Margaret Singer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added link to confusable term
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American psychologist and researcher (1921–2003)}}
{{For|the [[birth control]] activist |Margaret Sanger}}
{{For|the [[birth control]] activist |Margaret Sanger}}
{{distinguish|Margaret (singer)}}
{{distinguish|Margaret (singer)}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2012}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2012}}
{{Infobox scientist
{{Infobox scientist
| name = Margaret Singer
| name = Margaret Singer
| image = Margaret_Singer_Photograph.jpg
| image = Margaret_Singer_Photograph.jpg
| image_size =
| image_size =
| caption = Margaret Thaler Singer
| caption =
| birth_date = {{Birth date|1921|07|29}}
| birth_date = {{Birth date|1921|07|29}}
| birth_place = [[Denver, Colorado]], US
| birth_place = [[Denver, Colorado]], US
| death_date = {{Death date and age|2003|11|23|1921|07|29|mf=y}}
| death_date = {{Death date and age|2003|11|23|1921|07|29|mf=y}}
| death_place = [[Berkeley, California]], US
| death_place = [[Berkeley, California]], US
| field = [[Clinical psychology]]
| field = [[Clinical psychology]]
| work_institution = [[University of California, Berkeley]]
| workplaces = {{ubl|[[University of Colorado]]|[[Walter Reed Army Medical Center]]}}
| alma_mater = [[University of Denver]], BA, MS<br />[[University of Denver]], PhD
| workplaces = [[American Family Foundation]], [[Cult Awareness Network]]
| alma_mater = [[University of Denver]], BA, MS<br />[[University of Denver]], PhD
| doctoral_students = [[Jesse S. Miller]]
| doctoral_students = [[Jesse S. Miller]]
| known_for = ''[[Cults in Our Midst]]'', ''[[Crazy Therapies]]''
| known_for = ''[[Cults in Our Midst]]'', ''[[Crazy Therapies]]''
| spouse = Jerome R. Singer<ref>{{cite web |url=https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~jsinger/biography.html |title=Biography |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2007-01-03 |website= berkeley.edu|publisher=University of California |access-date=2019-06-12 }}</ref>
| spouse = Jerome R. Singer<ref>{{cite web |url=https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~jsinger/biography.html |title=Biography |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=2007-01-03 |website= berkeley.edu|publisher=University of California |access-date=2019-06-12 }}</ref>
| children = 2
| children = [[Sam Singer (public relations)|Sam Singer]]<ref>https://www.sfweekly.com/news/trust-me-who-are-you-gonna-believe-sam-singer-or-your-own-eyes/</ref>
}}
}}


'''Margaret Thaler Singer''' (July 29, 1921 – November 23, 2003) was an American [[clinical psychologist]] and researcher with her colleague [[Lyman Wynne]] of family communication.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.isps.org/index.php/isps-membership/isps-honorary-members/item/56-lyman-wynne|title=Lyman Wynne|work=isps.org}}</ref> She was a prominent figure in the study of undue influence in social and religious contexts. She was among the world's foremost experts on the psychology of cults.
'''Margaret Thaler Singer''' (July 29, 1921 – November 23, 2003) was an American [[clinical psychologist]] and researcher with her colleague [[Lyman Wynne]] on family communication.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.isps.org/index.php/isps-membership/isps-honorary-members/item/56-lyman-wynne|title=Lyman Wynne|work=isps.org}}</ref> She was a prominent figure in the study of undue influence in social and religious contexts, and a proponent of the [[brainwashing]] theory of [[New religious movement|new religious movements]].


Singer's main areas of research included [[schizophrenia]], [[family therapy]], [[brainwashing]] and [[coercive persuasion]]. In the 1960s she began to study the nature of social and religious group influence and [[mind control]], and sat as a board member of the [[American Family Foundation]] and as an advisory board member of the [[Cult Awareness Network]]. She was the co-author of the book ''[[Cults in Our Midst]]''.
Singer's main areas of research included [[schizophrenia]], [[family therapy]], brainwashing and [[coercive persuasion]]. In the 1960s, she began to study the nature of social and religious group influence and [[mind control]], and sat as a board member of the [[American Family Foundation]] and as an advisory board member of the [[Cult Awareness Network]]. She was the co-author of the book ''[[Cults in Our Midst]]''.


== Education ==
== Education ==
Singer was born in [[Denver, Colorado]], to Margaret McDonough Thaler and Raymond Willard Thaler.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Singer|first=Margaret Thaler|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/31170479|title=Cults in our midst|others=Lalich, Janja,, Lifton, Robert Jay, 1926-|year=1994|isbn=0-7879-0051-6|edition=First|location=San Francisco|pages=XIV|oclc=31170479}}</ref> Her mother was a secretary to a federal judge and her father was chief operating engineer at the [[United States Mint#Denver|US Mint]].<ref name="McLellan2003" /> While attending the [[University of Denver]], she played [[cello]] in the Denver Civic Symphony.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> She received her [[Bachelor of Arts]] in speech and a [[Master of Science]] in [[Speech–language pathology|speech pathology]] and [[special education]] from the [[University of Denver]].<ref name="McLellan2003" /> Singer received her [[Doctor of Philosophy]] (PhD) degree in [[clinical psychology]] from the [[University of Denver]] in 1943.<ref name="Lancet">{{cite journal|last1=Oransky|first1=Ivan|title=Margaret Thaler Singer Obituary|journal=The Lancet|date=January 2004|volume=363|issue=9406|page=403|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15460-3|pmid=15124608|s2cid=40822752|doi-access=free}}</ref>

Singer was born in [[Denver, Colorado]] to Margaret McDonough Thaler and Raymond Willard Thaler.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Singer|first=Margaret Thaler|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/31170479|title=Cults in our midst|others=Lalich, Janja,, Lifton, Robert Jay, 1926-|year=1994|isbn=0-7879-0051-6|edition=First|location=San Francisco|pages=XIV|oclc=31170479}}</ref> Her mother was a secretary to a federal judge and her father was chief operating engineer at the [[United_States_Mint#Denver|US Mint]].<ref name="McLellan2003" /> While attending the University of Denver, she played cello in the Denver Civic Symphony.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> She received her [[Bachelor of Arts]] in speech and a [[Master of Science]] in speech pathology and special education from the [[University of Denver]].<ref name="McLellan2003" /> Singer received her [[Doctor of Philosophy]] (PhD) degree in [[clinical psychology]] from the [[University of Denver]] in 1943.<ref name="Lancet">{{cite journal|last1=Oransky|first1=Ivan|title=Margaret Thaler Singer Obituary|journal=The Lancet|date=January 2004|volume=363|issue=9406|page=403|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15460-3|pmid=15124608|s2cid=40822752|url=http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(04)15460-3/fulltext|access-date=20 February 2015}}</ref>


== Career ==
== Career ==
After obtaining her PhD in clinical psychology, Singer worked at the [[University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center|University of Colorado]]'s [[Medical School|School of Medicine]]'s department of psychiatry for eight years.<ref name="Lancet" /> In 1953, she started working at [[Walter Reed Army Medical Center]], where she specialized in studying the returned [[Prisoner of war|prisoners of war]] who had been [[Brainwashing|brainwashed]] by their captors into denouncing the [[United States]] and supporting [[North Korea]] and [[China]].<ref name="McLellan2003" />


In the scientific community, Singer was best known and respected for her studies in [[schizophrenia]] and [[family therapy]].<ref name="arti_Marg">{{Cite web
After obtaining her PhD in clinical psychology, Singer worked at the [[University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center|University of Colorado]]'s [[Medical School|School of Medicine]]'s department of psychiatry for eight years.<ref name="Lancet" /> In 1953 she started working at [[Walter Reed Army Medical Center]], where she specialized in studying the returned prisoners of war who had been brainwashed by their captors into denouncing the United States and supporting North Korea and China.<ref name="McLellan2003" />

In the scientific community, Singer was best known and respected for her studies in schizophrenia and family therapy.<ref name="arti_Marg">{{Cite web
| title = Margaret Singer, Expert On Cults, Brainwashing
| title = Margaret Singer, Expert On Cults, Brainwashing
| work = Sun Sentinel
| work = Sun Sentinel
Line 39: Line 37:
| access-date = 2015-02-20
| access-date = 2015-02-20
| url = http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2003-11-29/news/0311280481_1_group-s-revolutionary-ideology-cults-and-brainwashing-margaret-thaler-singer
| url = http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2003-11-29/news/0311280481_1_group-s-revolutionary-ideology-cults-and-brainwashing-margaret-thaler-singer
| archive-date = February 20, 2015
}}</ref> She conducted research with the [[National Institute of Mental Health]], the [[United States Air Force]], and the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]].<ref name="McLellan2003" /> Singer was a guest lecturer of [[psychology]] at [[UC Berkeley]] from 1964 to 1991, and she served as a faculty member and/or lecturer at other UC campuses as well as the [[Albert Einstein College of Medicine]], the [[University of Rochester]], and other institutions.<ref name="leading" />
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150220231834/http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2003-11-29/news/0311280481_1_group-s-revolutionary-ideology-cults-and-brainwashing-margaret-thaler-singer
| url-status = dead
}}</ref> She conducted research with the [[National Institute of Mental Health]], the [[United States Air Force]], and the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]].<ref name="McLellan2003" /> Singer was a guest lecturer of [[psychology]] at [[University of California, Berkeley]], from 1964 to 1991, and she served as a faculty member and lecturer at other [[University of California]] campuses as well as the [[Albert Einstein College of Medicine]], the [[University of Rochester]], and other institutions.<ref name="leading" />

Singer's work on family communication won her a place as one of the pioneers in the developing field of family therapy.<ref>Nichols, M., & Schwartz, R. (2005). Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods (7th Ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.</ref> As noted in one [[obituary]], her collaboration with [[Lyman Wynne]] was particularly important.


Singer began to study [[brainwashing]] in the 1950s at [[Walter Reed Army Medical Center|Walter Reed]] in [[Washington, D.C.|Washington, DC]], where she interviewed United States soldiers who had been taken prisoner during the [[Korean War]].<ref name="McLellan2003">{{Cite web
Singer's work on family communication won her a place as one of the pioneers in the developing field of family therapy.<ref>Nichols, M., & Schwartz, R. (2005). Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods (7th Ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.</ref> As noted in one obituary, her collaboration with Lyman Wynne was particularly important. "Lyman’s work with Margaret Singer on communication deviance (CD) of parents of patients with schizophrenia created a new method of analysis of thought disorders.<ref>http://www.isps.org/index.php/isps-membership/isps-honorary-members/item/56-lyman-wynne#sthash.9RlggagH.dpuf
</ref>
Singer began to study [[brainwashing]] in the 1950s at [[Walter Reed Army Medical Center|Walter Reed]] in Washington, DC, where she interviewed United States soldiers who had been taken prisoner during the [[Korean War]].<ref name="McLellan2003">{{Cite web
| title = Margaret Singer, 82; Expert on Brainwashing, Cults Testified at 1976 Trial of Patricia Hearst
| title = Margaret Singer, 82; Expert on Brainwashing, Cults Testified at 1976 Trial of Patricia Hearst
| author = McLellan, Dennis
| author = McLellan, Dennis
Line 57: Line 58:
| access-date = 2015-02-20
| access-date = 2015-02-20
| url = http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/PSYCH-SLEUTH-Margaret-Singer-has-made-history-3306807.php
| url = http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/PSYCH-SLEUTH-Margaret-Singer-has-made-history-3306807.php
}}</ref> Beginning in the late 1960s, she expanded her studies in the field of [[cult]]s and published a number of articles on [[mind control]] ("psychological coercion") and similar areas. She developed theories about how cults recruit and retain members (such as her Theory of Systematic Manipulation of Social and Psychological Influence) and was on the board of many of the major anti-cult groups and organizations in the US. At one point, Singer interviewed [[Charles Manson]].<ref name="Lilienfield">{{cite journal|last1=Lilienfeld|first1=Scott O.|title=In Memoriam: Dr. Margaret Thaler Singer|journal=The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice|date=23 November 2003|volume=3|issue=1}}</ref>
}}</ref> Beginning in the late 1960s, she expanded her studies in the field of [[cult]]s and published a number of articles on [[mind control]] ("psychological coercion") and similar areas. She developed theories about how cults recruit and retain members (such as her Theory of Systematic Manipulation of Social and Psychological Influence) and was on the board of many of the major [[Anti-cult movement|anti-cult]] groups and organizations in the United States. At one point, Singer interviewed [[Charles Manson]].<ref name="Lilienfield">{{cite journal|last1=Lilienfeld|first1=Scott O.|title=In Memoriam: Dr. Margaret Thaler Singer|journal=The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice|date=23 November 2003|volume=3|issue=1}}</ref>


By the 1970s Singer was a leading researcher in the field of psychosomatic medicine, and became the first female and first psychologist President of the American Psychosomatic Society in 1974.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret Thaler|title=Presidential Address|journal=Psychosomatic Medicine|date=February 1974|volume=36|issue=1|pages=1–17|doi=10.1097/00006842-197401000-00001|pmid=4810834}}</ref> She also served as a member of the [[Kaiser Permanente|Kaiser Foundation Research Institute]] review board and the [[American Family Foundation]] board.<ref name="sfgate.com">{{Cite web
By the 1970s, Singer was a leading researcher in the field of [[psychosomatic medicine]], and became the first female and first psychologist President of the American Psychosomatic Society in 1974.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret Thaler|title=Presidential Address|journal=Psychosomatic Medicine|date=February 1974|volume=36|issue=1|pages=1–17|doi=10.1097/00006842-197401000-00001|pmid=4810834}}</ref> She also served as a member of the [[Kaiser Permanente|Kaiser Foundation Research Institute]] review board and the [[American Family Foundation]] board.<ref name="sfgate.com">{{Cite web
| title = Margaret Singer -- expert on brainwashing
| title = Margaret Singer -- expert on brainwashing
| author = Rubenstein, Steve
| author = Rubenstein, Steve
Line 68: Line 69:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Singer testified as a brainwashing expert at the trial of [[Patty Hearst]], presenting her conclusions that Hearst had been brainwashed, but outside the jury's presence.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> Singer described Hearst as "a low-IQ, low-affect zombie" and testified that by using speech patterns, she determined that Hearst was reading statements prepared by her captors.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> Prosecutors argued that Singer's testimony should not be presented to the jury because brainwashing had never before been accepted as a field of expertise upon which expert testimony could be presented.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> The judge decided in favor of the prosecution, and Hearst was convicted.<ref name="McLellan2003"/> Singer's testimony was widely reported, which increased her reputation as a brainwashing expert.<ref name="McLellan2003" />
Singer testified as a brainwashing [[Expert witness|expert]] at the trial of [[Patty Hearst]], presenting her conclusions that Hearst had been brainwashed, but outside the [[jury]]'s presence.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> Singer described Hearst as "a low-[[Intelligence quotient|IQ]], low-affect [[zombie]]" and testified that by using speech patterns, she determined that Hearst was reading statements prepared by her captors.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> [[Prosecutor|Prosecutors]] argued that Singer's testimony should not be presented to the jury because brainwashing had never before been accepted as a field of expertise upon which expert testimony could be presented.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> The judge decided in favor of the prosecution, and Hearst was convicted.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> Singer's testimony was widely reported, which increased her reputation as a brainwashing expert.<ref name="McLellan2003" />


Singer played a role in the "[[Hillside Strangler]]" trial of [[Kenneth Bianchi]]. Singer concluded that Bianchi had faked symptoms of [[multiple personality disorder]], in order to escape responsibility for the murders of several women in Los Angeles.<ref name="Lilienfield" /> Later, she spoke about the trial on ''[[PBS Frontline]]'' in a special show entitled: "The Mind of a Murderer." Singer asserted that Bianchi was a [[psychopath]], and stated: "He may simply be evil."<ref name="Lilienfield" />
Singer played a role in the "[[Hillside Strangler]]" trial of [[Kenneth Bianchi]]. Singer concluded that Bianchi had faked symptoms of [[multiple personality disorder]], in order to escape responsibility for the murders of several women in [[Los Angeles]].<ref name="Lilienfield" /> Later, she spoke about the trial on ''[[PBS Frontline]]'' in a special show entitled: "The Mind of a Murderer." Singer asserted that Bianchi was a [[psychopath]], and stated: "He may simply be evil."<ref name="Lilienfield" />


Her expert testimony was no longer accepted after the report of the [[APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control]], of which she was chair, was rejected by the Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology (BSERP) of the [[American Psychological Association]].<ref>J. Gordon Melton, "Anti-cultists in the United States: An historical perspective," in ''New Religious Movements: Challenge and Response'', edited b Bryan R. Wilson and Jamie Cresswell, 213–33. London and New York: Routledge, 1999. p. 227.</ref> Melton has written that afterward, courts began to shift toward accepting the position held by the great majority of scholars studying [[new religious movement]]s, moving away from the minority perspective of Singer and others sympathetic to her brainwashing claims.<ref name="Gallagher">{{cite book|editor1-last=Gallagher|editor1-first=Eugene V.|editor2-last=Ashcraft|editor2-first=William Michael|title=Introduction to new and alternative religions in America|date=30 October 2006|publisher=Greenwood Press|location=Westport, Conn.|isbn=978-0275987121|page=137}}</ref> According to Melton, this had significant consequences later on, since it meant that brainwashing could no longer be used as a defense for the practice of [[deprogramming]].<ref name="Gallagher" />
An article by religious scholar [[J. Gordon Melton]] examines her court testimonies, noting ways these build on and differ from her professional publications by expanding from general assertions of social influence within "cults" to a more robust "Singer hypothesis" which leads directly to a "robot theory" of brainwashing.{{Citation needed|date=October 2020}} Melton has been described by his critics as a "defender" of organisations that they have labeled as being cults, including the Scientologists,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lermanet2.com/scientologynews/MarburgJournalofReligion092003-1.htm|title=Marburg Journal of Religion (September 2003)|work=lermanet2.com}}</ref> and briefly the Aum Shinrikyo cult after it conducted a sarin gas attack on the Tokyo Subway,<ref>"Tokyo Cult Finds an Unlikely Supporter", The Washington Post, T.R. Reid, May 1995.</ref> that Margaret Singer associated with undue influence in her book, Cults In Our Midst (2003).

Her expert testimony was no longer accepted after the report of the [[APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control]], of which she was chair, was rejected by the ''Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology'' (BSERP) of the [[American Psychological Association]].{{Citation needed|date=October 2020}} J. Gordon Melton has written that afterward, courts began to shift toward accepting the position held by the great majority of scholars studying [[new religious movement]]s, moving away from the minority perspective of Singer and others sympathetic to her brainwashing claims.<ref name="Gallagher">{{cite book|editor1-last=Gallagher|editor1-first=Eugene V.|editor2-last=Ashcraft|editor2-first=William Michael|title=Introduction to new and alternative religions in America|date=30 October 2006|publisher=Greenwood Press|location=Westport, Conn.|isbn=978-0275987121|page=137}}</ref> According to Melton, this had significant consequences later on, since it meant that brainwashing could no longer be used as a defense for the practice of [[deprogramming]].<ref name=Gallagher />


== DIMPAC task force controversy and aftermath ==
== DIMPAC task force controversy and aftermath ==
{{Main|APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control}}
{{Main|APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control}}


In the early 1980s, some US mental health professionals became well-known figures due to their involvement as expert witnesses in court cases against groups they considered to be cults. In their testimonies they presented theories of [[brainwashing]], [[mind control]], or [[coercive persuasion]] to support the legal positions of former group members against their former groups.
In the early 1980s, some American mental health professionals became well-known figures due to their involvement as [[Expert witness|expert witnesses]] in court cases against groups they considered to be [[Cult|cults]]. In their testimonies they presented theories of [[brainwashing]], [[mind control]], or [[coercive persuasion]] to support the legal positions of former group members against their former groups.


The [[American Psychological Association]] (APA) in 1983 asked Singer, who was one of the leading proponents of coercive persuasion theories, to chair a taskforce to investigate whether brainwashing or "coercive persuasion" did indeed play a role in recruitment by such groups. The task force was titled ''APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control'' (DIMPAC). The task force completed its final report in November 1986. In May 1987 the APA Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology (BSERP) rejected the DIMPAC final report, stating that the report "lack[ed] the scientific rigor and evenhanded critical approach necessary for APA [[imprimatur]]," and also stating that the BSERP did "not believe that we have sufficient information available to guide us in taking a position on this issue."{{Citation needed|date=October 2020}}
The [[American Psychological Association]] (APA) in 1983 asked Singer, who was one of the leading proponents of coercive persuasion theories, to chair a taskforce to investigate whether brainwashing or "coercive persuasion" did indeed play a role in recruitment by such groups. The task force was called the [[APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control]] (DIMPAC). The task force completed its final report in November 1986. In May 1987 the APA Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology (BSERP) rejected the DIMPAC final report, stating that the report "lack[ed] the scientific rigor and evenhanded critical approach necessary for APA [[imprimatur]]," and also stating that the BSERP did "not believe that we have sufficient information available to guide us in taking a position on this issue."<ref>{{Cite web |title=CESNUR - APA Memo of 1987 with Enclosures |url=https://www.cesnur.org/testi/APA.htm |access-date=2022-08-03 |website=www.cesnur.org}}</ref>


Singer and her professional associate, sociologist [[Richard Ofshe]], subsequently sued the APA, and a group of scholars and lawyers, in 1992 for "defamation, frauds, aiding and abetting and conspiracy,"<ref>''Dr. Margaret Singer and Dr. Richard Ofshe Sue Associations'', The Cult Observer, Vol. 9 No. 8, 1992</ref> and lost in 1994.<ref>Case No. 730012-8, Margaret Singer, et al., Plaintiff v. American Psychological Association, et. Al., Defendants <br />"This case, which involves claims of defamation, frauds, aiding and abetting and conspiracy, clearly constitutes a dispute over the application of the First Amendment to a public debate over matters both academic and professional."</ref> In a further ruling, James R. Lambden ordered Ofshe and Singer to pay $80,000 in attorneys' fees under California's [[SLAPP]]-suit law. At that time, Singer and Ofshe declared their intention to sue Michael Flomenhaft, the lawyer that represented them in the case, for malpractice.<ref>Allen. Charlotte, ''Brainwashed! Scholars of Cults Accuse Each Other of Bad Faith'', December 1998. [http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/9812/allen.html Available online]</ref>
Singer and her associate, sociologist [[Richard Ofshe]], subsequently sued the APA, and a group of scholars and lawyers, in 1992 for "[[defamation]], [[Fraud|frauds]], aiding and abetting and [[conspiracy]],"<ref>''Dr. Margaret Singer and Dr. Richard Ofshe Sue Associations'', The Cult Observer, Vol. 9 No. 8, 1992</ref> and lost in 1994.<ref>Case No. 730012-8, Margaret Singer, et al., Plaintiff v. American Psychological Association, et. Al., Defendants <br />"This case, which involves claims of defamation, frauds, aiding and abetting and conspiracy, clearly constitutes a dispute over the application of the First Amendment to a public debate over matters both academic and professional."</ref> In a further ruling, James R. Lambden ordered Ofshe and Singer to pay 80,000 [[United States dollar|USD]] in attorneys' fees under [[California]]'s [[SLAPP]]-suit law. At that time, Singer and Ofshe declared their intention to sue Michael Flomenhaft, the lawyer that represented them in the case, for [[Legal malpractice|malpractice]].<ref>Allen. Charlotte, ''Brainwashed! Scholars of Cults Accuse Each Other of Bad Faith'', December 1998. [http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/9812/allen.html Available online]</ref>


Singer was subsequently not accepted by judges as an expert witness in four cases alleging brainwashing and mind control.<ref>District of Columbia Court of Appeal, case 853 F.2d 948, Kropinski v. World Plan Executive Council.<br />"Kropinski failed to provide any evidence that Singer’s particular theory, namely that techniques of thought reform may be effective in the absence of physical threats or coercion, has a significant following in the scientific community, let alone general acceptance.</ref><ref>''Robin George v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California'', District Court of California Appeals, August 1989, case cited in Lewis, James R. ''The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements'', pp.194, {{ISBN|0-19-514986-6}}</ref><ref>Boyle, Robin A., ''Women, the Law, and Cults: Three Avenues of Legal Recourse—New Rape Laws, Violence Against Women Act, and Antistalking Laws'', Cultic Studies Journal, 15, 1–32. (1999) in reference to ''United States v. Fishman'', United States District Court of California, CR–88-0616; DLG CR 90 0357 DLG</ref><ref>''Jane Green and Patrick Ryan v. Maharishi Yogi'', US District Court, Washington, DC, March 13, 1991, Case #87-0015 OG</ref>
Singer was subsequently not accepted by judges as an expert witness in four cases alleging brainwashing and mind control.<ref>District of Columbia Court of Appeal, case 853 F.2d 948, Kropinski v. World Plan Executive Council.<br />"Kropinski failed to provide any evidence that Singer’s particular theory, namely that techniques of thought reform may be effective in the absence of physical threats or coercion, has a significant following in the scientific community, let alone general acceptance.</ref><ref>''Robin George v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California'', District Court of California Appeals, August 1989, case cited in Lewis, James R. ''The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements'', pp.194, {{ISBN|0-19-514986-6}}</ref><ref>Boyle, Robin A., ''Women, the Law, and Cults: Three Avenues of Legal Recourse—New Rape Laws, Violence Against Women Act, and Antistalking Laws'', Cultic Studies Journal, 15, 1–32. (1999) in reference to ''United States v. Fishman'', United States District Court of California, CR–88-0616; DLG CR 90 0357 DLG</ref><ref>''Jane Green and Patrick Ryan v. Maharishi Yogi'', US District Court, Washington, DC, March 13, 1991, Case #87-0015 OG</ref>
Line 90: Line 89:


==Landmark Education legal dispute (1996)==
==Landmark Education legal dispute (1996)==
In 1996, [[Landmark Education]] sued Singer for defamation.<ref>Drive through Deliverance, Phoenix New Times, October 19, 2000</ref> Singer mentioned Landmark Education in ''Cults in our Midst''; it was unclear whether she labeled Landmark Education as a cult or not. Singer issued a statement stating that she did not intend to call Landmark a cult, nor did she consider it a cult.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret|title=STATEMENT BY MARGARET SINGER|access-date=31 July 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080703170118/http://www.landmarkeducation.com/uploaded_files/694/msing.pdf|archive-date=July 3, 2008 |url=http://www.landmarkeducation.com/uploaded_files/694/msing.pdf}}</ref> Singer removed the references to Landmark Education from subsequent editions of the book. She also stated at deposition that she had "no personal, firsthand knowledge of Landmark or its programs."
In 1996, [[Landmark Education]] sued Singer for [[defamation]].{{ r | PNT_2000-10-19 }} Singer mentioned Landmark Education in ''[[Cults in Our Midst|Cults in our Midst]]''; it was unclear whether she labeled Landmark Education as a [[cult]] or not. Singer issued a statement stating that she did not intend to call Landmark a cult, nor did she consider it a cult.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret|title=STATEMENT BY MARGARET SINGER|access-date=31 July 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080703170118/http://www.landmarkeducation.com/uploaded_files/694/msing.pdf|archive-date=July 3, 2008 |url=http://www.landmarkeducation.com/uploaded_files/694/msing.pdf}}</ref> Singer removed the references to Landmark Education from subsequent editions of the book.


Amanda Scioscia reported in the ''[[Phoenix New Times]]'' that Singer never called Landmark a cult, but that she described it as a "controversial new age training course". She also stated that she would not recommend the group to anyone, and would not comment on whether Landmark used [[coercive persuasion]] for fear of legal recrimination from Landmark.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Scioscia|first1=Amanda|title=Drive-thru Deliverance|url=http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2000-10-19/news/feature_print.html|publisher=Phoenix Times|date=19 October 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061016160332/http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2000-10-19/news/feature_print.html|archive-date=October 16, 2006 }}</ref>
Amanda Scioscia reported in the ''[[Phoenix New Times]]'' that Singer never called Landmark a cult, but that she described it as a "controversial [[New Age|new age]] training course". She also stated that she would not recommend the group to anyone, and would not comment on whether Landmark used [[coercive persuasion]] for fear of legal [[recrimination]] from Landmark.<ref name=PNT_2000-10-19>{{cite news|last1=Scioscia|first1=Amanda|title=Drive-thru Deliverance|url=http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2000-10-19/news/feature_print.html|publisher=Phoenix Times|date=19 October 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061016160332/http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/2000-10-19/news/feature_print.html|archive-date=October 16, 2006 }}</ref>


== Harassment and death threat complaints ==
== Harassment and death threat complaints ==
Singer faced [[harassment]], including [[Death threat|death threats]] and dead animals placed on her doorstep, from groups that disagreed with her views on [[Cult|cults]].<ref name="McLellan2003"/><ref name="leading"/> According to [[Richard Behar]]'s article in ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine, Singer was an outspoken critic of [[Scientology]] and was known to travel under an assumed name to avoid harassment.<ref name="Behar1991">{{cite magazine|last1=Behar |first1=Richard |title=Scientology: 'Religion' a Thriving Cult of Greed, Power |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,972865-9,00.html |access-date=20 February 2015 |magazine=Time |date=6 May 1991 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070225132542/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C972865-9%2C00.html |archive-date=February 25, 2007 }}</ref>


Her criticism of cults and their [[brainwashing]] tactics resulted in harassment of Singer's family and students as well, including breaking into Singer's office, stealing students' term papers and sending notes to Singer's students.<ref name="sfga_PSYC"/> According to the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', other examples included cult "operatives" going through Singer's trash and mail, picketing her lectures, hacking into her computer, and releasing live rats in her house.<ref name="McLellan2003"/><ref name="Behar1991"/>
Singer faced harassment, including death threats and dead animals placed on her doorstep, from groups that disagreed with her views on cults.<ref name="McLellan2003"/><ref name="leading"/> According to [[Richard Behar]]'s article in ''Time'' magazine, Singer was an outspoken critic of [[Scientology]] and was known to travel under an assumed name to avoid harassment.<ref name="Behar1991">{{cite news|last1=Behar |first1=Richard |title=Scientology: 'Religion' a Thriving Cult of Greed, Power |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,972865-9,00.html |access-date=20 February 2015 |work=Time |date=6 May 1991 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070225132542/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C972865-9%2C00.html |archive-date=February 25, 2007 }}</ref>

Her criticism of cults and their brainwashing tactics resulted in harassment of Singer's family and students as well, including breaking into Singer's office, stealing students' term papers and sending notes to Singer's students.<ref name="sfga_PSYC"/> According to the ''Los Angeles Times'', other examples included cult "operatives" going through Singer's trash and mail, picketing her lectures, hacking into her computer, and releasing live rats in her house.<ref name="McLellan2003"/><ref name="Behar1991"/>


==Honors and awards==
==Honors and awards==
Line 106: Line 104:


== Personal life ==
== Personal life ==
Singer was married to Jerome&nbsp;R. Singer, a physicist and professor at [[University of California, Berkeley]].<ref name="McLellan2003" /> The couple had two children.<ref name="McLellan2003" />

Singer was married to Jerome&nbsp;R. Singer, a physicist and professor at UC Berkeley.<ref name="McLellan2003" /> The couple had two children.<ref name="McLellan2003" />


==Death==
==Death==
Margaret Singer died of [[pneumonia]] on November 23, 2003 in [[Berkeley, California]], at the [[Alta Bates Medical Center]]. She was 82. Singer was survived by her husband, two children, and five grandchildren.<ref name="Lancet" /><ref name="leading">{{Cite web
Margaret Singer died of [[pneumonia]] on November 23, 2003, in [[Berkeley, California]], at the [[Alta Bates Medical Center]] at the age of 82. Singer was survived by her husband, two children, and five grandchildren.<ref name="Lancet" /><ref name="leading">{{Cite web
| title = Margaret Singer, a Leading Brainwashing Expert, Dies at 82
| title = Margaret Singer, a Leading Brainwashing Expert, Dies at 82
| author = O'Connor, Anahad
| author = O'Connor, Anahad
| work = nytimes.com
| work = [[The New York Times]]
| date = 7 December 2003
| date = 7 December 2003
| access-date = 2015-02-20
| access-date = 2015-02-20
Line 120: Line 117:


==Books==
==Books==
*{{cite book|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret Thaler|last2=Lalich|first2=Janja|title="Crazy" Therapies: What Are They? Do They Work?|date=27 September 1996|publisher=Jossey-Bass|location=San Francisco, Calif.|isbn=978-0787902780|title-link=Crazy Therapies}}
*{{cite book|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret Thaler|last2=Lalich|first2=Janja|title="Crazy" Therapies: What Are They? Do They Work?|date=27 September 1996|publisher=Jossey-Bass|location=San Francisco, Calif.|isbn=978-0-7879-0278-0|title-link=Crazy Therapies}}
*{{cite book|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret Thaler|last2=Lalich|first2=Janja|title=Cults in Our Midst|date=1 March 1995|publisher=Jossey-Bass|location=San Francisco, Calif.|isbn=978-0787900519|title-link=Cults in Our Midst}}
*{{cite book|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret Thaler|last2=Lalich|first2=Janja|title=Cults in Our Midst|date=1 March 1995|publisher=Jossey-Bass|location=San Francisco, Calif.|isbn=978-0-7879-0051-9|title-link=Cults in Our Midst}}
*{{cite book|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret Thaler|last2=Nievod|first2=Abraham|editor1-last=Lilienfeld|editor1-first=Scott O.|editor2-last=Lynn|editor2-first=Steven Jay|editor3-last=Lohr|editor3-first=Jeffrey M.|title=Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology|date=2003|publisher=Guilford Press|location=New York|isbn=978-1-59385-070-8|pages=[https://archive.org/details/sciencepseudosci0000unse/page/176 176–204]|edition=Pbk.|url=https://archive.org/details/sciencepseudosci0000unse/page/176}}
*{{cite book|last1=Singer|first1=Margaret Thaler|last2=Nievod|first2=Abraham|editor1-last=Lilienfeld|editor1-first=Scott O.|editor2-last=Lynn|editor2-first=Steven Jay|editor3-last=Lohr|editor3-first=Jeffrey M.|title=Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology|date=2003|publisher=Guilford Press|location=New York|isbn=978-1-59385-070-8|pages=[https://archive.org/details/sciencepseudosci0000unse/page/176 176–204]|edition=Pbk.|url=https://archive.org/details/sciencepseudosci0000unse/page/176}}


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{Reflist}}
{{wikisource|Category:Margaret Singer|Margaret Singer}}
{{wikiquote}}


{{Opposition to NRMs}}
{{Opposition to NRMs}}
{{Authority control}}

{{wikisource|Category:Margaret Singer|Margaret Singer}}
{{wikiquote}}


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Singer, Margaret}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Singer, Margaret}}
[[Category:American psychologists]]
[[Category:20th-century American psychologists]]
[[Category:American women psychologists]]
[[Category:American women psychologists]]
[[Category:Mind control theorists]]
[[Category:Mind control theorists]]
[[Category:Researchers of new religious movements and cults]]
[[Category:Researchers of new religious movements and cults]]
[[Category:Anti-cult movement]]
[[Category:Brainwashing theory proponents]]
[[Category:Brainwashing theory proponents]]
[[Category:Critics of the Unification Church]]
[[Category:Critics of the Unification Church]]
Line 148: Line 144:
[[Category:1921 births]]
[[Category:1921 births]]
[[Category:2003 deaths]]
[[Category:2003 deaths]]
[[Category:Deaths from pneumonia]]
[[Category:Deaths from pneumonia in California]]
[[Category:20th-century psychologists]]
[[Category:American clinical psychologists]]

Latest revision as of 23:54, 3 November 2023

Margaret Singer
Born(1921-07-29)July 29, 1921
DiedNovember 23, 2003(2003-11-23) (aged 82)
Alma materUniversity of Denver, BA, MS
University of Denver, PhD
Known forCults in Our Midst, Crazy Therapies
SpouseJerome R. Singer[1]
Children2
Scientific career
FieldsClinical psychology
Institutions
Doctoral studentsJesse S. Miller

Margaret Thaler Singer (July 29, 1921 – November 23, 2003) was an American clinical psychologist and researcher with her colleague Lyman Wynne on family communication.[2] She was a prominent figure in the study of undue influence in social and religious contexts, and a proponent of the brainwashing theory of new religious movements.

Singer's main areas of research included schizophrenia, family therapy, brainwashing and coercive persuasion. In the 1960s, she began to study the nature of social and religious group influence and mind control, and sat as a board member of the American Family Foundation and as an advisory board member of the Cult Awareness Network. She was the co-author of the book Cults in Our Midst.

Education[edit]

Singer was born in Denver, Colorado, to Margaret McDonough Thaler and Raymond Willard Thaler.[3] Her mother was a secretary to a federal judge and her father was chief operating engineer at the US Mint.[4] While attending the University of Denver, she played cello in the Denver Civic Symphony.[4] She received her Bachelor of Arts in speech and a Master of Science in speech pathology and special education from the University of Denver.[4] Singer received her Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree in clinical psychology from the University of Denver in 1943.[5]

Career[edit]

After obtaining her PhD in clinical psychology, Singer worked at the University of Colorado's School of Medicine's department of psychiatry for eight years.[5] In 1953, she started working at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, where she specialized in studying the returned prisoners of war who had been brainwashed by their captors into denouncing the United States and supporting North Korea and China.[4]

In the scientific community, Singer was best known and respected for her studies in schizophrenia and family therapy.[6] She conducted research with the National Institute of Mental Health, the United States Air Force, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.[4] Singer was a guest lecturer of psychology at University of California, Berkeley, from 1964 to 1991, and she served as a faculty member and lecturer at other University of California campuses as well as the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, the University of Rochester, and other institutions.[7]

Singer's work on family communication won her a place as one of the pioneers in the developing field of family therapy.[8] As noted in one obituary, her collaboration with Lyman Wynne was particularly important.

Singer began to study brainwashing in the 1950s at Walter Reed in Washington, DC, where she interviewed United States soldiers who had been taken prisoner during the Korean War.[4][9] Beginning in the late 1960s, she expanded her studies in the field of cults and published a number of articles on mind control ("psychological coercion") and similar areas. She developed theories about how cults recruit and retain members (such as her Theory of Systematic Manipulation of Social and Psychological Influence) and was on the board of many of the major anti-cult groups and organizations in the United States. At one point, Singer interviewed Charles Manson.[10]

By the 1970s, Singer was a leading researcher in the field of psychosomatic medicine, and became the first female and first psychologist President of the American Psychosomatic Society in 1974.[11] She also served as a member of the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute review board and the American Family Foundation board.[12]

Singer testified as a brainwashing expert at the trial of Patty Hearst, presenting her conclusions that Hearst had been brainwashed, but outside the jury's presence.[4] Singer described Hearst as "a low-IQ, low-affect zombie" and testified that by using speech patterns, she determined that Hearst was reading statements prepared by her captors.[4] Prosecutors argued that Singer's testimony should not be presented to the jury because brainwashing had never before been accepted as a field of expertise upon which expert testimony could be presented.[4] The judge decided in favor of the prosecution, and Hearst was convicted.[4] Singer's testimony was widely reported, which increased her reputation as a brainwashing expert.[4]

Singer played a role in the "Hillside Strangler" trial of Kenneth Bianchi. Singer concluded that Bianchi had faked symptoms of multiple personality disorder, in order to escape responsibility for the murders of several women in Los Angeles.[10] Later, she spoke about the trial on PBS Frontline in a special show entitled: "The Mind of a Murderer." Singer asserted that Bianchi was a psychopath, and stated: "He may simply be evil."[10]

Her expert testimony was no longer accepted after the report of the APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control, of which she was chair, was rejected by the Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology (BSERP) of the American Psychological Association.[13] Melton has written that afterward, courts began to shift toward accepting the position held by the great majority of scholars studying new religious movements, moving away from the minority perspective of Singer and others sympathetic to her brainwashing claims.[14] According to Melton, this had significant consequences later on, since it meant that brainwashing could no longer be used as a defense for the practice of deprogramming.[14]

DIMPAC task force controversy and aftermath[edit]

In the early 1980s, some American mental health professionals became well-known figures due to their involvement as expert witnesses in court cases against groups they considered to be cults. In their testimonies they presented theories of brainwashing, mind control, or coercive persuasion to support the legal positions of former group members against their former groups.

The American Psychological Association (APA) in 1983 asked Singer, who was one of the leading proponents of coercive persuasion theories, to chair a taskforce to investigate whether brainwashing or "coercive persuasion" did indeed play a role in recruitment by such groups. The task force was called the APA Task Force on Deceptive and Indirect Methods of Persuasion and Control (DIMPAC). The task force completed its final report in November 1986. In May 1987 the APA Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology (BSERP) rejected the DIMPAC final report, stating that the report "lack[ed] the scientific rigor and evenhanded critical approach necessary for APA imprimatur," and also stating that the BSERP did "not believe that we have sufficient information available to guide us in taking a position on this issue."[15]

Singer and her associate, sociologist Richard Ofshe, subsequently sued the APA, and a group of scholars and lawyers, in 1992 for "defamation, frauds, aiding and abetting and conspiracy,"[16] and lost in 1994.[17] In a further ruling, James R. Lambden ordered Ofshe and Singer to pay 80,000 USD in attorneys' fees under California's SLAPP-suit law. At that time, Singer and Ofshe declared their intention to sue Michael Flomenhaft, the lawyer that represented them in the case, for malpractice.[18]

Singer was subsequently not accepted by judges as an expert witness in four cases alleging brainwashing and mind control.[19][20][21][22]

After the report was rejected, Singer reworked much of the rejected material into the book Cults in Our Midst: The Hidden Menace in Our Everyday Lives, which she co-authored with Janja Lalich.[23]

Landmark Education legal dispute (1996)[edit]

In 1996, Landmark Education sued Singer for defamation.[24] Singer mentioned Landmark Education in Cults in our Midst; it was unclear whether she labeled Landmark Education as a cult or not. Singer issued a statement stating that she did not intend to call Landmark a cult, nor did she consider it a cult.[25] Singer removed the references to Landmark Education from subsequent editions of the book.

Amanda Scioscia reported in the Phoenix New Times that Singer never called Landmark a cult, but that she described it as a "controversial new age training course". She also stated that she would not recommend the group to anyone, and would not comment on whether Landmark used coercive persuasion for fear of legal recrimination from Landmark.[24]

Harassment and death threat complaints[edit]

Singer faced harassment, including death threats and dead animals placed on her doorstep, from groups that disagreed with her views on cults.[4][7] According to Richard Behar's article in Time magazine, Singer was an outspoken critic of Scientology and was known to travel under an assumed name to avoid harassment.[26]

Her criticism of cults and their brainwashing tactics resulted in harassment of Singer's family and students as well, including breaking into Singer's office, stealing students' term papers and sending notes to Singer's students.[9] According to the Los Angeles Times, other examples included cult "operatives" going through Singer's trash and mail, picketing her lectures, hacking into her computer, and releasing live rats in her house.[4][26]

Honors and awards[edit]

Personal life[edit]

Singer was married to Jerome R. Singer, a physicist and professor at University of California, Berkeley.[4] The couple had two children.[4]

Death[edit]

Margaret Singer died of pneumonia on November 23, 2003, in Berkeley, California, at the Alta Bates Medical Center at the age of 82. Singer was survived by her husband, two children, and five grandchildren.[5][7]

Books[edit]

  • Singer, Margaret Thaler; Lalich, Janja (September 27, 1996). "Crazy" Therapies: What Are They? Do They Work?. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 978-0-7879-0278-0.
  • Singer, Margaret Thaler; Lalich, Janja (March 1, 1995). Cults in Our Midst. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 978-0-7879-0051-9.
  • Singer, Margaret Thaler; Nievod, Abraham (2003). Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Lynn, Steven Jay; Lohr, Jeffrey M. (eds.). Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology (Pbk. ed.). New York: Guilford Press. pp. 176–204. ISBN 978-1-59385-070-8.

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Biography". berkeley.edu. University of California. January 3, 2007. Retrieved June 12, 2019.
  2. ^ "Lyman Wynne". isps.org.
  3. ^ Singer, Margaret Thaler (1994). Cults in our midst. Lalich, Janja,, Lifton, Robert Jay, 1926- (First ed.). San Francisco. pp. XIV. ISBN 0-7879-0051-6. OCLC 31170479.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q McLellan, Dennis (November 28, 2003). "Margaret Singer, 82; Expert on Brainwashing, Cults Testified at 1976 Trial of Patricia Hearst". Los Angeles Times Articles. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
  5. ^ a b c Oransky, Ivan (January 2004). "Margaret Thaler Singer Obituary". The Lancet. 363 (9406): 403. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15460-3. PMID 15124608. S2CID 40822752.
  6. ^ "Margaret Singer, Expert On Cults, Brainwashing". Sun Sentinel. November 29, 2003. Archived from the original on February 20, 2015. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
  7. ^ a b c O'Connor, Anahad (December 7, 2003). "Margaret Singer, a Leading Brainwashing Expert, Dies at 82". The New York Times. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
  8. ^ Nichols, M., & Schwartz, R. (2005). Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods (7th Ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
  9. ^ a b Fagan, Kevin (May 26, 2002). "PSYCH SLEUTH / Margaret Singer has made history delving into the psychology of brainwashing". SFGate. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
  10. ^ a b c Lilienfeld, Scott O. (November 23, 2003). "In Memoriam: Dr. Margaret Thaler Singer". The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. 3 (1).
  11. ^ Singer, Margaret Thaler (February 1974). "Presidential Address". Psychosomatic Medicine. 36 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1097/00006842-197401000-00001. PMID 4810834.
  12. ^ a b Rubenstein, Steve (November 25, 2003). "Margaret Singer -- expert on brainwashing". SFGate. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
  13. ^ J. Gordon Melton, "Anti-cultists in the United States: An historical perspective," in New Religious Movements: Challenge and Response, edited b Bryan R. Wilson and Jamie Cresswell, 213–33. London and New York: Routledge, 1999. p. 227.
  14. ^ a b Gallagher, Eugene V.; Ashcraft, William Michael, eds. (October 30, 2006). Introduction to new and alternative religions in America. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. p. 137. ISBN 978-0275987121.
  15. ^ "CESNUR - APA Memo of 1987 with Enclosures". www.cesnur.org. Retrieved August 3, 2022.
  16. ^ Dr. Margaret Singer and Dr. Richard Ofshe Sue Associations, The Cult Observer, Vol. 9 No. 8, 1992
  17. ^ Case No. 730012-8, Margaret Singer, et al., Plaintiff v. American Psychological Association, et. Al., Defendants
    "This case, which involves claims of defamation, frauds, aiding and abetting and conspiracy, clearly constitutes a dispute over the application of the First Amendment to a public debate over matters both academic and professional."
  18. ^ Allen. Charlotte, Brainwashed! Scholars of Cults Accuse Each Other of Bad Faith, December 1998. Available online
  19. ^ District of Columbia Court of Appeal, case 853 F.2d 948, Kropinski v. World Plan Executive Council.
    "Kropinski failed to provide any evidence that Singer’s particular theory, namely that techniques of thought reform may be effective in the absence of physical threats or coercion, has a significant following in the scientific community, let alone general acceptance.
  20. ^ Robin George v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, District Court of California Appeals, August 1989, case cited in Lewis, James R. The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements, pp.194, ISBN 0-19-514986-6
  21. ^ Boyle, Robin A., Women, the Law, and Cults: Three Avenues of Legal Recourse—New Rape Laws, Violence Against Women Act, and Antistalking Laws, Cultic Studies Journal, 15, 1–32. (1999) in reference to United States v. Fishman, United States District Court of California, CR–88-0616; DLG CR 90 0357 DLG
  22. ^ Jane Green and Patrick Ryan v. Maharishi Yogi, US District Court, Washington, DC, March 13, 1991, Case #87-0015 OG
  23. ^ Bill Piekarski, Southwestern Coll. Lib., Chula Vista, California, Library Journal, 1995, Reed Business Information, Inc.
    In 1992, Singer (emeritus adjunct, psychology, Univ. of California at Berkeley) unsuccessfully sued the American Psychological Association and the American Sociological Association, alleging conspiracy to discredit her research and destroy her reputation.
  24. ^ a b Scioscia, Amanda (October 19, 2000). "Drive-thru Deliverance". Phoenix Times. Archived from the original on October 16, 2006.
  25. ^ Singer, Margaret. "STATEMENT BY MARGARET SINGER" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 3, 2008. Retrieved July 31, 2008.
  26. ^ a b Behar, Richard (May 6, 1991). "Scientology: 'Religion' a Thriving Cult of Greed, Power". Time. Archived from the original on February 25, 2007. Retrieved February 20, 2015.