Christophe de Beaumont: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
page moved to Parlement of Paris
 
(42 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|French noble and archbishop (1703–1781)}}
[[Image:Christophe de Beaumont Colour.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Christophe de Beaumont]]
{{Infobox Christian leader
'''Christophe de Beaumont''' (1703–1781), [[France|French]] [[ecclesiastic]] and [[archbishop of Paris]], was a cadet of the Les Adrets and Saint-Quentin branch of the illustrious Dauphin family of Beaumont. He became [[bishop of Bayonne]] in 1741, then [[archbishop of Vienne]] in 1745, and in 1746, at the age of forty-three, [[archbishop of Paris]]. An austere man with no wish for glory, had to be summoned three times by [[Louis XV]] before he would leave his diocese of Vienne and move to Paris. <ref> Imbert de Saint-Amand, Elizabeth Gilbert Martin (trans.), The Court of Louis XV, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York 1900 , p.196</ref>
| type = Bishop
| name = Christophe de Beaumont
| honorific-prefix = [[His Grace]]
| title = [[Archbishop of Paris]], [[Duke of Saint-Cloud]], <br/> [[Peer of France]]
| honorific-suffix = [[Order of the Holy Spirit|COHS]]
| image = Christophe de Beaumont Colour.jpg
| caption = Portrait of Christophe de Beaumont
| church = [[Roman Catholic Church]]
| archdiocese = [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Paris|Paris]]
| see = [[Notre-Dame de Paris]]
| term_start = 19 September 1746
| term_end = 12 December 1781
| predecessor = [[Jacques Bonne-Gigault de Bellefonds]]
| successor = [[Antoine-Eléonore-Léon Le Clerc de Juigné]]
| other_post = [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Vienne|Archbishop of Vienne]]<br>[[Roman Catholic Diocese of Bayonne, Lescar and Oloron|Bishop of Bayonne]]
| ordination = 19 June 1734
| ordained_by = François de Crussol d’Uzès
| consecration = 24 December 1741
| consecrated_by = Louis-Jacques Chapt de Rastignac
| birth_date = {{Birth date|1703|07|26|df=yes}}
| birth_place = [[Château de la Roque]], [[Aquitaine]], [[Kingdom of France|France]]
| death_date = {{Death date and age|1781|12|12|1703|07|26|df=yes}}
| death_place = [[Paris]], [[Kingdom of France|France]]
| nationality = French
| coat_of_arms = Blason_famille_fr_de_Beaumont_du_Repaire_et_de_Beynac.svg
}}
'''Christophe de Beaumont du Repaire''' (26 July 1703 – 12 December 1781) was a [[Kingdom of France|French]] [[cleric]] who belonged to a cadet branch of the Les Adrets and Saint-Quentin branches of the illustrious Dauphin family of Beaumont. He became [[Bishop of Bayonne]] in 1741, then [[Archbishop of Vienne]] in 1745, and in 1746, at the age of forty-three, [[Archbishop of Paris]].{{sfn|Chisholm|1911}} An austere man with no wish for glory, had to be summoned three times by [[Louis XV]] before he would leave his diocese of Vienne and move to Paris.<ref>{{cite work |first=Imbert de|last=Saint-Amand |translator=Elizabeth Gilbert Martin |title=The Court of Louis XV |series=Femmes de Versailles.English |url=http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/100765107 |publisher=Charles Scribner's Sons |location=New York |year=1900 |page=196}}</ref>


== The Struggle Against Jansenism ==
==History==
=== The Struggle Against Jansenism ===
Beaumont is noted for his struggle with the [[Jansenism|Jansenists]]. To force them to accept the [[papal bull|bull]] [[Unigenitus]] (1713) which condemned their doctrines, he ordered the priests of his diocese to withhold sacraments from those who would not recognize the bull, and to deny funeral rites to those who had confessed to a Jansenist priest. This measure had severe, damning implications for Jansenists, provoking widespread outcry against such intolerance from the Jansenists themselves, the philosophes, the parlements, and the larger public.
Beaumont is noted for his struggle with the [[Jansenism|Jansenists]]. To force them to accept the [[papal bull|bull]] [[Unigenitus]] (1713) which condemned their doctrines, he ordered the priests of his diocese to withhold sacraments from those who would not recognize the bull, and to deny funeral rites to those who had confessed to a Jansenist priest.{{sfn|Chisholm|1911}} This measure had severe, damning implications for Jansenists, provoking widespread outcry against such intolerance from the Jansenists themselves, the [[Philosophes]], the [[Parlement|parlements]], and the larger public.{{Citation needed|date=February 2022}}


While other bishops sent Beaumont their adhesion to his crusade, the [[''Parlement'']] of Paris threatened to confiscate his temporalities. [[Louis XV of France]] forbade the ''[[Parlement]]'' to interfere in these spiritual questions, and upon its proving obdurate it was exiled (September 18, 1753). The royal chamber, which was substituted, having failed to carry on the administration of justice properly, the king was obliged to recall the ''parlement'', and the archbishop was sent into honorable exile to Conflans, where he remained from August 1754 until October 1757. <ref>Imbert de Saint-Amand, Elizabeth Gilbert Martin (trans.), The Court of Louis XV, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York 1900, p.197</ref>. Efforts were made to induce him to resign the active duties of his see to a coadjutor, he refused despite the most tempting offers - including a [[cardinal (Catholicism)|cardinal's hat]]. As the dispute between the king and the Parlements continued, de Beaumont was exiled from Paris a second time, from January 1758 to October 1759. <ref>Imbert de Saint-Amand, Elizabeth Gilbert Martin (trans.), The Court of Louis XV, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York 1900, p.199</ref> He eventually returned, having conceded none of his principles. 'Let them erect a scaffold in the midst of the court' he said, 'I would ascend it to maintain my rights, fulfil my duties and obey the laws of my conscience.' <ref>Imbert de Saint-Amand, Elizabeth Gilbert Martin (trans.), The Court of Louis XV, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York 1900, p.200</ref>
While other bishops sent Beaumont their adhesion to his crusade, the [[Parlement of Paris]] threatened to confiscate his temporalities. [[Louis XV]] forbade the ''Parlement'' to interfere in these spiritual questions, and upon its proving obdurate it was exiled (18 September 1753). The royal chamber, which was substituted, having failed to carry on the administration of justice properly, the king was obliged to recall the ''parlement'', and the archbishop was sent into honorable exile to Conflans{{Clarify|date=June 2023|reason=Which one?}}, where he remained from August 1754 until October 1757.<ref>Saint-Amand (1900) p.197</ref> Efforts were made to induce him to resign the active duties of his see to a coadjutor, he refused despite the most tempting offers - including a [[cardinal (Catholicism)|cardinal's hat]].{{sfn|Chisholm|1911}} As the dispute between the king and the Parlements continued, de Beaumont was exiled from Paris a second time, from January 1758 to October 1759.<ref>Saint-Amand (1900) p.199</ref> He eventually returned, having conceded none of his principles. 'Let them erect a scaffold in the midst of the court' he said, 'I would ascend it to maintain my rights, fulfil my duties and obey the laws of my conscience.' <ref>Saint-Amand (1900) p.200</ref>


To his polemic against the Jansenists he added an attack on the ''[[philosophe]]s'', and issued a formal mandatory letter condemning [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau|Rousseau]]'s ''[[Emile: or, On Education|Émile]]''. Rousseau replied in his masterly ''Lettre a M. de Beaumont'' (1762), in which he insists that freedom of discussion in religious matters is essentially more religious than the attempt to impose belief by force.
To his polemic against the Jansenists he added an attack on the ''philosophes'', and issued a formal mandatory letter condemning [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau|Rousseau]]'s ''[[Emile: or, On Education|Émile]]''. Rousseau replied in his masterly ''Lettre a M. de Beaumont'' (1762), in which he insists that freedom of discussion in religious matters is essentially more religious than the attempt to impose belief by force.{{sfn|Chisholm|1911}}


==Defending the Authority of the Church==
===Defending the Authority of the Church===
Archbishop de Beaumont was a forthright and powerful voice in defence of Church authority and an opponent of anything that he saw as undermining it. This often put him at odds with statesmen and thinkers alike. He was strongly opposed to the project of [[Diderot]], [[D’Alembert]] and others to publish the [[Encyclopédie]], and he appointed the censors who required the modification or deletion of articles which were deemed contrary to Church teaching.<ref>Blom, Philipp, Encyclopedie, the Triumph of Reason in an Unreasonable Age Fourth Estate, London 2004 p. 155</ref> At de Beaumont's request, volume 2 of the Encyclopédie was banned in 1752 because it contained material deemed to be heretical.<ref> Pevitt Algrant, Christine, Madame de Pompadour, Harper Collins, London 2003 p.137</ref> He was so strongly opposed to [[Madame de Pompadour]] that he said he should like to see her burned, and he refused her permission to receive the sacraments in her chapel.<ref>Mitford, Nancy, Madame de Pompadour, Hamish Hamilton Ltd. 1972 p.175</ref>
Archbishop de Beaumont was a forthright and powerful voice in defence of Church authority and an opponent of anything that he saw as undermining it. This often put him at odds with statesmen and thinkers alike. He was strongly opposed to the project of [[Diderot]], [[D’Alembert]] and others to publish the [[Encyclopédie]], and he appointed the censors who required the modification or deletion of articles which were deemed contrary to Church teaching.<ref>Blom, Philipp, Encyclopedie, the Triumph of Reason in an Unreasonable Age Fourth Estate, London 2004 p. 155</ref> At de Beaumont's request, volume 2 of the Encyclopédie was banned in 1752 because it contained material deemed to be heretical.<ref>Pevitt Algrant, Christine, Madame de Pompadour, Harper Collins, London 2003 p.137</ref> He was so strongly opposed to [[Madame de Pompadour]] that he said he should like to see her burned, and he refused her permission to receive the sacraments in her chapel.<ref>Mitford, Nancy, Madame de Pompadour, Hamish Hamilton Ltd. 1972 p.175</ref>
In 1762 the [[Jesuit order|Society of Jesus]] was suppressed in France, and de Beaumont realised that if the king and the Parlements were able to take such a drastic step the Church itself was in potential danger. In October 1763 he published a pastoral instruction condemning the encroachment of civil authority upon the spiritual. The Parlement of Paris responded by ordering the public hangman to burn the book and summoned the Archbishop to appear before it. [[Louis XV]], anxious to avoid a major confrontation, once again banished de Beaumont from his diocese. <ref>Lacouture, Jean, Jesuits, Counterpoint Press, Washington DC, 1995, p.281 </ref>
In 1762 the [[Jesuits|Society of Jesus]] was suppressed in France, and de Beaumont realised that if the king and the Parlements were able to take such a drastic step the Church itself was in potential danger. In October 1763 he published a pastoral instruction condemning the encroachment of civil authority upon the spiritual. The Parlement of Paris responded by ordering the public hangman to burn the book and summoned the Archbishop to appear before it. Louis XV, anxious to avoid a major confrontation, once again banished de Beaumont from his diocese.<ref>{{cite book |last=Lacouture |first=Jean |title=Jesuits : A Multibiography |publisher=Counterpoint Press |location=Washington DC |year=1995 |isbn=1887178058 |page=[https://archive.org/details/jesuits00jean/page/281 281] |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/jesuits00jean/page/281 }}</ref>


On 21 July 1773 the international campaign against the Jesuit Order reached the point where Pope [[Clement XIV]] issued the brief Dominus ac Redemptor which formally abolished the Order around the world. The brief was explicitly indicated that the reason for the abolition was to satisfy the King of France and the other Bourbon rulers of Europe. Archbishop de Beaumont scornfully rejected the Papal brief and wrote the following to the Pope:
On 21 July 1773 the international campaign against the Jesuit Order reached the point where Pope [[Clement XIV]] issued the brief ''[[Dominus ac Redemptor]]'' which formally abolished the Order around the world. The brief was explicitly indicated that the reason for the abolition was to satisfy the King of France and the other [[House of Bourbon|Bourbon]] rulers of Europe. Archbishop de Beaumont scornfully rejected the Papal brief and wrote the following to the Pope:


''‘This brief which destroys the Company of Jesus is nothing other than an isolated and particular judgement, pernicious, reflecting little honour on the Papal tiara and deleterious to the glory of the Church and to the glory and propagation of the orthodox (i.e. Catholic) faith….. Holy Father, it is not possible for me to commit the Clergy to the acceptance of the said brief. I would not be heard on this point were I wretch enough to lend my ministry to it, which I should be dishonouring.’'' <ref>Lacouture, Jean, Jesuits, Counterpoint Press, Washington DC, 1995, p.298</ref>
''‘This brief which destroys the Company of Jesus is nothing other than an isolated and particular judgement, pernicious, reflecting little honour on the Papal tiara and deleterious to the glory of the Church and to the glory and propagation of the orthodox (i.e. Catholic) faith….. Holy Father, it is not possible for me to commit the Clergy to the acceptance of the said brief. I would not be heard on this point were I wretch enough to lend my ministry to it, which I should be dishonouring.’'' <ref>Lacouture (1995) p.298</ref>


De Beaumont's ''Mandements, lettres et instructions pastorales'' were published in two volumes in 1780, the year before his death.{{sfn|Chisholm|1911}}


==Notes==
De Beaumont's ''Mandements, lettres et instructions pastorales'' were published in two volumes in 1780, the year before his death.


===Notes===
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


==References==

* {{EB1911|wstitle=Beaumont, Christophe de|volume=3|page=591}}

===References===
* {{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Beaumont, Christophe de}}


{{s-start}}
{{s-start}}
Line 40: Line 64:
{{end}}
{{end}}
{{Archbishops of Paris}}
{{Archbishops of Paris}}
{{Authority control|VIAF=39373425}}
{{Authority control}}

{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]]. -->
| NAME = Beaumont, Christophe de
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = Catholic bishop
| DATE OF BIRTH = 1703
| PLACE OF BIRTH =
| DATE OF DEATH = 1781
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Beaumont, Christophe de}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Beaumont, Christophe de}}
Line 59: Line 73:
[[Category:Archbishops of Vienne]]
[[Category:Archbishops of Vienne]]
[[Category:Dukes of Saint-Cloud]]
[[Category:Dukes of Saint-Cloud]]
[[Category:18th-century Roman Catholic archbishops]]
[[Category:18th-century Roman Catholic archbishops in France]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of the Holy Spirit]]
[[Category:18th-century peers of France]]
[[Category:Burials at Notre-Dame de Paris]]

Latest revision as of 01:12, 20 December 2023


Christophe de Beaumont

Archbishop of Paris, Duke of Saint-Cloud,
Peer of France
Portrait of Christophe de Beaumont
ChurchRoman Catholic Church
ArchdioceseParis
SeeNotre-Dame de Paris
Installed19 September 1746
Term ended12 December 1781
PredecessorJacques Bonne-Gigault de Bellefonds
SuccessorAntoine-Eléonore-Léon Le Clerc de Juigné
Other post(s)Archbishop of Vienne
Bishop of Bayonne
Orders
Ordination19 June 1734
by François de Crussol d’Uzès
Consecration24 December 1741
by Louis-Jacques Chapt de Rastignac
Personal details
Born(1703-07-26)26 July 1703
Died12 December 1781(1781-12-12) (aged 78)
Paris, France
NationalityFrench
Coat of armsChristophe de Beaumont's coat of arms

Christophe de Beaumont du Repaire (26 July 1703 – 12 December 1781) was a French cleric who belonged to a cadet branch of the Les Adrets and Saint-Quentin branches of the illustrious Dauphin family of Beaumont. He became Bishop of Bayonne in 1741, then Archbishop of Vienne in 1745, and in 1746, at the age of forty-three, Archbishop of Paris.[1] An austere man with no wish for glory, had to be summoned three times by Louis XV before he would leave his diocese of Vienne and move to Paris.[2]

History[edit]

The Struggle Against Jansenism[edit]

Beaumont is noted for his struggle with the Jansenists. To force them to accept the bull Unigenitus (1713) which condemned their doctrines, he ordered the priests of his diocese to withhold sacraments from those who would not recognize the bull, and to deny funeral rites to those who had confessed to a Jansenist priest.[1] This measure had severe, damning implications for Jansenists, provoking widespread outcry against such intolerance from the Jansenists themselves, the Philosophes, the parlements, and the larger public.[citation needed]

While other bishops sent Beaumont their adhesion to his crusade, the Parlement of Paris threatened to confiscate his temporalities. Louis XV forbade the Parlement to interfere in these spiritual questions, and upon its proving obdurate it was exiled (18 September 1753). The royal chamber, which was substituted, having failed to carry on the administration of justice properly, the king was obliged to recall the parlement, and the archbishop was sent into honorable exile to Conflans[clarification needed], where he remained from August 1754 until October 1757.[3] Efforts were made to induce him to resign the active duties of his see to a coadjutor, he refused despite the most tempting offers - including a cardinal's hat.[1] As the dispute between the king and the Parlements continued, de Beaumont was exiled from Paris a second time, from January 1758 to October 1759.[4] He eventually returned, having conceded none of his principles. 'Let them erect a scaffold in the midst of the court' he said, 'I would ascend it to maintain my rights, fulfil my duties and obey the laws of my conscience.' [5]

To his polemic against the Jansenists he added an attack on the philosophes, and issued a formal mandatory letter condemning Rousseau's Émile. Rousseau replied in his masterly Lettre a M. de Beaumont (1762), in which he insists that freedom of discussion in religious matters is essentially more religious than the attempt to impose belief by force.[1]

Defending the Authority of the Church[edit]

Archbishop de Beaumont was a forthright and powerful voice in defence of Church authority and an opponent of anything that he saw as undermining it. This often put him at odds with statesmen and thinkers alike. He was strongly opposed to the project of Diderot, D’Alembert and others to publish the Encyclopédie, and he appointed the censors who required the modification or deletion of articles which were deemed contrary to Church teaching.[6] At de Beaumont's request, volume 2 of the Encyclopédie was banned in 1752 because it contained material deemed to be heretical.[7] He was so strongly opposed to Madame de Pompadour that he said he should like to see her burned, and he refused her permission to receive the sacraments in her chapel.[8]

In 1762 the Society of Jesus was suppressed in France, and de Beaumont realised that if the king and the Parlements were able to take such a drastic step the Church itself was in potential danger. In October 1763 he published a pastoral instruction condemning the encroachment of civil authority upon the spiritual. The Parlement of Paris responded by ordering the public hangman to burn the book and summoned the Archbishop to appear before it. Louis XV, anxious to avoid a major confrontation, once again banished de Beaumont from his diocese.[9]

On 21 July 1773 the international campaign against the Jesuit Order reached the point where Pope Clement XIV issued the brief Dominus ac Redemptor which formally abolished the Order around the world. The brief was explicitly indicated that the reason for the abolition was to satisfy the King of France and the other Bourbon rulers of Europe. Archbishop de Beaumont scornfully rejected the Papal brief and wrote the following to the Pope:

‘This brief which destroys the Company of Jesus is nothing other than an isolated and particular judgement, pernicious, reflecting little honour on the Papal tiara and deleterious to the glory of the Church and to the glory and propagation of the orthodox (i.e. Catholic) faith….. Holy Father, it is not possible for me to commit the Clergy to the acceptance of the said brief. I would not be heard on this point were I wretch enough to lend my ministry to it, which I should be dishonouring.’ [10]

De Beaumont's Mandements, lettres et instructions pastorales were published in two volumes in 1780, the year before his death.[1]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e Chisholm 1911.
  2. ^ Saint-Amand, Imbert de (1900). The Court of Louis XV. Femmes de Versailles.English. Translated by Elizabeth Gilbert Martin. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 196.
  3. ^ Saint-Amand (1900) p.197
  4. ^ Saint-Amand (1900) p.199
  5. ^ Saint-Amand (1900) p.200
  6. ^ Blom, Philipp, Encyclopedie, the Triumph of Reason in an Unreasonable Age Fourth Estate, London 2004 p. 155
  7. ^ Pevitt Algrant, Christine, Madame de Pompadour, Harper Collins, London 2003 p.137
  8. ^ Mitford, Nancy, Madame de Pompadour, Hamish Hamilton Ltd. 1972 p.175
  9. ^ Lacouture, Jean (1995). Jesuits : A Multibiography. Washington DC: Counterpoint Press. p. 281. ISBN 1887178058.
  10. ^ Lacouture (1995) p.298

References[edit]

Catholic Church titles
Preceded by Archbishop of Paris
1746–1781
Succeeded by