Bell YAH-63: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 0 sources and tagging 1 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta15)
No edit summary
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Pre-production attack helicopter}}
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout. -->
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout. -->
{|{{Infobox aircraft begin
{|{{Infobox aircraft begin
|name= YAH-63A
| name = YAH-63A
|image= File:U.S. Army YAH-63.jpg
| image = File:U.S. Army YAH-63.jpg
|caption= A YAH-63A prototype
| caption = A YAH-63A prototype
}}{{Infobox aircraft type
}}{{Infobox aircraft type
|type= [[Attack helicopter]]
| type = [[Attack helicopter]]
|national origin= United States
| national origin = United States
|manufacturer= [[Bell Helicopter]]
| manufacturer = [[Bell Helicopter]]
|designer=
| designer =
|first flight= 1 October 1975
| first flight = 1 October 1975
|introduced=
| introduced =
|retired=
| retired =
|status=
| status = Cancelled
|primary user= [[United States Army]]
| primary user = [[United States Army]]
|more users=
| more users =
|produced=
| produced =
|number built= 3
| number built = 3
|unit cost=
| unit cost =
|developed from=
| developed from =
|variants with their own articles=
| variants with their own articles =
}}
}}
|}
|}
Line 26: Line 27:


==Design and development==
==Design and development==
===Background===
During the mid-1960s, [[United States Army]] initiated the Advanced Aerial Fire Support System (AAFSS) program to develop the Lockheed [[AH-56 Cheyenne]] for the anti-tank gunship role. The U.S. Army pursued the [[AH-1 Cobra|AH-1G HueyCobra]] as an interim type for the "jungle fighting" role. However the Army's broader concern was the task of protecting Western Europe from the legions of Warsaw Pact armor to the east.<ref name=Vector_all>Greg Goebel. [http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html First Generation Cobras] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120408211614/http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html |date=April 8, 2012 }}. Vectorsite, 1 December 2008.</ref>
During the mid-1960s, [[United States Army]] initiated the Advanced Aerial Fire Support System (AAFSS) program to develop the [[Lockheed AH-56 Cheyenne]] for the anti-tank gunship role. The U.S. Army pursued the [[AH-1 Cobra|AH-1G HueyCobra]] as an interim type for the "jungle fighting" role. However the Army's broader concern was the task of protecting Western Europe from the numerous Warsaw Pact tanks to the east.<ref name=Vector_all>Greg Goebel. [http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html First Generation Cobras] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120408211614/http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html |date=April 8, 2012 }}. Vectorsite, 1 December 2008.</ref>


In 1972, the Army conducted an evaluation between the [[Bell 309 KingCobra]], the Lockheed Cheyenne, and the [[Sikorsky S-67]] in a competitive fly-off. The fly-off began in the spring of 1972 and was completed in July. In August, somewhat to everyone's shock, the Army rejected all three competitors.<ref name=Vectorsite>Greg Goebel. [http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html#m4 Model 309 Kingcobra / Model 409 AAH (YAH-63)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120408211614/http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html |date=2012-04-08 }}. Vectorsite, 1 December 2008.</ref>
In 1972, the Army conducted an evaluation between the [[Bell 309 KingCobra]], the Lockheed Cheyenne, and the [[Sikorsky S-67]] in a competitive fly-off. The fly-off began in the spring 1972 and was completed in July. In August, somewhat to everyone's shock, the Army rejected all three competitors.<ref name=Vectorsite>Greg Goebel. [http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html#m4 Model 309 Kingcobra / Model 409 AAH (YAH-63)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120408211614/http://www.vectorsite.net/avcobra_1.html |date=2012-04-08 }}. Vectorsite, 1 December 2008.</ref>


Difficulties delayed the AH-56 Cheyenne development. The Army canceled the Cheyenne program in August 1972. Controversy over the Cheyenne's role in combat and the political climate regarding military acquisition programs caused the Army to amend the service's attack helicopter requirements in favor of a simpler and more survivable conventional helicopter.<ref name=Robb>Robb, Raymond L. [https://vtol.org/store/product/vertiflite-summer-2006-6085.cfm "Hybrid helicopters: Compounding the quest for speed"]. ''Vertiflite''. Summer 2006. American Helicopter Society.</ref><ref name=Abridged_Army/>
Difficulties delayed the AH-56 Cheyenne development. The Army canceled the Cheyenne program in August 1972. Controversy over the Cheyenne's role in combat and the political climate regarding military acquisition programs caused the Army to amend the service's attack helicopter requirements in favor of a simpler and more survivable conventional helicopter.<ref name=Robb>Robb, Raymond L. [https://vtol.org/store/product/vertiflite-summer-2006-6085.cfm "Hybrid helicopters: Compounding the quest for speed"]. ''Vertiflite''. Summer 2006. American Helicopter Society.</ref><ref name=Abridged_Army/>


===Advanced Attack Helicopter===
===Advanced Attack Helicopter===
The Army sought an aircraft to fill an anti-armor attack role. The Army wanted an aircraft better than the AH-1 Cobra in firepower, performance and range. The aircraft would have the maneuverability to fly [[nap-of-the-earth]] (NoE) missions. To this end, the U.S. Army issued a request for proposals (RFP) for an [[Advanced Attack Helicopter]] (AAH) in 1972.<ref name=Abridged_Army>Office of the Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the Army (OAVCSA). [https://www.webcitation.org/5JNGWqTeh?url=http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=%2Fp4013coll11&CISOPTR=175&REC=1 ''An Abridged History of the Army Attack Helicopter Program'']. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 1973.</ref><ref name=Osprey_AH-64>Bishop, Chris. ''Apache AH-64 Boeing (McDonnell Douglas) 1976–2005''. Osprey Publishing, 2005. {{ISBN|1-84176-816-2}}.</ref>
The Army sought an aircraft to fill an anti-armor attack role. The Army wanted an aircraft better than the AH-1 Cobra in firepower, performance and range. The aircraft would have the maneuverability to fly [[nap-of-the-earth]] (NoE) missions. To this end, the U.S. Army issued a request for proposals (RFP) for an [[Advanced Attack Helicopter]] (AAH) in 1972.<ref name=Abridged_Army>Office of the Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the Army (OAVCSA). [https://web.archive.org/web/20060712135303/http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=%2Fp4013coll11&CISOPTR=175&REC=1 ''An Abridged History of the Army Attack Helicopter Program'']. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 1973.</ref><ref name=Osprey_AH-64>Bishop, Chris. ''Apache AH-64 Boeing (McDonnell Douglas) 1976–2005''. Osprey Publishing, 2005. {{ISBN|1-84176-816-2}}.</ref>


The Army specified that the AAH was to be powered by twin General Electric T700 turboshaft engines with 1,500 shp (1,120&nbsp;kW) each. This was the same powerplant fit specified for a new Army utility helicopter competition that would be won by the [[Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk|Sikorsky S-70 Black Hawk]]. The AAH would be armed with a 30 millimeter cannon and sixteen [[BGM-71 TOW]] anti-tank missiles. The missile armament specification was later modified to include an alternate load of sixteen laser-guided [[AGM-114 Hellfire]] anti-tank missiles. Hellfire was then in development and promised greater range and lethality than TOW.<ref name=Vectorsite/>
The Army specified that the AAH was to be powered by twin General Electric T700 turboshaft engines with 1,500 shp (1,120&nbsp;kW) each. This was the same powerplant fit specified for a new Army utility helicopter competition that would be won by the [[Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk|Sikorsky S-70 Black Hawk]]. The AAH would be armed with a 30 millimeter cannon and sixteen [[BGM-71 TOW]] anti-tank missiles. The missile armament specification was later modified to include an alternate load of sixteen laser-guided [[AGM-114 Hellfire]] anti-tank missiles. Hellfire was then in development and promised greater range and lethality than TOW.<ref name=Vectorsite/>
Line 52: Line 54:


==Specifications (YAH-63)==
==Specifications (YAH-63)==
{{Aircraft specs
{{aircraft specifications
<!-- If you do not understand how to use this template, please ask at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please answer the following questions. -->
|plane or copter?=copter
|jet or prop?=prop
<!-- Now, fill out the specs. Please include units where appropriate (main comes first, alt in parentheses).
If an item doesn't apply, like capacity, leave it blank. For additional lines, end your alt units with a right parenthesis ")" and start a new, fully-formatted line beginning with an asterisk "*"-->
|ref= International Directory of Military Aircraft, 2002-2003<ref name=Frawley_Military>Frawley, Gerard. ''The International Directory of Military Aircraft'', p. 148. Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd, 2002. {{ISBN|1-875671-55-2}}.</ref>
|ref= International Directory of Military Aircraft, 2002-2003<ref name=Frawley_Military>Frawley, Gerard. ''The International Directory of Military Aircraft'', p. 148. Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd, 2002. {{ISBN|1-875671-55-2}}.</ref>
|prime units?=kts
<!-- General characteristics
-->
|crew=2
|length ft=44
|length in=7
|length note=
|width ft=<!-- if applicable -->
|width in=<!-- if applicable -->
|width note=
|height ft=13
|height in=5
|height note=
|empty weight lb=6600
|empty weight note=
|gross weight lb=
|gross weight note=
|max takeoff weight lb=14750
|max takeoff weight note=
|fuel capacity=
|more general=
<!-- Powerplant
-->
|eng1 number=2
|eng1 name=[[General Electric T700]]
|eng1 type=[[turboshaft]] engines
|eng1 shp=1680
|eng1 note=


|rot number=1
|crew=two: one pilot, one CPG (co-pilot/gunner)
|span main= 48 ft
|rot dia ft=48
|rot dia in=
|span alt= 14.6 m
|rot area sqft=530.83
|flight endurance= 3 hr, 30 min
|rot area note=<!--<br>
|length main=44 ft 7 in
*'''Blade section:''' - '''root:''' [[NACA airfoil|NACA ]]; '''tip:''' [[NACA airfoil|NACA ]]<ref name="Selig">{{cite web |last1=Lednicer |first1=David |title=The Incomplete Guide to Airfoil Usage |url=https://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/ads/aircraft.html |website=m-selig.ae.illinois.edu |accessdate=16 April 2019}}</ref>-->
|length alt=13.6 m
<!-- Performance
|height main=13 ft 5 in
-->
|height alt=4.1 m
|max speed kts=170
|area main= 530.83 ft²
|max speed note=
|area alt= 168.1 m²
|cruise speed kts=
|empty weight main=6,600 lb
|cruise speed note=
|empty weight alt=2,993 kg
|never exceed speed kts=
|loaded weight main=
|never exceed speed note=
|loaded weight alt=
|range nmi=317
|max takeoff weight main=14,750 lb
|range note=
|max takeoff weight alt=6,690 kg
|combat range nmi=

|combat range note=
|engine (prop)=[[General Electric T700]]
|ferry range nmi=
|type of prop=[[turboshaft]]
|ferry range note=
|number of props=2
|endurance=3 hours 30 minutes
|power main=1,680 shp
|ceiling ft=12200
|power alt=1,300 kW
|ceiling note=

|climb rate ftmin=1620
|max speed main=170 knots
|climb rate note=
|max speed alt=210 mph, 338 km/h
|time to altitude=
|range main=317 nmi
|disk loading lb/sqft=
|range alt=365 mi, 587 km
|disk loading note=
|ceiling main=12,200 ft
|fuel consumption lb/mi=
|ceiling alt=3,720 m
|power/mass=
|climb rate main=1,620 ft/min
|more performance=
|climb rate alt=8.2 m/s
<!-- Armament
|power/mass main=
-->
|power/mass alt=
|armament=* [[U.S. Helicopter Armament Subsystems|XM188 Gatling gun]] 3-barreled 30 mm cannon
|armament=
* [[U.S. Helicopter Armament Subsystems|XM188 Gatling gun]] 3-barreled 30 mm cannon
* 2.75&nbsp;in (70&nbsp;mm) rockets: 14 rockets mounted in M or M launchers
* 2.75&nbsp;in (70&nbsp;mm) rockets: 14 rockets mounted in M or M launchers
* [[BGM-71 TOW|TOW Missiles]]: 4 or 8 missiles mounted in two-missile launchers on each hardpoint
* [[BGM-71 TOW|TOW Missiles]]: 4 or 8 missiles mounted in two-missile launchers on each hardpoint
|avionics=
}}
}}


Line 120: Line 147:
==External links==
==External links==
{{commons category|Bell YAH-63}}
{{commons category|Bell YAH-63}}
* [http://www.dtic.mil/srch/doc?collection=t3&id=ADA125642 YAH-63 Helicopter Crashworthiness Simulation and Analysis]{{Dead link|date=June 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}. U.S. Army, February 1983.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20150925061100/http://www.dtic.mil/srch/doc?collection=t3&id=ADA125642 YAH-63 Helicopter Crashworthiness Simulation and Analysis]. U.S. Army, February 1983.


{{Bell Aircraft}}
{{Bell Aircraft}}
{{Huey family}}
{{USAF helicopters}}
{{USAF helicopters}}


Line 130: Line 158:
[[Category:1970s United States helicopters]]
[[Category:1970s United States helicopters]]
[[Category:Twin-turbine helicopters]]
[[Category:Twin-turbine helicopters]]
[[Category:Attack helicopters]]
[[Category:Aircraft first flown in 1975]]
[[Category:Aircraft first flown in 1975]]

Latest revision as of 07:40, 25 December 2023

YAH-63A
A YAH-63A prototype
Role Attack helicopter
National origin United States
Manufacturer Bell Helicopter
First flight 1 October 1975
Status Cancelled
Primary user United States Army
Number built 3

The Bell YAH-63 (Model 409) was an experimental attack helicopter for the Advanced Attack Helicopter (AAH) competition. Hughes' Model 77/YAH-64, later developed into the AH-64 Apache, was selected over Bell's entry.

Design and development[edit]

Background[edit]

During the mid-1960s, United States Army initiated the Advanced Aerial Fire Support System (AAFSS) program to develop the Lockheed AH-56 Cheyenne for the anti-tank gunship role. The U.S. Army pursued the AH-1G HueyCobra as an interim type for the "jungle fighting" role. However the Army's broader concern was the task of protecting Western Europe from the numerous Warsaw Pact tanks to the east.[1]

In 1972, the Army conducted an evaluation between the Bell 309 KingCobra, the Lockheed Cheyenne, and the Sikorsky S-67 in a competitive fly-off. The fly-off began in the spring 1972 and was completed in July. In August, somewhat to everyone's shock, the Army rejected all three competitors.[2]

Difficulties delayed the AH-56 Cheyenne development. The Army canceled the Cheyenne program in August 1972. Controversy over the Cheyenne's role in combat and the political climate regarding military acquisition programs caused the Army to amend the service's attack helicopter requirements in favor of a simpler and more survivable conventional helicopter.[3][4]

Advanced Attack Helicopter[edit]

The Army sought an aircraft to fill an anti-armor attack role. The Army wanted an aircraft better than the AH-1 Cobra in firepower, performance and range. The aircraft would have the maneuverability to fly nap-of-the-earth (NoE) missions. To this end, the U.S. Army issued a request for proposals (RFP) for an Advanced Attack Helicopter (AAH) in 1972.[4][5]

The Army specified that the AAH was to be powered by twin General Electric T700 turboshaft engines with 1,500 shp (1,120 kW) each. This was the same powerplant fit specified for a new Army utility helicopter competition that would be won by the Sikorsky S-70 Black Hawk. The AAH would be armed with a 30 millimeter cannon and sixteen BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missiles. The missile armament specification was later modified to include an alternate load of sixteen laser-guided AGM-114 Hellfire anti-tank missiles. Hellfire was then in development and promised greater range and lethality than TOW.[2]

Bell, Boeing-Vertol (teamed with Grumman), Hughes, Lockheed, and Sikorsky all submitted proposals for the AAH program. In June 1973, Bell and Hughes were selected as finalists, and each was awarded a contract for the construction of two prototype aircraft.[6]

The Bell entry, the Model 409 (YAH-63), was by no means "just another Cobra design" though it utilized Cobra technology where possible. Although it had what had become by then the typical configuration for a helicopter gunship, with a sharklike fuselage, tandem crew seating, and stub wings for armament, the YAH-63 was largely a new machine.[2]

Distinctive features included wheeled tricycle landing gear, flat canopy window plates, an unusual "tee" tail, a large ventral fin, and a three-barreled General Electric XM-188 30 mm (1.18 in) cannon. The YAH-63's rotor mast could be lowered and the landing gear could kneel to reduce its height for transport.[7] One less noticeable feature was that the pilot occupied the front seat instead of the rear, the reverse of the AH-1's arrangement. This was believed to be more prudent since the YAH-63 was intended to fly "in the treetops" during "nap-of-the-earth" (NoE) operations, and the pilot needed to have a clear view of the aircraft's surroundings.[2]

The first prototype of the YAH-63 (serial 73-22246)[8] made its initial flight on 1 October 1975. This rotorcraft crashed in June 1976 but a static test prototype was brought up to flight standard and, along with the second prototype (73-22247), entered the flyoff against the Hughes entry, the Model 77 (YAH-64).[2]

The Hughes YAH-64 was selected in December 1976 and was developed into the production AH-64 Apache version. The Army believed that the YAH-63's two-blade rotor was more vulnerable to damage than the Apache's four-bladed rotor. In addition the service did not like the YAH-63's tricycle landing gear scheme, believing it was less stable than the Apache's "taildragger" configuration. Some observers also suspected that the Army did not want to divert Bell from AH-1 production.[2] Bell would use its experience with the T700 engine to develop the AH-1T+ design and later AH-1W.[9]

Operators[edit]

 United States

Specifications (YAH-63)[edit]

Data from International Directory of Military Aircraft, 2002-2003[10]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 2
  • Length: 44 ft 7 in (13.59 m)
  • Height: 13 ft 5 in (4.09 m)
  • Empty weight: 6,600 lb (2,994 kg)
  • Max takeoff weight: 14,750 lb (6,690 kg)
  • Powerplant: 2 × General Electric T700 turboshaft engines, 1,680 shp (1,250 kW) each
  • Main rotor diameter: 48 ft (15 m)
  • Main rotor area: 530.83 sq ft (49.316 m2)

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 170 kn (200 mph, 310 km/h)
  • Range: 317 nmi (365 mi, 587 km)
  • Endurance: 3 hours 30 minutes
  • Service ceiling: 12,200 ft (3,700 m)
  • Rate of climb: 1,620 ft/min (8.2 m/s)

Armament

  • XM188 Gatling gun 3-barreled 30 mm cannon
  • 2.75 in (70 mm) rockets: 14 rockets mounted in M or M launchers
  • TOW Missiles: 4 or 8 missiles mounted in two-missile launchers on each hardpoint

See also[edit]

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

References[edit]

  1. ^ Greg Goebel. First Generation Cobras Archived April 8, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Vectorsite, 1 December 2008.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Greg Goebel. Model 309 Kingcobra / Model 409 AAH (YAH-63) Archived 2012-04-08 at the Wayback Machine. Vectorsite, 1 December 2008.
  3. ^ Robb, Raymond L. "Hybrid helicopters: Compounding the quest for speed". Vertiflite. Summer 2006. American Helicopter Society.
  4. ^ a b Office of the Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the Army (OAVCSA). An Abridged History of the Army Attack Helicopter Program. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 1973.
  5. ^ Bishop, Chris. Apache AH-64 Boeing (McDonnell Douglas) 1976–2005. Osprey Publishing, 2005. ISBN 1-84176-816-2.
  6. ^ Bishop, Chris. Huey Cobra Gunships. Osprey Publishing, 2006. ISBN 1-84176-984-3.
  7. ^ Verier 1990, p. 142.
  8. ^ Pike, John. YAH-63. GlobalSecurity.org, 12 January 2008.
  9. ^ Verier 1990, pp. 143-144.
  10. ^ Frawley, Gerard. The International Directory of Military Aircraft, p. 148. Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd, 2002. ISBN 1-875671-55-2.

External links[edit]