Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TamB (talk | contribs) at 20:48, 20 March 2007 (→‎Current requests for protection). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit


    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Daily Record (Scotland) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect: Continual vandalism today by various IPs and newly-created accounts. TamB 20:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:88.113.137.249 (edit | [[Talk:User talk:88.113.137.249|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect:Repeated personal attacks On talk page. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 20:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected--Húsönd 20:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Sunday Mail (Scotland) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect: Continual vandalism today by various IPs and newly-created accounts. ... discospinster talk 20:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 20:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    PlayStation Portable (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full Protection. Contant editing and reverting of Custom Firmware section. Dispute needs to be solved. I've done what was requested by adding a suitable citation, yet the user is still reverting and deleteing whole sections without proper reasons, and constantly changing reasons for deletion. Huds601 20:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected due to revert warring. Cbrown1023 talk 20:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Northholm Grammar School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protection - Changing of location at least once a day, as I am the only editor it seems constant reverting is time consuming and tedious. It is one IP doing all the damage and has a warning for the Northholm Grammar School article dating back to August 06 --Mcgrath50 20:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Furthermore, it's only a single user occasionally disrupting the article. Please try to contact this user directly and request comments on your disagreement.--Húsönd 20:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    There is only one IP, and I cannot perform a block on that user because he hasn't been warned recently (the last one was August!). If he does it again, send him to WP:AIV. Cbrown1023 talk 20:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Khachkar destruction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection - Heavy warring. Artaxiad 20:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected due to revert warring. Cbrown1023 talk 20:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Candice Michelle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect Different IPs removing maintenance templates and changing formatting of headings in article w/o discussing them first on the talk page (I have since edited them to what I see is a good compromise.) as well as sometimes just inserting non-notable information and insisting it be in there. Some IPs also inserting images that vio WP:FUC Bmg916 Speak to Me 19:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 20:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    The Rolling Stones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect A lot of IP attacks on the article within the past week and especially the last few days.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 20:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    World War I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect Multiple IPs vandalizing the article. sbandrews (t) 19:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 20:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Kiss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect Multiple IPs vandalizing the article. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Seems to have gone. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Erwin Schrödinger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi protect Heavy ip vandalism. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Single-IP vandalism. Warn with WP:TT and report to WP:AIV. Xiner (talk, email) 18:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wheaton Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect Persistent vandalism from multiple accounts, mostly IP. --Minderbinder 18:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 20:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:72.10.96.168 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Semi-protect. Blocked ip, keeps blanking their user talk page. --Hiddekel 17:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected – Steel 18:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Avril Lavigne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism over the last few days. --Kurt Shaped Box 15:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected – Steel 17:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Flatulence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Seems to be a recurring target for IP vandals -- Likely schoolchildren. -Etafly 15:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected – Steel 17:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Sean Hannity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. At least 21 vandalism edits to this page in the last 24 hours. --Hiddekel 15:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected – Steel 17:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Tiger Woods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Ever since the previous semi-protection tag was removed, IP vandalism has been endless. Supertigerman 15:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected – Steel 17:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Muncie, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Ongoing IP vandals today. - Denny 14:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected – Steel 17:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Ranks of the People's Liberation Army (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. IP vandalism by sockpuppets of WP:LTA/Roitr (reverting to POV forks - diffs [1] [2] [3] show no signifant changes to the versions by indefblocked sockpuppets). --Dmitry (talk •contibs ) 14:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected – Steel 17:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Final Fantasy VII (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. High-risk page (featured article of the day) and heavy IP vandalism. Ashfire908 13:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. WP:NOPRO. – Steel 17:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. A lot of spamming by unregistered in "External Links" section. Violates WP:NOT#LINK and WP:SPAM Phill talk Edits 13:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Next to no real disruptive activity. – Steel 17:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Ted Kennedy Chappaquiddick incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    sprot long term anonymous vandal has been trying to assert this BLP violation/change for weeks. /Blaxthos 12:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected – Steel 17:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Nova 106.9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Edited page on March 18, removing a significant amount of IP vandalism, from utter nonsense to controversial material about living persons. Been vandalised again today by an IP user. Seo75 10:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Steel 17:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Airsoft guns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection. Constant IP and new account vandalism, spam links and bad quality edits. Deon Steyn 06:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Low level of simple vandalism; most other anon edits are good faith and some do seem to be of reasonable quality. – Steel 17:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Rank-navy-1-.gif (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Full protect for the two images listed above. Legitimate images have been altered by WP:LTA/Roitr and he keeps reverting to POV forks, currently as Botiskaf (talk · contribs · block log) (already blocked). It is hard to keep track of these reverting actions, as they do not trigger the watchlist. --Dmitry (talk •contibs ) 06:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected. Semi should suffice, especially as orphanbot has needed to visit one of them. – Steel 16:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Requesting temporary full protection. This article is the subject of an ongoing mediation process between myself and a group of editors, who constantly delete and revert any contribution that appears to them as "negative' . I hope we can get some mediation that hopefully produces a balanced approach. Faranbazu 03:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected – Steel 16:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    The Sims 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection - There have been more than 30 reverts in this month alone, of more than 50 repeated blankings, mentions of sex, plugs, or general vandalism from various IPs. There are 22 distinct IPs that have edited this article in the last 50 edits of the history, and most of them are vandalism. ALTON .ıl 00:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Rockstar Advanced Game Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Requesting full protection due to multiple reverts over the past 48 hours. Also see Talk:Rockstar Games presents Table Tennis. —cmsJustin (talk|contribs) 12:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Speaking as an editor, this is best off as a redirect since it's somewhat trivial and already mentioned elsewhere anyway. Whether protection is required I'm leaving to someone else. – Steel 16:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Israel-InfoBox (edit | [[Talk:Template:Israel-InfoBox|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    'Full protection due to constant reverting. --Shamir1 19:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected due to edit war.--Húsönd 20:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    2007 Timbaland plagiarism controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    This was protected a few months ago to preempt possible libelous edits. No reason to keep this protected, and the protecting sysop's reason for protection ("per DANNY") never held up. This was not a result of an office action. --- RockMFR 19:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Un-protected. It's been protected for long enough. Hopefully things have calmed down since then. Cbrown1023 talk 20:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:No original research/archive toc (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia talk:No original research/archive toc|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Page was fully protected, no reason was given. It's a simple archive page that is used on 1 (one) talk page (that is not protected, of course). There's just no reason to keep this protected. --Conti|✉ 18:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Un-protected. It's been protected for long enough. Hopefully things have calmed down since then. Cbrown1023 talk 20:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fixity of species (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Unprotect. Redirect page to History_of_evolutionary_thought#Pre-evolutionary_Thought. Pbarnes 17:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. DRV it again or something. – Steel 18:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Reliable sources (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Reliable sources|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)/etc

    Jimbo un-superceded WP:ATT over WP:RS/V/OR. The previously superceded pages were protected to move people to WP:ATT. This needs to be undone because they are now stale and editors need to be able to work out the kinks in shortcuts, language changes, etc. SchmuckyTheCat 17:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Already unprotected. -- zzuuzz(talk) 20:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Almeda University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Fully protected since March 10 even though it was the lead story in the Signpost on March 12. I don't think the mere threat of paid editing is a good reason to protect an article. Watchlisting can deal with this kind of threat; full protection should be a last resort. Kla'quot 16:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: Please speak to JzG, since he probably knows the background of the situation. – Steel 16:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Dave Batista (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Please unprotect. Protection is not needed. Needs edit as well.

    • Comment Please do not unprotect, this comment was left by an IP linked to the community banned vandal Verdict, and this article is one of his most frequent targets. Bmg916 Speak to Me 13:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I believe that it should remain blocked per BMG916's response. Verdict has caused an ungodly amount of trouble with uploading images with false copyrights. Frequent target of a community banned user. It should remain protected. Big Boss 0 13:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Under no circumstances should this page be unprotected at this time. The request was made in bad faith by long-time abusive vandal, the user banned by community consensus known initially as Verdict (talk · contribs). --Yamla 14:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Not unprotected – Steel 16:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Bobby Lashley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Please unprotect. Protection is not needed. Needs edit as well.

    • Comment Please do not unprotect, this comment was left by an IP linked to the community banned vandal Verdict, and this article is one of his most frequent targets. Bmg916 Speak to Me 13:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I believe that it should remain blocked per BMG916's response. Verdict has caused an ungodly amount of trouble with uploading images with false copyrights. Frequent target of a community banned user. It should remain protected. Big Boss 0 13:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Under no circumstances should this page be unprotected at this time. The request was made in bad faith by long-time abusive vandal, the user banned by community consensus known initially as Verdict (talk · contribs). --Yamla 14:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Not unprotected – Steel 16:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Brock Lesnar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Please unprotect. Protection is not needed. Needs edit as well.

    • Comment Please do not unprotect, this comment was left by an IP linked to the community banned vandal Verdict, and this article is one of his most frequent targets. Bmg916 Speak to Me 13:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I believe that it should remain blocked per BMG916's response. Verdict has caused an ungodly amount of trouble with uploading images with false copyrights. Frequent target of a community banned user. It should remain protected. Big Boss 0 13:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Under no circumstances should this page be unprotected at this time. The request was made in bad faith by long-time abusive vandal, the user banned by community consensus known initially as Verdict (talk · contribs). --Yamla 14:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Not unprotected – Steel 16:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Clásico Regiomontano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    The page was protected by an editor so that all parties could reach an agreement over a controversial paragraph. Said agreement has been reached. Please unprotect. Hari Seldon 05:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Already unprotected. – Steel 16:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Francis Escudero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    This article was RFP'ed because of a persistent POV editor. Now that quite a long time has passed, I think it's about time to test the waters (so to speak) and let other people edit this article to make the suggested (and long-overdue) changed to this article. Besides, with the continuing developments of the 2007 Philippine general elections, this article will benefit from the latest developments. --- Tito Pao 07:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected John Reaves (talk) 07:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Acanthocephala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect Repeated blanking of the article by several different IPs. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 10:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected, what a strange article to attack. – Riana ঋ 10:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I was thinking the same. Thanks. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Tila Tequila (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect. Persistent attack and defamation of the article, by new users and ip addresses. Already sem-pro--KZ Talk • Vandal • Contrib 07:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Yeah, that was me, I saw your request on John Reaves's talk :) – Riana ঋ 10:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Sin (rapper) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection. Frequent serial vandalism by users HarryHall86 05:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. last 30 edits, over the last 24 hours are by you so unless your the serial vandal... Gnangarra 06:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Drew Bledsoe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection. Frequent vandalism by anyonomous users Michigan10 05:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Gnangarra 06:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unburied (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Requesting temporary full protection. Constant IP vandalism involving personal attacks.Unburied stl 12:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected semi is suficient to deter IP nonsense Gnangarra 06:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Leandro Barbosa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. An unlogged user has continued to revert POV edits after multiple users have deleted the offending material. The user has violated the 3RR, although I do not want to report him for it. I would rather semi-protect the article and allow him to continue his time here. Kntrabssi 04:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. 24 hour block as per WP:3RR policy Gnangarra 05:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Semi-protected after vandilism started from an other IP. Gnangarra 06:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Requesting Full Protection due to a revert war over content which seems to violate WP:OR#No_original_research dposse 01:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected John Reaves (talk) 04:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Feces (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Constant IP and new account vandalism since unprotected on March 16. Apparently it's just too tempting a target.--Kubigula (talk) 02:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Xiner (talk, email) 03:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wright brothers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. High level of IP and new account vandalism. About 17 times in the last 24 hours. Random Passer-by 02:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xiner (talk, email) 03:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    French Revolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection - Persistent ongoing IP anon vandalism. - Denny 01:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Slowking Man. Xiner (talk, email) 03:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    George Mason High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    • Semi-protect for 1 month due to anon and some registered users engaging in nonsense edit wars. --67.188.0.96 01:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Semi-protected – Riana ঋ 04:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Final Fantasy VII (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Cascading-protection: Why in earth it isn´t protected since is today featured article? Just reverted a edit, and It just received information that the page has been vandalized more times--ometzit<col> 01:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined We do not protect featured articles. -- ReyBrujo 01:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    We can protect featured articles, just they have to be the target of heavy vandalism, the way the policy is written as of now :). —— Eagle101 Need help? 02:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Nitrogen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection +expiry 6 hours, Heavy vandalism by anomynous IPs and users -- Hdt83 | Talk 00:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Current level of activity does not justify protection. Revert+warnings+WP:AIV suffices for now.--Húsönd 00:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Jousting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection Frequent heavy vandalism by anon users.--LWF 23:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was only vandalism from four users in the last five days. –Llama mantalkcontribs 00:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Cassie Bernall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection Uuntil the dispute is resolved. Annon continues POV pushing when told to stop, annon turns to vandalism of said article and user pages. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 23:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – It's only vandalism/POV pushing from one user, so I don't believe semi-protection is necessary; perhaps a block if it continues? –Llama mantalkcontribs 00:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=116615342"