Talk:Unicode and Iron Bowl: Difference between pages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
infobox
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Sports rivalry
{{talkheader}}
| title=Iron Bowl
{{WikiProject Typography|class=B|importance=mid}}
| teamAlogo=[[Image:Irnbowllogo.jpg]]
{{FAOL|Russian|ru:Юникод}}
|firstmeeting=February 22, 1893<br />38–22, AUB
{{archivebox|auto=yes}}
| mostrecent=November 24, 2007<br />17–10, AUB
| nextmeeting=November 29, 2008<br />AUB at ALA
| total=72
| series=38–33–1, ALA
|largestvictory=December 4, 1948<br />55–0, ALA
}}
The '''Iron Bowl''' is the name given to the annual intercollegiate [[American football|football]] game between the teams of [[University of Alabama]]. and the [[Auburn University]]. The deep-seated football rivalry between Alabama and Auburn has historically spilled over into the politics and society of the state of [[Alabama]]. As is typical of such games, it is usually scheduled to be the final regular-season game for each team and is always played in late November. In a survey done by [[Sports Illustrated]] it ranked #2 after [[Yankees–Red Sox rivalry|Boston Red Sox-New York Yankees]] as the greatest rivalry.{{Fact|date=November 2007}} [[ESPNU]] ranked the rivalry #1 in their ''Top Ten College Football Rivalries''.<ref name="GreatestCollegeRivalries">{{cite web |url=http://www.collegenews.org/x7359.xml |title=ESPNU's Top Ten College Football Rivalries |accessdate=2007-11-25 |work=College News }}</ref> Alabama leads the series 38–33–1. The longest streak of the series was a nine game winning streak by Alabama from 1973–1981.


The games are played at [[Bryant-Denny Stadium]] in [[Tuscaloosa, Alabama|Tuscaloosa]] every even-numbered year and at [[Jordan-Hare Stadium]] in [[Auburn, Alabama|Auburn]] every odd-numbered year. For much of the twentieth century the game was played every year in Birmingham. In 2007, the Iron Bowl was pushed back a week, to [[Thanksgiving]] weekend. It will remain that weekend in 2008.
== IPA and Unicode ==


==History==
Hi, Unicode 5.0 is now out. Does anyone know if the [[International Phonetic Alphabet|IPA]] character for the [[labiodental flap]] ([[Image:Labiodental flap (Gentium).png|25px]]) has been incorporated into the latest version of the Unicode standard? Thank you. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 18:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Alabama and Auburn played their first football game in Lakeview Park in [[Birmingham, Alabama]] on [[February 22]], [[1893]]. Auburn won 32–22, before an estimated crowd of 2,000. As if a signal of the future, disagreement between the schools began immediately as Alabama considered the game to be the final matchup of the 1892 season and Auburn recorded it as the first of 1893. The series was suspended after the 1907 game when the schools could not come to agreement over the amount of expenses to be paid players, as well as from where officials for the game should be obtained.
:It hans't been incorporated yet. [http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=SILPUAassignments SIL Corporate PUA Assignments] say it's to be included in a later version, and [http://www.unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html Proposed New Characters: Pipeline Table] mentions it's still in the pipeline. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 16:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
::It's in Unicode 5.1.0 now. --'''[[User:Kjoonlee|Kjoon]]'''[[User talk:Kjoonlee|lee]] 09:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


In 1947 the Alabama House of Representatives passed a resolution encouraging the schools to "make possible the inauguration of a full athletic program between the two schools".<ref>{{cite web | year=2006 | url=http://www.coloradotigers.com/concourse/traditions_ironbowl.htm | title=The Auburn-Alabama Rivalry, "The Iron Bowl" | publisher=Rocky Mountain Auburn Club | accessdate=2006-12-04}}</ref>. Auburn president Dr. Ralph B. Draughon and Alabama president Dr. John Gallalee decided during the winter and spring of 1948 to end the disagreement and renew the series. The games would be played in [[Birmingham]] because it had the largest stadium in the state, 44,000-seat [[Legion Field]], and the tickets would be split evenly between the two schools. Alabama won the first game when the series renewed 55-0, the most lopsided victory of the series.
== email and japanese ==


By 1980 the series had come to be called the Iron Bowl, due to [[Birmingham|Birmingham’s]] prominence as a center of [[iron]] and [[steel]] production. Throughout the 1980s, Auburn made additions to [[Jordan-Hare Stadium]], and in 1987, it eclipsed [[Legion Field]] in size. Auburn desired to make the Iron Bowl a “home-and-home” series, and the schools reached an agreement where Auburn could play their home games for the Iron Bowl in Auburn starting in 1989 (except for the 1991 game, which was played at [[Legion Field]]), and Alabama would have a "home" ticket allocation for games in [[Legion Field]]. On [[December 2]], [[1989]], Alabama came to Auburn's [[Jordan-Hare Stadium]] for the first time in the history of the rivalry. A sellout crowd would witness Auburn win its first true "home" game of the series, 30–20 over an Alabama team that entered the game unbeaten and ranked #2 in the country.
i dont know if this is a unicode thing but when somebody sends me japanese characters i get stuff i cant read but if i send that email again to a system that uses that set it still translates it right(eg a mobile phone(jp version) would be good to add a link on the unicode page that leads to programs that translate these characters back to japanese and a webbased sollution too. [[User:124.102.32.2|124.102.32.2]] 04:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


Alabama continued to hold their home game at [[Legion Field]]. In 1998, Alabama expanded [[Bryant-Denny Stadium]] to a capacity of 83,818, exceeding [[Legion Field]] by a few hundred. Alabama moved their home games in the series to [[Bryant-Denny Stadium]] in 2000, only the third time the Iron Bowl was played in [[Tuscaloosa, Alabama|Tuscaloosa]], and the first time since 1901. A new attendance record for the Iron Bowl was set in 2006 as the latest expansion to [[Bryant-Denny Stadium]] increased its capacity to 92,138.
: It's probably written in a standard your system isn't set up to read properly. [[User:Wakuran|惑乱 分からん]] 16:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


==Foy-ODK Sportsmanship Award==
== Normalization? ==
The [[trophy]] given to the winner of the game is the [[Foy-ODK Sportsmanship Award]]. It is named after James E. Foy, an Alabama graduate and former Auburn dean of students and [[Omicron Delta Kappa]] Honor Society – which was established on both campuses during the 1920s. The Foy Trophy is presented at halftime of the Auburn–Alabama basketball game later in the same academic year at the winner's coliseum. After the trophy presentation, the SGA President of the losing school must recite his or her adversary's fight song.


==Famous moments==
The article mentions normalization, but it doesn't explain what normalization <em>is</em> in this context.<small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.85.157.177|217.85.157.177]] ([[User talk:217.85.157.177|talk]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP -->
With a rivalry of this stature, there are a number of games and moments that define the rivalry.
:Ah, er, ... no, it doesn't. does it. And it should, shouldn't it.
:I'll create a section on normalization in a few days, unless someone beats me to it. Cheers, [[User:Chris Chittleborough|CWC]]<small>[[User talk:Chris Chittleborough|(talk)]]</small> 17:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


'''1964 – National Television'''
:The Iron Bowl was first broadcasted nationally on [[November 26]], [[1964]]. [[Joe Namath]] led Alabama to a 21–14 victory over Auburn, and Alabama would go on to win its 7th national championship.


'''1967 – The Run in the mud'''
== Weasel words Issues section? ==
:On a stormy night in 1967, Alabama quarterback [[Kenny Stabler]] ran for a 53&nbsp;yard touchdown to give Bama a 7–3 win.


'''1972 – [[Punt Bama Punt]]'''
Do some of the descriptions in the Issues section sound like weasel words to anyone else? Specifically, I mean the phrases like "Some Japanese computer programmers object to Unicode" and (especially) "Some have decried Unicode as a plot against Asian cultures perpetrated by Westerners..." I had added the weasel tag but it was quickly removed by someone and I was cited for vandalism - I swear, I'm not trying to mess around with anything. But that section definitely has quite a bit of "some X say" and "it is claimed that," etc.
:Trailing 16–3 with 6&nbsp;minutes left, Auburn blocked and scored on two Alabama punts to win the game 17–16.


'''1981 – 315'''
I don't actually know anything about the debates surrounding those issues themselves (I was just browsing to learn about Unicode) so I don't know how those phrases should be corrected, but my impression is that one can add a tag there to signal for other people who might know better about how to clarify?
:Alabama Coach [[Paul "Bear" Bryant]] got his 315th career victory to pass [[Amos Alonzo Stagg]] to become the all-time winningest Division I-A coach in a 28–17 win over Auburn.


'''1982 – Bo Over the Top'''
[[User:Ywong137|Yishan]] 03:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
:Auburn drove the field and scored with 2&nbsp;minutes left when [[Bo Jackson]] jumped over the top of the pile on the one yard line. Auburn won the game 23–22.


'''1985 – Van Tiffin's Kick'''
:I've just edited that section to add some references, which might be helpful. There was some opposition to Unicode 5-10 years ago, mostly from Japan, but not much was written about it in English. Those statements ("Some Japanese computer programmers object to Unicode", "Some have decried Unicode as a plot against Asian cultures perpetrated by Westerners...") are a bit 'weaselly', but they're also perfectly accurate as far as I know, and they're probably the best we can do with English-language sources. I hope this helps, [[User talk:Chris Chittleborough|CWC]] 09:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
:Trailing 23-22 with only 57 seconds remaining, Alabama quarterback [[Mike Shula]] and the Tide offense drove 65 yards in the final 57 seconds, to set up a 53-yard field goal by [[Van Tiffin]], winning the game 25–23 as time expired.


'''1989 – First Time Ever'''
::Were not some of the Tron links very explicitly against Unicode from a Japanese perspective? If someone wants to unweasel the text, I think some of the links at [[Han_unification]] may help. [[User:Mlewan|Mlewan]] 11:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
:In the first game ever played in Auburn, the Tigers beat #2 Alabama 30–20.


'''1994 – Battle of The South's Unbeatens'''
== Suggest merge ==
:10-0 Alabama (#3 AP) defeated 9–0–1 Auburn (#6 AP) 21–14 in a matchup of undefeated teams, snapping Auburn's 21-game unbeaten streak.


'''1999 – Saturday Morning Virgin'''
I suggested to merge [[Unicode roadmap]] into this article. Anyone oppose? --[[User talk:Sl|<big>&#9993;</big> Hello World!]] 09:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
:Alabama gets their first win ever at Auburn, 28–17.
*Looks like a good move to me. [[User talk:Chris Chittleborough|CWC]] 18:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


==Game results==
== Missing history ==
{| id="toc" style="float:right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: center"
|+ <big><strong> Iron Bowl</strong></big>
|-
! Alabama (38) || Auburn (33)
|-
|valign="top"| 1894 1903<br/>1905 1906<br/>1948 1950<br/>1951 1952<br/>1953 1959<br/>1960 1961<br/>1962 1964<br/>1965 1966<br/>1967 1968<br/>1971 1973<br/>1974 1975<br/>1976 1977<br/>1978 1979<br/>1980 1981<br/>1984 1985<br/>1990 1991<br/>1992 1994<br/>1996 1998<br/>1999 2001
|valign="top"| 1893 ''(Feb. & Nov.)''<br/>1895 1900<br/>1901 1902<br/>1904 1949<br/>1954 1955<br/>1956 1957<br/>1958 1963<br/>1969 1970<br/>1972 1982<br/>1983 1986<br/>1987 1988<br/>1989 1993<br/>1995 1997<br/>2000 2002<br/>2003 2004<br/>2005 2006<br/>2007
|-
!colspan="2"| Ties (1)
|-
|colspan="2"| 1907
|}
Since 1893, The Crimson Tide and Tigers have played 72 times. Alabama leads the all-time series, with 38 wins to Auburn's 33, with one tie.<ref name="SeriesHistory">{{cite web |url=http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/sec/alabama/opponents_records.php?teamid=220 |title=Alabama vs. Auburn series history |accessdate=2007-09-30 |work=College Football Data Warehouse }}</ref> The game has been played in four cities: [[Auburn, Alabama|Auburn]], [[Birmingham, Alabama|Birmingham]], [[Montgomery, Alabama|Montgomery]], and [[Tuscaloosa, Alabama|Tuscaloosa]]. Alabama leads the series in Birmingham (34-18-1). Auburn leads the series in Tuscaloosa (6-0-0) and Auburn (7-2-0). The series is tied in Montgomery (2-2-0).


''Alabama victories are shaded <font color="#ffcccc">██</font> light red. Auburn victories shaded in <font color="#ccccff">██</font> light blue.''
Unicode began with the opposition to ISO 10646 and later two party finally reached a consensus and merge into one. Do anyone know about that history? &mdash; [[User:HenryLi|HenryLi]] ([[User talk:HenryLi|Talk]]) 18:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
:There's a little at [[ISO 10646#History of ISO 10646]]. [[User:EdC|EdC]] ([[User talk:EdC|talk]]) 01:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
::That section is short but very informative. Thanks, [[user:EdC|EdC]]. [[User talk:Chris Chittleborough|CWC]] 09:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


{| class="wikitable"
== Clarification Needed: Code Value vs. Code Point -==
!style="background: #e3e3e3;"|No.
!style="background: #e3e3e3;"|Date
!style="background: #e3e3e3;"|Site
!style="background: #e3e3e3;" colspan=2|Winning team
!style="background: #e3e3e3;" colspan=2|Losing team
!style="background: #e3e3e3;"|Series
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|1 || [[1893-02-22]] || [[Birmingham, Alabama|Birmingham]]
|align=left|'''[[Auburn Tigers|Auburn]]''' || '''32'''
|align=left|[[Alabama Crimson Tide|Alabama]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; || 22 || AUB 1-0
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|2 || [[1893-11-30]] || &nbsp;[[Montgomery, Alabama|Montgomery]]&nbsp;
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''40''' || align=left|Alabama || 16 || AUB 2-0
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|3 || [[1894-11-29]] || Montgomery
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''18''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || AUB 2-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|4 || [[1895-11-23]] || [[Tuscaloosa, Alabama|Tuscaloosa]]
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''48''' || align=left|Alabama || 0 || AUB 3-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|5 || [[1900-11-17]] || Montgomery
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''53''' || align=left|Alabama || 5 || AUB 4-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|6 || [[1901-11-15]] || Tuscaloosa
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''17''' || align=left|Alabama || 0 || AUB 5-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|7 || [[1902-10-18]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''23''' || align=left|Alabama || 0 || AUB 6-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|8 || [[1903-10-23]] || Montgomery
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''18''' || align=left|Auburn || 6 || AUB 6-2
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|9 || [[1904-11-12]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''29''' || align=left|Alabama || 5 || AUB 7-2
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|10 || [[1905-11-18]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''30''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || AUB 7-3
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|11 || [[1906-11-17]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''10''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || AUB 7-4
|-align=center
|12 || [[1907-11-16]] || Birmingham
|align=left|Auburn || 6 || align=left|Alabama || 6 || AUB 7-4-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|13 || [[1948-12-04]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''55''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || AUB 7-5-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|14 || [[1949-12-03]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''14''' || align=left|Alabama || 13 || AUB 8-5-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|15 || [[1950-12-02]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''34''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || AUB 8-6-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|16 || [[1951-12-02]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''25''' || align=left|Auburn || 7 || AUB 8-7-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|17 || [[1952-11-29]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''21''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || Tied 8-8-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|18 || [[1953-11-28]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''10''' || align=left|Auburn || 7 || BAMA 9-8-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|19 || [[1954-11-27]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''28''' || align=left|Alabama || 0 || Tied 9-9-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|20 || [[1955-11-26]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''26''' || align=left|Alabama || 0 || AUB 10-9-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|21 || [[1956-12-01]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''34''' || align=left|Alabama || 7 || AUB 11-9-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|22 || [[1957-11-30]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''40''' || align=left|Alabama || 0 || AUB 12-9-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|23 || [[1958-11-29]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''14''' || align=left|Alabama || 8 || AUB 13-9-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|24 || [[1959-11-28]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''10''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || AUB 13-10-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|25 || [[1960-11-26]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''3''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || AUB 13-11-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|26 || [[1961-12-02]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''34''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || AUB 13-12-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|27 || [[1962-12-01]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''38''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || Tied 13-13-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|28 || [[1963-11-30]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''10''' || align=left|Alabama || 8 || AUB 14-13-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|29 || [[1964-11-26]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''21''' || align=left|Auburn || 14 || Tied 14-14-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|30 || [[1965-11-27]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''30''' || align=left|Auburn || 3 || BAMA 15-14-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|31 || [[1966-12-03]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''31''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || BAMA 16-14-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|32 || [[1967-12-02]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''7''' || align=left|Auburn || 3 || BAMA 17-14-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|33 || [[1968-11-30]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''24''' || align=left|Auburn || 16 || BAMA 18-14-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|34 || [[1969-11-29]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''49''' || align=left|Alabama || 26 || BAMA 18-15-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|35 || [[1970-11-28]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''33''' || align=left|Alabama || 28 || BAMA 18-16-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|36 || [[1971-11-27]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''31''' || align=left|Auburn || 7 || BAMA 19-16-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|37 || [[1972-12-02]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''17''' || align=left|Alabama || 16 || BAMA 19-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|38 || [[1973-12-01]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''35''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || BAMA 20-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|39 || [[1974-11-29]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''17''' || align=left|Auburn || 13 || BAMA 21-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|40 || [[1975-11-27]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''28''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || BAMA 22-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|41 || [[1976-11-27]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''38''' || align=left|Auburn || 7 || BAMA 23-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|42 || [[1977-11-26]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''48''' || align=left|Auburn || 21 || BAMA 24-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|43 || [[1978-12-02]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''34''' || align=left|Auburn || 16 || BAMA 25-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|44 || [[1979-12-01]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''25''' || align=left|Auburn || 18 || BAMA 26-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|45 || [[1980-11-29]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''34''' || align=left|Auburn || 18 || BAMA 27-17-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|46 || [[1981-11-28]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''28''' || align=left|Auburn || 17 || BAMA 28-17-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|47 || [[1982-11-27]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''23''' || align=left|Alabama || 22 || BAMA 28-18-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|48 || [[1983-12-03]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''23''' || align=left|Alabama || 20 || BAMA 28-19-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|49 || [[1984-12-01]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''17''' || align=left|Auburn || 15 || BAMA 29-19-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|50 || [[1985-11-30]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''25''' || align=left|Auburn || 23 || BAMA 30-19-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|51 || [[1986-11-29]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''21''' || align=left|Alabama || 17 || BAMA 30-20-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|52 || [[1987-11-27]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''10''' || align=left|Alabama || 0 || BAMA 30-21-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|53 || [[1988-11-25]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''15''' || align=left|Alabama || 10 || BAMA 30-22-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|54 || [[1989-12-02]] || [[Auburn, Alabama|Auburn]]
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''30''' || align=left|Alabama || 20 || BAMA 30-23-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|55 || [[1990-12-01]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''16''' || align=left|Auburn || 7 || BAMA 31-23-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|56 || [[1991-11-30]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''13''' || align=left|Auburn || 6 || BAMA 32-23-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|57 || [[1992-11-26]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''17''' || align=left|Auburn || 0 || BAMA 33-23-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|58 || [[1993-11-20]] || Auburn
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''22''' || align=left|Alabama || 14 || BAMA 33-24-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|59 || [[1994-11-19]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''21''' || align=left|Auburn || 14 || BAMA 34-24-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|60 || [[1995-11-18]] || Auburn
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''31''' || align=left|Alabama || 27 || BAMA 34-25-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|61 || [[1996-11-23]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''24''' || align=left|Auburn || 23 || BAMA 35-25-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|62 || [[1997-11-22]] || Auburn
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''18''' || align=left|Alabama || 17 || BAMA 35-26-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|63 || [[1998-11-21]] || Birmingham
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''31''' || align=left|Auburn || 17 || BAMA 36-26-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|64 || [[1999-11-20]] || Auburn
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''28''' || align=left|Auburn || 17 || BAMA 37-26-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|65 || [[2000-11-18]] || Tuscaloosa
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''9''' || align=left|Alabama || 0 || BAMA 37-27-1
|-style="background: #ffe5e5;" align=center
|66 || [[2001-11-17]] || Auburn
|align=left|'''Alabama''' || '''31''' || align=left|Auburn || 7 || BAMA 38-27-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|67 || [[2002-11-23]] || Tuscaloosa
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''17''' || align=left|Alabama || 7 || BAMA 38-28-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|68 || [[2003-11-22]] || Auburn
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''28''' || align=left|Alabama || 23 || BAMA 38-29-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|69 || [[2004-11-20]] || Tuscaloosa
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''21''' || align=left|Alabama || 13 || BAMA 38-30-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|70 || [[2005-11-19]] || Auburn
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''28''' || align=left|Alabama || 18 || BAMA 38-31-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|71 || [[2006-11-18]] || Tuscaloosa
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''22''' || align=left|Alabama || 15 || BAMA 38-32-1
|-style="background: #e5e5ff;" align=center
|72 || [[2007-11-24]] || Auburn
|align=left|'''Auburn''' || '''17''' || align=left|Alabama || 10 || BAMA 38-33-1
|-align=center
|73 || [[2008-11-29]]<ref name="FutureIronBowls">{{cite web |url=http://www.nationalchamps.net/NCAA/future_schedules/auburn_future.htm |title=Auburn Football Future Schedules |accessdate=2007-11-27 |work=NationalChamps.net }}</ref> || Tuscaloosa
|colspan=4|Auburn at Alabama ||
|-align=center
|74 || [[2009-11-28]]<ref name="FutureIronBowls"/> || Auburn
|colspan=4|Alabama at Auburn ||
|}


==See also==
From the page on Aug 27th, 2007:
*[[List of NCAA college football rivalry games]]


==References==
In UTF-32 and UCS-4, one 32-bit code value serves as a fairly direct representation of any character's code point [...]. In the other cases, each code point may be represented by a variable number of code values.
{{Reflist}}


{{Auburn University}}
Could someone please clarify the distinction between a "code value" and a "code point"? Searching in the text does not clarify the difference. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.118.248.80|68.118.248.80]] ([[User talk:68.118.248.80|talk]]) 05:54, August 27, 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{University of Alabama}}
: I've added the following:
::An encoding maps (possibly a subset of) the range of Unicode ''code points'' to sequences of values in some fixed-size range, termed ''code values''.
:[[User:EdC|EdC]] 12:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


[[Category:Sports in Alabama]]
== One-to-one ==
[[Category:Alabama Crimson Tide football]]

[[Category:Auburn Tigers football]]
According to [[one-to-one]], one-to-one means [[injective]], which can be done between sets of different sizes. It is a bit ambiguous; I learned it as [[bijective]]. It shouldn't just be deleted, but I don't know that injective is clear enough to enough of our readers to be the right word to use here.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] 21:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
[[Category:College football rivalries]]

== Question on carriage returns / line feeds ==

Would some knowledgeable person be willing to comment on whether Unicode resolves the carriage return problem that exists between computer platforms (Apple, PC, Unix)? It was my understanding that Unicode allows a text file to be properly read on all platforms, but I don't know how this works. If Unicode does not resolve this problem, it would be helpful to state this explicitly and refer to the reader to another article that addresses this issue. Regards, [[User:WWriter|WWriter]] ([[User talk:WWriter|talk]]) 17:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
: A text file can be read on any platform, if the user has a program that handles any kind of carriage return. But no, the different standards still prevail. Besides there is a big difference between different text files. A program that reads UTF8 may not be able to read UTF16, and so on. However, that confusion is not as much cross platform as within each platform.
: Is it really necessary to mention that in this article? There is some info at [[Newline#Unicode]]. One could have a reference to it, I guess, but from which section? [[User:Mlewan|Mlewan]] ([[User talk:Mlewan|talk]]) 19:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Unicode does not resolve this issue any more than any other ASCII-based character set does. --[[User:JWB|JWB]] ([[User talk:JWB|talk]]) 21:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Unicode would have made the CR/NL problem even more complicated by adding U+2028 LINE SEPARATOR and U+2029 PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR; however, nobody is using these two characters. — [[User:Monedula|Monedula]] ([[User talk:Monedula|talk]]) 16:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

: It has been a while since this question was posed, but I think the responses do not really directly respond to the question. First, it is important to understand that before Unicode, different OSs and platforms often relied on their own character encodings (apparently finding the ISO standard encodings/character sets inadequate). So independent of the new line issue, Unicode does (to the extent that it is being adopted) supersede all of these other character set / encodings and therefore provides a solution of allowing text files to be read on any platform.

: In terms of the new line, Unicode did introduce U+2028 LINE SEPARATOR and U+2029 PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR as Monedula mentioned. This however was an attempt to provide a Unicode solution to semantically encoding paragraphs and lines: potentially replacing all of the various platform solutions. So in doing so, Unicode does provide a way around the historical platform dependent solutions. However, as Monedula also revealed, few if any Unicode solutions have adopted these Unicode line and paragraph separators as the sole canonical line ending characters. However, a common approach to solving this issue is through new line normalization. This is done with the Cocoa text system in Mac OS X and also with W3C XML and HTML recommendations. In this approach every possible new line character is internally converted to a common new line (which one doesn't really matter since its an internal operation just for rendering). So in other words, regardless of how the line ending is encoded in the text, the text system can treat it as a new line. I hope that clarifies things a bit. [[User:Indexheavy|Indexheavy]] ([[User talk:Indexheavy|talk]]) 21:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

I tried to add a concise section on this issue, with a reference to the Newline#Unicode section. Hope this helps. [[User:WWriter|WWriter]] ([[User talk:WWriter|talk]]) 05:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

==Clarification section==
Somewhere, very early in the article, the following terms must be explained:
* Rows,
* Blocks,
* Planes;
and their interrelationships. I presume ''glyph'' and ''character'' comes that early, but I've not looked. ''<span style="color: #800000; background-color: #FFFFA0; padding: 1px 2px 3px 2px">Said: [[User:Rursus|<span style="color: blue">Rursus</span>]] [[User talk:Rursus|<span style="color: #800000">☻</span>]]</span>'' 09:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

:I agree. The article is not very clear on many key concepts, and needs some attention. I have added a new section on Architecture and Terminology near the beginning which addresses this issue--I hope that it is not too much detail.[[User:BabelStone|BabelStone]] ([[User talk:BabelStone|talk]]) 22:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

::: Thanks. I think that's a big improvement. I've long felt this artilce presented a largely skewed view of Uniocde: focussing too much on the Unicode transformation formats and other peripheral issues and not enough on the central topic of the assignement of characters to code point, collation and other algorithms, etc. Your new section goes a long way toward imporving that. [[User:Indexheavy|Indexheavy]] ([[User talk:Indexheavy|talk]]) 23:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

== Image of the book restored ==

I undid an edit with the edit message ''remove fair use image from unicode. That is an image of a *book* which while its about unicode, does not partain to the article and adds nothing to the article.''. This book isn't '''about''' unicode, this book '''is''' Unicode; the formal definition of "the Unicode Standard version 5.0" is "what's published in this book". --[[User:Alvestrand|Alvestrand]] ([[User talk:Alvestrand|talk]]) 05:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
:Ah drat, did not see this comment, see mine below ;). —— '''[[user:nixeagle|<font color="navy">nix</font>]][[User talk:Nixeagle|<font color="red">eagle]]'''</font> 20:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

== fair use image ==

Noted a few things in my comment on removal of the image. That image fails to provide a fair use rational as required by our non free image policy. As part of that it need to be spoken about in the article, not used as a pretty picture. If the book is actually spoken about that at least gives a case to leaving the image in. This is unicode: http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.1.0/. The book is actually out of date by a version. Do we still wish to include non-free content? Better images to include would be examples of what unicode looks like. Those can be free. —— '''[[user:nixeagle|<font color="navy">nix</font>]][[User talk:Nixeagle|<font color="red">eagle]]'''</font> 20:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

:The book is spoken about in the article as it IS the latest published version of the Unicode Standard. It is not out of data by a version as the book is only published when there is a major update to the standard (i.e. version 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0). Unicode 5.1 is a minor update, and so there is no new book associated with it. If you go to http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.1.0/ you will see that the pdf files linked to on the left are those for version 5.0, i.e. the 5.0 book. Quoting from that page: "Version 5.1.0 of the Unicode Standard consists of the book publication (The Unicode Standard, Version 5.0), as amended by this specification, together with the 5.1.0 Unicode Standard Annexes and the 5.1.0 Unicode Character Database (UCD)." The image should be reinstated.[[User:BabelStone|BabelStone]] ([[User talk:BabelStone|talk]]) 21:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

::The lack of a non-free-use rationale was easily rectified; I'm not surprised that Everson didn't have the patience to figure out how to navigate the labyritnth of Wikipedia's required justifications. FWIW, the Unicode standard is NOT based on RFCs. RFCs are IETF publications, the Unicode standard is created by the Unicode consortium. --[[User:Alvestrand|Alvestrand]] ([[User talk:Alvestrand|talk]]) 13:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

== UCS vs UTF ==

What's the difference between the two? This should be mentioned, as I don't know and would like to know. :P --[[User:Snaxe920|Snaxe/fow]] ([[User talk:Snaxe920|talk]]) 19:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

: I agree the article could be clearer on this, but I've been unsure how to clear it up in a thorough way. The UCS is the Universal Character Set which the Unicode Consortium and the ISO cooperate to maintain and basically permanently assigns a character (semantic graphemes) to specific codepoint in a 32 bit range of codepoints. Unicode only supports fewer than 21 bits of those codepoints but that seems likely to handle the needs of computers for some time to come. There may be some agreement from ISO to not use the other bits, but I'm not sure. I think in terms of UCS-4 that is the ISO character encoding that addresses all 32bits of the range, the remaining codepoints not supported by Unicode are reserved for private use.

: From the UCS the Unicode consortium adds many other algorithms and property lists that support text processing on computer systems. These include the UTF (Unicode Transform Formats) that allow the more than one million code points supported by Unicode to be expressed in a stream of bytes (variable length for UTF-16, UTF-8, etc.; and fixed length for UTF-32 or what some have proposed a UTF-24). However, the UCS and the UTFs are only two of the building blocks of Unicode text processing. There are also collation algorithms, the bidirectional text algorithm, character folding algorithms (treating characters as equivalent for the purposes of searching and collating), glyph shaping algorithms, etc. Together with the UCS all of these algorithms and character properties comprise the Unicode standard. Hope that helps. [[User:Indexheavy|Indexheavy]] ([[User talk:Indexheavy|talk]]) 18:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

:The last sentence of the opening paragraph states "the now-obsolete UCS-2 (which uses 2 bytes for all characters, but does not include every character in the Unicode standard), and UTF-16 (which extends UCS-2, using 4 bytes to encode characters missing from UCS-2)." If you want more information you only have to look at the "Unicode" box at the right underneath the book picture, and click on the appropriate link, and that will explain the difference between e.g. UCS-2 and UTF-16. [[User:BabelStone|BabelStone]] ([[User talk:BabelStone|talk]]) 12:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


==Unicode and other Standards==

Since Unicode character encoding is now an important part of (and sometimes a requirement of) many other IT and communications standards including XHTML, and ISO/IEC 14651 etc. I think it might be very useful to have a section detailing this. Does anyone have a comprehensive list of other standards and protocols using Unicode ~ ISO/IEC 10646? [[User:CFynn|Chris Fynn]] ([[User talk:CFynn|talk]]) 19:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

: I don't have a list but I put a link relevant to HTML on the [[Unicode equivalence]] page because one of the notions of equivalence impinges on layout matters. There's a document for XML as well, google can find it. [[User:VasileGaburici|VasileGaburici]] ([[User talk:VasileGaburici|talk]]) 00:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

: Chris, it would be a huge job to build, and then keep up to date, a list of standards that reference ISO/IEC 10646 or Unicode; but searching the [http://www.iso.org/iso/store.htm ISO store] I find that the following 118 current standards mention "ISO/IEC 10646" in their text, although you would have to go through them all individually to check whether they formally reference 10646 or not. There are of course many other non-ISO standards that reference 10646 or Unicode, for example a lot of defence and aeronautical standards reference 10646 as the source for the "Basic Character Set" (BCS) that they use ... a subset of the 10646 character set comprising the first 128 characters only. [[User:BabelStone|BabelStone]] ([[User talk:BabelStone|talk]]) 12:05, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

* IEC 81714-2:2006 = Design of graphical symbols for use in the technical documentation of products -- Part 2: Specification for graphical symbols in a computer sensible form, including graphical symbols for a reference library, and requirements for their interchange
* ISO 843:1997 = Information and documentation -- Conversion of Greek characters into Latin characters
* ISO 1951:2007 = Presentation/representation of entries in dictionaries -- Requirements, recommendations and information
* ISO 2709:2008 = Information and documentation -- Format for information exchange
* ISO 3166-1:2006 = Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions -- Part 1: Country codes
* ISO 3166-2:2007 = Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions -- Part 2: Country subdivision code
* ISO 8459-5:2002 = Information and documentation -- Bibliographic data element directory -- Part 5: Data elements for the exchange of cataloguing and metadata
* ISO 10303-11:2004 = Industrial automation systems and integration -- Product data representation and exchange -- Part 11: Description methods: The EXPRESS language reference manual
* ISO 12006-3:2007 = Building construction -- Organization of information about construction works -- Part 3: Framework for object-oriented information
* ISO 13374-2:2007 = Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines -- Data processing, communication and presentation -- Part 2: Data processing
* ISO 13399-1:2006 = Cutting tool data representation and exchange -- Part 1: Overview, fundamental principles and general information model
* ISO 13584-26:2000/Amd 1:2007 =
* ISO 15706-2:2007 = Information and documentation -- International Standard Audiovisual Number (ISAN) -- Part 2: Version identifier
* ISO 15740:2008 = Photography -- Electronic still picture imaging -- Picture transfer protocol (PTP) for digital still photography devices
* ISO 15745-1:2003 = Industrial automation systems and integration -- Open systems application integration framework -- Part 1: Generic reference description
* ISO 15745-1:2003/Amd 1:2007 =
* ISO 15745-3:2003 = Industrial automation systems and integration -- Open systems application integration framework -- Part 3: Reference description for IEC 61158-based control systems
* ISO 15924:2004 = Information and documentation -- Codes for the representation of names of scripts
* ISO 15930-7:2008 = Graphic technology -- Prepress digital data exchange using PDF -- Part 7: Complete exchange of printing data (PDF/X-4) and partial exchange of printing data with external profile reference (PDF/X-4p) using PDF 1.6
* ISO 16484-5:2007 = Building automation and control systems -- Part 5: Data communication protocol
* ISO 19118:2005 = Geographic information -- Encoding
* ISO 21549-5:2008 = Health informatics -- Patient healthcard data -- Part 5: Identification data
* ISO 21549-6:2008 = Health informatics -- Patient healthcard data -- Part 6: Administrative data
* ISO 24517-1:2008 = Document management -- Engineering document format using PDF -- Part 1: Use of PDF 1.6 (PDF/E-1)
* ISO 81714-1:1999 = Design of graphical symbols for use in the technical documentation of products -- Part 1: Basic rules
* ISO/IEC 1539-1:2004 = Information technology -- Programming languages -- Fortran -- Part 1: Base language
* ISO/IEC 2022:1994 = Information technology -- Character code structure and extension techniques
* ISO/IEC 2375:2003 = Information technology -- Procedure for registration of escape sequences and coded character sets
* ISO/IEC 5218:2004 = Information technology -- Codes for the representation of human sexes
* ISO/IEC 6429:1992 = Information technology -- Control functions for coded character sets
* ISO/IEC 6937:2001 = Information technology -- Coded graphic character set for text communication -- Latin alphabet
* ISO/IEC 8211:1994 = Information technology -- Specification for a data descriptive file for information interchange
* ISO/IEC 8652:1995/Amd 1:2007 =
* ISO/IEC 8859-1:1998 = Information technology -- 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets -- Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1
* ISO/IEC 8859-4:1998 = Information technology -- 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets -- Part 4: Latin alphabet No. 4
* ISO/IEC 8859-10:1998 = Information technology -- 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets -- Part 10: Latin alphabet No. 6
* ISO/IEC 9579:2000 = Information technology -- Remote database access for SQL with security enhancement
* ISO/IEC 9594-5:2005 = Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection -- The Directory: Protocol specifications
* ISO/IEC 9594-6:2005 = Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection -- The Directory: Selected attribute types
* ISO/IEC 9646-3:1998 = Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection -- Conformance testing methodology and framework -- Part 3: The Tree and Tabular Combined Notation (TTCN)
* ISO/IEC 9834-8:2005 = Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection -- Procedures for the operation of OSI Registration Authorities: Generation and registration of Universally Unique Identifiers (UUIDs) and their use as ASN.1 Object Identifier components
* ISO/IEC 9899:1999 = Programming languages -- C
* ISO/IEC 9899:1999/Cor 2:2004 =
* ISO/IEC 9995-2:2002 = Information technology -- Keyboard layouts for text and office systems -- Part 2: Alphanumeric section
* ISO/IEC 10175-2:1996 = Information technology -- Text and office systems -- Document Printing Application (DPA) -- Part 2: Protocol specification
* ISO/IEC 10918-3:1997 = Information technology -- Digital compression and coding of continuous-tone still images: Extensions
* ISO/IEC 11160-1:1996 = Information technology -- Office equipment -- Minimum information to be included in specification sheets -- Printers -- Part 1: Class 1 and Class 2 printers
* ISO/IEC 11179-1:2004 = Information technology -- Metadata registries (MDR) -- Part 1: Framework
* ISO/IEC 11404:2007 = Information technology -- General-Purpose Datatypes (GPD)
* ISO/IEC 12087-5:1998 = Information technology -- Computer graphics and image processing -- Image Processing and Interchange (IPI) -- Functional specification -- Part 5: Basic Image Interchange Format (BIIF)
* ISO/IEC 12087-5:1998/Cor 1:2001 =
* ISO/IEC 13238-3:1998 = Information technology -- Data Management -- Part 3: IRDS export/import facility
* ISO/IEC 13346-1:1995 = Information technology -- Volume and file structure of write-once and rewritable media using non-sequential recording for information interchange -- Part 1: General
* ISO/IEC 13490-1:1995 = Information technology -- Volume and file structure of read-only and write-once compact disk media for information interchange -- Part 1: General
* ISO/IEC 13522-6:1998 = Information technology -- Coding of multimedia and hypermedia information -- Part 6: Support for enhanced interactive applications
* ISO/IEC 13568:2002 = Information technology -- Z formal specification notation -- Syntax, type system and semantics
* ISO/IEC 13886:1996 = Information technology -- Language-Independent Procedure Calling (LIPC)
* ISO/IEC 14496-22:2007 = Information technology -- Coding of audio-visual objects -- Part 22: Open Font Format
* ISO/IEC 14496-4:2004 = Information technology -- Coding of audio-visual objects -- Part 4: Conformance testing
* ISO/IEC 14568:1997 = Information technology -- DXL: Diagram eXchange Language for tree-structured charts
* ISO/IEC 14651:2007 = Information technology -- International string ordering and comparison -- Method for comparing character strings and description of the common template tailorable ordering
* ISO/IEC 14755:1997 = Information technology -- Input methods to enter characters from the repertoire of ISO/IEC 10646 with a keyboard or other input device
* ISO/IEC 14772-1:1997 = Information technology -- Computer graphics and image processing -- The Virtual Reality Modeling Language -- Part 1: Functional specification and UTF-8 encoding
* ISO/IEC 14863:1996 = Information technology -- System-Independent Data Format (SIDF)
* ISO/IEC 14882:2003 = Programming languages -- C++
* ISO/IEC 15417:2007 = Information technology -- Automatic identification and data capture techniques -- Code 128 bar code symbology specification
* ISO/IEC 15897:1999 = Information technology -- Procedures for registration of cultural elements
* ISO/IEC 15938-5:2003 = Information technology -- Multimedia content description interface -- Part 5: Multimedia description schemes
* ISO/IEC 15961:2004 = Information technology -- Radio frequency identification (RFID) for item management -- Data protocol: application interface
* ISO/IEC 15962:2004 = Information technology -- Radio frequency identification (RFID) for item management -- Data protocol: data encoding rules and logical memory functions
* ISO/IEC 17592:2004 = Information technology -- 120 mm (4,7 Gbytes per side) and 80 mm (1,46 Gbytes per side) DVD rewritable disk (DVD-RAM)
* ISO/IEC 19503:2005 = Information technology -- XML Metadata Interchange (XMI)
* ISO/IEC 19778-1:2008 = Information technology -- Learning, education and training -- Collaborative technology -- Collaborative workplace -- Part 1: Collaborative workplace data model
* ISO/IEC 19778-2:2008 = Information technology -- Learning, education and training -- Collaborative technology -- Collaborative workplace -- Part 2: Collaborative environment data model
* ISO/IEC 19778-3:2008 = Information technology -- Learning, education and training -- Collaborative technology -- Collaborative workplace -- Part 3: Collaborative group data model
* ISO/IEC 19780-1:2008 = Information technology -- Learning, education and training -- Collaborative technology -- Collaborative learning communication -- Part 1: Text-based communication
* ISO/IEC 19784-1:2006 = Information technology -- Biometric application programming interface -- Part 1: BioAPI specification
* ISO/IEC 19784-1:2006/Amd 1:2007 = BioGUI specification
* ISO/IEC 19785-1:2006 = Information technology -- Common Biometric Exchange Formats Framework -- Part 1: Data element specification
* ISO/IEC 19785-3:2007 = Information technology -- Common Biometric Exchange Formats Framework -- Part 3: Patron format specifications
* ISO/IEC 21000-17:2006 = Information technology -- Multimedia framework (MPEG-21) -- Part 17: Fragment Identification of MPEG Resources
* ISO/IEC 22537:2006 = Information technology -- ECMAScript for XML (E4X) specification
* ISO/IEC 23001-1:2006 = Information technology -- MPEG systems technologies -- Part 1: Binary MPEG format for XML
* ISO/IEC 23270:2006 = Information technology -- Programming languages -- C#
* ISO/IEC 23271:2006 = Information technology -- Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) Partitions I to VI
* ISO/IEC 23651:2003 = Information technology -- 8 mm wide magnetic tape cartridge for information interchange -- Helical scan recording -- AIT-3 format
* ISO/IEC 24707:2007 = Information technology -- Common Logic (CL): a framework for a family of logic-based languages
* ISO/IEC 24709-1:2007 = Information technology -- Conformance testing for the biometric application programming interface (BioAPI) -- Part 1: Methods and procedures
* ISO/IEC 24738:2006 = Information technology -- Icon symbols and functions for multimedia link attributes
* ISO/IEC 24752-1:2008 = Information technology -- User interfaces -- Universal remote console -- Part 1: Framework
* ISO/IEC 24752-2:2008 = Information technology -- User interfaces -- Universal remote console -- Part 2: User interface socket description
* ISO/IEC 24752-3:2008 = Information technology -- User interfaces -- Universal remote console -- Part 3: Presentation template
* ISO/IEC 24752-5:2008 = Information technology -- User interfaces -- Universal remote console -- Part 5: Resource description
* ISO/IEC 24754:2008 = Information technology -- Document description and processing languages -- Minimum requirements for specifying document rendering systems
* ISO/IEC 24824-1:2007 = Information technology -- Generic applications of ASN.1: Fast infoset
* ISO/IEC 24824-3:2008 = Information technology -- Generic applications of ASN.1: Fast infoset security
* ISO/IEC 26907:2007 = Information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange between systems -- High Rate Ultra Wideband PHY and MAC Standard
* ISO/IEC ISP 10611-1:2003 = Information technology -- International Standardized Profiles AMH1n -- Message Handling Systems -- Common Messaging -- Part 1: MHS Service Support
* ISO/IEC ISP 11186-1:1996 = Information technology -- International Standardized Profiles FVT3nn -- Virtual Terminal Basic Class -- Register of attribute assignment type definitions -- Part 1: FVT321 -- Font Assignment Type No. 1
* ISO/IEC ISP 11186-2:1996 = Information technology -- International Standardized Profiles FVT3nn -- Virtual Terminal Basic Class -- Register of attribute assignment type definitions -- Part 2: FVT311 -- Repertoire Assignment Type for ISO/IEC 10646
* ISO/IEC ISP 11186-3:2000 = Information technology -- International Standardized Profiles FVT3nn -- Virtual Terminal Basic Class -- Register of attribute assignment type definitions -- Part 3: FVT312 -- Repertoire Assignment Type for ISO/IEC 2022 Level 2
* ISO/IEC TR 10000-2:1998 = Information technology -- Framework and taxonomy of International Standardized Profiles -- Part 2: Principles and Taxonomy for OSI Profiles
* ISO/IEC TR 10176:2003 = Information technology -- Guidelines for the preparation of programming language standards
* ISO/IEC TR 11017:1998 = Information technology -- Framework for internationalization
* ISO/IEC TR 15285:1998 = Information technology -- An operational model for characters and glyphs
* ISO/IEC TR 15440:2005 = Information technology -- Future keyboards and other associated input devices and related entry methods
* ISO/IEC TR 19764:2005 = Information technology -- Guidelines, methodology and reference criteria for cultural and linguistic adaptability in information technology products
* ISO/IEC TR 19766:2007 = Information technology -- Guidelines for the design of icons and symbols accessible to all users, including the elderly and persons with disabilities
* ISO/IEC TR 19769:2004 = Information technology -- Programming languages, their environments and system software inferfaces -- Extensions for the programming language C to support new character data types
* ISO/IEC TR 24731-1:2007 = Information technology -- Programming languages, their environments and system software interfaces -- Extensions to the C library -- Part 1: Bounds-checking interfaces
* ISO/IEEE 11073-10201:2004 = Health informatics -- Point-of-care medical device communication -- Part 10201: Domain information model
* ISO/TR 10303-12:1997 = Industrial automation systems and integration -- Product data representation and exchange -- Part 12: Description methods: The EXPRESS-I language reference manual
* ISO/TS 11073-92001:2007 = Health informatics -- Medical waveform format -- Part 92001: Encoding rules
* ISO/TS 18234-2:2006 = Traffic and Travel Information (TTI) -- TTI via Transport Protocol Expert Group (TPEG) data-streams -- Part 2: Syntax, Semantics and Framing Structure (SSF)
* ISO/TS 19103:2005 = Geographic information -- Conceptual schema language
* ISO/TS 19139:2007 = Geographic information -- Metadata -- XML schema implementation
* ISO/TS 24534-4:2008 = Automatic vehicle and equipment identification -- Electronic Registration Identification (ERI) for vehicles -- Part 4: Secure communications using asymmetrical techniques
* ISO/TS 24534-5:2008 = Automatic vehicle and equipment identification -- Electronic Registration Identification (ERI) for vehicles -- Part 5: Secure communications using symmetrical techniques

==Unicode and Typography==
Since Unicode encodes characters '''not''' glyphs (letter forms) I'm wodering if this article actually properly belongs in the Typography category? Strictly speaking Typography (unlike Unicode) is mainly to do with glyphs not characters. [[User:CFynn|Chris Fynn]] ([[User talk:CFynn|talk]]) 19:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

: It's a fine point to decide whether character encoding is close enough to typography to include the category. The latter integrally depends on the former, because, at the risk of oversimplifying the issue, choosing glyphs is also choosing characters. Because the advent of Unicode specifically has had a direct and sweeping impact on the practice of typography, I would suggest to leave it.&nbsp;''—[[User:Mzajac |Michael]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Mzajac |Z.]]&nbsp;<small>2008-09-07&nbsp;19:45&nbsp;z</small>''

:: Unicode really encodes glyphs that "different enough" from each other or have different enough meanings (see the math alphabets above BMP for as example of the latter). [[OpenType]] fonts are addressed using Unicode code points etc., so Unicode is intimately related to typography anyway. Also Unicode itself contains some typographic features, like some standard ligatures, subscripts and superscripts etc. Parenthetically, new ligatures won't be added to Unicode since the decision to include them in Unicode was seen as "cheap" way to get superior typography in days when other solutions didn't exist. [[User:VasileGaburici|VasileGaburici]] ([[User talk:VasileGaburici|talk]]) 00:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

:::: I would also add that Unicode encodes graphemes which are basically assigning all of the potential glyphs that share an identical semantic / meaning to the same character. To provide contrast, Unicode could encode characters that are not graphemes (semantic phonemes or semantic concepts such as the mathematical constant π, for example), but it does not do that: instead focussing only on graphemes (compatibility characters aside). So even if we exclude all of the compatibility characters from Unicode (which are included even though they don't normally meet the cut), Unicode is still very much a part of typography since it is encoding graphemes.

:::: Unicode also provides information on diacritic and combining mark placement. Though none of the Unicode implementations I am aware of make use of this information (relying instead on the font to do this work), the data is available from Unicode alone (without also requiring font support for combining marks). [[User:Indexheavy|Indexheavy]] ([[User talk:Indexheavy|talk]]) 14:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

== misuse of the term Unicode ==

I added a very helpful comment recently along the lines of "the term unicode is frequently and
incorrectly used to refer to UCS-2" and some smart removed it. My comment is a good one and deserves to remain on the page. Perhaps some people should learn from the experience of people who actually have to program computers and know a lot about how the term 'unicode' is used. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.44.43.10|212.44.43.10]] ([[User talk:212.44.43.10|talk]]) 10:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I removed the statement because it was an unsupported, subjective comment. In order to be accepted a statement such as this would need to cite an authoritative source. I am a programmer, and I think that I do know a lot about how the term 'unicode' is used, and I for one do not think that the statement that people commonly confuse Unicode with UCS-2 is correct. UCS-2 is an obsolete encoding form for Unicode, and if somebody does not know what Unicode really means they are hardly likely to know what UCS-2 is (or be able to distinguish between UCS-2 and UTF-16, which is what your comment implies). From my experience with ignorant fellow-programmers, I think that perhaps you mean that some programmers think that Unicode is more or less just 16-bit wide ASCII. [[User:BabelStone|BabelStone]] ([[User talk:BabelStone|talk]]) 09:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

== Can't permanently switch it. ==

I need help here. I right click to change the Encoding to Western European(windows), and every time I go to a different page, it changes back to Unicode(UTF-8). See the reason why I want to change it is because it doesn't let me click on images, only text links, while the other lets me do both. I just started having this problem today, so could someone please help me, as this is annoying having to switch it each time I go to a different page.[[Special:Contributions/205.160.208.102|205.160.208.102]] ([[User talk:205.160.208.102|talk]]) 08:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:48, 12 October 2008

Iron Bowl
First meetingFebruary 22, 1893
38–22, AUB
Latest meetingNovember 24, 2007
17–10, AUB
Next meetingNovember 29, 2008
AUB at ALA
Statistics
Meetings total72
All-time series38–33–1, ALA
Largest victoryDecember 4, 1948
55–0, ALA

The Iron Bowl is the name given to the annual intercollegiate football game between the teams of University of Alabama. and the Auburn University. The deep-seated football rivalry between Alabama and Auburn has historically spilled over into the politics and society of the state of Alabama. As is typical of such games, it is usually scheduled to be the final regular-season game for each team and is always played in late November. In a survey done by Sports Illustrated it ranked #2 after Boston Red Sox-New York Yankees as the greatest rivalry.[citation needed] ESPNU ranked the rivalry #1 in their Top Ten College Football Rivalries.[1] Alabama leads the series 38–33–1. The longest streak of the series was a nine game winning streak by Alabama from 1973–1981.

The games are played at Bryant-Denny Stadium in Tuscaloosa every even-numbered year and at Jordan-Hare Stadium in Auburn every odd-numbered year. For much of the twentieth century the game was played every year in Birmingham. In 2007, the Iron Bowl was pushed back a week, to Thanksgiving weekend. It will remain that weekend in 2008.

History

Alabama and Auburn played their first football game in Lakeview Park in Birmingham, Alabama on February 22, 1893. Auburn won 32–22, before an estimated crowd of 2,000. As if a signal of the future, disagreement between the schools began immediately as Alabama considered the game to be the final matchup of the 1892 season and Auburn recorded it as the first of 1893. The series was suspended after the 1907 game when the schools could not come to agreement over the amount of expenses to be paid players, as well as from where officials for the game should be obtained.

In 1947 the Alabama House of Representatives passed a resolution encouraging the schools to "make possible the inauguration of a full athletic program between the two schools".[2]. Auburn president Dr. Ralph B. Draughon and Alabama president Dr. John Gallalee decided during the winter and spring of 1948 to end the disagreement and renew the series. The games would be played in Birmingham because it had the largest stadium in the state, 44,000-seat Legion Field, and the tickets would be split evenly between the two schools. Alabama won the first game when the series renewed 55-0, the most lopsided victory of the series.

By 1980 the series had come to be called the Iron Bowl, due to Birmingham’s prominence as a center of iron and steel production. Throughout the 1980s, Auburn made additions to Jordan-Hare Stadium, and in 1987, it eclipsed Legion Field in size. Auburn desired to make the Iron Bowl a “home-and-home” series, and the schools reached an agreement where Auburn could play their home games for the Iron Bowl in Auburn starting in 1989 (except for the 1991 game, which was played at Legion Field), and Alabama would have a "home" ticket allocation for games in Legion Field. On December 2, 1989, Alabama came to Auburn's Jordan-Hare Stadium for the first time in the history of the rivalry. A sellout crowd would witness Auburn win its first true "home" game of the series, 30–20 over an Alabama team that entered the game unbeaten and ranked #2 in the country.

Alabama continued to hold their home game at Legion Field. In 1998, Alabama expanded Bryant-Denny Stadium to a capacity of 83,818, exceeding Legion Field by a few hundred. Alabama moved their home games in the series to Bryant-Denny Stadium in 2000, only the third time the Iron Bowl was played in Tuscaloosa, and the first time since 1901. A new attendance record for the Iron Bowl was set in 2006 as the latest expansion to Bryant-Denny Stadium increased its capacity to 92,138.

Foy-ODK Sportsmanship Award

The trophy given to the winner of the game is the Foy-ODK Sportsmanship Award. It is named after James E. Foy, an Alabama graduate and former Auburn dean of students and Omicron Delta Kappa Honor Society – which was established on both campuses during the 1920s. The Foy Trophy is presented at halftime of the Auburn–Alabama basketball game later in the same academic year at the winner's coliseum. After the trophy presentation, the SGA President of the losing school must recite his or her adversary's fight song.

Famous moments

With a rivalry of this stature, there are a number of games and moments that define the rivalry.

1964 – National Television

The Iron Bowl was first broadcasted nationally on November 26, 1964. Joe Namath led Alabama to a 21–14 victory over Auburn, and Alabama would go on to win its 7th national championship.

1967 – The Run in the mud

On a stormy night in 1967, Alabama quarterback Kenny Stabler ran for a 53 yard touchdown to give Bama a 7–3 win.

1972 – Punt Bama Punt

Trailing 16–3 with 6 minutes left, Auburn blocked and scored on two Alabama punts to win the game 17–16.

1981 – 315

Alabama Coach Paul "Bear" Bryant got his 315th career victory to pass Amos Alonzo Stagg to become the all-time winningest Division I-A coach in a 28–17 win over Auburn.

1982 – Bo Over the Top

Auburn drove the field and scored with 2 minutes left when Bo Jackson jumped over the top of the pile on the one yard line. Auburn won the game 23–22.

1985 – Van Tiffin's Kick

Trailing 23-22 with only 57 seconds remaining, Alabama quarterback Mike Shula and the Tide offense drove 65 yards in the final 57 seconds, to set up a 53-yard field goal by Van Tiffin, winning the game 25–23 as time expired.

1989 – First Time Ever

In the first game ever played in Auburn, the Tigers beat #2 Alabama 30–20.

1994 – Battle of The South's Unbeatens

10-0 Alabama (#3 AP) defeated 9–0–1 Auburn (#6 AP) 21–14 in a matchup of undefeated teams, snapping Auburn's 21-game unbeaten streak.

1999 – Saturday Morning Virgin

Alabama gets their first win ever at Auburn, 28–17.

Game results

Iron Bowl
Alabama (38) Auburn (33)
1894 1903
1905 1906
1948 1950
1951 1952
1953 1959
1960 1961
1962 1964
1965 1966
1967 1968
1971 1973
1974 1975
1976 1977
1978 1979
1980 1981
1984 1985
1990 1991
1992 1994
1996 1998
1999 2001 		1893 (Feb. & Nov.)
1895 1900
1901 1902
1904 1949
1954 1955
1956 1957
1958 1963
1969 1970
1972 1982
1983 1986
1987 1988
1989 1993
1995 1997
2000 2002
2003 2004
2005 2006
2007
Ties (1)
1907

Since 1893, The Crimson Tide and Tigers have played 72 times. Alabama leads the all-time series, with 38 wins to Auburn's 33, with one tie.[3] The game has been played in four cities: Auburn, Birmingham, Montgomery, and Tuscaloosa. Alabama leads the series in Birmingham (34-18-1). Auburn leads the series in Tuscaloosa (6-0-0) and Auburn (7-2-0). The series is tied in Montgomery (2-2-0).

Alabama victories are shaded ██ light red. Auburn victories shaded in ██ light blue.

No. Date Site Winning team Losing team Series
1 1893-02-22 Birmingham Auburn 32 Alabama     22 AUB 1-0
2 1893-11-30  Montgomery  Auburn 40 Alabama 16 AUB 2-0
3 1894-11-29 Montgomery Alabama 18 Auburn 0 AUB 2-1
4 1895-11-23 Tuscaloosa Auburn 48 Alabama 0 AUB 3-1
5 1900-11-17 Montgomery Auburn 53 Alabama 5 AUB 4-1
6 1901-11-15 Tuscaloosa Auburn 17 Alabama 0 AUB 5-1
7 1902-10-18 Birmingham Auburn 23 Alabama 0 AUB 6-1
8 1903-10-23 Montgomery Alabama 18 Auburn 6 AUB 6-2
9 1904-11-12 Birmingham Auburn 29 Alabama 5 AUB 7-2
10 1905-11-18 Birmingham Alabama 30 Auburn 0 AUB 7-3
11 1906-11-17 Birmingham Alabama 10 Auburn 0 AUB 7-4
12 1907-11-16 Birmingham Auburn 6 Alabama 6 AUB 7-4-1
13 1948-12-04 Birmingham Alabama 55 Auburn 0 AUB 7-5-1
14 1949-12-03 Birmingham Auburn 14 Alabama 13 AUB 8-5-1
15 1950-12-02 Birmingham Alabama 34 Auburn 0 AUB 8-6-1
16 1951-12-02 Birmingham Alabama 25 Auburn 7 AUB 8-7-1
17 1952-11-29 Birmingham Alabama 21 Auburn 0 Tied 8-8-1
18 1953-11-28 Birmingham Alabama 10 Auburn 7 BAMA 9-8-1
19 1954-11-27 Birmingham Auburn 28 Alabama 0 Tied 9-9-1
20 1955-11-26 Birmingham Auburn 26 Alabama 0 AUB 10-9-1
21 1956-12-01 Birmingham Auburn 34 Alabama 7 AUB 11-9-1
22 1957-11-30 Birmingham Auburn 40 Alabama 0 AUB 12-9-1
23 1958-11-29 Birmingham Auburn 14 Alabama 8 AUB 13-9-1
24 1959-11-28 Birmingham Alabama 10 Auburn 0 AUB 13-10-1
25 1960-11-26 Birmingham Alabama 3 Auburn 0 AUB 13-11-1
26 1961-12-02 Birmingham Alabama 34 Auburn 0 AUB 13-12-1
27 1962-12-01 Birmingham Alabama 38 Auburn 0 Tied 13-13-1
28 1963-11-30 Birmingham Auburn 10 Alabama 8 AUB 14-13-1
29 1964-11-26 Birmingham Alabama 21 Auburn 14 Tied 14-14-1
30 1965-11-27 Birmingham Alabama 30 Auburn 3 BAMA 15-14-1
31 1966-12-03 Birmingham Alabama 31 Auburn 0 BAMA 16-14-1
32 1967-12-02 Birmingham Alabama 7 Auburn 3 BAMA 17-14-1
33 1968-11-30 Birmingham Alabama 24 Auburn 16 BAMA 18-14-1
34 1969-11-29 Birmingham Auburn 49 Alabama 26 BAMA 18-15-1
35 1970-11-28 Birmingham Auburn 33 Alabama 28 BAMA 18-16-1
36 1971-11-27 Birmingham Alabama 31 Auburn 7 BAMA 19-16-1
37 1972-12-02 Birmingham Auburn 17 Alabama 16 BAMA 19-17-1
38 1973-12-01 Birmingham Alabama 35 Auburn 0 BAMA 20-17-1
39 1974-11-29 Birmingham Alabama 17 Auburn 13 BAMA 21-17-1
40 1975-11-27 Birmingham Alabama 28 Auburn 0 BAMA 22-17-1
41 1976-11-27 Birmingham Alabama 38 Auburn 7 BAMA 23-17-1
42 1977-11-26 Birmingham Alabama 48 Auburn 21 BAMA 24-17-1
43 1978-12-02 Birmingham Alabama 34 Auburn 16 BAMA 25-17-1
44 1979-12-01 Birmingham Alabama 25 Auburn 18 BAMA 26-17-1
45 1980-11-29 Birmingham Alabama 34 Auburn 18 BAMA 27-17-1
46 1981-11-28 Birmingham Alabama 28 Auburn 17 BAMA 28-17-1
47 1982-11-27 Birmingham Auburn 23 Alabama 22 BAMA 28-18-1
48 1983-12-03 Birmingham Auburn 23 Alabama 20 BAMA 28-19-1
49 1984-12-01 Birmingham Alabama 17 Auburn 15 BAMA 29-19-1
50 1985-11-30 Birmingham Alabama 25 Auburn 23 BAMA 30-19-1
51 1986-11-29 Birmingham Auburn 21 Alabama 17 BAMA 30-20-1
52 1987-11-27 Birmingham Auburn 10 Alabama 0 BAMA 30-21-1
53 1988-11-25 Birmingham Auburn 15 Alabama 10 BAMA 30-22-1
54 1989-12-02 Auburn Auburn 30 Alabama 20 BAMA 30-23-1
55 1990-12-01 Birmingham Alabama 16 Auburn 7 BAMA 31-23-1
56 1991-11-30 Birmingham Alabama 13 Auburn 6 BAMA 32-23-1
57 1992-11-26 Birmingham Alabama 17 Auburn 0 BAMA 33-23-1
58 1993-11-20 Auburn Auburn 22 Alabama 14 BAMA 33-24-1
59 1994-11-19 Birmingham Alabama 21 Auburn 14 BAMA 34-24-1
60 1995-11-18 Auburn Auburn 31 Alabama 27 BAMA 34-25-1
61 1996-11-23 Birmingham Alabama 24 Auburn 23 BAMA 35-25-1
62 1997-11-22 Auburn Auburn 18 Alabama 17 BAMA 35-26-1
63 1998-11-21 Birmingham Alabama 31 Auburn 17 BAMA 36-26-1
64 1999-11-20 Auburn Alabama 28 Auburn 17 BAMA 37-26-1
65 2000-11-18 Tuscaloosa Auburn 9 Alabama 0 BAMA 37-27-1
66 2001-11-17 Auburn Alabama 31 Auburn 7 BAMA 38-27-1
67 2002-11-23 Tuscaloosa Auburn 17 Alabama 7 BAMA 38-28-1
68 2003-11-22 Auburn Auburn 28 Alabama 23 BAMA 38-29-1
69 2004-11-20 Tuscaloosa Auburn 21 Alabama 13 BAMA 38-30-1
70 2005-11-19 Auburn Auburn 28 Alabama 18 BAMA 38-31-1
71 2006-11-18 Tuscaloosa Auburn 22 Alabama 15 BAMA 38-32-1
72 2007-11-24 Auburn Auburn 17 Alabama 10 BAMA 38-33-1
73 2008-11-29[4] Tuscaloosa Auburn at Alabama
74 2009-11-28[4] Auburn Alabama at Auburn

See also

References

  1. ^ "ESPNU's Top Ten College Football Rivalries". College News. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
  2. ^ "The Auburn-Alabama Rivalry, "The Iron Bowl"". Rocky Mountain Auburn Club. 2006. Retrieved 2006-12-04.
  3. ^ "Alabama vs. Auburn series history". College Football Data Warehouse. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
  4. ^ a b "Auburn Football Future Schedules". NationalChamps.net. Retrieved 2007-11-27.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Unicode&oldid=244751806"