February 28 incident
The 228 Incident (Chinese: 二二八事件; pinyin: èr èr bā shìjiàn; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: Jī-jī-pat sū-kiāⁿ) also known as the 228 Massacre (simplified Chinese: 二二八大屠杀; traditional Chinese: 二二八大屠殺; pinyin: èr èr bā dàtúshā) was an anti-government uprising in Taiwan that began on February 28, 1947 that was violently suppressed by the Kuomintang (KMT) government resulting in many civilian deaths. The Incident marked the beginning of the White Terror period in Taiwan in which thousands more Taiwanese vanished, were killed, or imprisoned. The number "228" refers to the day the massacre began, February 28 (2nd month, 28th day ).
Taiwan, after 50 years of rule by Japan, had been placed under the administrative control of the Republic of China (ROC) in 1945 by the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA). Two years of administration by the Kuomintang led to the widespread impression among Taiwanese that it was plagued by nepotism, corruption, and economic failure. Tensions increased between Taiwanese and the ROC administration. The flashpoint came on February 27, 1947 in Taipei when a dispute between a female cigarette vendor and an anti-smuggling officer triggered civil disorder and open rebellion that would last for days. The uprising was violently put down by the military of the Republic of China.
Taiwan's KMT government forbade all discussion of the event for fifty years. No mention of the 2-28 Incident appeared in textbooks. Families dared not even speak the names of relatives who were killed or who disappeared.
On the anniversary of the event in 1995 President Lee Teng-hui opened the subject for the first time. The subject is now openly commemorated and discussed. Details of the event remain the subject of investigation. This event is now commemorated in Taiwan as Peace Memorial Day (simplified Chinese: 和平纪念日; traditional Chinese: 和平紀念日; pinyin: hépíng jìniànrì). Monuments and memorial parks to the victims of 2-28 have been erected in a number of Taiwan's cities, including Kaohsiung and Taipei. Taiwan's president gathers with other officials every February 28 to ring a commemorative bell in memory of the victims. The president bows to family members of 2-28 victims and gives each one a certificate officially declaring the family innocent of any crime.
Background
As settlement for losing the First Sino-Japanese War (1894–1895), China relinquished in perpetuity its claims to Taiwan and the Pescadores to Japan in 1895. Armed resistance against the Japanese colonizers had been largely put down by the 1920s. Subsequently, Taiwanese perceptions of the Japanese occupation during the colonial era are significantly more favorable than perceptions in other parts of East Asia, partly because during its 50 years (1895–1945) of colonial rule Japan developed Taiwan's economy and raised the standard of living for most Taiwanese citizens, building up Taiwan as a supply base for the Japanese main islands. Later the Japanese also forced Taiwanese people to adopt Japanese names and practice Shinto, while the schools instilled a sense of "Japanese spirit" in students. By the time of World War II began, many Taiwanese locals were proficient in the Japanese language, while keeping their localized identity.
Following the end of World War II, Taiwan was placed under the administrative control of the Republic of China. Chen Yi, the Governor-General of Taiwan, arrived on October 24, 1945 and received the last Japanese governor, Ando Rikichi, who signed the document of surrender on the next day and proclaimed the day as retrocession day. This turned out to be legally controversial since Japan did not renounce its sovereignty over Taiwan until 1952, which further complicated the political status of Taiwan. This was further complicated by the official surrender document, Treaty of San Francisco, where Japan renounced their sovereignty over Taiwan. The treaty does not formally state which nations are sovereign over Taiwan, an issue that some supporters of Taiwan independence use to justify Taiwanese self-determination according to Article 77b of the Charter of the United Nations, which applies trusteeships to "territories which may be detached from enemy states as a result of the Second World War."
During the immediate postwar period, the Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) administration of Taiwan led to local discontent due to the large scale economic unrest produced by the civil war on mainland China. As Governor-General, Chen Yi took over and expanded the Japanese system of state monopolies in tobacco, sugar, camphor, tea, paper, chemicals, petroleum refining, and cement. He confiscated some 500 Japanese-owned factories and mines, and tens of thousands of private homes. The Shanghai newspaper Wen Hui Pao reported that Chen ran everything "from the hotel to the night-soil business." Economic mismanagement led to a large black market, runaway inflation and food shortages. Many commodities were confiscated and shipped to mainland China where they were sold for inflated prices furthering the general shortage of goods on the island. The price of rice rose to one hundred times its original value between the time the Chinese took over to the spring of 1946. It inflated further to four hundred times the original price by January, 1947.[1] Carpetbaggers from the mainland dominated nearly all industry, political and judicial offices, displacing the Taiwanese who were formerly employed; and many of the ROC garrison troops were highly undisciplined, looting, stealing, and contributing to the overall breakdown of infrastructure and public services. [2]
Many members of the mainland-dominated administration arrived on Taiwan with fresh images of their ravaged country and memories of Japanese atrocities on the mainland during Second Sino-Japanese War. As a result, anti-Japanese sentiment caused many to view the local Taiwanese who had been brought up and educated under the Japanese system as politically untrustworthy traitors. At the same time, many of the Taiwanese viewed mainlanders as being backwards and corrupt. Because the local Taiwanese elite had met with some success with local self government under Japanese rule, they had expected the same treatment from the incoming Nationalist government. However, the Nationalists opted for a different route, aiming for the centralization of government powers and a reduction in local authority. The Nationalists' nation-building efforts went this way because of unpleasant experiences with the centrifugal forces during the Warlord Era that had torn the government on the mainland. The different goals of the Nationalists and the Taiwanese, coupled with cultural misunderstandings and governmental corruption served to further inflame tensions on both sides.
Uprising and crackdown
The spark that set off the uprising occurred on February 27, 1947, when a police agent attempted to confiscate black market cigarettes from an elderly Taiwanese woman, Lin Jian-Mai. She resisted and, as accounts allege, was then pistol-whipped by the agents. An angry crowd soon gathered around the agents and the woman. After a warning shot fired by one of the agents went astray and killed an onlooker, the crowd pursued the agents to a nearby police station. The crowd surrounded the building, and demanded that the officer be given to them. The captain refused and the anger of the crowd heightened when it was discovered that the agents had been spirited out of the building via a rear entrance.
Violence finally flared the following morning on February 28. Security forces at the Governor-General's Office, using machine guns, fired on the unarmed demonstrators calling for the arrest and trial of the agents involved in the previous day's shooting, resulting in several deaths. [3] Formosans took over the administration of the town and military bases on March 4 and used the local radio station to caution against violence. [4] By evening, martial law had been declared and curfews were enforced by soldiers in trucks firing at anyone who violated curfew.
An American who had just arrived in China from Taihoku said that troops from the mainland arrived there on March 7 and indulged in three days of indiscriminate killing and looting. For a time everyone seen on the streets was shot at, homes were broken into and occupants killed. In the poorer sections the streets were said to have been littered with dead.
"There were instances of beheadings and mutilation of bodies, and women were raped," the American reported.[5]
For several weeks after the February 28 Incident, the rebels held control of much of the island. Though the initial uprising was spontaneous and peaceful, within a few days the rebels were generally coordinated and organized, and public order in rebel-held areas was upheld by temporary police forces organized by local high school students. Local leaders soon formed a Settlement Committee which presented the government with a list of 32 Demands for reform of the provincial administration. They demanded, among other things, greater autonomy, free elections, surrender of ROC Army to Settlement Committee and an end to governmental corruption. Motivations among the various rebel groups varied, some demanded greater autonomy within the ROC, while others wanted UN trusteeship or full independence. Around the same time, many were reportedly considering an appeal to the United Nations to put the island under an international mandate, since ROC's possession of Taiwan had not yet been formally recognized by any international treaties.[6] The Taiwanese also demanded representation in the forthcoming peace treaty negotiations with Japan, hoping to secure a plebiscite to determine the island's political future. A smaller subgroup including those that later formed the militia known as the "27 Brigade" (二七部隊), with their weapons looted from military bases in Taichung, were motivated by communist ideology. The Settlement Committee eventually settled upon the path of requesting greater autonomy, while stopping short of independence.
Feigning negotiation, the ROC authorities under Chen Yi stalled for time while assembling a large military force on the mainland in Fujian province. Upon arrival on March 8, the ROC troops launched a crackdown. By the end of March, Chen had jailed or killed all the leading rebels he could identify and catch. His troops reportedly executed (according to a Taiwanese delegation in Nanjing) between 3,000 and 4,000 people throughout the island. Chen Yi was later quoted by TIME magazine in April 7 1947 as saying: "It took the Japs 51 years to dominate this island. I expect to take about five years to re-educate the people so they will be happier with Chinese administration."[7]
Some of the killings were random, while others were systematic. Local elites were among those targeted, and many of the Taiwanese who had formed home rule groups during the reign of the Japanese were also victims of the 228 Incident. A disproportionate number of the victims were also Taiwanese middle and high school age youths, as many of them had volunteered to serve in the temporary police forces that were organized by the Committee and the local town councils to maintain public order following the initial rebellion. Several sources have claimed that ROC troops were arresting and executing anyone wearing a student uniform.[citation needed] Conversely, mainlanders were targeted by the rebels and many were killed.
The initial purge was followed by repression under one-party rule, in what was termed "white terror," which lasted until the end of martial law in 1987. Thousands of people, including both mainlanders and Taiwanese, were imprisoned or executed for their real or perceived dissent, leaving the Taiwanese victims among them with a deep-seated bitterness towards what they term the mainlander regime, and by extension, all mainlanders.
Since the lifting of martial law, the government has set up a civilian reparations fund supported by public donations for the victims and their families. However, only a few hundred have come forward to claim the money even though the deadline has been extended several times. This may be attributed to the fact that the incident has remained taboo in Taiwan until the lifting of martial law. As a result of this taboo, many descendants of victims remain unaware that their family members were victims, while many of the families of victims from the mainland have also never learned of their relatives' deaths.
Legacy
For several decades, the KMT-ruled government prohibited public discussion of the 228 Massacre and many children grew up without knowing this event had ever occurred. In the 1970s (still under a KMT-controlled government) the 228 Justice and Peace Movement was initiated by several citizens' groups to ask for a reversal of this policy, and, in 1992, the Executive Yuan promulgated the "February 28 Incident Research Report." Then-President and KMT-chairman Lee Teng-hui, who as a young communist participated in the incident, made a formal apology on behalf of the government in 1995 and declared February 28 a national holiday to commemorate the victims. Among other memorials erected, Taipei New Park was renamed 228 Memorial Park and the 228 Incident Memorial Foundation was established to compensate victims and their families. The families of the massacre victims have demanded the government declassify related documents in order to apprehend any living soldiers responsible for the incident, however the government has not yet acted on this request. [citation needed]
Prior to the 228 Incident, many Taiwanese desired greater autonomy from mainland China but not outright independence. The failure of conclusive dialogue with the ROC administration in early March, combined with the feelings of betrayal felt towards the government and mainland China in general are widely believed to have catalyzed the Taiwan independence movement.
Later, the KMT-dominated government systematically lay down a social network as well as numerous rules to discriminate against local Taiwanese and ensure better social status for those considered "one of the kin members." Financial subsidies and unfair screening rules in schools as well as government departments further deepened the divide. This mechanism, along with KMT's dominance in military, academics and government system, has been silently but firmly building up an invisible "segregation," that continues to fuel the simmering rivalry on this island.
On February 28 2004, thousands of Taiwanese participated in the 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally. They formed a 500-kilometer (300-mile) long human chain, from Taiwan's northernmost city, Keelung, to its southern tip, to commemorate the 228 Incident, to call for peace, and to protest the People's Republic of China's deployment of missiles aimed at Taiwan along the mainland coast. The event was organized by the Pan-Green Coalition. Over two-million individuals were estimated to have participated.
Some officials affiliated with the Pan-Blue Coalition have tried to suppress discussion of the 2-28 Incident and subsequent White Terror by stigmatizing continued raising of the subject as "hate speech" directed at all Chinese mainlanders who came over with Chiang Kai-shek. Pan-Green Coalition officials dismiss this as an attempt to reimpose the old taboo on the subject. Other Pan-Blue officials encourage open discussion of the matter, noting that it was a former KMT president (Lee Teng-hui) who apologized on behalf of the government and designated 2-28 as a memorial holiday. The subject remains a volatile one in Taiwan [3].
2-28 Incident in Art
A number of artists in Taiwan have addressed the subject of the 2-28 Incident since the taboo was lifted on the subject in 1997. The Incident has been the subject of music by Fan-Long Ko and Tyzen Hsiao and a number of literary works.
A film called Formosa Betrayed is due for release in 2008. The film is not based on the historical eyewitness account of the same title by American George H. Kerr, but instead deals with the era of political assassinations that followed the massacre and the period of White Terror.
See also
- History of Taiwan
- History of the Republic of China
- 228 Hand-in-Hand Rally (in 2004)
- Political status of Taiwan
- White Terror
References
- ^ "Formosa After the War". Reflection on the 228 Event—The first gunshot. 2003. Retrieved 2006-03-06.
- ^ ""This Is the Shame"". Time Magazine. 1946-06-10.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) (Subscription required) - ^ "Seizing-cigarettes Incident". Reflection on the 228 Event—The first gunshot. 2003. Retrieved 2006-03-06.
- ^ "Terror in Taiwan". New York Times. 1947. Retrieved 2006-04-22.
- ^ "Formosa killings are put at 10,000". New York Times, March 29, 1947. 1947. Retrieved 2006-04-22.
- ^ "Formosans' Plea For Red Aid Seen". The New York Times. 1947-03-30. Retrieved 2006-03-06.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ "Snow Red & Moon Angel". Time Magazine. 1947-04-07.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) (Subscription required) Full version at [1]
External links
- Formosa Betrayed, a political science book by George H. Kerr that offers a Western perspective and interpretation of the 2-28 incident.-Written in 1965
- [4], another Western perspective (Formosa Calling)-Written in 1948
- Taipei 228 Memorial Museum
- Collections of US Media Documentations
- Wikipedia Commons: Images Relevant to the 228 Incident
- Reflection on the 228 Event from Taiwan Human Rights InfoNet
- 228 Incident Memorial Foundation
- Bevin Chu, "Taiwan Independence and the 2-28 Incident", AntiWar.com
- Memorandum for the Ambassador on the Situation in Taiwan