Haec sancta

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The decree Haec sancta ("This holy [Synod]") was published by the Council of Constance on April 6, 1415 . It contains a section on the so-called Superioritäts ask whether the Pope over a general council , or vice versa, such is above the pope. The question is related to the papal primacy .

Cutout

The section in question reads:

“Et primo (declarat), quod ipsa in spiritu sancto legitime congregata concilium generale faciens, et ecclesiam catholicam militantem repraesentans, potestatem a Christo immediate habet, cui quilibet cuiuscumque status vel dignitatis, etiam si papalis existat, obedire pertinent in his quedire tenetur et extirpationem dicti schismatis, ac reformationem dictae ecclesiae in capite et in membris. "

“This Synod, rightly assembled in the Holy Spirit, which is a general council and represents the warring Catholic Church, has its authority directly from Christ; to you everyone, whatever their rank or whatever their dignity, even if it should be papal, is obliged to obey what concerns the faith, the eradication of the schism in question and the general reform of the head and members of this Church of God. "

The decree played an essential role in shaping conciliarism .

Opinions on the decree

In theology there are four views of this decree:

  1. The council stands above the Pope : for those who support this view, the corresponding statement of the decree is a generally applicable dogma .
  2. The Council of Constance had a special position due to the schism : The advocates of this view recognized the precedence of the Council, but only in the situation at that time when three people claimed the office of Pope at the same time: Gregory XII. , John XXIII. and Benedict XIII. The council was convened to resolve this conflict. It was extremely controversial which of the named was the rightful Pope. Gregory XII, later recognized by the Church. voluntarily resigned the office and the two antipopes were deposed; only John XXIII. eventually consented to his removal.
  3. Irrelevance due to the wording : The advocates of this view point out that "Everyone [...] is held" is a very cautious formulation. In addition, obedience is limited to the topics of the Council of Constance and is not a general requirement. The formulations used are also not clear enough for a dogma. Clearer language is necessary for its announcement in order to exclude any doubt - the controversial discussion shows that it is not a dogma. Otherwise, Pope Martin V , elected at the council, could have repeated the statement and made it clearer.
  4. The Pope stands above the council : the proponents of this view hold that, in principle, no council has any power of disposal over the popes. The council was also only through the antipope John XXIII. and therefore not properly convened. Therefore the early documents of the council are invalid. The recognition of Gregory XII is necessary for this argument. as the only rightful of the three popes, since he voluntarily renounced the office and therefore the decree Haec sancta was not necessary for the deposition. The Council documents are only from the "subsequent legalization" of the Council by the recognized Pope Gregory XII. and Martin V. accepted.

Individual evidence

  1. ↑ Archive link ( Memento of the original dated May 24, 2011 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.  @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / blogit.helsinki.fi
  2. ↑ Theological Real Encyclopedia, p. 582

literature

  • The Popes - Rulers of Heaven and Earth , Hans-Christian Huf (Ed.), Ullstein Buchverlage, Berlin, 2008, ISBN 978-3-550-08693-9

Web links