Pudgalavada: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎top: Added header
Flagged some questionable material, copyedits, and formatting fixes
Line 1: Line 1:
{{EarlyBuddhism}}
{{EarlyBuddhism}}
The '''Pudgalavāda''' ([[Sanskrit]]; {{zh|t=補特伽羅論者|p=Bǔtèjiāluō Lùnzhě}}) or "Personalist" school of [[Buddhism]] broke off from the orthodox [[Sthaviravada|Sthaviravāda]] (elders) school around 280 BCE.
The '''Pudgalavāda''' ([[Sanskrit]]; {{zh|t=補特伽羅論者|p=Bǔtèjiāluō Lùnzhě}}) or "Personalist" school of [[Buddhism]] separated from the [[Sthavira nikāya]] around 280 BCE.


==Pudgala or "person"==
==Pudgala or "person"==
The Sthaviravādins interpreted the doctrine of [[anatta]] to mean that, since there is no true "self", all that we think of as a self (i.e., the subject of sentences, the being that transmigrates) is merely the aggregated [[skandha]]s. The Pudgalavādins asserted that, while there is no [[atman (Hinduism)|ātman]], there is a pudgala or "person", which is neither the same as nor different from the skandhas. The "person" was their method of accounting for [[karma]], [[Rebirth (Buddhist)|rebirth]], and [[Nirvana (concept)|nirvana]]. Other schools held that the "person" exists only as a label, a nominal reality.
The Sthaviravādins{{who}} interpreted the doctrine of [[anatta]] to mean that, since there is no true "self", all that we think of as a self (i.e., the subject of sentences, the being that transmigrates) is merely the aggregated [[skandha]]s.{{fact}} The Pudgalavādins asserted that, while there is no [[atman (Hinduism)|ātman]], there is a pudgala or "person", which is neither the same as nor different from the skandhas. The "person" was their method of accounting for [[karma]], [[Rebirth (Buddhist)|rebirth]], and [[Nirvana (concept)|nirvana]]. Other schools held that the "person" exists only as a label, a nominal reality.


==Criticisms of the pudgala theory==
==Criticisms of the pudgala theory==
The Pudgalavādins were strongly criticized by the [[Theravadins]] (a record of a Theravadin attack on the pudgala is found in the [[Kathavatthu]]), Sarvastivadins, and [[Madhyamaka]]s. Peter Harvey agrees with criticisms levelled against the Pudgalavadins by [[Moggaliputta-Tissa]] and [[Vasubandhu]], and finds that there is no support in the Theravada nikayas for their "person"-concept.<ref>Peter Harvey, ''The Selfless Mind.'' Curzon Press, 1995, pages 34-38.</ref>
Pudgalavādin views were sharply criticized by the [[Theravada|Theravadins]] (a record of a Theravadin attack on the pudgala is found in the ''[[Kathavatthu]]''), Sarvastivadins, and [[Mādhyamaka]]. Peter Harvey agrees with criticisms levelled against the Pudgalavadins by [[Moggaliputta-Tissa]] and [[Vasubandhu]], and finds that there is no support in the Pali nikayas for their "person"-concept.<ref>Peter Harvey, ''The Selfless Mind.'' Curzon Press, 1995, pages 34-38.</ref>


==Relationship to the Sammitiya==
==Relationship to the Sammitiya==
Among the most prominent of the Pudgalavādin schools were the [[Sammitiya]]. The distinguished Buddhologist [[Etienne Lamotte]], using the writings of the Chinese traveler [[Xuanzang]], asserted that the Sammitiya were in all likelihood the most populous non-Mahayanist sect in India, comprising double the number of the next largest sect,<ref>Lamotte, Etienne. ''History of Indian Buddhism''. 1988. pg 539-544</ref> although scholar [[L. S. Cousins]] revised his estimate down to a quarter of all non-Mahayana monks, still the largest overall.<ref>"Person and the Self." Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies, Vol. 2, pgs 84-101</ref> They continued to be a presence in India until the end of Indian Buddhism, but, never having gained a foothold elsewhere, did not continue thereafter.
Among the most prominent of the Pudgalavādin schools were the [[Sammitiya]]. The distinguished Buddhologist [[Etienne Lamotte]], using the writings of the Chinese traveler [[Xuanzang]], asserted that the Sammitiya were in all likelihood the most populous non-Mahayanist sect in India, comprising double the number of the next largest sect,<ref>Lamotte, Etienne. ''History of Indian Buddhism''. 1988. pg 539-544</ref> although scholar [[L. S. Cousins]] revised his estimate down to a quarter of all non-Mahayana monks, still the largest overall.<ref>"Person and the Self." Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies, Vol. 2, pgs 84-101</ref> They continued to be a presence in India until the end of Indian Buddhism, but, never having gained a foothold elsewhere, did not continue thereafter.


== Notes ==
==Notes==
{{reflist|1}}
{{reflist|1}}



Revision as of 16:23, 19 July 2014

The Pudgalavāda (Sanskrit; Chinese: 補特伽羅論者; pinyin: Bǔtèjiāluō Lùnzhě) or "Personalist" school of Buddhism separated from the Sthavira nikāya around 280 BCE.

Pudgala or "person"

The Sthaviravādins[who?] interpreted the doctrine of anatta to mean that, since there is no true "self", all that we think of as a self (i.e., the subject of sentences, the being that transmigrates) is merely the aggregated skandhas.[citation needed] The Pudgalavādins asserted that, while there is no ātman, there is a pudgala or "person", which is neither the same as nor different from the skandhas. The "person" was their method of accounting for karma, rebirth, and nirvana. Other schools held that the "person" exists only as a label, a nominal reality.

Criticisms of the pudgala theory

Pudgalavādin views were sharply criticized by the Theravadins (a record of a Theravadin attack on the pudgala is found in the Kathavatthu), Sarvastivadins, and Mādhyamaka. Peter Harvey agrees with criticisms levelled against the Pudgalavadins by Moggaliputta-Tissa and Vasubandhu, and finds that there is no support in the Pali nikayas for their "person"-concept.[1]

Relationship to the Sammitiya

Among the most prominent of the Pudgalavādin schools were the Sammitiya. The distinguished Buddhologist Etienne Lamotte, using the writings of the Chinese traveler Xuanzang, asserted that the Sammitiya were in all likelihood the most populous non-Mahayanist sect in India, comprising double the number of the next largest sect,[2] although scholar L. S. Cousins revised his estimate down to a quarter of all non-Mahayana monks, still the largest overall.[3] They continued to be a presence in India until the end of Indian Buddhism, but, never having gained a foothold elsewhere, did not continue thereafter.

Notes

  1. ^ Peter Harvey, The Selfless Mind. Curzon Press, 1995, pages 34-38.
  2. ^ Lamotte, Etienne. History of Indian Buddhism. 1988. pg 539-544
  3. ^ "Person and the Self." Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies, Vol. 2, pgs 84-101

See also

Further reading

  • Priestley, Leonard (1999). Pudgalavāda Buddhism: The Reality of the Indeterminate Self. Toronto: Centre for South Asian Studies, University of Toronto.

External links