Roger Hollis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Mole suspicions: Copyedit (minor)
add reference
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|British intelligence office, Director General MI5}}
{{Use British English|date=January 2018}}
{{Use British English|date=January 2018}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2016}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2016}}
Line 6: Line 7:
| name = Sir Roger Hollis
| name = Sir Roger Hollis
| nickname =
| nickname =
| image =
| image = File:Roger Hollis.jpg
| caption =
| caption =
| allegiance = United Kingdom [[File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|20px]]
| allegiance = United Kingdom [[File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|20px]]
Line 22: Line 23:
}}
}}


'''Sir Roger Henry Hollis''' {{post-nominals|country=GBR|KBE|CB}} (2 December 1905 – 26 October 1973) was a British [[journalist]] and [[intelligence officer]] who served with [[MI5]] from 1938 to 1965. He was [[Director general of MI5|Director General of MI5]] from 1956 to 1965.
'''Sir Roger Henry Hollis''' {{post-nominals|country=GBR|KBE|CB}} (2 December 1905 – 26 October 1973) was a British [[intelligence officer]] who served with [[MI5]] from 1938 to 1965. He was [[Director General of MI5]] from 1956 to 1965.


Some commentators, including the journalist [[Chapman Pincher]] and intelligence officer [[Peter Wright (MI5 officer)|Peter Wright]], have suggested that Hollis was a [[Soviet]] agent. In his book ''[[The Defence of the Realm: The Authorised History of MI5]]'' (2009), the [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge]] historian [[Christopher Andrew (historian)|Christopher Andrew]] rejects this theory.
Some commentators, including the journalist [[Chapman Pincher]] and intelligence officer [[Peter Wright (MI5 officer)|Peter Wright]], suggested that Hollis was a [[Soviet]] agent. In his book ''[[The Defence of the Realm: The Authorized History of MI5]]'' (2009), the [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge]] historian [[Christopher Andrew (historian)|Christopher Andrew]] rejects this theory.


The government's official position, first stated by [[Margaret Thatcher]], is that there was no evidence that Hollis might have been a traitor.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/documents-show-that-former-mi5-chief-sir-roger-hollis-was-not-a-traitor-q8tv5kstl7j |title=Documents show that former MI5 chief Sir Roger Hollis was not a traitor |date=24 October 2008 |work=The Times|access-date=30 December 2020 |quote=}}</ref>
The government's official position, first stated by [[Margaret Thatcher]], is that there was no evidence that Hollis was a traitor.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/documents-show-that-former-mi5-chief-sir-roger-hollis-was-not-a-traitor-q8tv5kstl7j |title=Documents show that former MI5 chief Sir Roger Hollis was not a traitor |date=24 October 2008 |work=The Times|access-date=30 December 2020 |quote=}}</ref>


==Early years, family, and education==
==Early years, family, and education==
Hollis' father, the Right Reverend [[George Hollis (bishop)|George Hollis]], was [[Bishop of Taunton]]. His mother was a daughter of a Canon of Wells Cathedral.<ref name="Pincher, 1984, p. 14">Pincher, 1984, p. 14</ref> Hollis was educated at [[Clifton College]], [[Bristol]].<ref>"Clifton College Register" Muirhead, J.A.O. p367: Bristol; J.W Arrowsmith for Old Cliftonian Society; April, 1948</ref> From 1924 to the spring of 1926, he attended [[Worcester College, Oxford]], where he read English, but left without completing his degree.<ref name="Pincher, 1984, p. 14"/> At Oxford he was part of the [[Hypocrites' Club]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Pincher|first1=Chapman|title=Treachery: Betrayals, Blunders, and Cover-ups: Six Decades of Espionage Against America and Great Britain|date=2009|publisher=Random House Publishing Group|page=27|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=netJI5stGlwC&pg=PA27|accessdate=21 January 2018|isbn=9781588368591}}</ref>
Hollis's father, the Right Reverend [[George Hollis (bishop)|George Hollis]], was [[Bishop of Taunton]]. His mother was the daughter of a Canon of Wells Cathedral.<ref name="Pincher, 1984, p. 14">Pincher, 1984, p. 14</ref> Hollis was educated at [[Clifton College]], [[Bristol]].<ref>"Clifton College Register" Muirhead, J.A.O. p367: Bristol; J.W Arrowsmith for Old Cliftonian Society; April, 1948</ref> From 1924 to the spring of 1926, he attended [[Worcester College, Oxford]], where he read English, but left without completing his degree.<ref name="Pincher, 1984, p. 14"/> At Oxford he was part of the [[Hypocrites' Club]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Pincher|first1=Chapman|title=Treachery: Betrayals, Blunders, and Cover-ups: Six Decades of Espionage Against America and Great Britain|date=2009|publisher=Random House Publishing Group|page=27|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=netJI5stGlwC&pg=PA27|accessdate=21 January 2018|isbn=9781588368591}}</ref>


==Professional career==
==Professional career==
From the spring of 1926 into 1927, he was a clerk for the [[Standard Chartered Bank]] in London.<ref>Pincher, 1984, p. 17</ref> In early 1927, he went to [[Hong Kong]] as a freelance journalist, then moved to [[Shanghai]]. From 1 April 1928, he worked for [[British American Tobacco]]. In 1930, he transferred to [[Beijing]].<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zH1JDwAAQBAJ&q=Roger+Hollis+1930+Beijing&pg=PT76|title=Secret War for China: Espionage, Revolution and the Rise of Mao|first= Panagiotis |last=Dimitrakis|year=2017|publisher=IB Taurus|isbn=978-1784539030}}</ref>
From the spring of 1926 into 1927, he was a clerk for the [[Standard Chartered Bank]] in London.<ref>Pincher, 1984, p. 17</ref> In early 1927, he went to [[Hong Kong]] as a freelance journalist, then moved to [[Shanghai]]. From 1 April 1928, he worked for [[British American Tobacco]]. In 1930, he transferred to [[Beijing]].<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zH1JDwAAQBAJ&q=Roger+Hollis+1930+Beijing&pg=PT76|title=Secret War for China: Espionage, Revolution and the Rise of Mao|first= Panagiotis |last=Dimitrakis|year=2017|publisher=IB Taurus|isbn=978-1784539030}}</ref>


In June 1938, he joined MI5 F Division (Countersubversion). Many departments of MI5, including F Division, moved from London to [[Blenheim Palace]], [[Oxfordshire]], during [[World War II]], due to threat of bombing.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mi5.gov.uk/mi5-in-world-war-ii|title=MI5 In World War II – MI5 – The Security Service|website=www.mi5.gov.uk|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref> From 1953–56, Hollis was MI5 Deputy Director General under [[Dick White]], succeeding White in 1956 and remaining in that post until his retirement in 1965.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1981/03/28/Spy-scandals-rock-Britain/5681354603600/|title=Spy scandals rock Britain|date=28 March 1981|website=UPI|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>
In June 1938, he joined MI5 F Division (Countersubversion). Many departments of MI5, including F Division, moved from London to [[Blenheim Palace]], [[Oxfordshire]], during [[World War II]], due to threat of bombing.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mi5.gov.uk/mi5-in-world-war-ii|title=MI5 In World War II – MI5 – The Security Service|website=www.mi5.gov.uk|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref> From 1953 to 1956, Hollis was MI5 Deputy Director General under [[Dick White]], succeeding White in 1956 and remaining in that post until his retirement in 1965.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1981/03/28/Spy-scandals-rock-Britain/5681354603600/|title=Spy scandals rock Britain|date=28 March 1981|website=UPI|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>


==Mole suspicions==
==Mole suspicions==

=== During his life ===
After [[Kim Philby]]'s flight from [[Beirut]] to [[Moscow]] in 1963, rumours began to circulate that Hollis had alerted him to his impending arrest. Hollis was criticised for not alerting [[John Profumo]], the [[Secretary of State for War|War Secretary]] in Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan]]'s Conservative government, that he might have become entangled with a Soviet spy ring through his friendship with [[Stephen Ward]] and his affair with showgirl [[Christine Keeler]], who was introduced by Ward to Profumo. Soviet Naval Attache Eugene Ivanov was also involved with Keeler at this time, in the early 1960s, and sought to learn the date of American plans to arm nuclear warheads in West Germany, from Profumo through Keeler. Profumo had to resign in mid-1963, and the resulting scandal did much to bring the Labour Party to power in the October 1964 General Election.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/politics97/background/pastelec/ge64.shtml|title=15 October 1964 General Election|website=BBC|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>
After [[Kim Philby]]'s flight from [[Beirut]] to [[Moscow]] in 1963, rumours began to circulate that Hollis had alerted him to his impending arrest. Hollis was criticised for not alerting [[John Profumo]], the [[Secretary of State for War|War Secretary]] in Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan]]'s Conservative government, that he might have become entangled with a Soviet spy ring through his friendship with [[Stephen Ward]] and his affair with showgirl [[Christine Keeler]], who was introduced by Ward to Profumo. Soviet Naval Attache Eugene Ivanov was also involved with Keeler at this time, in the early 1960s, and sought to learn the date of American plans to arm nuclear warheads in West Germany, from Profumo through Keeler. Profumo had to resign in mid-1963, and the resulting scandal did much to bring the Labour Party to power in the October 1964 General Election.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/politics97/background/pastelec/ge64.shtml|title=15 October 1964 General Election|website=BBC|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>


During the 1950s and 1960s, a large number of MI5 operations failed in circumstances that suggested the Soviets had been tipped off. Although many such failures were subsequently blamed on the actions of such self-confessed or defected agents as Philby, [[Guy Burgess]] and [[Anthony Blunt]], a number of failures occurred after all three had lost their access to secret information. Some in MI5 concluded the Soviets had an agent in a very senior position within the organisation. [[Peter Wright (MI5 officer)|Peter Wright]], [[Arthur S. Martin]], [[Jane Sissmore]] and others became convinced that either Hollis or his deputy, [[Graham Russell Mitchell|Graham Mitchell]], could be the only ones responsible, eventually confiding their suspicions to [[Dick White]], director general of [[MI6]]. White instructed Martin to inform Hollis that Mitchell was a suspect, and Hollis instructed Martin (after due consideration) to keep Mitchell under surveillance. Author Nigel West implies that this was a deliberate ploy to keep tabs on both Mitchell and Hollis.<ref name="molehunt">{{cite book|last=West|first=Nigel|year=1987|title=Mole Hunt|publisher=Guild Publishing|location=London|asin=B001N3IV22|page=45}}</ref>
During the 1950s and 1960s, a large number of MI5 operations failed in circumstances that suggested the Soviets had been tipped off. Although many such failures were subsequently blamed on the actions of such self-confessed or defected agents as Philby, [[Guy Burgess]] and [[Anthony Blunt]], a number of failures occurred after all three had lost their access to secret information. Some in MI5 concluded the Soviets had an agent in a very senior position within the organisation. [[Peter Wright (MI5 officer)|Peter Wright]], [[Arthur S. Martin]], [[Jane Sissmore]] and others became convinced that either Hollis or his deputy, [[Graham Russell Mitchell|Graham Mitchell]], could be the only ones responsible, eventually confiding their suspicions to Dick White, director general of [[MI6]]. White instructed Martin to inform Hollis that Mitchell was a suspect, and Hollis instructed Martin (after due consideration) to keep Mitchell under surveillance. Author Nigel West implies that this was a deliberate ploy to keep tabs on both Mitchell and Hollis.<ref name="molehunt">{{cite book|last=West|first=Nigel|year=1987|title=Mole Hunt|publisher=Guild Publishing|location=London|asin=B001N3IV22|page=45}}</ref>


Martin eventually became so disgruntled and outspoken about Hollis's attitude toward the investigation that Hollis suspended Martin for a fortnight, and the case was turned over to Wright. Much of the investigation was centred around interviews with [[Anthony Blunt]] at that time, and Peter Wright had amassed a sizable amount of taped evidence from Blunt when Martin returned from suspension. After 1964, Blunt gradually confessed his double-agent role in exchange for immunity from prosecution.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/5889879/Anthony-Blunt-confessions-of-spy-who-passed-secrets-to-Russia-during-the-war.html|title=Anthony Blunt: confessions of spy who passed secrets to Russia during the war|date=22 July 2009|website=The Telegraph|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>
Martin eventually became so disgruntled and outspoken about Hollis's attitude toward the investigation that Hollis suspended Martin for a fortnight, and the case was turned over to Wright. Much of the investigation was centred around interviews with Anthony Blunt at that time, and Wright had amassed a sizable amount of taped evidence from Blunt when Martin returned from suspension. After 1964, Blunt gradually confessed his double-agent role in exchange for immunity from prosecution.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/5889879/Anthony-Blunt-confessions-of-spy-who-passed-secrets-to-Russia-during-the-war.html|title=Anthony Blunt: confessions of spy who passed secrets to Russia during the war|date=22 July 2009|website=The Telegraph|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>


Eventually the PETERS operation wound down. By then, some time after Hollis had retired, suspicion had lifted from Mitchell onto Hollis. The Director General [[Martin Furnival Jones]] refused to sanction an investigation into Hollis. ''Mole Hunt'' (Chapter 3, page 45) noted that the investigative team known as FLUENCY had been disbanded before any conclusions had been reached.<ref name="molehunt"/>
Eventually the operation wound down. By then, some time after Hollis had retired, suspicion had shifted from Mitchell to Hollis. New Director General [[Martin Furnival Jones]] refused to sanction an investigation into Hollis. ''Mole Hunt'' (Chapter 3, page 45) noted that the investigative team known as FLUENCY had been disbanded before any conclusions had been reached.<ref name="molehunt"/>


=== Posthumous ===
In 1984, investigative journalist [[Chapman Pincher]] published ''Too Secret Too Long'', a book which examined the early life of Hollis and his MI5 career drawing upon new sources and upon many interviews with retired intelligence personnel. Pincher published a revised edition in 2009. Pincher also accused Hollis of being a Soviet agent, although separate from the [[Cambridge Five]] spy ring. Pincher claims Hollis was recruited by [[Richard Sorge]] in China in the early 1930s to spy for the [[GRU]]. Evidence has been advanced to support these assertions by Pincher in his book, ''Treachery: Betrayals, Blunders, and Cover-ups: Six Decades of Espionage Against America and Great Britain'', which is devoted to positing that Hollis was "Elli", the highly placed mole within MI5 identified by [[Igor Gouzenko]], and operating as a Soviet agent from the 1940s until retiring from MI5.<ref>{{cite journal|title=The Unresolved Mystery of ELLI|journal = International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence|first=William A.|last= Tyrer|pages=785–808|volume=29|issue = 4|year=2016|doi=10.1080/08850607.2016.1177404|s2cid = 156338017}}</ref> In its obituary of Pincher, [[The Times]] discredited the journalist's conspiracy theory ("Paranoia Hollisiensisis") and specified that Hollis had not been a Soviet spy.<ref>{{cite news|title=Amanda Feilding: 'LSD can get deep down and reset the brain – like shaking up a snow globe'|date=8 August 2014|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-mole-hunter-who-caught-a-red-herring-x0t33jf6pmx|work=The Times|access-date=30 December 2020|quote=for much of his life he suffered from an incurable form of conspiracy disease, a highly contagious condition that he caught from Peter Wright of Spycatcher fame.}}</ref>
In 1984, investigative journalist [[Chapman Pincher]] published ''Too Secret Too Long'', a book which examined the early life of Hollis and his MI5 career drawing upon new sources and upon many interviews with retired intelligence personnel. Pincher published a revised edition in 2009. Pincher also accused Hollis of being a Soviet agent, although separate from the [[Cambridge Five]] spy ring. Pincher claims Hollis was recruited by [[Richard Sorge]] in China in the early 1930s to spy for the [[GRU (Soviet Union)|GRU]]. Evidence has been advanced to support these assertions by Pincher in his book, ''Treachery: Betrayals, Blunders, and Cover-ups: Six Decades of Espionage Against America and Great Britain'', which is devoted to positing that Hollis was "Elli", the highly placed mole within MI5 identified by [[Igor Gouzenko]], and operating as a Soviet agent from the 1940s until retiring from MI5.<ref>{{cite journal|title=The Unresolved Mystery of ELLI|journal = International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence|first=William A.|last= Tyrer|pages=785–808|volume=29|issue = 4|year=2016|doi=10.1080/08850607.2016.1177404|s2cid = 156338017}}</ref> In its obituary of Pincher, ''[[The Times]]'' discredited the journalist's conspiracy theory ("Paranoia Hollisiensis") and specified that Hollis had not been a Soviet spy.<ref name=macint>{{cite news|title=The mole hunter who caught a red herring
|first=Ben |last=Macintyre|date=8 August 2014|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-mole-hunter-who-caught-a-red-herring-x0t33jf6pmx|work=The Times|access-date=30 December 2020|quote=for much of his life he suffered from an incurable form of conspiracy disease, a highly contagious condition that he caught from Peter Wright of Spycatcher fame.}}</ref>


Under Furnival Jones, the higher management of MI5 expressed indignation and loss of morale about the Hollis affair. Hollis was asked to come in and clear up the allegations. Having been the director, Hollis was aware of the procedures of the interrogation and investigation. He remained calm and composed throughout, denying all allegations. Martin and Wright and the team were unable to convince anyone else in MI5 or MI6 that they were right about Hollis. Wright retired in January 1976, upon reaching age 60 and, by his own account, was enraged at being denied a pension for his 30 years of service, on highly legalistic and technical grounds. He emigrated to [[Tasmania]], Australia, where he wrote an account of his work at MI5. Despite attempts by [[Margaret Thatcher]]'s government to suppress the publication and distribution of ''[[Spycatcher]]'', it was finally published in 1987 and eventually sold over two million copies around the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/1988/oct/14/mainsection.richardnortontaylor|title=Newspapers win Spycatcher battle|date=14 October 1988|website=The Guardian|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>
Under Furnival Jones, the higher management of MI5 expressed indignation and loss of morale about the Hollis affair. Hollis was asked to come in and clear up the allegations. Having been the director, Hollis was aware of the procedures of the interrogation and investigation. He remained calm and composed throughout, denying all allegations. Martin and Wright and the team were unable to convince anyone else in MI5 or MI6 that they were right about Hollis. Wright retired in January 1976, upon reaching age 60 and, by his own account, was enraged at being denied a pension for his 30 years of service, on highly legalistic and technical grounds. He emigrated to [[Tasmania]], Australia, where he wrote an account of his work at MI5. Despite attempts by [[Margaret Thatcher]]'s government to suppress the publication and distribution of ''[[Spycatcher]]'', it was finally published in 1987 and eventually sold over two million copies around the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/1988/oct/14/mainsection.richardnortontaylor|title=Newspapers win Spycatcher battle|date=14 October 1988|website=The Guardian|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>


Wright alleges in ''Spycatcher'' that Gouzenko, who had worked for the GRU ([[Main Intelligence Directorate (Russia)|Main Intelligence Directorate]], the Russian foreign [[military intelligence]] service), himself deduced later that his interviewer might have been a Soviet double agent and was probably afraid that he might recognise him from case photos that Gouzenko might have seen in [[KGB]] or GRU files, hence the disguise. Gouzenko also admitted that he, being a lower level clerk, had no access to such files.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1982/06/29/Igor-Gouzenko-an-obscure-Russian-cipher-clerk-whose-defection/3286394171200/|title=Igor Gouzenko, an obscure Russian cipher clerk whose defection...|date=29 June 1982|website=UPI|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>
Wright alleges in ''Spycatcher'' that Gouzenko, who had worked for the GRU, himself deduced later that his interviewer might have been a Soviet double agent and was probably afraid that he might recognise him from case photos that Gouzenko might have seen in [[KGB]] or GRU files, hence the disguise. Gouzenko also admitted that he, being a lower level clerk, had no access to such files.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1982/06/29/Igor-Gouzenko-an-obscure-Russian-cipher-clerk-whose-defection/3286394171200/|title=Igor Gouzenko, an obscure Russian cipher clerk whose defection...|date=29 June 1982|website=UPI|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref>

The accuracy of various allegations made in the book by Wright was questioned in a review of ''Spycatcher'' published by the Center for the Study of Intelligence, an in-house think tank for the [[CIA]]. While admitting (on page 42) that the book included "factual data", the document stated that it was also "filled with [unspecified] errors, exaggerations, bogus ideas, and self-inflation". The review added (on page 45) that "Gen. Oleg Kalugin, former Chief of Counterintelligence" had confirmed to the author that Hollis had not worked for the KGB.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/U-Oct%20%201993-%20Of%20Moles%20-%20Molehunters%20-%20A%20Review%20of%20Counterintelligence%20Literature-%201977-92%20-v2.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111224044232/https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/U-Oct%20%201993-%20Of%20Moles%20-%20Molehunters%20-%20A%20Review%20of%20Counterintelligence%20Literature-%201977-92%20-v2.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=24 December 2011 |title=Of Moles and Molehunters: A Review of Counterintelligence Literature, 1977-92 |date=1 October 1993 |publisher=Center for the Study of Intelligence |access-date=30 December 2020 |quote=CSI 93-002}}</ref>


Peter Wright had given a televised interview in 1984 during the dispute with Thatcher's government. Following the interview, in July 1984, Martin wrote a letter to ''The Times''. In it, he stated that while Wright exaggerated the certainty with which they regarded Hollis's guilt, Wright was justified in saying that Hollis was the most likely candidate, for the reasons Wright had cited. In her 2001 autobiography, Christine Keeler (John Profumo's mistress), alleged, without supporting evidence, that Hollis and Stephen Ward were part of a spy ring with Sir Anthony Blunt. Ward had committed suicide on 3 August 1963 as the Profumo scandal progressed.<ref>Knightley and Kennedy, pp. 243–247</ref> In Keeler's updated book, ''Secrets and Lies'', published in 2012, Keeler stated she saw Hollis visiting Ward five times at the house she shared with Ward.<ref>Keeler, p.77</ref>
The accuracy of various allegations made in the book by Wright was questioned in a review of ''Spycatcher'' published by the Center for the Study of Intelligence, an in-house think tank for the [[CIA]]. While admitting (on page 42) that the book included "factual data", the document stated that it was also "filled with [unspecified] errors, exaggerations, bogus ideas, and self-inflation". The review added (on page 45) that "Gen. Oleg Kalugin, former Chief of Counterintelligence" had confirmed to the author that Hollis had not worked for the KGB.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/U-Oct%20%201993-%20Of%20Moles%20-%20Molehunters%20-%20A%20Review%20of%20Counterintelligence%20Literature-%201977-92%20-v2.pdf |title=Of Moles and Molehunters: A Review of Counterintelligence Literature, 1977-92 |date=1 October 1993 |publisher=Center for the Study of Intelligence |access-date=30 December 2020 |quote=CSI 93-002}}</ref>
Peter Wright had given a televised interview during the dispute with Thatcher's government. Following Peter Wright's TV interview in 1984, Arthur Martin wrote a letter to ''[[The Times]]'', and it was published 19 July 1984. Martin stated that while Wright exaggerated the certainty with which they regarded Hollis's guilt, Wright was justified in saying that Hollis was the most likely candidate, for the reasons Wright had cited. In her 2001 autobiography, [[Christine Keeler]] (John Profumo's mistress), alleged, without supporting evidence, that Hollis and [[Stephen Ward]] were part of a spy ring with Sir [[Anthony Blunt]]. Ward committed suicide on 3 August 1963 as the Profumo scandal progressed.<ref>Knightley and Kennedy, pp. 243–247</ref> In Christine Keeler's updated book, ''Secrets and Lies'', published in 2012, Keeler stated she saw Hollis five times at the house she was sharing with GRU Agent Stephen Ward. Hollis was visiting Ward at the shared house and Keeler used to serve them coffee.<ref>Keeler, p.77</ref>


In his book, ''[[The Defence of the Realm: The Authorised History of MI5]]'', a Cambridge professor, [[Christopher Andrew (historian)|Christopher Andrew]], used access to 400,000 MI5 files to compile an official history of the service. He claims he has proved conclusively that Hollis was not a double agent and that Wright was misguided at best.<ref>{{cite book|last=Andrew|first=Christoper |year=2009|title=The Defence of the Realm The Authorized History of MI5|publisher=Penguin|isbn=978-0-14-102330-4|pages=517–521}}</ref>
In his book, ''[[The Defence of the Realm: The Authorized History of MI5]]'', a Cambridge professor, [[Christopher Andrew (historian)|Christopher Andrew]], used access to 400,000 MI5 files to compile an official history of the service. He claims he has proved conclusively that Hollis was not a double agent and that Wright was misguided at best.<ref>{{cite book|last=Andrew|first=Christoper |year=2009|title=The Defence of the Realm The Authorized History of MI5|publisher=Penguin|isbn=978-0-14-102330-4|pages=517–521}}</ref>


Paul Monk, a former Australian [[Defence Intelligence Organisation|senior intelligence analyst]] and author of the [[argument map]]s used in the [[The Institute of World Politics|Institute of World Politics]] panel, provides a counterpoint to the Authorized History.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last1=Monk|last2=Wilhelm|date=2015|title=British Patriot or Soviet Spy? Clarifying A Major Cold War Mystery|url=https://www.iwp.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/20150417_ReportandChronologyHollis.pdf|publisher=The Institute of World Politics}}</ref> He believes Andrew dismisses Wright's claims almost ''ad hominem'' but fails to address the specific points made by Pincher in his final (2009) book on the subject.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Christopher Andrew and the Strange Case of Roger Hollis – Quadrant Online|url=https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2010/04/christopher-andrew-and-the-strange-case-of-roger-hollis/|access-date=2020-08-31|website=quadrant.org.au}}</ref> He describes Andrew's description of Hollis's background as – in light of the allegations made against him – insouciant. Monk feels that as he is arguing that Hollis is innocent, Andrew should have given Hollis the vetting he did not receive when he entered MI5 (Particularly in light of Hollis's relationships with ''confirmed'' Soviet assets, regardless of whether he was one of them). Monk discusses at length the flaws of the book, for example, the notion that Leo Long was definitely ''ELLI'' (this is supposedly disproved by KGB archives – Long is thought to be ''RALPH'', rather – and solely supported by the later questioned testimony of Gordievsky<ref name=":1" />). He surmises with the following<blockquote>''Christopher Andrew treads a well-worn path in failing utterly to address that case, much less refute it once and for all.''</blockquote>In the 2009 [[ITV Network|ITV]] programme, ''Inside MI5: The Real Spooks'', [[Oleg Gordievsky]] recounted how he saw the head of the British section of the [[KGB]], expressing surprise at the allegations that he read in a British newspaper about Hollis being a [[KGB]] agent, saying "Why is it they are speaking about Roger Hollis, such nonsense, can't understand it, it must be some special English trick directed against us."<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UClrXrb6Xy4 ''Inside MI5: The Real Spooks'' (ITV 2009)], youtube.com; accessed 3 April 2016.</ref>
Paul Monk, an Australian former [[Defence Intelligence Organisation|senior intelligence analyst]] and author of the [[argument map]]s used in the [[The Institute of World Politics|Institute of World Politics]] panel, provides a counterpoint to the Authorized History.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last1=Monk|last2=Wilhelm|date=2015|title=British Patriot or Soviet Spy? Clarifying A Major Cold War Mystery|url=https://www.iwp.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/20150417_ReportandChronologyHollis.pdf|publisher=The Institute of World Politics|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200222222210/https://www.iwp.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/20150417_ReportandChronologyHollis.pdf |archive-date=22 February 2020 |url-status=dead}}</ref> He believes Andrew dismisses Wright's claims almost ''ad hominem'' but fails to address the specific points made by Pincher in his final (2009) book on the subject.<ref name="quadrant">{{Cite web|title=Christopher Andrew and the Strange Case of Roger Hollis – Quadrant Online|url=https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2010/04/christopher-andrew-and-the-strange-case-of-roger-hollis/|access-date=2020-08-31|website=quadrant.org.au}}</ref> He describes Andrew's description of Hollis's background as – in light of the allegations made against him – "insouciant". Monk feels that as Andrew is arguing that Hollis is innocent, he should have given Hollis the vetting he did not receive when he entered MI5, particularly in light of Hollis's relationships with ''confirmed'' Soviet assets, regardless of whether he was one of them. Monk discusses at length the flaws of the book, for example, the notion that Leo Long was definitely ''ELLI''. This is supposedly disproved by KGB archives – Long is thought to be ''RALPH'' – and solely supported by the later questioned testimony of Gordievsky.<ref name=":1" /> He surmises with the following<blockquote>''Christopher Andrew treads a well-worn path in failing utterly to address that case, much less refute it once and for all.''<ref name="quadrant"/>
</blockquote>In the 2009 [[ITV Network|ITV]] programme, ''Inside MI5: The Real Spooks'', [[Oleg Gordievsky]] recounted how he saw the head of the British section of the KGB, expressing surprise at the allegations that he read in a British newspaper about Hollis being a KGB agent, saying "Why is it they are speaking about Roger Hollis, such nonsense, can't understand it, it must be some special English trick directed against us."<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UClrXrb6Xy4 ''Inside MI5: The Real Spooks'' (ITV 2009)], youtube.com; accessed 3 April 2016.</ref>


In 2010, [[Stephen de Mowbray]] who worked for MI6 until 1979, stated that both Hollis and Mitchell had been exonerated. "We followed Mitchell all over the place ... Nothing was found. Next Hollis was investigated but eventually also cleared" "There were suspicions with both of them. There are not suspicions now. But somebody was doing it".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8479807.stm |title=Behind a bittersweet industry |date=26 January 2010 |publisher=BBC News |access-date=30 December 2020 |quote=}}</ref>
In 2010, [[Stephen de Mowbray]] who worked for MI6 until 1979, stated that both Hollis and Mitchell had been exonerated. "We followed Mitchell all over the place ... Nothing was found. Next Hollis was investigated but eventually also cleared. There were suspicions with both of them. There are not suspicions now. But somebody was doing it."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8479807.stm |title=Behind a bittersweet industry |date=26 January 2010 |publisher=BBC News |access-date=30 December 2020 |quote=}}</ref>


On 21 April 2015, the [[Institute of World Politics]] held a panel debating whether or not Hollis was a mole. They published a report and chronology.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=http://www.iwp.edu/news_publications/detail/was-roger-hollis-a-british-patriot-or-soviet-spy|title=Was Roger Hollis a British patriot or Soviet spy?|website=The Institute of World Politics|date=21 April 2015|accessdate=18 June 2015}}</ref> One panel member, later wrote that "our panel solved nothing" perhaps because "facts have gradually blurred with supposition and theory".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fbistudies.com/2015/04/27/was-roger-hollis-a-british-patriot-or-soviet-spy/ |title=Was Roger Hollis a British patriot or Soviet spy? |date=27 April 2015 |publisher=FBI Studies |access-date=7 January 2018 |quote=}}</ref>
On 21 April 2015, the Institute of World Politics held a panel debating whether or not Hollis was a mole. They published a report and chronology.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=http://www.iwp.edu/news_publications/detail/was-roger-hollis-a-british-patriot-or-soviet-spy|title=Was Roger Hollis a British patriot or Soviet spy?|website=The Institute of World Politics|date=21 April 2015|accessdate=18 June 2015}}</ref> One panel member, later wrote that "our panel solved nothing" perhaps because "facts have gradually blurred with supposition and theory".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fbistudies.com/2015/04/27/was-roger-hollis-a-british-patriot-or-soviet-spy/ |title=Was Roger Hollis a British patriot or Soviet spy? |date=27 April 2015 |publisher=FBI Studies |access-date=7 January 2018 |quote=}}</ref>


A former KGB head of station in London, [[Oleg Gordievsky]] who defected to Britain in 1985, said "that Hollis was innocent and said of Wright's book, there was 'a lot of fantasy in it and malicious speculation'", according to a 1990 review of Gordievsky book by ''[[The Washington Post]]''.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1990/02/28/double-agent-gordievsky-tells-all-about-soviets-for-britains-mi6-or-does-he/2ed06b92-8ba0-4e26-94e0-044412d20559/ |title=DOUBLE AGENT GORDIEVSKY TELLS ALL ABOUT SOVIETS FOR BRITAIN'S MI6, OR DOES HE? |date=28 February 1990 |work=Washington Post |access-date=31 December 2020 |quote=}}</ref>
A former KGB head of station in London, Oleg Gordievsky defected to Britain in 1985 had said that Hollis was innocent and said of Wright's book, "there was a lot of fantasy in it and malicious speculation".<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1990/02/28/double-agent-gordievsky-tells-all-about-soviets-for-britains-mi6-or-does-he/2ed06b92-8ba0-4e26-94e0-044412d20559/ |title=Double Agent Gordievsky Tells All About Soviets for Britain’s MI6, or Does He? |date=28 February 1990 |work=Washington Post |access-date=31 December 2020 |quote=}}</ref>


The official [[MI5]] website denies that Hollis was a Soviet agent, adding:<blockquote>''Hollis' non-involvement with the Soviets was confirmed in the 1980s by a senior KGB defector, Oleg Gordievsky. He has described how the Soviets themselves were baffled by the allegations against Hollis''<ref>[https://www.mi5.gov.uk/home/about-us/faqs-about-mi5/was-the-former-head-of-mi5-a-soviet-agent.html MI5 website]; accessed 8 August 2014.</ref></blockquote>
The official MI5 website denies that Hollis was a Soviet agent, adding:<blockquote>"Hollis' non-involvement with the Soviets was confirmed in the 1980s by a senior KGB defector, Oleg Gordievsky. He has described how the Soviets themselves were baffled by the allegations against Hollis."<ref>[https://www.mi5.gov.uk/home/about-us/faqs-about-mi5/was-the-former-head-of-mi5-a-soviet-agent.html MI5 website]; accessed 8 August 2014.</ref></blockquote>


==Family==
==Family==
Hollis married Evelyn Swayne on 17 July 1937 at Wells Cathedral, with his father performing the ceremony. She was the daughter of a solicitor from [[Burnham-on-Sea]] in [[Somerset]]. The couple had one son, [[Adrian Hollis|Adrian Swayne Hollis]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/adrian-hollis-classics-don-and-chess-grandmaster-8544734.html |title=Adrian Hollis: Classics don and chess grandmaster: obituary in The Independent |date=2013-03-14 |accessdate=2013-03-26|newspaper=The Independent}}</ref>
Hollis married Evelyn Swayne on 17 July 1937 at Wells Cathedral, with his father performing the ceremony. She was the daughter of a solicitor from [[Burnham-on-Sea]] in [[Somerset]]. The couple had one son, [[Adrian Hollis]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/adrian-hollis-classics-don-and-chess-grandmaster-8544734.html |title=Adrian Hollis: Classics don and chess grandmaster: obituary in The Independent |date=14 March 2013|accessdate=26 March 2013|newspaper=The Independent}}</ref>


Hollis's son, Adrian (1940–2013), was a classical scholar and [[Grandmaster (chess)|Grandmaster]] of [[correspondence chess]], and was British Correspondence Chess Champion in 1966, 1967 and 1971.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/adrian-hollis-classics-don-and-chess-grandmaster-8544734.html|title=Adrian Hollis: Classics don and chess grandmaster|date=21 March 2013|work=The Independent}}</ref> Philosopher [[Martin Hollis (philosopher)|Martin Hollis]] (1938–1998) was his nephew.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/obituary-professor-martin-hollis-1149574.html|title=Obituary: Professor Martin Hollis|date=11 March 1998|work=The Independent}}</ref> His elder brother, [[Christopher Hollis]] (1902–1977), was a Conservative MP for [[Devizes]] from 1945–55.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1977/05/09/archives/christopher-hollis-75-british-writer-and-mp.html|title=Christopher Hollis, 75; British write and M.P.|date=9 May 1977|work=New York Times}}</ref> His nephew, Rt Rev [[Crispian Hollis]], is a [[Roman Catholic]] bishop.<ref>[https://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-31207/version/8 "Hollis, Rt Rev. (Roger Francis) Crispian", ''Who's Who'', A & C Black]</ref>
Hollis's son, Adrian (1940–2013), was a classical scholar and [[Grandmaster (chess)|Grandmaster]] of [[correspondence chess]], and was British Correspondence Chess Champion in 1966, 1967 and 1971.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/adrian-hollis-classics-don-and-chess-grandmaster-8544734.html|title=Adrian Hollis: Classics don and chess grandmaster|date=21 March 2013|work=The Independent}}</ref> Philosopher [[Martin Hollis (philosopher)|Martin Hollis]] (1938–1998) was his nephew.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/obituary-professor-martin-hollis-1149574.html|title=Obituary: Professor Martin Hollis|date=11 March 1998|work=The Independent}}</ref> His elder brother, [[Christopher Hollis (politician)|Christopher Hollis]] (1902–1977), was a Conservative MP for [[Devizes]] from 1945 to 1955.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1977/05/09/archives/christopher-hollis-75-british-writer-and-mp.html|title=Christopher Hollis, 75; British write and M.P.|date=9 May 1977|work=New York Times}}</ref> His nephew, Rt Rev [[Crispian Hollis]], a Catholic convert, was the [[Roman Catholic Bishop of Portsmouth]].<ref>[https://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-31207/version/8 "Hollis, Rt Rev. (Roger Francis) Crispian", ''Who's Who'', A & C Black]. Accessed 6 January 2023.</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 19:48, 5 April 2024

Sir Roger Hollis
Born2 December 1905
Died26 October 1973(1973-10-26) (aged 67)
Catcott, Somerset
NationalityBritish
Alma materWorcester College, Oxford
OccupationIntelligence officer
AwardsKBE, CB
Espionage activity
AllegianceUnited Kingdom
Service branchMI5
Service years1938–1965
RankDirector General of MI5

Sir Roger Henry Hollis KBE CB (2 December 1905 – 26 October 1973) was a British intelligence officer who served with MI5 from 1938 to 1965. He was Director General of MI5 from 1956 to 1965.

Some commentators, including the journalist Chapman Pincher and intelligence officer Peter Wright, suggested that Hollis was a Soviet agent. In his book The Defence of the Realm: The Authorized History of MI5 (2009), the Cambridge historian Christopher Andrew rejects this theory.

The government's official position, first stated by Margaret Thatcher, is that there was no evidence that Hollis was a traitor.[1]

Early years, family, and education[edit]

Hollis's father, the Right Reverend George Hollis, was Bishop of Taunton. His mother was the daughter of a Canon of Wells Cathedral.[2] Hollis was educated at Clifton College, Bristol.[3] From 1924 to the spring of 1926, he attended Worcester College, Oxford, where he read English, but left without completing his degree.[2] At Oxford he was part of the Hypocrites' Club.[4]

Professional career[edit]

From the spring of 1926 into 1927, he was a clerk for the Standard Chartered Bank in London.[5] In early 1927, he went to Hong Kong as a freelance journalist, then moved to Shanghai. From 1 April 1928, he worked for British American Tobacco. In 1930, he transferred to Beijing.[6]

In June 1938, he joined MI5 F Division (Countersubversion). Many departments of MI5, including F Division, moved from London to Blenheim Palace, Oxfordshire, during World War II, due to threat of bombing.[7] From 1953 to 1956, Hollis was MI5 Deputy Director General under Dick White, succeeding White in 1956 and remaining in that post until his retirement in 1965.[8]

Mole suspicions[edit]

During his life[edit]

After Kim Philby's flight from Beirut to Moscow in 1963, rumours began to circulate that Hollis had alerted him to his impending arrest. Hollis was criticised for not alerting John Profumo, the War Secretary in Prime Minister Harold Macmillan's Conservative government, that he might have become entangled with a Soviet spy ring through his friendship with Stephen Ward and his affair with showgirl Christine Keeler, who was introduced by Ward to Profumo. Soviet Naval Attache Eugene Ivanov was also involved with Keeler at this time, in the early 1960s, and sought to learn the date of American plans to arm nuclear warheads in West Germany, from Profumo through Keeler. Profumo had to resign in mid-1963, and the resulting scandal did much to bring the Labour Party to power in the October 1964 General Election.[9]

During the 1950s and 1960s, a large number of MI5 operations failed in circumstances that suggested the Soviets had been tipped off. Although many such failures were subsequently blamed on the actions of such self-confessed or defected agents as Philby, Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt, a number of failures occurred after all three had lost their access to secret information. Some in MI5 concluded the Soviets had an agent in a very senior position within the organisation. Peter Wright, Arthur S. Martin, Jane Sissmore and others became convinced that either Hollis or his deputy, Graham Mitchell, could be the only ones responsible, eventually confiding their suspicions to Dick White, director general of MI6. White instructed Martin to inform Hollis that Mitchell was a suspect, and Hollis instructed Martin (after due consideration) to keep Mitchell under surveillance. Author Nigel West implies that this was a deliberate ploy to keep tabs on both Mitchell and Hollis.[10]

Martin eventually became so disgruntled and outspoken about Hollis's attitude toward the investigation that Hollis suspended Martin for a fortnight, and the case was turned over to Wright. Much of the investigation was centred around interviews with Anthony Blunt at that time, and Wright had amassed a sizable amount of taped evidence from Blunt when Martin returned from suspension. After 1964, Blunt gradually confessed his double-agent role in exchange for immunity from prosecution.[11]

Eventually the operation wound down. By then, some time after Hollis had retired, suspicion had shifted from Mitchell to Hollis. New Director General Martin Furnival Jones refused to sanction an investigation into Hollis. Mole Hunt (Chapter 3, page 45) noted that the investigative team known as FLUENCY had been disbanded before any conclusions had been reached.[10]

Posthumous[edit]

In 1984, investigative journalist Chapman Pincher published Too Secret Too Long, a book which examined the early life of Hollis and his MI5 career drawing upon new sources and upon many interviews with retired intelligence personnel. Pincher published a revised edition in 2009. Pincher also accused Hollis of being a Soviet agent, although separate from the Cambridge Five spy ring. Pincher claims Hollis was recruited by Richard Sorge in China in the early 1930s to spy for the GRU. Evidence has been advanced to support these assertions by Pincher in his book, Treachery: Betrayals, Blunders, and Cover-ups: Six Decades of Espionage Against America and Great Britain, which is devoted to positing that Hollis was "Elli", the highly placed mole within MI5 identified by Igor Gouzenko, and operating as a Soviet agent from the 1940s until retiring from MI5.[12] In its obituary of Pincher, The Times discredited the journalist's conspiracy theory ("Paranoia Hollisiensis") and specified that Hollis had not been a Soviet spy.[13]

Under Furnival Jones, the higher management of MI5 expressed indignation and loss of morale about the Hollis affair. Hollis was asked to come in and clear up the allegations. Having been the director, Hollis was aware of the procedures of the interrogation and investigation. He remained calm and composed throughout, denying all allegations. Martin and Wright and the team were unable to convince anyone else in MI5 or MI6 that they were right about Hollis. Wright retired in January 1976, upon reaching age 60 and, by his own account, was enraged at being denied a pension for his 30 years of service, on highly legalistic and technical grounds. He emigrated to Tasmania, Australia, where he wrote an account of his work at MI5. Despite attempts by Margaret Thatcher's government to suppress the publication and distribution of Spycatcher, it was finally published in 1987 and eventually sold over two million copies around the world.[14]

Wright alleges in Spycatcher that Gouzenko, who had worked for the GRU, himself deduced later that his interviewer might have been a Soviet double agent and was probably afraid that he might recognise him from case photos that Gouzenko might have seen in KGB or GRU files, hence the disguise. Gouzenko also admitted that he, being a lower level clerk, had no access to such files.[15]

The accuracy of various allegations made in the book by Wright was questioned in a review of Spycatcher published by the Center for the Study of Intelligence, an in-house think tank for the CIA. While admitting (on page 42) that the book included "factual data", the document stated that it was also "filled with [unspecified] errors, exaggerations, bogus ideas, and self-inflation". The review added (on page 45) that "Gen. Oleg Kalugin, former Chief of Counterintelligence" had confirmed to the author that Hollis had not worked for the KGB.[16]

Peter Wright had given a televised interview in 1984 during the dispute with Thatcher's government. Following the interview, in July 1984, Martin wrote a letter to The Times. In it, he stated that while Wright exaggerated the certainty with which they regarded Hollis's guilt, Wright was justified in saying that Hollis was the most likely candidate, for the reasons Wright had cited. In her 2001 autobiography, Christine Keeler (John Profumo's mistress), alleged, without supporting evidence, that Hollis and Stephen Ward were part of a spy ring with Sir Anthony Blunt. Ward had committed suicide on 3 August 1963 as the Profumo scandal progressed.[17] In Keeler's updated book, Secrets and Lies, published in 2012, Keeler stated she saw Hollis visiting Ward five times at the house she shared with Ward.[18]

In his book, The Defence of the Realm: The Authorized History of MI5, a Cambridge professor, Christopher Andrew, used access to 400,000 MI5 files to compile an official history of the service. He claims he has proved conclusively that Hollis was not a double agent and that Wright was misguided at best.[19]

Paul Monk, an Australian former senior intelligence analyst and author of the argument maps used in the Institute of World Politics panel, provides a counterpoint to the Authorized History.[20] He believes Andrew dismisses Wright's claims almost ad hominem but fails to address the specific points made by Pincher in his final (2009) book on the subject.[21] He describes Andrew's description of Hollis's background as – in light of the allegations made against him – "insouciant". Monk feels that as Andrew is arguing that Hollis is innocent, he should have given Hollis the vetting he did not receive when he entered MI5, particularly in light of Hollis's relationships with confirmed Soviet assets, regardless of whether he was one of them. Monk discusses at length the flaws of the book, for example, the notion that Leo Long was definitely ELLI. This is supposedly disproved by KGB archives – Long is thought to be RALPH – and solely supported by the later questioned testimony of Gordievsky.[20] He surmises with the following

Christopher Andrew treads a well-worn path in failing utterly to address that case, much less refute it once and for all.[21]

In the 2009 ITV programme, Inside MI5: The Real Spooks, Oleg Gordievsky recounted how he saw the head of the British section of the KGB, expressing surprise at the allegations that he read in a British newspaper about Hollis being a KGB agent, saying "Why is it they are speaking about Roger Hollis, such nonsense, can't understand it, it must be some special English trick directed against us."[22]

In 2010, Stephen de Mowbray who worked for MI6 until 1979, stated that both Hollis and Mitchell had been exonerated. "We followed Mitchell all over the place ... Nothing was found. Next Hollis was investigated but eventually also cleared. There were suspicions with both of them. There are not suspicions now. But somebody was doing it."[23]

On 21 April 2015, the Institute of World Politics held a panel debating whether or not Hollis was a mole. They published a report and chronology.[24] One panel member, later wrote that "our panel solved nothing" perhaps because "facts have gradually blurred with supposition and theory".[25]

A former KGB head of station in London, Oleg Gordievsky defected to Britain in 1985 had said that Hollis was innocent and said of Wright's book, "there was a lot of fantasy in it and malicious speculation".[26]

The official MI5 website denies that Hollis was a Soviet agent, adding:

"Hollis' non-involvement with the Soviets was confirmed in the 1980s by a senior KGB defector, Oleg Gordievsky. He has described how the Soviets themselves were baffled by the allegations against Hollis."[27]

Family[edit]

Hollis married Evelyn Swayne on 17 July 1937 at Wells Cathedral, with his father performing the ceremony. She was the daughter of a solicitor from Burnham-on-Sea in Somerset. The couple had one son, Adrian Hollis.[28]

Hollis's son, Adrian (1940–2013), was a classical scholar and Grandmaster of correspondence chess, and was British Correspondence Chess Champion in 1966, 1967 and 1971.[29] Philosopher Martin Hollis (1938–1998) was his nephew.[30] His elder brother, Christopher Hollis (1902–1977), was a Conservative MP for Devizes from 1945 to 1955.[31] His nephew, Rt Rev Crispian Hollis, a Catholic convert, was the Roman Catholic Bishop of Portsmouth.[32]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Documents show that former MI5 chief Sir Roger Hollis was not a traitor". The Times. 24 October 2008. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  2. ^ a b Pincher, 1984, p. 14
  3. ^ "Clifton College Register" Muirhead, J.A.O. p367: Bristol; J.W Arrowsmith for Old Cliftonian Society; April, 1948
  4. ^ Pincher, Chapman (2009). Treachery: Betrayals, Blunders, and Cover-ups: Six Decades of Espionage Against America and Great Britain. Random House Publishing Group. p. 27. ISBN 9781588368591. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
  5. ^ Pincher, 1984, p. 17
  6. ^ Dimitrakis, Panagiotis (2017). Secret War for China: Espionage, Revolution and the Rise of Mao. IB Taurus. ISBN 978-1784539030.
  7. ^ "MI5 In World War II – MI5 – The Security Service". www.mi5.gov.uk. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  8. ^ "Spy scandals rock Britain". UPI. 28 March 1981. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  9. ^ "15 October 1964 General Election". BBC. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  10. ^ a b West, Nigel (1987). Mole Hunt. London: Guild Publishing. p. 45. ASIN B001N3IV22.
  11. ^ "Anthony Blunt: confessions of spy who passed secrets to Russia during the war". The Telegraph. 22 July 2009. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  12. ^ Tyrer, William A. (2016). "The Unresolved Mystery of ELLI". International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence. 29 (4): 785–808. doi:10.1080/08850607.2016.1177404. S2CID 156338017.
  13. ^ Macintyre, Ben (8 August 2014). "The mole hunter who caught a red herring". The Times. Retrieved 30 December 2020. for much of his life he suffered from an incurable form of conspiracy disease, a highly contagious condition that he caught from Peter Wright of Spycatcher fame.
  14. ^ "Newspapers win Spycatcher battle". The Guardian. 14 October 1988. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  15. ^ "Igor Gouzenko, an obscure Russian cipher clerk whose defection..." UPI. 29 June 1982. Retrieved 17 June 2018.
  16. ^ "Of Moles and Molehunters: A Review of Counterintelligence Literature, 1977-92" (PDF). Center for the Study of Intelligence. 1 October 1993. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 December 2011. Retrieved 30 December 2020. CSI 93-002
  17. ^ Knightley and Kennedy, pp. 243–247
  18. ^ Keeler, p.77
  19. ^ Andrew, Christoper (2009). The Defence of the Realm The Authorized History of MI5. Penguin. pp. 517–521. ISBN 978-0-14-102330-4.
  20. ^ a b Monk; Wilhelm (2015). "British Patriot or Soviet Spy? Clarifying A Major Cold War Mystery" (PDF). The Institute of World Politics. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 February 2020.
  21. ^ a b "Christopher Andrew and the Strange Case of Roger Hollis – Quadrant Online". quadrant.org.au. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
  22. ^ Inside MI5: The Real Spooks (ITV 2009), youtube.com; accessed 3 April 2016.
  23. ^ "Behind a bittersweet industry". BBC News. 26 January 2010. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  24. ^ "Was Roger Hollis a British patriot or Soviet spy?". The Institute of World Politics. 21 April 2015. Retrieved 18 June 2015.
  25. ^ "Was Roger Hollis a British patriot or Soviet spy?". FBI Studies. 27 April 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2018.
  26. ^ "Double Agent Gordievsky Tells All About Soviets for Britain's MI6, or Does He?". Washington Post. 28 February 1990. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
  27. ^ MI5 website; accessed 8 August 2014.
  28. ^ "Adrian Hollis: Classics don and chess grandmaster: obituary in The Independent". The Independent. 14 March 2013. Retrieved 26 March 2013.
  29. ^ "Adrian Hollis: Classics don and chess grandmaster". The Independent. 21 March 2013.
  30. ^ "Obituary: Professor Martin Hollis". The Independent. 11 March 1998.
  31. ^ "Christopher Hollis, 75; British write and M.P." New York Times. 9 May 1977.
  32. ^ "Hollis, Rt Rev. (Roger Francis) Crispian", Who's Who, A & C Black. Accessed 6 January 2023.

Sources[edit]

External links[edit]

Government offices
Preceded by Director General of MI5
1956–1965
Succeeded by