Solomon ibn Gabirol: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Link
(200 intermediate revisions by 76 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|11th-century Andalusian poet and Jewish philosopher}}
{{refimprove|date=October 2015}}

{{Infobox philosopher
{{Infobox philosopher
| name = Solomon ben Yehuda ibn Gabirol<br>Avicebron
| name = Solomon ben Yehuda ibn Gabirol<br />Avicebron
| image = Ibn Gabirol.JPG
| image = Ibn Gabirol.JPG
| image_size =
| caption = Modern depiction of Ibn Gabirol
| caption = Statue of Ibn Gabiroltw
| other_names = Avicebron, Avicebrol
| other_names = Avicebron
| birth_date = 1021 or 1022
| birth_date = 1021 1022
| birth_place = [[Málaga]], [[Caliphate of Cordoba]]
| birth_place = [[Málaga]]
| death_date = 1070 (1050?, 1058?)
| death_place = [[Valencia]], [[Taifa of Valencia]]/[[Taifa of Toledo|Toledo]]
| death_date = 1050 — 1070
| death_place = [[Valencia]]
| era = [[Medieval philosophy]]
| era = [[Medieval Philosophy]]
| region = [[Jewish philosophy]]
| school_tradition = [[Neoplatonism]]
| region =
| main_interests = [[Religious philosophy]]
| religion =
| notable_ideas =
| school_tradition = [[Jewish philosophy]]
| books = Fons Vitæ
| influences =
| influenced =
| books = ''Fons Vitæ''
}}
}}
[[file:Ibn Gabirol, Caesarea.jpg|right|thumbnail|Statue of Ibn Gairol at the [[Ralli Museum (Caesarea)|Ralli Museum]], [[Caesarea]], [[Israel]]]]


'''Solomon ibn Gabirol''' (alt. '''Solomon ben Judah''') ({{lang-he|שלמה בן יהודה אבן גבירול}}, {{IPA-he|ʃlɵ.mɵ bɛn jɛ.ˈhuː.də ˈɪ.bn ˌgə.bi.ˈrɒːl|pron}}; {{lang-ar|أبوأيوب سليمان بن يحيى بن جبيرول}}, {{IPA-ar|ɑː.ˈbuː ɑːʕ.ˈʕuːb ˌsuː.leɪ.ˈmɑːn ˈɪ.bn ˌdʒɑː.biː.ˈruːl|pron}}) was an 11th century [[al-Andalus|Andalusian]] [[poet]] and Jewish [[philosopher]] with a [[Neoplatonism|Neo-Platonic]] bent. One source credits Ibn Gabirol with creating a [[golem]].<ref name=golem/>
'''Solomon ibn Gabirol''' or '''Solomon ben Judah''' ({{lang-he|ר׳ שְׁלֹמֹה בֶּן יְהוּדָה אִבְּן גָּבִּירוֹל|Shlomo Ben Yehuda ibn Gabirol}}, {{IPA-he|ʃ(e)loˈmo ben jehuˈda ʔibn ɡabiˈʁol|pron}}; {{lang-ar|أبو أيوب سليمان بن يحيى بن جبيرول|’Abū ’Ayyūb Sulaymān bin Yaḥyá bin Jabīrūl}}, {{IPA-ar|ˈʔæbuː ʔæjˈjuːb sʊlæjˈmæːn bɪn ˈjæħjæː bɪn dʒæbiːˈruːl|pron}}) was an 11th-century [[al-Andalus|Andalusi]] [[poet]] and [[Jewish philosopher]] in the [[Neoplatonism|Neo-Platonic]] tradition. He published over a hundred poems, as well as works of biblical exegesis, philosophy, ethics<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxvii}} and satire.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}} One source credits ibn Gabirol with creating a [[golem]],<ref name=golem/> possibly female, for household chores.<ref name=stanford/>


In the nineteenth century it was discovered that medieval translators had [[Latinization of names|Latinized]] Gabirol's to '''Avicebron''' and had translated his work on Jewish Neo-Platonic philosophy into a Latin form that had in the intervening centuries been highly regarded as a work of Islamic or Christian scholarship.<ref name=eb9/><ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxxii}}
In the 19th century it was discovered that medieval translators had [[Latinisation of names|Latinized]] Gabirol's name to '''Avicebron''' or '''Avencebrol''' and had translated his work on Jewish Neo-Platonic philosophy into a Latin form that had in the intervening centuries been highly regarded as a work of Islamic or Christian scholarship.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxxii}}<ref name=eb9/> As such, ibn Gabirol is well known in the history of philosophy for the doctrine that all things, including soul and intellect, are composed of matter and form ("Universal [[Hylomorphism]]"), and for his emphasis on divine will.<ref name=stanford/>


==Biography==
==Biography==
[[File:Malaga-Al_Malaqui-20110921.jpg|thumb|Ibn Gabirol statue in [[Málaga]], Spain.]]
[[File:Mivhar-Peninim-1899-London-HB37435.pdf|thumb|left|''Mivhar ha-Peninim'' by Solomon ibn Gabirol, 1899 edition with corrected text and a facing English translation.<ref name=hb37435/>]]
[[File:Ibn_Gabirol,_Caesarea.jpg|thumb|Statue in [[Caesarea, Israel]].]]
Little is known of Gabirol's life, and some sources give contradictory information.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xvi}} Sources agree that he was born in [[Málaga]], but are unclear whether in late 1021 or early 1022 CE.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xvii}} The year of his death is in greater dispute, with one set of scholars contending that he died before age 30, while others assert that he died either 1069 or 1070.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxvii}} Still others{{citation needed|date=October 2015}} believe he died around 1058 in [[Valencia (city in Spain)|Valencia]].
Little is known of Gabirol's life, and some sources give contradictory information.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xvi}} Sources agree that he was born in [[Málaga]], but are unclear whether in late 1021 or early 1022 CE.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xvii}} The year of his death is a matter of dispute, with conflicting accounts having him dying either before age 30 or by age 48.<ref name=stanford/>


Gabirol lived a life of material comfort, never having to work to sustain himself, but he lived a difficult and love-less life, suffering ill-health, misfortunes, fickle friendships, and powerful enemies.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xvii—xxvi}} Gabirol's writings indicate that his father was a prominent figure in [[Cordova]], but was forced to relocate to Malaga during a political crisis in 1013 CE.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xvii}} Gabirol's parents died while he was a child, leaving him an orphan with no siblings or close relatives.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xviii}} He was befriended, supported and protected by a prominent political figure of the time, Jekuthiel Hassan, and moved to [[Saragossa]], then an important center of Jewish culture.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xviii}} Gabirol's temperament, occassionally boastful poetry, and sharp wit earned him powerful enemies, but as long as Jekuthiel lived, Gabirol remained safe from them. However, when Gabirol was seventeen years old, his benefactor was [[assassination|assassinated]] as the result of a political conspiracy, and by 1045 Gabirol found himself compelled to leave Saragossa.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxiv}} He was then sponsored by no less than the grand vizier and top general to the kings of [[Granada]], [[Samuel ibn Naghrillah|Shmuel HaNaggid]].<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}} It seems Gabirol never married.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxvi}}
Gabirol lived a life of material comfort, never having to work to sustain himself, but he lived a difficult and loveless life, suffering ill health, misfortunes, fickle friendships, and powerful enemies.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xvii—xxvi}} From his teenage years, he suffered from some disease, possibly [[lupus vulgaris]],<ref name=loewe/> that would leave him embittered and in constant pain.<ref name=pen/> He indicates in his poems that he considered himself short and ugly.<ref name=pen/> Of his personality, [[Moses ibn Ezra]] wrote: "his irascible temperament dominated his intellect, nor could he rein the demon that was within himself. It came easily to him to lampoon the great, with salvo upon salvo of mockery and sarcasm."<ref name=loewe/>{{rp|17–18}} He has been described summarily as "a social misfit."<ref name=wine/>{{rp|12}}


Gabirol's writings indicate that his father was a prominent figure in [[Córdoba, Andalusia|Córdoba]], but was forced to relocate to Málaga during a political crisis in 1013.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xvii}} Gabirol's parents died while he was a child, leaving him an orphan with no siblings or close relatives.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xviii}} He was befriended, supported and protected by a prominent political figure of the time, Yekutiel ibn Hassan al-Mutawakkil ibn Qabrun,<ref name=pen/> and moved to [[Zaragoza]], then an important center of Jewish culture.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xviii}} Gabirol's anti-social<ref name=stanford/> temperament, occasionally boastful poetry, and sharp wit earned him powerful enemies, but as long as Jekuthiel lived, Gabirol remained safe from them<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxiv}} and was able to freely immerse himself in study of the Talmud, grammar, geometry, astronomy, and philosophy.<ref name=chabad/> However, when Gabirol was seventeen years old, his benefactor was [[assassination|assassinated]] as the result of a political conspiracy, and by 1045 Gabirol found himself compelled to leave Zaragoza.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxiv}}<ref name=chabad/> He was then sponsored by no less than the grand vizier and top general to the kings of [[Granada]], [[Samuel ibn Naghrillah]] (Shmuel HaNaggid).<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}} Gabirol made ibn Naghrillah an object of praise in his poetry until an estrangement arose between them and ibn Naghrillah became the butt of Gabirol's bitterest irony. It seems Gabirol never married,<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxvi}} and that he spent the remainder of his life wandering.<ref name=je1906/>
A legend concerning the manner of Gabirol's death<ref name=yahya/> relates that he was murdered by a Muslim poet who jealous of Gabirol's poetic gifts, and who secretly buried him beneath the roots of a fig tree. The tree bore fruit abundantly; and the fruit was of extraordinary sweetness. This strange circumstance excited attention; a search was instituted, the remains of the murdered Gabirol were brought to light, and the murderer expiated his crime with his life.


Gabirol had become an accomplished poet and philosopher at an early age:
==Issues of historical identity==
* By age 17, he had composed five of his known poems, one an [[Azharot|azhara]] ("I am the master, and Song is my slave"<ref name=chabad/>) enumerating all [[613 commandments]] of [[Judaism]].<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xix}}
Though Gabirol's legacy was esteemed throughout the Middle ages and Renaissance periods, it was historically minimized by two errors of scholarship that mis-attributed his works.
* At age 17, he composed a 200-verse elegy for his friend Yekutiel<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xiv}} and four other notable elegies to mourn the death of [[Hai Gaon]].<ref name=chabad/>
* By age 19, he had composed a 400-verse alphabetical and acrostic poem teaching the rules of Hebrew grammar.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}}
* By age 23<ref name=chabad/> or 25,<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}}<ref name=pen/> he had composed, in Arabic, "Improvement of the Moral Qualities" ({{lang-ar|كتاب إصلاح الأخلاق}}, translated into Hebrew by [[Judah ben Saul ibn Tibbon]] as {{lang-he|תקון מדות הנפש}}<ref name=chabad/>
* At around age 25,<ref name=chabad/> or not,<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}} he may have composed his collection of proverbs ''Mivchar Pninim'' (lit. "Choice of Pearls"), although scholars are divided on his authorship.<ref name=stanford/>
* At around age 28,<ref name=chabad/> or not,<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}} he composed his philosophical work ''[[Solomon ibn Gabirol#Fons Vitæ|Fons Vitæ]]''.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}}

As mentioned above, the conflicting accounts of Gabirol's death have him dying either before age 30 or by age 48.<ref name=stanford/> The opinion of earliest death, that he died before age 30, is believed to be based upon a misreading of medieval sources.<ref name=je1906/> The remaining two opinions are that he died either in 1069 or 1070,<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxvii}} or around 1058 in [[Valencia]].<ref name=je1906/><ref name=sirat/> As to the circumstances of his death, one legend claims that he was trampled to death by an Arab horseman.<ref name=chabad/> A second legend<ref name=yahya/> relates that he was murdered by a Muslim poet who was jealous of Gabirol's poetic gifts, and who secretly buried him beneath the roots of a fig tree. The tree bore fruit in abundant quantity and of extraordinary sweetness. Its uniqueness excited attention and provoked an investigation. The resulting inspection of the tree uncovered Gabirol's remains, and led to the identification and execution of the murderer.

==Historical identity==
Though Gabirol's legacy was esteemed throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance periods, it was historically minimized by two errors of scholarship that mis-attributed his works.


===False ascription as King Solomon===
===False ascription as King Solomon===
Gabirol seems to have often been called "the Malagan", after his place of birth, and would occasionally so refer to himself when encrypting his signature in his poems (eg. in "שטר עלי בעדים" he embeds his signature as an acrostic, in the form "אני שלמה הקטן ברבי יהודה גבירול מאלקי חזק"). While in modern Hebrew that city is also called Malaga ({{lang-he|מאלגה}}), that is in deference to its current, Spanish, pronunciation. In Gabirol's day, when this city was ruled by Arabic-speakers, the city was called Malaqa ({{lang-ar|مالقة}}), as it is to this day by Arabic-speakers (see, the Arabic Wikipedia page for [[:ar:مالقة|Malaga]]). The twelfth century Arabic philosopher Abu Aflah ([[Jabir ibn Aflah]] ?) misinterpreted "שלמה ... יהודה ... אלמלאק" to mean "Solomon ... the Jew .. the king", and so ascribed to the biblical [[King Solomon]] some seventeen philosophical essays of Gaibrol. In the fifteenth century, the Jewish philosopher [[Yohanan Alemanno]] imported that error back into the Hebrew canon, and added another four works to the list of false ascriptions. <ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxx}}
Gabirol seems to have often been called "the Málagan", after his place of birth, and would occasionally so refer to himself when encrypting his signature in his poems (e.g. in "שטר עלי בעדים", he embeds his signature as an [[acrostic]] in the form "אני שלמה הקטן ברבי יהודה גבירול מאלקי חזק" – meaning: "I am young Solomon, son of Rabi Yehuda, from Malaqa, Hazak"). While in [[Modern Hebrew]] the city is also called Málaga ({{lang-he|מאלגה}}), that is in deference to its current [[Spanish language|Spanish]] pronunciation. In Gabirol's day, when it was ruled by Arabic speakers, it was called ''Mālaqa'' ({{lang-ar|مالقة}}), as it is to this day by Arabic speakers. The 12th-century Arab philosopher [[Jabir ibn Aflah]] misinterpreted manuscript signatures of the form "שלמה ... יהודה ... אלמלאק" to mean "Solomon ... the Jew .. the king", and so ascribed to [[Solomon]] some seventeen philosophical essays of Gabirol. The 15th-century Jewish philosopher [[Yohanan Alemanno]] imported that error back into the Hebrew canon, and added another four works to the list of false ascriptions.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxx}}

===Identification as Avicebron===
In 1846, [[Solomon Munk]] discovered among the [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] manuscripts in the [[Bibliothèque Nationale|French National Library]] in [[Paris]] a work by [[Shem-Tov ibn Falaquera]]. Comparing it with a [[Medieval Latin|Latin]] work by Avicebron entitled ''[[Solomon ibn Gabirol#Fons Vitæ|Fons Vitæ]]'', Munk proved them to both excerpt an [[Arabic]] original of which the ''Fons Vitæ'' was evidently the translation. Munk concluded that Avicebron or Avencebrol, who had for centuries been believed to be a Christian<ref name=pen/> or Arabic Muslim philosopher,<ref name=eb9/> was instead identical with the Jewish Solomon ibn Gabirol.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxxi-xxxii}}<ref name=pen/><ref name=Orient/> The centuries-long confusion was in part due to a content feature atypical in Jewish writings: ''Fons Vitæ'' exhibits an independence of Jewish religious dogma and does not cite Biblical verses or Rabbinic sources.<ref name=je1906/>

The progression in the Latinization of Gabirol's name seems to have been ibn Gabirol, Ibngebirol, Avengebirol. Avengebrol, Avencebrol, Avicebrol, and finally Avicebron.<ref name=je1906/> Some sources still refer to him as Avicembron, Avicenbrol, or Avencebrol.<ref name=stanford/>

==Philosophy==
{{Jewish philosophy|expanded=Medieval}}
Gabirol, in his poem "כשרש עץ" (line 24), claims to have written twenty philosophical works. Through scholarly deduction (see [[Solomon ibn Gabirol#False ascription as King Solomon|above]]), we know their titles, but we have the texts of only two.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxxi}}

Gabirol made his mark on the history of philosophy under his alias as Avicebron, one of the first teachers of Neo-Platonism in [[Europe]], and author of ''[[Solomon ibn Gabirol#Fons Vitæ|Fons Vitæ]]'' .<ref name=je1906/><ref name=Oesterley/> As such, he is best known for the doctrine that all things, including soul and intellect, are composed of matter and form (“Universal [[Hylomorphism]]”), and for his emphasis on divine will.<ref name=stanford/>

His role has been compared to that of [[Philo]]:<ref name=je1906/> both were ignored by their fellow Jews, but exercised considerable influence upon Gentiles (Philo upon primitive Christianity, Gabirol upon medieval Christian scholasticism); and both served as cultural intermediaries (Philo between [[Hellenistic philosophy]] and the Oriental world; Gabirol between Greco-Arabic philosophy and the Occident).


===Identity with Avicebron===
===''Fons Vitæ''===
''Fons Vitæ'', originally written in Arabic under the title ''Yanbu' al-Hayat'' ({{lang-ar|ينبوع الحياة}}) and later translated into Hebrew by Ibn Tibbon as {{lang-he|מקור חיים}}, {{IPA-he|mɛ.ˈkor xay.ˈyim|pron}}, lit. "Source of Life", (cf. {{bibleverse-lb||Psalms|36:10|HE}}) is a Neo-Platonic philosophical dialogue between master and disciple on the nature of Creation and how understanding what we are (our nature) can help us know how to live (our purpose).<ref name=stanford/> "His goal is to understand the nature of being and human being so that he might better understand and better inspire the pursuit of knowledge and the doing of good deeds."<ref name=stanford/> The work stands out in the history of philosophy for introducing the doctrine that all things, including soul and intellect, are composed of matter and form, and for its emphasis on divine will.<ref name=stanford/>
In 1846, [[Solomon Munk]] discovered among the [[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] manuscripts in the [[Bibliothèque Nationale|French National Liberary]] in [[Paris]] a work by [[Shem-Tov ibn Falaquera]]. Comparing it with a [[Medieval Latin|Latin]] work by Avicebron entitled the ''Fons Vitæ'' (see section below), Munk proved them to both excerpt an [[Arabic]] original of which the ''Fons Vitæ'' was evidently the translation. Munk concluded that Avicebron or '''Avencebrol''', who had for centuries been believed to be an Arabic Muslim philosopher,<ref name=eb9/> was instead identical with the Jewish Solomon ibn Gabirol.<ref name=Orient/><ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxxi-xxxii}}


::Student: What is the purpose of man?
==Restorer of Neoplatonism==
::Teacher: The inclination of his soul to the higher world in order that everyone might return to his like.
A consequence of Gabirol being identified as Avicebron was that he became identified as one of the first teachers of [[Neoplatonism]] in [[Europe]].<ref name=Oesterley/> His role has been compared to that of [[Philo]]: While Philo had served as the intermediary between Hellenic philosophy and the Oriental world, Gabirol Occidentalized Greco-Arabic philosophy and restored it to Europe a thousand years later.
::(''Fons'' ''Vitæ'' 1.2, p. 4, lines 23–25)<ref name=stanford/>


In the closing sentences of the Fons ''Vitæ'' (5.43, p.&nbsp;338, line 21), ibn Gabirol further describes this state of “return” as a liberation from death and a cleaving to the source of life.<ref name=stanford/>
==''Fons Vitæ''==
''Fons Vitæ'' ({{lang-he|מקור חיים}} {{IPA-he|mɛ.ˈkor xay.ˈyim|pron}}, lit. "Source of Life", cf. {{bibleverse-lb||psalms|36:10|HE}}) is a Neo-Platonic philosophical dialogue between master and disciple on the nature of Creation. It posits that the basis of existence and the source of life in every created thing is a combination of "matter" ({{lang-la|materia universalis}}) and "form". The doctrine of matter and form informed the work's sub-title: "''De Materia et Forma.''"<ref>The manuscript in the Mazarine Library is entitled "''De Materia Universali''"</ref>


The work was originally composed in Arabic, of which no copies are extant. It was preserved for the ages by a translation into Latin in the year 1150 by [[Abraham ibn Daud]] and [[Dominicus Gundissalinus]], who was the first official director of the [[Toledo School of Translators]], a [[Scholasticism|scholastic]] [[philosopher]], and the [[archdeacon]] of [[Segovia, Spain]].<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxx}}. At some point the Latin text was translated into Hebrew.
The work was originally composed in Arabic, of which no copies are extant. It was preserved for the ages by a translation into Latin in the year 1150 by [[Abraham ibn Daud]] and [[Dominicus Gundissalinus]], who was the first official director of the [[Toledo School of Translators]], a [[Scholasticism|scholastic]] [[philosopher]], and the [[archdeacon]] of [[Segovia, Spain]].<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxx}} In the 13th century, Shem Tov ibn Falaquera wrote a summary of ''Fons'' ''Vitæ'' in Hebrew,<ref name=stanford/> and only in 1926 was the full Latin text translated into Hebrew.<ref name=chabad/>


''Fons Vitæ'' consists of five sections:{{cn|date=October 2015}}
''Fons Vitæ'' consists of five sections:<ref name=je1906/>
# matter and form in general and their relation in physical substances ({{lang-la|substantiæ corporeæ sive compositæ}});
# matter and form in general and their relation in physical substances ({{lang-la|substantiæ corporeæ sive compositæ}});
# the substance which underlies the corporeality of the world ({{lang-la|de substantia quæ sustinet corporeitatem mundi}});
# the substance which underlies the corporeality of the world ({{lang-la|de substantia quæ sustinet corporeitatem mundi}});
# proofs of the existence of intermediaries between God and the physical world ({{lang-la|substantiæ simplices}}, lit. "intelligibiles");
# proofs of the existence of intermediaries between God and the physical world ({{lang-la|substantiæ simplices}}, lit. "intelligibiles");
# proofs that these "intelligibiles", are likewise constituted of matter and form;
# proofs that these "intelligibiles" are likewise constituted of matter and form;
# universal matter and universal form.
# universal matter and universal form.


''Fons Vitæ'' posits that the basis of existence and the source of life in every created thing is a combination of "matter" ({{lang-la|materia universalis}}) and "form". The doctrine of matter and form informed the work's subtitle: "''De Materia et Forma.''"<ref>The manuscript in the Mazarine Library is entitled "''De Materia Universali''"</ref> Its chief doctrines are:<ref name=je1906/>
The chief doctrines of the ''Fons Vitæ'':{{cn|date=October 2015}}
# everything that exists may be reduced to three categories:
# everything that exists may be reduced to three categories:
## God;
## God;
## matter and form (ie. Creation);
## matter and form (i.e. Creation);
## will (an intermediary).
## will (an intermediary).
# All created beings are constituted of form and matter.
# All created beings are constituted of form and matter.
# This holds true for both the physical world ({{lang-la|substantiis corporeis sive compositis}}) and the spiritual world ({{lang-la|substantiis spiritualibus sive simplicibus}}), which latter are the connecting link between the first substance (ie. the Godhead, {{lang-la|essentia prima}}) and the physical world ({{lang-la|substantia, quæ sustinet novem prædicamenta}}, lit. "substance divided into nine categories").
# This holds true for both the physical world ({{lang-la|substantiis corporeis sive compositis}}) and the spiritual world ({{lang-la|substantiis spiritualibus sive simplicibus}}), which latter are the connecting link between the first substance (i.e. the Godhead, {{lang-la|essentia prima}}) and the physical world ({{lang-la|substantia, quæ sustinet novem prædicamenta}}, lit. "substance divided into nine categories").
# Matter and form are always and everywhere in the relation of "''sustinens''" and "''sustentatum''", "''propriatum''" and "''proprietas''", substratum and property or attribute.
# Matter and form are always and everywhere in the relation of "''sustinens''" and "''sustentatum''", "''propriatum''" and "''proprietas''": substratum and property or attribute.


===Influence within Judaism===
==Reconciling Neoplatonism with Jewish theology==
{{refimprove section|date=October 2015}}
It is held by some scholars that Ibn Gabirol set out to reconcile [[Neoplatonism]] with Jewish theology. Geiger{{cn|October 2015}} finds complete harmony between Gabirol's conception of the Deity and the historical Jewish conception of God; and Guttmann and Eisler{{cn|October 2015}} hold that in Gabirol's doctrine of the will there is a departure from the pantheistic emanation doctrine of Neoplatonism and an attempted approach to the Biblical doctrine of creation.


Though Gabirol as a philosopher was ignored by the Jewish community, Gabirol as a poet was not, and through his poetry, he introduced his philosophical ideas.<ref name=eb9/> His best-known poem, [[:s:Royal Crown|''Keter Malkut'' ("Royal Crown")]], is a philosophical treatise in poetical form, the "double" of the ''Fons Vitæ''. For example, the eighty-third line of the poem points to one of the teachings of the ''Fons Vitæ''; namely, that all the attributes predicated of God exist apart in thought alone and not in reality.<ref name=je1906/>
A suggestion of Judaic [[monotheism]] is found in Gabirol's doctrine of the oneness of the "materia universalis." The Neoplatonic doctrine that the Godhead is unknowable naturally appealed to Jewish rationalists, who, while positing the existence of God, studiously refrained from ascribing definite qualities or positive attributes to God.


[[Moses ibn Ezra]] is the first to mention Gabirol as a philosopher, praising his intellectual achievements, and quoting several passages from the ''Fons Vitæ'' in his own work, ''Aruggat ha-Bosem''.<ref name=je1906/> [[Abraham ibn Ezra]], who cites Gabirol's philosophico-allegorical Bible interpretation, borrows from the ''Fons Vitæ'' both in his prose and in his poetry without giving due credit.<ref name=je1906/>
Ibn Gabirol strived to keep "his philosophical speculation free from every theological admixture." In this respect Gabirol is unique. The "Fons Vitæ" shows an independence of Jewish religious dogma; not a verse of the Bible nor a line from the Rabbis is cited. For this reason Gabirol exercised comparatively little influence upon his Jewish successors, and was accepted by the scholastics as a non-Jew, as an Arab or a Christian. The suspicion of heresy which once clung to him prevented Ibn Gabirol from exercising a great influence upon Jewish thought. His theory of emanation was held by many to be irreconcilable with the Jewish doctrine of creation; and the tide of [[Aristotelianism]] turned back the slight current of Gabirol's Neoplatonism.


The 12th-century philosopher [[Joseph ibn Tzaddik]] borrows extensively from the "Fons Vitæ" in his work ''Microcosmos''.<ref name=je1906/>
==Effect upon his successors==
[[Moses ibn Ezra]] is the first to mention Gabirol as a philosopher. He speaks of Gabirol's character and attainments in terms of highest praise, and in his "'Aruggat ha-Bosem" quotes several passages from the "Fons Vitæ." [[Abraham ibn Ezra]], who gives several specimens of Gabirol's philosophico-allegorical Bible interpretation, borrows from the "Fons Vitæ" both in his prose and in his poetry without giving due credit.


[[Abraham ibn Daud]] of [[Toledo, Spain|Toledo]], in the twelfth century, was the first to take exception to Gabirol's teachings. In the "Sefer ha-Kabbalah" he refers to Gabirol as a poet in complimentary phrase. But in order to counteract the influence of Ibn Gabirol the philosopher, he wrote an Arabic book, translated into Hebrew under the title "Emunah Ramah", in which he reproaches Gabirol with having philosophized without any regard to the requirements of the Jewish religious position, and bitterly accuses him of mistaking a number of poor reasons for one good one.
Another 12th-century philosopher, [[Abraham ibn Daud]] of [[Toledo, Spain|Toledo]], was the first to take exception to Gabirol's teachings. In ''Sefer ha-Kabbalah'' he praises Gabirol as a poet. But to counteract the influence of ibn Gabirol the philosopher, he wrote an Arabic book, translated into Hebrew under the title ''Emunah Ramah'', in which he reproaches Gabirol for having philosophized without any regard to the requirements of the Jewish religious position and bitterly accuses him of mistaking a number of poor reasons for one good one.<ref name=je1906/> He criticizes Gabirol for being repetitive, wrong-headed and unconvincing.<ref name=stanford/>


Occasional traces of ibn Gabriol's thought are found in some of the [[Kabbalah|Kabbalistic]] literature of the 13th century. Later references to ibn Gabirol, such as those of [[Elijah ben Joseph Chabillo|Elijah Chabillo]], [[Isaac Abravanel|Isaac Abarbanel]], [[Abravanel|Judah Abarbanel]], [[Moses Almosnino]], and [[Joseph Solomon Delmedigo]], are based on an acquaintance with the scholastic philosophy, especially the works of [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]].<ref name=je1906/>
[[Shem Tov ibn Falaquera]] wrote a summary of ''Fons Vitæ'' in Hebrew.


The 13th-century Jewish philosopher [[Berechiah ha-Nakdan]] drew upon Gabirol's works in his encyclopedic philosophical text ''Sefer Haḥibbur'' ({{lang-he|ספר החיבור}}, {{IPA-he|ˈsefeʁ haχiˈbuʁ|pron}}, lit. "The Book of Compilation").
Occasional traces of Ibn Gabriol's thought are found in some of the [[Kabbalah|Kabbalistic]] literature of the thirteenth century. Later references to Ibn Gabirol, such as those of Eli Ḥabillo, Isaac Abarbanel, Judah Abarbanel, Moses Almosnino, and Joseph Solomon Delmedigo, are based upon an acquaintance with the scholastic philosophy, especially the works of [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]].


===Influence on Scholasticism===
Though Gabirol as a philosopher was not widely studied by the Jewish community, Gabirol as a poet kept alive the remembrance of the ideas of the philosopher;<ref name=eb9/> for his best-known poem, [[:s:Royal Crown|''Keter Malkut'' ("Royal Crown")]], is a philosophical treatise in poetical form, the "double" of the ''Fons Vitæ''. Thus the eighty-third line of the poem points to one of the teachings of the "Fons Vitæ"; viz., that all the attributes predicated of God exist apart in thought alone and not in reality.


For over six centuries, the Christian world regarded ''Fons Vitæ'' as the work of a Christian philosopher<ref name=pen/> or Arabic Muslim philosopher,<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxxi-xxxii}}<ref name=eb9/><ref name=pen/><ref name=Orient/> and it became a cornerstone and bone of contention in many theologically charged debates between Franciscans and Dominicans.<ref name=stanford/><ref name=je1906/> The [[Aristotelianism|Aristotelian]] [[Dominican Order|Dominicans]] led by [[St. Albertus Magnus]] and [[St. Thomas Aquinas]] opposed the teachings of ''Fons Vitæ''; the Platonist [[Franciscan]]s led by [[Duns Scotus]] supported its teachings, and led to its acceptance in Christian philosophy, influencing later philosophers such as the 16th-century [[Dominican Order|Dominican]] [[friar]] [[Giordano Bruno]].<ref name=je1906/> Other early supporters of Gabirol's philosophy include the following:<ref name=je1906/>
[[Berachyah]], a Jewish philosopher, drew upon Gabirol's works in his encyclopedic philosophical text ''Sefer Hahibbur'' (The Book of Compilation).


* [[Dominicus Gundissalinus]], who translated the ''Fons Vitæ'' into Latin and incorporated its ideas into his own teaching.
==Influence on Scholasticism==
* [[William of Auvergne, Bishop of Paris|William of Auvergne]], who refers to the work of Gabirol under the title ''Fons Sapientiæ''. He speaks of Gabirol as a Christian and praises him as "''unicus omnium philosophantium nobilissimus''."
Abundant compensation awaited Ibn Gabirol in the treatment accorded to his ''Fons Vitae'' by the Christian world. Regarded as the work of a Christian philosopher, it became a bone of contention between the Platonist Franciscans led by [[Duns Scotus]], who supported Gabirol, and the Aristotelian [[Dominican Order|Dominicans]] led by [[St. Albertus Magnus]] and [[St. Thomas Aquinas]].
* [[Alexander of Hales]] and his disciple [[Bonaventure|Bonaventura]], who accept the teaching of Gabirol that spiritual substances consist of matter and form.
* William of Lamarre


The main points at issue between Gabirol and Aquinas were as follows:<ref name=je1906/>
A sign of influence by Ibn Gabirol is found in the works of [[Dominicus Gundisallimus]], who not merely translated the ''Fons vitæ'' into Latin, but incorporated the ideas of Gabirol into his own teaching. [[William of Auvergne, Bishop of Paris|William of Auvergne]] refers to the work of Gabirol under the title "Fons Sapientiæ." He speaks of Gabirol as a Christian, and praises him as "unicus omnium philosophantium nobilissimus." [[Alexander of Hales]] and his disciple [[Bonaventure|Bonaventura]] accept the teaching of Gabirol that spiritual substances consist of matter and form. William of Lamarre is likewise a defender of Gabirolean doctrine.
# the universality of matter, Aquinas holding that spiritual substances are immaterial;
# the plurality of forms in a physical entity, which Aquinas denied;
# the power of activity of physical beings, which Gabirol affirmed. Aquinas held that Gabirol made the mistake of transferring to real existence the theoretical combination of genus and species, and that he thus came to the erroneous conclusion that in reality all things are constituted of matter and form as genus and species respectively.


=== Ex nihilo ===
The most zealous of the champions of Gabirol's theory of the universality of matter is Duns Scotus, through whose influence the basal thought of the ''Fons Vitæ'', the materiality of spiritual substances, was perpetuated in Christian philosophy, influencing later philosophers even down to [[Giordano Bruno]], who refers to "the Moor, Avicebron."
Gabirol denied the idea of "creation ''[[Creatio ex nihilo|ex nihilo]]''[[Creatio ex nihilo|"]] because he felt that that idea would make [[God in Judaism|God]] "subject to the [laws of existence]".<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Armstrong |first=Karen |title=A History of God: The 4000-year Quest of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam |publisher=[[Alfred A. Knopf Inc]] |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-679-42600-4 |location=New York |pages=186 |author-link=Karen Armstrong}}</ref>


==Ethics==
The main points at issue between Gabirol and Aquinas were three: (1) the universality of matter, Aquinas holding that spiritual substances are immaterial; (2) the plurality of forms in a physical entity, which Aquinas denied; and (3) the power of activity of physical beings, which Gabirol affirmed. Aquinas held that Gabirol made the mistake of transferring to real existence the theoretical combination of genus and species, and that he thus came to the erroneous conclusion that in reality all things are constituted of matter and form as genus and species respectively.


===''The Improvement of the Moral Qualities''===
==Ethical treatise==
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right"
''The Improvement of the Moral Qualities'' is an ethical treatise which has been called by Munk "a popular manual of morals." It was composed by Gabirol at Zaragoza in 1045, at the request of some friends who wished to possess a book treating of the qualities of man and the methods of effecting their improvement. In two respects the "Ethics" (by which abbreviation the work may be cited) is highly original.
|-
| '''Sight'''
| '''Hearing'''


|-
Gabirol set out to systematize the principles of [[ethics]] independently of religious dogma. His treatise is original in its emphasis on the physio-psychological aspect of ethics, Gabirol's fundamental thesis being the correlation and interdependence of the physical and the psychical in respect of ethical conduct.
| <poem>Pride
Meekness
Pudency
Impudence</poem>
| <poem>Love
Hate
Mercy
Hard-heartedness (cruelty)</poem>


|-
Gabirol's theses may be summed up as follows: The qualities of the soul are made manifest through the senses; and these senses in turn are constituted of the four humors. Even as the humors may be modified one by the other, so can the senses be controlled and the qualities of the soul be trained unto good or evil. Though Gabirol attributes the virtues to the senses, he would have It distinctly understood that he treats only of the five physical senses, not of the "concealed" senses, such as perception and understanding, which partake of the nature of the soul. In order to cultivate his soul, man must necessarily know its peculiarities, study himself as he is, closely examine his character and inclination, habituate himself to the abandonment of whatever is mean, i.e., whatsoever draws him into close contact with the physical and temporal, and aim at the spiritual and the abiding. This effort in itself is blessedness. A man's ability to make such an effort is proof of divine benevolence.
| '''Smell'''
| '''Taste'''


|-
Next follows the most original feature of Gabirol's ethical system, the arrangement of the virtues and vices in relation to the senses: every sense becoming the instrument, not the agent, of two virtues and two corresponding vices.
| <poem>Wrath
Good-will (suavity)
Jealousy
Wide-awakeness</poem>
| <poem>Joy (cheerfulness)
Grief (apprehensiveness)
Tranquillity
Penitence (remorse)</poem>


|-
==Literary activity==
| colspan=2 style="padding-left:35%;" | '''Touch'''
{{Expand section|date=October 2015}}
|-
Gabirol published biblical exegesis, philosophy, ethics, poetry,<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxvii}} and satire.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}}
| colspan=2 style="padding-left:35%;" | <poem>Liberality
Miserliness
Valor
Cowardice</poem>
|}


''The Improvement of the Moral Qualities'', originally written in Arabic under the title Islah al-Khlaq ({{lang-ar|إصلاح الأخلاق}}), and later translated by Ibn Tibbon as ({{lang-he|"תקון מדות הנפש"}}, {{IPA-he|ti.'kun mi.ˈdot ha.ˈne.feʃ|pron}}) is an ethical treatise that has been called by Munk "a popular manual of morals."<ref name=je1906 />{{rp|at=Ethical Treatise}} It was composed by Gabirol at Zaragoza in 1045, at the request of some friends who wished to possess a book treating of the qualities of man and the methods of effecting their improvement.<ref name=je1906/>
===Poetry===
Gabirol wrote both sacred and secular poems in Hebrew, the most famous of which is ''Keter Malkuth'' (The Royal Crown), mentioned above, a devotional poem of over 900 lines surveying the cosmos, as far as it was understood to 11th Century science, as a witness to God's creation. This and other of the sacred poems remain in liturgical use today. The secular poems show a disillusionment with social mores and worldliness, but expressed with a sophistication and artistry that reveals the influence of Gabirol's Arabic contemporaries.


The innovations in the work are that it presents the principles of [[ethics]] independently of religious dogma and that it proposes that the five physical senses are emblems and instruments of virtue and vice, but not their agents; thus, a person's inclination to vice is subject to a person's will to change.<ref name=je1906/> Gabirol presents a tabular diagram of the relationship of twenty qualities to the five senses, reconstructed at right,<ref name=je1906/> and urges his readers to train the qualities of their souls unto good through self-understanding and habituation. He regards man's ability to do so as an example of divine benevolence.<ref name=je1906/>
Gabirol was recognized even by his critics (e.g. [[Moses Ibn Ezra]] and [[Yehuda Alharizi]]) as the greatest poet of his age.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxii}} He had become an accomplished poet at an early age:
* By age seventeen, he had composed five of his known poems, one an [[Azharot|azhara]], enumerating all [[613 commandments|613 biblical commandments]].<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xix}}
* By age nineteen, he had composed a 400 verse poem teaching the rules of Hebrew grammar.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}}
* In the year 1045, he composed, in Arabic, "Improvement of the Moral Qualities" ("כתאב אצלאח אלאכלאק", {{lang-he|תקון פדות הפש}})<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}}


While this work of Gabirol is not widely studied in Judaism, it has many points in common with [[Bahya ibn Paquda]]'s very popular{{Citation needed|date=March 2016}} work ''[[Chovot HaLevavot]]'',<ref name=je1906/> written in 1040, also in Zaragoza.
We do not know when he composed his collection of proverbs "The Choice of Pearls" or his philosophical work "The Source of Life".<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxv}}


===''Mivchar HaPeninim''===
Gabirol composed an elegy of more than 200 verses for jekuthiel.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xiv}} The death of [[Hai Gaon]] also called forth a similar poem. When barely twenty, Gabirol wrote ''Anaḳ'', a versified Hebrew grammar, alphabetical and acrostic, consisting of 400 verses divided into ten parts. Of this grammar, ninety-five lines have been preserved by [[Solomon Parḥon]]. In these Gabirol reproaches his townsmen with their neglect of the [[Hebrew language]]. ''[[Mivhar HaPeninim]]'' ("The Choice of Pearls"), an ethical work comprising sixty-four chapters, has been attributed to Gabirol since the 19th century, but this is doubtful.<ref name=je-ibngabirol/>
[[File:Mivhar-Peninim-1899-London-HB37435.pdf|thumb|right|''Mivhar ha-Peninim'', traditionally thought to have been written by Solomon ibn Gabirol,<ref name=stanford/> 1899 edition with corrected text and a facing English translation.<ref name=hb37435/>]]


''Mukhtar al-Jawahir'' ({{lang-ar|مختار الجواهر}}), ''[[Mivhar HaPeninim|Mivchar HaPeninim]]'' ({{lang-he|מבחר הפנינים}}. lit. "The Choice of Pearls"), an ethics work of sixty-four chapters, has been attributed to Gabirol since the 19th century, but this is doubtful.<ref name=je-ibngabirol/> It was originally published, along with a short commentary, in Soncino, Italy, in 1484, and has since been re-worked and re-published in many forms and abridged editions (e.g. [[Joseph Ḳimcḥi]] versified the work under the title "''Shekel ha-Kodesh''").<ref name=je1906/>
==Philosophy==

Gabirol, in his poem "כשרש עץ" (line 24) claims to have written twenty philosophical works. Through scholarly deduction (see [[Solomon ibn Gabirol#False ascription as King Solomon|above]]), we know their titles, but we only have the texts of two.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxxi}}
The work is a collection of maxims, proverbs, and moral reflections, many of them of Arabic origin, and bears a strong similarity to the [[Florilegium]] of [[Hunayn ibn Ishaq]] and other Arabic and Hebrew collections of ethics sayings, which were highly prized by both Arabs and Jews.<ref name=je1906/>

==Poetry==
Gabirol wrote both sacred and secular poems, in Hebrew, and was recognized even by his critics (e.g. [[Moses Ibn Ezra|Moses ibn Ezra]] and [[Yehuda Alharizi]]) as the greatest poet of his age.<ref name=davidson/>{{rp|xxii}} His secular poems express disillusionment with social mores and worldliness, but are written with a sophistication and artistry that reveals him to have been socially influenced by his worldly Arabic contemporaries.<ref name=wine/>

Gabirol's lasting poetic legacy, however, was his sacred works. Today, "his religious lyrics are considered by many to be the most powerful of their kind in the medieval Hebrew tradition, and his long cosmological masterpiece, ''Keter Malchut'', is acknowledged today as one of the greatest poems in all of Hebrew literature."<ref name=pen/> His verses are distinctive for tackling complex metaphysical concepts, expressing scathing satire, and declaring his religious devotion unabashedly.<ref name=pen/>

Gabirol wrote with a pure Biblical Hebrew diction that would become the signature style of the Spanish school of Hebrew poets,<ref name=je1906/> and he popularized in Hebrew poetry the strict Arabic meter introduced by [[Dunash ben Labrat]]. [[Abraham Ibn Ezra|Abraham ibn Ezra]]<ref>Commentary on Gen. 3: 1</ref> calls Gabirol, not ben Labrat, "the writer of metric songs," and in ''Sefer Zaḥot'' uses Gabirol's poems to illustrate various poetic meters.<ref name=je1906/>

He wrote also more than one hundred [[Piyyut|piyyuṭim]] and [[selichot]] for the [[Shabbat|Sabbath]], [[Jewish holidays|festivals]], and [[Ta'anit|fast-days]], most of which have been included in the [[Machzor|Holy Day prayer books]] of [[Sephardi Jews|Sephardim]], [[Ashkenazi Jews|Ashkenazim]], and even [[Karaite Judaism|Karaites]]<ref name=je1906/> Some of his most famous in liturgical use include the following:<ref name=chabad/>
* ''Azharot''
* ''Keter Malchuth'' (lit. Royal Crown), for recitation on [[Yom Kippur]]<ref name=stanford/>
* various dirges (''[[kinnot]]'') mourning the destruction of the [[Temple in Jerusalem]] and the plight of Israel

Gabirol's most famous poem is ''Keter Malchut'' (lit. Royal Crown), which, in 900 lines, describes the cosmos as testifying to its own creation by God, based upon the then current (11th-century) scientific understanding of the cosmos.

Some popular examples that are often sung outside of the liturgy include: Shalom L'ben Dodi,<ref>{{Cite web |title=ArtScroll.com - The ArtScroll Sephardic Siddur - Schottenstein Edition |url=https://www.artscroll.com/Books/9781422623190.html |access-date=2024-01-14 |website=www.artscroll.com}}</ref> Shachar Abakeshcha.{{Citation needed|date=January 2024}}{{Examples needed|date=January 2024}}

Gabirol's poetry has been set to music by the modern composer [[Aaron Jay Kernis]], in an album titled "Symphony of Meditations."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/art/kernis-takes-on-ibn-gabirol-in-meditations/|title=Kernis Takes On Ibn Gabirol in 'Meditations'|website=[[PBS]] |date=July 2009 }}</ref>

In 2007 Gabirol's poetry has been set to music by the Israeli [[Rock music|rock]] [[guitar]]ist [[Berry Sakharof]] and the Israeli modern composer [[Rea Mochiach]], in a piece titled "Red Lips" ("Adumey Ha-Sefatot" "אֲדֻמֵּי הַשְּׂפָתוֹת") <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.discogs.com/artist/227700|title=Berry Sakharof discography|website=[[Discogs]] }}</ref>

==Editions and translations==
* {{cite book|last=אבן גבירול שלמה ב"ר יהודה הספרדי|editor-last2=רבניצקי|editor-first2=ח.|editor-link2=Yehoshua Hana Rawnitzki|title=שירי שלמה בן יהודה אבן|place=תל אביבגבירול|script-title=he:Shire Shelomoh ben Yehudah ibn Gabirol: meḳubatsim ʼal-pi sefarim ṿe-kitve-yad|year=1928–1929|editor-last=ביאליק|editor-first=ח. נ.|editor-link=Hayim Nahman Bialik}}, [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/38217 vol. 1], [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/38220 vol. 2], [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/38219 vol. 3], [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/38218 vol. 4], [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/38216 vol. 5], [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/44148 vol. 6].
* ''Shelomoh Ibn Gabirol, shirei ha-ḥol'', ed. by H. Brody and J. Schirmann (Jerusalem 1975)
* ''Shirei ha-ḥol le-rabbi Shelomoh Ibn Gabirol'', ed. by Dov Jarden (Jerusalem, 1975)
* Selomó Ibn Gabirol, ''Selección de perlas = Mibḥar ha-penînîm: (máximas morales, sentencias e historietas)'', trans. by David Gonzalo Maeso (Barcelona: Ameller, 1977)
* Selomo Ibn Gabirol, ''Poesía secular'', trans. by Elena Romero ([Madrid]: Ediciones Alfaguara, 1978)
* Šelomoh Ibn Gabirol, ''Poemas seculares'', ed. by M. J. Cano (Granada: Universidad de Granada; [Salamanca]: Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, 1987)
* Ibn Gabirol, ''Poesía religiosa'', ed. by María José Cano (Granada: Universidad de Granada, 1992)
* ''Selected poems of Solomon Ibn Gabirol'', trans. by Peter Cole (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001)


==See also==
==See also==
Line 127: Line 208:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|refs=
{{reflist|30em|refs=

<ref name=eb9>{{cite encyclopedia
<ref name=eb9>{{cite EB9
| title = {{eb9|Avicebron}}
|wstitle=Avicebron
| encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Britannica
|volume=3
| edition = 9th
|page=152 }}</ref>
| volume =
| pages =
| publisher =
| date = 1878
| id =
| accessdate = }}</ref>


<ref name=hb37435>{{cite book
<ref name=hb37435>{{cite book
| last = Ibn Gabirol
|last=Ibn Gabirol
| first = Shelomo
|first=Shelomo
| title = Mivchar HaPninim
|title=Mivchar HaPninim
| date = 1899
|date=1899
| location = London
|location=London
| pages = 208
|pages=208
| language = Hebrew
|language=he
| url = http://hebrewbooks.org/37435
|url=http://hebrewbooks.org/37435
| accessdate = October 11, 2015 }}</ref>
|access-date=October 11, 2015 }}</ref>


<ref name=je-ibngabirol>{{cite Jewish Encyclopedia
<ref name=je-ibngabirol>{{cite Jewish Encyclopedia
Line 155: Line 231:


<ref name=Oesterley>{{cite book
<ref name=Oesterley>{{cite book
| last1 = Oesterley
|last1=Oesterley
| first1 = W. O. E.
|first1=W. O. E.
| last2 = Box
|last2=Box
| first2 = G. H.
|first2=G. H.
|title=A Short Survey of the Literature of Rabbinical and Mediæval Judaism
| authorlink =
|publisher=Burt Franklin
| title = A Short Survey of the Literature of Rabbinical and Mediæval Judaism
|date=1920
| publisher = Burt Franklin
|location=New York
| series =
}}</ref>
| volume =
| edition =
| date = 1920
| location = New York
| pages =
| language =
| url =
| doi =
| id =
| isbn =
| mr =
| zbl =
| jfm = }}</ref>


<ref name=Orient>{{cite journal
<ref name=Orient>{{cite journal
| last = Munk
|last=Munk
| first = Solomon
|first=Solomon
| authorlink = Solomon Munk
|author-link=Solomon Munk
| title = ??
|title=??
| journal = Literaturblatt des Orients
|journal=Literaturblatt des Orients
| volume = 46
|volume=46
| issue =
|date=1846
}}
| pages =
| publisher =
| location =
| date = 1846
| language =
| url =
| jstor =
| issn =
| doi =
| id =
| mr =
| zbl =
| jfm =
| accessdate = }}
Also, see {{cite book
Also, see {{cite book
| last = Munk
|last=Munk
| first = Salomon
|first=Salomon
|title=Mélanges de philosophie juive et arabe
| authorlink =
|publisher=A. Franck
| title = Mélanges de philosophie juive et arabe
|date=1859
| publisher = A. Franck
|location=Paris
| series =
| volume =
|language=fr
|url=https://archive.org/details/mlangesdephilos00munkgoog
| edition =
}}</ref>
| date = 1859
| location = Paris
| pages =
| language = French
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=0_c-wjdCLZwC&pg=PP9#v=onepage&q&f=false
| doi =
| id =
| isbn =
| mr =
| zbl =
| jfm = }}</ref>


<ref name=golem>{{cite book
<ref name=golem>{{cite book
| last= Bokser
|last=Bokser
| first= Ben Zion
|first=Ben Zion
| title= From the World of the Cabbalah
|title=From the World of the Cabbalah
| year= 2006
|year=2006
| publisher=Kessinger
|publisher=Kessinger
| pages=57
|pages=57
|isbn=9781428620858
| url=http://books.google.com/books?id=T2kv0gY8UhgC&pg=PA55&dq=Man,+being+incomplete,+is+not+at+rest+and+is+therefore+always+striving+for+his+completion...and+this+itself+is+his+perfection.&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false }}</ref>
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=T2kv0gY8UhgC&pg=PA55 }}</ref>


<ref name=davidson>{{cite book
<ref name=davidson>{{cite book
| last = Davidson
|last=Davidson
| first = Israel
|first=Israel
| translator-last = Zangwill
|translator-last=Zangwill
| translator-first = Israel
|translator-first=Israel
| authorlink = Israel Davidson
|author-link=Israel Davidson
| title = Selected Religious Poems of Solomon ibn Gabirol
|title=Selected Religious Poems of Solomon ibn Gabirol
| series = Schiff Library of Jewish Classics
|series=Schiff Library of Jewish Classics
| publisher = JPS
|publisher=JPS
| date = 1924
|date=1924
| location = Philadelphia
|location=Philadelphia
| pages = 247
|pages=247
| lccn = 73-2210
|lccn=73-2210
| isbn = 0-8276-0060-7
|isbn=0-8276-0060-7
| jfm = }}</ref>
}}</ref>


<ref name=yahya>{{cite book
<ref name=yahya>{{cite book
| last = ibn Yahya
|last=ibn Yahya
| first = Gedaliah
|first=Gedaliah
| authorlink = Gedaliah ibn Yahya ben Joseph
|author-link=Gedaliah ibn Yahya ben Joseph
| title = Shalshelet ha-Kabbalah
|title=Shalshelet ha-Kabbalah
| language = Hebrew
|language=he
| date = 1587
|date=1587
| location = Venice }}</ref>
|location=Venice }}</ref>

<ref name=pen>{{cite web
| title = Shelomo Ibn Gabirol (1021/22 – c. 1057/58)
| website = pen.org
| date = 16 February 2007
| publisher = Pen America
| url = http://www.pen.org/nonfiction/shelomo-ibn-gabirol-102122-c-105758
| access-date = October 14, 2015 }}</ref>

<ref name=chabad>{{cite web
| title = Solomon Ibn Gabirol
| website = chabad.org
| url = http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=111875
| access-date = October 14, 2015 }}</ref>

<ref name=stanford>{{cite encyclopedia
|last1=Pessin
|first1=Sarah
|editor-last=Zalta
|editor-first=Edward N.
|title=Solomon Ibn Gabirol [Avicebron]
|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
|edition=Summer 2014
|date=April 18, 2014
|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-gabirol/
|access-date=October 13, 2015}}</ref>

<ref name=sirat>{{cite book
|last=Sirat
|first=Colette
|author-link=Colette Sirat
|title=A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages
|publisher=Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|date=1985
|location=cambridge }}</ref>

<ref name=loewe>{{cite book
|last=Raphael
|first=Loewe
|title=Ibn Gabirol
|publisher=Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|date=1989
|location=London }}</ref>

<ref name=je1906>{{cite Jewish Encyclopedia
| article = IBN GABIROL, SOLOMON BEN JUDAH (ABU AYYUB SULAIMAN IBN YAḤYA IBN JABIRUL), known also as Avicebron
| url = http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6448-gabirol-solomon-ibn
| access-date = October 15, 2015 }}</ref>

<ref name=wine>{{cite book
|last=Scheindlin
|first=Raymond P.
|title=Wine, Women, & Death: Medieval Hebrew Poems on the Good Life
|publisher=Jewish Publication Society
|date=1986
|location=Philadelphia
|pages=204
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=URbeWXUpCG4C
|isbn=978-0195129878 }}</ref>
}}
}}

==Further reading==
*{{cite EB1911|wstitle=Ibn Gabirol |volume=14 |page=221}}
*{{cite Jewish Encyclopedia
| title=Ibn Gabirol, Solomon ben Judah|url=http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6448-gabirol-solomon-ibn}} Endnotes:
** H. Adler, Ibn Gabirol and His Influence upon Scholastic Philosophy, London, 1865;
** Ascher, A Choice of Pearls, London, 1859;
** Bacher, Bibelexegese der Jüdischen, Religionsphilosophen des Mittelalters, pp.&nbsp;45–55, Budapest, 1892;
** Bäumker, Avencebrolis Fons Vitæ, Muuünster, 1895;
** Beer, Philosaphie und Philosophische Schriftsteller der Juden, Leipsic, 1852;
** Bloch, Die Jüdische Religionsphilosophic, in Winter and Wünsche, Die Jüdische Litteratur, ii. 699–793, 723–729;
** Dukes, Ehrensäulen, und Denksteine, pp.&nbsp;9–25, Vienna, 1837;
** idem. Salomo ben Gabirol aus Malaga und die Ethischen Werke Desselben, Hanover, 1860;
** Eisler, Vorlesungen über die Jüdischen Philosophen des Mittelalters, i. 57–81, Vienna, 1876;
** Geiger, Salomo Gabirol und Seine Dichtungen, Leipsic, 1867;
** Graetz, History of the Jews. iii. 9;
** Guttmann, Die Philosophie des Salomon ibn Gabirol, Göttingen, 1889;
** Guttmann, Das Verhältniss des Thomas von Aquino zum Judenthum und zur Jödischen Litteratur, especially ii. 16–30, Götingen, 1891;
** Horovitz, Die Psychologie Ibn Gabirols, Breslau, 1900;
** Joël, Ibn Gebirol's Bedeutung für die Gesch. der Philosophie, Beiträge zur Gesch. der philosophie, i., Breslau, 1876;
** Kümpf, Nichtandalusische Poesie Andalusischer Dichter, pp.&nbsp;167–191, Prague, 1858;
** Karpeles, Gesch. der Jüdischen Litteratur, i. 465–483, Berlin, 1886;
** Kaufmann, Studien über Salomon ibn Gabirol, Budapest, 1899;
** Kaufmann, Gesch. der Attributtenlehre in der Jüd. Religionsphilosophie des Mittelaliers, pp.&nbsp;95–115, Gotha, 1877;
** Löwenthal, Pseudo-Aristoteles über die Seele, Berlin, 1891;
** Müller, De Godsleer der Middeleeuwsche Joden, pp.&nbsp;90–107, Groningen, 1898;
** Munk, Mélanges de Philosophie Juive et, Arabe, Paris, 1859;
** Myer, Qabbalah, The Philosophical Writings of . . . Avicebron, Philadelphia, 1888;
** Rosin, in J. Q. R. iii. 159–181;
** Sachs, Die Religiöse; Poesie der Juden in Spanien, pp.&nbsp;213–248, Berlin, 1845;
** Seyerlen, Die Gegenseitigen Beziehungen Zwischen Abendländischer und Morgenländischer Wissenschaft mit Besonderer Rücksicht auf Solomon ibn Gebirol und Seine Philosophische Bedeutung, Jena, 1899;
** Stouössel, Salomo ben Gabirol als Philosoph und Förderer der Kabbala, Leipsic, 1881;
** Steinschneider, Hebr. Uebers. pp.&nbsp;379–388, Berlin, 1893;
** Wise, The Improvement of the Moral Qualities, New York, 1901;
** Wittmann, Die Stellung des Heiligen Thomas von Aquin zu Avencebrol, Münster, 1900.
**''For Poetry'':
** Geiger, Salomo Gabirol und Seine Dichtungen, Leipsic, 1867;
** Senior Sachs, Cantiqucs de Salomon ibn Gabirole, Paris, 1868;
** idem, in Ha-Teḥiyyah, p.&nbsp;185, Berlin, 1850;
** Dukes, Schire Shelomo, Hanover, 1858;
** idem, Ehrensaülen, Vienna, 1837;
** Edelmann and Dukes, Treasures of Oxford, London, 1851;
** M. Sachs, Die Religiöse Poesie der Juden in Spanien, Berlin, 1845;
** Zunz, Literaturgesch. pp.&nbsp;187–194, 411, 588;
** Kämpf, Nichtandalusische Poesie Andalusischer Dichter, pp.&nbsp;167 et seq.;
** Brody, Kuntras ha-Pijutim nach dem Machsor Vitry, Berlin, 1894, Index.
*{{cite CE1913 |last=Turner |first=William |wstitle=Avicebron |volume=2}}


==External links==
==External links==
{{Wikiquote}}
{{wikisourcepar|Author:Solomon Ibn Gabirol|Solomon Ibn Gabirol}}
* {{sep entry|ibn-gabirol|Solomon Ibn Gabirol|Sarah Pessin}}
* {{wikisource author-inline|Solomon ibn Gabirol}}
* {{cite SEP |url-id=ibn-gabirol |title=Solomon Ibn Gabirol |last=Pessin |first=Sarah}} (''includes an extensive bibliography'')
* [http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/chapters/s6933.html An Andalusian Alphabet] introduction to his poems
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20060903172418/http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/chapters/s6933.html An Andalusian Alphabet] introduction to his poems
* [http://www.seforimonline.org/seforim/the_improvement_of_the_moral_qualities.pdf Improvement of the Moral Qualities] English translation at seforimonline.org
* [http://www.seforimonline.org/seforim/the_improvement_of_the_moral_qualities.pdf Improvement of the Moral Qualities]{{dead link|date=November 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} English translation at seforimonline.org
* [http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=111875 Solomon Ibn Gabirol] biography on chabad.org
* [http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=111875 Solomon Ibn Gabirol] biography on chabad.org
* [http://hibba.org/node/407 Traditional Sphardic Singing of Gabirol's Shabbat Poem Shimru Shabtotai]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160303183735/http://hibba.org/node/407 Traditional Sphardic Singing of Gabirol's Shabbat Poem Shimru Shabtotai]
* [http://hebrewbooks.org/33526 pdf of Azharot of Solomon Ibn Gabirol in Hebrew]
* [http://hebrewbooks.org/33526 pdf of Azharot of Solomon Ibn Gabirol in Hebrew]
* [https://ibngabirol.gitlab.io/ Ibn Gabirol Digital] digital humanities project on Ibn Gabirol's philosophical ideas

{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]]. -->
| NAME = Gabirol, Solomon ibn
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = Jewish poet
| DATE OF BIRTH =
| PLACE OF BIRTH = [[Málaga]]
| DATE OF DEATH =
| PLACE OF DEATH = [[Valencia]]
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Gabirol, Solomon ibn}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Gabirol, Solomon ibn}}
[[Category:1020s births]]
[[Category:1020s births]]
[[Category:1050s deaths]]
[[Category:1050s deaths]]
[[Category:11th-century Spanish people]]
[[Category:Hebrew-language poets]]
[[Category:Hebrew-language poets]]
[[Category:Jewish poets]]
[[Category:Jewish poets]]
[[Category:Jewish philosophers]]
[[Category:Medieval Jewish philosophers]]
[[Category:Sephardi rabbis]]
[[Category:Sephardi rabbis]]
[[Category:Jews of Al-Andalus]]
[[Category:11th-century rabbis in al-Andalus]]
[[Category:Moorish writers]]
[[Category:11th-century writers from al-Andalus]]
[[Category:People from Málaga]]
[[Category:People from Málaga]]
[[Category:Philosophers of Judaism]]
[[Category:Philosophers of Judaism]]
[[Category:Sephardi Jews]]
[[Category:Philosophers from al-Andalus]]
[[Category:Sephardi Jews topics]]
[[Category:11th-century Spanish poets]]
[[Category:Spanish philosophers]]
[[Category:Spanish poets]]
[[Category:11th-century rabbis]]
[[Category:People from Zaragoza]]
[[Category:People from Zaragoza]]
[[Category:Spanish male poets]]
[[Category:Spanish male poets]]
[[Category:11th-century Spanish philosophers]]
[[Category:Jewish liturgical poets]]

Revision as of 00:35, 22 May 2024

Solomon ben Yehuda ibn Gabirol
Avicebron
Modern depiction of Ibn Gabirol
Born1021 or 1022
Died1070 (1050?, 1058?)
Other namesAvicebron, Avicebrol
Notable workFons Vitæ
EraMedieval philosophy
RegionJewish philosophy
SchoolNeoplatonism
Main interests
Religious philosophy

Solomon ibn Gabirol or Solomon ben Judah (Hebrew: ר׳ שְׁלֹמֹה בֶּן יְהוּדָה אִבְּן גָּבִּירוֹל, romanizedShlomo Ben Yehuda ibn Gabirol, pronounced [ʃ(e)loˈmo ben jehuˈda ʔibn ɡabiˈʁol]; Arabic: أبو أيوب سليمان بن يحيى بن جبيرول, romanized’Abū ’Ayyūb Sulaymān bin Yaḥyá bin Jabīrūl, pronounced [ˈʔæbuː ʔæjˈjuːb sʊlæjˈmæːn bɪn ˈjæħjæː bɪn dʒæbiːˈruːl]) was an 11th-century Andalusi poet and Jewish philosopher in the Neo-Platonic tradition. He published over a hundred poems, as well as works of biblical exegesis, philosophy, ethics[1]: xxvii  and satire.[1]: xxv  One source credits ibn Gabirol with creating a golem,[2] possibly female, for household chores.[3]

In the 19th century it was discovered that medieval translators had Latinized Gabirol's name to Avicebron or Avencebrol and had translated his work on Jewish Neo-Platonic philosophy into a Latin form that had in the intervening centuries been highly regarded as a work of Islamic or Christian scholarship.[1]: xxxii [4] As such, ibn Gabirol is well known in the history of philosophy for the doctrine that all things, including soul and intellect, are composed of matter and form ("Universal Hylomorphism"), and for his emphasis on divine will.[3]

Biography

Ibn Gabirol statue in Málaga, Spain.
Statue in Caesarea, Israel.

Little is known of Gabirol's life, and some sources give contradictory information.[1]: xvi  Sources agree that he was born in Málaga, but are unclear whether in late 1021 or early 1022 CE.[1]: xvii  The year of his death is a matter of dispute, with conflicting accounts having him dying either before age 30 or by age 48.[3]

Gabirol lived a life of material comfort, never having to work to sustain himself, but he lived a difficult and loveless life, suffering ill health, misfortunes, fickle friendships, and powerful enemies.[1]: xvii–xxvi  From his teenage years, he suffered from some disease, possibly lupus vulgaris,[5] that would leave him embittered and in constant pain.[6] He indicates in his poems that he considered himself short and ugly.[6] Of his personality, Moses ibn Ezra wrote: "his irascible temperament dominated his intellect, nor could he rein the demon that was within himself. It came easily to him to lampoon the great, with salvo upon salvo of mockery and sarcasm."[5]: 17–18  He has been described summarily as "a social misfit."[7]: 12 

Gabirol's writings indicate that his father was a prominent figure in Córdoba, but was forced to relocate to Málaga during a political crisis in 1013.[1]: xvii  Gabirol's parents died while he was a child, leaving him an orphan with no siblings or close relatives.[1]: xviii  He was befriended, supported and protected by a prominent political figure of the time, Yekutiel ibn Hassan al-Mutawakkil ibn Qabrun,[6] and moved to Zaragoza, then an important center of Jewish culture.[1]: xviii  Gabirol's anti-social[3] temperament, occasionally boastful poetry, and sharp wit earned him powerful enemies, but as long as Jekuthiel lived, Gabirol remained safe from them[1]: xxiv  and was able to freely immerse himself in study of the Talmud, grammar, geometry, astronomy, and philosophy.[8] However, when Gabirol was seventeen years old, his benefactor was assassinated as the result of a political conspiracy, and by 1045 Gabirol found himself compelled to leave Zaragoza.[1]: xxiv [8] He was then sponsored by no less than the grand vizier and top general to the kings of Granada, Samuel ibn Naghrillah (Shmuel HaNaggid).[1]: xxv  Gabirol made ibn Naghrillah an object of praise in his poetry until an estrangement arose between them and ibn Naghrillah became the butt of Gabirol's bitterest irony. It seems Gabirol never married,[1]: xxvi  and that he spent the remainder of his life wandering.[9]

Gabirol had become an accomplished poet and philosopher at an early age:

  • By age 17, he had composed five of his known poems, one an azhara ("I am the master, and Song is my slave"[8]) enumerating all 613 commandments of Judaism.[1]: xix 
  • At age 17, he composed a 200-verse elegy for his friend Yekutiel[1]: xiv  and four other notable elegies to mourn the death of Hai Gaon.[8]
  • By age 19, he had composed a 400-verse alphabetical and acrostic poem teaching the rules of Hebrew grammar.[1]: xxv 
  • By age 23[8] or 25,[1]: xxv [6] he had composed, in Arabic, "Improvement of the Moral Qualities" (Arabic: كتاب إصلاح الأخلاق, translated into Hebrew by Judah ben Saul ibn Tibbon as Hebrew: תקון מדות הנפש[8]
  • At around age 25,[8] or not,[1]: xxv  he may have composed his collection of proverbs Mivchar Pninim (lit. "Choice of Pearls"), although scholars are divided on his authorship.[3]
  • At around age 28,[8] or not,[1]: xxv  he composed his philosophical work Fons Vitæ.[1]: xxv 

As mentioned above, the conflicting accounts of Gabirol's death have him dying either before age 30 or by age 48.[3] The opinion of earliest death, that he died before age 30, is believed to be based upon a misreading of medieval sources.[9] The remaining two opinions are that he died either in 1069 or 1070,[1]: xxvii  or around 1058 in Valencia.[9][10] As to the circumstances of his death, one legend claims that he was trampled to death by an Arab horseman.[8] A second legend[11] relates that he was murdered by a Muslim poet who was jealous of Gabirol's poetic gifts, and who secretly buried him beneath the roots of a fig tree. The tree bore fruit in abundant quantity and of extraordinary sweetness. Its uniqueness excited attention and provoked an investigation. The resulting inspection of the tree uncovered Gabirol's remains, and led to the identification and execution of the murderer.

Historical identity

Though Gabirol's legacy was esteemed throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance periods, it was historically minimized by two errors of scholarship that mis-attributed his works.

False ascription as King Solomon

Gabirol seems to have often been called "the Málagan", after his place of birth, and would occasionally so refer to himself when encrypting his signature in his poems (e.g. in "שטר עלי בעדים", he embeds his signature as an acrostic in the form "אני שלמה הקטן ברבי יהודה גבירול מאלקי חזק" – meaning: "I am young Solomon, son of Rabi Yehuda, from Malaqa, Hazak"). While in Modern Hebrew the city is also called Málaga (Hebrew: מאלגה), that is in deference to its current Spanish pronunciation. In Gabirol's day, when it was ruled by Arabic speakers, it was called Mālaqa (Arabic: مالقة), as it is to this day by Arabic speakers. The 12th-century Arab philosopher Jabir ibn Aflah misinterpreted manuscript signatures of the form "שלמה ... יהודה ... אלמלאק" to mean "Solomon ... the Jew .. the king", and so ascribed to Solomon some seventeen philosophical essays of Gabirol. The 15th-century Jewish philosopher Yohanan Alemanno imported that error back into the Hebrew canon, and added another four works to the list of false ascriptions.[1]: xxx 

Identification as Avicebron

In 1846, Solomon Munk discovered among the Hebrew manuscripts in the French National Library in Paris a work by Shem-Tov ibn Falaquera. Comparing it with a Latin work by Avicebron entitled Fons Vitæ, Munk proved them to both excerpt an Arabic original of which the Fons Vitæ was evidently the translation. Munk concluded that Avicebron or Avencebrol, who had for centuries been believed to be a Christian[6] or Arabic Muslim philosopher,[4] was instead identical with the Jewish Solomon ibn Gabirol.[1]: xxxi–xxxii [6][12] The centuries-long confusion was in part due to a content feature atypical in Jewish writings: Fons Vitæ exhibits an independence of Jewish religious dogma and does not cite Biblical verses or Rabbinic sources.[9]

The progression in the Latinization of Gabirol's name seems to have been ibn Gabirol, Ibngebirol, Avengebirol. Avengebrol, Avencebrol, Avicebrol, and finally Avicebron.[9] Some sources still refer to him as Avicembron, Avicenbrol, or Avencebrol.[3]

Philosophy

Gabirol, in his poem "כשרש עץ" (line 24), claims to have written twenty philosophical works. Through scholarly deduction (see above), we know their titles, but we have the texts of only two.[1]: xxxi 

Gabirol made his mark on the history of philosophy under his alias as Avicebron, one of the first teachers of Neo-Platonism in Europe, and author of Fons Vitæ .[9][13] As such, he is best known for the doctrine that all things, including soul and intellect, are composed of matter and form (“Universal Hylomorphism”), and for his emphasis on divine will.[3]

His role has been compared to that of Philo:[9] both were ignored by their fellow Jews, but exercised considerable influence upon Gentiles (Philo upon primitive Christianity, Gabirol upon medieval Christian scholasticism); and both served as cultural intermediaries (Philo between Hellenistic philosophy and the Oriental world; Gabirol between Greco-Arabic philosophy and the Occident).

Fons Vitæ

Fons Vitæ, originally written in Arabic under the title Yanbu' al-Hayat (Arabic: ينبوع الحياة) and later translated into Hebrew by Ibn Tibbon as Hebrew: מקור חיים, pronounced [mɛ.ˈkor xay.ˈyim], lit. "Source of Life", (cf. Psalms 36:10) is a Neo-Platonic philosophical dialogue between master and disciple on the nature of Creation and how understanding what we are (our nature) can help us know how to live (our purpose).[3] "His goal is to understand the nature of being and human being so that he might better understand and better inspire the pursuit of knowledge and the doing of good deeds."[3] The work stands out in the history of philosophy for introducing the doctrine that all things, including soul and intellect, are composed of matter and form, and for its emphasis on divine will.[3]

Student: What is the purpose of man?
Teacher: The inclination of his soul to the higher world in order that everyone might return to his like.
(Fons Vitæ 1.2, p. 4, lines 23–25)[3]

In the closing sentences of the Fons Vitæ (5.43, p. 338, line 21), ibn Gabirol further describes this state of “return” as a liberation from death and a cleaving to the source of life.[3]

The work was originally composed in Arabic, of which no copies are extant. It was preserved for the ages by a translation into Latin in the year 1150 by Abraham ibn Daud and Dominicus Gundissalinus, who was the first official director of the Toledo School of Translators, a scholastic philosopher, and the archdeacon of Segovia, Spain.[1]: xxx  In the 13th century, Shem Tov ibn Falaquera wrote a summary of Fons Vitæ in Hebrew,[3] and only in 1926 was the full Latin text translated into Hebrew.[8]

Fons Vitæ consists of five sections:[9]

  1. matter and form in general and their relation in physical substances (Latin: substantiæ corporeæ sive compositæ);
  2. the substance which underlies the corporeality of the world (Latin: de substantia quæ sustinet corporeitatem mundi);
  3. proofs of the existence of intermediaries between God and the physical world (Latin: substantiæ simplices, lit. "intelligibiles");
  4. proofs that these "intelligibiles" are likewise constituted of matter and form;
  5. universal matter and universal form.

Fons Vitæ posits that the basis of existence and the source of life in every created thing is a combination of "matter" (Latin: materia universalis) and "form". The doctrine of matter and form informed the work's subtitle: "De Materia et Forma."[14] Its chief doctrines are:[9]

  1. everything that exists may be reduced to three categories:
    1. God;
    2. matter and form (i.e. Creation);
    3. will (an intermediary).
  2. All created beings are constituted of form and matter.
  3. This holds true for both the physical world (Latin: substantiis corporeis sive compositis) and the spiritual world (Latin: substantiis spiritualibus sive simplicibus), which latter are the connecting link between the first substance (i.e. the Godhead, Latin: essentia prima) and the physical world (Latin: substantia, quæ sustinet novem prædicamenta, lit. "substance divided into nine categories").
  4. Matter and form are always and everywhere in the relation of "sustinens" and "sustentatum", "propriatum" and "proprietas": substratum and property or attribute.

Influence within Judaism

Though Gabirol as a philosopher was ignored by the Jewish community, Gabirol as a poet was not, and through his poetry, he introduced his philosophical ideas.[4] His best-known poem, Keter Malkut ("Royal Crown"), is a philosophical treatise in poetical form, the "double" of the Fons Vitæ. For example, the eighty-third line of the poem points to one of the teachings of the Fons Vitæ; namely, that all the attributes predicated of God exist apart in thought alone and not in reality.[9]

Moses ibn Ezra is the first to mention Gabirol as a philosopher, praising his intellectual achievements, and quoting several passages from the Fons Vitæ in his own work, Aruggat ha-Bosem.[9] Abraham ibn Ezra, who cites Gabirol's philosophico-allegorical Bible interpretation, borrows from the Fons Vitæ both in his prose and in his poetry without giving due credit.[9]

The 12th-century philosopher Joseph ibn Tzaddik borrows extensively from the "Fons Vitæ" in his work Microcosmos.[9]

Another 12th-century philosopher, Abraham ibn Daud of Toledo, was the first to take exception to Gabirol's teachings. In Sefer ha-Kabbalah he praises Gabirol as a poet. But to counteract the influence of ibn Gabirol the philosopher, he wrote an Arabic book, translated into Hebrew under the title Emunah Ramah, in which he reproaches Gabirol for having philosophized without any regard to the requirements of the Jewish religious position and bitterly accuses him of mistaking a number of poor reasons for one good one.[9] He criticizes Gabirol for being repetitive, wrong-headed and unconvincing.[3]

Occasional traces of ibn Gabriol's thought are found in some of the Kabbalistic literature of the 13th century. Later references to ibn Gabirol, such as those of Elijah Chabillo, Isaac Abarbanel, Judah Abarbanel, Moses Almosnino, and Joseph Solomon Delmedigo, are based on an acquaintance with the scholastic philosophy, especially the works of Aquinas.[9]

The 13th-century Jewish philosopher Berechiah ha-Nakdan drew upon Gabirol's works in his encyclopedic philosophical text Sefer Haḥibbur (Hebrew: ספר החיבור, pronounced [ˈsefeʁ haχiˈbuʁ], lit. "The Book of Compilation").

Influence on Scholasticism

For over six centuries, the Christian world regarded Fons Vitæ as the work of a Christian philosopher[6] or Arabic Muslim philosopher,[1]: xxxi–xxxii [4][6][12] and it became a cornerstone and bone of contention in many theologically charged debates between Franciscans and Dominicans.[3][9] The Aristotelian Dominicans led by St. Albertus Magnus and St. Thomas Aquinas opposed the teachings of Fons Vitæ; the Platonist Franciscans led by Duns Scotus supported its teachings, and led to its acceptance in Christian philosophy, influencing later philosophers such as the 16th-century Dominican friar Giordano Bruno.[9] Other early supporters of Gabirol's philosophy include the following:[9]

  • Dominicus Gundissalinus, who translated the Fons Vitæ into Latin and incorporated its ideas into his own teaching.
  • William of Auvergne, who refers to the work of Gabirol under the title Fons Sapientiæ. He speaks of Gabirol as a Christian and praises him as "unicus omnium philosophantium nobilissimus."
  • Alexander of Hales and his disciple Bonaventura, who accept the teaching of Gabirol that spiritual substances consist of matter and form.
  • William of Lamarre

The main points at issue between Gabirol and Aquinas were as follows:[9]

  1. the universality of matter, Aquinas holding that spiritual substances are immaterial;
  2. the plurality of forms in a physical entity, which Aquinas denied;
  3. the power of activity of physical beings, which Gabirol affirmed. Aquinas held that Gabirol made the mistake of transferring to real existence the theoretical combination of genus and species, and that he thus came to the erroneous conclusion that in reality all things are constituted of matter and form as genus and species respectively.

Ex nihilo

Gabirol denied the idea of "creation ex nihilo" because he felt that that idea would make God "subject to the [laws of existence]".[15]

Ethics

The Improvement of the Moral Qualities

Sight Hearing

Pride
Meekness
Pudency
Impudence

Love
Hate
Mercy
Hard-heartedness (cruelty)

Smell Taste

Wrath
Good-will (suavity)
Jealousy
Wide-awakeness

Joy (cheerfulness)
Grief (apprehensiveness)
Tranquillity
Penitence (remorse)

Touch

Liberality
Miserliness
Valor
Cowardice

The Improvement of the Moral Qualities, originally written in Arabic under the title Islah al-Khlaq (Arabic: إصلاح الأخلاق), and later translated by Ibn Tibbon as (Hebrew: "תקון מדות הנפש", pronounced [ti.'kun mi.ˈdot ha.ˈne.feʃ]) is an ethical treatise that has been called by Munk "a popular manual of morals."[9]: Ethical Treatise  It was composed by Gabirol at Zaragoza in 1045, at the request of some friends who wished to possess a book treating of the qualities of man and the methods of effecting their improvement.[9]

The innovations in the work are that it presents the principles of ethics independently of religious dogma and that it proposes that the five physical senses are emblems and instruments of virtue and vice, but not their agents; thus, a person's inclination to vice is subject to a person's will to change.[9] Gabirol presents a tabular diagram of the relationship of twenty qualities to the five senses, reconstructed at right,[9] and urges his readers to train the qualities of their souls unto good through self-understanding and habituation. He regards man's ability to do so as an example of divine benevolence.[9]

While this work of Gabirol is not widely studied in Judaism, it has many points in common with Bahya ibn Paquda's very popular[citation needed] work Chovot HaLevavot,[9] written in 1040, also in Zaragoza.

Mivchar HaPeninim

Mivhar ha-Peninim, traditionally thought to have been written by Solomon ibn Gabirol,[3] 1899 edition with corrected text and a facing English translation.[16]

Mukhtar al-Jawahir (Arabic: مختار الجواهر), Mivchar HaPeninim (Hebrew: מבחר הפנינים. lit. "The Choice of Pearls"), an ethics work of sixty-four chapters, has been attributed to Gabirol since the 19th century, but this is doubtful.[17] It was originally published, along with a short commentary, in Soncino, Italy, in 1484, and has since been re-worked and re-published in many forms and abridged editions (e.g. Joseph Ḳimcḥi versified the work under the title "Shekel ha-Kodesh").[9]

The work is a collection of maxims, proverbs, and moral reflections, many of them of Arabic origin, and bears a strong similarity to the Florilegium of Hunayn ibn Ishaq and other Arabic and Hebrew collections of ethics sayings, which were highly prized by both Arabs and Jews.[9]

Poetry

Gabirol wrote both sacred and secular poems, in Hebrew, and was recognized even by his critics (e.g. Moses ibn Ezra and Yehuda Alharizi) as the greatest poet of his age.[1]: xxii  His secular poems express disillusionment with social mores and worldliness, but are written with a sophistication and artistry that reveals him to have been socially influenced by his worldly Arabic contemporaries.[7]

Gabirol's lasting poetic legacy, however, was his sacred works. Today, "his religious lyrics are considered by many to be the most powerful of their kind in the medieval Hebrew tradition, and his long cosmological masterpiece, Keter Malchut, is acknowledged today as one of the greatest poems in all of Hebrew literature."[6] His verses are distinctive for tackling complex metaphysical concepts, expressing scathing satire, and declaring his religious devotion unabashedly.[6]

Gabirol wrote with a pure Biblical Hebrew diction that would become the signature style of the Spanish school of Hebrew poets,[9] and he popularized in Hebrew poetry the strict Arabic meter introduced by Dunash ben Labrat. Abraham ibn Ezra[18] calls Gabirol, not ben Labrat, "the writer of metric songs," and in Sefer Zaḥot uses Gabirol's poems to illustrate various poetic meters.[9]

He wrote also more than one hundred piyyuṭim and selichot for the Sabbath, festivals, and fast-days, most of which have been included in the Holy Day prayer books of Sephardim, Ashkenazim, and even Karaites[9] Some of his most famous in liturgical use include the following:[8]

Gabirol's most famous poem is Keter Malchut (lit. Royal Crown), which, in 900 lines, describes the cosmos as testifying to its own creation by God, based upon the then current (11th-century) scientific understanding of the cosmos.

Some popular examples that are often sung outside of the liturgy include: Shalom L'ben Dodi,[19] Shachar Abakeshcha.[citation needed][example needed]

Gabirol's poetry has been set to music by the modern composer Aaron Jay Kernis, in an album titled "Symphony of Meditations."[20]

In 2007 Gabirol's poetry has been set to music by the Israeli rock guitarist Berry Sakharof and the Israeli modern composer Rea Mochiach, in a piece titled "Red Lips" ("Adumey Ha-Sefatot" "אֲדֻמֵּי הַשְּׂפָתוֹת") [21]

Editions and translations

  • אבן גבירול שלמה ב"ר יהודה הספרדי (1928–1929). ביאליק, ח. נ.; רבניצקי, ח. (eds.). שירי שלמה בן יהודה אבן Shire Shelomoh ben Yehudah ibn Gabirol: meḳubatsim ʼal-pi sefarim ṿe-kitve-yad. תל אביבגבירול.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link), vol. 1, vol. 2, vol. 3, vol. 4, vol. 5, vol. 6.
  • Shelomoh Ibn Gabirol, shirei ha-ḥol, ed. by H. Brody and J. Schirmann (Jerusalem 1975)
  • Shirei ha-ḥol le-rabbi Shelomoh Ibn Gabirol, ed. by Dov Jarden (Jerusalem, 1975)
  • Selomó Ibn Gabirol, Selección de perlas = Mibḥar ha-penînîm: (máximas morales, sentencias e historietas), trans. by David Gonzalo Maeso (Barcelona: Ameller, 1977)
  • Selomo Ibn Gabirol, Poesía secular, trans. by Elena Romero ([Madrid]: Ediciones Alfaguara, 1978)
  • Šelomoh Ibn Gabirol, Poemas seculares, ed. by M. J. Cano (Granada: Universidad de Granada; [Salamanca]: Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, 1987)
  • Ibn Gabirol, Poesía religiosa, ed. by María José Cano (Granada: Universidad de Granada, 1992)
  • Selected poems of Solomon Ibn Gabirol, trans. by Peter Cole (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001)

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa Davidson, Israel (1924). Selected Religious Poems of Solomon ibn Gabirol. Schiff Library of Jewish Classics. Translated by Zangwill, Israel. Philadelphia: JPS. p. 247. ISBN 0-8276-0060-7. LCCN 73-2210.
  2. ^ Bokser, Ben Zion (2006). From the World of the Cabbalah. Kessinger. p. 57. ISBN 9781428620858.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Pessin, Sarah (April 18, 2014). "Solomon Ibn Gabirol [Avicebron]". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved October 13, 2015.
  4. ^ a b c d Baynes, T. S., ed. (1878). "Avicebron" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3 (9th ed.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 152.
  5. ^ a b Raphael, Loewe (1989). Ibn Gabirol. London: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Shelomo Ibn Gabirol (1021/22 – c. 1057/58)". pen.org. Pen America. 16 February 2007. Retrieved October 14, 2015.
  7. ^ a b Scheindlin, Raymond P. (1986). Wine, Women, & Death: Medieval Hebrew Poems on the Good Life. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society. p. 204. ISBN 978-0195129878.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "Solomon Ibn Gabirol". chabad.org. Retrieved October 14, 2015.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad Public Domain Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "IBN GABIROL, SOLOMON BEN JUDAH (ABU AYYUB SULAIMAN IBN YAḤYA IBN JABIRUL), known also as Avicebron". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. Retrieved October 15, 2015.
  10. ^ Sirat, Colette (1985). A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages. cambridge: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. ^ ibn Yahya, Gedaliah (1587). Shalshelet ha-Kabbalah (in Hebrew). Venice.
  12. ^ a b Munk, Solomon (1846). "??". Literaturblatt des Orients. 46. Also, see Munk, Salomon (1859). Mélanges de philosophie juive et arabe (in French). Paris: A. Franck.
  13. ^ Oesterley, W. O. E.; Box, G. H. (1920). A Short Survey of the Literature of Rabbinical and Mediæval Judaism. New York: Burt Franklin.
  14. ^ The manuscript in the Mazarine Library is entitled "De Materia Universali"
  15. ^ Armstrong, Karen (1996). A History of God: The 4000-year Quest of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc. p. 186. ISBN 978-0-679-42600-4.
  16. ^ Ibn Gabirol, Shelomo (1899). Mivchar HaPninim (in Hebrew). London. p. 208. Retrieved October 11, 2015.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  17. ^ Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "Ibn Gabirol, Solomon ben Judah". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
  18. ^ Commentary on Gen. 3: 1
  19. ^ "ArtScroll.com - The ArtScroll Sephardic Siddur - Schottenstein Edition". www.artscroll.com. Retrieved 2024-01-14.
  20. ^ "Kernis Takes On Ibn Gabirol in 'Meditations'". PBS. July 2009.
  21. ^ "Berry Sakharof discography". Discogs.

Further reading

  • Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Ibn Gabirol" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 14 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 221.
  • Public Domain Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "Ibn Gabirol, Solomon ben Judah". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. Endnotes:
    • H. Adler, Ibn Gabirol and His Influence upon Scholastic Philosophy, London, 1865;
    • Ascher, A Choice of Pearls, London, 1859;
    • Bacher, Bibelexegese der Jüdischen, Religionsphilosophen des Mittelalters, pp. 45–55, Budapest, 1892;
    • Bäumker, Avencebrolis Fons Vitæ, Muuünster, 1895;
    • Beer, Philosaphie und Philosophische Schriftsteller der Juden, Leipsic, 1852;
    • Bloch, Die Jüdische Religionsphilosophic, in Winter and Wünsche, Die Jüdische Litteratur, ii. 699–793, 723–729;
    • Dukes, Ehrensäulen, und Denksteine, pp. 9–25, Vienna, 1837;
    • idem. Salomo ben Gabirol aus Malaga und die Ethischen Werke Desselben, Hanover, 1860;
    • Eisler, Vorlesungen über die Jüdischen Philosophen des Mittelalters, i. 57–81, Vienna, 1876;
    • Geiger, Salomo Gabirol und Seine Dichtungen, Leipsic, 1867;
    • Graetz, History of the Jews. iii. 9;
    • Guttmann, Die Philosophie des Salomon ibn Gabirol, Göttingen, 1889;
    • Guttmann, Das Verhältniss des Thomas von Aquino zum Judenthum und zur Jödischen Litteratur, especially ii. 16–30, Götingen, 1891;
    • Horovitz, Die Psychologie Ibn Gabirols, Breslau, 1900;
    • Joël, Ibn Gebirol's Bedeutung für die Gesch. der Philosophie, Beiträge zur Gesch. der philosophie, i., Breslau, 1876;
    • Kümpf, Nichtandalusische Poesie Andalusischer Dichter, pp. 167–191, Prague, 1858;
    • Karpeles, Gesch. der Jüdischen Litteratur, i. 465–483, Berlin, 1886;
    • Kaufmann, Studien über Salomon ibn Gabirol, Budapest, 1899;
    • Kaufmann, Gesch. der Attributtenlehre in der Jüd. Religionsphilosophie des Mittelaliers, pp. 95–115, Gotha, 1877;
    • Löwenthal, Pseudo-Aristoteles über die Seele, Berlin, 1891;
    • Müller, De Godsleer der Middeleeuwsche Joden, pp. 90–107, Groningen, 1898;
    • Munk, Mélanges de Philosophie Juive et, Arabe, Paris, 1859;
    • Myer, Qabbalah, The Philosophical Writings of . . . Avicebron, Philadelphia, 1888;
    • Rosin, in J. Q. R. iii. 159–181;
    • Sachs, Die Religiöse; Poesie der Juden in Spanien, pp. 213–248, Berlin, 1845;
    • Seyerlen, Die Gegenseitigen Beziehungen Zwischen Abendländischer und Morgenländischer Wissenschaft mit Besonderer Rücksicht auf Solomon ibn Gebirol und Seine Philosophische Bedeutung, Jena, 1899;
    • Stouössel, Salomo ben Gabirol als Philosoph und Förderer der Kabbala, Leipsic, 1881;
    • Steinschneider, Hebr. Uebers. pp. 379–388, Berlin, 1893;
    • Wise, The Improvement of the Moral Qualities, New York, 1901;
    • Wittmann, Die Stellung des Heiligen Thomas von Aquin zu Avencebrol, Münster, 1900.
    • For Poetry:
    • Geiger, Salomo Gabirol und Seine Dichtungen, Leipsic, 1867;
    • Senior Sachs, Cantiqucs de Salomon ibn Gabirole, Paris, 1868;
    • idem, in Ha-Teḥiyyah, p. 185, Berlin, 1850;
    • Dukes, Schire Shelomo, Hanover, 1858;
    • idem, Ehrensaülen, Vienna, 1837;
    • Edelmann and Dukes, Treasures of Oxford, London, 1851;
    • M. Sachs, Die Religiöse Poesie der Juden in Spanien, Berlin, 1845;
    • Zunz, Literaturgesch. pp. 187–194, 411, 588;
    • Kämpf, Nichtandalusische Poesie Andalusischer Dichter, pp. 167 et seq.;
    • Brody, Kuntras ha-Pijutim nach dem Machsor Vitry, Berlin, 1894, Index.
  • Turner, William (1907). "Avicebron" . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

External links