads to a number of interesting possibilities, including the possibility of [[Multiverse (science)|multiple universes]], each with different values of these constants. Multiple universes give rise to [[selection effects]] and the [[anthropic principle]].


An [[Koide formula|empirical relation]] between the masses of the electron, muon and tau has been discovered by physicist [[Yoshio Koide]], but this formula remains unexplained.<ref>{{cite arXiv |last1=Rivero |first1=A. |last2=Gsponer |first2=A. |title=The strange formula of Dr. Koide |date=February 2, 2008 |page=4 |eprint=hep-ph/0505220 }}</ref>
==Other==
The mathematician [[Simon Plouffe]] has made an extensive search of computer databases of mathematical formulae, seeking formulae giving the mass ratios of the [[fundamental particles]].


== Examples ==
The study of the fundamental constants sometimes has bordered on [[numerology]]. For instance, the physicist [[Arthur Eddington]] argued that for several mathematical reasons, the fine structure constant had to be ''exactly'' 1/136. When its value was discovered to be closer to 1/137, he changed his argument to match that value. Experiments since his day have shown that his arguments are still wrong; the constant is about 1/137.036.
Dimensionless fundamental physical constants include:
* ''α'', the [[fine-structure constant]], (≈&nbsp;{{sfrac|1|137}}). This is also the square of the [[elementary charge|electron charge]], expressed in [[Planck units]], which defines the scale of charge of [[elementary particle]]s with charge. The electron charge is the [[coupling constant]] for the [[electromagnetic interaction]].
* ''μ'' or ''β'', the [[proton-to-electron mass ratio]] (≈&nbsp;{{physconst|mp/me|round=0|ref=no}}), the [[rest mass]] of the [[proton]] divided by that of the [[electron]]. More generally, the ratio of the [[rest mass]]es of any pair of [[elementary particle]]s.
* ''α''<sub>s</sub>, the [[coupling constant]] for the [[strong force]] (≈&nbsp;1)

=== Fine-structure constant ===
One of the dimensionless fundamental constants is the [[fine-structure constant]]:
: <math> \alpha = \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 \ \hbar c}= \frac{e^2}{2 \varepsilon_0 h c} = </math> {{physconst|alpha|ref=no}},
where ''e'' is the [[elementary charge]], ''ħ'' is the reduced [[Planck constant]], ''c'' is the [[speed of light]] in vacuum, and ''ε''<sub>0</sub> is the [[permittivity of free space]]. The fine-structure constant is fixed to the strength of the [[electromagnetic force]]. At low energies, ''α'' ≈ {{sfrac|1|137}}, whereas at the scale of the [[Z boson]], about {{val|90|ul=GeV}}, one measures ''α'' ≈ {{sfrac|1|127}}. There is no accepted theory explaining the value of ''α''; [[Richard Feynman]] elaborates:

{{quote
| There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant, ''e''{{snd}} the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. (My physicist friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with about an uncertainty of about 2 in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.) Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling comes from: is it related to pi or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms? Nobody knows. It's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!
| {{Cite book
|author=Richard P. Feynman
|author-link=Richard Feynman
|year=1985
|title=QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter
|publisher=[[Princeton University Press]]
|page=129
|isbn=978-0-691-08388-9
|title-link=QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter
}}
}}

=== Standard Model ===
The original [[Standard Model]] of [[particle physics]] from the [[1970s]] contained 19 fundamental dimensionless constants describing the [[mass]]es of the particles and the strengths of the [[electroweak]] and [[strong force]]s. In the 1990s, [[neutrino]]s were discovered to have nonzero mass, and a quantity called the [[theta vacuum|vacuum angle]] was found to be indistinguishable from zero.{{cn|date=June 2022}}

The complete [[Standard Model]] requires 25 fundamental dimensionless constants ([https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html Baez, 2011]). At present, their numerical values are not understood in terms of any widely accepted theory and are determined only from measurement. These 25 constants are:
* the [[fine structure constant]];
* the [[coupling constant|strong coupling constant]];
* fifteen [[mass]]es of the [[fundamental particle]]s (relative to the [[Planck mass]] ''m''<sub>P</sub> = {{val|1.22089|(6)|e=19|u=GeV/c2}}), namely:
** six [[quark]]s
** six [[lepton]]s
** the [[Higgs boson]]
** the [[W boson]]
** the [[Z boson]]
* four parameters of the [[Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix|CKM matrix]], describing how [[quark]]s oscillate between different forms;
* four parameters of the [[Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix]], which does the same thing for [[neutrino]]s.

{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"
! colspan="4" | Dimensionless constants of the Standard Model
|-
! Symbol
! Description
! Dimensionless value
! Alternative value representation
|-
| ''m''<sub>u</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| [[Up quark|up quark mass]]
| {{val|1.4e-22}} – {{val|2.7e-22}}
| 1.7–3.3 MeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''m''<sub>d</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| [[Down quark|down quark mass]]
| {{val|3.4e-22}} – {{val|4.8e-22}}
| 4.1–5.8 MeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''m''<sub>c</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| [[Charm quark|charm quark mass]]
| {{val|1.04431|0.0204768|0.0286675|e=-19}}
| {{Val|1.275|0.025|0.035|u=GeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>}}
|-
| ''m''<sub>s</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| [[Strange quark|strange quark mass]]
| {{val|8.27e-21}}
| {{Val|95|9|3|u=MeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>}}
|-
| ''m''<sub>t</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| [[Top quark|top quark mass]]
| {{val|1.415|0.00245721|e=-17}}
| {{val|172.76|0.3|u=GeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>}}
|-
| ''m''<sub>b</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| [[Bottom quark|bottom quark mass]]
| {{val|3.43e-19}}
| 4.19 GeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''θ''<sub>12,CKM</sub>
| [[Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix|CKM 12-mixing angle]]
| {{val|0.22759|0.000873}}
| {{val|13.04|0.05|u=°}}
|-
| ''θ''<sub>23,CKM</sub>
| [[Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix|CKM 23-mixing angle]]
| {{val|0.04154|0.00105}}
| {{val|2.38|0.06|u=°}}
|-
| ''θ''<sub>13,CKM</sub>
| [[Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix|CKM 13-mixing angle]]
| {{val|0.003508|0.000192}}
| {{val|0.201|0.011|u=°}}
|-
| ''δ''<sub>13,CKM</sub>
| [[Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix|CKM]] [[CP violation|CP-violating phase]]
| {{val|1.201|0.0785}}
| {{val|68.8|4.5|u=°}}
|-
| ''m''<sub>e</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| electron mass
| {{val|4.18546e-23}}
| {{physconst|mec2_MeV|round=3|ref=no}}/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''m''<sub>ν<sub>e</sub></sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| electron neutrino mass
| below {{val|9e-30}}
| below 0.11 eV/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''m''<sub>μ</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| muon mass
| {{val|8.65418e-21}}
| {{physconst|mmuc2_MeV|round=1|ref=no}}/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''m''<sub>ν<sub>μ</sub></sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| muon neutrino mass
| below {{val|1.6e-28}}
| below 2 eV/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''m''<sub>τ</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| tau mass
| {{val|1.45535e-19}}
| 1.78 GeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''m''<sub>ν<sub>τ</sub></sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| tau neutrino mass
| below {{val|1.6e-28}}
| below 2 eV/''c''<sup>2</sup>
|-
| ''θ''<sub>12,PMNS</sub>
| [[Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix|PMNS 12-mixing angle]]
| {{val|0.58364|0.0122}}
| {{val|33.44|0.77|0.74|u=°}}
|-
| ''θ''<sub>23,PMNS</sub>
| [[Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix|PMNS 23-mixing angle]]
| {{val|0.8587|0.0175|0.0227}}
| {{val|49.2|1.0|1.3|u=°}}
|-
| ''θ''<sub>13,PMNS</sub>
| [[Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix|PMNS 13-mixing angle]]
| {{val|0.1496|0.00227|0.00209}}
| {{val|8.57|0.13|0.12|u=°}}
|-
| ''δ''<sub>Cp,PMNS</sub>
| [[Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix|PMNS]] [[CP violation|CP-violating phase]]
| 2.95 ≤ ''δ'' ≤ 4.294
| 169° ≤ ''δ'' ≤ 246°
|-
| ''α''
| [[fine-structure constant]]
| {{physconst|alpha|round=8|ref=no}}
| 1 / {{physconst|alphainv|round=3|ref=no}}
|-
| ''α''<sub>s</sub>
| [[Coupling constant|strong coupling constant]]
| ≈ 1
| ≈ 1
|-
| ''m''<sub>W<sup>±</sup></sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| W boson mass
| {{val|6.5841|0.0012|e=-18}}
| {{val|80.385|0.015|u=GeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>}}
|-
| ''m''<sub>Z<sup>0</sup></sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| Z boson mass
| {{val|7.46888|0.00016|e=-18}}
| {{val|91.1876|0.002|u=GeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>}}
|-
| ''m''<sub>H</sub> / ''m''<sub>P</sub>
| Higgs boson mass
| ≈ {{val|1.02e-17}}
| {{val|125.09|0.24|u=GeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>}}
|}

=== Cosmological constants ===
The [[cosmological constant]], which can be thought of as the density of [[dark energy]] in the universe, is a fundamental constant in [[physical cosmology]] that has a dimensionless value of approximately 10<sup>−122</sup>.<ref>[[Robert Jaffe|Jaffe, R. L.]], & Taylor, W., ''The Physics of Energy'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), [https://books.google.com/books?id=drZDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA419&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 419].</ref> Other dimensionless constants are the measure of homogeneity in the universe, denoted by ''Q'', which is explained below by Martin Rees, the baryon mass per photon, the cold dark matter mass per photon and the neutrino mass per photon.<ref name="Tegmark2014">{{cite book |first=Max |last=Tegmark |date=2014 |title=Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality |publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group |isbn=9780307599803 |page=[https://archive.org/details/ourmathematicalu0000tegm/page/252 252] |title-link=Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality }}</ref>

=== Barrow and Tipler ===
Barrow and Tipler (1986) anchor their broad-ranging discussion of [[astrophysics]], [[cosmology]], [[quantum physics]], [[teleology]], and the [[anthropic principle]] in the [[fine-structure constant]], the [[proton-to-electron mass ratio]] (which they, along with Barrow (2002), call β), and the [[coupling constant]]s for the [[strong force]] and [[gravitation]].

=== Martin Rees's 'six numbers' ===
[[Martin Rees, Baron Rees of Ludlow|Martin Rees]], in his book ''Just Six Numbers'',<ref>Radford, T., [https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jun/08/just-six-numbers-martin-rees-review "''Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe'' by Martin Rees—review"], ''[[The Guardian]]'', June 8, 2012.</ref> mulls over the following six dimensionless constants, whose values he deems fundamental to present-day physical theory and the known structure of the universe:
* ''N'' ≈ 10<sup>36</sup>: the ratio of the electrostatic and the gravitational forces between two [[proton]]s. This ratio is denoted ''α''/''α''<sub>G</sub> in Barrow and Tipler (1986). ''N'' governs the relative importance of gravity and electrostatic attraction/repulsion in explaining the properties of [[baryonic matter]];<ref name="Rees, M. 2000, p">Rees, M. (2000)</ref>
* ''ε'' ≈ 0.007: The fraction of the mass of four [[proton]]s that is released as energy when [[nuclear fusion|fused]] into a [[helium]] nucleus. ''ε'' governs the [[Proton–proton chain reaction#Energy release|energy output of stars]], and is determined by the [[coupling constant]] for the [[strong force]];<ref>Rees, M. (2000), p. 53.</ref>
* Ω ≈ 0.3: the [[Friedmann equations#Density parameter|ratio of the actual density of the universe to the critical (minimum) density]] required for the [[universe]] to eventually collapse under its gravity. Ω determines the [[ultimate fate of the universe]]. If {{nowrap|Ω ≥ 1}}, the universe may experience a [[Big Crunch]]. If {{nowrap|Ω < 1}}, the universe may expand forever;<ref name="Rees, M. 2000, p"/>
* ''λ'' ≈ 0.7: The ratio of the energy density of the universe, due to the [[cosmological constant]], to the [[Critical density (cosmology)|critical density]] of the universe. Others denote this ratio by <math>\Omega_{\Lambda}</math>;<ref>Rees, M. (2000), p. 110.</ref>
* ''Q'' ≈ 10<sup>−5</sup>: The energy required to break up and disperse an instance of the largest known structures in the universe, namely a [[galactic cluster]] or [[supercluster]], expressed as a fraction of the energy equivalent to the [[rest mass]] ''m'' of that structure, namely ''mc''<sup>2</sup>;<ref>Rees, M. (2000), p. 118.</ref>
* ''D'' = 3: the number of macroscopic spatial [[dimension]]s.

''N'' and ''ε'' govern the [[fundamental interaction]]s of physics. The other constants (''D'' excepted) govern the [[size of the universe|size]], [[age of the universe|age]], and expansion of the universe. These five constants must be estimated empirically. ''D'', on the other hand, is necessarily a nonzero natural number and does not have an uncertainty. Hence most physicists would not deem it a dimensionless physical constant of the sort discussed in this entry.

Any plausible fundamental physical theory must be consistent with these six constants, and must either derive their values from the mathematics of the theory, or accept their values as empirical.


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix]] (Cabibbo angle)
* [[Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix]] ([[Cabibbo angle]])
* [[Dimensionless numbers in fluid mechanics]]
* [[coupling constant]]
* [[Dirac large numbers hypothesis]]
* [[Fine-structure constant]]
* [[gravitational coupling constant]]
* [[Neutrino oscillation]]
* [[Neutrino oscillation]]
* [[Physical cosmology]]
* [[Physical cosmology]]
* [[Standard Model]]
* [[Standard Model]]
* [[Weinberg angle]]
* [[Weinberg angle]]
* [[Fine-tuned universe]]
* [[Koide formula]]


== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist|30em}}
* [[John D. Barrow]], 2002. ''The Constants of Nature; From Alpha to Omega - The Numbers that Encode the Deepest Secrets of the Universe''. Pantheon Books. ISBN 0-375-42221-8.
* [[John D. Barrow]] and [[Frank J. Tipler]], 1986. ''[[anthropic principle|The Anthropic Cosmological Principle]]''. Oxford Univ. Press.
* [[Michio Kaku]], 1994. ''[[Hyperspace (book)|Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the Tenth Dimension]]''. [[Oxford University Press]].
* [[Martin Rees]], 1999. ''Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe''. London: Phoenix. ISBN 0-7538-1022-0


== Bibliography ==
==External articles==
* [[Martin Rees]], 1999. ''Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe''. [[London]]: [[Weidenfeld & Nicolson]]. {{ISBN|0-7538-1022-0}}
;General
* Josef Kuneš, 2012. [https://books.google.com/books?id=_jqUZIUXZBsC ''Dimensionless Physical Quantities in Science and Engineering'']. [[Amsterdam]]: [[Elsevier]]. {{ISBN|978-0-12-416013-2}}

== External articles ==
; General :
* {{citation |author=John Barrow |author-link=John D. Barrow |year=2002 |title=The Constants of Nature; From Alpha to Omega{{snd}} The Numbers that Encode the Deepest Secrets of the Universe |publisher=Pantheon Books |isbn=0-375-42221-8 }}
* {{BarrowTipler1986}}
* {{citation |author=Michio Kaku |author-link=Michio Kaku |year=1994 |title=Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the Tenth Dimension |title-link=Hyperspace (book) |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] }}
* [http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ Fundamental Physical Constants from NIST]
* [http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ Fundamental Physical Constants from NIST]
*[http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/Table/allascii.txt Values of fundamental constants.] [[CODATA]], 2002.
* [http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/Table/allascii.txt Values of fundamental constants.] [[CODATA]], 2002.
* [[John Baez]], 2002, "[http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?]".
* [[John Baez]], 2002, "[http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?]"
* Plouffe. Simon, 2004, "[http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/%7Eplouffe/Search.htm A search for a mathematical expression for mass ratios using a large database.]"
* Simon Plouffe, 2004, "[http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/%7Eplouffe/Search.htm A search for a mathematical expression for mass ratios using a large database.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070219210717/http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/%7Eplouffe/Search.htm |date=2007-02-19 }}"
* Sheppard, M. R., 2007, "[http://www.msu.edu/~sheppa28/constants.html Systematic Search for Expressions of Dimensionless Constants using the NIST database of Physical Constants.]"


;Do the fundamental constants vary?
; Articles on variance of the fundamental constants :
* {{cite journal | last1=Bahcall | first1=John N. |author-link=John N. Bahcall| last2=Steinhardt | first2=Charles L. | last3=Schlegel | first3=David | title=Does the Fine‐Structure Constant Vary with Cosmological Epoch? | journal=The Astrophysical Journal | volume=600 | issue=2 | date=2004-01-10 | issn=0004-637X | doi=10.1086/379971 | pages=520–543|arxiv=astro-ph/0301507| bibcode=2004ApJ...600..520B | s2cid=8875571 }}
* [[John Bahcall]], Steinhardt, Charles L., and Schlegel, David, 2004, "[http://www.arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0301507 Does the fine-structure constant vary with cosmological epoch?]" ''Astrophys. J. 600'': 520.
* [[John Barrow]] and Webb, J. K., "[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=0005BFE6-2965-128A-A96583414B7F0000 Inconstant Constants - Do the inner workings of nature change with time?]" ''Scientific American'' (June 2005).
* [[John D. Barrow]] and Webb, J. K., "[https://web.archive.org/web/20060328234713/http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=0005BFE6-2965-128A-A96583414B7F0000 Inconstant Constants Do the inner workings of nature change with time?]" ''Scientific American'' (June 2005).
*Marion, H., et al. 2003, "[http://arXiv.org/abs/physics/0212112 A search for variations of fundamental constants using atomic fountain clocks,]" ''Phys.Rev.Lett. 90'': 150801.
* [[Michael Duff (physicist)|Michael Duff]], 2002 "[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208093 Comment on time-variation of fundamental constants.]"
* {{cite journal | last1=Marion | first1=H. | last2=Pereira Dos Santos | first2=F. | last3=Abgrall | first3=M. | last4=Zhang | first4=S. | last5=Sortais | first5=Y. | last6=Bize | first6=S. | last7=Maksimovic | first7=I. | last8=Calonico | first8=D. | last9=Grünert | first9=J. | last10=Mandache | first10=C. | last11=Lemonde | first11=P. | last12=Santarelli | first12=G. | last13=Laurent | first13=Ph. | last14=Clairon | first14=A. | last15=Salomon | first15=C. |display-authors=5| title=Search for Variations of Fundamental Constants using Atomic Fountain Clocks | journal=Physical Review Letters | volume=90 | issue=15 | date=2003-04-18 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.90.150801 | pmid=12732023 | page=150801| bibcode=2003PhRvL..90o0801M | arxiv=physics/0212112 | s2cid=20986115 }}
*Martins, J.A.P. et al., 2004, "[http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0302295C WMAP constraints on varying α and the promise of reionization,]" ''Phys.Lett. B585'': 29-34.
* {{cite journal | last1=Martins | first1=C.J.A.P | last2=Melchiorri | first2=A | last3=Rocha | first3=G | last4=Trotta | first4=R | last5=Avelino | first5=P.P | last6=Viana | first6=P.T.P | title=WMAP constraints on varying α and the promise of reionization | journal=Physics Letters B | volume=585 | issue=1–2 | year=2004 | issn=0370-2693 | doi=10.1016/j.physletb.2003.11.080 | pages=29–34|arxiv=astro-ph/0302295| bibcode=2004PhLB..585...29M | s2cid=113017 }}
*Olive, K.A., et al., 2002, "[http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0205269 Constraints on the variations of the fundamental couplings,]" ''Phys.Rev. D66'': 045022.
* {{cite journal | last1=Olive | first1=Keith A. |author1-link=Keith Olive| last2=Pospelov | first2=Maxim | last3=Qian | first3=Yong-Zhong | last4=Coc | first4=Alain | last5=Cassé | first5=Michel | last6=Vangioni-Flam | first6=Elisabeth | title=Constraints on the variations of the fundamental couplings | journal=Physical Review D | volume=66 | issue=4 | date=2002-08-23 | issn=0556-2821 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.66.045022 | page=045022|arxiv=hep-ph/0205269| bibcode=2002PhRvD..66d5022O | s2cid=43436585 }}
*Uzan, J-P, 2003, "[http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0205340 The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations,]" ''Rev.Mod.Phys. 75'': 403.
* {{cite journal | last=Uzan | first=Jean-Philippe |author-link=:fr:Jean-Philippe Uzan| title=The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status | journal=Reviews of Modern Physics | volume=75 | issue=2 | date=2003-04-07 | issn=0034-6861 | doi=10.1103/revmodphys.75.403 | pages=403–455|arxiv=hep-ph/0205340| bibcode=2003RvMP...75..403U | s2cid=118684485 }}
*Wandelt, Ben, "[http://2physics.blogspot.com/2007/07/changing-constants-dark-energy-and.html Changing Constants, Dark Energy and the Absorption of 21cm Radiation,]" ''2Physics.com'', July 25, 2007.
* {{cite journal | last1=Webb | first1=J. K. | last2=Murphy | first2=M. T. | last3=Flambaum | first3=V. V. | last4=Dzuba | first4=V. A. | last5=Barrow | first5=J. D. | last6=Churchill | first6=C. W. | last7=Prochaska | first7=J. X. | last8=Wolfe | first8=A. M. |authorlink8=Arthur M. Wolfe| title=Further Evidence for Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant | journal=Physical Review Letters | volume=87 | issue=9 | date=2001-08-09 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.87.091301 | pmid=11531558 | page=091301|arxiv=astro-ph/0012539| bibcode=2001PhRvL..87i1301W | s2cid=40461557 }}
* Webb, J.K. et al., 2001, "Further evidence for cosmological evolution of the fine-structure constant," ''Phys. Rev. Lett. 87'': 091301.

==External links==
* Murphy, Michael, [http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~mmurphy/res.html Web page] at the [[Swinburne University of Technology]], Australia.
* Webb, John K., [http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/ACADEMIC/webb.html Web page] at the [[University of New South Wales]], Australia.


[[Category:Fundamental constants| ]]
[[Category:Fundamental constants| ]]
[[Category:Dimensionless constants]]

[[es:Constante física fundamental]]
[[fr:Constante fondamentale]]
[[pt:Constante fundamental]]

Latest revision as of 17:29, 7 June 2024

In physics, a dimensionless physical constant is a physical constant that is dimensionless, i.e. a pure number having no units attached and having a numerical value that is independent of whatever system of units may be used.[1]

The concept should not be confused with dimensionless numbers, that are not universally constant, and remain constant only for a particular phenomenon. In aerodynamics for example, if one considers one particular airfoil, the Reynolds number value of the laminar–turbulent transition is one relevant dimensionless number of the problem. However, it is strictly related to the particular problem: for example, it is related to the airfoil being considered and also to the type of fluid in which it moves.

The term fundamental physical constant is sometimes used to refer to some universal dimensionless constants. Perhaps the best-known example is the fine-structure constant, α, which has an approximate value of 1/137.036.[2]

Terminology[edit]

It has been argued the term fundamental physical constant should be restricted to the dimensionless universal physical constants that currently cannot be derived from any other source;[3][4][5][6][7] this stricter definition is followed here.

However, the term fundamental physical constant has also been used occasionally to refer to certain universal dimensioned physical constants, such as the speed of light c, vacuum permittivity ε0, Planck constant h, and the Newtonian constant of gravitation G, that appear in the most basic theories of physics.[8][9][10][11] NIST[8] and CODATA[12] sometimes used the term in this less strict manner.

Characteristics[edit]

There is no exhaustive list of such constants but it does make sense to ask about the minimal number of fundamental constants necessary to determine a given physical theory. Thus, the Standard Model requires 25 physical constants. About half of them are the masses of fundamental particles, which become "dimensionless" when expressed relative to the Planck mass or, alternatively, as coupling strength with the Higgs field along with the gravitational constant.[13]

Fundamental physical constants cannot be derived and have to be measured. Developments in physics may lead to either a reduction or an extension of their number: discovery of new particles, or new relationships between physical phenomena, would introduce new constants, while the development of a more fundamental theory might allow the derivation of several constants from a more fundamental constant.

A long-sought goal of theoretical physics is to find first principles (theory of everything) from which all of the fundamental dimensionless constants can be calculated and compared to the measured values.

The large number of fundamental constants required in the Standard Model has been regarded as unsatisfactory since the theory's formulation in the 1970s. The desire for a theory that would allow the calculation of particle masses is a core motivation for the search for "Physics beyond the Standard Model".

History[edit]

In the 1920s and 1930s, Arthur Eddington embarked upon extensive mathematical investigation into the relations between the fundamental quantities in basic physical theories, later used as part of his effort to construct an overarching theory unifying quantum mechanics and cosmological physics. For example, he speculated on the potential consequences of the ratio of the electron radius to its mass. Most notably, in a 1929 paper he set out an argument based on the Pauli exclusion principle and the Dirac equation that fixed the value of the reciprocal of the fine-structure constant as 𝛼−1 = 16 + 1/2 × 16 × (16 − 1) = 136. When its value was discovered to be closer to 137, he changed his argument to match that value. His ideas were not widely accepted, and subsequent experiments have shown that they were wrong (for example, none of the measurements of the fine-structure constant suggest an integer value; the modern CODATA value is α−1 = 137.035999177(21).[14]

Though his derivations and equations were unfounded, Eddington was the first physicist to recognize the significance of universal dimensionless constants, now considered among the most critical components of major physical theories such as the Standard Model and ΛCDM cosmology.[15] He was also the first to argue for the importance of the cosmological constant Λ itself, considering it vital for explaining the expansion of the universe, at a time when most physicists (including its discoverer, Albert Einstein) considered it an outright mistake or mathematical artifact and assumed a value of zero: this at least proved prescient, and a significant positive Λ features prominently in ΛCDM.

Eddington may have been the first to attempt in vain to derive the basic dimensionless constants from fundamental theories and equations, but he was certainly not the last. Many others would subsequently undertake similar endeavors, and efforts occasionally continue even today. None have yet produced convincing results or gained wide acceptance among theoretical physicists.[16][17]

An empirical relation between the masses of the electron, muon and tau has been discovered by physicist Yoshio Koide, but this formula remains unexplained.[18]

Examples[edit]

Dimensionless fundamental physical constants include:

Fine-structure constant[edit]

One of the dimensionless fundamental constants is the fine-structure constant:

0.0072973525643(11),

where e is the elementary charge, ħ is the reduced Planck constant, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. The fine-structure constant is fixed to the strength of the electromagnetic force. At low energies, α1/137, whereas at the scale of the Z boson, about 90 GeV, one measures α1/127. There is no accepted theory explaining the value of α; Richard Feynman elaborates:

There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant, e – the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. (My physicist friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with about an uncertainty of about 2 in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.) Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling comes from: is it related to pi or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms? Nobody knows. It's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!

— Richard P. Feynman (1985). QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press. p. 129. ISBN 978-0-691-08388-9.

Standard Model[edit]

The original Standard Model of particle physics from the 1970s contained 19 fundamental dimensionless constants describing the masses of the particles and the strengths of the electroweak and strong forces. In the 1990s, neutrinos were discovered to have nonzero mass, and a quantity called the vacuum angle was found to be indistinguishable from zero.[citation needed]

The complete Standard Model requires 25 fundamental dimensionless constants (Baez, 2011). At present, their numerical values are not understood in terms of any widely accepted theory and are determined only from measurement. These 25 constants are:

Cosmological constants[edit]

The cosmological constant, which can be thought of as the density of dark energy in the universe, is a fundamental constant in physical cosmology that has a dimensionless value of approximately 10−122.[19] Other dimensionless constants are the measure of homogeneity in the universe, denoted by Q, which is explained below by Martin Rees, the baryon mass per photon, the cold dark matter mass per photon and the neutrino mass per photon.[20]

Barrow and Tipler[edit]

Barrow and Tipler (1986) anchor their broad-ranging discussion of astrophysics, cosmology, quantum physics, teleology, and the anthropic principle in the fine-structure constant, the proton-to-electron mass ratio (which they, along with Barrow (2002), call β), and the coupling constants for the strong force and gravitation.

Martin Rees's 'six numbers'[edit]

Martin Rees, in his book Just Six Numbers,[21] mulls over the following six dimensionless constants, whose values he deems fundamental to present-day physical theory and the known structure of the universe:

N and ε govern the fundamental interactions of physics. The other constants (D excepted) govern the size, age, and expansion of the universe. These five constants must be estimated empirically. D, on the other hand, is necessarily a nonzero natural number and does not have an uncertainty. Hence most physicists would not deem it a dimensionless physical constant of the sort discussed in this entry.

Any plausible fundamental physical theory must be consistent with these six constants, and must either derive their values from the mathematics of the theory, or accept their values as empirical.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Stroke, H. H., ed., The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1995), p. 525.
  2. ^ Vértes, A., Nagy, S., Klencsár, Z., Lovas, R. G., & Rösch, F., eds., Handbook of Nuclear Chemistry, (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2011), p. 367.
  3. ^ Baez, John (2011-04-22). "How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?". math.ucr.edu. Retrieved 2018-04-13.
  4. ^ Rich, James (2013-04-02). "Dimensionless constants and cosmological measurements". arXiv:1304.0577 [astro-ph.CO].
  5. ^ Michael Duff (2014). "How fundamental are fundamental constants?". Contemporary Physics. 56 (1): 35–47. arXiv:1412.2040. Bibcode:2015ConPh..56...35D. doi:10.1080/00107514.2014.980093. S2CID 118347723.
  6. ^ Duff, M. J. (13 August 2002). "Comment on time-variation of fundamental constants". arXiv:hep-th/0208093.
  7. ^ Duff, M. J.; Okun, L. B.; Veneziano, G. (2002). "Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2002 (3): 023. arXiv:physics/0110060. Bibcode:2002JHEP...03..023D. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/03/023. S2CID 15806354.
  8. ^ a b "Introduction to the Fundamental Physical Constants". physics.nist.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-13.
  9. ^ http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ NIST
  10. ^ "Physical constant". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2018-04-13.
  11. ^ Karshenboim, Savely G. (August 2005). "Fundamental Physical Constants: Looking from Different Angles". Canadian Journal of Physics. 83 (8): 767–811. arXiv:physics/0506173. Bibcode:2005CaJPh..83..767K. doi:10.1139/p05-047. ISSN 0008-4204. S2CID 475086.
  12. ^ Mohr, Peter J.; Newell, David B.; Taylor, Barry N. (2016-09-26). "CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2014". Reviews of Modern Physics. 88 (3): 035009. arXiv:1507.07956. Bibcode:2016RvMP...88c5009M. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035009. ISSN 0034-6861. S2CID 1115862.
  13. ^ Kuntz, I., Gravitational Theories Beyond General Relativity, (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2019), pp. 58–61.
  14. ^ "2022 CODATA Value: inverse fine-structure constant". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. NIST. May 2024. Retrieved 2024-05-18.
  15. ^ Prialnik, D. K., An Introduction to the Theory of Stellar Structure and Evolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 82.
  16. ^ Kragh, Helge (2015-10-14). "On Arthur Eddington's Theory of Everything". arXiv:1510.04046 [physics.hist-ph].
  17. ^ Gamow, G. (1968-02-01). "Numerology of the Constants of Nature". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 59 (2): 313–318. Bibcode:1968PNAS...59..313G. doi:10.1073/pnas.59.2.313. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 224670. PMID 16591598.
  18. ^ Rivero, A.; Gsponer, A. (February 2, 2008). "The strange formula of Dr. Koide". p. 4. arXiv:hep-ph/0505220.
  19. ^ Jaffe, R. L., & Taylor, W., The Physics of Energy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), p. 419.
  20. ^ Tegmark, Max (2014). Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 252. ISBN 9780307599803.
  21. ^ Radford, T., "Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe by Martin Rees—review", The Guardian, June 8, 2012.
  22. ^ a b Rees, M. (2000)
  23. ^ Rees, M. (2000), p. 53.
  24. ^ Rees, M. (2000), p. 110.
  25. ^ Rees, M. (2000), p. 118.

Bibliography[edit]

External articles[edit]

General
Articles on variance of the fundamental constants