Jump to content

Wikipedia:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
AIDbot (talk | contribs)
507 edits
m Updating nominations
Line 200: Line 200:
----
----


===[[History of the World Wide Web]] (20 votes, stays until [[September 17]])===
===[[History of the World Wide Web]] (21 votes, stays until [[September 17]])===
:''Nominated [[August 6]], [[2006]]; needs at least 24 votes by [[September 17]], [[2006]]''
:''Nominated [[August 6]], [[2006]]; needs at least 24 votes by [[September 17]], [[2006]]''


Line 830: Line 830:
----
----


===[[Chinese currency]] (2 vote, stays until [[September 18]])===
===[[Chinese currency]] (3 vote, stays until [[September 18]])===
:''Nominated [[September 11]], [[2006]]; needs at least 4 votes by [[September 18]], [[2006]]''
:''Nominated [[September 11]], [[2006]]; needs at least 4 votes by [[September 18]], [[2006]]''


Line 852: Line 852:
; Comments:
; Comments:
* The article [[Mafia]], much like many other organized crime articles such as [[La Cosa Nostra]]/[[Italian Mafia]] (both of which cover the same subject) and [[National Crime Syndicate]], has become a mess containing poorly referenced material and common misconseptions further complicated by various internet resources. This matter is currently in discussion at [[User talk:MadMax/Organized crime|WikiProject Organized crime]].
* The article [[Mafia]], much like many other organized crime articles such as [[La Cosa Nostra]]/[[Italian Mafia]] (both of which cover the same subject) and [[National Crime Syndicate]], has become a mess containing poorly referenced material and common misconseptions further complicated by various internet resources. This matter is currently in discussion at [[User talk:MadMax/Organized crime|WikiProject Organized crime]].

----

Revision as of 10:20, 13 September 2006

Shortcut

The Article Creation and Improvement Drive is a weekly collaboration to improve articles to featured article status.

/History - For past winners.
/Removed - For removed nominations.
/Maintenance - ARCAID upkeep.

Collaborations
Articles
Science and technology
Miscellaneous

Introduction

To vote or nominate you have to be a registered user with at least one contribution that is not a vote. Any and all articles may be nominated except:

If you wish to help with maintenance of Article Improvement Drive (updating vote counts and such, please see this page: /Maintenance.

{{User AID}} unfolds to

This user participated in the Article Creation and Improvement Drive.




How to nominate

Here is the template for nominations: 

===[[ARTICLE]] (1 vote, stays until [[DATE ONE WEEK LATER]])===
:''Nominated [[MONTH DAY]], [[YEAR]]; needs at least 4 votes by [[DATE ONE WEEK LATER]], [[YEAR]]''

; Support:
# (sign with four tildes)

; Comments:
* (put your reason for nomination, sign again)

----
  1. Copy and paste the template to the bottom of the list of nominations on this page and fill it out. It is important to use UTC time; the current time and date now is 06:29, Tuesday, June 11, 2024 (UTC).
  2. Under "comments" section put explanation of what work is needed.
  3. After submitting the new nomination, go to the nominated article and put {{AIDnom}}{{to do}} on the top of the article's talk page.

How to vote

Sign with "# ~~~~" on the end of the list of the article you want to vote for and then update the vote count in the subhead. Opposing votes are not counted; see approval voting. You can vote for as many articles as you like. If, after you vote, the vote count equals the "needs at least xx votes by", then add 4 to "needs at least xx votes" and add a week to date in vote count and "needs at least xx votes by" notice.

Example. You encounter this situation and decide to vote:

===[[History of the world]] (23 votes, stays until [[February 7]], [[2006]])===
:''Nominated [[December 8]], [[2005]]; needs at least 24 votes by [[February 7]], [[2006]]''

First you put "# ~~~~" on the end of the list of people who voted for that article and then change the vote count and date in following manner:

===[[History of the world]] (24 votes, stays until [[February 14]], [[2006]])===
:''Nominated [[December 8]], [[2005]]; needs at least 28 votes by [[February 14]], [[2006]]''

How the article is selected

Article with most votes on each Sunday in 00:00 GMT is selected as "The current Article Improvement Drive article". If two articles have same number of votes, the older nominee wins.

The next project article is to be selected on Sunday, September 17, 2006. 00:00 GMT (Template:DAYSTOSUNDAY)

How an article is removed from the list

Articles need four votes per week to stay on the list. If current date (June 11 2024) exceeds "stays until" date of particular article, that article entry is removed from this page and moved to page for removed nominations.

Nominations

Death (24 votes, stays until September 16)

Nominated July 29, 2006; needs at least 28 votes by September 16, 2006
Support
  1. Lukobe 20:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. YankeeDoodle14 21:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Karuma 06:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Davodd 20:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 18:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. jwandersTalk 20:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Runa27 04:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ehjort 14:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. ZeWrestler Talk 14:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Draicone (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. TransNique 03:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mike92591 16:18, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. E Asterion u talking to me? 14:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. JQF 20:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ClockworkSoul 21:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Green caterpillar 03:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Malevious 23:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Speedystickd 23:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Benjaminx 05:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 11:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Motor.on 01:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Tachikoma 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. szyslak (t, c, e) 21:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. EamonnPKeane 10:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • A major topic about which we should have an excellent and detailed article, but our article is littered with {{unreferenced|section}} tags and lists. Lukobe 20:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • It could certainly use some improvement. Mike92591 16:18, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity (31 votes, stays until September 23)

Nominated July 29, 2006; needs at least 32 votes by September 23, 2006
Support
  1. Chrisrivers 19:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Punkedmonkey 19:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Concavelenz 23:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Un sogno modesto 04:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MrCEO 15:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 18:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. jwandersTalk 20:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. C-squared 17:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Arch O. La Grigory Deepdelver 20:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA) 16:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Homestarmy 16:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Dave 07:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Nikkimaria 11:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Casey14 21:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. TransNique 03:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wiki-newbie 17:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. JColgan 20:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Atb129 00:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. RexNL 22:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. rossnixon 08:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. ...Andy120... 14:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Irpen 18:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Andrew c 15:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ehjort 18:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Save SG-1! 21:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. GRBerry 19:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Speedystickd 23:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. andrew 08:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. CG 08:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Lumaga 18:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Tachikoma 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Article seems unrefined for such an important religion, should (like all the world religions) be a featured article. Is going to need a group effort to get back to FA status. Chrisrivers 19:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those who signed here may also wish to sign the Restorationism nom below. Arch O. La Grigory Deepdelver 22:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations (41 votes, stays until October 16)

Nominated July 31, 2006; needs at least 44 votes by October 16, 2006
Support
  1. Green caterpillar 02:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Davodd 17:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. EnemyOfTheState 18:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fsotrain09 22:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 18:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. jwandersTalk 20:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Lomedae 21:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Nikkimaria 14:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. CG 14:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --TransNique 02:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Thelb4 08:33, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ehjort 13:58, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Tschroeder 22:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 11:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Duran 12:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Jcdams 15:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Teryx 05:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Tjss(Talk) 23:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Wikipedia's False Prophet holla at me Improve Me 01:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Durova 07:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Irpen 18:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jdcooper 15:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. ClockworkSoul 21:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Starghost (talk | contribs) 03:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Espresso Addict 21:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Speedystickd 23:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. andrew
  28. Beno1983 02:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Benjaminx 05:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Shiftchange 06:56, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. PoliticalJunkie 14:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. mirageinred 23:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Gray Porpoise 00:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Readro 22:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. nkayesmith 02:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. UnseemlyWeasel 01:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Behun 01:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Wiki-newbie 13:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Daniel Collins 21:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Bfissa 18:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Storkk 09:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • A very important international aspect. Needs major NPOVing and etc. Green caterpillar 02:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The international organization, Wikipedia needs to have this as an FA. -Fsotrain09 22:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • No reference regarding "Useless Nations"? Yes it needs work. :-) — RJH (talk)
  • Perhaps the Talk page should focus on what should be removed, and only listed as See Also...and not actually be in the Article

History of the World Wide Web (21 votes, stays until September 17)

Nominated August 6, 2006; needs at least 24 votes by September 17, 2006
Support
  1. Hellionzod 01:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Davodd 02:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. warpozio 12:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dvandersluis 13:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ZeWrestler Talk 15:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 00:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Richy 19:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. TransNique 03:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Clay 02:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. TAG 19:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ehjort 18:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. mirageinred 23:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. JQF 23:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. RayBirks 14:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Espresso Addict 21:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Speedystickd 23:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. andrew 00:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. warpozio 08:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Felixboy 19:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Baseracer 14:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Knowing the people in this project, it's almost unexcusable that this is not already a featured article.
  • Has the potential to be a very interesting article. --Richy 19:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • People tend to use web a lot - but only a few know how it's started. A must to read for everybody who has browser. --TAG 19:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Microorganism (17 votes, stays until September 20)

Nominated August 16, 2006; needs at least 20 votes by September 20, 2006
Support
  1. Kafziel 15:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. BorgQueen 13:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Runningonbrains 22:12, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Durova 07:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ehjort 18:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ClockworkSoul 21:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. mirageinred 23:34, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Espresso Addict 21:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tjss(Talk) 23:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. TransNique 04:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Speedystickd 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. TimVickers 20:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. WS 22:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jelloyeti 08:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. EamonnPKeane 11:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Gray Porpoise 10:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Tachikoma 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • I was amazed that such a significant topic basically consists of three paragraphs and a "see also" section. This could be a great article if some knowledgeable people can get together on it. Kafziel 15:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I found really useful, though it could do with a little more info as it is a developing field and many people are interested in it. I agree with Kafziel that 'it could be a great article if some knowledgeable people can get together on it'.Silver4

Liquid (18 votes, stays until September 20)

Nominated August 16, 2006; needs at least 20 votes by September 20, 2006
Support
  1. --M@rēino 18:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Republitarian 15:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. TransNique 03:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. BorgQueen 13:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Davodd 19:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Green caterpillar 20:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Durova 07:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Eshcorp 15:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ehjort 18:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. ClockworkSoul 21:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. JQF 18:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. mirageinred 23:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Walkerma 03:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Espresso Addict 21:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Speedystickd 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Drstuey 09:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Readro 21:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 20:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • One of the main phases of matter, one of the most important concepts in chemistry, and yet there's no sections to speak of, and only one source. Needs both more layman translations and more technical detail; needs practical applications; needs history of science. --M@rēino 18:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • An anon user changed the assessment tag last night from "Start" to Atrocious". Says it all! Walkerma 03:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksandr Pushkin (13 votes, stays until September 18)

Nominated August 21, 2006; needs at least 16 votes by September 18, 2006
Support
  1. Errabee 16:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. KNewman 16:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Kmorozov 05:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. RexNL 22:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Irpen 18:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ehjort 18:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wikiolap 16:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cmapm 18:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. mirageinred 19:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. KingPenguin 14:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Hawkestone 10:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Storkk 15:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Russia's greatest poet deserves better than this rather short article. Errabee 16:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Embryology (17 votes, stays until September 27)

Nominated August 23, 2006; needs at least 20 votes by September 27, 2006
Support
  1. Slrubenstein | Talk 15:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nowimnthing 17:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Samsara (talk • contribs) 19:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Peta 01:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. rossnixon 01:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Andrew c 15:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ehjort 18:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. ClockworkSoul 21:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Espresso Addict 21:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. NCurse work 20:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Opabinia regalis 23:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Speedystickd 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Embryo too! Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 01:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Jersey Devil 01:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. WS 22:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Sam Weber 13:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Gary 21:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This is a very important subfield of biology yet all we have is a stub. While the Evolution page has endless debates over whether creationism should be included, debates that go nowhere but consume many many hours of time by several editors (some quite capable), here is an important scientific topic practically abandoned. Lexor suggested merging it with another article - I have no objection and leave this decision to biologists. But whether merged or kept, I think this is th perfect example of a scientific topic that deserves attention and care to help make this a great encyclopedia.

In fact, if anyone actually knows an embryologist, please encourage them to contribute!

Childhood obesity (10 votes, stays until September 14)

Nominated August 24, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 14, 2006
Support
  1. Stevage 09:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Green caterpillar 23:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jdcooper 23:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. JQF 18:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Espresso Addict 21:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. alphaChimp laudare 01:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Clay 04:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. TransNique 04:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Speedystickd 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. szyslak (t, c, e) 21:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This is a huge topic that gets a lot of media coverage in Australia, the US, the UK and probably other countries. And our article is barely more than an ugly little stub. A massive amount could be written on the topic, with studies, media controversy, facts, figures etc etc. Stevage 09:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pluto (16 votes, stays until September 29)

Nominated August 25, 2006; needs at least 20 votes by September 29, 2006
Support
  1. Davodd 02:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jeff321 04:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Shane (talk/contrib) 09:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC) - Get up to FA Status now that it's not a planet anymore..[reply]
  4. --M@rēino 15:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC) we should also improve the related articles, like Clearing the neighbourhood.[reply]
  5. ClockworkSoul 21:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. JQF 18:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Arch O. La Grigory Deepdelver 01:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. GoldenTie 17:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Speedystickd 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. TransNique 04:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --E Asterion u talking to me? 23:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. TestPilot 07:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. CG 08:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Litefantastic 01:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Amphytrite 00:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Tachikoma 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • With the recent hubbub and demotion to "dwarf planet" status, this once-fine article needs to be fixed up by us.
  • I spent 6 hours cleaning it up, if it still needs cleaning, vote. Else, unvote! :) Electrawn 01:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Votes removed
  1. 67.175.85.188 04:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC) Sorry, no anonymous votes Errabee 19:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's University (10 votes, stays until September 15)

Nominated August 25, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 15, 2006
Support
  1. Speedystickd 19:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ekrub-ntyh talk 20:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Greenmind 02:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Schrodingers Mongoose 18:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ithinkhelikesit 23:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Un sogno modesto 22:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tjss(Talk) 23:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. TransNique 04:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Adamtunis 12:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. ChristopherBorcsok 07:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Coffee (16 votes, stays until September 29)

Nominated August 25, 2006; needs at least 20 votes by September 29, 2006
Support
  1. ClockworkSoul 21:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Iolakana•T 16:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. mirageinred 23:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. RayBirks 15:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Espresso Addict 21:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Daniel Collins 19:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Speedystickd 03:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tjss(Talk) 03:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. TransNique 04:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. andrew 08:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Durova 15:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. warpozio 08:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Okinawadude 16:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Felixboy 19:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hawkestone 10:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. JoeSmack Talk 17:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This is a subject very near and dear to my heart. coffee's peer, tea, is already a featured article. Now that the FA nomination of the previous object of my obsession, caffeine, seems to be coming to a successful conclusion, this article seems like a logical followup. The current status of the article is only barely acceptable in its current form, so it needs quite a bit of work to reach FAS.
  • How could anyone not vote for coffee? I've had so much coffee today, I may have to vote several more times. ;)
  • Just thinking of this makes my heart race. :) Durova 15:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robot (8 votes, stays until September 16)

Nominated August 26, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 16, 2006
Support
  1. JQF 01:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. TransNique 04:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Speedystickd 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Readro 21:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. TestPilot 07:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. RJH (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. BorgQueen 12:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wiki-newbie 13:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Good article, a lot of info is there, it just needs to be fixed up to better meet Wikipedia standards. JQF 01:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom (8 votes, stays until September 18)

Nominated August 28, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 18, 2006
Support
  1. Duran 05:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Tjss(Talk) 23:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. andrew 00:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Brian | (Talk) 04:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Speedystickd 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hawkestone 10:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Argos'Dad 19:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. YankeeDoodle14 14:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Large article, fairly complete. Lacks sources. Duran 05:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1956 Hungarian Revolution (20 votes, stays until October 10)

Nominated August 29, 2006; needs at least 24 votes by October 10, 2006
Support
  1. Istvan 04:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. KissL 09:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ryanjo 15:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Felixboy 16:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. mirageinred 19:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Duran 05:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. TestPilot 07:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. JQF 18:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ehjort 05:55, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Stacey Doljack Borsody 18:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. fz22 19:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. ~ (The Rebel At) ~ 19:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Green caterpillar 16:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Andromeda321 03:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hawkestone 10:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Argos'Dad 19:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. HawkerTyphoon 10:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Voici 12:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Cripipper 11:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. K. Lastochka 02:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • October 23, 2006 is the 50th anniversary of this momentous uprising when Hungarian citizens bravely dared to expel the Soviet military; it was one of the bravest acts of the 20th century. It would be an appropriate featured article for 23 Oct 06, but needs lots of outside help first. People close to the subject matter are often still too passionately invested in the event to objectively evaluate different points of view, thus the page has seen more than its share of argument, revisionism (its arguably the most embarrassing of subjects to diehard communists), and rancour. The wider wiki community could do it some good and put this article up as featured on its 50th anniversary. Istvan 04:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great to get this article all cleaned up and ready for Featured status on Oct. 23....a Wikipedia salute to the memory of those brave Hungarian citizens. :) K. Lastochka 02:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bangkok (6 votes, stays until September 12)

Nominated August 29, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by September 12, 2006
Support
  1. Felixboy 15:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Okinawadude 16:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Wisekwai 18:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lerdsuwa 14:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --- Hong Qi Gong 05:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hawkestone 10:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This article deserves to be featured someday but still needs improvements to even get to good article. Peer review request has also been made on this article. Felixboy 15:04, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caspian Sea (5 votes, stays until September 13)

Nominated August 30, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by September 13, 2006
Support
  1. Lethargy 18:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Casey14 22:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ehjort 05:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ClockworkSoul 14:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Daniel Collins 21:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This is the largest lake on Earth, by both area and volume. It has already been nominated for Wikipedia:Version 0.5, and in my opinion this would be a perfect subject for a featured article. Unfortunately the article is an unreferenced mess, and many of the sections are essentially stubs or lists. --Lethargy 18:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Twain (15 votes, stays until September 27)

Nominated August 30, 2006; needs at least 16 votes by September 27, 2006
Support
  1. Speedystickd 20:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ClockworkSoul 14:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. JQF 21:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. mirageinred 04:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. KingPenguin 14:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Maurreen 23:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Vints 19:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. RexNL 23:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mitch 07:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Davodd 20:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hawkestone 10:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. JoeSmack Talk 17:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. YankeeDoodle14 20:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Tavilis 20:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. JayW 20:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • No offense but this article is in bad shape considering Mark Twain is (arguably) one of the greatest writers in American literature. Speedystickd 20:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could be a better article, given the amount of history books available that chronicle his life. Mitch 07:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • North America's Shakespeare. - Davodd 20:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Economics (5 votes, stays until September 13)

Nominated August 30, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by September 13, 2006
Support
  1. Speedystickd 21:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Tjss(Talk) 02:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ehjort 05:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. mirageinred 04:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Maurreen 23:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Lets get this back to FAS. The article needs improvement for such a vital topic. Speedystickd 21:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Egypt (8 votes, stays until September 21)

Nominated August 31, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 21, 2006
Support
  1. Green caterpillar 02:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ehjort 05:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ClockworkSoul 14:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. mirageinred 21:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Samweber 23:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Espresso Addict 12:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. YankeeDoodle14 14:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. JayW 20:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

History of Europe (8 votes, stays until September 21)

Nominated August 31, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 21, 2006
Support
  1. Atb129 23:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Juppiter 05:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. mirageinred 22:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wiki-newbie 13:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Readro 13:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hawkestone 10:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Amphytrite 21:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Obviously a very important article, but it is very thin about pre-Roman Europe and the Middle Ages.

Abercrombie & Fitch (8 votes, stays until September 22)

Nominated September 1, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 22, 2006
Support
  1. mirageinred 17:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. andrew 23:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Stuph 00:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nik 17:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 21:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sam Weber 05:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Speedystickd 22:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Green caterpillar 00:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • People might remember this as a company that caters to teenyboppers. Not that I am in love with this brand but it is a very influential, successful and long-running company. Unfortuately, the article is becoming very messy. The article already has enough information. The formatting, grammar, tone, citations are all that's needed, so please vote for this article. mirageinred 17:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Environmentalism (10 votes, stays until September 22)

Nominated September 1, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 22, 2006
Support
  1. Owen 21:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Aled Dilwyn Fisher 22.44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  3. mirageinred 21:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Starghost (talk | contribs) 23:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Samweber 23:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. JQF 03:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Durova 23:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Some P. Erson 13:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Un sogno modesto 17:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JMcD 13:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Embarassing. This is hardly better than a stub. Owen 21:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • As an environmentalist, and a believer in the Wikipedia project, I agree totally that this is, simply, an embarassment. It needs serious work and I will try to help as best I can. Aled Dilwyn Fisher 21:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • A three line stub with lists is far too little for such an important topic. Durova 23:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geology (8 votes, stays until September 22)

Nominated September 1, 2006; needs at least 12 votes by September 22, 2006
Support
  1. GRBerry 22:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. mirageinred 22:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Some P. Erson 22:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sam Weber 05:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. RexNL 23:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Espresso Addict 12:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Daniel Collins 21:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Davodd 20:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • A Core topic for version 1.0, currently rated as B-class, totally missing references. GRBerry 22:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Samweber 23:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you signed it in the wrong section, buddy. mirageinred 00:15, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I meant to sign this section... Sam Weber 05:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asia (4 votes, stays until September 16)

Nominated September 2, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by September 16, 2006
Support
  1. Green caterpillar 14:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Maurreen 23:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --- Hong Qi Gong 22:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. JQF 00:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The largest continent in the world, in size and population, and a core topic. It was an AID collaboration a year ago, but I feel it should be again. Green caterpillar 14:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic Church (5 votes, stays until September 16)

Nominated September 2, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by September 16, 2006
Support
  1. YankeeDoodle14 17:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Green caterpillar 18:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Maltesedog 20:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Tachikoma 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The largest single church on earth, should be featured article status. YankeeDoodle14 17:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course Maltesedog 20:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • While this is a great topic, there's an open RfC on the page and some contentious talk page debate. Perhaps it would be better to delay this effort a few months until after things have quieted down? Durova 08:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Austen (7 votes, stays until September 19)

Nominated September 5, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by September 19, 2006
Support
  1. Durova 08:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Espresso Addict 12:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Amphytrite 00:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. plange 00:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Istvan 02:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hawkestone 10:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Tachikoma 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Wikipedia classes this as a top-priority core biography, yet it's rated a B-class article and has a cleanup template. Surely we can do better for one of the most important writers in the English language. Durova 08:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fully agreed. I'll see what I can do. Amphytrite 00:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Spielberg (4 votes, stays until September 19)

Nominated September 5, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by September 19, 2006
Support
  1. Wiki-newbie 13:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Richy 17:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. JQF 20:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. LordHarris 12.47, 10 September 2006 (GMT)
Comments
  • Spielberg is perhaps the most powerful force in modern cinema. Wiki-newbie 13:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Class conflict (4 votes, stays until September 21)

Nominated September 7, 2006; needs at least 8 votes by September 21, 2006
Support
  1. Donnacha 15:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blockader 16:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. JQF 16:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Owen 20:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This article could really do with some major historical input, primarily on the French Revolution, but also other historical examples.

Michael J. Fox (2 votes, stays until September 14)

Nominated September 7, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 14, 2006
Support
  1. andrew 21:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. JQF 00:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Michael is a big star, and nearly everyones heard of him. The opening part of the article is a complete mess, and could really use some work. Also, the article could be expanded. Anyone want to help out? --andrew 21:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Farmer (1 vote, stays until September 16)

Nominated September 9, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 16, 2006
Support
  1. EamonnPKeane 09:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The occupation of about 3 (?) billion people worldwide, this article is a complete Americentric mess. EamonnPKeane 09:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Height (2 votes, stays until September 16)

Nominated September 9, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 16, 2006
Support
  1. Beland 18:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. +andrewTalk 03:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This has been on Wikipedia:Most wanted stubs since January, and it is a basic physical concept. The target audience of this article is probably elementary school science students; content appropriate to that age level needs to be added. -- Beland 18:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm unclear what additional content is being requested for this page. Could that be clarified? — RJH (talk) 19:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter (1 vote, stays until September 17)

Nominated September 10, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 17, 2006
Support
  1. Green caterpillar 17:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • One of the most popular books in the world, this should really be FA. Green caterpillar 17:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Harry Potter is currently being worked on by the HP WikiProject, and the article would have to wait until seventh book until it would likely be featured. I am a fan, but there are over 100 wikipedians working on it everyday. It'd just be a mess if even more worked on it. --andrewI20Talk 04:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

J. K. Rowling (1 vote, stays until September 17)

Nominated September 10, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 17, 2006
Support
  1. Green caterpillar 17:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Nominating this with Harry Potter. The author of a very popular book, let's get this to FA. Green caterpillar 17:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - see my comment for Harry Potter (above).--andrewI20Talk 04:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tôn Đức Thắng (2 vote, stays until September 17)

Nominated September 10, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 17, 2006
Support
  1. --Nishkid64 18:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • I created this article nearly a month ago, using a few encyclopedias online. I'm hoping we can improve on this article and lead it to FA eventually. For those of you who don't know, Tôn Đức Thắng was a Communist leader in Vietnam. --Nishkid64 18:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Golden Age (1 vote, stays until September 18)

Nominated September 11, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 18, 2006
Support
  1. DanielNuyu 09:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • There is so much potential for this article, but it is (and has for a while) been in lackluster condition. Habsburg Spain is already featured; this article ought to build on what is probably the most colorful portion of that period. --DanielNuyu 09:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese currency (3 vote, stays until September 18)

Nominated September 11, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 18, 2006
Support
  1. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 20:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 10:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Deep subject needs close attention and more exposure. Joe I 02:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Mafia (2 votes, stays until September 19)

Nominated September 12, 2006; needs at least 4 votes by September 19, 2006
Support
  1. MadMax 15:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Amphytrite 03:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Article_Collaboration_and_Improvement_Drive&oldid=75478895"