Wikipedia:WikiProject Scientology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Tasks: added some people
Line 81: Line 81:
Discuss the format for each article based on the WikiProject. Include various categories applicable to the topic.
Discuss the format for each article based on the WikiProject. Include various categories applicable to the topic.
-->
-->
Dry and encyclopaedic is the goal here. Critical writings tend to be heavy on detail but very opinionated; pro-Scientology writing tends to cover what is important to the [[Church of Scientology]] but leaves out things the critics consider highly relevant. There is very little source material that is NPOV and not ''reasonably'' factually questionable by either side.
Dry and encyclopaedic is the goal here. Critical writings tend to be heavy on detail and references but very opinionated and POV; pro-Scientology writing tends to cover what is important to the [[Church of Scientology]] but leaves out things the critics consider highly relevant. There is very little source material that is NPOV and not ''reasonably'' factually questionable by either side.


Wikipedia (and [[:category:Scientology]]) has contributors who are knowledgeable critics, contributors who are CoS members and contributors who are non-CoS Scientologists. It should be possible to work together (or at least not conflicting overly) in a manner that self-evidently fits Wikipedia's goals, policies and guidelines and its mission as an encyclopedia.
Wikipedia (and [[:category:Scientology]]) has contributors who are knowledgeable critics, contributors who are CoS members and contributors who are non-CoS Scientologists. It should be possible to work together (or at least not conflicting overly) in a manner that self-evidently fits Wikipedia's goals, policies and guidelines and its mission as an encyclopedia.

Revision as of 11:39, 20 July 2005

Some Wikipedians have formed a project to better develop and organise information in articles related to Scientology. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians. If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there.

For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices.

Title

WikiProject on Scientology

Scope

To create and improve WP:NPOV, well-referenced and encyclopedic articles on all aspects of Scientology.

Parentage

No parent of this WikiProject has been defined.

Descendant WikiProjects

No descendant WikiProjects have been defined.

Category:Free Zone could really do with some work, if we can find a specialist or two.

Similar WikiProjects

No similar WikiProjects have been named.

Related WikiProjects

No related WikiProjects have been named.

Related WikiPortals

No related WikiPortals have been named.

No related Collaborations have been named.

Sister Project Searches

Participants

  • Antaeus Feldspar
  • ChrisO
  • David Gerard - never a Scientologist, Internet critic since 1995, apparently what passes for an expert [1]
  • Fernando Rizo - I have no inside knowledge of Scientology, but I want to help keep this controversial topic as NPOV as possible. 23:38, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • NicholasTurnbull - experienced Scientologist, now non-CoS (but not Free Zone)
  • Tεxτurε - No inside knowledge - neither convert nor critic (but a serious non-believer) - Would like to see both sides evenly presented. Currently too anti-Scientology in some sections.

Structure

Dry and encyclopaedic is the goal here. Critical writings tend to be heavy on detail and references but very opinionated and POV; pro-Scientology writing tends to cover what is important to the Church of Scientology but leaves out things the critics consider highly relevant. There is very little source material that is NPOV and not reasonably factually questionable by either side.

Wikipedia (and category:Scientology) has contributors who are knowledgeable critics, contributors who are CoS members and contributors who are non-CoS Scientologists. It should be possible to work together (or at least not conflicting overly) in a manner that self-evidently fits Wikipedia's goals, policies and guidelines and its mission as an encyclopedia.

I think it's important that we avoid variations from general Wikipedia policies, guidelines and styles on this project. Many projects do this and it's not a good thing IMO. Our work should be invisible except from the quality of the results - David Gerard 15:28, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hierarchy definition

No classification of this project has been defined.

Goals

  1. Create and expand NPOV encyclopaedic coverage of important topics regarding Scientology.
  2. Neither a critical POV, a pro-CoS POV or a pro-Scientology POV - describe all as relevant, but the article tone must be strictly neutral.
  3. High-quality and thorough referencing. Casual readers seem to find a lot of things about Scientology hard to believe.

Projects

Note: The projects below are merely my idea on how this project's work could be handled as separate collaboration projects. These haven't been agreed by anyone else on this project yet. Volunteers, and new projects, are welcomed. --NicholasTurnbull 22:55, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Critical Books Coverage Project
    Quite a number of key texts (like Kaufman's Inside Scientology/Dianetics) have absolutely no mention on the wiki, as far as I can determine. A project taskforce could be created to ensure adequate coverage of all key critical texts, by writing, editing and maitaining synopses and information about these books.
    Participants:
  2. History Article Project
    This project would be involved in editing, creating and cleaning up articles related to the history of Scientology, ensuring that there is a uniform coverage of Scientology's history both in individual articles and across all of the subjects pertaining to Scientology.
    Participants:
  3. L. Ron Hubbard Books Coverage Project
    This project would be involved with creating, maintaining and improving articles containing information and synopses of official Scientology books written by LRH. Many of LRH's books do not have a synopsis or even a stub, at the moment.
    Participants: NicholasTurnbull
  4. NPOV Review Project
    This project would provide internal peer review of material generated by this WikiProject, to check for proper balance and NPOV. Also, this project would check existing articles on Scientological subjects and correct POV material as appropriate.
    Participants:
  5. Technical Subject Article Project
    Many fundamental subjects in Scientology technology have absolutely no coverage at the moment in the encyclopedia. This project would create, maintain and improve articles related to Scientology technology and beliefs.
    Participants: NicholasTurnbull

Tasks

Note that we have a stub of our own, {{Scientology-stub}} - so if you think of an article to add to this list, you really might as well just start it, jot down whatever occurs to you off the top of your head and add that stub to it. Please try to add at least one reference, to help the next editor.

  1. Fix the stubs - expand and give full references
    1. Category:Scientology stubs
  2. Articles that need writing
    1. Scientology and psychiatry
  3. Topics important to the majority of Scientologists
    1. What does a CoS Scientologist want to learn about Scientology from an encyclopedia?
      1. ARC (Scientology) and the ARC Triangle
      2. Assists
      3. Auditing processes and procedures
      4. Clear (Scientology)
      5. Codes of Scientology, including:
        1. The Code of a Scientologist
        2. The Auditor's Code
        3. The Supervisor's Code
      6. Comm cycle
      7. Dianetic auditing procedure - including cost, duration of sessions, and frequency. Also, technical information (e.g. engrams, locks, chains, misdirectors, groupers, holders, denyers, etc.)
      8. E-meter - including photographs, description of operation, reads etc.
      9. Engram needs expansion regarding Scientology
      10. Ethics (Scientology) inc PTS/SP stuff, O/W writeups, etc.
      11. Exteriorisation (Scientology) inc info. about the Ext/Int R/D, Dianetics 55 processes etc.
      12. Grades (Scientology) inc. related information
      13. KRC (Scientology) and the KRC Triangle
      14. Management by statistics (Scientology) with reference to Ethics (Scientology)
      15. Mental image pictures inc. short reference to engrams. Includes stuff on service facsimiles, locks, etc.
      16. MEST (Scientology)
      17. Operating Thetan (currently a long stub, needs summaries of all levels)
      18. Overts & Withholds or O/Ws inc. Overt-motivator sequence
      19. Power Processes
      20. Purification Rundown - very critic POV; needs Scientologist coverage
      21. "Previous lifetime" stuff:
        1. Genetic Entity (GE) with reference to A History of Man
        2. Implant (Scientology) - needs the list from Space opera in Scientology doctrine
        3. New Era Dianetics (NED)
        4. NED for OTs (NOTs)
        5. etc.
      22. "Red" and "Green" volumes: Technical Bulletins and Administrative Bulletins
      23. Saint Hill Manor or AOSH
      24. Study tech
      25. Thetan
      26. The Tone Scale
      27. Information about and proper synopses of key Scientology texts: A History of Man, Book of Case Remedies, Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, Dianetics 55!, Introduction to Scientology Ethics, Science of Survival, Scientology: Fundamentals of Thought, etc.
        Note: There is probably much more to be added here, but this is just a start. Maybe a lot of these could be merged into some kind of "Fundamentals of Scientology" article. --NicholasTurnbull 21:30, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Topics specifically important to CoS-only Scientologists (e.g. IAS members and those "on lines" at orgs)
  5. Topics specifically important to non-CoS Scientologists (e.g. Free Zone members and unaffiliated Scientologists)
    1. Category:Free Zone is just about empty and needs a knowledgeable contributor or two.
  6. Topics important to critics of Scientology
    1. Scientology and celebrities
    2. What topics are particularly popular on Operation Clambake? Someone needs to go through them
    3. Key critical books and articles
      1. Atack, Jonathan. A Piece Of Blue Sky.
      2. Burroughs, William S. Burroughs On Scientology, Los Angeles Free Press, 6th March 1970.
      3. Cooper, Paulette. The Scandal of Scientology.
      4. Forté, Major John. The Commodore and the Colonels.
      5. Kaufman, Robert. Inside Scientology/Dianetics.
      6. Miller, Russell. Bare-faced Messiah.
    4. Matters within the Church of Scientology of interest to critics
      1. Copyright and the Church of Scientology
      2. Church of Spiritual Technology (CST) the "secret" management of the CoS; known only by a PO Box
      3. Estates Project Force (EPF)
      4. Guardian's Office (GO)
      5. Office of Special Affairs (OSA)
      6. Operation Snow White
      7. OT Levels (Scientology) - OT III already has good coverage in Space opera in Scientology doctrine and Xenu
      8. Overboarding (Scientology) - not quite sure about this one; re. overboarding on the Apollo
      9. Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF) and the RPF's RPF
      10. Religious Technology Center (RTC) - the "semi-secret" management
      11. Sea Organisation or Sea Org - the main Church of Scientology nexus
  7. Put {{scientology}} (the project template) on the talk page of all relevant articles
  8. POV Scientology articles requiring attention
    1. Church of Scientology - slight critical POV, low priority
    2. Purification Rundown - distinct critical POV, high priority
  9. People notable in the context of Scientology
    1. Notable CoS public Scientologists (Category:Scientologists)
      1. Anne Archer
      2. Chick Corea
      3. Isaac Hayes
      4. John Travolta
      5. Keith Code
      6. Kirstie Alley
      7. Tom Cruise
    2. Notable CoS staff members (e.g. management, prominent Sea Org and OSA staff)
      1. David Miscavige Chairman of the Board, RTC
      2. Guillaume Lesevre ED INT, Church of Scientology
      3. Helena Kobrin apparently now disappeared; originally from Legal, OSA INT
      4. Mark Rathbun Inspector General, RTC
      5. Mary Sue Hubbard L. Ron Hubbard's wife, now deceased; often referred to as MSH
      6. Mike Rinder, ED OSA INT
      7. Warren McShane Deputy Inspector General for Legal Affairs, RTC
    3. Notable Freezone and Independent Scientologists
      1. Bill Robertson aka. Captain Bill Robertson or CBR; formerly LRH's right hand man
      2. David Mayo original contributor to upper level materials and founder of the Advanced Ability Center organisation (now defunct)
      3. Heidrun Beer freezoner; has had some interference from the CoS
      4. Ralph Hilton prominent Freezoner and technical enthusiast. Runs FZAOINT, I seem to recall.
      5. Ray Kemp - former mission holder and one of LRH's closer friends. Alleged author of the OCA/APA Test.
    4. Notable critics (Category:Critics of Scientology)
      1. Andreas Heldal-Lund has a stub
      2. Arnaldo Lerma has a stub
      3. David S. Touretzky Professor at CMU; long history of being a CoS critic
      4. Gerald Armstrong Very long lawsuit with the CoS over alleged contract breach; notable writer
      5. Jesse Prince famous ex-member
      6. Jon Atack or Jonathan Atack or Jonathan C. Atack - probably the first, it's the name he's most known as
      7. Larry Wollersheim - high profile lawsuit and outspoken critic
      8. Ron Newman has a v short article
      9. Steve Fishman of Fishman affidavit fame, one of the first to publicise the OT materials
      10. Just posting to a.r.s probably isn't enough, nor even a popular website unless it's Operation Clambake ... real-world influence, e.g. lawsuits, writing a book, frequent media (discussion needed)

General strategy and discussion forums

Other subpages

Templates

Infoboxes

We had an old Template:Scientology (before MediaWiki had categories), but it was (a) redundant with the category (b) IMO very much from a critical POV in the article selection.

In order to help avoid something POV-leaning (a common failing with article series boxes — see WP:CLS), I've made Template:Scientology the WikiProject box for article talk pages:

I really think we can do everything a reader would need with carefully-chosen category names and sorting, and infoboxes are unneccesary - David Gerard 20:48, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stub templates

Use {{Scientology-stub}}. This will put:

The article will also be added to Category:Scientology stubs.

Other templates

Categories

Lists

Articles

Wikipedia articles on Scientology

New Wikipedia articles related to Scientology

Please feel free to list your new Scientology-related articles here (newer articles at the top, please). Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them should be suggested for the Did you know? box on the Main Wikipedia page. DYN has a 72 hr. time limit from the creation of the article.

Did you know?

  • The record for the most FOIA requests filed by a single individual is held by a former Scientologist, Barbara Schwarz.

Article improvement drive

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

Collaboration of the week

Peer review

Featured article candidates

  • We want to get Space opera in Scientology nominated soon.
    I think ChrisO is currently off on holiday, annoyingly enough - he has the source material and references to help with the thornier FAC shrubbery requests - David Gerard 11:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Just a long weekend, David - I was up in Newcastle seeing this lot performing. :-) -- ChrisO 18:23, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Featured articles

Votes for deletion

Requests

Resources

Archives