Jump to content

Iron ore and Haumea: Difference between pages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Planet
[[Image:HematitaEZ.jpg|thumb|250px| Hematite: the main iron ore in Brazilian mines]]
| bgcolour = #FFFFC0
[[Image:LightningVolt Iron Ore Pellets.jpg|thumb|right|250px|This heap of iron ore pellets will be used in [[steel]] production.]]
| name = Haumea
'''Iron ores''' are [[Rock (geology)|rocks]] and [[mineral]]s from which [[metal]]lic [[iron]] can be economically extracted. The ores are usually rich in [[iron oxide]]s and vary in colour from dark grey, bright yellow, deep purple, to rusty red. The iron itself is usually found in the form of [[magnetite]] (Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>), [[hematite]] (Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>),(alt spelling: haematite) [[goethite]], [[limonite]] or [[siderite]]. Hematite is also known as "natural ore". The name refers to the early years of mining, when certain hematite ores contained 66% iron and could be fed directly into iron making blast furnaces. Iron ore is the raw material used to make [[pig iron]], which is one of the main raw materials to make [[steel]]. 98% of the mined iron ore is used to make steel.<ref>{{cite web
| image = [[Image:2003EL61art.jpg|300px]]
|url=http://www.mii.org/Minerals/photoiron.html
| caption = Artist's conception of Haumea,<br /> with its moons, Hi{{okina}}iaka and Namaka<br />&nbsp;
|title= IRON ORE - Hematite, Magnetite & Taconite
| discovery = yes
|work=Mineral Information Institute
| discoverer= [[Michael E. Brown|Brown]] ''et al.''; [[José Luis Ortiz Moreno|Ortiz]] ''et al.'' (neither official)
|accessdate=2006-04-07}}</ref>
| discovered=2004 December 28 (Brown ''et al.''); 2005 July (Ortiz ''et al.'')
| mp_name= (136108) Haumea
| alt_names={{mp|2003 EL|61}}
| mp_category=[[dwarf planet]], [[plutoid]], [[Trans-Neptunian object|TNO]] <span style="white-space:nowrap;">([[cubewano]]?)</span><ref name=K08O05/><ref name=Buie>{{cite web
|author=[[Marc W. Buie]]
|date=2008/06/25
|title=Orbit Fit and Astrometric record for 136108
|publisher=SwRI (Space Science Department)
|url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~buie/kbo/astrom/136108.html
|accessdate=2008-10-02}}</ref><br />fifth-order [[Resonant trans-Neptunian object|12:7 resonance]]?<ref name=candidate/>
| orbit_ref = <ref name=jpldata/>
| epoch=[[2005-08-18]] ([[Julian day|JD]] 2&nbsp;453&nbsp;600.5)
| semimajor=6&nbsp;484 [[Giga|G]][[metre|m]] (43.335 [[Astronomical unit|AU]])
| perihelion=5&nbsp;260 Gm (35.164 AU)
| aphelion=7&nbsp;708 Gm (51.526 AU)
| eccentricity=0.188&nbsp;74
| period=104&nbsp;234 [[day|d]] (285.4 [[Julian year (astronomy)|a]])
| inclination=28.19[[degree (angle)|°]]
| asc_node=121.90°
| arg_peri=239.51°
| mean_anomaly=198.07°
| avg_speed=4.484 km/[[second|s]]
| satellites=2
| physical_characteristics=yes
| dimensions= ~1960&nbsp;×&nbsp;1518&nbsp;×&nbsp;996 km<ref name="Rabinowitz2006" /><br/>(~1400 km)<br />1150 {{±|250|100}} km<ref name=spitzer>{{cite web
|title=Physical Properties of Kuiper Belt and Centaur Objects: Constraints from Spitzer Space Telescope
|author=John Stansberry, Will Grundy, Mike Brown, Dale Cruikshank, John Spencer, David Trilling, Jean-Luc Margot
|work=University of Arizona, Lowell Observatory, California Institute of Technology, NASA Ames Research Center, Southwest Research Institute, Cornell University
|url=http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0702538v2
|date=2007-02-20
|accessdate=2008-07-27}}</ref>
| radius=~980&nbsp;×&nbsp;759&nbsp;×&nbsp;498 km (~750 km)
| surface_area=
| volume=
| mass=(4.2&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.1){{e|21}} [[kilogram|kg]]<ref name="Brown2005"/>
| density=2.6–3.3 g/[[cubic centimetre|cm³]]<ref name="Rabinowitz2006"/>
| surface_grav=0.44 m/s²
| escape_velocity=0.84 km/s
| sidereal_day=0.163&nbsp;14&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.000&nbsp;01 d<br/>(3.915&nbsp;4&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.000&nbsp;2 h)<ref name=hour>{{cite journal|title=High-Precision Photometry of Extreme KBO 2003 EL61|author=Pedro Lacerda, David Jewitt and Nuno Peixinho|date=2008-04-02|journal=The Astronomical Journal|volume= 135 |pages=1749–1756|url=http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1538-3881/135/5/1749|accessdate=2008-09-22|doi=10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1749}}</ref>
| spectral_type=?
| magnitude = 17.3 ([[Opposition (astronomy and astrology)|opposition]])<ref name=Horizons>{{cite web
|title=HORIZONS Web-Interface
|publisher=[http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov JPL Solar System Dynamics]
|url=http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi?find_body=1&body_group=sb&sstr=2003EL61
|accessdate=2008-07-02}}</ref>
| abs_magnitude=0.17<ref name=jpldata>{{cite web
|date=2008-05-10 last obs
|title=JPL Small-Body Database Browser: 136108 Haumea (({{mp|2003 EL|61}})|publisher=NASA's JPL
|url=http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=136108
|accessdate=2008-06-11}}</ref>
| albedo=0.7&nbsp;±&nbsp;0.1<ref name="Rabinowitz2006"/>
| single_temperature=<50&nbsp;[[kelvin|K]]<ref name="Trujillo 2006"/>
}}
'''Haumea''' ({{pron-en|haʊˈmeɪə}} {{respell|how|MAY|ə}}), [[Minor planet names|formal designation]] '''(136108) Haumea''', is a [[dwarf planet]] in the [[Kuiper belt]], one-third the mass of [[Pluto]]. It was discovered in 2004 by a team headed by [[Michael E. Brown|Mike Brown]] at [[Caltech]] and the [[Mauna Kea Observatory]] in the [[United States]], and in 2005 by a team headed by [[José Luis Ortiz Moreno|J. L. Ortiz]] at the [[Sierra Nevada Observatory]] in [[Spain]], though the latter claim has been contested. On September 17, 2008, it was classified as a dwarf planet by the [[International Astronomical Union]] and named after ''[[Haumea (mythology)|Haumea]]'', the Hawaiian goddess of childbirth.


Haumea is very unusual among the known [[trans-Neptunian object]]s especially due to its extreme elongation. Although its shape has not been directly observed, calculations from its [[light curve]] suggest it is an [[ellipsoid]] twice as long along its greatest [[Axis of rotation|axis]] as its shortest. Nonetheless, its [[gravity]] is believed sufficient for it to have relaxed into [[hydrostatic equilibrium]], so it meets the definition of a dwarf planet. This elongation, along with other characteristics such as its unusually rapid rotation, high density, and high [[albedo]]—thought to be due to a layer of water ice on the surface—are thought to be the results of a [[Impact event|giant collision]], which left Haumea the largest member of a [[collisional family]] that includes its two known moons.
==Sources==
Pure iron is virtually unknown on the surface of the Earth except as Fe-Ni alloys from [[meteorite]]s and very rare forms of deep mantle [[xenolith]]s. Therefore, all sources of iron used by human industry exploit iron [[oxide]] minerals, the primary form which is used in industry being [[hematite]].


==Classification==
However, in some situations, more inferior iron ore sources have been used by industrialized societies when access to high-grade hematite ore was not available. This has included utilisation of [[taconite]] in the United States, particularly during [[World War II]], and [[goethite]] or [[bog ore]] used during the [[American Revolution]] and the [[Napoleonic war]]s. [[Magnetite]] is often used because it is [[magnetic]] and hence easily liberated from the [[gangue]] minerals.
Haumea is classified as a dwarf planet, meaning that it is believed to be massive enough to have reached a state of [[hydrostatic equilibrium]], but not enough to have [[cleared the neighborhood|cleared its neighborhood]] of similar objects. It orbits beyond [[Neptune]], which together with being a dwarf planet defines it as a [[plutoid]].<ref name=usgs/> Since it is not proven to be in [[orbital resonance|resonance]] with Neptune, nor likely capable of being significantly [[Perturbation (astronomy)|perturbed]] by it, Haumea was provisionally listed as a [[classical Kuiper belt object]], the most numerous population of [[trans-Neptunian object]]s observed to date.<ref name=K08O05>{{cite web|title=MPEC 2008-O05 : Distant Minor Planets (2008 AUG. 2.0 TT)|date=2008-07-17|publisher=Minor Planet Center|url=http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/mpec/K08/K08O05.html|accessdate=2008-09-27}}[http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/mpec/K06/K06X45.html (older provisional Cubewano listing)]</ref> Although Haumea is thought to be far from spherical, it is considered a dwarf planet because its suspected ellipsoidal shape is the equilibrium state resulting from its rapid rotation—in much the same way that a water balloon stretches out when tossed with a spin—and is not due to Haumea having insufficient gravity to overcome the [[tensile strength]] of its material.<ref name=iau/> Indeed, Haumea is currently the best illustration that a body need not be spherical to be a planet or dwarf planet.


==Name==
Inferior sources of iron ore generally require [[beneficiation]]. Due to the high density of hematite relative to [[silicates]], beneficiation usually involves a combination of crushing and milling as well as heavy liquid separation. This is achieved by passing the finely crushed ore over a bath of solution containing [[bentonite]] or other agent which increases the density of the solution. When the density of the solution is properly calibrated, the hematite will sink and the silicate mineral fragments will float and can be removed.
Until it was given a permanent name, the [[Caltech]] discovery team used the nickname '''"Santa"''' among themselves, as they had discovered Haumea on December 28, 2004, just after [[Christmas]].<ref name=brownblog>{{cite web|publisher=Mike Brown's Planets|title=Haumea|author=Mike Brown|date=2008-09-17|url=http://www.mikebrownsplanets.com/2008/09/haumea.html|accessdate=2008-09-22}} [http://www.mikebrownsplanets.com/2008/09/haumea.html?showComment=1221758760000#c3311727812106209920 (Namaka occultations)]</ref> On September 7, 2006, after the Spanish team announced the discovery to the [[Minor Planet Center]] (MPC) in July 2005, Haumea was given its first official label, the temporary designation '''{{mp|(136108) 2003 EL|61}}''', with the "2003" based on the date of the Spanish discovery image.


Following [[Astronomical naming conventions#Minor planets|guidelines]] established by the IAU that classical KBOs be given names of mythological beings associated with creation,<ref>{{cite news| title=Naming of astronomical objects: Minor planets|work=International Astronomical Union| url=http://www.iau.org/public_press/themes/naming/#minorplanets| accessdate=2008-11-17}}</ref> in September 2006 the Caltech team submitted formal names from [[Hawaiian mythology]] to the IAU for both {{mp|(136108) 2003 EL|61}} and its moons, in order "to pay homage to the place where the satellites were discovered".<ref name=mike>{{cite web| title=Dwarf planets: Haumea|author=Mike Brown|work=CalTech|date=2008-09-17|url=http://web.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/2003EL61/|accessdate=2008-09-18}}</ref> The names were proposed by [[David Rabinowitz]] of the Caltech team.<ref name=iau>{{cite news| url=http://www.iau.org/public_press/news/release/iau0807/| title=IAU names fifth dwarf planet Haumea| publisher=IAU Press Release| date=2008-09-17| accessdate = 2008-09-17}}</ref> ''[[Haumea (mythology)|Haumea]]'' is the patron goddess of the island of [[Hawaii (island)|Hawai{{okina}}i]], where the [[Mauna Kea Observatory]] is located. In addition, she is identified with ''[[Papahanaumoku|Pāpā]],'' the goddess of the earth and wife of ''[[Wākea]]'' (space),<ref name="craig">{{cite book|author=Robert D. Craig |title=Handbook of Polynesian Mythology |publisher=ABC-CLIO |date=2004 |url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=LOZuirJWXvUC&pg=PA128&dq=haumea&lr=&sig=ACfU3U3pDIRAYQihFLO5R-rkQ1Y2G3OHxg |pages=128 }}</ref> which is appropriate because {{mp|(136108) 2003 EL|61}} is thought to be composed almost entirely solid rock, without the thick ice mantle over a small rocky core typical of other known [[Kuiper belt object]]s.<ref name=iaunews>{{cite web|title=News Release - IAU0807: IAU names fifth dwarf planet Haumea|work=International Astronomical Union|date=2008-09-17|url=http://www.iau.org/public_press/news/release/iau0807/|accessdate=2008-09-18}}</ref> Lastly, ''Haumea'' is the goddess of fertility and childbirth, with many children who sprang from different parts of her body;<ref name = craig/> this corresponds to the swarm of icy bodies thought to have broken off {{mp|(136108) 2003 EL|61}} during an ancient collision. The two known moons, also believed to have been born in this manner, are thus named after two of ''Haumea'''s daughters, ''[[Hi'iaka|Hi{{okina}}iaka]]'' and ''[[Namaka]]''.<ref name=iaunews/>
Iron ore mining methods vary by the type of ore being mined. There are four main types of iron ore deposits worked currently, depending on the mineralogy and geology of the ore deposits. These are magnetite, titanomagnetite, massive hematite and [[pisolite|pisolitic]] ironstone deposits.


==Discovery controversy==
===Magnetite banded iron deposits===
{{main|Controversy over the discovery of Haumea}}
[[Banded iron formation]]s (BIF) are fine grained metamorphosed [[sedimentary rock]]s composed predominantly of [[magnetite]] and silica (as [[quartz]]). Banded Iron formations are locally known as [[taconite]] within North America.
Two teams claim credit for the discovery of Haumea. Mike Brown and his team at Caltech discovered Haumea in December 2004 on images they had taken on May 6, 2004. On July 20, 2005, they published an online abstract of a report intended to announce the discovery at a conference in September 2005.<ref name=trail>{{cite web|author=Michael E Brown|url=http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/planetlila/ortiz/|title=The electronic trail of the discovery of {{mp|2003 EL|61}}|work=CalTech|accessdate=2006-08-16}}</ref> Around this time, José Luis Ortiz Moreno and his team at at the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía at Sierra Nevada Observatory in Spain, the found Haumea on images taken on March 7–10, 2003.<ref name=Sanz/> Ortiz emailed the MPC with their discovery on the night of July 27, 2005, giving a discovery date of March 7, 2003.<ref name=Sanz/>


Brown came to suspect the Spanish team of fraud upon learning that his observation logs were accessed from the Spanish observatory the day before the discovery announcement—logs which included enough information to allow the Ortiz team to [[precovery|precover]] Haumea in their 2003 images,—and then were accessed again just before Ortiz scheduled telescope time to obtain confirmation images for a second announcement to the MPC on July 29. Ortiz later admitted he had accessed the Caltech observation logs but denied any wrongdoing, stating he was merely verifying whether they had discovered a new object.<ref name=ortiz1>{{cite news| author=Jeff Hecht|url=http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:BOHJuCoCuo8J:www.newscientist.com/article.ns%3Fid%3Ddn8033+Astronomer+denies+improper+use+of+web+data&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=uk| title=Astronomer denies improper use of web data| date=2005-09-21| publisher=NewScientist.com| accessdate=2006-08-16}}</ref>
Mining of BIF formations involves coarse crushing and screening, followed by rough crushing and fine grinding to comminute the ore to the point where the crystallised magnetite and quartz are fine enough that the quartz is left behind when the resultant powder is passed under a magnetic separator.


IAU protocol is that discovery credit for a [[minor planet]] goes to whoever first submits a report to the MPC with enough positional data for a decent determination of its orbit, and that the credited discoverer has priority in choosing a name. However, the IAU announcement on September 17, 2008, that Haumea had been accepted as a dwarf planet, made no mention of a discoverer. The location of discovery was listed as the Sierra Nevada Observatory of the Spanish team,<ref name=usgs/><ref name=marsden>{{cite web|title=Controversial dwarf planet finally named 'Haumea'|author=Rachel Courtland|work=NewScientistSpace|date=2008-09-19|url=http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn14759-controversial-dwarf-planet-finally-named-haumea.html|accessdate=2008-09-19}}</ref> but the chosen name, Haumea, was the Caltech proposal.<ref name=Sanz>{{cite web|title=La historia de Ataecina vs Haumea|url=http://www.infoastro.com/200809/26ataecina-haumea.html|publisher=infoastro.com|author= Pablo Santos Sanz|date=2008-26-09|accessdate=2008-09-29|language=Spanish}} {{es icon}}</ref>
The mining involves moving tremendous amounts of ore and waste. The waste comes in two forms, bedrock in the mine ([[mullock]]) that isn't ore, and unwanted minerals which are an intrinsic part of the ore rock itself ([[gangue]]). The mullock is mined and piled in waste dumps, and the gangue is separated during the [[beneficiation]] process and is removed as tailings. Taconite tailings are mostly the mineral [[quartz]], which is chemically inert. This material is stored in large, regulated water settling ponds.


==Orbit and rotation==
The key economic parameters for magnetite ore being economic are the crystallinity of the magnetite, the grade of the iron within the BIF host rock, and the contaminant elements which exist within the magnetite concentrate. The size and strip ratio of most magnetite resources is irrelevant as BIF formations can be hundreds of metres thick, with hundreds of kilometres of strike, and can easily come to more than 2,500 million tonnes of contained ore.
[[Image:TheKuiperBelt Orbits 2003EL61.svg|thumb|300px|Orbits of Haumea (yellow) and Pluto (red), relative to that of Neptune (grey)]]
Haumea has a typical orbit for a [[classical Kuiper Belt object|classical trans-Neptunian object]], with an [[orbital period]] of 285 Earth years, a [[perihelion]] of 35&nbsp;AU, and an [[orbital inclination]] of 28°.<ref name=jpldata/> The diagram at right shows the orbital position of Haumea in yellow, compared to [[Pluto]] in red and [[Neptune]] in grey, [[as of 2006|as of April 2006]]. Haumea passed [[aphelion]] in early 1992,<ref name=Horizons/> and is currently more than 50&nbsp;AU from the Sun.


Haumea's orbit lies at a slightly higher [[inclination]] than the other members of [[Haumea family|its collisional family]]. This may be due to a possible 12:7 [[orbital resonance]] with Neptune. Such a resonance would have shifted its orbit over the course of the last billion years,<ref name=largest>{{cite web|title=The largest Kuiper belt objects|author=Michael E. Brown|work=CalTech|url=http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/papers/ps/kbochap.pdf|accessdate=2008-09-19}}</ref> through the [[Kozai mechanism|Kozai effect]], which allows the exchange of an orbit's [[orbital eccentricity|eccentricity]] for increased inclination.
The typical grade of iron at which a magnetite-bearing banded iron formation becomes economic is roughly 25% Fe, which can generally yield a 33% to 40% recovery of magnetite by weight, to produce a concentrate grading in excess of 64% Fe by weight. The typical magnetite iron ore concentrate has less than 0.1% phosphorus, 3-7% silica and less than 3% aluminium.


With a [[visual magnitude]] of 17.5, Haumea is the [[List of the brightest KBOs|third brightest object in the Kuiper belt]] after Pluto and [[Makemake (dwarf planet)|Makemake]].<ref name="Rabinowitz2006"/> However, since the planets and most of the [[small Solar System bodies]] still remain in a [[invariable plane|common orbital alignment]], left after their [[formation and evolution of the Solar System|formation]] in the [[protoplanetary disk|primordial disk]] of the Solar System, most early surveys for distant objects<ref name ="TrujilloBrown2003">{{cite journal|author=C. A. Trujillo and M. E. Brown|title=The Caltech Wide Area Sky Survey. Earth Moon and Planets|pages=92–99|volume=112|date=June 2003|doi=10.1023/B:MOON.0000031929.19729.a1.|doi_brokendate=2008-10-12}}</ref> focused on the projection on the sky of this common plane, the [[ecliptic]]. As the region of sky close to the ecliptic became well explored, successive sky surveys began looking for objects that had been dynamically excited into orbits with higher inclinations, and also objects that were more distant, with slower [[mean motion|mean motions]] across the sky.<ref name="Brown2004">{{cite journal|author=Brown, M. E.; Trujillo, C.; Rabinowitz, D. L.|year=2004|title=Discovery of a candidate inner Oort cloud planetoid|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=617|issue=1|pages=645–649|doi=10.1086/422095}}</ref><ref name="Schwamb2008">{{cite journal|author=Schwamb, M. E.; Brown, M. E.; Rabinowitz, D. L.|year=2008|title=Constraints on the distant population in the region of Sedna|journal=American Astronomical Society|issue=DPS meeting \#40}, \#38.07}}</ref> This made possible the discovery of Haumea, with its high orbital inclination (65% greater than Pluto's 17°) and its current position far from the ecliptic.
The grain size of the magnetite and its degree of comingling with the silica groundmass determine the grind size to which the rock must be comminuted to enable efficient magnetic separation to provide a high purity magnetite concentrate. This determines the energy inputs required to run a milling operation. Generally most magnetite BIF deposits must be ground to between 32 and 45 micrometres in order to provide a low-silica magnetite concentrate. Magnetite concentrate grades are generally in excess of 63% Fe by weight and usually are low phosphorus, low aluminium, low titanium and low silica and demand a premium price.


Haumea rotates roughly once every four hours, faster than any other known equilibrium body in the [[Solar System]] and indeed faster than any known body larger than 100&nbsp;km in diameter.<ref name="Rabinowitz2006"/> Its short rotation period is likely to have been caused by the same giant impact which created its satellites and its collisional family.<ref name="BrownBarkume2007"/>
Currently magnetite iron ore is mined in [[Minnesota]] and [[Michigan]] in the [[United States|U.S.]], and Eastern [[Canada]] mine [[taconite]]. Magnetite bearing BIF is currently mined extensively in Brazil, which exports significant quantities to Asia, and there is a nascent and large magnetite iron ore industry in Australia.


==Physical characteristics==
===Magmatic magnetite ore deposits===
===Size, shape and composition===
Occasionally [[granite]] and [[ultrapotassic]] [[igneous rock]]s segregate magnetite crystals and form masses of magnetite suitable for economic concentration. A few iron ore deposits, notably in [[Chile]], are formed from [[volcanic]] flows containing significant accumulations of magnetite phenocrysts. Chilean magnetite iron ore deposits within the [[Atacama Desert]] have also formed [[alluvial]] accumulations of magnetite in streams leading from these volcanic formations.
<imagemap>
Image:EightTNOs.png|thumb|250px|left|Haumea compared to Eris, Pluto, Makemake, Sedna, Orcus, Quaoar, Varuna, and Earth (all to scale)
#Earth
rect 646 1714 2142 1994 [[Earth|The Earth]]
#Eris and Dysnomia
circle 226 412 16 [[Dysnomia (moon)|Dysnomia]]
circle 350 626 197 [[Eris (dwarf planet)|(136199) Eris]]
#Pluto and Charon
circle 1252 684 86 [[Charon (moon)|Charon]]
circle 1038 632 188 [[Pluto|(134340) Pluto]]
#Makemake
circle 1786 614 142 [[Makemake (dwarf planet)|(136472) Makemake]]
#Haumea
circle 2438 616 155 [[Haumea (dwarf planet)|(136108) Haumea]]
#Sedna
circle 342 1305 137 [[90377 Sedna|(90377) Sedna]]
#Orcus
circle 1088 1305 114 [[90482 Orcus|(90482) Orcus]]
#Quaoar
circle 1784 1305 97 [[50000 Quaoar|(50000) Quaoar]]
#Varuna
circle 2420 1305 58 [[20000 Varuna|(20000) Varuna]]
#link to image (under all other links)
rect 0 0 2749 1994 [[Image:EightTNOs.png]]


desc none
Some magnetite [[skarn]] and [[hydrothermal]] deposits have been worked in the past as high-grade iron ore deposits requiring little [[beneficiation]]. There are several granite-associated deposits of this nature in Malaysia and Indonesia.
# - setting this to "bottom-right" will display a (rather large) icon linking to the graphic, if desired


#Notes:
Other sources of magnetite iron ore include metamorphic accumulations of massive [[magnetite]] ore such as at [[Savage River, Tasmania|Savage River]], [[Tasmania]], formed by shearing of [[ophiolite]] [[ultramafic]]s.
#Details on the new coding for clickable images is here: [[mw:Extension:ImageMap]]
#While it may look strange, it's important to keep the codes for a particular system in order. The clickable coding treats the first object created in an area as the one on top.
#Moons should be placed on "top" so that their smaller circles won't disappear "under" their respective primaries.
</imagemap>


The only way to estimate the size of a small, isolated [[trans-Neptunian object]] is to use the body's [[optical magnitude]] and location, and assuming a value for its [[albedo]]. For larger, brighter objects, their [[Infrared|thermal emission]] can also be measured, which gives direct evidence for the albedo.<ref name=spitzer/> The mass can only be crudely estimated by assuming a value for its density. However, the addition of a satellite allows the mass of the system to be calculated directly from the satellite's orbit using [[Kepler's laws of planetary motion#Kepler's understanding of the laws|Kepler's third law]]. It the case of Haumea, the result is 4.2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>21</sup> kg, or 28% the mass of the [[Pluto]]nian system. Nearly all of this mass is in Haumea.<ref name="Brown2005">{{cite journal|author=[[Michael E. Brown|M. E. Brown]], A. H. Bouchez, [[David L. Rabinowitz|D. L. Rabinowitz]], R. Sari, [[Chadwick A. Trujillo|C. A. Trujillo]], M. A. van Dam, R. Campbell, J. Chin, S. Hartman, E. Johansson, R. Lafon, D. LeMignant, P. Stomski, D. Summers, P. L. Wizinowich|title=Keck Observatory laser guide star adaptive optics discovery and characterization of a satellite to large Kuiper belt object {{mp|2003 EL|61}}|journal=The Astrophysical Journal Letters|volume=632|pages=L45|date=October 2005|format=[http://www.gps.caltech.edu/%7Embrown/papers/ps/EL61.pdf full text from Caltech]|doi=10.1086/497641}}</ref>
Another, minor, source of iron ores are magmatic accumulations in [[ultramafic to mafic layered intrusions]] which contain a typically titanium-bearing magnetite crystal rock (magnetitite) often with vanadium. These ores form a niche market, with specialty smelters used to recover the iron, titanium and vanadium. These ores are beneficiated essentially similar to banded iron formation ores, but usually are more easily upgraded via crushing and screening. The typical titanomagnetite concentrate grades 57% Fe, 12% Ti and 0.5% V2O5.


[[Image:Haumea.svg|thumb|right|The calculated ellipsoid shape of Haumea, 1960×1518×996 km. At left are the minimum and maximum equatorial silhouettes (1960×996 and 1518×996 km); at right is the view from the pole (1960×1518 km).]]
===Hematite ore===
Haumea displays large fluctuations in brightness over a period of 4 hours, indicating that it rotates faster than any other large object known in the Solar system. The [[Rigid body dynamics|rotational physics]] of [[deformable bodies]] implies that over [[deep time|geological time]], Haumea has been distorted into the [[Hydrostatic equilibrium|equilibrium form]] of a [[ellipsoid|scalene ellipsoid]] by this four-hour rotational period, and it is thought that the alternating display of side view–end view–side view causes most of the brightness fluctuation.<ref name="Rabinowitz2006"/> These fluctuations could also be partially due to a mottled surface.<ref name=hour/>
Hematite iron ore deposits are currently exploited on all continents, with the largest intensity in South America, Australia and Asia. Most large hematite iron ore deposits are sourced from [[metasomatism|metasomatically]] altered banded iron formations and rarely igneous accumulations.


The rapid rotation and elongated shape, together with the well-defined mass provided by the existence of its moons, provide strong constraints on the composition of Haumea. Mass and volume are the requirements to calculate [[density]] — and the denser the object, the less elongate and more spherical it becomes, for a given rotational period. This constrains Haumea's density to around 2.6–3.3&nbsp;g/cm³, a value typical of [[silicate minerals]] such as [[olivine]] and [[pyroxene]], which from the [[Earth#Chemical composition|element abundances]] in the [[Formation and evolution of the solar system#Formation of planets|solar nebula]] form the [[Planetary differentiation|rock-dominated]] objects of the Solar System. For comparison, the [[Moon|Earth's moon]], which is mostly rock, has a density of 3.3&nbsp;g/cm³, while Pluto, a typical icy object in the Kuiper belt, has a density of 2.0&nbsp;g/cm³. Models of [[Pluto (dwarf planet)#Appearance and composition|Pluto's structure]] suggest that its lower mean density is due to a thick mantle of [[volatiles|ice]] over a small [[silicate|rocky]] core. If Haumea had a density closer to that of Pluto, implying a Pluto-like composition, it would have an even greater elongate distortion. This suggests that Haumea has a substantial rocky content, with a thin ice veneer.<ref name = mike/> The original thick ice mantle with which it is likely to have formed may have been removed during the massive collision that formed Haumea's [[Haumea family|collisional family]].<ref name = "BrownBarkume2007"/>
Hematite iron is typically rarer than magnetite bearing BIF or other rocks which form its main source or protolith rock, but it is considerably cheaper and easier to beneficiate the hematite ores and requires considerably less energy to crush and grind. Hematite ores however can contain significantly higher concentrations of penalty elements, typically being higher in phosphorus, water content (especially [[pisolite]] sedimentary accumulations) and aluminium ([[Clay mineral|clays]] within pisolites).


The limits on mass and density place constrains on Haumea's possible dimensions.<ref name="Rabinowitz2006">{{cite journal|author=[[David L. Rabinowitz|D. L. Rabinowitz]], K. M. Barkume, [[Michael E. Brown|M. E. Brown]], H. G. Roe, M. Schwartz, S. W. Tourtellotte, [[Chadwick A. Trujillo|C. A. Trujillo]] |year=2006|title=Photometric Observations Constraining the Size, Shape, and Albedo of {{mp|2003 EL|61}}, a Rapidly Rotating, Pluto-Sized Object in the Kuiper Belt|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=639|issue=2|pages=1238–1251|format=[http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509401 preprint on arXiv]|doi=10.1086/499575}}</ref> The best fit to the data [[as of 2008]] is that Haumea is approximately the diameter of Pluto along its longest axis and about half the diameter of Pluto at its poles. This would make it one of the largest trans-Neptunian objects discovered, and possibly fourth after {{dp|Eris}}, [[Pluto]], and [[Makemake (dwarf planet)|Makemake]]. It would be larger than {{dp|Sedna}}, {{dp|Orcus}}, and {{dp|Quaoar}}.<ref>{{cite journal| author = J. Stansberry, W. Grundy, M. Brown, ''et al.''| title=Physical Properties of Kuiper Belt and Centaur Objects: Constraints from Spitzer Space Telescope|url=http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0702538v1| journal = The Solar System beyond Neptune| publisher = University of Arizona Press | date=2008-04-17| format=abstract| accessdate=2008-08-04}}</ref>
In [[Australia]] iron ore is won from three main sources: pisolite "[[channel-iron deposits|channel iron deposit]]" ore derived by mechanical erosion of primary banded-iron formations and accumulated in alluvial channels such as at [[Pannawonica, Western Australia]]; and the dominant metasomatically-altered [[banded iron formation]] related ores such as at [[Newman, Western Australia|Newman]], the [[Chichester Range]], the [[Hamersley Range]] and [[Koolyanobbing, Western Australia|Koolyanobbing]], [[Western Australia]]. Other types of ore are coming to the fore recently, such as oxidised ferruginous hardcaps, for instance [[laterite]] iron ore deposits near [[Lake Argyle]] in Western Australia.


===Surface===
The total recoverable reserves of iron ore in [[India]] are about 9,602 million tones of [[hematite]] and 3,408 million tones of [[magnetite]]. [[Madhya Pradesh]], [[Karnataka]], [[Bihar]], [[Orissa]], [[Goa]], [[Maharashtra]], [[Andhra Pradesh]], [[Kerala]], [[Rajasthan]] and [[Tamil Nadu]] are the principal Indian producers of iron ore.
In 2005, the [[Gemini Observatory|Gemini]] and [[Keck Observatory|Keck]] telescopes obtained [[spectrum|spectra]] of Haumea which showed strong crystalline [[ice|water ice]] features similar to the surface of Pluto's moon [[Charon (moon)|Charon]].<ref name="Trujillo 2006">{{cite journal|author=[[Chadwick A. Trujillo]], [[Michael E. Brown]], Kristina Barkume, Emily Shaller, [[David Rabinowitz]]|title=The Surface of {{mp|2003 EL|61}} in the Near Infrared|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=655|date=February 2007|pages=1172–1178|format=[http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601618 preprint]|doi=10.1086/509861}}</ref> This is peculiar, because crystalline ice forms at temperatures above 110&nbsp;K, and the surface temperature of Haumea is below 50&nbsp;K, and at this temperature the energetically preferred form of ice is an [[amorphous]] structure.<ref name="Trujillo 2006"/> In addition, the lattice structure of crystalline ice is unstable under the constant rain of energetic particles from the Sun and cosmic rays from other stars that strike trans-Neptunian objects.<ref name="Trujillo 2006"/> The timescale for the crystalline ice to revert to [[amorphous ice]] under this bombardment is on the order of ten million years,<ref>{{cite web|title=Charon: An ice machine in the ultimate deep freeze|work=Gemini Observatory|date=2007-07-17|url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0707/17charon/|accessdate=2007-07-18}}</ref> and trans-Neptunian objects have been in their present distant, cold-temperature locations for timescales close to the multi-billion year age of the Solar System.<ref name=largest/> Radiation damage should also redden and darken the surface of trans-Neptunian objects where the common surface materials of [[organic molecule|organic]] ices and [[tholin|tholin-like]] compounds are present. Therefore, the spectra and [[colour index|colour]] suggest Haumea and its family members have undergone resurfacing that produced fresh ice. However, no plausible resurfacing mechanism has been found to account for their apparent youth.<ref>{{cite journal|title=The Youthful Appearance of the 2003 EL61 Collisional Family|author=David L. Rabinowitz, Bradley E. Schaefer, Martha W. Schaefer, Suzanne W. Tourtellotte|date=2008-04-17|journal=ArXiv.org |url=http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2864|accessdate=2008-09-20}}</ref>


Consistent with a surface of crystalline ice, Haumea is about as bright as snow, with an albedo greater than 0.6.<ref name="Rabinowitz2006"/> However, this unusually high albedo does not appear to be unique among large TNOs. Recent measurements of [[136199 Eris|Eris]] imply an even higher (inferred) albedo of 0.86.<ref>{{cite journal | title = Direct measurement of the size of 2003 UB313 from the [[Hubble Space Telescope]]| author = [[Michael E. Brown|M. E. Brown]], E.L. Schaller, H.G. Roe, [[David L. Rabinowitz|D. L. Rabinowitz]], [[Chadwick A. Trujillo|C. A. Trujillo]]| journal = The Astronomical Journal | date = 2006-02-08| volume =643| issue = 2| pages = L61–L63| doi = 10.1086/504843| url=http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/papers/ps/xsize.pdf}}</ref> Surprisingly, 66% to 80% of the Haumean surface appears to be covered in pure crystalline ice, the remainder being material of unknown composition.<ref name="Trujillo 2006"/>
== Production and consumption ==
{| border="1" cellpadding="2" align="right" style="text-align: center; background: #FFFFFF;"
|''Estimated iron ore production<br>in million metric tons for 2006<br>
<small>according to U.S. Geological Survey</small><ref>{{cite web|url=http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/iron_ore/|title=U.S. Geological Survey|accessdate=2008-01-29}}</ref>''
{{Standard table|1}}
! style="background: #ddffdd;"|Country
! style="background: #ddffdd;"|Production
|-----
| align="center" | [[China]] || 520
|-----
| align="center" |[[Brazil]]|| 300
|-----
| align="center" | [[Australia]] || 270
|-----
| align="center" |[[India]] || 150
|-----
| align="center" |[[Russia]] || 105
|-----
| align="center" | [[Ukraine]] || 73
|-----
| align="center" |[[United States]]|| 54
|-----
| align="center" | [[South Africa]] || 40
|-----
| align="center" | [[Canada]] || 33
|-----
| align="center" |[[Sweden]] || 24
|-----
| align="center" |[[Venezuela]] || 20
|-----
| align="center" | [[Iran]] ||20
|-----
| align="center" | [[Kazakhstan]] || 15
|-----
| align="center" |[[Mauritania]] || 11
|-----
| align="center" | Other countries || 43
|-----
| align="center" | Total world || 1690
|}
|}


Best fit modeling of the surface composition that would produce the observed spectra suggests that one strong contributor to the high albedo may be [[hydrogen cyanide]] or [[Silicate minerals#Phyllosilicates|phyllosilicate clays]].<ref name="Trujillo 2006"/> Inorganic cyanide salts such as copper potassium cyanide may also be present.<ref name="Trujillo 2006"/> In strong contrast to [[Makemake (dwarf planet)|Makemake]], the absence of a measurement of methane in the spectra means that no more than 10% of Haumea's surface could be covered in methane.<ref name="Trujillo 2006"/>
Iron is the world's most commonly used metal. It is used primarily in structural engineering applications and in maritime purposes, automobiles, and general industrial applications (machinery).


One analysis of color variations in Haumea's light curve found shifts that could not be explained by its shape, suggesting that there is a region on the surface that differs both in color and albedo from the average.<ref name=hour/> Such surface variations have been found on [[Pluto]],<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077880/ | publisher=MSNBC | title=Pluto regains its place on the fringe | author=Alan Boyle | date=[[1999-02-11]] | accessdate=2008-10-12}}</ref> but further light curve observations of Haumea would be needed to confirm if these also occur on Haumea.
Iron-rich rocks are common worldwide, but ore-grade commercial [[mining]] operations are dominated by the countries listed in the table aside. The major constraint to economics for iron ore deposits is not necessarily the grade or size of the deposits, because it is not particularly hard to geologically prove enough tonnage of the rocks exist. The main constraint is the position of the iron ore relative to market, the cost of rail infrastructure to get it to market and the energy cost required to do so.


==Moons==
World production averages one billion metric tons of raw ore annually. The world's largest producer of iron ore is the Brazilian mining corporation [[Companhia Vale do Rio Doce|Vale]], followed by Anglo-Australian companies [[BHP Billiton]] and [[Rio Tinto Group]]. A further Australian supplier, [[Fortescue Metals Group]] Ltd may eventually bring Australia's production to second in the world.
[[Image:2003 EL61.jpg|thumb|200px|[[Keck telescope|Keck]] image of Haumea and its two moons. Hi{{okina}}iaka is above Haumea (center), and Namaka is directly below.]]
{{main|Moons of Haumea|Hi'iaka (moon)|Namaka (moon)}}
Two small [[natural satellite|satellites]] have been discovered orbiting Haumea, [[Hi'iaka (moon)|(136108) Haumea I Hi{{okina}}iaka]] and [[Namaka (moon)|(136108) Haumea II Namaka]].<ref name=usgs>{{cite news| publisher=USGS Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature| title=Dwarf Planets and their Systems|url=http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/append7.html#DwarfPlanets| accessdate=2008-09-17}}</ref> They were both discovered in 2005, through observations with the [[W.M. Keck Observatory]] by a team headed by Mike Brown at [[Caltech]], only a few years after [[occultation]]s of Hi{{okina}}iaka with Haumea in 1999. Hi{{okina}}iakan occultations will not happen again until 2138.<ref name=shadows>{{cite web|title=Moon shadow Monday (fixed)|author=Mike Brown|date=2008-05-18|publisher=publisher=Mike Brown's Planets|url=http://www.mikebrownsplanets.com/2008/05/moon-shadow-monday-fixed.html|accessdate=2008-09-27}}</ref> Namaka went through five occultations between May and June 2008.<ref name=shadows/> Mike Brown's team has calculated a better orbital solution for Namaka and think that the occultations might occur for a few more years.<ref name=brownblog/>


Hi{{okina}}iaka, at first nicknamed "Rudolph" by the Caltech team, was the first to be discovered, on January 26, 2005.<ref>{{cite journal|author= [[Michael E. Brown|M. E. Brown]], A. H. Bouchez, D. Rabinowitz. R. Sari, C. A. Trujillo, M. van Dam, R. Campbell, J. Chin, S. Hardman, E. Johansson, R. Lafon, D. Le Mignant, P. Stomski, D. Summers, and P. Wizinowich|title=Keck Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Discovery and Characterization of a Satellite to the Large Kuiper Belt Object 2003 EL<sub>61</sub>|journal=The Astrophysical Journal Letters|volume=632|date=2005-09-02|pages=L45–L48|url=http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/497641|doi=10.1086/497641}}</ref> It is the outer and larger of the two (at around 310&nbsp;km), and orbits Haumea every 49&nbsp;days.<ref name=blitzen>{{cite journal|title=Satellites of the largest Kuiper belt objects|author=M. E. Brown, M. A. van Dam, A. H. Bouchez et. al.|date=2005-10-02|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=639|pages=43–46|url=http://web.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/papers/ps/gab.pdf|accessdate=2009-09-29|doi=10.1086/501524}}</ref> Strong absorption features at 1.5 and 2 [[micrometre]]s in the [[infrared]] spectrum are consistent with water ice; their strength, greater than that of any other body in the Solar System,<ref name="Barkume2006"/> suggests that water ice covers much of the surface.<ref name="Barkume2006">{{cite journal|author=K. M Barkume, [[Michael E. Brown|M. E. Brown]], and E. L. Schaller|title=Water Ice on the Satellite of Kuiper Belt Object 2003 EL<sub>61</sub>|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|volume=640|date=March 2006|pages=L87–L89|url=http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601534 preprint|doi=10.1086/503159}}</ref> The unusual spectrum, along with similar absorption lines on Haumea, led Brown ''et. al.'' to conclude that capture was an unlikely model for the system's formation, and that the Haumean moons must be fragments of Haumea itself.<ref name=largest/>
World consumption of iron ore grows 10% per annum on average with the main consumers being China, Japan, Korea, the United States and the European Union.


Namaka, nicknamed "Blitzen" by the Caltech team,<ref>{{cite web|author=Kenneth Chang|title=Piecing Together the Clues of an Old Collision, Iceball by Iceball |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/20/science/space/20kuip.html |work=[[New York Times]] |publisher= |date=2007-03-20 |accessdate=2008-10-12 }}</ref> is the smaller, inner satellite of Haumea. It orbits Haumea in roughly 34 days, assuming a [[orbital eccentricity|circular orbit]].<ref name=blitzen/> Its discovery was announced on November 7, 2005. It is inclined approximately 40° from the larger moon.<ref name=blitzen/> Assuming a similar surface composition to the larger moon, its brightness implies a diameter 12% that of Haumea, or some 170&nbsp;km.<ref name="Johnston">{{cite web|url=http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/astmoons/am-136108.html|author=Wm. Robert Johnston |title=(136108) Haumea, Hi'iaka, and Namaka |date=2008-09-17 |accessdate=2008-09-29 }}</ref>
China is currently the largest consumer of iron ore, which translates to be the world's largest steel producing country. China is followed by Japan and Korea, which consume a significant amount of raw iron ore and metallurgical coal. In 2006, China produced 588 million tons of iron ore, with an annual growth of 38%.


== Depletion ==
== Collisional family ==
{{main|Haumea family}}
Iron ore reserves at present seem quite vast, but some are starting to suggest that the maths of continual exponential increase in consumption can even make this resource seem quite finite. For instance, [[Lester Brown]] of the [[Worldwatch Institute]] has suggested iron ore could run out within 64 years based on an ''extremely conservative'' extrapolation of 2% growth per year.<ref name="Brown">Brown, Lester ''Plan B 2.0'', New York: W.W. Norton, 2006. p. 109</ref>
Haumea is the largest member of a TNO collisional family, similar to [[asteroid family|asteroid families]]: a group of objects with similar orbital parameters and common physical characteristics, presumably with a common origin in a disruptive impact of the progenitor object of Haumea.<ref name="BrownBarkume2007">{{cite journal |author=Michael E. Brown, Kristina M. Barkume; Darin Ragozzine; Emily L. Schaller |date=2007-01-19|title=A collisional family of icy objects in the Kuiper belt |journal=Nature |volume=446 |issue=7133 |pages=294–296 |doi=10.1038/nature05619 |url= |accessdate=2008-09-27}}</ref> This family is the first to be identified among TNOs and includes—beside Haumea and its moons—{{mpl|(55636) 2002 TX|300}} (~600 km), {{mpl|(24835) 1995 SM|55}} (< 700 km), {{mpl|(19308) 1996 TO|66}} (~500 km), {{mpl|(120178) 2003 OP|32}} (< 700 km), and {{mpl|(145453) 2005 RR|43}} (< 700 km).<ref name=candidate/>


The presence of the collisional family could imply that Haumea and its "offspring" might have originated in the [[scattered disc]]. In today's sparsely populated Kuiper belt, the chance of such a collision occurring is less than 0.1 percent.<ref name=disc/> The family could not have formed in the denser primordial Kuiper belt because such a close-knit group would have been disrupted by [[Neptune#Formation and migration|Neptune's migration]] into the belt—the believed cause of the belt's current low density.<ref name=disc/> Therefore it appears likely that the dynamic scattered disc region, in which the possibility of such a collision is far higher, is the place of origin for the object that generated Haumea and its kin.<ref name=disc>{{cite journal|title=On a Scattered Disc Origin for the {{mp|2003 EL|61}} Collisional Family— an Example of the Importance of Collisions in the Dynamics of Small Bodies|author=Harold F. Levison, Alessandro Morbidelli, David Vokrouhlický and William F. Bottke|date=2008-04-14|journal= The Astronomical Journal|volume= 136|pages= 1079–1088| doi= 10.1088/0004-6256/136/3/1079|url=http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1538-3881/136/3/1079|accessdate=2008-09-19}}</ref>
==Smelting==
{{Main|blast furnace|bloomery}}
Iron ore consists of [[oxygen]] and iron atoms bonded together into molecules. To convert it to metallic iron it must be [[smelting|smelted]] or sent through a [[Direct reduced iron|direct reduction]] process to remove the oxygen. Oxygen-iron bonds are strong, and to remove the iron from the oxygen, a stronger elemental bond must be presented to attach to the oxygen. Carbon is used because the strength of a [[carbon-oxygen bond]] is greater than that of the iron-oxygen bond, at high temperatures. Thus, the iron ore must be powdered and mixed with [[coke (fuel)|coke]], to be burnt in the smelting process.


Because it would have taken at least a billion years for the group to have diffused as far as it has, the collision which created the Haumea family is believed to have occurred very early in the Solar System's history.<ref name=candidate>{{cite journal|title=Candidate Members and Age Estimate of the Family of Kuiper Belt Object {{mp|2003 EL|61}}|author=D. Ragozzine; M. E. Brown|journal=The Astronomical Journal|volume=134|issue=6|pages= 2160–2167|date=2007-09-04|url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007arXiv0709.0328R|accessdate=2008-09-19|doi=10.1086/522334}}</ref>
However, it is not entirely as simple as that; [[carbon monoxide]] is the primary ingredient of chemically stripping oxygen from iron. Thus, the iron and carbon smelting must be kept at an oxygen deficient reduced state to promote burning of carbon to produce CO not CO<sub>2</sub>.
:Air blast and charcoal (coke): 2C + O<sub>2</sub> <math>\to</math> 2CO.
:Carbon monoxide (CO) is the principal reduction agent.
::Stage One: 3Fe<sub>2</sub> O<sub>3</sub> + CO <math>\to</math> 2Fe<sub>3</sub> O<sub>4</sub> + CO<sub>2</sub>
::Stage Two: Fe<sub>3</sub> O<sub>4</sub> + CO <math>\to</math> 3Fe O + CO<sub>2</sub>
::Stage Three: FeO + CO <math>\to</math> Fe + CO<sub>2</sub>
:Limestone fluxing chemistry: CaCO<sub>3</sub> <math>\to</math> CaO + CO<sub>2</sub>

===Trace Elements:Effects and Remedies===
The inclusion of even small amounts of some elements can have profound effects on the behavioral characteristics of a batch of iron or the operation of a smelter. These effects can be both good and bad. Some catastrophically bad. Some chemicals were deliberately added. The addition of a flux made a blast furnace more efficient. Others were added because they made the iron more fluid, harder, or some other desirable quality. The choice of ore, fuel, and flux determined how the slag behaved and the operational characteristics of the iron produced. Ideally iron ore contains only iron and oxygen. In nature this is rarely the case. Typically, iron ore contains a host of elements which are often unwanted in modern steel.

====Silicon====
Silica (SiO2) is almost always present in iron ore. Most of it is slagged off during the smelting process. But, at temperatures above 1300 °C some will be reduced and form an alloy with the iron. The hotter the furnace, the more silicon will be present in the iron. It is not uncommon to find up to 1.5% Si in European cast iron from the 16th to 18th centuries.
The major effect of silicon is to promote the formation of gray iron. Gray iron is less brittle and easier to finish than white iron. It was preferred for casting purposes for this reason. Turner (1900:192-7) reported that silicon also reduced shrinkage and the formation of blowholes, lowering the number of bad castings.

====Phosphorus====
Phosphorus (P) has four major effects on iron: increased hardness and strength, lower solidus temperature, increased fluidity, and cold shortness. Depending on the use intended for the iron, these effects are either good or bad. Bog ore often has a high Phosphorus content (Gordon 1996:57).

The strength and hardness of iron increases with the concentration of phosphorus. 0.05% phosphorus in wrought iron makes it as hard as medium carbon steel. High phosphorus iron can also be hardened by cold hammering. The hardening effect is true for any concentration of phosphorus. The more phosphorus, the harder the iron becomes and the more it can be hardened by hammering. Modern steel makers can increase hardness by as much as 30%, without sacrificing shock resistance by maintaining phosphorus levels between 0.07 and 0.12%. It also increases the depth of hardening due to quenching, but at the same time also decreases the solubility of carbon in iron at high temperatures. This would decrease its usefulness in making blister steel (cementation), where the speed and amount of carbon absorption is the overriding consideration.

The addition of phosphorus has a down side. At concentrations higher than 0.2% iron becomes increasingly cold short, or brittle at low temperatures. Cold short is especially important for bar iron. Although, bar iron is usually worked hot, its uses often require it to be tough, bendable, and resistant to shock at room temperature. A nail that shattered when hit with a hammer or a carriage wheel that broke when it hit a rock would not sell well. High enough concentrations of phosphorus render any iron unusable (Rostoker and Bronson 1990:22). The effects of cold shortness are magnified by temperature. Thus, a piece of iron that is perfectly serviceable in summer, might become extremely brittle in winter. There is some evidence that during the Middle Ages the very wealthy may have had a high phosphorus sword for summer and a low phosphorus sword for winter (Rostoker and Bronson 1990:22).

Careful control of phosphorus can be of great benefit in casting operations. Phosphorus depresses the liquidus temperature, allowing the iron to remain molten for longer and increases fluidity. The addition of 1% can double the distance molten iron will flow (Rostoker and Bronson 1990:22). The maximum effect, about 500 °C, is achieved at a concentration of 10.2% (Rostocker and Bronson 1990:194). For foundry work Turner felt the ideal iron had 0.2-0.55% phosphorus. The resulting iron filled molds with fewer voids and also shrank less. In the 19th century some producers of decorative cast iron used iron with up to 5% phosphorus. The extreme fluidity allowed them to make very complex and delicate castings. But, they could not be weight bearing, as they had no strength (Turner 1900:202-4).

There are two remedies for high phosphorus iron. The oldest, and easiest, was avoidance. If the iron your ore produced was cold short, you found a new source of ore. The second method involves oxidizing the phosphorus during the fining process by adding iron oxide. The technique is usually associated with puddling in the 19th century, and may not have been understood earlier. For instance Isaac Zane, the owner of Marlboro Iron Works did not appear to know about it in 1772. Given Zane's reputation for keeping abreast of the latest developments, the technique was probably unknown to the ironmasters of Virginia and Pennsylvania.

[[Phosphorus]] is a deleterious contaminant because it makes steel brittle, even at concentrations of as little as 0.5%. Phosphorus cannot be easily removed by fluxing or smelting, and so iron ores must generally be low in phosphorus to begin with. The [[Iron pillar of Delhi|iron pillar]] of India which does not rust is protected by a phosphoric composition. [[Phosphoric acid]] is used at a rust converter because phosphoric iron is less susceptible to oxidation.

====Aluminium====
Small amounts of [[aluminium]] (Al) are present in many ores (often as clay) and some limestone. The former can be removed by washing the ore prior to smelting. Until the introduction of brick lined furnaces the amounts are small enough that they do not have an effect on either the iron or slag. However, when brick is used for hearths and the interior of blast furnaces, the amount of aluminium increases dramatically. This is due to the erosion of the furnace lining by the liquid slag,

Aluminium is very hard to reduce. As a result aluminium contamination of the iron is not a problem. However, it does increase the viscosity of the slag (Kato and Minowa 1969:37 and Rosenqvist 1983:311). This will have a number of adverse effects on furnace operation. The thicker slag will slow the descent of the charge, prolonging the process. High aluminium will also make it more difficult to tap off the liquid slag. At the extreme this could lead to a frozen furnace.

There are a number of solutions to a high aluminium slag. the first is avoidance, don't use ore or a lime source with a high aluminium content. Increasing the ratio of lime flux will decrease the viscosity (Rosenqvist 1983:311).

====Sulfur====
[[Sulfur]] (S) is a frequent contaminant in coal. It is also present in small quantities in many ores, but would be removed by [[calcining]]. Sulfur dissolves readily in both liquid and solid iron at the temperatures present in iron smelting. The effects of even small amounts of sulfur are immediate and serious. They were one of the first worked out by iron makers. Sulfur causes iron to be red or hot short (Gordon 1996:7).

Hot short iron is brittle when hot. This was a serious problem as most iron used during the 17th and 18th century was bar or wrought iron. Wrought iron is shaped by repeated blows with a hammer while hot. A piece of hot short iron will crack if worked with a hammer. When a piece of hot iron or steel cracks the exposed surface immediately oxidizes. This layer of oxide prevents the mending of the crack by welding. Large cracks cause the iron or steel to break up. Smaller cracks can cause the object to fail during use. The degree of hot shortness is in direct proportion to the amount of sulfur present. Today iron with over 0.03% sulfur is avoided.

Hot short iron can be worked, but it has to be worked at low temperatures. Working at lower temperatures requires more physical effort from the smith or forgeman. the metal must be struck more often and harder to achieve the same result. A mildly sulfur contaminated bar could be worked, but it required a great deal more time and effort.

In cast iron sulfur promotes the formation of white iron. As little as 0.5% can counteract the effects of slow cooling and a high silicon content (Rostoker and Bronson 1990:21). White cast iron is more brittle, but also harder. It was generally avoided, because it was difficult to work. Except in China where high sulfur cast iron, some as high as 0.57%, made with coal and coke, was used to make bells and chimes (Rostoker, Bronson, and Dvorak 1984:760). According to Turner (1900:200), good foundry iron should have less than 0.15% sulfur. In the rest of the world a high sulfur cast iron could be used for making castings, but would make poor wrought iron.

There are a number of remedies for sulfur contamination. The first, and the one most used in historic and prehistoric operations, was avoidance. Coal was not used in Europe (unlike China) as a fuel for smelting because it contained sulfur and caused hot short iron. If an ore resulted in hot short metal, [[ironmaster]]s found another ore. When mineral coal was first used in European blast furnaces in 1709 (or perhaps earlier), it was [[coke (fuel)|coked]]. Only with the introduction of [[hot blast]] from 1829 was raw coal used.

Sulfur can be removed from ores by roasting and washing. Roasting oxidizes sulfur YOUR SUCK PENIS to form [[sulfur dioxide]] which either escapes into the atmosphere or can be washed out. In warm climates it was possible to leave pyritic ore out in the rain. The combined action of rain, bacteria, and heat oxidize the sulfides to sulfates, which are water soluble (Turner 1900:77). However, historically (at least) iron sulfide ([[iron pyrite]], FeS<sub>2</sub>), though a common iron mineral has not been used an ore for the production of metal. Natural weathering was also used in Sweden. The same process, at geological speed, results in the [[gossan]] limonite ores.

The importance attached to low sulfur iron is demonstrated by the consistently higher prices paid for the iron of Sweden, Russia, and Spain from the 16th to 18th centuries. Today sulfur is no longer a problem. The modern remedy is the addition of [[manganese]]. But, the operator must know how much sulfur is in the iron because at least five times as much manganese must be added to neutralize it. Some historic irons display manganese levels, but most are well below the level needed to neutralize sulfur (Rostoker and Bronson 1990:21).


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Reflist|2}}
* Gordon, Robert B. (1996). ''American Iron 1607-1900''. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
* Rostoker, William and Bennet Bronson (1990). ''Pre-Industrial Iron: Its Technology and Ethnology''. Archeomaterials Monograph No. 1.
* Turner, Thomas (1900). ''The Metallurgy of Iron''. 2nd Edition. Charles Griffin & Company, Limited.
* Kato, Makoto and Susumu Minowa (1969). 'Viscosity Measurement of Molten Slag- Properties of Slag at Elevated Temperature (Part 1)'. ''Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan'' Vol. 9:31-38. Nihon Tekko Kyokai, Tokyo.
* Rosenqvist, Terkel (1983). ''Principles of Extractive Metallurgy''. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
* Rostoker, William, Bennet Bronson, and James Dvorak (1984). 'The Cast-Iron Bells of China'. ''Technology and Culture'' 25(4):750-67. The Society for the History of Technology.


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/orbits/2003el61.html NASA visualization of Haumea's orbit]
* [http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/astmoons/am-136108.html Updated data]
*S.C. Tegler, W. Grundy, W. Romanishin, G. Consolmagno, K. Mogren, F. Vilas: ''Optical Spectroscopy of the Large Kuiper Belt Objects 136472 ({{mp|2005 FY|9}}) and 136108 ({{mp|2003 EL|61}}).'' [http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0611135 Preprint]


{{Solar System}}
* [http://web.ulib.csuohio.edu/SpecColl/glihc/articles/carrhist.html History of the Iron Ore Trade on the Great Lakes]
{{Haumea}}
* [http://www.lastgreatplaces.org/berkshire/history/art6162.html United States Colonial Iron Ore Industry]
{{MinorPlanets Navigator|(136107) 2003 EY58|(136109) 2003 FA22|PageName=(136108) Haumea|state=autocollapse}}
* [http://www.archive.org/details/pioneersofclevel00jeaniala "Pioneers of the Cleveland iron trade" by J. S. Jeans 1875]
{{Trans-Neptunian objects}}
* [http://www.abandonedmines.net Iron Mines of NY/NJ]
{{Trans-Neptunian dwarf planets}}


[[Category:Economic geology]]
[[Category:Discoveries by Michael E. Brown|Haumea]]
[[Category:Iron|Ore]]
[[Category:Discoveries by Chad Trujillo|Haumea]]
[[Category:Mining]]
[[Category:Discoveries by David L. Rabinowitz|Haumea]]
[[Category:Resource extraction]]
[[Category:2004 in science]]
[[Category:Haumea| ]]


[[bn:হাউমেইয়া (বামন গ্রহ)]]
[[be:Жалезныя руды]]
[[be:2003 EL61 (аб'ект поясу Койпера)]]
[[cs:Železná ruda]]
[[da:Jernmalm]]
[[ca:2003 EL61]]
[[de:Eisenerz]]
[[cs:Haumea (plutoid)]]
[[da:Haumea (dværgplanet)]]
[[et:Rauamaak]]
[[de:Haumea (Zwergplanet)]]
[[fr:Minerai de fer]]
[[et:Haumea (kääbusplaneet)]]
[[os:Æфсæнæрзæт]]
[[it:Minerali ferrosi]]
[[el:2003 ΕL61]]
[[lb:Minette (Geologie)]]
[[es:(136108) Haumea]]
[[lt:Geležies rūda]]
[[fr:(136108) Haumea]]
[[nl:IJzererts]]
[[ko:하우메아]]
[[id:Haumea (planet katai)]]
[[ja:鉄鉱石]]
[[it:Haumea (astronomia)]]
[[no:Jernmalm]]
[[he:האומיה (כוכב לכת ננסי)]]
[[nn:Jernmalm]]
[[ka:ჰაუმეა]]
[[pt:Minério de ferro]]
[[la:Haumea (planetula)]]
[[ru:Железная руда]]
[[sk:Železná ruda]]
[[hu:Haumea]]
[[fi:Rautamalmi]]
[[nl:Haumea]]
[[ja:ハウメア (準惑星)]]
[[sv:Järnmalm]]
[[no:Haumea]]
[[uk:Залізні руди]]
[[zh:铁矿]]
[[nn:136108 Haumea]]
[[pl:136108 Haumea]]
[[pt:Haumea]]
[[ru:Хаумеа (карликовая планета)]]
[[sk:136108 Haumea]]
[[sl:Haumea]]
[[sr:Хаумеа (патуљаста планета)]]
[[fi:Haumea]]
[[sv:Haumea (dvärgplanet)]]
[[tl:Haumea (duwendeng planeta)]]
[[th:เฮาเมอา]]
[[zh:小行星136108]]

Revision as of 23:11, 12 October 2008

Haumea
Artist's conception of Haumea,
with its moons, Hiʻiaka and Namaka
 
Discovery
Discovered byBrown et al.; Ortiz et al. (neither official)
Discovery date2004 December 28 (Brown et al.); 2005 July (Ortiz et al.)
Designations
Designation
(136108) Haumea
2003 EL61
dwarf planet, plutoid, TNO (cubewano?)[1][2]
fifth-order 12:7 resonance?[3]
Orbital characteristics[4]
Epoch 2005-08-18 (JD 2 453 600.5)
Aphelion7 708 Gm (51.526 AU)
Perihelion5 260 Gm (35.164 AU)
6 484 Gm (43.335 AU)
Eccentricity0.188 74
104 234 d (285.4 a)
4.484 km/s
198.07°
Inclination28.19°
121.90°
239.51°
Known satellites2
Physical characteristics
Dimensions~1960 × 1518 × 996 km[5]
(~1400 km)
1150 +250
−100
km[6]
Mass(4.2 ± 0.1)×1021 kg[7]
Mean density
2.6–3.3 g/cm³[5]
0.44 m/s²
0.84 km/s
0.163 14 ± 0.000 01 d
(3.915 4 ± 0.000 2 h)[8]
Albedo0.7 ± 0.1[5]
Temperature<50 K[9]
Spectral type
?
17.3 (opposition)[10]
0.17[4]

Haumea (Template:Pron-en how-MAY), formal designation (136108) Haumea, is a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt, one-third the mass of Pluto. It was discovered in 2004 by a team headed by Mike Brown at Caltech and the Mauna Kea Observatory in the United States, and in 2005 by a team headed by J. L. Ortiz at the Sierra Nevada Observatory in Spain, though the latter claim has been contested. On September 17, 2008, it was classified as a dwarf planet by the International Astronomical Union and named after Haumea, the Hawaiian goddess of childbirth.

Haumea is very unusual among the known trans-Neptunian objects especially due to its extreme elongation. Although its shape has not been directly observed, calculations from its light curve suggest it is an ellipsoid twice as long along its greatest axis as its shortest. Nonetheless, its gravity is believed sufficient for it to have relaxed into hydrostatic equilibrium, so it meets the definition of a dwarf planet. This elongation, along with other characteristics such as its unusually rapid rotation, high density, and high albedo—thought to be due to a layer of water ice on the surface—are thought to be the results of a giant collision, which left Haumea the largest member of a collisional family that includes its two known moons.

Classification

Haumea is classified as a dwarf planet, meaning that it is believed to be massive enough to have reached a state of hydrostatic equilibrium, but not enough to have cleared its neighborhood of similar objects. It orbits beyond Neptune, which together with being a dwarf planet defines it as a plutoid.[11] Since it is not proven to be in resonance with Neptune, nor likely capable of being significantly perturbed by it, Haumea was provisionally listed as a classical Kuiper belt object, the most numerous population of trans-Neptunian objects observed to date.[1] Although Haumea is thought to be far from spherical, it is considered a dwarf planet because its suspected ellipsoidal shape is the equilibrium state resulting from its rapid rotation—in much the same way that a water balloon stretches out when tossed with a spin—and is not due to Haumea having insufficient gravity to overcome the tensile strength of its material.[12] Indeed, Haumea is currently the best illustration that a body need not be spherical to be a planet or dwarf planet.

Name

Until it was given a permanent name, the Caltech discovery team used the nickname "Santa" among themselves, as they had discovered Haumea on December 28, 2004, just after Christmas.[13] On September 7, 2006, after the Spanish team announced the discovery to the Minor Planet Center (MPC) in July 2005, Haumea was given its first official label, the temporary designation (136108) 2003 EL61, with the "2003" based on the date of the Spanish discovery image.

Following guidelines established by the IAU that classical KBOs be given names of mythological beings associated with creation,[14] in September 2006 the Caltech team submitted formal names from Hawaiian mythology to the IAU for both (136108) 2003 EL61 and its moons, in order "to pay homage to the place where the satellites were discovered".[15] The names were proposed by David Rabinowitz of the Caltech team.[12] Haumea is the patron goddess of the island of Hawaiʻi, where the Mauna Kea Observatory is located. In addition, she is identified with Pāpā, the goddess of the earth and wife of Wākea (space),[16] which is appropriate because (136108) 2003 EL61 is thought to be composed almost entirely solid rock, without the thick ice mantle over a small rocky core typical of other known Kuiper belt objects.[17] Lastly, Haumea is the goddess of fertility and childbirth, with many children who sprang from different parts of her body;[16] this corresponds to the swarm of icy bodies thought to have broken off (136108) 2003 EL61 during an ancient collision. The two known moons, also believed to have been born in this manner, are thus named after two of Haumea's daughters, Hiʻiaka and Namaka.[17]

Discovery controversy

Two teams claim credit for the discovery of Haumea. Mike Brown and his team at Caltech discovered Haumea in December 2004 on images they had taken on May 6, 2004. On July 20, 2005, they published an online abstract of a report intended to announce the discovery at a conference in September 2005.[18] Around this time, José Luis Ortiz Moreno and his team at at the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía at Sierra Nevada Observatory in Spain, the found Haumea on images taken on March 7–10, 2003.[19] Ortiz emailed the MPC with their discovery on the night of July 27, 2005, giving a discovery date of March 7, 2003.[19]

Brown came to suspect the Spanish team of fraud upon learning that his observation logs were accessed from the Spanish observatory the day before the discovery announcement—logs which included enough information to allow the Ortiz team to precover Haumea in their 2003 images,—and then were accessed again just before Ortiz scheduled telescope time to obtain confirmation images for a second announcement to the MPC on July 29. Ortiz later admitted he had accessed the Caltech observation logs but denied any wrongdoing, stating he was merely verifying whether they had discovered a new object.[20]

IAU protocol is that discovery credit for a minor planet goes to whoever first submits a report to the MPC with enough positional data for a decent determination of its orbit, and that the credited discoverer has priority in choosing a name. However, the IAU announcement on September 17, 2008, that Haumea had been accepted as a dwarf planet, made no mention of a discoverer. The location of discovery was listed as the Sierra Nevada Observatory of the Spanish team,[11][21] but the chosen name, Haumea, was the Caltech proposal.[19]

Orbit and rotation

Orbits of Haumea (yellow) and Pluto (red), relative to that of Neptune (grey)

Haumea has a typical orbit for a classical trans-Neptunian object, with an orbital period of 285 Earth years, a perihelion of 35 AU, and an orbital inclination of 28°.[4] The diagram at right shows the orbital position of Haumea in yellow, compared to Pluto in red and Neptune in grey, as of April 2006. Haumea passed aphelion in early 1992,[10] and is currently more than 50 AU from the Sun.

Haumea's orbit lies at a slightly higher inclination than the other members of its collisional family. This may be due to a possible 12:7 orbital resonance with Neptune. Such a resonance would have shifted its orbit over the course of the last billion years,[22] through the Kozai effect, which allows the exchange of an orbit's eccentricity for increased inclination.

With a visual magnitude of 17.5, Haumea is the third brightest object in the Kuiper belt after Pluto and Makemake.[5] However, since the planets and most of the small Solar System bodies still remain in a common orbital alignment, left after their formation in the primordial disk of the Solar System, most early surveys for distant objects[23] focused on the projection on the sky of this common plane, the ecliptic. As the region of sky close to the ecliptic became well explored, successive sky surveys began looking for objects that had been dynamically excited into orbits with higher inclinations, and also objects that were more distant, with slower mean motions across the sky.[24][25] This made possible the discovery of Haumea, with its high orbital inclination (65% greater than Pluto's 17°) and its current position far from the ecliptic.

Haumea rotates roughly once every four hours, faster than any other known equilibrium body in the Solar System and indeed faster than any known body larger than 100 km in diameter.[5] Its short rotation period is likely to have been caused by the same giant impact which created its satellites and its collisional family.[26]

Physical characteristics

Size, shape and composition

Error: Image is invalid or non-existent.

The only way to estimate the size of a small, isolated trans-Neptunian object is to use the body's optical magnitude and location, and assuming a value for its albedo. For larger, brighter objects, their thermal emission can also be measured, which gives direct evidence for the albedo.[6] The mass can only be crudely estimated by assuming a value for its density. However, the addition of a satellite allows the mass of the system to be calculated directly from the satellite's orbit using Kepler's third law. It the case of Haumea, the result is 4.2 × 1021 kg, or 28% the mass of the Plutonian system. Nearly all of this mass is in Haumea.[7]

The calculated ellipsoid shape of Haumea, 1960×1518×996 km. At left are the minimum and maximum equatorial silhouettes (1960×996 and 1518×996 km); at right is the view from the pole (1960×1518 km).

Haumea displays large fluctuations in brightness over a period of 4 hours, indicating that it rotates faster than any other large object known in the Solar system. The rotational physics of deformable bodies implies that over geological time, Haumea has been distorted into the equilibrium form of a scalene ellipsoid by this four-hour rotational period, and it is thought that the alternating display of side view–end view–side view causes most of the brightness fluctuation.[5] These fluctuations could also be partially due to a mottled surface.[8]

The rapid rotation and elongated shape, together with the well-defined mass provided by the existence of its moons, provide strong constraints on the composition of Haumea. Mass and volume are the requirements to calculate density — and the denser the object, the less elongate and more spherical it becomes, for a given rotational period. This constrains Haumea's density to around 2.6–3.3 g/cm³, a value typical of silicate minerals such as olivine and pyroxene, which from the element abundances in the solar nebula form the rock-dominated objects of the Solar System. For comparison, the Earth's moon, which is mostly rock, has a density of 3.3 g/cm³, while Pluto, a typical icy object in the Kuiper belt, has a density of 2.0 g/cm³. Models of Pluto's structure suggest that its lower mean density is due to a thick mantle of ice over a small rocky core. If Haumea had a density closer to that of Pluto, implying a Pluto-like composition, it would have an even greater elongate distortion. This suggests that Haumea has a substantial rocky content, with a thin ice veneer.[15] The original thick ice mantle with which it is likely to have formed may have been removed during the massive collision that formed Haumea's collisional family.[26]

The limits on mass and density place constrains on Haumea's possible dimensions.[5] The best fit to the data as of 2008 is that Haumea is approximately the diameter of Pluto along its longest axis and about half the diameter of Pluto at its poles. This would make it one of the largest trans-Neptunian objects discovered, and possibly fourth after Eris, Pluto, and Makemake. It would be larger than Sedna, Orcus, and Quaoar.[27]

Surface

In 2005, the Gemini and Keck telescopes obtained spectra of Haumea which showed strong crystalline water ice features similar to the surface of Pluto's moon Charon.[9] This is peculiar, because crystalline ice forms at temperatures above 110 K, and the surface temperature of Haumea is below 50 K, and at this temperature the energetically preferred form of ice is an amorphous structure.[9] In addition, the lattice structure of crystalline ice is unstable under the constant rain of energetic particles from the Sun and cosmic rays from other stars that strike trans-Neptunian objects.[9] The timescale for the crystalline ice to revert to amorphous ice under this bombardment is on the order of ten million years,[28] and trans-Neptunian objects have been in their present distant, cold-temperature locations for timescales close to the multi-billion year age of the Solar System.[22] Radiation damage should also redden and darken the surface of trans-Neptunian objects where the common surface materials of organic ices and tholin-like compounds are present. Therefore, the spectra and colour suggest Haumea and its family members have undergone resurfacing that produced fresh ice. However, no plausible resurfacing mechanism has been found to account for their apparent youth.[29]

Consistent with a surface of crystalline ice, Haumea is about as bright as snow, with an albedo greater than 0.6.[5] However, this unusually high albedo does not appear to be unique among large TNOs. Recent measurements of Eris imply an even higher (inferred) albedo of 0.86.[30] Surprisingly, 66% to 80% of the Haumean surface appears to be covered in pure crystalline ice, the remainder being material of unknown composition.[9]

Best fit modeling of the surface composition that would produce the observed spectra suggests that one strong contributor to the high albedo may be hydrogen cyanide or phyllosilicate clays.[9] Inorganic cyanide salts such as copper potassium cyanide may also be present.[9] In strong contrast to Makemake, the absence of a measurement of methane in the spectra means that no more than 10% of Haumea's surface could be covered in methane.[9]

One analysis of color variations in Haumea's light curve found shifts that could not be explained by its shape, suggesting that there is a region on the surface that differs both in color and albedo from the average.[8] Such surface variations have been found on Pluto,[31] but further light curve observations of Haumea would be needed to confirm if these also occur on Haumea.

Moons

File:2003 EL61.jpg
Keck image of Haumea and its two moons. Hiʻiaka is above Haumea (center), and Namaka is directly below.

Two small satellites have been discovered orbiting Haumea, (136108) Haumea I Hiʻiaka and (136108) Haumea II Namaka.[11] They were both discovered in 2005, through observations with the W.M. Keck Observatory by a team headed by Mike Brown at Caltech, only a few years after occultations of Hiʻiaka with Haumea in 1999. Hiʻiakan occultations will not happen again until 2138.[32] Namaka went through five occultations between May and June 2008.[32] Mike Brown's team has calculated a better orbital solution for Namaka and think that the occultations might occur for a few more years.[13]

Hiʻiaka, at first nicknamed "Rudolph" by the Caltech team, was the first to be discovered, on January 26, 2005.[33] It is the outer and larger of the two (at around 310 km), and orbits Haumea every 49 days.[34] Strong absorption features at 1.5 and 2 micrometres in the infrared spectrum are consistent with water ice; their strength, greater than that of any other body in the Solar System,[35] suggests that water ice covers much of the surface.[35] The unusual spectrum, along with similar absorption lines on Haumea, led Brown et. al. to conclude that capture was an unlikely model for the system's formation, and that the Haumean moons must be fragments of Haumea itself.[22]

Namaka, nicknamed "Blitzen" by the Caltech team,[36] is the smaller, inner satellite of Haumea. It orbits Haumea in roughly 34 days, assuming a circular orbit.[34] Its discovery was announced on November 7, 2005. It is inclined approximately 40° from the larger moon.[34] Assuming a similar surface composition to the larger moon, its brightness implies a diameter 12% that of Haumea, or some 170 km.[37]

Collisional family

Haumea is the largest member of a TNO collisional family, similar to asteroid families: a group of objects with similar orbital parameters and common physical characteristics, presumably with a common origin in a disruptive impact of the progenitor object of Haumea.[26] This family is the first to be identified among TNOs and includes—beside Haumea and its moons—(55636) 2002 TX300 (~600 km), (24835) 1995 SM55 (< 700 km), (19308) 1996 TO66 (~500 km), (120178) 2003 OP32 (< 700 km), and (145453) 2005 RR43 (< 700 km).[3]

The presence of the collisional family could imply that Haumea and its "offspring" might have originated in the scattered disc. In today's sparsely populated Kuiper belt, the chance of such a collision occurring is less than 0.1 percent.[38] The family could not have formed in the denser primordial Kuiper belt because such a close-knit group would have been disrupted by Neptune's migration into the belt—the believed cause of the belt's current low density.[38] Therefore it appears likely that the dynamic scattered disc region, in which the possibility of such a collision is far higher, is the place of origin for the object that generated Haumea and its kin.[38]

Because it would have taken at least a billion years for the group to have diffused as far as it has, the collision which created the Haumea family is believed to have occurred very early in the Solar System's history.[3]

References

  1. ^ a b "MPEC 2008-O05 : Distant Minor Planets (2008 AUG. 2.0 TT)". Minor Planet Center. 2008-07-17. Retrieved 2008-09-27.(older provisional Cubewano listing)
  2. ^ Marc W. Buie (2008/06/25). "Orbit Fit and Astrometric record for 136108". SwRI (Space Science Department). Retrieved 2008-10-02. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ a b c D. Ragozzine; M. E. Brown (2007-09-04). "Candidate Members and Age Estimate of the Family of Kuiper Belt Object 2003 EL61". The Astronomical Journal. 134 (6): 2160–2167. doi:10.1086/522334. Retrieved 2008-09-19.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ a b c "JPL Small-Body Database Browser: 136108 Haumea ((2003 EL61)". NASA's JPL. 2008-05-10 last obs. Retrieved 2008-06-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h D. L. Rabinowitz, K. M. Barkume, M. E. Brown, H. G. Roe, M. Schwartz, S. W. Tourtellotte, C. A. Trujillo (2006). "Photometric Observations Constraining the Size, Shape, and Albedo of 2003 EL61, a Rapidly Rotating, Pluto-Sized Object in the Kuiper Belt". The Astrophysical Journal. 639 (2): 1238–1251. doi:10.1086/499575. {{cite journal}}: |format= requires |url= (help); External link in |format= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ a b John Stansberry, Will Grundy, Mike Brown, Dale Cruikshank, John Spencer, David Trilling, Jean-Luc Margot (2007-02-20). "Physical Properties of Kuiper Belt and Centaur Objects: Constraints from Spitzer Space Telescope". University of Arizona, Lowell Observatory, California Institute of Technology, NASA Ames Research Center, Southwest Research Institute, Cornell University. Retrieved 2008-07-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ a b M. E. Brown, A. H. Bouchez, D. L. Rabinowitz, R. Sari, C. A. Trujillo, M. A. van Dam, R. Campbell, J. Chin, S. Hartman, E. Johansson, R. Lafon, D. LeMignant, P. Stomski, D. Summers, P. L. Wizinowich (October 2005). "Keck Observatory laser guide star adaptive optics discovery and characterization of a satellite to large Kuiper belt object 2003 EL61". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 632: L45. doi:10.1086/497641. {{cite journal}}: |format= requires |url= (help); External link in |format= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ a b c Pedro Lacerda, David Jewitt and Nuno Peixinho (2008-04-02). "High-Precision Photometry of Extreme KBO 2003 EL61". The Astronomical Journal. 135: 1749–1756. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1749. Retrieved 2008-09-22.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h Chadwick A. Trujillo, Michael E. Brown, Kristina Barkume, Emily Shaller, David Rabinowitz (February 2007). "The Surface of 2003 EL61 in the Near Infrared". The Astrophysical Journal. 655: 1172–1178. doi:10.1086/509861. {{cite journal}}: |format= requires |url= (help); External link in |format= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ a b "HORIZONS Web-Interface". JPL Solar System Dynamics. Retrieved 2008-07-02. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  11. ^ a b c "Dwarf Planets and their Systems". USGS Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. Retrieved 2008-09-17.
  12. ^ a b "IAU names fifth dwarf planet Haumea". IAU Press Release. 2008-09-17. Retrieved 2008-09-17.
  13. ^ a b Mike Brown (2008-09-17). "Haumea". Mike Brown's Planets. Retrieved 2008-09-22. (Namaka occultations)
  14. ^ "Naming of astronomical objects: Minor planets". International Astronomical Union. Retrieved 2008-11-17.
  15. ^ a b Mike Brown (2008-09-17). "Dwarf planets: Haumea". CalTech. Retrieved 2008-09-18.
  16. ^ a b Robert D. Craig (2004). Handbook of Polynesian Mythology. ABC-CLIO. p. 128.
  17. ^ a b "News Release - IAU0807: IAU names fifth dwarf planet Haumea". International Astronomical Union. 2008-09-17. Retrieved 2008-09-18.
  18. ^ Michael E Brown. "The electronic trail of the discovery of 2003 EL61". CalTech. Retrieved 2006-08-16.
  19. ^ a b c Pablo Santos Sanz (2008-26-09). "La historia de Ataecina vs Haumea" (in Spanish). infoastro.com. Retrieved 2008-09-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) Template:Es icon
  20. ^ Jeff Hecht (2005-09-21). "Astronomer denies improper use of web data". NewScientist.com. Retrieved 2006-08-16.
  21. ^ Rachel Courtland (2008-09-19). "Controversial dwarf planet finally named 'Haumea'". NewScientistSpace. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
  22. ^ a b c Michael E. Brown. "The largest Kuiper belt objects" (PDF). CalTech. Retrieved 2008-09-19.
  23. ^ C. A. Trujillo and M. E. Brown (June 2003). "The Caltech Wide Area Sky Survey. Earth Moon and Planets". 112: 92–99. doi:10.1023/B:MOON.0000031929.19729.a1. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |doi_brokendate= ignored (|doi-broken-date= suggested) (help)
  24. ^ Brown, M. E.; Trujillo, C.; Rabinowitz, D. L. (2004). "Discovery of a candidate inner Oort cloud planetoid". The Astrophysical Journal. 617 (1): 645–649. doi:10.1086/422095.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ Schwamb, M. E.; Brown, M. E.; Rabinowitz, D. L. (2008). "Constraints on the distant population in the region of Sedna". American Astronomical Society (DPS meeting \#40}, \#38.07).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. ^ a b c Michael E. Brown, Kristina M. Barkume; Darin Ragozzine; Emily L. Schaller (2007-01-19). "A collisional family of icy objects in the Kuiper belt". Nature. 446 (7133): 294–296. doi:10.1038/nature05619. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ J. Stansberry, W. Grundy, M. Brown; et al. (2008-04-17). "Physical Properties of Kuiper Belt and Centaur Objects: Constraints from Spitzer Space Telescope" (abstract). The Solar System beyond Neptune. University of Arizona Press. Retrieved 2008-08-04. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ^ "Charon: An ice machine in the ultimate deep freeze". Gemini Observatory. 2007-07-17. Retrieved 2007-07-18.
  29. ^ David L. Rabinowitz, Bradley E. Schaefer, Martha W. Schaefer, Suzanne W. Tourtellotte (2008-04-17). "The Youthful Appearance of the 2003 EL61 Collisional Family". ArXiv.org. Retrieved 2008-09-20.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. ^ M. E. Brown, E.L. Schaller, H.G. Roe, D. L. Rabinowitz, C. A. Trujillo (2006-02-08). "Direct measurement of the size of 2003 UB313 from the [[Hubble Space Telescope]]" (PDF). The Astronomical Journal. 643 (2): L61–L63. doi:10.1086/504843. {{cite journal}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. ^ Alan Boyle (1999-02-11). "Pluto regains its place on the fringe". MSNBC. Retrieved 2008-10-12. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  32. ^ a b Mike Brown (2008-05-18). "Moon shadow Monday (fixed)". publisher=Mike Brown's Planets. Retrieved 2008-09-27. {{cite web}}: Missing pipe in: |publisher= (help)
  33. ^ M. E. Brown, A. H. Bouchez, D. Rabinowitz. R. Sari, C. A. Trujillo, M. van Dam, R. Campbell, J. Chin, S. Hardman, E. Johansson, R. Lafon, D. Le Mignant, P. Stomski, D. Summers, and P. Wizinowich (2005-09-02). "Keck Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Discovery and Characterization of a Satellite to the Large Kuiper Belt Object 2003 EL61". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 632: L45–L48. doi:10.1086/497641.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ a b c M. E. Brown, M. A. van Dam, A. H. Bouchez; et al. (2005-10-02). "Satellites of the largest Kuiper belt objects" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal. 639: 43–46. doi:10.1086/501524. Retrieved 2009-09-29. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  35. ^ a b K. M Barkume, M. E. Brown, and E. L. Schaller (March 2006). preprint "Water Ice on the Satellite of Kuiper Belt Object 2003 EL61". The Astrophysical Journal. 640: L87–L89. doi:10.1086/503159. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. ^ Kenneth Chang (2007-03-20). "Piecing Together the Clues of an Old Collision, Iceball by Iceball". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-10-12.
  37. ^ Wm. Robert Johnston (2008-09-17). "(136108) Haumea, Hi'iaka, and Namaka". Retrieved 2008-09-29.
  38. ^ a b c Harold F. Levison, Alessandro Morbidelli, David Vokrouhlický and William F. Bottke (2008-04-14). "On a Scattered Disc Origin for the 2003 EL61 Collisional Family— an Example of the Importance of Collisions in the Dynamics of Small Bodies". The Astronomical Journal. 136: 1079–1088. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/3/1079. Retrieved 2008-09-19.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External links