User talk:Renamed user owrgjw35p9gh8eigh

Hello, Renamed user owrgjw35p9gh8eigh. You have new messages at Phyesalis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tincture

Your "citation needed" tag is rather pointless. The word "Or" could be capitalized for any of three reasons: 1) In some styles of blazoning, all color words are capitalized. 2) To emphasize a word which is semantically very important for blazoning, but which is short (two letters) and in its lowercase form easily visually overlooked (containing no typographic wide letters, ascenders, or descenders). 3) The rather obvious fact that the conjunction and tincture name are otherwise spelled identically. AnonMoos (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthrosexual

Since you are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, i would appreciate it if you could voice your opinion on the article Anthrosexual, which is currently up for deletion.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 06:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Profanity Discussion Edit

Hi, recently you undid an edit modifying a previous comment, saying "removal of other people's comments deserves at least an edit summary". However I'd just like to let you know that I was the one who both wrote and modified the comment, and in any case I left a description of my changes in the subsequent comment. --Iamthedeus (talk) 14:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Deprecated

Thanks! A little late, oh well. I learn something new everyday on Wiki :-D I appreciate you taking the time to explain. MikelZap (talk) 16:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Play party (BDSM) (2nd nomination)

Since you are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, i would appreciate it if you could voice your opinion on the article Play party (BDSM), which is currently up for deletion. --Simon Speed (talk) 22:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

This newsletter was delivered by §hepBot around 16:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC). ShepBot (talk) 16:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:You spread it?

Iam sorry if you not understood the meaning. The images in that article is together. It is sick too see those sort of images when together so i spread the images to all over the article. --SkyWalker (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

till

I always assumed that the word "till" was solely used as a verb (or noun)—e.g. to till land and the like—and that its use was incorrect. Perhaps I'm wrong, but "until" is more modern and standard now anyway, is it not? = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 14:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, tone it down a bit[3]. This isn't a contest to see who knows the language better. But if it were, I would win:[4]

V. Summary and Conclusions

1. TILL and UNTIL are not synonyms.
2. UNTIL is marked for the distinctive feature RESULT which makes it suitable to represent time from the point of view of KAIROS: "a point in time filled with a significance, charged with a meaning derived from its relation to the end."
3. TILL is unmarked for PROCESS/RESULT which makes it suitable to represent time both as CHRONOS: "passing of time" or "waiting time" or KAIROS.
4. This semantic distinction is what motivates their non-random distribution in both spoken and written discourse on the micro- and the macro-levels.
5. The theoretical and methodological motto of this paper is therefore:

MEANING MOTIVATES DISTRIBUTION!

Even though the semantic distinction between TILL/UNTIL is subtle, in the words of Dwight Bolinger (1971:17): ... who says semantic distinctions have to be gross?

-NJGW (talk) 19:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Ejaculation

The video add nothing to the article, would you add a video two people actively engaged in intercourse for the intercourse article? Yami (talk) 21:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter (July 2008)

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Ejaculation article

You have commented in the past either for or against a video or image on the ejaculation article. There is currently a survey discussing this topic if you care to offer your opinion. Atom (talk) 13:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

"sensible order"

Ah, I just noticed that they're in alphabetical order. That's okay, I guess. I think the categorization looks nicer to have things in order:

• World religion
  • Western\Abrahamic religion by chronological order (Judaism, Christianity, Islam)
  • Eastern\Dharmic religion by chronological order (Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, Taoism etc..)
• New religious movements and smaller religious traditions

Hence:

• Judaism
• Christianity
• Islam
• Hinduism
• Buddhism
• Taoism
• Wicca

This way, the content is actually put together somewhat by category, rather than jumping around across the globe, theologically.

However, I'm not going to bother debating extensively over something so trivial. If you disagree, that's fine too. ☯  Zenwhat (talk) 02:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

A year and a half or so I did exactly that, and some editor was offended that I put Judaism before Christianity! I explained it was in order chronologically, but he fought it, which is why it was in the order you found it. Thanks Atom (talk) 03:57, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Masturbation

“ That may be so, but that shouldn't mean you should duplicate pics. Keep the real pics, AS THEY ARE REAL. If you need images, use ones... ”

I hit 'enter' before I could finish. I was going to say that you should use images of other things, such as dildos and etc. instead. Masturbation does not exclusively require the use of fingers to achieve a climax. A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 20:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Replied on my page, A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 16:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Added my reply on my page. A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 16:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Replied. A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 17:05, 3 September 2008 (UTC)