Dilemma (chess)
The dilemma ( chess motif , namely a multiple repetition of a deduction chess. In a sequence of chess bids and deduction chess you win material. The expression was introduced by Aaron Nimzowitsch in 1925 for this combination motif. A dilemma is very rare in tournament practice.
) is a specialThe term chess is derived from the dilemma in the game of the mill .
Party chess
The dilemma became famous through the game Torre - Lasker , Moscow 1925. Here, after Schwarz's 24th move, the following position was created:
Moscow 1925
a | b | c | d | e | f | G | H | ||
8th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
8th |
7th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
7th |
6th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6th |
5 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 |
4th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4th |
3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 |
2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |
1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
a | b | c | d | e | f | G | H |
At first glance, White is in trouble. The tied bishop on g5 is attacked, if he moves away the queen is lost to Qxh5 .
Torre still played 25. Bf6! with the double attack Qxb5 and Rxg7 +. After the forced
25.… Qxh5
26. Rxg7 + a dilemma has arisen .
Moscow 1925
a | b | c | d | e | f | G | H | ||
8th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
8th |
7th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
7th |
6th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6th |
5 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 |
4th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4th |
3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 |
2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |
1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
a | b | c | d | e | f | G | H |
26 ... Kh8 only train
27 Txf7 + deduction chess
27 ... Kg8 only train
28 Rg7 + Kh8
29 Txb7 + Kg8
30 Rg7 + Kh8 Torre waived Txa7 + to the black tower not to bring into play on a8.
31. Rg5 + now he's still picking up the queen from Kh7 . The dilemma is over.
32.Rxh5 Kg6
33.Rh3 Kxf6
34.Rxh6 + White now has three more pawns . Lasker continued to play a few moves and gave up on move 43.
The second example is a real chess classic from 1956: the so-called " Game of the Century ".
a | b | c | d | e | f | G | H | ||
8th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
8th |
7th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
7th |
6th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6th |
5 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 |
4th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4th |
3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 |
2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |
1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
a | b | c | d | e | f | G | H |
18.… Bxc4 + 19. Kg1 Ne2 + 20. Kf1 Nxd4 + 21. Kg1 Ne2 + 22. Kf1 Nc3 + 23. Kg1 axb6 and Black won later.
After a previous queen sacrifice on b6 follows a series of checks by the black bishop and the withdrawing knight , whereby the white king can only alternate between two squares, a typical dilemma.
The quandary as a tactical motive not only serves as a mate attack on the opposing king, but the queen can also be the target piece or it serves to exclude an opposing piece from the defense.
Problem chess
The following is an example from chess composition in which the series of deduction chess inevitably lead to mate . The position is undoubtedly characterized by the black pawn chain along the large diagonal.
(6081) The Swallow 02/1940
a | b | c | d | e | f | G | H | ||
8th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
8th |
7th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
7th |
6th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6th |
5 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 |
4th | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4th |
3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 |
2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |
1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
a | b | c | d | e | f | G | H |
Solution: |
1.Ra2! (threatens 2nd Bxb6 + together with 3rd Bc7 #) |
1.… Bh2 2. Bxb6 + Kb8 3. Ba7 + Ka8 4. Bxc5 + Kb8 5. Ba7 + Ka8 6. Bxd4 + Kb8 7. Ba7 + Ka8 8. Bxe3 + Kb8 9. Ba7 + Ka8 10. Bxf2 + Kb8 11. Ba7 + Ka8 12. Bg1 + Kb8 13. Bxh2 # |
Consecutive mutual chess commandments of the tower by deduction of the runner and the runner itself through adjustment of the lanyard.
Web links
- Herderschach training material No. 39
- Further problems related to the dilemma on the PDB server
- The Chess Seesaw by Edward Winter
Individual evidence
- ^ A b Ernst Bönsch: Small Lexicon of Chess. The royal game from exchange to draft , Sportverlag, Berlin 1988. ISBN 3-328-00233-2 , p. 125.
- ↑ Aaron Nimzowitsch: My system: A textbook of the game of chess on a completely new basis , Schachversand E. Niggemann, Heiden 2010. ISBN 3-942383-60-8 , pp. 187f.
- ^ Partie Karakas - Semjonowa , Budapest 1980. Accessed November 6, 2012.
- ^ Partie Schneider - Lund , Karlskrona 1983. Accessed on November 6, 2012.
- ↑ Karl Fabel: Kurioses Schach , Südwest-Schachreihe vol. 2, 2nd unchanged edition, Walter Rau Verlag, Düsseldorf and Kempten 1972, pp. 12-13.